LAMPIRAN 1. Lampiran Nama dan Kondisi Perusahaan Textile No Kode Nama Perusahaan Hasil z-score FD Non-FD

Similar documents
Lampiran 1 Tabel 3.1 Sampel No. Kode Nama Perusahaan Sumber : didownload tanggal 13 November 2016 (data diolah)

DATA PENELITIAN 1. CAR CAR (%)

Lampiran 1 DAFTAR PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA TAHUN (Menyajikan Laporan Keuangan Secara Berturut-turut)

HASIL OUTPUT SPSS. Reliability Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Lampiran 1: Nama Perusahaan yang menjadi Sampel Penelitian

Rata-Rata Nilai Debt to Equity Ratio (DER) Perusahaan Otomotif yang 0, ,97 0, ,44 1,9 1,6 1,4 1,7 1,65

LAMPIRAN DAFTAR SAMPEL PENELITIAN. Kriteria No. Nama Perusahaan. Sampel Emiten

Daftar Sampel Perusahaan

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION, SUGGESTION AND LIMITATION. 1. Independent commissioner boards proportion does not negatively affect

Lampiran i Jadwal Penelitian

DAFTAR LAMPIRAN. Daftar Perusahaan yang dijadikan sampel

. Enter. Model Summary b. Std. Error. of the. Estimate. Change. a. Predictors: (Constant), Emphaty, reliability, Assurance, responsive, Tangible

Lampiran 1. Data Perusahaan

Lampiran IV. Hasil Output SPSS Versi 16.0 untuk Analisis Deskriptif

Daftar Sampel Perusahaan Pertambangan. 4 BORN Borneo Lumbung Energy & Metal, Tbk

Lampiran 1. Daftar Sampel Perusahaan

Perusahaan Consumer Goods yang Terdaftar di BEI ( ) Nama Perusahaan Perusahaan 1

Daftar Perusahaan Real Estate dan Property

DATA SAMPEL TAHUN 2006

Data Nama Perusahaan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di BEI.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Industry Classification/Stock Name

LAMPIRAN 1 : DAFTAR PERUSAHAAN SAMPEL PERIODE

TRY OUT 30 Responden Variabel Kompetensi/ x1

LAMPIRAN I Data Perusahaan Sampel kode DPS EPS Ekuitas akpi ,97 51,04 40,

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran 1 Data Sampel Penelitian

LAMPIRAN A. Tabulasi Data Perusahaan Sample

UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILIAS VARIABEL KOMPENSASI

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran I. Daftar Populasi Perusahaan Properti dan Real Estate di Bursa Efek Indonesia No Kode. Kriteria Nama Perusahaan Emiten 1 2 3

Lampiran 1. Proses Pemilihan Sampel. Universitas Sumatera Utara

Lampiran 1. Daftar Perusahaan Sampel. No Kode Nama Perusahaan

TRY OUT 25 Responden Variabel Kepuasan / x1

LAMPIRAN 1. Tabel 1. Data Indeks Harga Saham PT. ANTAM, tbk Periode 20 Januari Februari 2012

LAMPIRAN. Daftar Perusahaan Manufaktur yang menjadi sampel. 1 AMFG PT.Asahimas Flat Glass Tbk 1. 2 INDF PT. Indofood Skses Makmur Tbk 2

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran 1. Data deviden untuk menghitung economic performance tahun

Lampiran 1. Tabel Sampel Penelitian

Team project 2017 Dony Pratidana S. Hum Bima Agus Setyawan S. IIP

Daftar Nama Perusaahan. yang ada di Industri Consumer Goods periode

Lampiran 1. Daftar perusahaan sampel

Lampiran 1. Sampel Penelitian No. Kode Nama Perusahaan 1 AISA Tiga Pilar Sejahtera Food Tbk 2 AKPI Argha Karya Prima Industry Tbk 3 ALKA Alaska

LAMPIRAN 1 Perusahaan Sampel Penelitian Tahun

Universitas Sumatera Utara

LAMPIRAN I FORMULIR SURVEI

Daftar Perusahaan Sektor Property and Realestate yang terdaftar di BEI

a. Uji kenormalan data model sebaran suhu pada band 7 citra tahun 2001 b. Uji kenormalan data model sebaran suhu pada band 4 citra tahun 2006

Lampiran 1 Daftar Perusahaan Sampel 2012

Lampiran 1 Daftar Populasi dan Sampel Perusahaan Manufaktur Periode

Data Hasil Olahan Populasi

Appendix B STATISTICAL TABLES OVERVIEW

Lampiran 1. Penjualan PT Honda Mandiri Bogor

Lampiran 1. Sampel Nama Perusahaan No Kode Perusahaan

Lampiran 1. Uji Validitas dan Reliability Variabel Kualitas Pelayanan

Daftar Nama Perusahaan Sampel Tahun 2010

Team project 2017 Dony Pratidana S. Hum Bima Agus Setyawan S. IIP

MODUL PELATIHAN SEM ANANDA SABIL HUSSEIN, PHD

Getting Started with Correlated Component Regression (CCR) in XLSTAT-CCR

Lampiran 1. Kriteria Pemilihan Sampel

MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENT MODEL ON THE ROAD SECTION OF HIGHLANDS REGION BY USING GENELARIZED LINEAR MODEL

Important Formulas. Discrete Probability Distributions. Probability and Counting Rules. The Normal Distribution. Confidence Intervals and Sample Size

DAFTAR SAMPEL PERUSAHAAN

Review of Upstate Load Forecast Uncertainty Model

fruitfly fecundity example summary Tuesday, July 17, :13:19 PM 1

APPENDIX A. A.1 Sample of Indian MFIs

THERMOELECTRIC SAMPLE CONDITIONER SYSTEM (TESC)

Influence of motorcycles lane to the traffic volume and travel speed in Denpasar, Indonesia

Antonio Olmos Priyalatha Govindasamy Research Methods & Statistics University of Denver

: ( .

LAMPIRAN UJI VALIDITAS

Linking the Virginia SOL Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

Linking the Georgia Milestones Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

Linking the North Carolina EOG Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

Linking the Kansas KAP Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

Author s Accepted Manuscript

Linking the Alaska AMP Assessments to NWEA MAP Tests

Linking the New York State NYSTP Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

Linking the Mississippi Assessment Program to NWEA MAP Tests

From Developing Credit Risk Models Using SAS Enterprise Miner and SAS/STAT. Full book available for purchase here.

Linking the Florida Standards Assessments (FSA) to NWEA MAP

Linking the Indiana ISTEP+ Assessments to NWEA MAP Tests

Stat 301 Lecture 30. Model Selection. Explanatory Variables. A Good Model. Response: Highway MPG Explanatory: 13 explanatory variables

FACTORS INFLUENCING ROAD ACCIDENTS IN SRI LANKA: A LOGISTIC REGRESSION APPROACH. Introduction

LAMPIRAN. Populasi dan Sampel

Sharif University of Technology. Graduate School of Management and Economics. Econometrics I. Fall Seyed Mahdi Barakchian

Model Information Data Set. Response Variable (Events) Summe Response Variable (Trials) N Response Distribution Binomial Link Function

Muskrat Falls Project - Exhibit 45 Page 1 of 7

populasi 37 ipo dan relisting 6 laporan keuangan tidak lengkap 1 laba dan modal negatif 8 lengkap 22 sampel 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014,

The Influence of Accident Related Factors on Road Fatalities Considering Bali Province in Indonesia as a Case Study

Regression Models Course Project, 2016

Booklet of Code and Output for STAD29/STA 1007 Final Exam

Linking the Indiana ISTEP+ Assessments to the NWEA MAP Growth Tests. February 2017 Updated November 2017

Stat 401 B Lecture 31

5. CONSTRUCTION OF THE WEIGHT-FOR-LENGTH AND WEIGHT-FOR- HEIGHT STANDARDS

Road Surface characteristics and traffic accident rates on New Zealand s state highway network

Lecture 2. Review of Linear Regression I Statistics Statistical Methods II. Presented January 9, 2018

Reliability and Validity of Seat Interface Pressure to Quantify Seating Comfort in Motorcycles

female male help("predict") yhat age

namibia UniVERSITY OF SCIEnCE AnD TECHnOLOGY FACULTY OF HEALTH AND APPLIED SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS MARKS: 100

Robust alternatives to best linear unbiased prediction of complex traits

Level of service model for exclusive motorcycle lane

Statistics and Quantitative Analysis U4320. Segment 8 Prof. Sharyn O Halloran

Transcription:

87 LAMPIRAN 1. Lampiran Nama dan Kondisi Perusahaan Textile 2010-2014 No Kode Nama Perusahaan Hasil z-score FD Non-FD 1 ADMG PT Polychem Indonesia Tbk 1,39 1 2 ARGO PT Argo Pantes Tbk 0,93 1 3 CTNX PT Century Textile Tbk 1,16 1 4 ERTX PT Eratex Djaya Tbk 5,43 0 5 ESTI PT Ever Shine Tex Tbk 1,67 1 6 HDTX PT Panasia Indo Resources Tbk 1,42 1 7 INDR PT Indo Rama Synthetic Tbk 2,01 1 8 MYTX PT Apac Citra Centerlex Tbk 1,71 1 9 PBRX PT Pan Brothers Tbk 2,14 1 10 POLY PT Asia Pasific Fibers Tbk 4,78 0 11 RICY PT Ricky Putra Globalindo Tbk 2,18 1 12 SSTM PT Suson Textile Manufacturer Tbk 1,27 1 13 STAR PT Star Petrochem Tbk 1,23 1 14 TFCO PT Tifico Fiber Indonesia Tbk 2,30 1 15 UNIT PT Nusantara Inti Corpora Tbk 2,46 1 16 ADMG PT Polychem Indonesia Tbk 2,56 1 17 ARGO PT Argo Pantes Tbk 1,12 1 18 CTNX PT Century Textile Tbk 1,73 1 19 ERTX PT Eratex Djaya Tbk 4,09 0 20 ESTI PT Ever Shine Tex Tbk 1,69 1 21 HDTX PT Panasia Indo Resources Tbk 1,85 1 22 INDR PT Indo Rama Synthetic Tbk 1,76 1 23 MYTX PT Apac Citra Centerlex Tbk 1,77 1 24 PBRX PT Pan Brothers Tbk 1,98 1 25 POLY PT Asia Pasific Fibers Tbk 5,01 0 26 RICY PT Ricky Putra Globalindo Tbk 2,17 1 27 SSTM PT Suson Textile Manufacturer Tbk 1,27 1 28 STAR PT Star Petrochem Tbk 1,78 1 29 TFCO PT Tifico Fiber Indonesia Tbk 3,41 0 30 UNIT PT Nusantara Inti Corpora Tbk 2,64 1 87

88 31 ADMG PT Polychem Indonesia Tbk 1,86 1 32 ARGO PT Argo Pantes Tbk 1,08 1 33 CTNX PT Century Textile Tbk 1,52 1 34 ERTX PT Eratex Djaya Tbk 1,33 1 35 ESTI PT Ever Shine Tex Tbk 1,61 1 36 HDTX PT Panasia Indo Resources Tbk 1,19 1 37 INDR PT Indo Rama Synthetic Tbk 1,61 1 38 MYTX PT Apac Citra Centerlex Tbk 1,52 1 39 PBRX PT Pan Brothers Tbk 2,19 1 40 POLY PT Asia Pasific Fibers Tbk 4,86 0 41 RICY PT Ricky Putra Globalindo Tbk 1,17 1 42 SSTM PT Suson Textile Manufacturer Tbk 1,37 1 43 STAR PT Star Petrochem Tbk 1,72 1 44 TFCO PT Tifico Fiber Indonesia Tbk 4,05 0 45 UNIT PT Nusantara Inti Corpora Tbk 1,48 1 46 ADMG PT Polychem Indonesia Tbk 2,11 1 47 ARGO PT Argo Pantes Tbk 0,97 1 48 CTNX PT Century Textile Tbk 1,61 1 49 ERTX PT Eratex Djaya Tbk 1,52 1 50 ESTI PT Ever Shine Tex Tbk 2,74 1 51 HDTX PT Panasia Indo Resources Tbk 1,53 1 52 INDR PT Indo Rama Synthetic Tbk 1,52 1 53 MYTX PT Apac Citra Centerlex Tbk 1,33 1 54 PBRX PT Pan Brothers Tbk 2,75 1 55 POLY PT Asia Pasific Fibers Tbk 5,28 0 56 RICY PT Ricky Putra Globalindo Tbk 1,23 1 57 SSTM PT Suson Textile Manufacturer Tbk 1,26 1 58 STAR PT Star Petrochem Tbk 1,84 1 59 TFCO PT Tifico Fiber Indonesia Tbk 4,16 60 UNIT PT Nusantara Inti Corpora Tbk 1,25 1 61 ADMG PT Polychem Indonesia Tbk 2,58 1 62 ARGO PT Argo Pantes Tbk 2,14 1 63 CTNX PT Century Textile Tbk 1,72 1 64 ERTX PT Eratex Djaya Tbk 1,65 1 88

89 65 ESTI PT Ever Shine Tex Tbk 1,68 1 66 HDTX PT Panasia Indo Resources Tbk 0,51 1 67 INDR PT Indo Rama Synthetic Tbk 1,48 1 68 MYTX PT Apac Citra Centerlex Tbk 2,00 1 69 PBRX PT Pan Brothers Tbk 3,13 0 70 POLY PT Asia Pasific Fibers Tbk 7,79 0 71 RICY PT Ricky Putra Globalindo Tbk 1,77 1 72 SSTM PT Suson Textile Manufacturer Tbk 1,17 1 73 STAR PT Star Petrochem Tbk 1,65 1 74 TFCO PT Tifico Fiber Indonesia Tbk 4,32 0 75 UNIT PT Nusantara Inti Corpora Tbk 1,30 1 2. Lampiran Hasil Hitung Variabel Penelitian X1 X2 X3 X4 Y 1,14 0,01 0,70 5,58 1 0,61 0,09 0,85 5,67 1 0,70 0,03 0,08 4,65 1 0,42 0,42 0,19 4,62 0 0,90 0,01 0,56 2,91 1 0,84 0,00 0,46 0,52 1 1,09 0,05 0,49 7,24 1 0,43 0,12 0,90 13,65 1 1,23 0,04 0,81 3,74 1 0,15 0,00 0,23 9,64 0 1,82 0,02 0,45 2,72 1 2,01 0,01 0,63 1,78 1 0,64 0,01 0,40 1,86 1 1,00 0,05 0,53 7,92 1 1,21 0,01 0,23 2,91 1 1,34 0,05 0,51 5,45 1 1,03 0,07 0,93 4,48 1 1,06 0,10 0,84 6,58 1 0,99 0,49 0,40 3,31 0 89

90 1,23 0,01 0,60 2,81 1 0,99 0,02 0,44 1,32 1 1,10 0,01 0,56 7,46 1 0,46 0,07 0,97 10,38 1 1,44 0,08 0,46 5,13 1 0,20 0,01 0,01 7,01 0 1,78 0,02 0,45 2,75 1 1,83 0,03 0,65 1,03 1 1,68 0,01 0,33 3,84 1 1,19 0,09 0,24 9,83 0 1,13 0,01 0,21 3,24 1 2,15 0,01 0,47 4,93 1 0,66 0,07 0,88 3,33 1 1,02 0,12 0,93 5,51 1 1,04 0,01 0,80 4,57 1 0,95 0,05 0,55 2,49 1 0,93 0,00 0,53 4,36 1 1,12 0,00 0,57 0,67 1 0,50 0,07 1,03 2,75 1 1,28 0,03 0,58 5,30 1 0,21 0,08 0,50 0,74 0 2,25 0,01 0,56 0,58 1 1,72 0,02 0,65 1,42 1 1,92 0,00 0,35 2,61 1 1,61 0,02 0,23 1,07 0 0,57 0,00 0,37 2,50 1 2,64 0,00 0,43 4,58 1 0,67 0,03 0,86 3,13 1 0,49 0,00 0,93 0,59 1 1,01 0,02 0,77 0,62 1 0,86 0,07 0,59 2,04 1 0,45 0,09 0,70 0,82 1 1,12 0,00 0,59 0,49 1 0,48 0,02 1,05 3,43 1 90

91 3,34 0,04 0,58 0,71 1 0,21 0,09 0,51 0,76 0 2,10 0,01 0,57 0,98 1 1,31 0,02 0,66 1,66 1 1,87 0,00 0,35 3,87 1 1,61 0,02 0,18 0,62 0 0,40 0,00 0,47 2,30 1 2,55 0,05 0,37 5,75 1 0,41 0,21 1,15 5,22 1 0,50 0,01 0,91 6,01 1 1,74 0,00 0,37 2,89 1 0,71 0,08 0,66 1,93 1 0,95 0,02 0,85 0,86 1 1,08 0,01 0,59 0,21 1 0,42 0,08 1,13 0,43 1 3,86 0,03 0,44 0,57 0 0,16 0,29 0,66 1,24 0 1,75 0,01 0,66 2,68 1 1,20 0,02 0,67 1,49 1 1,74 0,00 0,37 2,89 1 1,84 0,01 0,15 1,86 0 0,45 0,01 0,45 2,20 1 3. Lampiran Hasil SPSS 1. Deksriptif Statistik Descriptive Statistics N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation LIKUIDITAS 75,15 3,86 1,1665,71782 PROFIT 75,00,49,0489,08325 SOLVA 75,01 1,15,5704,25116 AKTIVITAS 75,21 13,65 3,4092 2,68486 FD 75,00 1,00,8400,36907 Valid N (listwise) 75 91

92 2. Regresi Logistik Case Processing Summary Unweighted Cases a N Percent Included in Analysis 75 100,0 Selected Cases Missing Cases 0,0 Total 75 100,0 Unselected Cases 0,0 Total 75 100,0 a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases. Dependent Variable Encoding Original Value Internal Value,00 0 1,00 1 Iteration History a,b,c Iteration -2 Log likelihood Coefficients Constant 1 66,909 1,360 Step 0 2 65,957 1,632 3 65,950 1,658 4 65,950 1,658 a. Constant is included in the model. b. Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 65,950 c. Estimation terminated at iteration number 4 92

93 Classification Table a,b Observed FD,00 1,00 Predicted Percentage Correct Step 0 FD,00 0 12,0 1,00 0 63 100,0 Overall Percentage 84,0 a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is,500 Variables in the Equation B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Step 0 Constant 1,658,315 27,717 1,000 5,250 Variables not in the Equation Score df Sig. LIKUIDITAS,468 1,494 Step 0 Variables PROFIT 13,447 1,000 SOLVA 15,366 1,000 AKTIVITAS,002 1,966 Overall Statistics 32,427 4,000 Iteration History a,b,c,d Iteration -2 Log likelihood Coefficients Constant LIKUIDITAS PROFIT SOLVA AKTIVITAS 1 44,829 -,380,228-7,923 3,048,036 2 33,562-1,206,200-15,931 6,062,076 3 27,875-2,012,000-29,527 9,606,149 Step 1 4 25,804-2,627 -,130-45,552 12,641,235 5 25,477-2,861 -,215-54,677 14,277,282 6 25,466-2,902 -,236-56,617 14,645,292 7 25,466-2,904 -,237-56,702 14,661,292 8 25,466-2,904 -,237-56,702 14,661,292 93

94 Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients Chi-square df Sig. Step 40,485 4,000 Step 1 Block 40,485 4,000 Model 40,485 4,000 Model Summary Step -2 Log likelihood Cox & Snell R Square Nagelkerke R Square 1 25,466 a,417,713 a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 8 because parameter estimates changed by less than,001. Hosmer and Lemeshow Test Step Chi-square df Sig. 1 4,760 7,689 Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test FD =,00 FD = 1,00 Total Observed Expected Observed Expected 1 7 7,157 1,843 8 2 4 3,521 4 4,479 8 3 0,627 8 7,373 8 4 0,397 8 7,603 8 Step 1 5 1,195 7 7,805 8 6 0,062 8 7,938 8 7 0,028 8 7,972 8 8 0,011 8 7,989 8 9 0,001 11 10,999 11 94

95 Classification Table a Observed FD,00 1,00 Predicted Percentage Correct Step 1 FD,00 9 3 75,0 1,00 1 62 98,4 Overall Percentage 94,7 a. The cut value is,500 Correlation Matrix Constant LIKUIDITAS PROFIT SOLVA AKTIVITAS Constant 1,000 -,422,123 -,601 -,604 LIKUIDITAS -,422 1,000,359 -,224 -,032 Step 1 PROFIT,123,359 1,000 -,725 -,323 SOLVA -,601 -,224 -,725 1,000,413 AKTIVITAS -,604 -,032 -,323,413 1,000 95

96 Hasil Uji Kolmogorov Smirnov One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test LIKUIDITAS PROFIT SOLVA AKTIVITAS FD N 75 75 75 75 75 Normal Parameters a,b Mean 1,1665,0489,5704 3,4092,8400 Std. Deviation,71782,08325,25116 2,68486,36907 Most Extreme Differences Absolute,131,278,082,134,508 Positive,131,230,082,134,332 Negative -,078 -,278 -,058 -,120 -,508 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1,138 2,411,712 1,158 4,397 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed),150,000,691,137,000 a. Test distribution is Normal. b. Calculated from data. Hasil Uji KS setelah transformasi One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test LIKUIDITAS LN_PROF SOLVA AKTIVITAS LN_FD N 75 62 75 75 63 Normal Parameters a,b Mean 1,1665-3,4425,5704 3,4092,0000 Std. Deviation,71782 1,04971,25116 2,68486,00000 c Most Extreme Differences Absolute,131,172,082,134 Positive,131,172,082,134 Negative -,078 -,134 -,058 -,120 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1,138 1,358,712 1,158 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed),150,050,691,137 a. Test distribution is Normal. b. Calculated from data. c. The distribution has no variance for this variable. One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test cannot be performed. 96

97 One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test LIKUIDITAS LN_PROF SOLVA AKTIVITAS LN_FD Unstandardized Residual N 75 62 75 75 63 62 Normal Parameters a,b Mean 1,1665-3,4425,5704 3,4092,0000,0000000 Std. Deviation,71782 1,04971,25116 2,68486,00000 c,28301127 Most Extreme Differences Absolute,131,172,082,134,127 Positive,131,172,082,134,076 Negative -,078 -,134 -,058 -,120 -,127 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1,138 1,358,712 1,158,999 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed),150,050,691,137,271 a. Test distribution is Normal. 3. Asumsi Klasik ANOVA a Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Regression 4,163 4 1,041 12,141,000 b 1 Residual 4,886 57,086 Total 9,048 61 a. Dependent Variable: FD b. Predictors: (Constant), AKTIVITAS, SOLVA, LN_PROF, LIKUIDITAS 97

98 Model Summary b Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate Durbin-Watson 1,678 a,460,422,29277 2,342 a. Predictors: (Constant), AKTIVITAS, SOLVA, LN_PROF, LIKUIDITAS b. Dependent Variable: FD Coefficients a Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients B Std. Error Beta t Sig. (Constant) -,443,201-2,209,031 LIKUIDITAS,046,058,086,796,429 1 LN_PROF -,169,039 -,460-4,318,000 SOLVA,914,152,617 5,999,000 AKTIVITAS,025,014,181 1,780,080 a. Dependent Variable: FD 98

99 99