RUNWAY ROUGHNESS CONSIDERATIONS. SWIFT 2013 Chris Olidis, P.Eng.

Similar documents
MnDOT s Experience with IRI Specifications

SECTION 602 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SMOOTHNESS

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (MEAN ROUGHNESS INDEX ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)

Ride Smoothness Measurement and Specification Issues. Nicholas Vitillo, Ph. D. Manager, Bureau of Research New Jersey Department of Transportation

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (IRI ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)

Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation

Table Standardized Naming Convention for ERD Files

ITEM 585 RIDE QUALITY FOR PAVEMENT SURFACES Description. Measure and evaluate the ride quality of pavement surfaces.

NCDOT Rideability and IRI Special Provision. Nilesh Neel Surti, PE North Carolina DOT State Pavement Construction Engineer

DESCRIPTION This work consists of measuring the smoothness of the final concrete or bituminous surface.

Profiler Certification Process at the Virginia Smart Road

An Update on Smoothness Specifications at ODOT

LESSONS LEARNT FROM THE MEASUREMENT OF GRAVEL ROAD ROUGHNESS IN KWAZULU-NATAL

PN 420-7/18/ SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW

THE USE OF PERFORMANCE METRICS ON THE PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE

SECTIO N 610 PAVEMENT SMO O THNESS

Non-Destructive Pavement Testing at IDOT. LaDonna R. Rowden, P.E. Pavement Technology Engineer

Lowering Pavement Evaluation Costs Using Big Data

PN /21/ SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS

Summary of Pavement Smoothness Specifications in Canada and Around the World

Section 6. Ride Specification Special Provisions Step-by-Step Ride Guide for Inspectors and Project Engineers

FIGURE 15. MANUAL RUT DEPTH

METODS OF MEASURING DISTRESS

Final Report FHWA/IN/JTRP-2003/8 EVALUATION OF INDOT CONSTRUCTION SMOOTHNESS SPECIFICATIONS

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...

Concrete Airport Pavement Workshop Right Choice, Right Now ACPA SE Chapter Hilton Atlanta Airport November 8, 2012

Research Update Construction Conference Charles Holzschuher, P.E. February 3, Florida Department of Transportation

A Study on Correlation between International Roughness Index and Present Serviceability Rating

Fundamentals of Paving Smoothness

DIVISION V SURFACINGS AND PAVEMENTS

Line-of-Sight, Out of Mind: Inertial Roll Alignment. Ryan Best Technical Sales Representative

SMOOTH MOVING - it's a measure of quality (1st of 3 articles) HMA = Smoothness

SMOOTH PAVEMENTS LAST LONGER! Diamond Grinding THE ULTIMATE QUESTION! Rigid Pavement Design Equation. Preventive Maintenance 2 Session 2 2-1

Field Verification of Smoothness Requirements for Weigh-In-Motion Approaches

Control of Pavement Smoothness in Kansas

Roadscanners Products for Intelligent Asset Management

On Low Speed Problem in Road Smoothness Profiling. Vadim Peretroukhine Michael Nieminen. September 28,

RUTGERS PAVEMENT RESOURCE CENTER RIDE QUALITY TOOLS

Runway Surface Condition Assessment and Reporting. History Behind FAA Friction Level Classifications. Federal Aviation Administration

Outline. Terms To Be Familiar With (cont d) Terms To Be Familiar With. Deflectometer Equipment. Why are these two terms critical?

Efficient and Effective bearing performance evaluation

Smoothness Specification Update

Ride vibration & road condition

Introduction to Seminar: Technical Content. Terms To Be Familiar With. Outline. 5. Garbage in, garbage out (6)

CATEGORY 500 PAVING SECTION 535 PAVEMENT SURFACE PROFILE

Managing the Maintenance of the Runway at Baghdad International Airport

Round robin tests in the Netherlands

Surveys consistently show that smoothness is. Smooth Going How new technology is changing quest for smooth pavements !"#$!"#$%"$

Beyond the Specifications: Best Practices for OBSI Measurement

Pavement Surface Properties Consortium Phase II (TPF-5[345])

RSMS. RSMS is. Road Surface Management System. Road Surface Management Goals - CNHRPC. Road Surface Management Goals - Municipal

Brüel & Kjær and LDS The Perfect Match SHORT FORM CATALOGUE

Localized-Based Control Algorithm For Passenger Ride Comfort

Rehabilitated PCC Surface Characteristics

Maintaining frictional resistance on mine road surfaces. Presented by Cres Bulger Inspector Of Mines (Qld)

TRACC. Trinity Attenuating Crash Cushion

a road is neither cheap nor fast.

SPMM OUTLINE SPECIFICATION - SP20016 issue 2 WHAT IS THE SPMM 5000?

ASTM D4169 Truck Profile Update Rationale Revision Date: September 22, 2016

THE FKFS 0D/1D-SIMULATION. Concepts studies, engineering services and consulting

SPMM OUTLINE SPECIFICATION - SP20016 issue 2 WHAT IS THE SPMM 5000?

Median Barriers in North Carolina -- Long Term Evaluation. Safety Evaluation Group Traffic Safety Systems Management Section

Evaluation of the Rolling Wheel Deflectometer (RWD) in Louisiana. John Ashley Horne Dr. Mostafa A Elseifi

Staff Instruction. Ferry Fuel System Field Acceptance Criteria

Powertrain and Chassis Hardware-in-the- Loop (HIL) Simulation of Ford s Autonomous Vehicle Platform

(2111) Digital Test Rolling REVISED 07/22/14 DO NOT REMOVE THIS. IT NEEDS TO STAY IN FOR THE CONTRACTORS. SP

RAMS of train and infrastructure using the TELE-DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM of the NEW ETR 1000

Asphalt Pavement Construction Update

LAPPING OR GRINDING? WHICH TECHNOLOGY IS THE RIGHT CHOICE IN THE AGE OF INDUSTRY 4.0?

Design and Calibration of the Jaguar XK Adaptive Cruise Control System. Tim Jagger MathWorks International Automotive Conference 2006

FRA High Speed Adjustable Perturbation Slab Track

F-53 MOTORHOME ISSUE

Unternehmensportrait. High Pole Servo. Stepper Motor basics vs. High Pole Servo

S&C: Understanding Root Causes & Assessing Effective Remedies C4R Final Dissemination Event, Paris 15 th March 2017

Vehicle Simulation for Engine Calibration to Enhance RDE Performance

Modification of IPG Driver for Road Robustness Applications

B737 Performance. Takeoff & Landing. Last Rev: 02/06/2004

DEVELOPMENT OF PROFILER- BASED RIDEABILITY SPECIFICATIONS FOR ASPHALT PAVEMENTS AND ASPHALT OVERLAYS

Explanatory Note to Decision 2017/017/R

Performance of Rear Differential Depending on Vehicle Driving Mode

Performance Based Track Geometry: Optimizing Transit System Maintenance

Airport Pavement Behavior, Performance and Management System

EFFECT OF PAVEMENT CONDITIONS ON FUEL CONSUMPTION, TIRE WEAR AND REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE COSTS

ANALYZING THE DYNAMICS OF HIGH SPEED RAIL

Evaluation of Grind and Groove (Next Generation Concrete Surface) Pilot Projects in California

AGSF GUIDANCE SIGNS. FAA Incandescent Airfield Guidance Sign. Features. Compliance with Standards. Uses. Sign Legends

Pedestrian Autonomous Emergency Braking Test Protocol (Version II) February 2019

Runway Grooving and Skid Resistance

A310 AIRCRAFT PREPARATION FOR COLD WEATHER OPERATION FCOM>>Procedure and Techniques >>Inclement Weather Operation

Headlight Test and Rating Protocol (Version I)

BMAA FLIGHT TEST PLAN BMAA/AW/010a issue 2 Reg: Type: TADS or MAAN applying:

SUMMARY OF STANDARD K&C TESTS AND REPORTED RESULTS

Study on System Dynamics of Long and Heavy-Haul Train

Boeing /-200/-200A Limitations

West Virginia Department of Transportation Division of Highways

Prototyping Collision Avoidance for suas

Implementation and application of Simpackmulti-attribute vehicle models at Toyota Motor Europe

A Short History of Real World Testing; What have we learnt?

Innovative Warm Mix Asphalt Projects: The Contractor s Perspective

Transcription:

RUNWAY ROUGHNESS CONSIDERATIONS SWIFT 2013 Chris Olidis, P.Eng.

PRESENTATION OUTLINE A general overview of runway roughness Assessing roughness for new construction Assessing roughness of in service runways using the Boeing Bump Index Features that can influence roughness

WHY IS ROUGHNESS IMPORTANT Affects aircraft performance during take off and landing Dynamic forces from rough pavement can accelerate fatigue damage to aircraft components Dynamic loading reduces pavement life To a lesser extent, user complaints from pilots and passengers

NEW CONSTRUCTION Roughness is an indicator of construction quality Build a pavement smoother, it stays smoother longer Roughness for acceptance of new construction is typically measured with a straight edge

STRAIGHT EDGE ACCEPTANCE TESTING Transport Canada The surface of a finished pavement shall be within 5 mm of the design grade, but not uniformly high or low and shall have no irregularities exceeding 5mm when checked with a 4.5 m straight edge placed in any direction. FAA The finished surface of the final course of pavement shall not vary more than ¼ inch when evaluated with a 16 foot straightedge.

STRAIGHT EDGE

CALIFORNIA PROFILOGRAPH An FAA additional/optional acceptance test The Contractor shall furnish a 25 foot wheel base California type profilograph and competent operator to measure pavement surface deviations. The profile index will be determined in accordance with ASTM E 1274 using a 0.2-inch blanking band. Within each 1/10th mile subsection, all areas represented by high points having a deviation in excess of 0.4 inch in 25 feet or less shall be removed by the contractor using an approved equipment

CALIFORNIA PROFILOGRAPH

ACCEPTANCE OF NEW CONSTRUCTION From an operational perspective, aircraft are not affected by such small wavelength deviations Is acceptance based on straight edge or PI too conservative? Roughness is an indicator of construction quality Build a pavement smoother, it stays smoother longer

TYPES OF ROUGHNESS Discrete bumps create impact loading that can accelerate fatigue damage, as well as rattle equipment, crew, and passengers Repeated large wavelength bumps can induce harmonics and can accelerate fatigue damage to both the aircraft and the pavement Repeated short wavelength bumps can cause heat build up in struts/suspension

RIDE COMFORT INDEX Historical Transport Canada method was the ride comfort index (RCI) Subjective rating of ride quality by a panel of raters using passenger vehicle driving at 80 km/hr 0 (very poor) to 10 (very good) Pilot complaints expected when RCI < 5 Aircraft suspension designed for landing not ride quality

RUNWAY PROFILE MEASUREMENT There are various equipment types to efficiently and objectively measure runway profiles Contact (walking inclinometer) profilers DipStick, SurPRO, etc Non-contact (inertial) profilers Lightweight and high speed laser

LIGHTWEIGHT AND HIGH SPEED PROFILERS

RUNWAY DATA ARA had a database of profile measurements from a number of runways The profile data was processed using the ProFAA software developed by FAA The Boeing Bump Index was the measure used for profile assessment

DATA COLLECTION Longitudinal profile measurements were completed with a ICC SurPRO 2000 The equipment is portable and fully automated Includes 2 inclinometers, 1 optical distance encoder and a temperature sensor Meets World Bank Class 1 requirements for profiling devices

DATA COLLECTION PLAN Profile measurements were completed along the centreline, as well as 3.0 and 5.25 m offsets SurPRO was modified to include a laser target sensor to ensure operator maintains constant offset from centreline After initial warm up, the equipment inclinometers were calibrated by closed loop survey All data collected at speeds below 4 kph.

PROFILE INDICES ProFAA can simulate the following indices Straight Edge Profile Index (PI) International Roughness Index (IRI) RMS Bandpass Boeing Bump

BOEING BUMP METHOD D6-81746 Runway Roughness Measurement, Quantification and Application The Boeing Method FAA AC 150/5380-9 Guidelines and Procedures for Measuring Airfield Pavement Roughness The method is user friendly Does not consider detailed analysis of aircraft response

BOEING BUMP METHOD Measures the deviation from a virtual straightedge to the pavement surface

BOEING ROUGHNESS CRITERIA

BOEING BUMP INDEX Considers a virtual straight edge bump length from 0.5 m to 120 m Boeing Bump Index (BBI) is determined by calculating a ratio of the measured bump height to the limit of acceptable bump height, for each straight edge length BBI < 1 is considered acceptable BBI > 1 is considered excessive or unacceptable

BBI CRITERIA

PRIMARY RUNWAY SITE 1 BBI Acceptable

CROSSWIND RUNWAY SITE 1

CROSSWIND RUNWAY SITE 1

BBI ANALYSIS SITE 1 Bump Peak (Station 0+390) Depression Peak (Station 0+417)

RUNWAY ANALYSIS SITE 2 ACP Runway - PCC Ends

RUNWAY ANALYSIS SITE 2

RUNWAY ANALYSIS SITE 3

RUNWAY ANALYSIS SITE 3

RUNWAY ANALYSIS SITE 3

RUNWAY ROUGHNESS CONSIDERATIONS Runway intersections can be challenging to ensure a smooth pavement and maintain drainage Seasonal freeze thaw and permafrost degradation Post construction related settlement of embankment and underground services Pavement deterioration

COMMON CAUSES OF ROUGHNESS

COMMON CAUSES OF ROUGHNESS

COMMON CAUSES OF ROUGHNESS

COMMON CAUSES OF ROUGHNESS

COMMON CAUSES OF ROUGHNESS

COMMON CAUSES OF ROUGHNESS

QUESTIONS