What We Heard Report - Metro Line NW LRT

Similar documents
What We Heard. Edmontonians in communities Northwest of City Centre share their vision of the Metro Line NW LRT Expansion

Welcome. Metro Line Northwest LRT Expansion Project

1 Downtown LRT Connector: Draft Concept

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

Welcome The City has undertaken a naming exercise for the existing and future LRT lines. The SE to West LRT, as the project has been called to date,

state, and federal levels, complete reconstruction and expansion of I35 in the near future is not likely.

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

Green Line LRT: Beltline Segment Update April 19, 2017

2.4 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Support the revitalization of urban cores STRATEGIC DIRECTION

June 8, Prepared by Urban Systems Ltd.

Welcome. Green Line in Your Community

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

MARTA s blueprint for the future. COFFEE AND CONVERSATION Kyle Keahey, More MARTA Atlanta Dec. 5, 2018

Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions

THE WAY WE MOVE LRT FOR EVERYONE

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

MAR1011. West Birmingham Bus Network Review March 2010

MOTION NO. M Preferred Alternative for the Puyallup Station Access Improvement Project

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

Attachment 5. High Speed Transit Planning Study REPORT SUMMARY. Prepared by: City of Edmonton Transportation Planning Branch. Stantec Consulting Ltd.

Public Meeting. March 21, 2013 Mimosa Elementary School

Pedestrians, Cars, Buses and Trains? Considerations for Rapid Transit Service at Western University

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

Garrett Hill Master Plan

Draft Results and Recommendations

Puyallup Station Access Improvements Project

Scarborough Transit Planning

Bus Stop Optimization Study

On June 11, 2012, the Park Board approved the installation of three electric vehicle charging stations along Beach Avenue.

Preliminary Alternatives Analysis Caltrain Modernization & High Speed Train Projects City of Millbrae

SamTrans Business Plan Update May 2018

BIRMINGHAM CONNECTED Anne Shaw Tuesday 20 January 2015

Technological Viability Evaluation. Results from the SWOT Analysis Diego Salzillo Arriaga, Siemens

Attachment 5 Eglinton West LRT Planning and Technical Update

Draft Results and Open House

Transit Vehicle (Trolley) Technology Review

Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

2.1 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Expand regional rapid transit networks STRATEGIC DIRECTION

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

Electric Vehicle Charging Station Installation and Eco-Pass Updates. Report Prepared by: A. Rolston, Parking Operations Coordinator

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Welcome to Open House #5 Scarborough Rapid Transit

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Respecting the Rules Better Road Safety Enforcement in the European Union. ACEA s Response

PROJECT BACKGROUND 3

East Turnaround. Access to Ayreswood Avenue would be restricted to right-in/rightout movements under the proposed Rapid Transit plan.

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Policy Advisory Committee Meeting February 12, 2014

Executive Summary. Phase 2 Evaluation Report. Introduction

Point A Point B Point C Point D. Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017

WELCOME. Nanaimo Harbour and Gabriola Island Terminal Development Plans (TDPs)

Commercial Distributor Incentive Project: Regional Roll-Out

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

MEDIA RELEASE. June 16, 2008 For Immediate Release

Newmarket GO Station Mobility Hub Study. Open House #1 MAY 18, 2017

SH 249 IN GRIMES COUNTY. Open House April 3, 2014

ULTRA LOW EMISSIONS ZONE CONSULTATION LONDON COUNCILS RESPONSE

DRAFT Subject to modifications

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN RICHMOND HILL

Procurement notes for councils (Scotland)

Rapid Transit Implementation Working Group #4 February 9, 2017

Recommended Vision for the Downtown Rapid Transit Network

Strategy for Promoting Centers of Excellence (CoE) Activities

Sunnyside Yard Master Plan. RFQ Information Session September 13, 2017

Final Administrative Decision

Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0 Project Overview. Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0 Mobilitätsbeirat Hamburg 01. July 2015

San Rafael Transit Center. Update. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District Transportation Committee of the Board of Directors

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS AT PUBLIC OPEN HOUSES SCOPING OF ALTERNATIVES GATEWAY CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

What is the Connector?

2013/2014 Strategic Priorities Fund Application Overview

Tempe Streetcar. March 2, 2016

BMW GROUP DIALOGUE. HANGZHOU 2017 TAKE AWAYS.

Low-Speed Autonomous Shuttle Project Summary

Appendix C. Parking Strategies

Ottawa LRT Stage 2. McKellar Park Information Session

Supports Item No. 1 T&T Committee Agenda October 5, 2010

WELCOME. North Central LRT Open Houses. June 11, Ascension of Our Lord School June 12, Winston Heights June 13, Thorncliffe Community Hall

and Members of Municipal Council City of Niagara Falls, Ontario Mewburn Road Speed Control Review

2/1/2018. February 1, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Halifax Commuter Rail: A Fresh Concept

Proposed FY2015 Budget and Fare Increase

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

2015 AER Survey of Albertans and Stakeholders. Executive Summary

JTA S MOBILITY CORRIDORS. Improving System Performance Through Urban Design

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Location Concept Plan Amendment Recommendation Approved 2011 Concept Plan

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN WATERLOO REGION

Chapter 4. Design and Analysis of Feeder-Line Bus. October 2016

Snelling Bus Rapid Transit. May 13, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1

Mr. Leif Dormsjo Director, District Department of Transportation 55 M Street, SE Washington, DC July 10, Dear Director Dormsjo,

Scarborough Subway Extension. Stakeholder Advisory Meeting February 28, 2017

10-Year Vision Update. Vancouver City Council May 2, 2017

Executive Summary October 2013

Transportation Infrastructure Investment Program moving

Curbing emissions and energy consumption in the transport sector how can we deal with it in Warsaw 2012 Annual POLIS Conference

US 50/SOUTH SHORE COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION PROJECT

Transcription:

What We Heard Report - Metro Line NW LRT by Metro Line NW LRT Project Team LRT Projects City of Edmonton April 11, 2018

Project / Initiative Background Name Date Location Metro Line Northwest Light Rail Transit (LRT) Extension Public Open Houses January 23 & 25, 2018 January 23, 2018 - Castle Downs YMCA January 25, 2015 - Shaw Theatre Lobby, NAIT Level of Public Engagement Advise

Description The Metro Line NW LRT Extension is part of the City of Edmonton s Transportation Master Plan, The Way We Move, vision. By 2040, the City will have expanded LRT service to all sectors of the city. Part of this vision includes extending the current Metro Line from NAIT to Campbell Road. Benefits of extending this line include improving mobility and access to existing and new neighbourhoods in the north and northwest sections of the city, including the city of St. Albert. This project was first introduced to the public between February and July of 2009, when the City of Edmonton launched a study to evaluate potential Northwest LRT corridors. Public opinion on potential routes was gathered through online questionnaires, workshops and public hearings. A final proposal for the corridor was developed after consideration of public input, results from a technical analysis and the City s LRT route evaluation criteria. The Edmonton City Council approved the corridor for the Northwest LRT in July of 2009, and added this corridor to the Transportation Systems Bylaw. In 2011 and 2012, concept planning was initiated with input gathered from key internal and external stakeholders, including directly impacted residents, businesses and the communities in which they live and operate to assist with the concept planning phase of the project. In 2016, funding became available to proceed with the Concept Plan Validation and Preliminary Engineering phases of the project. In 2017, the City of Edmonton began the Concept Plan Validation phase of public engagement for the Metro Line NW LRT Extension project. The first stage of engagement on the Concept Plan Validation phase was an opportunity to reintroduce the extension project to the community, to gather input to help finalize the concept and allow the project team to proceed with the preliminary design.the finalized Concept Plan was reviewed and approved by City of Edmonton LRT Delivery. In keeping with the City s vision of more transit-oriented communities,the Metro Line NW LRT Extension project team recognizes the importance of talking with residents and business owners who reside in the northwest region of the city. We want to hear what people think about the LRT and understand the considerations that may require attention during the planning process. In order to meet this standard, a number of stakeholder meetings and public events have been planned to gather feedback, with Phase One engagement starting in May 2017, and Phase Two engagement commencing in January 2018.

SUMMARY The initial outreach to stakeholders and the public in May 2017 proved valuable for understanding the level of community awareness and knowledge about the project. It also helped the project team identify specific concerns and considerations related to the alignment, LRT operations, and the role of LRT in contributing to the sustainability and livability of communities. These determinations helped to focus engagement efforts for the second stage of the engagement process. In January 2018, Phase 2 of the public open houses were held with stakeholders and residents along the approved Metro Line NW LRT alignment. These public engagement sessions focused on the Phase One concept plan. Participants were asked to advise on the following: 1. Preferences for grade separations at key locations 2. Preference for the level of design for Express Bus Service 3. Any issues or concerns associated with placement of the alignment, such as traffic movements, pedestrian/cycling realm, noise/visual impacts, access to transit service, potential impacts on surrounding land uses, etc. 4. Overall level of interest and support for the project at this stage Through conversations and written feedback, participants shared their level of support of the Metro Line extension. Residents and stakeholders along the alignment understand the benefit LRT will bring to the communities northwest of the city centre. While overall the response is positive, participants would like to see that the lessons learned from previous LRT projects are taken into account when building future infrastructure, and that LRT is integrated well with existing transportation infrastructure and communities. The results from this second stage of public engagement will be used by the project team to fine-tune the station design and grade separation elements of the project. WHAT WAS DONE The Metro Line NW LRT Extension Phase Two open houses were held between January 23 and January 25, 2018, attracting approximately 350 attendees. Three events were held at two locations, Castle Downs Family YMCA and NAIT, within the LRT corridor. Attendees were asked to circulate through a series of panels that were displayed, each one representing an element of the project. At each panel, a member of the project team was available to engage in conversation and answer questions. In addition to the panels, one interactive station was set up to obtain participant input on intersection crossing options, station design, and identification of key destinations and access routes to LRT stations in their community. Focus was placed on station design and grade separation. Team members gathered input through conversations with participants and feedback forms were provided and collected as participants left the event.

In the weeks that followed the Metro Line NW LRT Extension Phase Two open houses, the feedback collected was compiled and evaluated. This information was shared in the report that was presented to City Council on March 21, 2018. RESULTS AND FINDINGS The summary below identifies the areas of interest, listed in alphabetical order, that were highlighted by the public at the three public engagement sessions. Participants were provided with a range of engagement channels to share their interests including Post-It notes and feedback forms. In addition, project team members conducted conversations with participants that were summarized in written form post-event. Themes identified from topics of discussion: Access to Stations Many attendees emphasized the importance of integrating LRT with existing transportation infrastructure to promote and facilitate its use; for example, expanding networks of small buses or shuttles that would feed into LRT stations and transit hubs. Bridge Crossing When asked whether they preferred the proposed bridge crossing of the CN Rail Walker Yard to be built closer to homes on 113A street, or to take a larger amount of land from Lauderdale Park (particularly the dog park), a significant majority of attendees were in favour of the latter option ( Second Option ). Several comments, however, emphasized the importance of preserving the dog park as much as possible. Express Bus Service Two thirds of responses to the feedback form were in favour of the use of express buses as an interim transit service until LRT construction is completed. Only a small number of attendees indicated that while they were in favour of its implementation they would not consider using express buses themselves. Of the three options for express bus operations, Option 3 express buses operating in dedicated lanes received a plurality of support. Grade separation Overall, attendees were supportive with their feedback form ratings of the concept of grade separation in some form. Many were strongly in favour of the trench concept. Personal safety was identified as a high priority for the vast majority of attendees. Station access and integration of the grade separations with local communities was also emphasized. Cost differences between the options were of little

importance to most attendees, and the general attitude suggested that the expense would be worth the benefits. Parking Parking was a significant matter of concern for many attendees, both with regard to potentially insufficient or expensive parking facilities at LRT stations, and the loss of existing spaces (e.g. residential parking space near future LRT infrastructure sites). Some expressed concerns that without abundant and affordable parking, they would be unlikely to make extensive use of LRT. Range of service A number of attendees were concerned that LRT development may not be accessible to their community (e.g. St. Albert). One individual suggested that if communities such as St. Albert are to benefit from future LRT projects, they should contribute to the development and maintenance costs. Safety Safety was a recurring theme amongst attendees in a variety of categories. For the questions of station design and grade separation, safety received more ratings of high importance than any of the other options. Several comments suggest that the trench concept is viewed as being a considerably safer option than the alternative grading possibilities. Speed A small number of attendees suggested that LRT should be focused on speed, abandoning urban-friendly speed limits and stopping less frequently. Station design In the feedback form provided, participants were asked to prioritize their interests in level of importance. Safety was rated the highest of importance with regards to LRT station design, followed closely by accessibility, and location within the communities along the alignment. Station design and aesthetics were of little importance to attendees. Other priorities highlighted included avoiding impacts to vehicle traffic, potential noise impacts, and ensuring that sufficient (and free) parking is available. Timing Disappointment was expressed by some attendees over the age of 65 that the LRT project was unlikely to be completed within their lifetimes (or in time for them to make considerable use of it).

Traffic Concerns about the impact of LRT on traffic congestion were raised, with attendees primarily addressing the ramifications of at-grade LRT operations and station development. Feedback suggests that many attendees consider grade separation of major intersections and stations to be a viable option to minimize impacts on traffic congestion, despite the associated higher costs. WHAT S NEXT In the coming months, the project team will be continuing their work on the detailed infrastructure design, which will result in the project moving into the procurement phase when funding becomes available. The next opportunity for stakeholders and the public to get involved will be this summer through a series of pop-up events and at public open houses during the Final Concept phase in fall 2018. The focus of the events will be to provide an opportunity to review the final recommendations for the project and provide input. Input collected at this final stage will be one contributing component in a series of criteria that will assist the project team in refining details and making their final recommendations to City Council this fall. Thank you for participating in sharing your voice and shaping our city. For more information on City of Edmonton public engagement, please visit www.edmonton.ca/publicengagement.