Evaluating The Relevancy Of Current Crash Test Guidelines For Roadside Safety Barriers On High Speed Roads

Similar documents
EVALUATING THE RELEVANCY OF CURRENT CRASH TEST GUIDELINES FOR ROADSIDE SAFETY BARRIERS ON HIGH SPEED ROADS

MASH 2016 Implementation: What, When and Why

Advances in Simulating Corrugated Beam Barriers under Vehicular Impact

Median Barriers in North Carolina -- Long Term Evaluation. Safety Evaluation Group Traffic Safety Systems Management Section

Median Barriers in North Carolina

1962: HRCS Circular 482 one-page document, specified vehicle mass, impact speed, and approach angle for crash tests.

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (15-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

Development of a Finite Element Model of a Motorcycle

Road User Cost Analysis

Investigation of Potential Mitigation of Driver Injury in Heavy Truck Frontal and Rollover Crashes

Guardrail/Bridgerail Recommendations for Very Low Volume Local Roads in Kansas

Improving Roadside Safety by Computer Simulation

SUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE PAVEMENT PROJECTS 2015 TxAPA Annual Meeting September 23, 2015 Austin District Mike Arellano, P.E. Date

A MASH Compliant W-Beam Median Guardrail System

ACCIDENT MODIFICATION FACTORS FOR MEDIAN WIDTH

FHWA Motorcycle Crash Causation Study

Crash Testing Growth Common Roadside Hardware Systems Draft FHWA and AASHTO Requirements for Implementing MASH 2015

Recent Transportation Projects

National Center for Statistics and Analysis Research and Development

TTI TRAFFIC SAFETY CONFERENCE. John A. Barton, P.E.

AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware, AASHTO/FHWA Joint Implementation Plan Standing Committee on Highways September 24, 2015

SJTPO TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS 2005: OCCUPANTS. TRENDS IN OCCUPANT FATALITIES Seatbelt Use; Occupant Ejected

Traffic Accident Statistics

Michigan. Traffic. Profile

Assessing Options for Improving Roadside Barrier Crashworthiness

Michigan State Police (MSP) Traffic Safety Network Traverse Bay Area

Guide Rail Safety Symposium

Update to NCHRP Report 350. Current Safety Issues

Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware

Michigan. Traffic. Profile

TRACC. Trinity Attenuating Crash Cushion

DISTRIBUTION AND CHARACTERISTICS OF CRASHES AT DIFFERENT LOCATIONS WITHIN WORK ZONES IN VIRGINIA

OPPORTUNITIES FOR REDUCTION OF FATALITIES IN VEHICLE-GUARDRAIL COLLISIONS

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

D1.3 FINAL REPORT (WORKPACKAGE SUMMARY REPORT)

In-service Performance Evaluation of Cable Median Barriers on Florida s Limited Access Facilities

1999 Missouri State Highway System. Missouri Department of Transportation - Transportation Management Systems

Van Buren County Traffic Crash Data & Year Trends. Reporting Criteria

Vehicle Safety Risk Assessment Project Overview and Initial Results James Hurnall, Angus Draheim, Wayne Dale Queensland Transport

Pole Side Impact GTR: Assessment of Safety Need: Updated Data Collection

IN-SERVICE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF POST-AND-BEAM GUARDRAILS IN CONNECTICUT, IOWA AND NORTH CAROLINA

Act 229 Evaluation Report

Purpose and Need Report

National Center for Statistics and Analysis Research and Development

The Emerging Risk of Fatal Motorcycle Crashes with Guardrails

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

SAFETY EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION OF THE CABLE RAIL SYSTEMS IN TENNESSEE

Kent County Traffic Crash Data & Year Trends. Reporting Criteria

Developing a Portable and Reliable Data Collection System for Evaluating Driver Behavior around Law Enforcement TRAVIS TERRY DR.

Illinois Safety Program IDOT District ATSSA Workshop

s MEDIAN BARRIERS FOR TEXAS HIGHWAYS

Passenger Dies When Semi-Truck Trailer Hits Cow In Roadway Incident Number: 05KY089

The Evolution of Side Crash Compatibility Between Cars, Light Trucks and Vans

Evaluation of the In-Service Safety Performance of Safety-Shape and Vertical Concrete Barriers

Implementation of AASHTO s Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) 2016

SAFETY PERFORMANCE OF WORK-ZONE DEVICES UNDER MASH TESTING

Lidia Kostyniuk, Ph.D., P.E. Truck Talk April, 28, 2010

Market Safety in ASEAN Region

SUMMARY CHANGES FOR NCHRP REPORT 350 GUIDELINES [NCHRP (02)] Keith A. Cota, Chairman Technical Committee on Roadside Safety June 14, 2007

Collision Analysis Safety Tables

ANALYSIS OF CROSS-MEDIAN CRASHES ON ALABAMA DIVIDED PARTIAL CONTROL OF ACCESS ARTERIALS

Road Safety s Mid Life Crisis The Trends and Characteristics for Middle Aged Controllers Involved in Road Trauma

Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia 3rd Street Tunnel at Massachusetts Avenue Exit

D-25 Speed Advisory System

VERIFICATION & VALIDATION REPORT of MGS Barrier Impact with 1100C Vehicle Using Toyota Yaris Coarse FE Model

March 2, 2017 Integrating Transportation Planning, Project Development, and Project Programming

Michigan State Police (MSP) Post 21 - Metro North

June Safety Measurement System Changes

Michigan State Police (MSP) Post 21 - Metro North

Traffic Safety Network Huron Valley

NCDOT Report on Improving Safety on Secondary Roads

TABLE OF CONTENTS CRASHES.. VI TRENDS. VII

National Road Safety Action Plan in China

Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-09/

RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT

Follow this and additional works at:

ROADWAY INJURY EXPERIENCE FOR PERSONS WHO HAD BEEN DRINKING AND/OR USING DRUGS

ANALYTICAL EVALUATION OF TEXAS BRIDGE RAILS TO CONTAIN BUSES AND TRUCKS

Evaluation of Barriers for Very High Speed Roadways

DEFLECTION LIMITS FOR TEMPORARY CONCRETE BARRIERS

VULCAN BARRIER TL-3 GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS

Roadway Contributing Factors in Traffic Crashes

Florida s Turnpike Enterprise High Tension Median Cable Barrier Pilot Project. William H. Cook, P.E. Florida s Turnpike Assistant Roadway Engineer

POLICY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND POSTING OF SPEED LIMITS ON COUNTY AND TOWNSHIP HIGHWAYS WITHIN MCHENRY COUNTY, ILLINOIS

WRONG WAY DRIVING. Ugonna U. Ughanze, P.E. Houston District

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION. X-Tension DS. is suitable for all road types: Motorways, country roads, city streets for speed categories up to 110 km/h.

CRITICAL FLARE RATES FOR W-BEAM GUARDRAIL DETERMINING MAXIMUM CAPACITY USING COMPUTER SIMULATION NCHRP 17-20(3)

Log Truck Accidents in the United States

KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CENTER

Understanding Traffic Data: How To Avoid Making the Wrong Turn

Impaired Driving and Ignition Interlocks

Table of Contents. Procedures for Locally Establishing Speed Limits. Chapter 30

State Highway 32 East TIGER Discretionary Grant Application APPENDIX C - BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS REPORT

Roadside Safety MASH

Figure 15. Yearly Trend in Death Rates for Motor Vehicle Transport: NSW, Year

Effectiveness of Median Cable Barriers and Rumble Strips

Speeding and Speed Enforcement: Turning Knowledge Into Action

Washtenaw County Traffic Crash Data & Year Trends. Reporting Criteria

Washtenaw County Traffic Crash Data & Year Trends. Reporting Criteria

Conventional Approach

Transcription:

Evaluating The Relevancy Of Current Crash Test Guidelines For Roadside Safety Barriers On High Speed Roads Connie Xavier Dominique Lord Chiara Dobrovolny Roger Bligh TRB 1 st International Roadside Safety Conference June 12-15, 2017

Acknowledgements Texas Department of Transportation Marcie Perez, TTI Undergraduate Research Scholars Program Mike Pratt, TTI Texas A&M GIS Department

Introduction Higher speed limits across the United States

Introduction MASH testing criteria Test Level 3: passenger vehicles impacting at 25 and 62 mph (High speed roads) Impact speed is 85th percentile impact speed of real-world crashes

Introduction Past research showed that the impact angle does not vary greatly with functional class Computer simulations and full-scale crash tests have found stability concerns with higher speed impacts

Do high speed roads influence the severity of injuries? Does injury severity factor significantly increase as posted speed limit increases for real world accidents against barriers? If yes, further study to determine impact conditions on highways over 75 mph could be warranted.

Study Objective 75 mph 80 mph 70 mph Compare Injury Severity 85 mph

Approach Step 1 Obtain Crash Data Step 2 Step 3 Summary of Data Crash Severity Analysis Plots of Crashes Statistical Significance

Limitations Information on actual impact speed not provided in crash databases (need crash reconstruction and police reports) No investigation on impact orientation Mostly observation between impact severity and posted speed limit Is high injury severity due to barrier failure to safely redirect vehicle? Is high injury severity related to higher impact speed during crash? Is 62 mph testing speed appropriate for hardware design for very high speeds?

1. Obtain Crash Data TxDOT s CRIS crash database Data was filtered: 2010-2013 single-vehicle single-occupant run-off-road crashes posted speed limit of and greater than 70 mph first harmful event being a roadside safety barrier Concrete traffic barrier, guardrail, median barrier, retaining wall, bridge rail

2. Summary of Data Number of Barrier Crashes by Speed Limit and Year. 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total No Speed Limit Data 4 5 63 288 360 70 mph 1601 1696 1795 1442 6534 75 mph 7 27 910 2012 2956 80 mph 14 23 51 106 194 85 mph - - - 14 14 Total 1626 1751 2819 3862 10058

2. Summary of Data Number of Barrier Crashes by Speed Limit and Year. 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total No Speed Limit Data 4 5 63 288 360 70 mph 1601 1696 1795 1442 6534 75 mph 7 27 910 2012 2956 80 mph 14 23 51 106 194 85 mph - - - 14 14 Total 1626 1751 2819 3862 10058

2. Summary of Data Number of Barrier Crashes for Each Roadway System. 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total 70 75 80 70 75 80 70 75 80 70 75 80 Alternate 1 - - 1 - - - - - 6 - - 8 Business Interstate 3 - - 1 - - 3 - - 1 - - 8 Business US - - - - - - 1 - - 4 - - 5 County Road - - - - - - 1 - - - - - 1 Farm to Market 55 - - 52 - - 71 1-81 6-266 Interstate 739 4 14 780 14 23 560 814 38 355 1359 89 4789 Local Road/Street 6 - - 9 - - 7 2-14 4-42 Ranch Road 1 - - 1 - - - 26-1 - - 29 Spur 1 - - 2 - - - - - - 2-5 State Highway 179 - - 194 3-321 - 7 216 214 13 1147 State Loop 38 - - 37 1-54 2-82 11-225 Toll Road 286 - - 296 5-292 9 6 336 29 18 1276 US Highway 292 3-323 4-485 56-346 387-1896 Total 1601 7 14 1696 27 23 1795 910 51 1442 2012 120 9698

2. Summary of Data Number of Barrier Crashes for Each Roadway System. 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total 70 75 80 70 75 80 70 75 80 70 75 80 Alternate 1 - - 1 - - - - - 6 - - 8 Business Interstate 3 - - 1 - - 3 - - 1 - - 8 Business US - - - - - - 1 - - 4 - - 5 County Road - - - - - - 1 - - - - - 1 Farm to Market 55 - - 52 - - 71 1-81 6-266 Interstate 739 4 14 780 14 23 560 814 38 355 1359 89 4789 Local Road/Street 6 - - 9 - - 7 2-14 4-42 Ranch Road 1 - - 1 - - - 26-1 - - 29 Spur 1 - - 2 - - - - - - 2-5 State Highway 179 - - 194 3-321 - 7 216 214 13 1147 State Loop 38 - - 37 1-54 2-82 11-225 Toll Road 286 - - 296 5-292 9 6 336 29 18 1276 US Highway 292 3-323 4-485 56-346 387-1896 Total 1601 7 14 1696 27 23 1795 910 51 1442 2012 120 9698

2. Summary of Data Conclusions: 1. 3 Speed Limit Categories 70 mph 75 mph 80 mph 2. Crashes on State Highways and Interstates

3. Crash Severity Analysis Injury Severity Color Scale Color Injury Severity Fatal Incapacitating Injury Non-Incapacitating Injury Possible Injury Property Damage Only K A B C O

2010 70 mph 2011 70 mph K A B C O 2012 70 mph 2013 70 mph

2010 75 mph 2011 75 mph K A B C O 2012 75 mph 2013 75 mph

2010 80 mph 2011 80 mph K A B C O 2012 80 mph 2013 80 mph

% of total crashes Results of Crash Severity Analysis % of total crashes 100 80 60 40 20 0 100 80 60 40 20 0 2010 15.38 2.99 70 mph 75 mph 80 mph 2012 11.11 2.58 2.91 70 mph 75 mph 80 mph % of total crashes % of total crashes K + A B C O 100 80 60 40 20 0 100 80 60 40 20 0 2011 4.18 8.7 70 mph 75 mph 80 mph 2013 3.9 4.04 6.93 70 mph 75 mph 80 mph

Crash Severity Percentages K+A percentage category consistently increases from 70 mph to 80 mph posted speed limit roads for all years Years that did report a K+A injury severity on 75 mph roads showed an increase in K+A severity as the posted speed limit increased There was a decrease in the percentage of PDO crashes on 70 mph roads to 80 mph roads for years 2010-2012, suggesting that more crashes resulted in more severe injuries

Results of Crash Severity Analysis Combined Data for Years 2010-2013 % of total crashes 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2010-2013 3.38 3.61 8.79 70 mph 75 mph 80 mph K+A B C O

Conclusions Plots of crashes showed that the fatal and incapacitating injuries are not concentrated in one particular area, but some highways experienced more severe injuries consistently for consecutive years The K+A percentages between the 70 mph and 80 mph were not statistically different at the 5% significance level for every year Can be attributed to the small sample size issue The K+A percentages for the combined 2010-2013 data showed significance at the 5% level between 70 mph and 80 mph posted speed limit roads Shows possibility that the severity of injuries increases as the posted speed limit increases

Future Work Look at police reports Individually define injuries Look at the manner the vehicle hit the barrier Reconstruction of crashes to find impact speed Look at data for more years once they become available Develop a baseline to compare the trend in injury severities of lower speed ranges (less than 70 mph) to higher speed ranges Look at severity of injury by roadside barrier type in greater details

Questions?