SMOOTH PAVEMENTS LAST LONGER! Diamond Grinding THE ULTIMATE QUESTION! Rigid Pavement Design Equation. Preventive Maintenance 2 Session 2 2-1

Similar documents
Non-Destructive Pavement Testing at IDOT. LaDonna R. Rowden, P.E. Pavement Technology Engineer

MN Roads Low Volume Road Testing to Validate the Purdue TPTA Textures and Predicted Joint Effects

Darwin-ME Status and Implementation Efforts_IAC09

The effect of grinding and grooving on the noise generation of Portland Cement Concrete pavement

Evaluation of Grind and Groove (Next Generation Concrete Surface) Pilot Projects in California

Pavement Thickness Design Parameter Impacts

DESCRIPTION This work consists of measuring the smoothness of the final concrete or bituminous surface.

Table Standardized Naming Convention for ERD Files

Impact of Environment-Friendly Tires on Pavement Damage

PN 420-7/18/ SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS

Research Update Construction Conference Charles Holzschuher, P.E. February 3, Florida Department of Transportation

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...

2018 NACE Conference Wisconsin Dells, WI. Joseph Cheung P.E. FHWA Office of Safety

Structural Considerations in Moving Mega Loads on Idaho Highways

Rehabilitated PCC Surface Characteristics

High Friction Surfaces and Other Innovative Pavement Surface Treatments for Reduced Highway Noise

METODS OF MEASURING DISTRESS

NCDOT Rideability and IRI Special Provision. Nilesh Neel Surti, PE North Carolina DOT State Pavement Construction Engineer

ASSESSMENT AND EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF PAVEMENT SURFACE FRICTION. Shila Khanal, MASc.,P.Eng. Pavement Engineer

Concrete Airport Pavement Workshop Right Choice, Right Now ACPA SE Chapter Hilton Atlanta Airport November 8, 2012

Use of New High Performance Thin Overlays (HPTO)

PN /21/ SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS

Control of Pavement Smoothness in Kansas

SECTIO N 610 PAVEMENT SMO O THNESS

Ultra-thin Bonded Wearing Course Performance Update, Minnesota

EFFECT OF PAVEMENT CONDITIONS ON FUEL CONSUMPTION, TIRE WEAR AND REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE COSTS

An Update on Smoothness Specifications at ODOT

DEPARTMENTAL RESEARCH

SPECIFICATION FOR SKID RESISTANCE INVESTIGATION AND TREATMENT SELECTION

The INDOT Friction Testing Program: Calibration, Testing, Data Management, and Application

ITEM 585 RIDE QUALITY FOR PAVEMENT SURFACES Description. Measure and evaluate the ride quality of pavement surfaces.

Correcting Low Asphalt Pavement Friction. Brian L. Schleppi OH DOT Office of Technical Services

Louisiana s Experience

Assessing Pavement Rolling Resistance by FWD Time History Evaluation

THE USE OF PERFORMANCE METRICS ON THE PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE

Measuring Pavement Condition Data for a Long-term Pavement Performance Study on New Zealand Roads. D Brown

Measurement of Tire/Pavement Noise

CATEGORY 500 PAVING SECTION 535 PAVEMENT SURFACE PROFILE

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (MEAN ROUGHNESS INDEX ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)

Profiler Certification Program at the NCAT Pavement Test Track. R. Buzz Powell Jason Nelson

TRB Workshop Implementation of the 2002 Mechanistic Pavement Design Guide in Arizona

Profiler Certification Process at the Virginia Smart Road

Frictional properties of longitudinally diamond ground concrete on the A12 Chelmsford bypass

Demonstration Project The Measurement of Pavement Noise on New Jersey Pavements Using the NCAT Noise Trailer

Influence of Hot Mix Asphalt Macrotexture on Skid Resistance

Performance and Safety Enhancements using New Preservation Techniques

Section 6. Ride Specification Special Provisions Step-by-Step Ride Guide for Inspectors and Project Engineers

Pavement Management Index Values Development of a National Standard. Mr. Douglas Frith Mr. Dennis Morian

REHABILITATION DESIGN METHODOLOGY FOR HAUL ROADS ASSOCIATED WITH A WIND FARM DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTHWESTERN ONTARIO

Partial Depth Repair

INLAND NORTHWEST REGIONAL PAVEMENT CUT POLICY

SECTION 602 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SMOOTHNESS

G. P. Ong and T. F. Fwa 1 ANALYSIS OF EFFECTIVENESS OF LONGITUDINAL GROOVING AGAINST HYDROPLANING

FHWA/IN/JTRP-2000/23. Final Report. Sedat Gulen John Nagle John Weaver Victor Gallivan

MnDOT s Experience with IRI Specifications

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (IRI ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)

Runway Grooving and Skid Resistance

If it ain t broke, don t t fix it. HMA Thin Lifts for Pavement Preservation in Tennessee 2008 SEAUPG CONFERENCE-BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA

a road is neither cheap nor fast.

New Jersey Department of Transportation

Single-Vehicle Run-Off-The-Road Incidents: Is The Highway The Cause?

Assessment of pavement damage

Implementation and Thickness Optimization of Perpetual Pavements in Ohio

Reduction of vehicle noise at lower speeds due to a porous open-graded asphalt pavement

Assessment of pavement damage

Evaluation of the Rolling Wheel Deflectometer (RWD) in Louisiana. John Ashley Horne Dr. Mostafa A Elseifi

New Jersey Department of Transportation

What Is and Is Not High Friction Surfacing

Presentation Outline. TRB MEPDG Workshop. Traffic Data & WIM Program. WIM Program in WIM program (prior to MEPDG) Utilizing WIM data

DI Manfred Haider arsenal research. WG leader of PIARC TC 4.2 WG B Road Traffic Noise , Geneva Presentation to UN ECE/TRANS/ WP.

A Crack is a Crack Mn/DOT s Perspective on Cracking in Asphalt Pavements

Implementation Process of Pavement ME Design in Maricopa County 2016 Arizona Pavements/Materials Conference November 17, 2016

RUNWAY ROUGHNESS CONSIDERATIONS. SWIFT 2013 Chris Olidis, P.Eng.

Pavement Surface Properties Consortium Phase II (TPF-5[345])

New Buck O Neil (U. S. 169) Crossing Benefit-Cost Analysis. Kansas City, Missouri

SUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE PAVEMENT PROJECTS 2015 TxAPA Annual Meeting September 23, 2015 Austin District Mike Arellano, P.E. Date

NCHRP Project 1-44: Measuring Tire-Pavement Noise at the Source APPENDIX C. Results of Test Parameter Evaluation

EFFECT OF PAVEMENT CONDITION ON ACCIDENT RATE

Final Report FHWA/IN/JTRP-2003/8 EVALUATION OF INDOT CONSTRUCTION SMOOTHNESS SPECIFICATIONS

SMOOTH MOVING - it's a measure of quality (1st of 3 articles) HMA = Smoothness

8 Crucial Tactics for Asphalt Pavement Protection. Since 1941 // WolfPaving.com

1962: HRCS Circular 482 one-page document, specified vehicle mass, impact speed, and approach angle for crash tests.

Insert the title of your. Recent research on surface texture

CEE 320 Midterm Examination (50 minutes)

Managing the Maintenance of the Runway at Baghdad International Airport

Northeast Pavement Preservation Partnership Burlington, Vermont. Rhode Island DOT

Thomas Bennert, Ph.D. Rutgers University Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation (CAIT)

TIRE DATA GUIDE PIRIT OF DRIVING

Effect Of Heavy Vehicle Weights On Pavement Performance

Road Profile Data Quality Control. The Swedish Model Atlanta, RPUG 2009

High Friction Surfaces In Missouri

Lateral skid resistance in bends

Ride Smoothness Measurement and Specification Issues. Nicholas Vitillo, Ph. D. Manager, Bureau of Research New Jersey Department of Transportation

COMPARING RUTTING PERFORMANCE UNDER A HEAVY VEHICLE SIMULATOR TO RUTTING PERFORMANCE AT THE NCAT PAVEMENT TEST TRACK. Dr. R. Buzz Powell, P.E.

Effect of Load, Tire Pressure, and Tire Type on Flexible Pavement Response

RESULTS OF PHYSICAL WORKSHOP 1 st Australian Runway and Roads Friction Testing Workshop

CHARACTERIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF TRUCK LOAD SPECTRA FOR CURRENT AND FUTURE PAVEMENT DESIGN PRACTICES IN LOUISIANA

- New Superpave Performance Graded Specification. Asphalt Cements

EXISTING PAVEMENT EVALUATION Howell Ferry Road Duluth, Gwinnett County, Georgia. WILLMER ENGINEERING INC. Willmer Project No

July 10, 2007: 14h15: - Session 2c - Infrastructure

Transcription:

THE ULTIMATE QUESTION! Diamond Increased Pavement Performance and Customer Satisfaction Using Diamond How do I make limited budget dollars stretch and provide a highway system that offers a high level of service? /4/005 986-93 Rigid Pavement Design Equation Change in Serviceability Overall Standard Standard Deviation PSI Normal Deviate Depth Log 4.5-.5 Log(ESALs) = Z R * s o +7.35*Log(D+)- 0.06+ +.64*0 7 Modulus of Drainage ( D+ ) 846 Rupture Terminal Coefficient Serviceability 0.75 S' c* Cd *[ D.3] + ( 4.- 0.3p t )* Log 0.75 8.4 5.63* J* D - 05. ( E c /k Load ) Transfer Modulus Modulus of of Elasticity Subgrade Reaction /4/005 3 /4/005 4 SMOOTH PAVEMENTS LAST LONGER! /4/005 5 /4/005 6 Session -

Rough Pavement Smooth Profile wavelength Profile amplitude Profile Wheel Load 7+ kips 8 kips Wheel Load 7+ kips 8 kips Distance /4/005 7 Distance /4/005 8 Diamond /4/005 9 What is Diamond? Removal of thin surface layer of hardened PCC using closely spaced diamond saw blades; Results in smooth, level pavement surface; Longitudinal texture with desirable friction and low noise characteristics; Comprehensive part of any PCC Pavement Preservation program; Frequently performed in conjunction with other CPR techniques, such as full-depth repair, dowel bar retrofit, and joint resealing. /4/005 0 Diamond Cutting Head /4/005 /4/005 Session -

Diamond Machine Diamond Machine /4/005 3 /4/005 4 Diamond /4/005 5 Diamond Was Invented in California Diamond grinding was first used in California in 965 on a 9-year old section of I-0 to eliminate significant faulting (Neal and Woodstrom 976). In 983, CPR was conducted on this same pavement section, including the use of additional grinding to restore the rideability and skid resistance of the surface. In 997, the process was repeated. Since its first use in 965, the use of diamond grinding has grown to become a major element of PCC pavement preservation. 9,500,000 sq yds diamond ground in 999 /4/005 7 MODOT- Safer, Smoother, Sooner MODOT initiates Safer, Smoother, Sooner program in 005 To be completed December 007 The initiative invests $400 million in,00 miles of Missouri s roads that carry 60 percent of the traffic and are within 0 miles of where 86 percent of Missouri s residents live. Improve customer satisfaction through Safer pavements Smoother ride quality Quiet ride quality Approx 8,000,000 sq yds let in st Qtr 005 alone /4/005 8 Session -3

Advantages of Diamond Costs substantially less than AC overlays; Enhances surface friction and safety; Can be accomplished during off-peak hours with short lane closures and without encroaching into adjacent lanes; of one lane does not require grinding of the adjacent lane; Does not affect overhead clearances underneath bridges; Blends patching and other surface irregularities into a consistent, identical surface; Pavement Problems Addressed Faulting at joints and cracks Built-in or construction roughness Polished concrete surface Wheelpath rutting Inadequate transverse slope Unacceptable noise level /4/005 9 /4/005 0 Faulted Joints /4/005 Diamond grinding will significantly increase smoothness over the pre-grind profile! /4/005 3 Session -4

Before & After Polished Surface /4/005 7 /4/005 8 Safety, Surface Texture and Friction Improvement in friction number and skid resistance due to increase in pavement macrotexture Longitudinal texture provides directional stability and reduces hydroplaning (side-force friction) In Wisconsin, overall accident rates for ground surfaces were 40% less than for un-ground surfaces over a 6-year period, 57% in wet weather conditions(drakopoulos et al. 998) /4/005 9 /4/005 30 Session -5

Traffic Control /4/005 3 So what is all this noise about diamond grinding in Arizona?!? /4/005 33 /4/005 34 Diamond Benefits Reported by Arizona DOT - 003 Diamond Effect on Roughness - ADOT Restored smoothness Improved friction Improved cross slope Reduction in noise 58 Percent decrease in IRI Test Area 3 4 Lane 59% 64% Lane 56% 60% Lane 3 53% 55% = Not applicable /4/005 35 /4/005 36 Session -6

Diamond Effect on Friction - ADOT 7 Percent increase in friction Diamond Effect on Tire/Pavement Noise - ADOT Arizona PCCP Noise Generation (Near Field) Test Area 3 4 Lane 5% 4% Lane 5% 35% Lane 3 8% 6% Test Area 3 4 Lane 96.6 98.5 Lane 96.4 95.6 Lane 3 98. 95.5 = Not applicable = Not applicable /4/005 37 /4/005 38 Typical ARFC Noise Research Results - ADOT THE ULTIMATE QUESTION! CPX Noise Levels dba 0 0 00 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 AR_ACFC Noise Levels Versus Pavement Age y = 0.5453x + 93.79 R = 0.5805 0 4 6 8 0 4 Pavement Age The results shown represent the average of twenty projects. The projects were located on I-8, and I-0, and ranged in age from three years to twelve years. The regression indicates approximately a 5 dba increase in noise generation in a ten year period. The current data further indicates that AR-ACFCs typically range from 94 to 99 dba throughout their life. /4/005 39 How do I make limited budget dollars stretch and provide a highway system that offers a high level of service? Diamond Study By ERES Research Data Sources 6 () (4) (0) () 6 (7) 4 () (0) () 5 (0) (5) (6) (3) () () 5 6 (4) 3 4 (7) () 6 (4) 986 FHWA Database created for the study of CPR 33 Diamond Ground sections at 76 sites LTPP SPS-6 CPR database In total 77 sections available for analysis /4/005 4 /4/005 4 Session -7

AASHTO Design Model Prediction vs. Actual Traffic Cost Comparisons CPR in NC and dowel bar retrofit followed by diamond grinding Traffic, million ESALs 60 50 40 30 0 0 0 AASHTO design model prediction (50% reliability) Cumulative traffic (construction to grinding) Total traffic since initial construction FL I-0 AL I-0 NC I-6 SC I-85 GA I-75 GA I-85 Location NC I-6 NC I-6 WA I-90 WA I-90 Rehabilitation Technique CPR Crack/Seat and AC Overlay DBR 0 mm AC Overlay Project Size.3 km 4. km 53. km 53. km Cost/Lane km $ 77,640 $3,90 $ 73,800 $8,300 /4/005 44 Diamond Study By ERES Extends service life Initial smoothness comparable to new pavement or overlay Average life of 3 years May be reground 3 to 4 times Summary Diamond grinding can extend pavement life significantly at a competitive cost. Diamond grinding is a key Preventive Maintenance tool. Diamond grinding will increase customer satisfaction, increase friction, reduce noise and reduce life cycle costs. Performance and cost vary with given conditions. Roughness will return if causes are not addressed. Consider dowel bar retrofit if significant faulting is present. Timing is everything. NE ACPA and IGGA are ready to assist! /4/005 45 /4/005 46 Web site s International Grooving and Association igga.net American Concrete Pavement Association pavement.com North East Chapter ACPA ne.pavement.com /4/005 47 /4/005 48 Session -8