Increased recovery of straight-run

Similar documents
Report. Refining Report. heat removal, lower crude preheat temperature,

Bitumen has become an

This is the first of two articles

Unit 7. Vaccum Distillation of Crude

D^r i^k_hkfzg\^ bg]b\zmhkl _hk <hgl^i mkzrl IZkZf^m^kl =^lb`g M^lm kng <hg\enlbhgl MZ[e^, DZnlabd Fhl\Z K^_^k^g\^l D^gm FZahg

heavy crude blends. Most heavy crudes have higher viscosities,

In 2000, the ConocoPhillips Sweeny, Texas, refinery began

A Theoretical Study in Maximizing Crude Unit Kerosene

As the global energy sector

Crude Distillation Chapter 4

CRUDE DISTILLATION. Overview. Purpose To recover light materials. Fractionate into sharp light fractions.

Fouling tendency is a critical

Distillation in Refining

Alon Big Springs refinery

Crude Oil Distillation. Chapter 4

Energy costs are the largest

On-Line Process Analyzers: Potential Uses and Applications

Improving reliability increases profitability. When

The Chevron Pembroke oil

Optimizing Distillate Yields and Product Qualities. Srini Srivatsan, Director - Coking Technology

Cooling water. Reflux drum. Product drum. Boiler. Decant oil. feed. water. Revamp improves FCC performance at BP s Texas City refinery

Heat Integration in a Crude Distillation Unit Using Pinch Analysis Concepts (AIChE 2008 Spring Meeting 165b)

Solvent Deasphalting Conversion Enabler

APC Implementation Case Study Vacuum Gasoil Cloud Point Model Predictive Controller 1

UOP Unicracking TM Process Innovations in Hydrocracking Technology

Recent increases in hydraulic

The Role of a New FCC Gasoline Three-Cut Splitter in Transformation of Crude Oil Hydrocarbons in CRC

SOLVENT DEASPHALTING OPTIONS How SDA can increase residue upgrading margins

Petróleo Brasileiro (Petrobras)

Selection of Column Internals - Coker Unit

Thermal cracking Introduction

Diesel Maximization: Putting a Straw on the FCC Feed AM Annual Meeting March 22-24, 2015 Marriott Rivercenter San Antonio, TX.

High Performance Tray Tower Solutions

Maximize Yields of High Quality Diesel

TechnipFMC RFCC Technology converts bunker fuels into high value products for African refiners

Richard Salliss & Rakesh Mehta New Approach to Refinery Crude Switch Optimization using Profit Suite and Unisim

Acombination. winning

Investment Planning of an Integrated Petrochemicals Complex & Refinery A Best Practice Approach

How. clean is your. fuel?

It won t foul up! High pressure spiral heat exchangers for the refinery industry

The FCCU main fractionator is a key

Abstract. Background. AM Page 1 of 22

Refineries add value to

Waste Lubricating Oil Purification and Recovery

The Role of the Merox Process in the Era of Ultra Low Sulfur Transportation Fuels. 5 th EMEA Catalyst Technology Conference 3 & 4 March 2004

Presentation. Strategy of Octane Management at IOCL Mathura Refinery

GTC TECHNOLOGY WHITE PAPER

Modernizing a Vintage Cat Cracker. Don Leigh HFC Rahul Pillai KBR Steve Tragesser KBR

Crude and vacuum distillation

Converting Visbreakers to Delayed Cokers - An Opportunity for European Refiners

Changing Refinery Configuration for Heavy and Synthetic Crude Processing

Atmospheric Crude Tower with Aspen HYSYS V8.0

MODERN REFINING CONCEPTS No Oil Refining without Hydroprocessing

Conversion Processes 1. THERMAL PROCESSES 2. CATALYTIC PROCESSES

Y. Zak Friedman, Ph.D Principal Consultant

Simulation studies of Naphtha Splitter unit using Aspen Plus for improved product quality

March 7, 1967 J. F. G. ELLIS 3,308,060

Crude Assay, ASTM, TBP distillations, Evaluation of crude oil properties.

Synthesis of Optimal Batch Distillation Sequences

Optimize Energy Recovery in Refineries. Copyright : Evae Andersson

CHAPTER 2 REFINERY FEED STREAMS: STREAMS FROM THE ATMOSPHERIC AND VACUUM TOWERS

Optimal Model-Based Production Planning for Refinery Operation

Optimal Model-Based Production Planning for Refinery Operation

1. Introduction. 2. Challenges. APC Implementation Case Study Implementing Advanced Process Control on Hydrocracker Unit 1

BTX Extractive Distillation Capacity Increased by Enhanced Packing Distributors

Meeting product specifications

Refining/Petrochemical Integration-A New Paradigm

Optimal Model-Based Production Planning for Refinery Operation

Maximizing Refinery Margins by Petrochemical Integration

Enhance Naphtha Value and Gasoline Reformer Performance Using UOP s MaxEne TM Process

Consulting and Training Services Available to the Petroleum Industry

Acomprehensive analysis was necessary to

Refining/Petrochemical Integration-A New Paradigm Joseph C. Gentry, Director - Global Licensing Engineered to Innovate

PILOT PLANT DESIGN, INSTALLATION & OPERATION Training Duration 5 days

TYPES OF BLENDING PROCESS

Using Pyrolysis Tar to meet Fuel Specifications in Coal-to-Liquids Plants

Maximize Vacuum Residue Conversion and Processing Flexibility with the UOP Uniflex Process

Changes in Bunker Fuel Quality Impact on European and Russian Refiners

SULFIDING SOLUTIONS. Why Sulfide?

REFINERY PROCESS AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS

Petroleum Refining-Production Planning, Scheduling and Yield Optimization

clean Efforts to minimise air pollution have already led to significant reduction of sulfur in motor fuels in the US, Canada, Keeping it

White Paper.

ConocoPhillips replaced a vacuum tower as part of a revamp to increase refi nery profi tability (Fig. 1).

Challenges and Opportunities in Managing CO 2 in Petroleum Refining

UOP UNITY Hydrotreating Products

New Technologies To Enhance the Distillation Yield of Petroleum Fractionation

FCC pretreatment catalysts

Kolmetz Handbook of Process Equipment Design REFINERY ATMOSPHERIC CRUDE TOWER SELECTION AND SIZING (ENGINEERING DESIGN GUIDELINE)

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

PCE154. Refinery Process and Products. H.H. Sheikh Sultan Tower (0) Floor Corniche Street Abu Dhabi U.A.E

Relative volume activity. Type II CoMoS Type I CoMoS. Trial-and-error era

UTILIZING CHEAP GAS TO MAXIMIZE REFINERY PROFITS IN NORTH AMERICA. Daniel B Gillis and Ujjal K Mukherjee, Chevron Lummus Global Gary M Sieli, CB&I

Maximizing Bottom-of-the Barrel Conversion with Commercially Proven Technologies. Jacinthe Frécon

Eni Slurry Technology:

Fluid Catalytic Cracking Course

Technology for Producing Clean Diesel Utilizing Moderate Pressure Hydrocracking With Hydroisomerization

GULFTRONIC SEPARATOR SYSTEMS

National Iranian Oil Engineering & Construction Co.

Haldor Topsøe Optimising diesel yield and product properties in hydrocracking. Bettina Sander-Thomsen, New Delhi, April 2012

Transcription:

Maximising diesel recovery from crude The CDU/DU process flow scheme is reviewed, including equipment design and operating fundamentals used to maximise straight-run diesel recovery. Factors important to increasing diesel yield are discussed in detail Scott W Golden Process Consulting Services Inc Increased recovery of straight-run (SR) diesel from crude improves refinery profitability. Low crude/ vacuum unit (CDU/DU) SR diesel recovery is caused by existing unit process flow schemes, equipment designs and operating conditions. Since many FCC or hydrocracker feeds contain 25 35% or more diesel bing-range material, there is significant opportunity to improve recovery. Low or moderate capital investments have increased refinery ULSD product yields by more than 5% on whole crude. CDU/DU diesel recovery Refiners in the US have until recently targeted maximum gasoline production with little focus on CDU/DU SR diesel recovery. Not surprisingly, few US refiners achieve good SR diesel recovery. This is because most of the existing process flow schemes and equipment were not designed to maximise the SR diesel yield from crude, nor were the operating variables associated with these flow schemes optimised for maximum SR diesel recovery. Most US refiners produce SR diesel only from their atmospheric crude s. Even some of the new CDU/DUs have not been designed for maximum recovery, because many major E&Cs (and some refiners) continue to believe that diesel should be produced only from the atmospheric. Even though diesel margins are very strong, there are still many misunderstandings about maximising CDU/DU diesel production. Many non-us refiners have designed their CDU/DU to maximise diesel recovery. Their atmospheric crude s have 10 14 trays between the flash zone and the diesel product draws. They do not produce an atmospheric gas () product as FCC or hydrocracker feed. Moreover, the CDU/DUs have been designed or revamped to produce diesel from the vacuum s top side-draw. Conversely, many US refiners have only two to five fractionating trays between the diesel and product acuum (FCC feed) acuum Figure 1 diesel product no diesel from vacuum draws, and operate with very little reflux below the diesel product draw. Furthermore, it is not unusual for a US refiner s vacuum feeds to contain 8 10% diesel, with only a few DUs producing a vacuum diesel product. It is also not unusual for a US refiner s top vacuum side-draw product to contain 70 90% 650 F (343 C) minus diesel bing-range material. In most cases, this diesel ends up in the FCCU. Refiners can quickly determine their CDU/DU performance by evaluating the amount of 650 F (343 C) minus diesel material in the CDU/DU streams feeding the FCC or hydrocracker. Even though hydrocrackers may recover some of this diesel bing-range material, it may not be the most cost-effective place to process it. A well-designed CDU/DU produces FCC or hydrocracker feed streams containing less than 5 vol% diesel bing-range material. Process flow scheme Most US refiners produce diesel product only from the atmospheric crude (Figure 1). Changes to the CDU process flow scheme and atmospheric equipment design and operating changes can improve recovery. However, diesel recovery is limited by process and distillation fundamentals in the atmospheric. It can be optimised, but it has fundamental limitations that constrain recovery. Only a few US and many non-us refiners produce both atmospheric and vacuum diesel products (Figure 2). Fractionation is inherently better in a vacuum, therefore diesel recovery is greatly improved. Fractionation is driven by internal efficiency and the fractionation section s liquid-to-vapour (L/) ratio. The top section of the vacuum has a much higher L/ ratio than the atmospheric, hence vacuum s fractionate better than atmospheric s no matter how good the CDU design. Better fractionation reduces the vacuum diesel product 95% to endpoint tail compared to atmospheric diesel. Additionally, the combined atmospheric and vacuum diesel products have better cold flow properties due to improved fractionation. The CDU/DU process flow scheme has the largest influence on SR diesel recovery. The CDU/DU must have a vacuum diesel product draw to maximise recovery. It is common for US refiners to produce an product (Figure 1). This stream is often combined with the vacuum gas (GO) products feeding an FCC or hydrocracker. Since atmospheric crude fractionation is inherently poor, product contains 30 70% or more diesel bing-range material. To maximise diesel recovery, no product should be produced or it should be fed into the upper section of the vacuum (Figure 3), where it can be fractionated into vacuum diesel and GO products. Overall CDU/DU diesel product recovery and energy consumption are improved when atmospheric is fed to the vacuum. The amount of diesel in the product will determine www.eptq.com PTQ Q1 2009 00

acuum (FCC feed) acuum acuum to vacuum acuum heavy crudes like Merey or BCF 17 must balance atmospheric and vacuum distillate yields against DU GO product yield objectives. s from heavy crudes are so difficult to vapourise even with the best DU design that atmospheric distillate yields must be constrained. Increasing the amount of diesel in the atmospheric increases the GO product yield. Conversely, as atmospheric gets heavier, GO product decreases and vacuum production increases. Since maximising the GO product yield increases the overall refinery liquid volume yield and reduces coke production, balancing atmospheric and vacuum diesel yields is crucial when processing heavy and extraheavy crudes. Figure 2 and vacuum diesel products Crude Internal Figure 4 internal reflux rate incremental recovery from processing in the vacuum. When revamping or designing a new CDU/DU to improve diesel recovery, selecting the most economic process flow scheme should also consider energy efficiency and GO product yield. Energy optimisation may set the proper amounts of diesel from the atmospheric crude and vacuum s. diesel product is withdrawn at 525 575 F (273 302 C), depending on Figure 3 and vacuum diesel products with feeding the vacuum product product operating pressure and diesel product distillation. This energy can be used to preheat crude, whereas the same diesel bing-range material produced from the vacuum is withdrawn at only 250 300 F (121 149 C), making it impossible to cost-effectively recover the heat. Balancing diesel production between the atmospheric and vacuum s saves energy, especially with light and moderately heavy crude s. Refiners processing heavy and extra- crude fundamentals Understanding atmospheric and vacuum distillation fundamental principles is crucial to optimising CDU/ DU economics. The atmospheric internal reflux rate below the diesel product draw and fractionation efficiency determines the diesel yield (Figure 4). The design requires the correct number of trays or amount of packing efficiency and it also needs optimum internal. Fractionation efficiency alone will not produce maximum diesel product. Fractionation section L/ ratio is one of the fundamental principles that determines product yield. The vapour rate into the fractionation section is set by the vapour leaving the flash zone and the heat balance. In an atmospheric, the vapour rate () is large because it consists of overhead product gas, naphtha, kerosene and diesel product, in addition to the internal reflux. Internal is relatively small because it consists only of overflash and product. Consequently, the fractionation section L/ ratio is typically less than 0.1 on a molar basis. diesel and product fractionation are inherently poor. All factors influencing the internal reflux rate (L) should be considered when revamping or designing a new CDU to maximise the atmospheric diesel yield. Fractionation efficiency depends on equipment design. Ideally, the diesel fractionation section should have at least eight properly designed trays or a packed bed with at least five theoretical stages of efficiency. Since atmospheric crude s are typically large diameter, the fractionating sections are designed with two- or four-pass trays to maintain a reasonable flow path length. Tray chord lengths are long, while the tray liquid rate is low. Therefore, it is not unusual to have poor tray efficiency in 00 PTQ Q1 2009 www.eptq.com

the diesel/ fractionation section due to very low weir loadings. Since the internal decreases from the tray directly below the diesel product draw to the bottom fractionating tray, it is critical to reduce the weir length (picket fencing) based on the minimum liquid rate. Maintaining weir loading of approximately 2 gpm/in of the weir on the bottom fractionation tray maintains tray efficiency at its intrinsic limit of approximately 60%. If weir loading drops below 1 gpm/in of the weir tray, efficiency drops quickly. When using packing, good distribution of the internal and adequate vapour distribution at the bottom of the fractionation section are key to maintaining efficiency. Proper equipment design can materially improve diesel yield or quality for a given internal. The atmospheric diesel product yield depends on the internal reflux rate once a is built. The internal reflux rate (L) is controlled by several variables, including the heater outlet temperature, operating pressure, pumparound heat removal location, stripping section efficiency and stripping steam rate. Raising the heater outlet temperature or reducing the operating pressure increases the amount of vapour generated in the flash zone. This allows a higher internal reflux when the heat balance is properly controlled. Improved stripping section performance either through higher efficiency or a higher stripping steam rate also increases the amount of flash zone vapour, permitting higher internal reflux in the diesel fractionating section. For a given flash zone vapour rate, the diesel fractionating section s internal reflux is determined by heat balance. Controlling heat balance is essential to maintain an optimum internal reflux rate. Figure 5 shows a with an pumparound located below the diesel fractionation section. s are used because the pumparound draw temperature is 50 100 F (28 56 C) higher than the diesel. Higher temperature pumparound heat is easier to recover against crude. Heat recovery and fractionation compete against each other. Increasing the duty may increase crude preheat, but it also reduces the reflux rate below the diesel product draw, which lowers the diesel product yield and increases the product yield. As the product yield increases, so does the amount of diesel bingrange material in the. As crudes get heavier and the flash zone vapour rate decreases, the duty must be reduced to maintain adequate diesel fractionation section reflux. When processing extra-heavy crude s, the Crude Figure 5 Optimising atmospheric heat balance CDU should be designed without an because the amount of flash zone vapour is so low it is impossible to remove any heat below the diesel product draw and have a reasonable fractionation section internal reflux rate. Optimising the heat balance is critical to optimising the internal reflux and diesel product yield. Stripping section performance is often overlooked when considering diesel product yield improvements (Figure 6). The stripping section vapourises the front end of the flash zone liquid as it flows down through the trays. Improved tray design and an increased number of trays raise efficiency, increasing the amount of flash zone vapour and reducing the amount of diesel in the atmospheric. The optimum number of stripping trays is eight to ten. A customised rectangular tray designed at very high weir loadings maximises efficiency and helps prevent fouling throughout the run length. Maximum stripping section efficiency allows the diesel fractionation section reflux to be increased. The optimum stripping steam rate is 5 8 lb/barrel of atmospheric, depending on stripping section efficiency. Higher CDU/DU diesel recovery requires yielding more atmospheric diesel or modifying the DU to produce vacuum diesel. Raising the atmospheric diesel yield product product demands better stripping, higher flash zone temperature, lower operating pressure, higher diesel/ fractionation section reflux or more fractionation efficiency. In some instances, modifying the atmospheric may materially increase diesel recovery at a reasonable cost. Yet, in other cases, modifying the atmospheric is very high cost, with relatively small yield improvements. acuum crude fundamentals Maximising CDU/DU diesel recovery requires a diesel product draw on the vacuum. Yet only a few US refiners produce a vacuum diesel product. Most still produce FCC feed from the top side-draw product, and it is not unusual for it to contain 60 80% diesel bing-range material. Many non-us refiners already produce diesel product from the top side-draw of the vacuum. Revamping an existing or designing a new DU to produce vacuum diesel requires a fractionation section (Figure 7). Fractionation is inherently better in the vacuum because the L/ ratio is much higher than the atmospheric. The top pumparound condenses the vacuum diesel product and reflux (L) for the fractionation section. Since the reflux flow rate is low, it must be metered and flow controlled to ensure it is maintained within the distributor www.eptq.com PTQ Q1 2009 00

Crude steam Maximize efficiency Figure 6 stripping section Optimum efficiency { Optimum Ejectors product product Therefore, atmospheric diesel fractionation section molar L/ ratio is typically 0.1 or less, whereas the vacuum fractionation section L/ ratio is 0.3 0.5. Since the vacuum L/ ratio is much higher than the atmospheric, it has better fractionation. The vacuum pumparound heat balance determines the amount of vacuum diesel that can be produced. The top pumparound duty must be sufficient to condense the available vacuum diesel product and the internal reflux. It is not unusual for too much heat to be removed in the lower pumparounds, resulting in low vacuum diesel product recovery even with a properly designed fractionation section. When packing efficiency is adequate (~ three theoretical stages) but the internal reflux is low, the vacuum diesel product yield will be low. Fractionation efficiency alone will not provide high vacuum diesel product recovery. Optimising the internal allows the maximum amount of vacuum diesel product yield. Maximising CDU/DU diesel product requires either no product from the atmospheric, or the can be fed to the vacuum to recover the diesel bing-range material. When atmospheric contains a large amount of diesel, it must be fed to the vacuum to maximise overall recovery. Since the atmospheric operates above atmospheric pressure and vacuum below, the majority of the product vapourises when it enters the vacuum. It should be fed to the vacuum below the fractionating bed for maximum vacuum diesel product and energy recovery (Figure 8). Selecting the proper location is critical. In a vacuum with both an MGO and HGO pumparound, it should be fed below the MGO pumparound for maximum heat recovery. Figure 7 acuum diesel products limitations. Good control of the heat balance is needed to generate sufficient fractionation section reflux. The vacuum diesel/lgo fractionation section L/ ratio is high compared to the atmospheric. The fractionation section reflux rate is typically 40 100% of the vacuum diesel product rate. Since the vapour rate leaving the top pumparound is extremely low, the vapour rate to the fractionation section is primarily vacuum diesel product and LGO product. While in the atmospheric crude, the vapour rate leaving the diesel pumparound contains overhead receiver gas, naphtha and kerosene, as well as the kerosene fractionation section reflux. Conclusion diesel recovery is inherently difficult because the fractionation section molar L/ ratio is typically less than 0.1, whereas in the vacuum it is 0.3 0.5. It is simply impossible to achieve high recovery without a diesel product draw on the vacuum. Fractionation basics favour this solution. Thus, it is not surprising that the CDU/DUs are designed differently where diesel product is the primary motor fuel and economics favour high recovery. Today that should also include US refiners. and vacuum diesel product yield should be optimised based on DU performance and energy recovery. High atmospheric diesel recovery makes the DU feed 00 PTQ Q1 2009 www.eptq.com

heavier, reducing the GO yield, especially with heavy and extra-heavy crudes. Heat recovery and crude preheat depend on atmospheric diesel and product yield. draw temperature is much higher in the atmospheric compared with the vacuum. Consequently, all the heat duty needed to condense vacuum diesel and its internal reflux is lost to air and water, whereas all the condensing heat and approximately half the product cooling heat are recoverable to crude from the atmospheric. Modifying the vacuum to produce diesel from the top section can be a relatively low- to moderate-cost revamp with a high return. Some vacuum s can have a fractionation section added within the existing vessel dimensions, while others require the top section of the to be replaced. Since the top section diameter is small, often no foundation changes are needed. In one case, the CDU/DU diesel yield was increased by 40% by installing a new top section on the vacuum with an investment of less than $5 MM. Furthermore, by increasing diesel recovery, some refiners have been able to unload their FCC and hydrocracker, allowing higher crude charge rates without exceeding these conversion unit capacities. from atmospheric Figure 8 Maximum diesel product yield Scott W Golden is a Chemical Engineer with Process Consulting Services in Houston, Texas. He has authored more than 100 technical papers on revamping Ejectors and troubleshooting refinery process units. Golden holds a BS in chemical engineering from the University of Maine and is a registered professional engineer in Texas. Email: sgolden@revamps.com www.eptq.com PTQ Q3 2008 65