Traffic Data For Mechanistic Pavement Design

Similar documents
APPENDIX C CATEGORIZATION OF TRAFFIC LOADS

CHARACTERIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF TRUCK LOAD SPECTRA FOR CURRENT AND FUTURE PAVEMENT DESIGN PRACTICES IN LOUISIANA

Development of Weight-in-Motion Data Analysis Software

Section 5. Traffic Monitoring Guide May 1, Truck Weight Monitoring

PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THE TOTAL LOAD EXPERIENCE OF A HIGHWAY AS CONTRIBUTED BY CARGO VEHICLES

UNDERSTANDING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF AXLE VERSUS LENGTH CLASSIFICATION ON AXLE FACTORS AND THE EFFECT ON AADT TO ENSURE RELIABLE TRAFFIC DATA

Journey into quality for traffic monitoring equipment. Short session monitoring operations

WIM #41 CSAH 14, MP 14.9 CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA APRIL 2014 MONTHLY REPORT

Presentation Outline. TRB MEPDG Workshop. Traffic Data & WIM Program. WIM Program in WIM program (prior to MEPDG) Utilizing WIM data

Engineering Dept. Highways & Transportation Engineering

Establishment of Statewide Axle Load Spectra Data using Cluster Analysis

Project Title: Using Truck GPS Data for Freight Performance Analysis in the Twin Cities Metro Area Prepared by: Chen-Fu Liao (PI) Task Due: 9/30/2013

Impact of Overweight Traffic on Pavement Life Using WIM Data and Mechanistic- Empirical Pavement Analysis

Freight Performance Measures Using Truck GPS Data and the Application of National Performance Measure Research Data Set (NPMRDS)

20. Security Classif. (of this page) Unclassified Form DOT F (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized

TRB Workshop Implementation of the 2002 Mechanistic Pavement Design Guide in Arizona

2. LITERATURE REVIEW. Keywords: Design hourly factor ( K-factor), annual average daily traffic(aadt), design hour volume(dhv), road design

Site DNL Calculator. Guidelines:

1 TO 2 2 TO 3 12 TO 1 10 TO TO 12

Reduction of vehicle noise at lower speeds due to a porous open-graded asphalt pavement

LARGE TRUCK MONITORING PROGRAM

1 TO 2 2 TO 3 3 TO 4 11 TO TO 1

WIM #41 CSAH 14, MP 14.9 CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA MAY 2013 MONTHLY REPORT

Heavy Commercial Volumes at Selected Piezo and Wim Sites( )

2002 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates. Special Locality Report 129

Structural Considerations in Moving Mega Loads on Idaho Highways

August ATR Monthly Report

1 TO 2 2 TO 12 TO 1 10 TO TO 12

ACCIDENT MODIFICATION FACTORS FOR MEDIAN WIDTH

Automated and Connected Vehicles: Planning for Uncertainty

Traffic Data Quality Verification and Sensor Calibration for Weigh-In-Motion (WIM) Systems

WIM #29 was operational for the entire month of October Volume was computed using all monthly data.

March 2, 2017 Integrating Transportation Planning, Project Development, and Project Programming

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Southern Windsor County 2016 Traffic Count Program Summary April 2017

May ATR Monthly Report

Project Manager: Neil Beckett. Prepared by: Bernadette Bañez. Reviewed by: Neil Beckett. Approved for issue by: David Darwin

WIM #48 is located on CSAH 5 near Storden in Cottonwood county.

Pavement Thickness Design Parameter Impacts

Truck Axle Weight Distributions

Toll Impact Study Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement

FHWA/IN/JTRP-2000/23. Final Report. Sedat Gulen John Nagle John Weaver Victor Gallivan

WIM #40 is located on US 52 near South St. Paul in Dakota county.

TMH 8. Traffic and Axle Load Monitoring Procedures

CRASH RISK RELATIONSHIPS FOR IMPROVED SAFETY MANAGEMENT OF ROADS

WIM #37 was operational for the entire month of September Volume was computed using all monthly data.

Heavy Trucks on the Highways: An Important Pavement Issue

Traffic Reports User Documentation

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study

There are three different procedures for considering traffic effects in pavement design. These are:

Conventional Approach

Prepared by: Bernadette Bañez. Reviewed by: Neil Beckett/Philp Blagdon. Approved for issue by: David Darwin

Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Austin TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pittsburgh PA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New Orleans LA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Portland OR-WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Oklahoma City OK. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Buffalo NY. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Fresno CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Hartford CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boise ID. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

TRAFFIC VOLUME TRENDS

Performance Measure Summary - Tucson AZ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Wichita KS. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Spokane WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

WIM #31 US 2, MP 8.0 EAST GRAND FORKS, MN JANUARY 2015 MONTHLY REPORT

Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Washington DC-VA-MD. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Toledo OH-MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Sight Distance. A fundamental principle of good design is that

Performance Measure Summary - Pensacola FL-AL. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Non-Destructive Pavement Testing at IDOT. LaDonna R. Rowden, P.E. Pavement Technology Engineer

Performance Measure Summary - Omaha NE-IA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Speed Limit Study: Traffic Engineering Report

A SPS Comparison Graphs

CATEGORY 500 PAVING SECTION 535 PAVEMENT SURFACE PROFILE

Performance Measure Summary - Allentown PA-NJ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Nashville-Davidson TN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Corpus Christi TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

WIM #40 US 52, MP S. ST. PAUL, MN APRIL 2010 MONTHLY REPORT

Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government 3. Recipient s Catalog No.

Performance Measure Summary - Boston MA-NH-RI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - El Paso TX-NM. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Minneapolis-St. Paul MN-WI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Transportation Statistical Data Development Report BAY COUNTY 2035 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Darwin-ME Status and Implementation Efforts_IAC09

Performance Measure Summary - Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

CHAPTER 7: EMISSION FACTORS/MOVES MODEL

Performance Measure Summary - New York-Newark NY-NJ-CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

New Zealand Transport Outlook. VKT/Vehicle Numbers Model. November 2017

The INDOT Friction Testing Program: Calibration, Testing, Data Management, and Application

Final Report FHWA/IN/JTRP-2002/10 UPDATING PROCEDURES TO ESTIMATE AND FORECAST VEHICLE-MILES TRAVELED

WIM #39 MN 43, MP 45.2 WINONA, MN APRIL 2010 MONTHLY REPORT

UNIT-1 PART:A. 3. (i) What are the requirements of an ideal highway alignment? Discuss briefly.

Expansion Projects Description

Transcription:

NCHRP 1-391 Traffic Data For Mechanistic Pavement Design

NCHRP 1-391 Required traffic loads are defined by the NCHRP 1-37A project software NCHRP 1-39 supplies a more robust mechanism to enter that data 1-39 software converts traffic monitoring data into pavement design inputs

NCHRP 1-391 Data Required Axle Load Spectra are the primary NCHRP 1-37A traffic load input Axle Load Spectra are basically W-4 tables Axle Load Spectra are for the Design Lane Requires lane specific volumes / weights

Axle Load Spectra Are computed using: Truck weight data (to shape the W-4 table) Truck volume data (to size the table) But load estimates are needed by Environmental condition Day / night condition

Extra Information Needed Monthly truck volumes (or seasonal adjustment factors) Allow computation of unbiased annual average Size the load spectra by month (season / environmental condition) Hourly truck volume distribution Provides day versus night load distribution

Extra Information Needed Forecasts of truck volume growth Shape of curve (linear? exponential?) Size of growth Are you currently monitoring truck volume growth?

Data Program - Introduction Site specific data are better than average data for a state or group of roads Averages are used when necessary

Data Program Short count data are used to provide: Site specific vehicle volumes Lane distribution information Time of day distributions

Data Program Continuous count data are used to create: Seasonal adjustment factors for truck volumes Day-of-week adjustment factors Tracking trends

NCHRP 1-391 Design 1-39 software is intended to allow state highway agencies to maximize the use of the data they already have encourage the collection of better data by showing better pavement design reliability when the data used are more reliable

NCHRP 1-391 Software Takes the diverse input data Is designed to work with files produced by existing state traffic software Will read existing data formats: C-cards W-cards Plan is for version 2.0 to read other formats (directly read VTRIS DBF files)

NCHRP 1-391 Software Creates required NCHRP 1-37A data sets, for example the number of axles per truck (by type of axle) for each class of trucks seasonal factors (from continuous classifier data) TWRG load distributions (from load spectra)

NCHRP 1-391 Design Different Levels of design. Levels relate to reliability of the load estimate A different Level can be used for vehicle class data than is used for weight data Reliability is reflected in statistical confidence associated with each load estimate

NCHRP 1-391 Software Will compute required NCHRP 1-39 error statistics for traffic data

NCHRP 1-391 Design Levels Understanding of Traffic Class Weight Level 1 Good Continuous at Site Site Specific Level 2 Modest Site Specific, but short Regional (TWRG) Average Level 3 Poor No Actual Class Data Statewide Average

Data Collection Levels Each Level can be further sub-divided For example, Level 2 Class can be 7-day counts, 3 or 4 times per year 48-hour counts, 3 or 4 times per year One, 7-day count One, 48-hour count Short duration 6-hour) manual count Each subdivision has its own reliability

Data Collection Levels Class 3A: Volume only, but where a classification count has been made somewhere on that road 3B: Where no measured classification data exists to make an estimate

1: Site specific 1A: Continuous Weight Levels 1M7: Seasonal samples taken 1S7: One week long count 1SD: One short duration count 2: Truck Weight Road Group (TWRG) 3: Statewide average

Truck Weight Data Level 2: Truck Weight Road Group (TWRG) Groups of roads that have similar load characteristics. (Shape of W-4 curves, not number of actual loads)

Tandem Axle Load Distribution 0.16 0.14 Fraction of Tandem Axles In Weight Group 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 Maximum Weight in a Given Axle Weight Group (x 1,000 lbs)

Tandem Axle Load Distribution 0.16 0.14 Fraction of Tandem Axles In Weight Group 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 Maximum Weight in a Given Axle Weight Group (x 1,000 lbs)

Tandem Axle Load Distribution 0.12 0.1 Fraction of Tandem Axles In Weight Group 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 Maximum Weight in a Given Axle Weight Group (x 1,000 lbs)

Tandem Axle Loading Patterns For Different Truck Weight Groups 0.16 0.14 Fraction of Axles in Each Weight Group 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 Heavily Loaded Moderately Loaded Lightly Loaded 0.02 0 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 Maximum Weight in a Given Weight Group (x 1,000 lbs)

Example TWRGs Rural Interstate and arterial major through-truck routes Other roads eastern part of state Other roads western part of state Urban Interstate and other through routes Roads serving heavy industry, ports, and intermodal terminals Other roads

NCHRP 1-391 Software Allows use of 13 FHWA vehicle categories, or Up to 20 state defined vehicle categories, or 3 or 4 length categories State must provide correlation between classifier data and WIM data

Outputs of 1-391 Software Load spectra (by VC and axle-group type) Error statistic for load spectra AADT(VC) Coefficients of variation (CVs) for the AADT(VC) Monthly distribution of AADT Directional distribution factor Time-of-day (hourly) distribution of AADT (by VC) Average number of axle groups (by type) for each VC Growth rates for the AADT(VC)

What Does 2001 TMG + AASHTO 2002 Guide Mean To Data Collection Programs?

What s s it mean? Truck volume counts mean more, so do more Understand seasonal, day-of-week movements of trucks

What s s It Mean? Plan ahead, where pavement design will occur count early, efficiently Learn more about truck weight patterns: Where are trucks heavy? Where are trucks light?

What s s it Mean? Analyze the data you already have Learn how truck patterns (volumes / weights) change across your state Use that knowledge in the pavement design process