CFD Combustion Models for IC Engines. Rolf D. Reitz

Similar documents
Improving Fuel Efficiency with Fuel-Reactivity-Controlled Combustion

System Simulation for Aftertreatment. LES for Engines

1 ERC Symposium - Future Engines and Their Fuels

* Corresponding author

Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

Maximizing Engine Efficiency by Controlling Fuel Reactivity Using Conventional and Alternative Fuels. Sage Kokjohn

Evolution of Particle Size Distribution within the Engine Exhaust and Aftertreatment System

Numerical Study of Multi-Component Spray Combustion with a Discrete Multi- Component Fuel Model

Modelling Combustion in DI-SI using the G-equation Method and Detailed Chemistry: Emissions and knock. M.Zellat, D.Abouri, Y.Liang, C.

Emissions predictions for Diesel engines based on chemistry tabulation

Numerical Study of Flame Lift-off and Soot Formation in Diesel Fuel Jets

Incorporation of Flamelet Generated Manifold Combustion Closure to OpenFOAM and Lib-ICE

Revisit of Diesel Reference Fuel (n-heptane) Mechanism Applied to Multidimensional Diesel Ignition and Combustion Simulations

DARS FUEL MODEL DEVELOPMENT

Overview & Perspectives for Internal Combustion Engine using STAR-CD. Marc ZELLAT

THE USE OF Φ-T MAPS FOR SOOT PREDICTION IN ENGINE MODELING

Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition combustion and fuel composition

A Second Law Perspective on Critical IC Research for High Efficiency Low Emissions Gasoline Engines

PDF-based simulations of in-cylinder combustion in a compression-ignition engine

Numerical Study on the Combustion and Emission Characteristics of Different Biodiesel Fuel Feedstocks and Blends Using OpenFOAM

Control of PCCI Combustion using Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Mixed Fuel

Randy Hessel and Dave Foster University of Wisconsin-Madison, Engine Research Center

A Computational Investigation of Two-Stage Combustion in a Light-Duty Engine

Satbir Singh and Rolf D. Reitz Engine Research Center, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Dual Fuel Engine Charge Motion & Combustion Study

Recent Advances in DI-Diesel Combustion Modeling in AVL FIRE A Validation Study

Modeling Constant Volume Chamber Combustion at Diesel Engine Condition

Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

Natural Gas fuel for Internal Combustion Engine

Combustion PVM-MF. The PVM-MF model has been enhanced particularly for dualfuel

Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

Introduction to combustion

COMPARISON OF VARIABLE VALVE ACTUATION, CYLINDER DEACTIVATION AND INJECTION STRATEGIES FOR LOW-LOAD RCCI OPERATION OF A LIGHT-DUTY ENGINE

Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

Dual-fuel RCCI combustion

A COMPREHENSIVE NUMERICAL STUDY OF THE ETHANOL BLENDED FUEL EFFECT ON THE PERFORMANCE AND POLLUTANT EMISSIONS IN SPARK-IGNITION ENGINE

International Multidimensional Engine Modeling User s Group Meeting April 7, 2014, Detroit, Michigan, USA

INVESTIGATION ON EFFECT OF EQUIVALENCE RATIO AND ENGINE SPEED ON HOMOGENEOUS CHARGE COMPRESSION IGNITION COMBUSTION USING CHEMISTRY BASED CFD CODE

IC Engines Roadmap. STAR-CD/es-ice v4.18 and Beyond. Richard Johns

air had to be heated to a high level to achieve HCCI operation due to the low level of internal residuals inherent in four-stroke engines.

Recent enhancement to SI-ICE combustion models: Application to stratified combustion under large EGR rate and lean burn

Marc ZELLAT, Driss ABOURI, Thierry CONTE and Riyad HECHAICHI CD-adapco

In-Cylinder Engine Calculations: New Features and Upcoming Capabilities Richard Johns & Gerald Schmidt

Effect of Reformer Gas on HCCI Combustion- Part II: Low Octane Fuels

EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION AND COMBUSTION MODELING OF A JP-8 SURROGATE IN A SINGLE CYLINDER DIESEL ENGINE

Update on Ammonia Engine Combustion Using Direct Fuel Injection

INFLUENCE OF INTAKE AIR TEMPERATURE AND EXHAUST GAS RECIRCULATION ON HCCI COMBUSTION PROCESS USING BIOETHANOL

Low Emissions IC Engine Development at Ford Motor Company

Fuel Effects in Advanced Combustion -Partially Premixed Combustion (PPC) with Gasoline-Type Fuels. William Cannella. Chevron

Optical methods for combustion research

Lib-ICE A C++ object-oriented library for internal combustion engine simulations: spray and combustion modeling

Progress in Predicting Soot Particle Numbers in CFD Simulations of GDI and Diesel Engines

A PRAGMATIC APPROACH TO REDUCING THE CO2 FOOTPRINT OF THE INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE

In-cylinder flows and combustion modeling: application and validation to real and enginelike configurations

Simulating PM emissions and combustion stability in gasoline/diesel fuelled engines

The Effect of Volume Ratio of Ethanol Directly Injected in a Gasoline Port Injection Spark Ignition Engine

NEW DIESEL EMISSIONS CONTROL STRATEGY for US TIER 2

Crankcase scavenging.

INFLUENCE OF FUEL TYPE AND INTAKE AIR PROPERTIES ON COMBUSTION CHARACTERISTICS OF HCCI ENGINE

Advanced Combustion Strategies for High Efficiency Engines of the 21 st Century

COMBUSTION AND EXHAUST EMISSION IN COMPRESSION IGNITION ENGINES WITH DUAL- FUEL SYSTEM

Numerical Study of Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI) Combustion in a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Using

Validation and Verification of ANSYS Internal Combustion Engine Software. Martin Kuntz, ANSYS, Inc.

8 th International Symposium TCDE Choongsik Bae and Sangwook Han. 9 May 2011 KAIST Engine Laboratory

SI engine combustion

MORPHOLOGY AND VOLATILITY OF PARTICULATE MATTER EMITTED FROM TWO DIRECT-INJECTION ENGINES

Article Combustion and Emission Characteristics of an LNG Engine for Heat Pumps

Fuel Anti-Knock Quality and Knock in SI Engines Gautam Kalghatgi

SYNERGISTIC EFFECTS OF ALCOHOL- BASED RENEWABLE FUELS: FUEL PROPERTIES AND EMISSIONS

Effect of mesh structure in the KIVA-4 code with a less mesh dependent spray model for DI diesel engine simulations

Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata Modeling Combustion of Methane- Hydrogen Blends in Internal Combustion Engines (BONG-HY)

PPC FOR LOW LOAD CONDITIONS IN MARINE ENGINE USING COMPUTATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES

Assessment of Innovative Bowl Geometries over Different Swirl Ratios/EGR rates

AN EXPERIMENT STUDY OF HOMOGENEOUS CHARGE COMPRESSION IGNITION COMBUSTION AND EMISSION IN A GASOLINE ENGINE

Variations of Exhaust Gas Temperature and Combustion Stability due to Changes in Spark and Exhaust Valve Timings

PARTICULATE MATTER EMISSION FROM A HEAVY DUTY DIESEL ENGINE WITH THREE BINARY BLENDS

Gas exchange and fuel-air mixing simulations in a turbocharged gasoline engine with high compression ratio and VVA system

Thermo-Kinetic Model to Predict Start of Combustion in Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition Engine

EFFECT OF INJECTION ORIENTATION ON EXHAUST EMISSIONS IN A DI DIESEL ENGINE: THROUGH CFD SIMULATION

THERMO-KINETIC COMBUSTION MODELING OF AN HCCI ENGINE TO ANALYZE IGNITION TIMING FOR CONTROL APPLICATIONS

International Multidimensional Engine Modeling, 2018

INCORPORATION OF EXHAUST GAS RECIRCULATION AND SPLIT INJECTION FOR REDUCTION OF NO x AND SOOT EMISSIONS IN DIRECT INJECTION DIESEL ENGINES

COMBUSTION in SI ENGINES

Gasoline Compression Ignition GCI Opportunities and Challenges Gautam Kalghatgi

Implications for Fuels for Internal Combustion Engines Gautam Kalghatgi

Advanced Ethanol-Diesel Dual-Fuel Combustion for Heavy-Duty Engines

Simulation of single diesel droplet evaporation and combustion process with a unified diesel surrogate

Optimization of Synthetic Oxygenated Fuels for Diesel Engines

Marc ZELLAT, Driss ABOURI and Stefano DURANTI CD-adapco

Biomass Fuel Applications in IC Engines

Particle Size Distribution Measurements from Early to Late Injection Timing Low Temperature Combustion

COMBUSTION in SI ENGINES

Fundamental Kinetics Database Utilizing Shock Tube Measurements

Influence of ANSYS FLUENT on Gas Engine Modeling

Li Cao, Haiyun Su, Sebastian Mosbach, Markus Kraft University of Cambridge. Amit Bhave Reaction Engineering Solutions Ltd.

THE 3-D SIMULATION WITH DETAILED CHEMICAL KINETICS OF THE TURBULENT COMBUSTION IN A PRE-CHAMBER INDIRECT INJECTION DIESEL ENGINE

Potential of the Mild HCCI Combustion for Worldwide Applications

Performance of a Compression-Ignition Engine Using Direct-Injection of Liquid Ammonia/DME Mixture

3D CFD Modeling of Gas Exchange Processes in a Small HCCI Free Piston Engine

Application of Detailed Soot-Particle Model to Simulations of Fundamental Spray Experiments and GDI Engine

Transcription:

CFD Combustion Models for IC Engines Rolf D. Reitz Engine Research Center University of Wisconsin-Madison ERC Symposium, June 7, 27 http://www.cae.wisc.edu/~reitz

Combustion and Emission Models at the ERC Turbulence vs. chemistry time scales 1. Characteristic Time Combustion Model (KIVA-CTC) Auto-ignition model (SHELL) ignition with 8 reaction steps Combustion model (CTC) turbulence mixing timescales 2. Representative Interactive Flamelet Model (KIVA-RIF) Flamelet equations/detailed chemistry coupled with CFD (Peters et al.) Effect of turbulence is modeled with average scalar dissipation rate 3. Direct Integration of CFD with Chemistry (KIVA-CHEMKIN) Each computational cell treated as well stirred reactor ERC reduced mechanism for n-heptane chemistry timescales 4. KIVA-CHEMKIN-G Model Explicit modeling of turbulent flame propagation combined with detailed chemistry Eddy breakup timescales Chemistry timescales

Auto-ignition and Detailed Chemistry Models Skeletal Chemistry Mechanism for Multi-Surrogate Fuels Gasoline Iso-octane 857 species 3586 reactions 25 species 51 reactions Diesel Bio-diesel N-heptane Methyl butanoate 57 species 258 reactions 264 species 1219 reactions 3 species 65 reactions 41 species 15 reactions 47 41 Multi-fuel Mechanism (ERC-PRF-Bio) Aromatic Alcohol Toluene Ehthanol surrogate fuel Multi-component fuel Comprehensive mechanism Skeletal mechanism Dr. Youngchul Ra Jessica Brakora SAE 24-1-558, SAE 27-1-19, SAE 27-1-165

Validation - Auto-ignition Model n-heptane-iso-octane/air mixtures, stoichiometric, P=4 Bar) Calculation using ERC-PRF mechanism Ignition Delay Time (ms) 1 1 1.1 1% i-octane 9% i-octane / 1% n-heptane 8% i-octane / 2% n-heptane 6% i-octane / 4% n-heptane 1% n-heptane Shock tube measurements (Fieweger et al. 1997) SAE 27-1-165.1.7.8.9 1. 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1(K)/T

Validation Cat HD engine 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 rpm = 1737 eq_ratio =.23 c_ratio = 16.1 inj_timing = -113 ca -4-2 2 4 7 rpm CAD ATDC Experiment eq_ratio =.27 Shell-CTC c_ratio = 16.1 CHEMKIN inj_timing = - 274.5 ca -4-2 2 4 CAD ATDC 6 5 4 3 2 1 CO (g/kgf) 18 16 Experiment 9 14 Shell-CTC Gasoline HCCI CHEMKIN 8 12 7 1 AHRR (J/deg) 9 8 7 6 AHRR (J/deg) 5 4 3 2 1 8 6 4 2 3.5 3. 2.5 NOx (g/kgf) 2. 1.5 1..5. Experiment Shell-CTC Chemkin.135 Experiment.2.23.27.29.39 Shell-CTC Equivalence ratio Chemkin.135.2.23.27.29.39 Equivalence ratio SAE 22-1-418, SAE 27-1-19

Validation - GM Light-duty Diesel Engine KIVA-CHEMKIN SOIC = 39, -32 and 23 SOIC=-32 GM 1.9L 4-cylinder Bore Stroke 82 9.4 mm Compression Ratio 16.6: 1 Engine Speed 2 rev/min IMEP 5.5 Bar EGR 67% PCCI SAE 27-1-193

Advances in SI Engine Combustion Modeling G-equation Combustion Model with Detailed Chemical Kinetics SAE 2-1-289 Discrete particle ignition model Burnt Gas G-Equation Flame propagation End Gas ~ G t + ( v f v vertex ~ ) G = u S T Auto-ignition (detailed kinetics) ~ G D T ~ ~ k G SAE 23-1-722 SAE 27-1-165

2.5 2. 1.5 1. Validation Ford SI Engine EXPT SIMU PFI mode -32 O ATDC 2.5 KIVA-CHEMKIN-G 2. 1.5 1. EXPT SIMU PFI mode -44 O ATDC Ford DISI Bore Stroke 89 79.5 mm Compression Ratio 12 : 1 Engine Speed 15 rev/min PFI Spark sweep.5 3.5 25 EXPT Spk = -2 o ATDC. 3. SIMU -1-5 5 12 2.5 2. 1.5 1. Crank Angle ( o ATDC).5 5 4. 35. 3.5 EXPT MAP = 75 kpa -.5 SIMU 3 3. -8-6 -4-2 2 4 6 8 1 2.5 Crank Angle ( o 25 ATDC) 2. 2 1.5 1. 1.5. 5 -.5-8 -6-4 -2 2 4 6 8 1 Crank Angle ( o ATDC) 15 15 1.5 3.5 25 EXPT Spk = -32 o ATDC. 3. SIMU -1-5 5 1 2 2.5 Heat Release Rate (J/Deg Heat Release Pressure Rate (MPa) (J/Deg 2. 1.5 1. Crank Angle ( o ATDC).5 5. 4. 35 -.5 3.5 EXPT MAP = 1 kpa SIMU 3 3. -8-6 -4-2 2 4 6 8 1 Crank Angle ( o ATDC) 25 2.5 2. 2 1.5 1. 1.5. 5 -.5-8 -6-4 -2 2 4 6 8 1 Crank Angle ( o ATDC) 15 1 15 Heat Release Rate (J/De Heat Release Rate (J/Deg DI Spark sweep DI MAP sweep SAE 27-1-165

Validation - Sandia Cummins Diesel High-T, long-id Condition (Premixed Combustion) O 2 = 21% SOI = -5 AHRR (J/deg) 12 1 8 6 4 2 TEST CHEMKIN G_Model Injection Profile -1-15 -1-5 5 1 15 2 25 CAD ATDC High-T, Long-ID Experiment KIVA-CHEMKIN KIVA-CHEMKIN-G 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 SAE 26-1-55 Green: OH Red: Soot

Validation - Cummins Dual-Fuel Engine Experimental SAE 27-1-171 KIVA-CHEMKIN-G NOx Emissions (grams) Experimental Measurements 18 Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 15 Case 4 Case 5 12 AHRR (J/deg) 9 6 3.3.25.2.15.1.5. -2-2 -15-1 -5 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 Measured Predicted CAD ATDC NOx Case1 Case2 Case3 Case4 Case5 C 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 AHRR (J/deg) 18 15 12 9 6 3 Model Predictions BMEP 1 bar SOI -87 BTDC PIVC 2.1 bar NG.44 CR 14.5 Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5-2 -2-15 -1-5 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 CAD ATDC Case 1 2 3 4 5 TIVC (K) 392 397.5 43 45 48 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Primary Fuel: Natural Gas Ignition Source: Diesel Pilot (1%)

Validation - Cummins Dual-Fuel Engine KIVA-CHEMKIN vs KIVA-CHEMKIN-G AHRR(J/deg) 18 15 12 9 6 Test KIVA-CHEMKIN Case 1 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 AHRR(J/deg) 18 15 12 9 6 Test KIVA-CHEMKIN-G Case 1 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 3-2 -5-4 -3-2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 CAD ATDC 2 3-2 -5-4 -3-2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 CAD ATDC 2 Without flamepropagation combustion is too slow

Summary and Conclusions Current CFD models describe important physical and chemical processes of engine flows, but validation experiments are needed for model development and improvement CFD combustion models capture engine performance and emissions trends and can be combined with optimization tools for design and evaluation of engine design concepts Methodologies are in place for modeling a wide range of combustion regimes: HCCI PCCI Diesel SI flame propagation dual-fuel Multi-component fuel vaporization models can be coupled with advanced chemical kinetics models Surrogate fuel models are under development to represent representative practical fuels (MB, toluene, ethanol..)

Multi-Component fuel modeling Dr. Youngchul Ra Gasoline* * Adapted from J. Farrel, Exxon Mobil Corp. Diesel Aromatics % 16 Sulfur ppm 7.3 Paraffins % 42 Napthenes % 42 Olefins %.3 e l o m C/H ratio - 6.393 r o n o i t u b i r t s i d 1.6 5 gasoline composition 1.4 Discrete g p (mw i ) iso-octane approximation 4 1.2 Single comp approx 1 3.8.6 Continuous f p (I) 2.4 1.2 5 1 15 2 25 3 molecular weight d i s t r i b u t i o n o r m o l

PRF5: Emissions HC at EVO [g.kg-f] 14 12 1 8 6 4 PRF5 Diesel-sgl CO at EVO [g/kg-f] 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 PRF5 Diesel-sgl 2 HC -5-45 -4-35 -3-25 -2 1 CO -5-45 -4-35 -3-25 -2 start of injection command [deg ATDC] start of injection command [deg ATDC].25.2 PRF5 Diesel-sgl NOx [g/kg-f].15.1 LTC regime (EGR=65%) Injection sweep.5. NOx -5-45 -4-35 -3-25 -2 start of injection command [deg ATDC]

Reduced Biodiesel Mechanism Jessica Brakora LLNL methyl butanoate (MB) * Surrogate to represent the large methyl esters in biodiesel MB chemical formula: C 5 H 1 O 2 264 species, 1219 reactions Mechanism Reduction Method SENKIN constant volume analysis Identify key species and reaction paths based on ignition timing Peak concentration: remove species that never exceed specified mole fraction thresholds (-112 species) XSENKPLOT reaction flux analysis: identify key reaction pathways, remove less important paths (-111 species) Adjust rate constants for key reactions to optimize ignition timing *Proc. Comb. Inst., Vol 28, 2/pp.1579-1586 1.E+ 1.E-1 1.E-2 1.E-3 1.E-4 Large flux to mb2j (C 5 H 9 O 2 ); test removal of other paths Ignition Delay [s] LLNL detailed (264 species) rm spec < 1^-1 (199 spec) rm spec < 1^-9 (179 spec) rm spec < 1^-8 (162 spec) No noticeable change in ignition; these species can be removed 1.E-5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 Initial Temperature [K] XSENKPLOT reaction paths: MB fuel breakup

Reduced MB Kinetic Mechanism mb ch3o2h (ch3o, ch2o, ch3o2) mb2ooh mb2oo mb2j These species further break down into lower-level carbon species (ch3oco) mb2o mb2ooh4j mp2d MB reduced coupled with ERC n-heptane: 41 species, 15 reactions me2*o c2h5cho mb2ooh4oo ch2cho 1.E+2 P = 4bar, Phi = 1. LLNL detailed me2j*o (ch2co,ch3oco) (c2h5) mb4ooh2*o mp3j2*o ch2co (ch2o) Ignition Delay [ms] 1.E+1 1.E+ 1.E-1 MB reduced (ch3oco, ch2co) 1.E-2 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 Initial Temperature [K]

Auto-ignition and Detailed Chemistry Models Diesel Gasoline RH + O 2 ROOH First Stage Ignition OH ORO Olefin RH + O 2 HO 2 H 2 O 2 ERC n-heptane mechanism SAE 24-1-558: 34 species H 2 O 2 + (M) OH + OH + (M) Second Stage Ignition ERC PRF Reduced Chemistry SAE 27-1-19, SAE 27-1-165: 47 species

Multi-component Fuel DMC/PRF Models PRF5 fuel pressure [MPa] 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 n-heptane iso-octane 28 24 2 16 12 8 4 HRR [J/deg] P, inj= -45 P, inj= -42 P, inj= -39 P, inj= -33 P, inj= -27 P, inj= -21 P, ic8 P, nc7 HRR, inj= -45 HRR, inj= -42 HRR, inj= -39 HRR, inj= -33-3 -2-1 1 2 3 4 5 CA [deg ATDC] HRR, inj= -27 HRR, inj= -21 HRR, ic8 HRR, nc7