Worldwide Pollution Control Association. August 3-4, 2010

Similar documents
Full-Scale Evaluation Of Mercury Control Across A Wet Particulate Scrubber

NACAA Briefing on Mercury Provisions of

BENCHMARKING SO 3 REMOVAL THE CLEANSTACK PROCESS

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

Industrial Boiler MACT HCL/PM Control with Wet Scrubbing / Wet ESP Control Technology"

C C A. Combustion Components Associates, Inc.

U.S. Chamber of Commerce

Legislation in the European Union and the impact on existing plant

NOx Emission Control Options for ICI Boilers

MECHANISM OF NOx CONTROL

Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems America. Coal to Gas Conversions

Alternative Fuels Can Significantly Reduce Costs

Experimental Investigation of Catalyst Deactivation Below the MOT and Full Load Regeneration

Full-Scale Evaluation of Carbon Injection for Mercury Control at a Unit Firing High Sulfur Coal

Commercial Operating Experience on an Activated Carbon Injection System

NOx: Troubleshooting and Optimization of Combined Cycle SCR Systems

Particulate Control O&M Training. APC/PCUG Conference July 12-16, 2009 The Woodlands, TX

Oxidation Technologies for Stationary Rich and Lean Burn Engines

Oxidation Technologies for Stationary Rich and Lean Burn Engines

Emission Reduction Program (ERP) For Existing Pulverized Fuel Fired Thermal Power Plants

Successful Implementation of Cormetech Catalyst. in High Sulfur Coal-Fired SCR Demonstration Project

Diagnostic Tools for Gas Turbine CO and SCR Systems

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

INSTALLATION OF THE POWER INDUSTRY S FIRST COMMERCIAL ALTA SYSTEM FOR NO X CONTROL AT AMEREN S SIOUX PLANT

SCR and HAPs Converters for Stationary Engines

Solutions for catalytic filtration. Nadia Bjerring Jørgensen Sales Manager Catalytic APC Solutions

Workshop I. Tuning LNB s and OFA Systems

Internal Revenue Service

Combustion and Boiler Performance Assessment of Kardia Power Plant

High SO 2 Removal Performance using Limestone FGD at Tusimice Power Plant

TECHNICAL PUBLICATION

3. GENERAL CONDITIONS

Initial Operating Results from the First B&V Installations of CT-121TM Wet FGD Technology in North America Dave Harris Vice President, AQCS Technology

DIOXIDE REMOVAL FROM STACK GASES

OPERATIONAL CRITERIA AND BURNER MODIFICATIONS FOR ACHIEVING LOW LOAD UNSUPPORTED COAL FIRING ON TANGENTIAL AND WALL-FIRED UNITS

IMPROVING PROFITS THROUGH ALTERNATIVE FUELS

Emission controls for NOx compliance Challenges & Applications. Greener Shipping Summit November 2017

INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS OF GAS TURBINES Fall 2010 Course


Future Challenges in Automobile and Fuel Technologies For a Better Environment. Diesel WG Report. September 25, 2000

IED RELATING TO OIL AND GAS BURNERS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE

Steinmüller Engineering GmbH POWER-GEN Europe, Vienna

GLASSMAN EUROP CERCAT : A Technology for Air Pollution Control. Process, Construction & Performances

Emission Control Technology for Stationary Diesel Engines

MARINE EXHAUST GAS CLEANING SOLUTIONS

NO TROUBLE WITH NOx AN ADVANCED CONCEPT FOR EFFECTIVE NO X REDUCTION

Chariton Valley Biomass Project Iowa Switchgrass Cofiring Update

2007 Chevron and John Zink Company, LLC

2001 Conference on SCR and SNCR

A&WMA, CA SCAQMD, Diamond Bar, CA. Challenges for Meeting New Lower Air Emissions

ZERO PILOT UNITS PIONEERING TECHNOLOGIES ON A SMALL SCALE.

Boiler Optimization and MATS Work Practices Requirements. McIlvaine Hot Topics September 27 th, 2013

Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Boilers at Area Source Facilities (Boiler GACT) Final Reconsidered Rule Requirements Summary

Thermal Exploitation of Wastes in Lignite Combustion Facilities

Multi-Pollutant Catalyst for Combustion Turbine Power Plants

Rita Aiello/5 December 2016/Johnson Matthey, Stationary Emissions Control

Retrofitting of Mitsubishi Low NOx System

Steinmüller-Tagung April 2013

Coal Fired Boilers. Technologies for Improved Efficiency & Reduced Emissions. C.Jayadevan Bharat Heavy Electriclas Ltd. Tiruchirappalli, India

ICI Boiler NOx & SO 2

Catalytic Coatings for Diesel Particulate Filter Regeneration

New Catalytic Stripper System for the Measurement of Solid Particle Mass, Number, and Size Emissions from Internal Combustion Engines

Combustion Equipment. Combustion equipment for. Solid fuels Liquid fuels Gaseous fuels

Alkali sulphation in flames

Mercury Emissions during Fluidised Bed Combustion of different fuels

Technology Options for the Cement Industry with the Use of Alternative Fuels

Wärtsilä NO X Reducer. Environmental Efficiency

Regulatory Impacts of Biogas-fired Internal Combustion Engines

Presented by. Navistar Education 2015

Design Features and Commissioning of the 700 MW Coal-Fired Boiler at the Tsuruga Thermal Power Station No. 2

OPERATING EXPERIENCES FROM COMBUSTION OF WITH THE FOCUS ON CHALLENGING BIOMASS

2013 Aftertreatment System with SCR Overview for Technicians Study Guide

Power Generation Flexibilisation Case Studies from Germany. By Ronald Rost & Arun Kumar Sarna

Solvent Deasphalting Conversion Enabler

Alstom CFB boilers achieve high combustion efficiency with challenging discarded coal. Hugh Kennedy 16 th July 2013

Introducing the TM /

State of the Art (SOTA) Manual for Internal Combustion Engines

Internal Revenue Service

Retrofit von Industriekesseln zur Brennstoffänderung und NOx- Reduzierung. Dr.-Ing. Marco Derksen

COST EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION. A. Selective Catalytic Reduction System

ALLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT AIR QUALITY PROGRAM

Commencement of the Commercial Operation of 600 MW Unit, "Hirono No. 5 Thermal Power Station of The Tokyo Electric Power Co., Inc.

Reliant Energy Tangential Low NOx System at Limestone Unit 2 Cuts Texas Lignite, PRB and Pet Coke NOx

Emissions Characterization of Three High Efficiency Wood Boilers

D-GASIFIER. The ultimate solution for the replacement of gaseous and liquid fuels

Water Scrubbing Technology for reducing marine emissions

Environmental Retrofits: Costs and Supply Chain Constraints

Multi-Sector Air Pollutants Regulations (MSAPR) May 2017

Combustion Optimization of Panshan Unit 4 for Energy Savings & NO x Emissions Reduction

SCR under pressure - pre-turbocharger NOx abatement for marine 2-stroke diesel engines

The influence of Air Nozzles Shape on the NOx Emission in the Large-Scale 670 MWT CFB Boiler

Advanced gas turbine power cycles

Control of gaseous emissions and dust in a single-step solution

AIR EMISSION SOURCE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF INFLUENCE OF SOFA ON NOX EMISSIONS FOR PULVERIZED COAL BOILER

Challenges and Solutions for Shale Oil Upgrading

Internal Revenue Service

VALMET IBMACT & Utility MATS. Boiler Tune-ups

Module 2:Genesis and Mechanism of Formation of Engine Emissions Lecture 3: Introduction to Pollutant Formation POLLUTANT FORMATION

Table 1 Emission Rates for New DG Technologies

Transcription:

Worldwide Pollution Control Association IL Regional Technical Seminar August 3-4, 2010 Visit our website at www.wpca.infowpca

WPCA 90% Mercury Removal Control Technologies Amy Evans Marsulex Environmental Technologies Ken Jeffers Johnson Matthey Catalysts Don Stowe Babcock Power Greg Bielawski The Babcock & Wilcox Company WPCA Regional Seminar Springfield, Illinois August 3, 2010 Proprietary and Confidential.1

Man-made Sources of Mercury in the Environment 2006 10% % 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 7% 5% 5 1% 1% % Fossil Fuel Combustion (Primarily Coal) Cement Industry Non-Ferrous Metal 3%1% Production Pig Iron & Steel Production 7% Caustic Soda Production 5% Mercury Production 67% Gold Production 67% Waste Disposal Other Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..2

Federal Mercury MACT Standard 3/16/2011 To be proposed 11/16/2011 Final rule Copyright 2010 Babcock Power Inc. All rights reserved. www.babcockpower.com

Proprietary and Confidential 2008 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..4

1970 s & 1980 s Sulfur dioxide 500-3000 ppm SO 2 Early systems 70%-85% capture Very poor availability 1980 s &1990 s NOx 200-600 ppm Early systems low capture rates High ammonia slip 2000 s Mercury ~1 ppb Copyright 2010 Babcock Power Inc. All rights reserved. www.babcockpower.com

Coal Mercury Concentration lbs Hg/TBtu 2-4 4-6 6-9 9-15 15-30 30-52 1999 coal production, ICR 2 data, by county http://geology.utah.gov/emp/mercury/pdf/presentation0806.pdf Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..6

Chlorine in Coal Chlorine (ppm, dry) Proprietary and Confidential <100 100-250 250-500 500-1,000 1,000-2,000 2,000-4,450 Coal Seam Areas 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved. http://ugs.utah.gov/emp/mercury/index.htm.7

Flue Gas Speciation Mercury Speciation by Fuel Type Bituminous Subbituminous Lignite 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Elemental Hg Oxidized Hg 2000 Data per NETL at 2002 EPRI Workshop Influences on Hg Speciation Gas Composition (i.e., Chloride) Unburned Carbon (UBC) Catalysts (i.e., SCR, Ash, Boiler Metals) Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..8

Power Plant Co-benefits Reduce Stack Mercury Emissions Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..9

Mercury Control Options MercPlus (Hg+) System Dry FGD PJFF SO 3 Sorbent Injection PAC Injection TOXECON Boiler SCR TOXECON II Wet FGD ESP Pulverizer Air Heater Process Flow Injection Flows Absorption Plus (Hg) System Proprietary and Confidential 2009 The Babcock & Wilcox Company. All rights reserved..10

90% Mercury Removal SCR Effects Ken Jeffers Johnson Matthey Catalysts WPCA Regional Seminar Springfield, Illinois August 3, 2010 Proprietary and Confidential.11

Hg Oxidation across SCR Catalyst WPCA Illinois Technical APC Seminar Springfield, IL August 3, 2010 Ken Jeffers SCR Applications Engineer

Introduction Mercury Emission Control from Coal-fired Sources Hg speciation H 0 elemental mercury Hg 2+ oxidized mercury Total Hg T includes Hg 0, Hg 2+, Hg P Strong influence on speciation by Cl/Br in flue gas Basic Capture/Removal Methods Activated Carbon Injection, baghouse Hg 0 /Hg 2+ Novel Sorbents, baghouse Hg 0 /Hg 2+ Capture in wet-fgd Hg 2+ (water soluble, easier to absorb) Hg oxidation is a co-benefit of SCR catalyst ***SCR catalyst does not capture or remove Hg*** Challenging as Hg is in trace amounts ~ ppb, µg/nm 3 Hg 2+ can re-emit to Hg 0 downstream of SCR

Reactions of Hg in SCR Catalyst Desired Reactions Hg oxidation Hg + 2 HCl + ½ O 2 HgCl 2 + H 2 O Hg + SO 3 + ½ O 2 HgSO 4 Side Reactions 2 HCl + ½ O 2 Cl 2 + H 2 O Hg + Cl 2 HgCl 2 Undesired Side Reactions Cl 2 + SO 2 + H 2 O 2 HCl + SO 3, inhibition of Cl 2 formation 3 HgCl 2 + 2 NH 3 3 Hg + 6 HCl + N 2, reduction of Hg by NH 3 HgCl 2 + SO 2 + H 2 O Hg + 2 HCl + SO 3, reduction of Hg by SO 2

Key Variables for Hg Oxidation in SCR Catalyst Flue gas Chlorine concentration (HCl/Cl - ) Influences speciation at SCR inlet high Cl, increases Hg 2+ in Hg T 50+ ppm HCl in flue gas 80 90%+ Hg oxidation Similar effect for 5+ ppm Bromine Lower oxidation rates for low Cl fuels (PRB, low Cl bituminous) Flue gas Temperature < 700 F favorable for Hg oxidation Ammonia competes for active sites in catalyst and inhibits Hg oxidation NH 3 -NO x reaction favored in top catalyst layer(s) Hg oxidation favored in lower catalyst t layers as NH 3 is depleted d Filling spare catalyst layers good for Hg oxidation

Hg Oxidation in Catalyst General Effect of Cl 100% 90% 80% SCR Outlet Ox xidized Mercu ury 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Chlorine (ppmv) Reproduced by permission from Effects of Chlorine and other Flue Gas Parameters on SCR Catalyst Mercury Oxidation and Capture, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA 2009. 1020591

Hg Oxidation in Catalyst General Effect of NH 3 SCR Outle ized Hg at Oxid et100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 50% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% DeNOx Level (50 ppm Chlorine injection, design temperature and flow) Reproduced by permission from Effects of Chlorine and other Flue Gas Parameters on SCR Catalyst Mercury Oxidation and Capture, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA 2009. 1020591

Hg Oxidation in Catalyst Effects of Temperature and Cl part of oxidize ed Hg after SC CR (%) Hg ges =10 15µg/Nm3 low HCl content medium HCl content 320 350 380 410 Temperature ( C)

Thank You! Ken Jeffers SCR Applications Engineer ken.jeffers@jmusa.com 678 341 7523 Johnson Matthey Catalysts, LLC 1121 Alderman Drive, Suite 204 Alpharetta, GA 30005 www.jmcatalysts.com

90% Mercury Removal Activated Carbon Don Stowe Babcock Power WPCA Regional Seminar Springfield, Illinois August 3, 2010 Proprietary and Confidential.20

90% Mercury Capture; Can we get there? Don Stowe, Consultant Babcock Power Copyright 2010 Babcock Power Inc. All rights reserved. www.babcockpower.com

Fuel Boiler type Plant layout Background Hg Capture (high LOI ash) Existing APC devices (co-benefits) ` Copyright 2010 Babcock Power Inc. All rights reserved. www.babcockpower.com

Copyright 2010 Babcock Power Inc. All rights reserved. www.babcockpower.com

SCR Reasonable job of oxidizing Hg Also Oxidizes SO 2 to SO 3 Wet FGD Good job of capturing oxidized Hg Spray dryer/fabric filter CDS technology Copyright 2010 Babcock Power Inc. All rights reserved. www.babcockpower.com

Install baghouse/pac injection Most expensive $80-130/KW capital investment Additional parasitic load Not practical at many installations Space constraints t Fan capacity Copyright 2010 Babcock Power Inc. All rights reserved. www.babcockpower.com

PAC extremely effective for capturing oxidized Hg PAC does poorer job of capturing elemental Hg PRB flue gas predominantly elemental Hg SO 3 proven to poison PAC Copyright 2010 Babcock Power Inc. All rights reserved. www.babcockpower.com

Carbon has the adsorption capacity Fixed bed data Hg loading up to 10% 100,000 µg/g Typical real world adsorption 20-40 µg/g Challenge is kinetics (assure Hg contacts carbon) Copyright 2010 Babcock Power Inc. All rights reserved. www.babcockpower.com

12 Hg Adsorption Fixed Bed Commercial PAC 10 HgCl 2 mg Hg ret/g PAC 8 6 4 Hg (0) 2 Typical reaction time < 1 sec. 0 O 0 60 120 180 240 Time, minutes Source: UK CAER Copyright 2010 Babcock Power Inc. All rights reserved. www.babcockpower.com

Oxidation of Hg g( (bromine) Coal blending Furnace injection of oxidant PAC/Br blends Elimination of poisons (SO3) Trona/Hydrated Lime/Magnesium Oxide Pre-blended PAC/alkali Upstream alkali injection Selection of most cost effective carbon Pore size critical parameter Low ash Low moisture Copyright 2010 Babcock Power Inc. All rights reserved. www.babcockpower.com

Reduce carbon particle size Finer grind Material handling issues ESP blow-by by On site micronizing Expensive / high maintenance Increase residence time Install baghouse (Toxicon) Improve dispersion/mixing CFD Physical Modeling Install mixing i device Copyright 2010 Babcock Power Inc. All rights reserved. www.babcockpower.com

Design/engineer PAC dosing systems CFD Physical flow modeling Delta Wing static mixer Low cost lignite based carbon HOK Bromine impregnated Sulfur impregnated Alkali impregnated Copyright 2010 Babcock Power Inc. All rights reserved. www.babcockpower.com

Copyright 2010 Babcock Power Inc. All rights reserved. www.babcockpower.com

A5 Copyright 2010 Babcock Power Inc. All rights reserved. www.babcockpower.com

Slide 33 A5 scale 1:40 Author, 7/29/2010

A6 Copyright 2010 Babcock Power Inc. All rights reserved. www.babcockpower.com

Slide 34 A6 800 mw duct between Xand Y dimensions - gas flow- Author, 7/29/2010

Every unit is site specific Remove carbon poisons SO3 Oxidize Hg Put PAC in contact with oxidized Hg Physical modeling Evaluate low cost PAC Copyright 2010 Babcock Power Inc. All rights reserved. www.babcockpower.com

Ultimate answer by testing Lbs/hr required x $/lb Data suggest most brominated perform similarly as well as non- brominated Ineffective measuring sticks BET surface area Bromination method Copyright 2010 Babcock Power Inc. All rights reserved. www.babcockpower.com

Copyright 2010 Babcock Power Inc. All rights reserved. www.babcockpower.com

Thank You Copyright 2010 Babcock Power Inc. All rights reserved. www.babcockpower.com

90% Hg Removal with Wet or Dry FGD Systems by Greg Bielawski WPCA Regional Seminar Springfield, Illinois August 3, 2010

CaCl 2 Injection (if needed) B&W s Wet FGD Mercury Control Options PAC Injection (if needed) FGD Injection (if needed) Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..40

Industry Challenges Hg re-emission emission in WFGDs PAC poisoning when burning high sulfur coal Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..41

Absorption Plus (Hg) TM System for Enhanced Mercury Capture Proprietary technology prevents mercury re-emission from Wet FGD Removes and retains over 95% of oxidized mercury in FGD Mercury removed with solids from FGD system Cost effective reagent Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..42

Wet FGD Reagent Feed System Injection Skid Feed Location Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..43

E.ON America s Mill Creek Unit 4 Louisville, KY 2007 DOE/EERC Phase III Mercury Testing B&W Wet FGD additive Absorption Plus(Hg) TM Mill Creek burns high sulfur bituminous coal Air quality control system consists of SCR + ESP + Wet FGD Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..44

E.ON. Mill Creek Mercury Control Tools Pulverizer SCR AH Absorption Plus(Hg) TM Injection Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..45

E.ON Mill Creek WFGD Outlet B&W WFGD Additive Absorption Plus @ 60 gph 60 gph Hg o re-emission Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..46

Powdered Activated Carbon Storage and Feed System PAC Storage Silo Feed System Injection System Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..47

Industry Challenges Hg re-emission emission in WFGDs PAC poisoning when burning high sulfur coal Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..48

Influence of SO 3 on Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..49

Dry Sorbent Injection (DSI) Technology Overview DSI = Dry Sorbent Injection DSI is based on dilute phase pneumatic conveying technology Major components are: Truck/rail unloading Silo Weigh hopper/rotary feeder Transport Air Blowers Reagent milling (optional) Not a new technology Used for SO 2 since 1980s Current applications for SO 2, SO 3, HCl and Hg B&W mobile test unit availablea ab Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..50

Texas Genco, Parish Plant Sub-bituminous Coal 650 MW SCR / FF / Wet FGD Low Chlorine PRB Coal Limestone Wet FGD for SO 2 Control Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..51

Parish Unit 8 Mercury Control Burns PRB Coal; Low Chlorine MercPlus TM Pulverizer SCR AH FF Absorption Plus (Hg) TM Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..52

MercPlus Fuel Additive for Low Halogen Coals Injected onto coal in coal feeders Increases oxidation of elemental mercury Co-benefits Hg removal with FGD Reduces or eliminates PAC consumption May allow use of standard PAC versus more costly brominated PAC Typical payback less than one year by reducing PAC consumption Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..53

Additive Injection Skid and Tank Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..54

Total Mercury Removal Across Wet FGD Scrubber CaCl 2 Only Wet FGD Additive Alone CaCl 2 and Wet FGD Additive al (%) ry Remova otal Mercur To Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..55

B&W s Dry FGD Mercury Control Options Boiler CaCl 2 Injection (if needed) d) PAC Injection SDA FF or ESP Coal Preparation Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..56

MercPlus Fuel Additive for Low Halogen Coals Injected onto coal in coal feeders Increases oxidation of elemental mercury Co-benefits Hg removal with FGD Reduces or eliminates PAC consumption May allow use of standard PAC versus more costly brominated PAC Typical payback less than one year by reducing PAC consumption Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..57

Powdered Activated Carbon Storage and Feed System PAC Storage Silo Feed System Injection System Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..58

Black Hills Power Wygen 1 Sub-bituminousbituminous Coal Nominal 80 MW Unit Wyodak Mine Coal B&W Opposed Wall-Fired Boiler SCR B&W SDA and PJFF Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..59

Wygen 1 Mercury Controls MercPlus TM Boiler PAC Injection Pulverizer Dry FGD Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..60

oval (%) Hg Rem Total 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Wygen 1 Parametric Mercury Tests Proprietary and Confidential 2010 Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc. All rights reserved..61

Thank You! Proprietary and Confidential 2009 The Babcock & Wilcox Company. All rights reserved..62