Cost of Service and Rates. Marty Blake The Prime Group, LLC

Similar documents
Introduction to Cost of Service Studies and Rate Design

Demand Charges to Deal With Net Energy Metering: Key Considerations

Beyond Net Metering Issues for Washington State

Agenda. Industry Rate Trends Summary of Financial Targets Cost of Service Information. Valuation of Solar

Electric Rate Design Introductory Principles Residential Rate Design

2017 Colorado Phase 2 Regulatory Rate Review Frequently asked questions

Understanding Impacts of Distributed Solar Generation on Cost Recovery and Rates IAMU Annual Energy Conference Preconference Seminar

Demand and Time of Use Rates. Marty Blake The Prime Group LLC

Smart Rate Design for a Smart Future

Annual KRTA Report for the Year 2016

Analysis of Impact of Mass Implementation of DER. Richard Fowler Adam Toth, PE Jeff Mueller, PE

SEPA Grid Evolution Summit: Rethinking Rate Design

Designing Distributed Generation Tariffs Well

Ratemaking Trends in the Utility Industry. Jeff Wernert The Prime Group, LLC

Frequently Asked Questions Trico Proposed Net Metering Tariff Modifications

Methodology of Cost Allocation

Electric Rate Action Proposal. February 2017

Technical Conference: Alternative Utility Cost Recovery Mechanisms

Michigan Renewable Energy Case Study

GENERAL INFORMATION 15. MARKET SUPPLY CHARGE ("MSC")

Reforming the TAC and Retail Transmission Rates. Robert Levin California Public Utilities Commission Energy Division August 29, 2017

Basic tariff guiding principles

SCHEDULE 10: General Residential

MERRILLAN MUNICIPAL ELECTRIC AND WATER UTILITY Commitment to Community Program Rider

Electric Rate Design as Though the Future Matters

PEC is continuously experiencing growth in its service territory. Weather and member growth are primary drivers for increased kwh sales.

SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT E-27 CUSTOMER GENERATION PRICE PLAN FOR RESIDENTIAL SERVICE

RIDER RTP REAL-TIME PRICING

PG&E s Commercial Electricity Vehicle Rate

Electric Vehicles: Opportunities and Challenges

EC Forum on Model Approaches to Distribution Pricing. June 2009

SECOND Quarter REPORT

SEP 2016 JUL 2016 JUN 2016 AUG 2016 HOEP*

Village of West Dundee Electric Aggregation Program

Demand Charges: A Less Equitable and Less Effective Rate Design Than TOU Energy Rates. Jim Lazar Senior Advisor The Regulatory Assistance Project

Are Fixed Charges an Answer to Tariff Design Challenges?

A guide to rate information & requirements for the interconnection of a solar distributed generating system

Utility Consumer Issues

Michigan Public Service Commission Michigan Net-Metering Case Study

Utility Rate Design for Solar PV Customers

New Initiatives in Distributed Energy Resources

Proposal Concerning Modifications to LIPA s Tariff for Electric Service

The Hoisington Utility Bill. A Presentation to the Utility Task Force

Rate Design Impacts for Customers of Maryland s Electric Cooperatives

Innovation in electricity retailing for EVs in New Zealand

SDG&E Customer Distributed Generation Programs. Steve Jaffe Senior Market Advisor Customer Innovations Group September 14, 2009

Most electricity consumers in the United States

FEB 2018 DEC 2017 JAN 2018 HOEP*

Electric Vehicle Charge Ready Program

Demystifying Your Utility Bill

GONE TOO FAR: SOARING HYDRO BILLS OFFSET CONSERVATION EFFORTS AND HURT CONSERVERS MOST

If you would like further information, please call or visit our Web site at

M E M O R A N D U M EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD

Illinois Solar Energy Association. Residential Rate Design Webinar August 25, 2016

Sustainable Rate Design for a Modern Grid

Tariff Design Issues: Approaches for Recovering Grid and System Costs

GREENVILLE UTILITIES COMMISSION ELECTRIC RIDER RR-4 PURCHASE POWER ADJUSTMENTS (PPA)

Revised Cal. P.U.C. Sheet No E Cancelling Revised Cal. P.U.C. Sheet No E

Zero Emission Bus Impact on Infrastructure

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

FINANCIAL AND OPERATING RATIOS. of Public Power Utilities

Rates and Billing Conservation & Renewable Energy Program (CARE) Hydro One Remote Communities Inc.

Village of Mount Prospect Electric Aggregation Program

Interdepartmental Memorandum

- To identify a common metric for comparison of water rates across user categories.

This rate schedule applies anywhere the City of Palo Alto provides Electric Service. Demand Charge (kw) $3.49 $20.35 $23.84

WHY SOLAR IS GOOD FOR YOU?

March 17, To: Nelson Hydro Customers

Review of Retail Electricity Tariffs

Electrical District No. 3 SOLAR Q & A

SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT E-21 PRICE PLAN FOR RESIDENTIAL SUPER PEAK TIME-OF-USE SERVICE

Communicating Cost Shifting Under Net Metering

JEA Distributed Generation Policy Effective April 1, 2018

Bill Calculation for monthly GS < 50 kw - TOU Rate Component Description Metric Rate Volume Volume x Rate Charge

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RICHARD M. LUTH. on behalf of

Making electricity billing fair

Submission on the Electricity ( Disconnections and Low Fixed Charges) Amendment Bill

Superseding Revised Sheet No. 63 REVISED SHEET NO. 63 Effective March 1, 2011 Effective September 1, 2012 ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT CLAUSE

Attached please find Chart House Energy s final comments on the DG Tariff U I hope this will help to consider a fair and reasonable tariff.

Important information, keep for your records.

SOLAR DISTRIBUTED GENERATION PROGRAM UPDATE

KAUAI ISLAND UTILITY COOPERATIVE KIUC Tariff No. 1 Lihue, Kauai, Hawaii First Revised Sheet 80 Cancels Original Sheet 80

Solar rooftop for Residential Sector. 10 th January,2017

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation d/b/a National Grid

Shedding Light on S lar Overview of Solar Finance

Initial Discussion on the Cost of Service Study and Rate Design. Special Board Meeting May 8, 2014

All of Texas Has Excellent Solar Resources. United States Solar Installed (as of mid 2013): 10 GW Germany Solar Installed (end of 2013): 35.

Secrets of Renewable Energy: The Real Truth. Robert B. Baker Freeman Mathis & Gary, LLP

Revised Cal. P.U.C. Sheet No E Cancelling Revised Cal. P.U.C. Sheet No E. San Francisco, California

II pepco. February 6, 2018

FOR COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND LIGHTING CUSTOMERS

WINDOM ELECTRIC UTILITY: RATE STUDY. Tim Miller Manager, Financial Analysis & Rates Missouri River Energy Services December 30, 2015

Florida s Solar Future is in Our Hands

Residential Rate Design and Electric Vehicles

The active consumer - a key player to unlock a carbon free future

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON PACIFICORP. Exhibit Accompanying Direct Testimony of Judith M. Ridenour

NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF PUBLIC UTILITIES AN ORDER OF THE BOARD NO. P.U. 17(2017)

Economics of Integrating Renewables DAN HARMS MANAGER OF RATE, TECHNOLOGY & ENERGY POLICY SEPTEMBER 2017

How to Translate Energy Bills. Sandra Diorka Delhi Charter Township

10 Costs Hidden in Your Energy Bill

Transcription:

Cost of Service and Rates Marty Blake The Prime Group, LLC

Cost of Service Study 2 Allocates the utility s costs to members as fairly as possible based on their energy usage patterns Three step process is used to allocate costs based on cost causation principles Functional Assignment Classification Allocation

Cost of Service Study Functional Classification Allocation Assignment Demand Purchased Residential Power Costs Energy All Costs Transmission Distribution Costs Demand Demand Customer Commercial 3 Other Customer Industrial

Rate Design Principles Members should pay the costs that they impose on the system Recover fixed costs through fixed charges Recover variable costs through variable charges Subsidies among members result if these principles are violated 4

Rate Components 5 Monthly Charge Covers the cost of the minimum set of equipment necessary to provide a member with grid access Charge per bill per month a.k.a. service charge, access charge, customer charge For example, $32.21 per meter per month

Why is the GLE Fixed Monthly Charge Higher than its Neighbors? Level of a utility s fixed monthly charge is a result of its ability to spread its fixed costs Customers Distribution Per Mile of Line Cost Per Line Customer Great Lakes Energy 8.7 $4,598 Consumers Energy 27.1 $1,476 6 Based on an installed cost of $40,000 per mile for single phase line

Rate Components Energy Charge - Charge per kwh per month Energy charge of 8.64 cents per kwh PSCR - difference between the purchased power included in base rates and the actual cost of purchased power Proposed PSCR factor of 1.415 cents per kwh 7

Combined Rate Classes 8 Three rate classes combined Residential Alternative Residential General Service Single Phase Fixed monthly charge $32.21 first meter $9.94 second meter Energy charge 8.64 /kwh PSCR of 1.415 /kwh

Combined Fixed Monthly Charge Operation and Mainenance Expenses $ 31,978,750 Depreciation $ 7,676,266 Taxes $ 143,059 Total Customer Related Costs $ 39,798,075 Total Customer Related Costs Monthly Customer Bills Customer Related Unit Costs 1st Meter $ 39,261,084 1,376,704 $ 28.52 $ $ 2nd Meter 536,991 59,676 9.00 Customer Related Margins Fixed Monthly Charge $ 3.69 $ 32.21 $ 0.94 $ 9.94 9

Variablizing Fixed Costs Residential and Seasonal $32.21 - $18.28 = $13.93 / meter / month 10 $13.93 x 1,333,156 = $18,570,863 in fixed costs associated with the minimum system that is variablized for Residential and Seasonal members For General Service Single Phase this same calculation results in $1,466,813 of variablized fixed cost

Variablizing Fixed Costs Total Amount Variablized = $18,570,863 + $1,466,813 = $20,037,676 $20,037,676 / 860,603,387 kwh = $0.0233/kWh in fixed cost associated with the minimum system recovered through energy 11

Impact of Existing Retail Rate Design 12 Monthly charge is $13.93 too low for Residential and Seasonal members and is $14.21 too low for General Service Single Phase members Energy charge is $0.0233/kWh too high Members buying large amount of kwh are subsidizing the fixed cost of the minimum system for low kwh usage members Currently don t recover minimum cost to provide service to 27,000 accounts 23%

Impact on Low Income Members 13 Average monthly consumption for low-income members and seniors on the Michigan Winter Protection Plan is 50 percent higher than others in their same residential rate class A recent analysis of more than 3,200 members receiving assistance from the Department of Human Services shows an average monthly usage of 922 kwh compared to the average residential member usage of 789 kwh

Impact on Low Income Members Because the current rate structure results in members with above average usage subsidizing the fixed cost of the minimum system for below average users, the typical low income member has been subsidizing low usage members like vacation homes, hunting cabins, fishing cabins, and boat docks 14

Margin Variability Revenue 15 Time

Benefits of Cost Based Rates Reduce revenue and margin volatility by recovering fixed costs through fixed charges Reduce member bill volatility Create the right environment for energy efficiency and energy conservation 16

Fixed Costs Not Recovered Under Current Rate Structure Energy Efficiency resulted in kwh usage dropping by 27 million kwh in the first three years of state program 27,000,000 x $0.0233 = $629,100 Through 2015, another 3% is targeted for each year or a reduction of almost 60 million kwh 60,000,000 x $0.0233 = $1,398,000 17

Residential Energy Bill Impacts 18 The breakeven point (no increase or decrease) is 822 kwh per month for residential, 209 kwh per month for seasonal and 866 kwh per month for general service single phase The largest possible increase is $13.93 for Residential and Seasonal and $14.21 for General Service Single phase with zero usage Members with below average usage have been having the cost of their minimum system subsidized by other members for years