G.U.N.T. Gerätebau GmbH

Similar documents
2. Write the expression for estimation of the natural frequency of free torsional vibration of a shaft. (N/D 15)

TYPICAL EXPERIMENTS Centers of gravity. Force triangle. Force polygon and Bow s Notation. Non- concurrent forces.

L15 Dynamics & Vibration Laboratory

LEVER OPTIMIZATION FOR TORQUE STANDARD MACHINES

DYNAMICS LABORATORY. AIM: To apply the knowledge gained in kinematics and dynamics of machines to real system.

STATIC AND DYNAMICS. Two Year Warranty

The Sommerfeld number is also a dimensionless parameter used extensively in the design of

Transverse Distribution Calculation and Analysis of Strengthened Yingjing Bridge

INSTRUCTION MANUAL HFN.15. Slipping Friction Apparatus

Study on Mechanism of Impact Noise on Steering Gear While Turning Steering Wheel in Opposite Directions

126 Ridge Road Tel: (607) PO Box 187 Fax: (607)

B.TECH III Year I Semester (R09) Regular & Supplementary Examinations November 2012 DYNAMICS OF MACHINERY

The new performance class...

Buckling of Pump Barrel and Rod String Stability in Pumping Wells

SOLUTIONS FOR SAFE HOT COIL EVACUATION AND COIL HANDLING IN CASE OF THICK AND HIGH STRENGTH STEEL

R10 Set No: 1 ''' ' '' '' '' Code No: R31033

Determination and improvement of bevel gear efficiency by means of loaded TCA

Stress/Strain Apparatus AP-8214

Suspension systems and components

TELESCOPIC RAIL HEAVY

White paper: Originally published in ISA InTech Magazine Page 1

Common position by FR and CEMA on mechanical couplings for towed vehicles 28/9/2015

Design, analysis and mounting implementation of lateral leaf spring in double wishbone suspension system

APPLICATION OF A NEW TYPE OF AERODYNAMIC TILTING PAD JOURNAL BEARING IN POWER GYROSCOPE

Bistable Rotary Solenoid

Development of Rattle Noise Analysis Technology for Column Type Electric Power Steering Systems

CHAPTER 6 MECHANICAL SHOCK TESTS ON DIP-PCB ASSEMBLY

Finite Element Modeling and Analysis of Vehicle Space Frame with Experimental Validation

Chapter 15. Inertia Forces in Reciprocating Parts

Experimental Question 1: Levitation of Conductors in an Oscillating Magnetic Field

ANALYSIS OF SURFACE CONTACT STRESS FOR A SPUR GEAR OF MATERIAL STEEL 15NI2CR1MO28

EXTRACT of chapter XXXIV coupling devices (version of ) ANNEX XXXIV Requirements on mechanical couplings

Chapter 15. Inertia Forces in Reciprocating Parts

Load cells for a Portable Structure

TITLE: EVALUATING SHEAR FORCES ALONG HIGHWAY BRIDGES DUE TO TRUCKS, USING INFLUENCE LINES

Simulating Rotary Draw Bending and Tube Hydroforming

Load Cell for Manually Operated Presses Model 8451

EMaSM. Outcome 1 Mechanical Measurement

Linear Actuator with Ball Screw Series OSP-E..S. Contents Description Overview Technical Data Dimensions 79

Research on Test Methods of Frame Torsional Rigidity Lu JIA1,2, Huanyun DAI1 and Ye SONG1

Dynamic Behavior Analysis of Hydraulic Power Steering Systems

Smart Automated Vent Register Using an SMA Spring Actuated Rotary Ratchet

Planetary Roller Type Traction Drive Unit for Printing Machine

MEASURING INSTRUMENTS. Basic Electrical Engineering (REE-101) 1

Metal forming machines: a new market for laser interferometers O. Beltrami STANIMUC Ente Federate UNI, via A. Vespucci 8, Tbrmo,

Key words: torque sensor, force sensor, torque measurement, embedded sensor, planar coils, pcb coils, ferrite, planar system

Differential Pressure Gauges Cryo Gauge Model , Cu-alloy Model , Stainless Steel Series

Linear Actuator with Ball Screw Series OSP-E..S. Contents Description Overview Technical Data Dimensions 89

Force Measurements in a Small Space. Dynamometers

International Conference on Mechanics, Materials and Structural Engineering (ICMMSE 2016)

Theory of Machines II EngM323 Laboratory User's manual Version I

EMC-HD. C 01_2 Subheadline_15pt/7.2mm

Electromagnetic Induction, Faraday s Experiment

Electric Motors and Drives

Section 10 Conveyors and Transport Components

Transmission Mechanism

Chapter 22: Electric motors and electromagnetic induction

Stress Analysis in Pulley of Stacker-Reclaimer by Using Fem Vs Analytical

Relative ride vibration of off-road vehicles with front-, rear- and both axles torsio-elastic suspension

CHAP: MACHINES Q: 1. Q: 1(Numerical) Answer Total length of crowbar =120 cm Load arm =20 cm Effort arm = =100 cm Q: 2

Simulation of Dynamics of System with Hydraulic Lines and Linear Hydraulic Motor with Mass Load

Vibration Analysis of an All-Terrain Vehicle

Active Suspensions For Tracked Vehicles

WEEK 4 Dynamics of Machinery

COMPRESSIBLE FLOW ANALYSIS IN A CLUTCH PISTON CHAMBER

LABORATORY MANUAL DYNAMICS OF MACHINE LAB

UNIT - III GYROSCOPE

The right twist for your machine. Torque motors 1FW6

Linear Shaft Motors in Parallel Applications

ROTARY MODULES. Rotary modules

Analysis Methods for Skewed Structures. Analysis Types: Line girder model Crossframe Effects Ignored

Design and Vibrational Analysis of Flexible Coupling (Pin-type)


Differential pressure gauge Model , copper alloy Model , stainless steel version

Basic Instruments Introduction Classification of instruments Operating principles Essential features of measuring

CB50X & CB50X-DL load cells Influence factors in weighbridge application

Linear Drive with Ball Screw Drive Series OSP-E..SB

Distance: ±2000mm 1 Eden Court, Leighton Buzzard,

A CASTOR WHEEL CONTROLLER FOR DIFFERENTIAL DRIVE WHEELCHAIRS

Shaft-Hub-Connections

The Effect of Spring Pressure on Carbon Brush Wear Rate

Numerical modelling of the rutting and pavement response with non-uniform tyre/pavement contact stress distributions

Wheel Load Scales WL 101. Operating Instructions

MAGNETIC EFFECTS ON AND DUE TO CURRENT-CARRYING WIRES

Modeling of 17-DOF Tractor Semi- Trailer Vehicle

Tension and Compression Load Cell Model 8435

To study the constructional features of ammeter, voltmeter, wattmeter and energymeter.

Plate Girder and Stiffener

A Practical Guide to Free Energy Devices

1064. Conversion and its deviation control of electric switch machine of high speed railway turnout

Mechanisms and Structures. Mechanical Systems. Levers. Basic Forces

Performance Testing of Composite Bearing Materials for Large Hydraulic Cylinders

P. D. Belapurkar, S.D. Mohite, M.V. Gangawane, D. D. Doltode (Department of Mechanical, M.E.S. College of Engineering, S.P. Pune University, India)

Field test and numerical studies of the scissors-avlb type bridge

Prediction of Thermal Deflection at Spindle Nose-tool Holder Interface in HSM

OPTIMUM DESIGN OF OVERHEAD CRANE GIRDERS UNDER MOVING LOADS

Special edition paper

Crossed Roller Ways. Description of each series and Table of dimensions. Anti-Creep Cage Crossed Roller Way

ME scope Application Note 29 FEA Model Updating of an Aluminum Plate

TNO Science and Industry P.O. Box 756, 5700 AT Helmond, The Netherlands Honda R&D Co., Ltd.

Transcription:

Equipment for Engineering Education Experiment Instructions WP950 Deformation of Straight Beams G.U.N.T. Gerätebau GmbH P.O. Box 1125 D - 22881 Barsbüttel Germany Phone+49 40 670 854-0 Fax +49 40 670 854-42 E-Mail: sales@gunt.de

Experiment Instructions Publication No.: 912.000 00A 950 12 07/08

Table of contents 1 Introduction...................................... 1 2 Unit description................................... 2 3 Experiments..................................... 4 3.1 Bending on the cantilever bar.............................. 4 3.1.1 Deflection at the point of application of force............ 4 3.1.2 Performing the experiment.......................... 5 3.1.3 Determining the elastic line.......................... 7 3.1.4 Performing the experiment.......................... 8 3.2 Bar on two supports..................................... 10 3.2.1 Measurement of the supporting forces................ 10 3.2.2 Performing the experiment......................... 11 3.2.3 Elastic line for centre loading....................... 13 3.2.4 Performing the experiment......................... 14 3.3 Maxwell-Betti s influence coefficients and law................. 16 3.3.1 Performing the experiment......................... 17 3.4 Statically undetermined systems........................... 19 3.4.1 Calculation of the supporting force................... 20 3.4.2 Performing the experiment......................... 21 4 Appendix....................................... 23 4.1 Technical data......................................... 23 4.2 Formulae and units used................................. 24 4.3 Index................................................ 25

1 Introduction The WP 950 device for deformation of straight beams permits a broad spectrum of experiments on the deformation of a bending bar. The experiments include - Elastic line under different support conditions - Elastic line under different loads - Demonstration of the Maxwell-Betti law - Supporting forces in statically undetermined systems The loads are applied in a visual manner using sets of weights. Deformation of the bar is measured using dial gauges. Supporting forces can be determined via the dynamometers integrated in the supports. Bars of various materials are available in order to demonstrate the influence of the modulus of elasticity on deflection. By using very thin, elastic bars, deformation of the bar under load can be seen very clearly, even without dial gauges. Accordingly, the device is not only suitable for practical experiments, but is also ideal for demonstration in the classroom. The dynamometers have large, clear scales and can easily be read from some distance away. 1

2 Unit description 12 4 8 7 2 2 2 5 3 7 6 1 The bar bending device consists of a light, stable frame (1) made of aluminium. The various supports (2,3) are fastened to the lower girder with clamping levers. The dial gauges (4) are fastened to the upper girder with holders. The load weights (5) are attached to the bar (7) via movable riders (6). The riders can be locked in position. The load can be adjusted in increments of 25 N using weight blocks. 5 10 9 2 8 The articulated supports (2) are fitted with dynamometers (8). The height of the support can be adjusted using a threaded spindle (9). The support can be locked in position by the screw (10). This compensates deformation of the bar by its own weight or deflection of the support caused by spring excursion of the dynamometer. 2

In statically undetermined systems, it is possible to demonstrate the influence of support deflection on load distribution. The scales on the dynamometers (8) rotate to enable taring. 12 4 11 7 3 The bar (7) is fixed in the support with clamp (3) by means of a clamping plate (11). The height of the dial gauges (4) can be adjusted on their holders (12). 3

3 Experiments Below are descriptions of some of the experiments which can be performed with the WP950. They represent only a small proportion of the experiments which are possible with the device and should provide ideas for other experiments. 3.1 Bending on the cantilever bar 3.1.1 Deflection at the point of application of force f F L E, Iy Cantilever beam The aim of this experiment is to check the mathematically determined deflection of the cantilever bar. In a cantilever bar, one side of the bar is fixed and the other side free. This is known as a tri-valent support which transmits normal force, transverse force and moment. The bar is therefore supported in a statically determined manner. The equation for the deflection f of the bar at the point of application of force is f = F L3 3 E I y Deflection is proportional to the load F and inversely proportional to the modulus of elasticity E and planar moment of intertia (PMI) Iy. The length of the bar is cubed. The influence of the lenght L should be demonstated in this experiment. For this purpose, the force should be constant. The experimental bar is made of steel (modulus of elasticity E = 210000 N/mm 2 ) and has a crosssection of 20 x 6 mm 2. This produces a PMI of 4

I y = b h3 12 = 6 203 = 360 mm 4 12 With these values and a load of 17.5 N (suspender 2.5N + 3 weights 5N), the following deflection values are achieved: 3.1.2 Performing the experiment Deflection of the cantilever bar according to length Lenght L in mm 300 2.08 400 4.94 500 9.64 The experiment is set up as shown in the diagram. The following equipment is required: - Steel bar 6 x 20 x 1000 mm (7) - Rider for weight (6) - Suspender for weights (5) - 3 weights 5N - Dial gauge with holder (4, 12) - Support pillar with clamp (3) Deflection f in mm Deflection f 12 4 6 7 Lenght L Clamp 3 Load F 5 5

- Fasten the support pillar to the frame - Clamp the bar in the support pillar 5 Tracer pin Flattened part Rider Twist scale - Place the rider on the bar and lock in the required position - Fasten the dial gauge to the frame with the holder in such a way that the tracer pin is touching the flattened part of the rider bolt - Set the dial gauge to zero with the bar unloaded. To do so, adjust the holder and rotate the scale for precise adjustment - Suspend the load weight, read the deflection on the dial gauge and record The following table compares the results of the experiment with the results of the mathematical calculation. Comparision between measured and calculated deflections Lenght L in mm Measured deflection in mm 300 2.45 2.08 400 5.4 4.94 500 10.2 9.64 Calculated deflection in mm The consistency can be described as good. The measured deflection values are all slightly too high. It is possible that the modulus of elasticity of the material itself does not match the one assumed for the calculation. 6

3.1.3 Determining the elastic line This experiment measures the elastic line of a cantilever bar and compares it with the result of the mathematical calculation. w(0) F x x2 Section I Section II w(b) α b a L Elastic line of a cantilever bar The equation for the elastic line of a cantilever bar loaded with a single force is as follows for the loaded section II with 0 x 2 a w(x 2 ) = F a3 6 E I 2 3 x 2 y a + x 3 2 a 3. In the unloaded section I between the point of application of the force and the free end, the deflection is a linear function of the length and the inclination α in the point of application of force. This is not bending, but slanting Where w(x) = w(b) + (b x) α. w(b) = F a3 3 E I y und α = F a2 2 E I y. For a load of F = 17.5 N where a = 500 mm, the following deflection values are achieved: Elastic line of a cantilever bar x in mm Deflection f in mm 0 18.33 100 15.43 200 12.74 300 9.65 400 6.79 500 4.17 600 2.00 700 0.54 800 0 7

3.1.4 Performing the experiment The experiment is set up as described in 3.1.2. Distance x Lenght a = 500mm Load F The load remains constant and is applied at a= 500 mm. The deflection of the bar is measured at intervals of 100 mm with the dial gauge - Relieve the bar - Apply the dial gauge at the required position and set to zero - Load the bar - Read the deflection value and record - Relieve the bar and move the dial gauge to the next position Repeat the measuring procedure Elastic line of cantilever bar x in mm Measured deflection in mm 0 18.7 18.33 100 15.9 15.43 200 13.0 12.74 300 10.2 9.65 400 7.3 6.79 500 4.65 4.17 600 2.3 2.00 700 0.8 0.54 Calculated deflection in mm 8

The values determined can be recorded in a graph as an elastic line. The calculation and the measurement are very consistent. The linear pattern is clearly recognisable in section I. 0 Calculated Deflection in mm 5 Measured Section I 10 Section II 15 20 0 200 400 600 800 Distance x in mm Elastic line of a cantilever bar 9

3.2 Bar on two supports 3.2.1 Measurement of the supporting forces The articulated supports are fitted with dynamometers to measure the supporting forces. This experiment determines the supporting forces for a bar depending on the point of application of the load x. The supporting forces A and B can be determined via balances of moments. Balance of moments around support B L Σ M B = 0 = F (L x) A L A x F Supporting forces on the bar B Supporting force A A = F ( 1 x L ) Balance of moments around support A Σ M A = 0 = B L F x Supporting force B B = F x L. A bar with a length L=1000 mm and a load of F=20 N produces the following supporting forces A and B. The sum of the supporting forces must correspond to the load. Supporting forces at a load of F = 20 N (values for one half only; the other half is symmetrical) Distance x from support A in mm Supporting force A in N Supporting force B in N 0 20 0 100 18 2 200 16 4 300 14 6 400 12 8 500 (Centre) 10 10 10

3.2.2 Performing the experiment The experiment is set up as shown in the diagram. The following equipment is required: - Steel bar 6 x 20 x 1000 mm (4) - Rider for weight (6) - Suspender for weights (5) - 3 weights 5N, 1 weight 2.5 N - 2 articulated supports (2) with dynamometer (7) 3 2 Load F 6 5 4 The load of 20 N is applied in the centre at x= 500 mm. - Fasten the articulated supports (2) at a distance of 1000 mm - Push the rider (6) for the weight suspender onto the bar (4) and place the bar on the supports 2 3 1 4 - Loosen the locking screw (1) on the support (2). Adjust the height of the support using the rotary knob (3) until the bar (4) is horizontal. Re-secure the support using the locking screw (1) 11

7 - Set the scale on the dynamometer (7) to zero by twisting 5 - Suspend the weight (5) and load the bar 7 - Read the supporting forces on the dynamometers (7) and record The measured supporting forces are very consistent with the calculated values. Measured suporting forces at a load of F = 20 N (values for one half only; the other half is symmetrical) Distance x from support A in mm Support force A in N 0 20 0 100 18.3 1.7 200 16 4 300 14.3 5.7 400 12 8 500 (Centre) 10 10 Support force B in N 12

3.2.3 Elastic line for centre loading This experiment measures the elastic line of a bar on two supports and compares it with the mathematically calculated result. The equation for the elastic line of a bar loaded in the centre with a single force is as follows for the section between the left-hand support and the load with 0 x L 2 x F w(x) = F L 3 48 E I y 3 x L 4 x3 L 3. Bar on two supports f w(x) The section between the load and the right-hand support is symmetrical to this. The maximum deflection is at the centre of the bar where x = L 2 directly beneath the load f = F L 3 48 E I y. The following deflection values are achieved for a 1000 mm long bar with a load of F = 20 N at x = 500 mm: Elastic line of a bar on two supports (only one half; the other half is symmetrical) x in mm 0 0 100 1.63 200 3.13 300 4.36 400 5.20 Deflection w in mm 500 (Centre of bar) 5.51 (max. deflection) 13

3.2.4 Performing the experiment Dial gauge (8) for support deflection The experiment is set up as shown in the diagram. The following equipment is required: - Steel bar 6 x 20 x 1000 mm (4) - Rider for weight (6) - Suspender for weights (5) - 3 weights 5N, 1 weight 2.5 N - 2 articulated supports (2) with dynamometer (7) - 3 dial gauges with holder (4,8) The load remains constant and is applied in the centre at x= 500 mm. Left support (2) Right support (2) 6 4 7 Force F 5 Dial gauge (4) for bar deflection 7 3 1 The deflection of the bar is measured with the dial gauge (4) at intervals of 100 mm. Two dial gauges (8) on the supports (2) measure the deflection due to the dynamometer (7) - Relieve the bar - Loosen the locking screw (1) on the support. Adjust the height of the support using the rotary knob (3) until the dial gauges (8) read zero. - Fasten the supports using the locking screw (1) - Place the dial gauge (4) in the required position and set to zero - Load the bar 14

Excursion f of the supports x w(x) Measurement of the elastic line L F The dynamometers experience spring excursion under load. In order to prevent measurement errors as a result of this additional deflection f, the supports should be returned to their original position. - Loosen the locking screw (1) on the support. Raise the support using the rotary knob (3) until the dial gauges (8) read zero. Fasten the support using the locking screw (1) - Read the deflection value from the dial gauge (4) and record - Relieve the bar, move the dial gauge to the next position, and repeat the measurement. Elastic line of a bar on two supports x in mm Measured deflection w(x) in mm 0 0 0 100 1.3 1.63 200 2.8 3.13 300 4.0 4.36 400 4.6 5.20 500 5.1 5.51 Calculated deflection w(x) in mm The measured deflections are slightly too low. The following graph compares the measured elastic line with the calculated elastic line: 0 Deflection w(x) in mm 1 2 3 4 Calculated Measured 5 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Distance x in mm Elastic line of bar on two supports 15

3.3 Maxwell-Betti s influence coefficients and law Influence coefficients link the deflection at a certain point in the bar to the loading of the bar. In general, the deflection wi for a point xi can be specified as the function of n forces Fj as follows: n w i = a ij F j. j=1 This experiment is only intended to examine the effect of a force on points x1 and x2 on the deflection at points x1 and x2 F1 w1 w1 F1 x1 x2 F2 w2 F2 w2 w 1 = a 11 F 1 w 1 = a 12 F 2 w 2 = a 21 F 1 w 2 = a 22 F 2 According to the Maxwell-Betti transposition law, deflection at point x1 as a result of the force on point x2 is just as large as the deflection at point x2 caused by an identical force on point x1. This correlation is described by the following formula w 1 = a 12 F 2 = w 2 = a 21 F 1 a 21 = a 12 In general, according to Maxwell-Betti, the following applies a ij = a ji The two influence coefficients a11 and a22 indicate the deflection at the point of force. 16

3.3.1 Performing the experiment The experiment is set up as shown in the diagram. The following equipment is required: - Steel bar 6 x 20 x 1000 mm - Rider for weight - Suspender for weights - 3 weights 5N, 1 weight 2.5 N - 2 articulated supports with dynamometer - 3 dial gauges with holder x1 = 300 mm x2 = 600 mm The distance between the supports is 1000 mm. The load of 20 N remains constant and is applied at x1= 300 mm and x2 = 600 mm. The deflection of the bar at points x1 and x2 is measured with the dial gauge. Two dial gauges on the supports measure the deflection caused by the dynamometers and serve to compensate it. The procedure is the same as described in the previous experiment. 17

- Load the bar at point x1 and measure the deflection at x1 and x2. - Load the bar at x2 and measure the deflection at x1 and x2 Influence coefficients for bars on two supports Deflection at point in mm Force at point in mm Deflection w in mm Influence coefficient in mm/n x1= 300 x1= 300 3.1 a11= 0.155 x1= 300 x2= 600 3.5 a12= 0.175 x2= 600 x1= 300 3.5 a21= 0.175 x2= 600 x2= 600 4.3 a22= 0.215 From the load and the deflections, it is possible to calculate the influence coefficients. As predicted, the influence coefficients a12 and a21 are identical. 18

3.4 Statically undetermined systems A statically undetermined system exists when the valency of the support is greater than the number of degrees of freedom of the system. A system in the plane, such as the bar, has 3 degrees of freedom: - horizontal displacement - vertical displacement - rotation in the plane A movable support (articulated support) is monovalent, as it only prevents vertical motion. A clamp (support pillar) is tri-valent, since in addition to vertical motion, it also prevents horizontal motion and rotation. If a bar is clamped on one side and supported by a movable support on the other side, the sum of all support valencies is 4, in other words, larger than the number of degrees of freedom (3). The bar is statically undetermined, or more precisely, it is statically overdetermined. In such cases, the unknown support reactions, whose number corresponds to the sum of the support valencies, cannot be calculated solely by means of the equilibrium relations of the forces and moments. In such a case, there are only as many equations which are independent of one another as there are degrees of freedom. In order to be able to calculate the numerous unknown support reactions, equations with the deformation properties of the bar must be used. By applying the superposition principle, the experimental approach is similar to the calculatory approach. 19

3.4.1 Calculation of the supporting force ff fa f=ff+fa=0 A F Deformation due to load Deformation due to supportr Total deformation must be zeron Superposition principle F L a The superposition principle states that the sum of all deformations caused by individual loads corresponds to the deformation caused by a combined load from the individual loads. Therefore, the system is loaded with the individual loads, one after the other, and from the calculatory summation of these individual results, it is possible to determine the overall deformation of a combined load occurring simultaneously. In order to determine the unknown supporting force, the total deformation at the front end of the bar must be zero. Consequently, the deformation induced by supporting force A must be just as large as but opposite to the one induced by the load F. According to experiment 3.1.3, the deformation at the end of the bar caused by the load F is f F = w(b) + b α = F a3 3 E I y + F (L a) a2 2 E I y. The deformation at the end of the bar due to supporting force A is calculated as follows: f A = A L3 3 E I y. The sum of both deformations must be zero f F + f A = 0 = F a 3 3 E I y + F (L a) a2 2 E I y A L3 3 E I y. Solving the equation with respect to the unknown supporting force produces: A = F 2 L 3 ( 3 L a2 a 3 ). 20

With a load of F= 15 N, a length L= 800 mm and a distance a= 500 mm, this produces the following for the unknown supporting force A: A = 15 2 800 3 ( 3 800 5002 500 3 ) = 6.96 N 3.4.2 Performing the experiment The experiment is set up as shown in the diagram. The following equipment is required: - Steel bar 6 x 20 x 1000 mm - Rider for weight - Suspender for weights - 2 weights 5N, 1 weight 2.5 N - Articulated support with dynamometer - Support pillar with clamp - Dial gauge with holder L= 800 mm a= 500 mm The articulated support has a distance of 800 mm from the clamp, and the load 500 mm from the clamp. The dial gauge is positioned above the articulated support 21

25 mm - Twist the articulated support downwards. The distance between the unloaded end and the support should be at least 25 mm - Whilst unloaded, set the dial gauge at the end of the bar to zero f=ff - Load the bar with 15 N. The bar will deflect downwards at the end by ff= 16.2 mm f=ff+fa=0 A = 6.7 N - Twist the support upwards to compensate the deflection by load. The dial gauge should return to zero. The dynamometer will now display the supporting force. Reading produces a supporting force of 6.7 N. A comparison with the mathematically calculated result of 6.96 N indicates good consistency. To check, the unloaded bar can be raised by fa= 16.2 mm via the support. The dynamometer should then likewise show 6.7 N. 22

4 Appendix 4.1 Technical data Number of sets of weights: 4 Weight graduation: 16 x 5 N 4 x 2.5 N Number of supports: articulated 3 fixed 1 Measurement range of dynamometers: 40N Measurement range of dial gauges: 20mm Test bars Steel 90MnCrV8 3 x 20 x 1000 mm 4 x 20 x 1000 mm 6 x 20 x 1000 mm Brass CuZn39Pb3 6 x 20 x 1000 mm AluminiumAlMgSi0,5F22 6 x 20 x 1000 mm Dimensions L x W x H: 1400x400x750 mm Weight: 40 kg 23

4.2 Formulae and units used Formulae: a, aij: A : b : B : E : f : F : h : Iy: L : M : w : x : α : Units: Distance, influence coefficient Supporting force Width of cross-section, distance Supporting force Modulus of elasticity Deflection Force, load Height of cross-section Planar moment of inertia Length Bending moment Deflection downwards Longitudinal coordinate of bar Inclination Force: N Length, width, height: mm Deflection, deflection downwards: mm Modulus of elasticity: N/mm 2 Planar moment of inertia: mm 4 Inclination: rad 24

4.3 Index A B C D E F I L M P S T V adjusting height of support...................... 11 articulated supports............................. 2 balance of moments........................... 10 bar on two supports........................... 10 cantilever bar............................... 4, 7 clamp...................................... 19 deflection.................................... 4 degrees of freedom............................ 19 dial gauges................................... 3 dynamometers................................ 2 elastic line.................................... 7 equation for the deflection....................... 4 equation for the elastic line.................... 7, 13 experiments.................................. 4 formulae:.................................... 24 influence coefficients.......................... 16 load weights.................................. 2 Maxwell-Betti s influence coefficients.............. 16 movable support.............................. 19 planar moment of intertia........................ 4 statically undetermined systems.................. 19 superposition principle......................... 19 support with clamp............................. 3 supporting forces............................. 10 technical data................................ 23 test bars.................................... 23 units....................................... 24 valency of the support.......................... 19 25