AAE STAGING. Ch3 46

Similar documents
6. The Launch Vehicle

Typical Rocketry Exam Questions

Suitability of reusability for a Lunar re-supply system

Fly Me To The Moon On An SLS Block II

Rocket 101. IPSL Space Policy & Law Course. Andrew Ratcliffe. Head of Launch Systems Chief Engineers Team

Development of a Low Cost Suborbital Rocket for Small Satellite Testing and In-Space Experiments

Space Propulsion. An Introduction to.

Ares I Overview. Phil Sumrall Advanced Planning Manager Ares Projects NASA MSFC. Masters Forum May 14, 2009

CHAPTER 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION TO LM-3C

Blue Origin Achievements and plans for the future

Review of iterative design approach Mass Estimating Relationships (MERs) Sample vehicle design analysis

SOYUZ-IKAR-FREGAT 1. IDENTIFICATION. 1.1 Name. 1.2 Classification Family : SOYUZ Series : SOYUZ Version : SOYUZ-IKAR SOYUZ-FREGAT

Space Propulsion. An Introduction to. Stephen Hevert Visiting Assistant Professor Metropolitan State College of Denver

Martin J. L. Turner. Expedition Mars. Published in association with. Chichester, UK

AN OPTIMIZED PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR Soyuz/ST

THE FALCON I LAUNCH VEHICLE Making Access to Space More Affordable, Reliable and Pleasant

Ares V Overview. presented at. Ares V Astronomy Workshop 26 April 2008

USA FALCON 1. Fax: (310) Telephone: (310) Fax: (310) Telephone: (310) Fax: (310)

SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM (SLS)

MISSION OVERVIEW SLC-41

Ares V: Supporting Space Exploration from LEO to Beyond

Development of Low Cost Propulsion Systems for Launchand In Space Applications

TOWARDS A HEAVY LAUNCHER - PROPULSION SOLUTIONS - A. Souchier - C. Rothmund Snecma Moteurs, Direction Grosse Propulsion à Liquides

ENERGIA 1. IDENTIFICATION. 1.1 Name. 1.2 Classification Family : K Series : K-1/SL-17 Version : 4 strap-ons

The GHOST of a Chance for SmallSat s (GH2 Orbital Space Transfer) Vehicle

VEGA SATELLITE LAUNCHER

Subjects: Thrust Vectoring ; Engine cycles; Mass estimates. Liquid Bipropellant rockets are usually "gimballed" to change the thrust vector.

Cable Dragging Horizontal Takeoff Spacecraft Air Launch System

Size of Boost-Phase Region of Ballistic Missile Flight

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) June 2001

Pre-Launch Procedures

A LEO Propellant Depot System Concept for Outgoing Exploration

CHAPTER 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION TO LM-2E

Travel: Detailed Flight Plan

Mass Estimating Relations

MISSION OVERVIEW SLC-41 CCAFS, FL

AEROSPACE TEST OPERATIONS

Lunar Cargo Capability with VASIMR Propulsion

NASA s Choice to Resupply the Space Station

CONCEPT STUDY OF AN ARES HYBRID-OS LAUNCH SYSTEM

Transportation Options for SSP

Lunar Surface Access from Earth-Moon L1/L2 A novel lander design and study of alternative solutions

LUNAR INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH BASE. Yuzhnoye SDO proprietary

Current Launch System Industrial Base

Performance Evaluation of a Side Mounted Shuttle Derived Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle for Lunar Exploration

Mass Estimating Relations

AIR LAUNCH AEROSPACE INTERNATIONAL PROJECT

Notes: GENERAL DYNAMICS EARLY LUNAR ACCESS [1993]

FACT SHEET SPACE SHUTTLE EXTERNAL TANK. Space Shuttle External Tank

USA DELTA DELTA Mc DONNELL DOUGLAS SPACE SYSTEMS

SPACE PROPULSION SIZING PROGRAM (SPSP)

Vehicle Reusability. e concept e promise e price When does it make sense? MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Vehicle Reusability

CONTENTS Duct Jet Propulsion / Rocket Propulsion / Applications of Rocket Propulsion / 15 References / 25

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Mass Estimating Relations

Enhanced. Chapter 3. Baseline

Upper Stage Evolution

THE BIMESE CONCEPT: A STUDY OF MISSION AND ECONOMIC OPTIONS

H-IIA Launch Vehicle Upgrade Development

Antares Rocket Launch recorded on 44 1 Beyond HD DDR recorders Controlled by 61 1 Beyond Systems total

On Orbit Refueling: Supporting a Robust Cislunar Space Economy

Atlas V Launches the Orbital Test Vehicle-1 Mission Overview. Atlas V 501 Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, FL Space Launch Complex 41

Reentry Demonstration Plan of Flare-type Membrane Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Vehicle using a Sounding Rocket

How Does a Rocket Engine Work?

Taurus II. Development Status of a Medium-Class Launch Vehicle for ISS Cargo and Satellite Delivery

July 28, ULA Rideshare Capabilities

Preliminary Cost Analysis MARYLAND

SpaceLoft XL Sub-Orbital Launch Vehicle

Deployment and Drop Test for Inflatable Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Capsule with using Large Scientific Balloon

High Performance Green Propulsion (HPGP): A Flight-Proven Capability and Cost Game-Changer for Small and Secondary Satellites Aaron Dinardi

Mountain Launch System utilizing gravity assisted launch. Keith Watts May 3, 2014

Deployment and Flight Test of Inflatable Membrane Aeroshell using Large Scientific Balloon

Welcome to Vibrationdata

USA ATHENA 1 (LLV 1)

SMILE - Small Innovative Launcher for Europe

apply to all. space because it is an air-breather. Although from the atmosphere to burn its fuel. This limits

From MARS To MOON. V. Giorgio Director of Italian Programs. Sorrento, October, All rights reserved, 2007, Thales Alenia Space

The SABRE engine and SKYLON space plane

Centurion: A Heavy-Lift Launch Vehicle Family for Cis- Lunar Exploration

An Innovative Two Stage-to-Orbit Launch Vehicle Concept

Station for Exploratory Analysis and Research Center for Humanity (SEARCH)

lights on, down 2 ½ 40 feet, down 2 ½ Kickin up some dust 30 feet, 2 ½ down faint shadow

EXTENDED GAS GENERATOR CYCLE

The Falcon 1 Flight 3 - Jumpstart Mission Integration Summary and Flight Results. AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, 2008 Paper SSC08-IX-6

GK L A U N C H SER VICES MOSCOW 2017

Cost Estimation and Engineering Economics

Paper Session II-A - Lockheed Martin's Next Generation Launch Systems

Baikonur, February 2000

Architecture Options for Propellant Resupply of Lunar Exploration Elements

CHAPTER 6 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS

LOW RECOIL, HEAT TRANSFER MITIGATING RAREFACTION WAVE GUN ENGINEERING, MODELING AND LARGE CALIBER SYSTEM DEMONSTRATOR DEVELOPMENT

In-Space Demonstration of HighPerformance Green Propulsion (HPGP) and its Impact on Small Satellites

Parametric Design MARYLAND

Precision Paper Space Models

Advanced Propulsion Concepts for the HYDRA-70 Rocket System

Success of the H-IIB Launch Vehicle (Test Flight No. 1)

NASA s Space Launch System Marks Critical Design Review

2012 Cubesat Workshop. ULA Rideshare Update APR 19, 2012

Georgia Tech NASA Critical Design Review Teleconference Presented By: Georgia Tech Team ARES

Welcome to Aerospace Engineering

Transcription:

3.7 STAGING Ch3 46

STAGING PHILOSOPHY Staging Strategy: Reduces effective mission-averaged mass ratio. Serial staging is more effective. Parallel staging ( strap-ons ) simpler, especially to upgrade existing system. # of stages must be balanced with additional complexity. Staging Configurations Definitions: Booster Stage First (lowest) stage, Largest stage providing the largest thrust and total impulse. Sustainer Stage Upper (subsequent) stage, Thrust becomes smaller. Half Stage or Zero Stage Boosters operate in parallel to first stage, Strap-on solid propellant motors. Ch3 47

NOMENCLATURE Vehicle consists of N stages, Stage: j = any of the stages, Mass Definitions for arbitrary stage n < N: m 0n = initial mass of stage n, m fn = burnout mass of stage n, m PL = payload mass of the last stage to fire, 1 j N Structural Ratio (Coefficient, Factor): ε j = m f j m 0 j NOTE for top stage where n=n ε N = m fn m PL m 0N m PL Payload Ratio (Coefficient, Factor): NOTE for top stage where n=n λ N = m PL m 0N λ j = N m 0 j j+1 N m 0 j j Ch3 48

DEFINITIONS Mass Ratio Definitions for Staged Vehicle: Stage Mass Ratio R (MR): Mass of the vehicle at ignition of the j th stage divided by its mass at burnout of the j th stage N 1 m R i=j 0i j = R j = ε j (1 λ j ) + λ j N m f j + m i=j+1 0i MR j = ε j (1 λ j ) + λ j Propellant Mass Fraction is a measure of the structural efficiency, or what proportion of the mass of the system goes toward developing thrust and moving a payload. Stage Velocity Increment: Δv j = u eq,j lnr j = g 0 I sp,j ln 1 MR j Final Velocity Increment Δv f = N j=1 Δv j ζ j = m Pj m 0 j = m Pj m Pj + m inert,j = Δv 1 + Δv 2 + Δv 3 + = u eq,1 lnr 1 + u eq,2 lnr 2 + u eq,3 lnr 3 + Ch3 49

STAGING PAYOFF Effect of Staging on Performance Ch3 50

EXAMPLE Ch3 51

Staging - Examples World-wide launcher scenario 2001 for payloads above 3000 kg in GTO. Launcher Delta III Atlas2AS H2A Proton AR44L CZ3B Zenit 3 Titan4B AR5 Delta IVH Country USA USA Japan Russia Europe China Ukraine USA Europe USA Ch3 52

3.8 VEHICLES Ch3 53

Launch Vehicle Ch3 54

Atlas Trajectory Profile Ch3 55

Launch Vehicle Saturn V Liftoff Thrust: 33,737.90 kn Total Mass: 3,038,500 kg Core Diameter: 10.06 m Total Length: 102.00 m Launches 13 Success Rate: 100% First Launch Date: 09 Nov 1967 Last Launch Date: 14 May 1973 LEO Payload: 118,000 kg to 185 km orbit at 28.0 degrees. Payload: 47,000 kg to a translunar trajectory. Development Cost: $7,439.60M in 1966 average dollars. Launch Price: $ 431M in 1967 dollars. Ch3 56

Launch Vehicle STAGES OF THE SATURN V BOOSTER FIRST STAGE SECOND STAGE THIRD STAGE APOLLO DIAMETER 33' 33' 21' 8" 21' 8" LENGTH 138' 81' 6" 58' 7" 81' 10¼" WEIGHT 4,792,000 lbf (fueled) 1,037,000 lbf (fueled) 262,000 lbf (fueled) 109,608 lbf ENGINES five F-1 rocket engines five J-2 rocket engines one J-2 rocket engine - PROPELLANT kerosene & LOX LH 2 & LOX LH 2 & LOX - THRUST 7.5 million lbf 1 million lbf 200,000 lbf - 1st BURNTIME 2 min, 50 sec 6 min, 35 sec 2 min, 45 sec - VELOCITY at 1st burnout 6,200 mph 15,400 mph 17,500 mph - ALTITUDE at 1st burnout 36 miles 114-118 miles 115 miles - 2nd BURNTIME - - 5 min, 12 sec - VELOCITY at 2nd burnout - - 24,300 mph Translunar injection to 60 nmi above moon - ALTITUDE at 2nd burnout - - - - Ch3 57

Saturn V - Stage 1 Gross Mass: 2,286,217 kg Empty Mass: 135,218 kg Thrust (vac): 38,716 kn Isp: 304 s (vac), 265 s (SL) Burn time: 161 sec Propellants: Lox/Kerosene Diameter: 10.06 m Span: 19.0 m Length: 42.1 m No. Engines: 5, F-1 Thrust (vac): 7,7433 kn Mass Engine: 8,391 kg Diameter: 3.72m Length: 5.64m Chambers: 1 Chamber Pressure: 70 bar Area Ratio: 16.00 Oxidizer to Fuel Ratio: 2.27 Thrust to Weight Ratio: 94.07 Ch3 58

Saturn V - Stage 2 Saturn II Gross Mass: 490,778 kg Empty Mass: 39,048 kg Thrust (vac): 5,1676 kn Isp: 421 s (vac), 200 s (SL) Burn time: 390 s Propellants: Lox/LH2 Diameter: 10.06 m Span: 10.06 m Length: 24.84 m No. Engines: 5, J-2 Thrust (vac): 1,033 kn Burn Time: 475 s Mass Engine: 1,438 kg Diameter: 2.01 m Length: 3.38 m Chambers: 1 Chamber Pressure: 30 bar Area Ratio: 28 Oxidizer to Fuel Ratio: 5.50 Thrust to Weight Ratio: 73.18 Ch3 59

Saturn IVB Saturn V - Stage 3 Gross Mass: 119,900 kg Empty Mass: 13,300 kg Thrust (vac): 1,032 kn Isp: 421 s (vac), 200 s (SL) Burn time: 475 s Propellants: Lox/LH2 Diameter: 6.61 m Span: 6.61 m Length: 17.8 m No. Engines: 1, J-2 Thrust (vac): 1,033 kn Mass Engine: 1,438 kg Diameter: 2.01 m Length: 3.38 m Chambers: 1 Chamber Pressure: 30 bar Area Ratio: 28 Oxidizer to Fuel Ratio: 5.50 Thrust to Weight Ratio: 73.18 Ch3 60

Soviet Moon Rocket Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 N1 1964-A N1 1964-B N1 1964-V Gross Mass: 1,942,000 kg 506,000 kg 193,000 kg Empty Mass: 192,000 kg 50,000 kg 16,000 kg Thrust (vac): 49,442.4 kn 13,734 kn 1,569.6 kn Isp: 331 s, 296 s (SL) 346 s 347 s Burn time: 113 s 106 s 368 s Diameter: 10.00 m 6.80 m 4.80 m Span: 17.00 m 9.80 m 6.80 m Length: 30.00 m 20.00 m 12.00 m Propellants: LOX/Kerosene LOX/Kerosene LOX/Kerosene No Engines: 30, NK-15 8, NK-15V 4, NK-19 Status: Design 1964 Design 1964 Design 1964 Ch3 61

Inertial Upper Stage (IUS) IUS is a 2-stage, inertially guided, three axis stabilized solid rocket: Size: 17 long and 9.25 in diameter, Mass: 32,500 lb. 1 st stage (SRM and Interstage): Burn time: approx. 2 min burn from LEO to GTO, Propellant mass: 21,580 lb, Average thrust: 4,000 lbf. 2 nd stage includes: equipment support section (GNC, telemetry, command and data management, reaction control and electrical power), Solid Rocket Motor (SRM) Propellant mass: 6,000 lb Average thrust: 18,200 lbf. Ch3 62

Inertial Upper Stage (IUS) p c = 4.21 MPa = 181 I sp = 304 s t b = 101 s p c = 4.52 MPa = 64 I sp = 296 s t b = 142 s Ch3 63

Centaur RL-10B Thrust (vac): 110 kn Isp: 462 s Burn Time: 700 s Diameter: 2.13 m Area Ratio: 250 Dual-engine upper stage Centaur for Delta, Atlas, Titan rockets. Powered by two Pratt & Whitney RL10A-4-2 turbopump-fed engines burning liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen. GNC, tank pressurization, and propellant usage controls for both boost and Centaur phases are provided by the inertial navigation unit (INU) located on the forward equipment module. First Centaur burn lasts about five minutes, after which the Centaur and its payload coast in a parking orbit. During the first burn, approximately eight seconds after ignition, the payload fairing is jettisoned. Second Centaur ignition occurs approx. 30 minutes into the flight, continues for about three minutes, and is followed several minutes later by the separation of the spacecraft from Centaur. Ch3 64

Apogee Engines LEROS 1 Designed and manufactured by ARC UK, Dual mode apogee engines utilizing hydrazine and nitrogen tetroxide propellants at a thrust level of 100 lbf (445 N), Over 50 engines have been delivered since the first LEROS 1 engine was developed for the NEAR spacecraft, now orbiting asteroid (Eros 433), LEROS 1B Design improvements raised specific impulse from 315 to 320 s, LEROS 1C First flown in 1999, Specific impulse of 325 s, Highest performance apogee engine flown to date. Ch3 65

Mag-Lifter Launch assist system for a single-stage-to-orbit (SSTO) highly reusable vehicle (HRV): Magnetic levitation guideway runs up the side of a mountain and releases the vehicle at an altitude of 10,000 ft (3.0 km) to minimize air drag, Deceleration guideway at the end of the launch tube to bring the maglev accelerator-carrier to a stop for re-use, Final exit velocity can range from 600 to 1,000 mph (0.3 to 0.5 km/s), SSTO's engines can be started prior to release for checkout, Deceleration guideway is sized to bring the combined maglev accelerator-carrier/vehicle to a stop Figure courtesy Joe Howell for launch abort, NASA MSFC Launch tube can be partially evacuated (to minimize air drag in the tube) with a membrane used to seal the exit end of the tube. Ch3 66

Supergun - Project Babylon Developed for Iraqi military by Gerald Bull, presumed to be assassinated by Israeli agents in 1990. Nine tons of special supergun propellant could fire a 600 kg projectile over a range of 1,000 km, or a 2,000 kg rocket-assisted projectile. Barrel was 156 m long, with a 1 m bore. The 2,000 kg projectile would place a net payload of about 200 kg into orbit at a cost of $ 600 per kg. Ch3 67

Supergun - Project Babylon From March of 1988 until the invasion of Kuwait in 1990, Iraq contracted with Gerard Bull to build three superguns: two full sized 'Project Babylon' 1000 mm guns and one 'Baby Babylon' 350 mm prototype. Nine tonnes of special supergun propellant could fire a 600 kg projectile over a range of 1,000 kilometres, or a 2,000 kg rocket-assisted projectile. The 2,000 kg projectile would place a net payload of about 200 kg into orbit at a cost of $ 600 per kg. The 1000 mm guns were never completed. After the war UN teams destroyed the guns and gun components in Iraqi possession. LEO Payload: 200 kg. to: 180 km Orbit. at: 33.0 degrees. Payload: 600 kg. to a: 500 km altitude suborbital trajectory. Total Mass: 2,000 kg. Core Diameter: 1.00 m. Launch Price $: 0.12 million. in 1990 price dollars. Total Development Built: 25. Gerard Bull was first contracted by the Iraqi government in 1981. They desperately needed artillery to out-range the enemy in the protracted Iran -Iraq War. The association allowed Bull to yet again seek sponsorship of a space-launch supergun. Sadam Hussein liked the idea, and Project Babylon was born. Throughout the 1980's Bull's dealings with Iraq had the covert approval of Western governments, who saw Iraq as a counterweight to revolutionary Iran. In March of 1988, Bull received a contract to build two full sized 'Project Babylon' 1000 mm superguns and one 'Baby Babylon' 350 mm prototype for a total of $25 million. The project was given the cover designation 'PC-2' (Petrochemical Complex-2). British engineer Christopher Cowley was the project manager. The Project Babylon gun would have a barrel 156 meters long with a one meter bore. The launch tube would be 30 cm thick at the breech, tapering to 6.5 cm at the exit. Like the V-3 the gun would be built in segments. 26 six-meter-long sections would make up the barrel, totalling 1510 tonnes. Added to this would be four 220 tonne recoil cylinders, and the 165 tonne breech. The recoil force of the gun would be 27,000 tonnes - equivalent to a nuclear bomb and sufficient to register as a major seismic event all around the world. Nine tonnes of special supergun propellant would fire a 600 kg projectile over a range of 1,000 kilometres, or a 2,000 kg rocket-assisted projectile. The 2,000 kg projectile would place a net payload of about 200 kg into orbit at a cost of $ 600 per kg. In May of 1989 the Baby Babylon was completed at Jabal Hamrayn, 145 km north of Baghdad. The horizontally-mounted gun was 45-m long with a 350 mm barrel, and had a total mass of 102 tonnes. Following tests using lead projectiles the gun was reassembled on a hillside at a 45 degree angle. It was expected to achieve a range of 750 km. An Iraqi defector revealed later that the gun was to be used for several missions: Long-range attack using chemical, biological, or nuclear warheads. However since the weapon was fixed, it could only be fired in one direction, and like the V-3 would be easily identified and neutralised by the targeted country. For this reason the Israelis did not consider it much of a threat. As an anti-satellite weapon. It would launch a special shell in space that would explode near the target satellite, covering it with sticky material and blinding it. Production of components for the Babylon gun began in Britain with the knowledge of British and US intelligence services. These were officially 'oil pipeline segments' for the 'PC-2' petrochemical refinery. On 22 March 1990 Bull was assassinated and the project quickly unravelled. It is commonly thought that he was killed by the Israelis, concerned not so much by the supergun work but rather dynamics research Bull was doing to improve Iraqi ballistic missiles. Three weeks later British Customs seized the final eight sections of the Babylon Gun. On August 2, 1990, Iraq invaded Kuwait, precipitating the Gulf War. This ended Western covert sponsorship of Iraq. After the war UN teams destroyed the Baby Babylon 350 mm gun, components of the two Project Babylon 1000 mm guns (44 gun sections, four recoil cylinders), and one tonne of supergun propellant (the Iraqis destroyed the remaining 11 tonnes). Only seven slugs for the 350 mm gun were recovered and destroyed. Iraq claimed never to have received any design, assistance, materials or equipment for the planned rocket -assisted projectiles. At the end of September 1995 UNSCOM obtained information on an indigenous 600 mm indigenous Iraqi supergun design - evidence that the project had not died with Bull. Ch3 68

3.9 Concluding Remarks Ch3 69

Topics Equations of Motion: Gravity-free, drag-free space flight: Ideal Rocket Equation, Forces acting on vehicle: Vehicle flight in atmosphere and gravity influence. Effect of propulsion system on vehicle performance, Space Flight: Circular and elliptical orbits, Minimum energy transfer maneuvers: Hohmann transfer, Plane and altitude changes, Perturbations, Mission velocity. Flight Maneuvers, Flight Vehicles: Multistage vehicles, Launch vehicles. Ch3 70

Specific Impulse linear Vehicle Perf. vs. Prop. System Effects More energetic propellants, higher chamber pressure, larger Mass Ratio logarithmic Reduce inert mass to increase g-t Loss Reduce burning time during vertical ascent by higher thrust, Use wings to add lift. Aerodynamic Drag: Tailor forebody shape, Reduce cross-sectional area, Reduce base drag. Initial Velocity: Launch near equator, Air-launch. Optimize trajectory to increase propulsive efficiency: c u Ch3 71

Flight Maneuvers First and upper stage propulsion, Orbit injection or transferring from one orbit to another, Velocity vector adjustments and minor in-flight corrections, Reentry and landing, Rendezvous and docking, Plane change of flight trajectory, Simple rotation, De-orbiting and disposal of used/spent SC, Emergency or alternative mission. Ch3 72

3.10 SUPPLEMENT Ch3 73

Characteristic Data for Heavenly Bodies Ch3 74

Properties of s Standard Atmosphere Ch3 75

Earth s Atmosphere Ch3 76