Auburn University. Project Wall-Eagle FRR

Similar documents
Project NOVA

Auburn University Student Launch. PDR Presentation November 16, 2015

FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM OPTICS

Illinois Space Society Flight Readiness Review. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch March 30, 2016

Critical Design Review

CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW. University of South Florida Society of Aeronautics and Rocketry

Georgia Tech NASA Critical Design Review Teleconference Presented By: Georgia Tech Team ARES

CRITICAL DESIGN PRESENTATION

Presentation Outline. # Title # Title

NASA SL - NU FRONTIERS. PDR presentation to the NASA Student Launch Review Panel

Presentation Outline. # Title

Jordan High School Rocketry Team. A Roll Stabilized Video Platform and Inflatable Location Device

Flight Readiness Review

Preliminary Design Review. California State University, Long Beach USLI November 13th, 2017

NASA - USLI Presentation 1/23/2013. University of Minnesota: USLI CDR 1

NUMAV. AIAA at Northeastern University

Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Flight Readiness Review

Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Critical Design Review

Flight Readiness Review March 16, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768

NASA SL Critical Design Review

Critical Design Review Report

NASA SL Flight Readiness Review

Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Critical Design Review

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Illinois Space Society Student Launch Preliminary Design Review November 3, 2017

NASA USLI PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW. University of California, Davis SpaceED Rockets Team

UC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry Preliminary Design Review Presentation. Access Control: CalSTAR Public Access

Preliminary Design Review. Cyclone Student Launch Initiative

PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

GIT LIT NASA STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW NOVEMBER 13TH, 2017

University Student Launch Initiative

Wichita State Launch Project K.I.S.S.

Team Air Mail Preliminary Design Review

PROJECT AQUILA 211 ENGINEERING DRIVE AUBURN, AL POST LAUNCH ASSESSMENT REVIEW

NASA s Student Launch Initiative :

The University of Toledo

Illinois Space Society University of Illinois Urbana Champaign Student Launch Maxi-MAV Preliminary Design Review November 5, 2014

AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH PROJECT NOVA II. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL CDR

Overview. Mission Overview Payload and Subsystems Rocket and Subsystems Management

Statement of Work Requirements Verification Table - Addendum

Flight Readiness Review Addendum: Full-Scale Re-Flight. Roll Induction and Counter Roll NASA University Student Launch.

University of Notre Dame

NASA Student Launch W. Foothill Blvd. Glendora, CA Artemis. Deployable Rover. November 3rd, Preliminary Design Review

Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review

AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH. Project Nova. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL Post Launch Assessment Review

Critical Design Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)

Notre Dame Rocketry Team. Flight Readiness Review March 8, :00 PM CST

Preliminary Design Review

The University of Toledo

Tripoli Rocketry Association Level 3 Certification Attempt

Critical Design Review

NASA Student Launch College and University. Preliminary Design Review

Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Critical Design Review

Preliminary Design Review November 15, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768

Florida A & M University. Flight Readiness Review. 11/19/2010 Preliminary Design Review

Flight Readiness Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)

Student Launch. Enclosed: Preliminary Design Review. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken

Critical Design Review

CNY Rocket Team Challenge. Basics of Using RockSim 9 to Predict Altitude for the Central New York Rocket Team Challenge

Pre-Flight Checklist for SLIPSTICK III

ADVANCED MODEL ROCKET

Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Post Launch Assessment Review

ADVANCED MODEL ROCKET. Read And Follow All Instructions

NASA USLI Flight Readiness Review (FRR) Rensselaer Rocket Society (RRS)

Presentation 3 Vehicle Systems - Phoenix

NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY

Cornell Rocketry Team. NASA Student Launch Competition CORNELL ROCKETRY TEAM

COMPLETED MIRAGE ADVANCED MODEL ROCKET

ADVANCED MODEL ROCKET

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA FROZEN FURY CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW REPORT NASA STUDENT LAUNCH 2015

SpaceLoft XL Sub-Orbital Launch Vehicle

267 Snell Engineering Northeastern University Boston, MA 02115

NASA SL Preliminary Design Review

Rocketry Projects Conducted at the University of Cincinnati

Rocket Design. Tripoli Minnesota Gary Stroick. February 2010

USLI Flight Readiness Review

HPR Staging & Air Starting By Gary Stroick

Student Launch. Enclosed: Proposal. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken. Submission Date: September 30, 2016

EL DORADO COUNTY REGIONAL FIRE PROTECTION STANDARD

University Student Launch Initiative

USLI Critical Design Report

Tuskegee University Rocketry Club

Pre-Launch Procedures

By: Georgia Institute of Technology Team Autonomous Rocket Equipment System (A.R.E.S.) Georgia Institute of Technology North Avenue NW Atlanta GA,

Post Launch Assessment Review

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics

Critical Design Review

COMPLETED SUMO LEVEL 1 MODEL ROCKET ADVANCED HIGH POWER MODEL ROCKET ASSEMBLY AND OPERATION INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE YOU BEGIN:

To determine which number of fins will enable the Viking Model Rocket to reach the highest altitude with the largest thrust (or fastest speed.

Rover Delivery NASA University Student Launch Initiative Post-Launch Assessment Review. Charger Rocket Works.

Post Launch Assessment Review

COMPLETED ASTROBEE D ADVANCED MODEL ROCKET ADVANCED MODEL ROCKET

Madison West High School Green Team

THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON

University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review

Deployment and Flight Test of Inflatable Membrane Aeroshell using Large Scientific Balloon

Strap-on Booster Pods

University of South Florida

This Week. Next Week 4/7/15

ROYAL CANADIAN AIR CADETS PROFICIENCY LEVEL FOUR INSTRUCTIONAL GUIDE SECTION 3 EO C DESCRIBE MODEL ROCKETRY PREPARATION

NASA Student Launch Competition CORNELL ROCKETRY TEAM. Preliminary Design Review Presentation Maxi-Mav Participant

Transcription:

Auburn University Project Wall-Eagle FRR

Rocket Design

Rocket Model

Mass Estimates Booster Section Mass(lb.) Estimated Upper Section Mass(lb.) Actual Component Mass(lb.) Estimated Mass(lb.) Actual Component Structure 3.21 2.119 Structure 3.83 1.625 Ballast Tank 2.754 1.23 Payload Bay 3.07 1.5 Bulkhead 0.233.119 Avionics Bay 2.754 1.25 Engine Block 0.315.687 Recovery 0.296 1.824 Centering Ring 0.318 0.237 Nose Cone 2.13 2.5 Fins 0.907 1.199 Electronics 1.4 0.523 Recovery 2.22 1.708 Motor block 0.686 Motor 3.85 3.85 Electronics 0.1 Total 16.527 Total 13.48 9.908

Ogive Nose Cone Low Coefficient of Drag Easy to manufacture Rated highest by team trade study Commonly used in professional and hobby rocketry

Nose cone dimensions

Trapezoidal Fin Very easy to manufacture Less drag than clipped delta fins, more than elliptical fins Quicker stabilization than elliptical fins and clipped delta fins.

Fin Dimensions

Internal bays Payload Bay Ballast Tank Avionics Bay Motor Section

Stability Center of Gravity: 49.22 inches from nose tip Center of Pressure: 61.26 inches from nose tip Stability: 2.29 calibers Calculations given from OpenRocket Mass additions are expected to be added forward of CG

Stability margin before apogee 3.5 3 2.5 Stability Caliber 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Time (seconds)

Testing Material testing for: Carbon Fiber ABS Plastic Ground testing Co2 system Igniter AGSE clearance Wind Tunnel Payload bay door Parachutes

Motor Selection

Motor Selection / Altitude Prediction Initial Motor selection is the Aero K960-P R-P: Loki White, Plugged Initial thrust-to-weight ratio above required 5:1 Achieves above average thrust within ¼ second High initial thrust provides high stability off the rail Rail exit velocity is 75 ft/s

K960-P Thrust curve

Thrust-to-weight 16 14 Thrust-to-weight ratio 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 Time Seconds

Altitude Predictions At 5 Mph winds expected altitude of 2958 ft At 10 Mph winds expected altitude of 2927ft At 15 Mph winds expected altitude of 2898ft At 20 Mph winds expected altitude of 2885ft Mass can easily be removed from ballast Kinetic Energy at main deploy is 23373 lb-ft Kinetic energy upon landing is 5511 lb-ft

K960-P Altitude vs. Time Figure 1.3: Altitude vs. Time K780R-P

K960-P Motor Specifications Manufacturer Motor Designation Diameter Length Impulse Total Motor Weight Loki Research K960-P 2.13 inches 19.6 inches 1949 N-sec 3.85 lbm Propellant Weight Propellant Type Average Thrust Maximum Thrust Burn Time 2.05 lbm Loki White 225 Pounds 345 Pounds 1.95 sec

Full-Scale Flight Results 3000 2500 2000 Altitude (feet) 1500 Actual Data Modeled Data 1000 500 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Time (Seconds)

Full-Scale Successes and Failures Modeling Predictions Highly Accurate Predicted 2487, Actual - 2511 Stability Very Stable Recovery Main deploy failure, but CO2 Ejection System Overall Success

Recovery

Overview

Parachutes Drogue 22 inches Deploys at apogee Slows rocket components to safe speed for main deploy Main 99 inches Recovers booster section and avionics bay Payload 65 inches Deploys simultaneously with main Recovers payload bay and attached nose cone

Parachutes Construction Shape Semi-ellipsoidal No spill hole

Electronics Redundant altimeters Altus Metrum Telemetrum PerfectFlite StratoLogger RF trackers ZigBee mini GPS

Attachments Fasteners Nylon Slotted Pan Head Machine Screws Steel U-Bolts Quick Links

Materials Parachutes are made in-house from rip-stop nylon Shroud lines for main and payload parachutes made from ½ inch tubular nylon Shroud line for drogue parachute made from paracord Shock cords made from 1 inch tubular nylon

CO 2 Ejection System Increased safety More reliable at high altitudes Reduced risk of equipment damage

Commercial Systems Available from Rouse Tech and Tinder rocketry Viability of CO 2 systems repeatedly demonstrated in the field A single 12g cartridge is recommended for a 5 diameter rocket with sections up to 22 long.

Custom Designed System E-match ignites small black powder charge Charge pushes cartridge against spring into an opening pin Cartridge is punctured and quickly releases CO 2 Section is pressurized with enough force to separate rocket and deploy parachutes

Custom Designed System Each system contains three CO 2 cartridges Each cartridge is separately controlled

Ejection System Implementation Two ejection systems total mounted outside the avionics bay One ejection system deploys drogue parachute Second system deploys main parachute and ejects payload bay Each altimeter controls all charges on both ejection systems

Drift Calculations Section Weight (lbs.) Parachute Size (ft.) 5 mph 10 mph 15 mph 20 mph Booster section and avionics bay (main parachute) Payload bay and nose cone (payload parachute) 14.3 lbs. 8.25 ft. 1096 ft. 1228 ft. 1315 ft. 1476 ft. 4.9 lbs. 5.42 ft. 874 ft. 973 ft. 1038 ft. 1159 ft.

Autonomous Ground Support Equipment Project WALL-Eagle

Overall Final Design

AGSE Design Overview

AGSE Payload Bay and Hatch

Payload Hatch Function

Payload Access Plate and Positioning

Payload Bay Drawing

Payload Retrieval System (PRS)

Modified CrustCrawler AX-12A Smart Robotic Arm ~29 maximum reach (nearly 7-inch extension) 5 degrees of freedom Most value and capabilities for the price Completely customizable Price - $830 Infrared sensors installed Modified gripper

Robot Arm Dimensions

Robot Arm Gripper

Modified Robot Arm

IR Sensors Affixed to front of grabber, scans dark ground (grass/dirt) for light surface (payload). Arm engages payload once detected. If payload dropped, search and capture of the payload may be repeated until mission success

IR Sensors Payload Detection and Orientation

Contingency: Preprogrammed Location Use preprogrammed location of payload in case IR sensors plan doesn t work out Can choose location of payload, so static coordinates suffice Easier, but will cause launch failure if payload dropped

Launch Vehicle Elevation System (LVE)

LVE Drawing

LVE Drawing

LVE LT 2000 Winch

Elevation Sequence Measurements ensure bottom does not contact the ground Rocket attached to truss via slotted launch rail Truss will be cued to stop via pressure switch Truss will lock in vertical position once erect via winch system and blast plate Expected to take approximate 60 seconds or less

Launch Vehicle Elevation System In launch position, blast shield protects sensitive components Igniter insertion system extends into motor Rocket is then ready for inspection

Automated Charge Insertion System (ACI)

Igniter Insertion System Toothed insertion system DC electric motor drives the tooth extender into the mast Initiated with a program that is linked to the AGSE controller

Igniter Insertion System Located 6-8 inches below the base of the rocket. Main motor is protected by the blast plate Rise through a whole in the blast plate to access the rocket

Igniter Insertion System Extension of 26.6 inches Igniter pause at full extension E-match attached to tip of the insertion system is in contact with motor Inspection and arming of the rocket Countdown ensues, followed by blast off Dowel diameter will not choke motor

Master Microcontroller and Full System Operation

Master Microcontroller Single microcontroller drives all AGSE functions Simplifies design Minimizes risk Eliminates communication between multiple microcontrollers Arduino mega used

Electrical Schematic for AGSE

Launch Controller

Subsystem Connectivity All autonomous systems connected through microcontroller Only launch controller handled independently Single start, pause, and reset switches

Systems Sequence Test

Requirements and Verification AGSE Objectives System The entire system must secure the payload inside the rocket and have the rocket ready to launch in under 10 minutes. Launch Vehicle Elevation System (LVE) Launch pad will support the entire weight of the AGSE and rocket. House and protect important electronics and motors. Raise rocket from horizontal to launch position 5 degrees from the vertical. Support and guide rocket during launch to allow stable flight. Capable of lifting launch vehicle weighing 30 lbs. Payload Retrieval System (PRS) Scan and detect payload location on ground. Capture the payload. Deliver the payload to the payload bay in the launch vehicle. Return to resting position. Must be able to reacquire payload if dropped by the arm. Automated Charge Insertion System (ACI) Must move the igniter into the motor once rocket is in launch position. Must move the igniter into the motor until it reaches the top of the fuel grain. Will stop moving the igniter once it reaches top of fuel grain. Must withstand exhaust from launch vehicle. Must be reusable.

Project Management

Budget / Funding Summarized Budget Recovery $1,139.18 Subscale $344.04 Full-Scale $1,212.00 Manufacturing $1,314.77 Travel $3,339.00 Educational Outreach $2,572.00 AGSE $1,847.00 Project Management $2,880.00 Overall Total $14,647.99 System Price On the Pad (Summarized) Recovery $1,139.18 Full-Scale $1,212.00 Manufacturing $1,314.77 AGSE $1,847.00 Overall System on the Pad $5,512.95

Timeline