Statement of Work Requirements Verification Table - Addendum

Similar documents
Flight Readiness Review Addendum: Full-Scale Re-Flight. Roll Induction and Counter Roll NASA University Student Launch.

FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM OPTICS

CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW. University of South Florida Society of Aeronautics and Rocketry

Presentation Outline. # Title

Flight Readiness Review

Georgia Tech NASA Critical Design Review Teleconference Presented By: Georgia Tech Team ARES

Critical Design Review Report

Presentation Outline. # Title # Title

University Student Launch Initiative

NASA s Student Launch Initiative :

Critical Design Review

USLI Critical Design Report

Auburn University Student Launch. PDR Presentation November 16, 2015

NASA SL - NU FRONTIERS. PDR presentation to the NASA Student Launch Review Panel

Jordan High School Rocketry Team. A Roll Stabilized Video Platform and Inflatable Location Device

Auburn University. Project Wall-Eagle FRR

Illinois Space Society Flight Readiness Review. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch March 30, 2016

NASA SL Flight Readiness Review

Flight Readiness Review March 16, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768

NASA - USLI Presentation 1/23/2013. University of Minnesota: USLI CDR 1

AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH. Project Nova. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL Post Launch Assessment Review

Florida A & M University. Flight Readiness Review. 11/19/2010 Preliminary Design Review

Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Critical Design Review

NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY

University Student Launch Initiative

Team Air Mail Preliminary Design Review

Madison West High School Green Team

First Nations Launch Rocket Competition 2016

Overview. Mission Overview Payload and Subsystems Rocket and Subsystems Management

Illinois Space Society University of Illinois Urbana Champaign Student Launch Maxi-MAV Preliminary Design Review November 5, 2014

UC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry Preliminary Design Review Presentation. Access Control: CalSTAR Public Access

Critical Design Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Illinois Space Society Student Launch Preliminary Design Review November 3, 2017

University of Notre Dame

Post Launch Assessment Review

NASA SL Critical Design Review

Critical Design Review

Preliminary Design Review. California State University, Long Beach USLI November 13th, 2017

NWIC Space Center s 2017 First Nations Launch Achievements

Preliminary Design Review. Cyclone Student Launch Initiative

Flight Readiness Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)

CRITICAL DESIGN PRESENTATION

Pre-Flight Checklist for SLIPSTICK III

NASA USLI PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW. University of California, Davis SpaceED Rockets Team

Rocketry Projects Conducted at the University of Cincinnati

GIT LIT NASA STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW NOVEMBER 13TH, 2017

Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review

Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Post Launch Assessment Review

Rover Delivery NASA University Student Launch Initiative Post-Launch Assessment Review. Charger Rocket Works.

Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Flight Readiness Review

Student Launch. Enclosed: Proposal. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken. Submission Date: September 30, 2016

NASA Student Launch College and University. Preliminary Design Review

Post Launch Assessment Review

Wichita State Launch Project K.I.S.S.

Project NOVA

CNY Rocket Team Challenge. Basics of Using RockSim 9 to Predict Altitude for the Central New York Rocket Team Challenge

NASA University Student Launch Initiative (Sensor Payload) Final Design Review. Payload Name: G.A.M.B.L.S.

PROJECT AQUILA 211 ENGINEERING DRIVE AUBURN, AL POST LAUNCH ASSESSMENT REVIEW

USLI Flight Readiness Review

THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON

The University of Toledo

Wisconsin Space Grant Consortium. Collegiate Rocket Competition Handbook. Rev. 10-SEP-2018

Notre Dame Rocketry Team. Flight Readiness Review March 8, :00 PM CST

Tuskegee University Rocketry Club

Student Launch. Enclosed: Preliminary Design Review. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken

Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Critical Design Review

First Nation Launch Competition Handbook

NUMAV. AIAA at Northeastern University

Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Critical Design Review

Critical Design Review

AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH PROJECT NOVA II. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL CDR

First Nation Launch Competition Handbook

The University of Toledo

Public Missiles, Ltd.

Rocket Activity Advanced High- Power Paper Rockets

Michigan Aeronautical Science Association

Preliminary Design Review

Critical Design Review

Figure 1 - Members of CRT at Competition

University of South Alabama NASA Student Launch Proposal

SpaceLoft XL Sub-Orbital Launch Vehicle

AKRONAUTS. P o s t - L a u n c h A ss e s m e n t R e v i e w. The University of Akron College of Engineering. Akron, OH 44325

NASA USLI Flight Readiness Review (FRR) Rensselaer Rocket Society (RRS)

Preliminary Design Review November 15, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768

NASA SL Preliminary Design Review

LOW DENSITY SUPERSONIC DECELERATOR. Kolby Javinar Department of Electrical Engineering University of Hawai i at Mānoa Honolulu, HI ABSTRACT

First Revision No. 9-NFPA [ Chapter 2 ]

NASA Student Launch W. Foothill Blvd. Glendora, CA Artemis. Deployable Rover. November 3rd, Preliminary Design Review

Table of Content 1) General Information ) Summary of PDR Report ) Changes Made Since Proposal ) Safety... 8

Innovating the future of disaster relief

Turbo-Rocket. A brand new class of hybrid rocket. Rene Nardi and Eduardo Mautone

Spring Final Review. Collision Encounter Reduction for Unmanned Aerial Systems (CERUNAS) 29 April 2014

Warning! Before continuing further, please ensure that you have NOT mounted the propellers on the MultiRotor.

Electronic Deployment

UC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry NASA Student Launch Proposal Project Arktos. 432 Eshleman Hall, MC 4500 Berkeley, CA

267 Snell Engineering Northeastern University Boston, MA 02115

Rocketry, the student way

Cornell Rocketry Team. NASA Student Launch Competition CORNELL ROCKETRY TEAM

Mercury VTOL suas Testing and Measurement Plan

This Week. Next Week 4/7/15

Transcription:

Statement of Work Requirements Verification Table - Addendum Vehicle Requirements Requirement Success Criteria Verification 1.1 No specific design requirement exists for the altitude. The altitude is a function of obtaining supersonic flight for the supersonic payloads 1.1.1. Obtaining the predicted altitude of 15,800ft. 1.1.2. The Range Safety Officer approves the altitude by the CDR 1.2 The vehicle shall use a COTS barometric altimeter for recording official altitude. 1.2.1 Altimeter successfully recovered and presented to NASA official while still beeping 1.2.2 The vehicle shall have additional altimeters to control vehicle electronics and payload experiments Vehicle attains supersonic flight while remaining under maximum allowable altitude of 20,000 ft. AGL Record post-flight altimeter to determine max altitude attained. Predicted altitude is below the specified maximum. Both altimeters will be PerfectFlite StratoLoggers Successful recovery of Prometheus following competition launch. Two altimeters will be used to successfully trigger the recovery system. The competition altimeter and a redundant device. Designate official altimeter ahead of time. See requirement 1.2.1 1.2.2.1 Present altimeter to be marked as official altimeter. 1.2.2.2 Altimeter successfully recovered and presented to NASA official while still beeping 1.2.2.3 Silence all other altimeters in All altimeters will have a the rocket. dedicated power source 1.2.3 See Sub Requirements See Sub Requirements 1.2.3.1 The official altimeter is See requirement 1.2.1 presented to the RSO undamaged while still reporting an altitude 1.2.3.2 The team will report to the RSO in a timely manner after recovery of the vehicle Team will develop and follow specified launch day procedures. 1.2.3.3 Current predictions do not Simulations in Rocksim

exceed 16,000 feet AGL 1.2.3.4 CRW current plans to have a team in Utah for the competition flight of Prometheus 1.3 Rocket will be designed to land slow enough so no hardware is damaged 1.4 Payloads and recover system will be simple in design and allow the rocket to be assembled in 2 hours from waiver opening. 1.5 Vehicle shall remain in launch configuration for at least one hour. 1.6 The vehicle shall be able to be launched by a 12V ignition system that will be provided 1.7 Vehicle shall not require any external circuitry to initiate launch 1.8 The vehicle shall use a COTS motor propulsion system using APCP 1.9 Prometheus will not have a pressure vessel. predict max altitude of 15,800 ft. AGL Travel arrangements are being made to transport a launch team, at minimum. Simulations and testing of recovery system design for proper function and to minimize impact energy. Ground testing of payload and recovery system designs to ensure quick assembly. Launch procedures detailing all steps in assembly. Batteries have been selected so that individual systems remain functional for 1.75 hours Motors selected for subscale and full scale flights are commercially available and can be ignited using a 12V system The ignition system provided by NASA will be the only circuitry external to the vehicle The selected motor will be a CTI M4770- Vmax Prometheus will not have a pressure vessel. 1.10 See Sub Requirements See Sub Requirements 1.10.1 The vehicle and recovery system will be flown and operate correctly during a full-scale flight. The rocket will be visually inspected and flight data will be used to confirm recover system results. 1.10.2 See Sub Requirements See Sub Requirements 1.10.2.1 See Sub Requirements See Sub Requirements 1.10.2.1.1 If all payloads are not prepared Mass simulators will be mass simulators will be placed in based on latest know

the approximate location as the unfinished payload. 1.10.2.2 Prometheus contains no external surface changing payloads or energy management systems 1.10.3 A full-scale flight with a full-scale or near full-scale motor will be flown to validate design and test payloads. 1.10.4 A full-scale flight with complete ballast shall be flown before the FRR. 1.10.5 After competition of a full-scale flight the system will be completely designed and not require a redesign. expected payload mass Prometheus contains no external surface changing payloads or energy management systems The full-scale flight will validate launch calculations, payload design, vehicle design, and recovery system design. A full-scale flight with all payloads in flight ready configuration or with simulated weight will be flown and safely recovered. Should anything need to be changed, concurrence must be obtained from the Range Safety Officer (RSO) priory to design change.

Recovery System Requirements Requirement Success Criteria Verification 2.1 Use a dual deploy system that can bring the rocket down fast enough to keep drift under 5000ft for a 20 mph wind. Test recovery system during full-scale to validate parachute calculations. Use actual drift to extrapolate 2.2 A completely custom made parachute designed and manufactured by the UAH Charger Rocket Works team 2.3 The highest landing energy will belong to the large body of the rocket and will be maintained near the current prediction of 33 ft.*lb 2.4 The recovery system circuit will be designed to be completely self-contained and isolated from the payload circuits. 2.5 Two commercial altimeters will provide redundancy to insure recovery system deployment. Both the drogue and main will have redundant altimeters. 2.6 Dual arming switches to insure both altimeters are armed and keep both systems separate from each other. 2.7 Each altimeter will have a dedicated power supply to completely isolate each recovery system and prevent a single failure point. 2.8 Pull pins will be used and the system will be designed to be on once the pins are removed. 2.9 Shear pins will keep the single deploy point (Nosecone) attached. The shear pins will be removable to access the drift at 20 mph. No parachutes will be purchased for the full-scale or final rocket. Verify landing energy calculations from full-scale launch accelerometers at landing. The circuits will be tested in ground tests and during full-scale launch to validate independence. Fly two altimeters for the full-scale flight to verify both systems deploy during flight. Full-scale flight will insure that both altimeters can be accessed from outside the rocket from a separate arming switch. Will be Tested during fullscale flight to insure that each altimeter is powered correctly from their independent batteries. Full-scale test will insure the pull pins activate both altimeters and that the altimeters remain on. The shear pins will be checked to insure they can be removed before launch and they will be tested in

recovery system. shearing during the fullscale launch and ground tests. 2.10 See Sub Requirements See Sub Requirements 2.10.1 The rocket will return tethered together. The rocket will have GPS broadcasting in real time during the descent and have a dog tracker as a backup solution. The GPS will be tested during the full-scale launch and tested during ground test. The dog tracker will be tested during ground test and full-scale. 2.10.2 The tracking system will be functional and integrated with the Landing Hazard Detection System. The tracking system will be tested during full-scale flight to insure correct integration with landing hazard detection system. 2.11 See Sub Requirements See Sub Requirements 2.11.1 The recovery system will be located in a different compartment from the LHDS, the only broadcasting system. 2.11.2 No onboard devices will be transmitting until the recovery system has already deployed. 2.11.3 The recovery system will be separated from energy producing payloads and the energy producing payload will reside in a faraday cage. 2.11.4 No devices will interfere with the operation of the recovery system electronics through any means. Tested during full-scale flight to insure radio does not power on until clear of the rocket. Tested during full-scale flight to insure radio does not power on until clear of the rocket. Ground tests will insure recovery system is properly isolated from energy producing payloads and tested during full-scale flight. Several sub-scale tests, ground tests, and full-scale test will insure the recovery system remains un affected by other payloads.

Payload Requirements Requirement Success Criteria Verification 3.1 See Sub Requirements See Sub Requirements 3.1.1 Landing Hazard Detection System will include a COTS camera to scan the ground during descent for hazards and use one of three different methods or a combination of them to detect hazards. Test Landing Hazard Detection System during full-scale flight and testing using google images and hazards on a wall. 3.1.2 Use a Beaglebone to provide sufficient processing to analyze the image in real time by the computer on the rocket. 3.1.3 The presence of hazards or lack thereof will be transmitted back to a ground station in real time using a COTS radio solution connected to the Beaglebone. 3.2 Fly additional payloads 3.2.1.2 and 3.2.2.4 3.3 Design payload to have easily changeable batteries and remain undamaged on landing so the system can be easily reflown without requiring repairs. 3.4 3.4 and sub requirements are not applicable The Beaglebone White has a Sitara AM335x Cortex A8 ARM processor, and will be tested before the competition flight to ensure proper data transmission. Tests of full scale flight hardware will be conducted on the ground and on the full scale test flight within acceptable limitations of the hardware and expected flight conditions Ensure that each payload meets its separate payload requirements from the CDR Ensure that payload is recovered from full-scale launch and is completely intact and ready to be reflown. 3.4 and sub requirements are not applicable

General Requirements Requirement Success Criteria Verification 4.1 Launch and safety checklist made and tested for full-scale launch. Launch checklist will be tested and run through during full-scale launch to 4.2 A successful mission flown and built completely by students at Charger Rocket Works of University of Alabama in Huntsville 4.3 Project plan will contain details concerning all aspects of the project and lay out a path forward till the project s completion. 4.4 Mentor will be identified and be certified at the appropriate level by full-scale launch. 4.5 All team members, instructors, and mentors will be identified to NASA including Foreign nationals 4.6 Foreign Nationals will be identified by PDR and informed of potential separation during launch week activities 4.7 Follow all generally accepted safety procedures as well as any additional safety procedures that are imposed by the RSO at any local club launches. 4.8 Complete an outreach packet that is modular in nature and easily adaptable to different age groups to reach as many students as possible. Lay groundwork for future teams to build upon outreach. Reach at least 200 students at least half of those being middle schools. insure completeness. Although external sources shall be used for advice, all construction, design work, and writing will be performed by students. A final project binder containing purchases, timeline, organization chart, outreach details, and more shall be made before the flight day. Mentor identified by PDR. Achieved required level. Completed. List submitted before CDR. Completed. List submitted before PDR. Check with RSO before each launch and insure they approved of the flight. Request feedback from outreach students and educators to evaluate worth of outreach program and improve. Put outreach slides and plans on flash drive and give to instructor to present to next class. 4.9 A new custom hand crafted Use online HTML verifiers

HTML5 website will be designed for the Charger Rocket Works team. This will be used to spread information concerning the team and its efforts in both outreach and project. Allow easy access to all documentation made by the team. Website should be complete by Launch Day with only flight results left to post. 4.9.1 Post documents to website in an easily accessible manner. Email NASA when documents are posted. to insure HTML5 compliance and test document download to insure they work correctly. Check website and insure completeness by launch day. PDR: Completed CDR: Completed FRR: April 18 th 8:00am