Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions

Similar documents
Green Line LRT: Beltline Segment Update April 19, 2017

Welcome. Green Line in Your Community

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

Calgary Transit and the Calgary Transportation Plan Chris Jordan, M.Sc., P.Eng. Coordinator, Strategic Transit Planning, Calgary Transit

THE WAY WE MOVE LRT FOR EVERYONE

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Welcome The City has undertaken a naming exercise for the existing and future LRT lines. The SE to West LRT, as the project has been called to date,

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

Transportation Infrastructure Investment Program moving

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan

What We Heard Report - Metro Line NW LRT

Scarborough Transit Planning

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

DOWNTOWN LRT FEASIBILITY STUDY

Ottawa LRT Stage 2. McKellar Park Information Session

2.1 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Expand regional rapid transit networks STRATEGIC DIRECTION

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Rapid Transit Implementation Working Group #4 February 9, 2017

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN THE TOWN OF NEWMARKET

West Broadway Reconstruction/LRT Design. March 19, 2015

Strategic Plan

West LRT. Alignment Update and Costing Report May Calgary Transit Transportation Planning Clifton ND Lea Consultants

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan

WELCOME. North Central LRT Open Houses. June 11, Ascension of Our Lord School June 12, Winston Heights June 13, Thorncliffe Community Hall

Draft Results and Open House

1 Downtown LRT Connector: Draft Concept

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

Needs and Community Characteristics

PROJECT BACKGROUND 3

Executive Summary. Phase 2 Evaluation Report. Introduction

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

Recommended Vision for the Downtown Rapid Transit Network

MEDIA RELEASE. June 16, 2008 For Immediate Release

BIRMINGHAM CONNECTED Anne Shaw Tuesday 20 January 2015

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN WATERLOO REGION

Federal Way Link Extension

Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project

Green Line Long-Term Investments

Mississauga Transit 2009 Budget

Attachment 5. High Speed Transit Planning Study REPORT SUMMARY. Prepared by: City of Edmonton Transportation Planning Branch. Stantec Consulting Ltd.

Pomona Rotary December 19, 2017

Tempe Streetcar. March 2, 2016

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

San Rafael Transit Center. Update. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District Transportation Committee of the Board of Directors

Transit Vehicle (Trolley) Technology Review

FasTracks News. RTD s Eagle P3 Transit Project Nears Halfway Mark to Opening Day EP3 will add three commuter rail lines to metro area in 2016

MARTA s blueprint for the future. COFFEE AND CONVERSATION Kyle Keahey, More MARTA Atlanta Dec. 5, 2018

Prince George CNG Operations and Maintenance Facility Project BC Transit

Converting BRT to LRT in the Nation s Capital Ottawa, Canada. John Manconi City of Ottawa Ottawa, Canada

On June 11, 2012, the Park Board approved the installation of three electric vehicle charging stations along Beach Avenue.

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

2.4 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Support the revitalization of urban cores STRATEGIC DIRECTION

Proposed Program of Interrelated Projects

Policy Advisory Committee Meeting November 13, 2013

An Asset Management Plan for Transit And Access Transit Fleet

Developing Toronto s Transit Network Plan to 2031

Attachment 5 Eglinton West LRT Planning and Technical Update

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

Welcome. The purpose of today s session is to:

Draft Marrickville Car Share Policy 2014

Mr. Vince Mauceri General Manager Transportation Operations and Technology

TRAIN, BUS & TRANSIT

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

Project Scoping Report Appendix B Project Web Site. APPENDIX B Project Web Site

Scarborough Subway Extension. Stakeholder Advisory Meeting February 28, 2017

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: August 30, SUBJECT: Scarborough Rt Strategic Plan

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

Draft Results and Recommendations

The Jack A. Markell Trail Delaware s Bicycle Highway New England Bike- Walk Summit

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Location Concept Plan Amendment Recommendation Approved 2011 Concept Plan

JCP&L Verbatim Response to Middletown Township s Questions

Appendix G: Rapid Transit Technology Backgrounder July 2017

NEW HAVEN HARTFORD SPRINGFIELD RAIL PROGRAM

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN EAST GWILLIMBURY

Tunney s Pasture Station Bus Loop and Lay-up Area Design

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Policy Advisory Committee Meeting February 12, 2014

ACT Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit Planning Innovations in Practice Session 6B Tuesday November 23, 2010

TRANSFORMING THE WAY OUR REGION MOVES

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Pace Bus Depot Location Analysis

WOLVERINE TO BHP JANSEN NEW TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT FALL 2017

MOBILITY AND ACCESSIBILITY IN OUR COMMUNITY

Developing Toronto s Transit Network Plan to Public Information Meeting June 21, 2016

Snelling Bus Rapid Transit. May 13, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1

4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES

Public Advisory Committee Meeting #3. February 11, 2014

2013/2014 Strategic Priorities Fund Application Overview

TransLink/MoTI SURREY RAPID TRANSIT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS PHASE 2 EVALUATION

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

SOUTHERN GATEWAY. Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee 11 May 2015

JTA S MOBILITY CORRIDORS. Improving System Performance Through Urban Design

Transcription:

Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions June 2017 Quick Facts Administration has evaluated several alignment options that would connect the Green Line in the Beltline to Victoria Park and Inglewood/Ramsay station. No single option serves all stakeholders and meets all program objectives without trade-offs, but Administration believes one option presents the best balance against all evaluation criteria. Option 4: Transition to 10 Avenue S.E. will be recommended to the Standing Policy Committee on Transportation and Transit and, subsequently, to City Council. Transition to 10 Avenue S.E. limits the impact to the community of Ramsay and addresses concerns regarding traffic access and circulation in Victoria Park. The recommended option also supports the long-term vision for the future Rivers District Master Plan. The recommended alignment requires land acquisition in the form of partial (only a part of the property is required), full (all of the property is required), and underground strata (property is required underground for the tunnel). The exact land requirements are still under review. Once the alignment is approved by Council, Administration will advance design and arrange to meet one-on-one with all impacted property owners. Land acquisition is a risk for any project. If The City cannot acquire the required land, Administration will re-evaluate the remaining alignment options and determine the best course of action. City Council is ultimately responsible for approving the alignment. Option #4: Transition 10 Avenue S.E. What Happens Next? Administration will recommend Option 4: Transition to 10 Avenue S to the Standing Policy Committee on Transportation and Transit on June 21, 2017, and then to City Council on June 26, 2017 1

Introduction Since early 2016, Administration has been evaluating how best to connect the Beltline communities to the future Inglewood/Ramsay station. In December, 2016, City Council approved 12 Avenue S as the preferred corridor for the Green Line. Administration then turned their attention to the short but complex stretch in Victoria Park that would complete the connection of the north and southeast segments of the Green Line. The stretch between MacLeod Trail S.E. and the Inglewood/Ramsay station constrained the design of the Green Line due to several factors: Victoria Park redevelopment -Canada Municipal Land Corporation (CMLC) is currently developing its Rivers District Masterplan, a new vision for the area that includes the Stampede grounds, the Saddledome, and a future culture and entertainment district. The City of Calgary is working with CMLC to support the area transportation network once the Rivers District Masterplan is built out to best serve Calgarians, whether you travel by foot, bike, transit or car. Victoria Park Transit Centre The Victoria Park Transit Centre (VPTC) sits just west of the Elbow River, between CP Railway and 12 Avenues S. It is an active transit centre, open 24/7, with one third of the city s daily bus fleet operating out of the facility. The centre can be relocated in the future but no commitments have been made in terms of funding or timelines. The estimated cost of a replacement facility, not including remediation of the lands in Victoria Park, is approximately $300 million. The City does not currently have the funds to relocate the centre, so Administration has been exploring Green Line alignment options that would not require immediate relocation of the Transit Centre. It is Administration s responsibility to explore all technically possible alignment options to understand potential issues and opportunities, and to provide City Council with the information and context they need to make an alignment decision. 2

The Four Short-listed Options Option 1 North of the Victoria Park Transit Centre (VPTC) The team began by exploring a surface alignment on 12 Avenue S that would turn north and skirt around the Victoria Park Transit Centre (VPTC), as shown below. This option: Would connect to the approved southeast alignment of the Green Line Would result in slower travel times and costly wear and tear on LRT vehicles in the long-term due to the alignment s sharp turn at the VPTC. Would impede bus operations out of the VPTC, which would increase operating costs. Option 2 MacDonald Avenue In early March, the team began exploring an alternative alignment option that would connect the Beltline to the Inglewood/Ramsay station via MacDonald Avenue S.E., as shown below. This alignment option: Would have faster travel times for transit customers than Option 1 Would not produce the same wear on LRT vehicles as Option 1 Would reduce impact to bus operations at VPTC because the main entrance/exit is not shared with LRT Is not supported by the community due to the required property acquisition, the potential impact to access and circulation in the community, and the perceived community division created by the LRT tracks 3

Option 3 -The Staged Option This would allow the Green Line to skirt north of the Transit Centre until the Centre is re-located, at which time the Green Line tracks would be re-aligned and a station would be built on the former Transit Centre lands, as shown below. Early evaluation suggests that this option: Could provide some opportunity to adapt to future conditions in Victoria Park once the Transit Centre is relocated and the area becomes more developed. Does not include a station in the first stage. The station would be added as part of the track realignment and relocation of the Transit Centre. Does not align with initial concepts for the future vision of Victoria Park. Could result in higher costs in the longterm related to modifying the infrastructure in the future. Short Term Long Term Option 4 - Transition to 10 Avenue S Option RECOMMENDED ALIGNMENT The Transition to 10 Avenue S Option would see the line jog north underground from the Centre Street station on 12 Avenue S to 10 Avenue S, where it would come to surface and run parallel to the south side of the CP tracks until it reaches the Inglewood/Ramsay station, as shown below. This option has: Minimal impact to the existing area traffic network Faster travel times for the LRT Minimal impact to the Victoria Park Transit Centre Minimal disruption to existing residential communities Aligns with initial concept for the future vision of Victoria Park Would likely have to business stakeholders in the area Would likely require property not previously contemplated 4

The team explored all four options, which included evaluating technical feasibility, constructability, costs, property, community readiness, bus and LRT transit operations, stakeholder sentiment, and development potential. How do the four options compare? Metric Option 1: North of Victoria Park Transit Centre Option 2: MacDonald Avenue Option 3: Staged Around Victoria Park Transit Centre Near-term Long-term Option 4: Transition to 10 Avenue S Estimated LRT Run Time Slowest (8.5 Fast (7.0 Fast (6.5 Medium (8.0 Fast (7.0 Community Impacts Minimal to existing communities Highest to existing communities Minimal to existing communities Minimal impact to existing communities Some impact to Victoria Park community Development Impacts Places portal adjacent to development site Places portal adjacent to development site No station in Victoria Park Complicates future development of Transit Centre lands Complicates development above tunnel Capital Cost Consideration $550 million $600 million $540 million Additional $20 million for track reconstruction and station. $600 million Property Cost Consideration Property costs will be a major differentiator between individual options. Costs are determined through negotiated land agreements. Property acquisition remains a high risk for the project. Stakeholder Sentiment Concern about portal location & 12 Ave S traffic access and circulation Concern about community impact, portal location & 12 Ave S traffic access and circulation Concern about portal location & 12 Ave S traffic access and circulation Concern about portal location & 12 Ave S traffic access and circulation Minimizes to community, traffic access and circulation Operational Considerations Significant to bus & LRT operations Minimal operational Impacts to Transit Centre operations & LRT operations Minimal operational No impact to Transit Centre & LRT operations 5

Who is ultimately responsible for approving the alignment? City Council is responsible for approving the alignment recommended by Administration. Council can approve the recommendation or defer the decision until a future date and direct Administration to provide further analysis. What are The City s priorities in designing this LRT line? The Green Line is more than just a transit service that will move people from point A to point B. It s a project that will respond to growth demands, connect people with places and programs, and will make Calgary a more attractive, accessible and vibrant city. Planning the Green Line requires The City to balance a number of priorities including: Operational requirements for transit (ie. providing a service that operates efficiently and sustainably) The needs of local stakeholders (ie. residents, businesses, community hubs, and attractions) The need to design and operate the right LRT for all Calgarians, for today and for the next 100 years Administration will recommend an alignment to City Council in June 2017 based on: Return on investment the option recommended will offer the best value and return on investment to the city and taxpayers. This includes quantifying the impact to transit operations and/or the full cost of relocating of the VPTC. Community implications identifying and understanding the and opportunities of each option for the communities of Beltline, Ramsay and Victoria Park. Vision for Calgary s future the recommended option needs to be right for Calgary today, and for Calgary for the next 100 years. This means looking at how the Green Line will serve substantial population growth, and how it will support and integrate with new development and existing communities along the length of the line. How does The City justify the benefits and of a given alignment? Choosing the alignment for the largest capital infrastructure project in The City s history requires Administration and Council to make a series of big, complex decisions. No single alignment option, at any point along the LRT line, can serve all stakeholders and meet all objectives without impact. It is the responsibility of Administration and Council to evaluate, understand and weigh the trade-offs of each option. 6

In working towards alignment recommendations, the project team considered: Technical feasibility Constructability Costs Property Community readiness Connectivity Bus and LRT transit operations Stakeholder sentiment Development potential All criteria were evaluated in terms of contributing to the objectives of delivering a sustainable system that will serve the city as it grows and provide the best value for Calgarians. How and why was 12 Avenue S selected as the recommended Beltline corridor? Several avenues were evaluated in 2016 as part of the Multiple Accounts Evaluation (MAE) for the Beltline segment of the Green Line. There are many technically feasible options, but technical feasibility is only one of seven criteria to be considered. The MAE was completed with the following assumptions and/or considerations in mind: Area evaluated included 2 Street SW to 6 Street SE south of the CP tracks All options would connect to the tunnel in Centre City under the CP tracks The four options explored during the Beltline MAE were: 10 Avenue S Surface 10 Avenue S Tunnel + Surface 12 Avenue S Surface 12 Avenue S Tunnel + Surface You can see the more detailed overview of the Beltline MAE on our web page, and we have summarized the results below. Together, the two options on the 12 Avenue S corridor ranked highest in five of seven categories, and the 12 Avenue S Surface option tied for highest ranking in Sustainable Environment with the two 10 Avenue S options. 7

10 Avenue S Tunnel + Surface scored highest overall in the category of Feasibility & Deliverability All options but 12 Avenue S Tunnel + Surface tied for score in the category of Sustainable Environment 12 Avenue S Surface option scored highest overall in two of the remaining five categories: Community Well-Being and Financial Capacity 12 Avenue S Tunnel + Surface option scored highest overall in the remainder of the options: Transportation, Urban & Neighbourhood Development, and Stakeholders Why were the MacDonald Avenue S.E. option, the Staged Option, and the Transition to 10 Avenue S Option opened for consideration? It is Administration s responsibility to explore all technically possible alignment options before making a recommendation to City Council on the best way to connect the Beltline to the Inglewood/Ramsay station. We began by exploring the VPTC option, which would see the LRT come to surface on 12 Avenue S after 4 Street S.E. and turn north to skirt around the Transit Centre before running parallel to the CP tracks until it reaches the Inglewood/Ramsay station. The VPTC option is technically feasible, but we have discovered that this alignment would impede bus operations, result in slower travel times for buses and the LRT, and produce higher annual maintenance costs for the LRT and higher operating costs for bus service. The MacDonald Avenue S.E. option, the staged option and the Transition to 10 Avenue S.E. Option were investigated to understand how these options compare. These options were considered and analyzed to understand the potential issues and opportunities, and to provide City Council with the information and context they need to make an alignment decision. How would each of the options impact area transportation access and circulation? The transportation network in Victoria Park will be different than what we see today. CMLC s Rivers District Masterplan will result in new development and more people living, working and playing in the area. The future culture and entertainment district and the Green Line will both bring large scale changes to the area. The Green Line LRT needs to serve this growth and support transportation choices in the area. Understanding the to the transportation network will be part of the ongoing evaluation. 8

How fast will the train travel? Where the Green Line runs in-street (such as on Centre Street N), the train would not exceed the posted speed limit. Where the Green Line is fenced in or operates in a tunnel, the train would not exceed 80 kilometres per hour. How much noise will the train make? There will be noise and vibration associated with the Green Line. The noise produced by the Green Line will depend on the type of vehicle that is purchased, how the vehicles are built, and how the track itself is constructed. You might have noticed a difference in noise and vibration between our older train vehicles and the newer vehicles. Individuals experience noise and vibration differently. What will The City do to ensure safety for communities in close proximity to the train? Safety is a top priority for The City of Calgary, and Calgary Transit always follows industry best practice with regard to safety. Additional design and operational considerations will determine safety measures over the coming months. 9