Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement

Similar documents
2015 AER Survey of Albertans and Stakeholders. Executive Summary

Inactive Well Compliance Program (IWCP)

2018 AER Social Research Report

Joint Operating Procedures for First Nations Consultation on Energy Resource Activities

Frequently Asked Questions

Avon Products, Inc. Particulars. RSPO Annual Communications of Progress Particulars Form. About Your Organisation. 1.1 Name of your organization

What We Heard Report - Metro Line NW LRT

Urban Construction Initiative Certification Program Update

REPORT TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS TRANSIT FLEET UPDATE

Welcome. Green Line in Your Community

Decision on Merced Irrigation District Transition Agreement

Alberta Electric System Operator Saleski Transmission Project Needs Identification Document

Performance and Development Review Scheme

The Midas Touch Guide for Communication Management, Research and Training/ Education Divisions Page 2

Our proposal is to replace the existing pipeline with a new pipeline, to ensure the continued safe transportation of refined petroleum products.

CALL FOR APPLICATIONS FOR THE SELECTION OF MEMBERS OF THE TACHOGRAPH FORUM

Examinations of Working Places in Metal and Nonmetal Mines. AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration, Labor.

Natural Gas for Transportation Codes & Standards Issues

2016 ANNUAL CONSERVATION REPORT

University of Alberta

The National Association of State Motorcycle Safety Administrators (SMSA) Strategic Plan

Draft Agenda. Item Subject Responsible Time. 4. GAS INFORMATION SERVICES PROJECT IMO 10 min. 5. OPTIONS FOR GAS BULLETIN BOARD SYSTEM IMO 15 min

Rhode Island Division of Public Utilities and Carriers & Office of Energy Resources. Power Sector Transformation

2016 JAPANESE AMERICAN LEADERSHIP DELEGATION TO JAPAN 16TH DELEGATION March 5 12, 2016

SPEED LIMIT CHANGES - RURAL ROADS OFF STATE HIGHWAY 58 AND COROGLEN RISE (OFF AIRLIE ROAD)

Final Report. LED Streetlights Market Assessment Study

Merger of the generator interconnection processes of Valley Electric and the ISO;

2011 ANNUAL COMMITMENTS

2016 Waste and Recycling Program Frequently Asked Questions

Recharge Kick-off Meeting Recharge Activity Review Process for

Declaration naming Richard J. Nixon and Dale Brand under section 106 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

To Our Business Partners

IMPACT OF THE BUS LOCATION SYSTEM ON BUS USAGE. - Morioka City -

EVSE Permitting and Inspection Best Practices

Updates. Pat Reiten President and CEO, PacifiCorp Transmission

Decision Blaze Energy Ltd. Application for an Exemption under Section 24 of the Hydro and Electric Energy Act.

Commitment to Innovation Leads Fairchild International to Launch New AC Scoop Powered by Baldor Products

Northeast Autonomous and Connected Vehicle Summit

Final Administrative Decision

GRADUATED LICENSING. KITCHEN TABLE DISCUSSION GUIDE Have your say on Your PLates reforms

2014/15 Annual Report Executive Summary

FAF & Private Company Issues

New Franchise Agreement: Recyclables, Organics, and Waste. Town of Truckee Town Council Meeting July 25, 2017

Decision D ATCO Electric Ltd. Decommissioning of Transmission Line 6L82

Item No Halifax Regional Council June 21, 2016

Ambient PM 10 Monitoring Sechelt, B.C Update

MAR1011. West Birmingham Bus Network Review March 2010

Overview of ISO 9001 and ISO 14001

Brexit Update for US Industry Neil Williams 18 October 2018

Feasibility of Establishing an E85 Fuelling Station in Oshawa

Green Line LRT: Beltline Segment Update April 19, 2017

Explaining AER Setbacks

Key Findings General Public and Traffic Police Surveys

Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions

Strategy for Promoting Centers of Excellence (CoE) Activities

Dear New Clean Cities Stakeholder:

Category V. Criterion 5H: Hazardous Materials (Hazmat)

Taxis and Accessible Services Division Medallion Reform Background May 1, 2018

Environmental Management Systems and ISO Certification. MD-DC Utilities Association Environmental Conference Dan Norden October 10, 2012

Submission to the IESO re: RDGI Fund Virtual Net Metering Investigation Topic

Late Starter. Tuesday, November 6, 2018

ELECTRIC VEHICLE, PLUG-IN HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE, ELECTRIC VEHICLE SUPPLY EQUIPMENT, AND ELECTRIC BIKE GROUP DISCOUNT PROGRAM

Solar-Wind Specific Request for Proposals

CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS

International Palm Oil Purchasing Policy

ALLEGATIONS RELATED TO LABOUR AND HUMAN RIGHTS AT INDOAGRI

Southern California Edison Rule 21 Storage Charging Interconnection Load Process Guide. Version 1.1

PROMOTING THE UPTAKE OF ELECTRIC AND OTHER LOW EMISSION VEHICLES

Modernising the Great Western railway

A Guide to the medium General Service. BC Hydro Last Updated: February 24, 2012

Economic and Social Council

Addressing ambiguity in how electricity industry legislation applies to secondary networks

Bohn to Kettle River Transmission Project

St. Catharines Transit Commission Accessibility Plan. St. Catharines Transit Commission Accessibility Plan

Cost Reflective Tariffs

Colgate-Palmolive Company

Solidaridad. Particulars. RSPO Annual Communications of Progress Particulars Form Submit date: 16-Jul :34 GMT Page 1/1

ATAS TAXIS. Goals. Responsibilities. Accomplishments: What got done?

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Solar and Smart Meter Update. 1 April 2014 to 30 June 2014 Released July 2014

AEP Utilities Presentation

Fleet Safety Initiative Status Summary

NATIONAL WORKSHOP FOR PROMOTION OF LOW SULPHUR FUELS IN BOTSWANA, MARCH 2016.

STRATEGIC BUSINESS PLAN QUARTERLY KPI REPORT FOR: FISCAL YEAR 2015 THROUGH QUARTER 4 (JULY 2014 THROUGH JUNE 2015)

Transit Vehicle (Trolley) Technology Review

REPORT Meeting Date: February 7,2013 Waste Management Committee

Tucson Regional Clean Cities Coalition. University of Arizona, Gary Woodard Colleen Crowninshield, Program Manager

Operational Profile 1.1 What are the main activities of your organization? Biodiversity protection, conservation and sustainable use of natural resour

PROPOSED HEAVY-DUTY VEHICLE AND ENGINE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION REGULATIONS UNDER CEPA, 1999

Improving Accessibility of Regional Bus Stops and Pathways

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION. Quality of petrol and diesel fuel used for road transport in the European Union

Sasol is a global integrated chemicals and energy company. Through our talented people, we use selected technologies to safely and sustainably

Kettle River Transmission Project

Commissioning Director for Environment. Officer Contact Details Lisa Wright; Summary

10/4/2016. October 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Corporate Engagement in Wetlands Restoration

Motorcycle Safety Program Assessments

Part 3 Agreement Programs for 2017 and Greenhouse Gas Reduction (Renewable and Low Carbon Fuel Requirements) Act

Zorik Pirveysian, Air Quality Policy and Management Division Manager Policy and Planning Department

Transcription:

Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement Peace River October 17, 2014

Stakeholder Engagement: The Panel recognizes that although significant stakeholder engagement initiatives have occurred, these efforts were not seen by area residents as being successful in resolving their concerns. The Panel recognized that there may be additional opportunities for better information sharing and improved communications among stakeholders and the Panel recommends that the AER support these initiatives. 2014 ABAER 005 (March 31, 2014) Odours and emissions issues in the Peace River area are complex. They were first brought to the Energy Resources Conservation Board s (ERCB s) attention in 2010. It was acknowledged that there were odour issues, but they did not stem from hydrogen sulphide (H 2 S) or sulphur dioxide (S0 2 ). The ERCB s regulations only prevented companies from venting sour gas, and those regulations set air quality standards according to Alberta Ambient Air Quality Objectives. To complicate matters, the technology used in Peace River was also used in other parts of Alberta, but it was not impacting local residents in other areas of the province in the same way. In the following four years, a variety of working groups were formed in order to bring issues to the table and seek solutions. Through the commitment and hard work of these groups, progress was made to capture vented gas in the field, but the residents were still feeling impacted by the development and were requesting further regulatory intervention. The Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) was proclaimed in June 2013. It acquired jurisdiction over the Public Lands Act, the Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act, the Water Act, and Part 8 of the Mines and Minerals Act. With these additional responsibilities, the newly formed AER called for a formal proceeding in Peace River. Stakeholders were invited to participate and put their facts and views on the public record. After hearing from all the stakeholders, an AER panel published formal recommendations. It provided support and direction for the regulatory change required to address the issues in the Peace River area. The proceeding was an intense and challenging process for everyone involved. A New Beginning On March 31, the AER Panel released the Report of Recommendations on Odours and Emissions in the Peace River Area. Recognizing the fatigue many residents felt from years of seeking solutions, as well as from the proceeding itself, the AER Stakeholder and Government Relations division s first goal was to ensure stakeholders knew what action the AER was taking to implement the recommendations. To implement the recommendations, industry was required to make operational changes to meet tight deadlines for capturing produced gas in Three Creeks and Reno, Alberta Energy Regulator- Evaluating Engagement in Peace River 1

Alberta Energy Regulator submit plans for capturing produced gas in the Seal and Walrus areas, and submit additional plans for conserving produced gas within the Peace River area. By October 31, 2014, industry must submit all required plans. The AER will complete a technical review before approving those plans. Industry will be expected to meet deadlines set out in the final approved plans. Affected companies need to understand AER expectations. To this end, the AER met with the established industry steering committee and individual companies. The AER offered in-field training for local Peace River operators to teach them about the inspection process outlined in the new Directive 060: Hydrocarbon Odour Management Protocol for Upstream Oil and Gas Point Source Venting and Fugitive Emissions. The AER proactively engaged the media to show its commitment to implementing the proceeding recommendations. AER staff also had informal conversations with residents to gauge how satisfied they were with the proceeding recommendations, whether they were seeing improvements in their community, and how they might want to move forward. An AER-initiated meeting with the involved residents and Alberta Health Services (AHS) was held on June 19, 2014. The AER introduced the residents to AER staff who would be leading the implementation efforts and explained how the AER was moving forward to implement the recommendations. Staff explained that the recommendations would be implemented step-by-step and that being realistic about timelines was important. Information was provided about how the AER was going to enforce the Directive 060 requirements for offensive off-lease odours, and AHS updated residents on how they were meeting their recommendations as well. At these meetings, residents told the AER that it is not odours, but rather emissions that cause the impacts they live with. It is important that the AER focus on eliminating emissions. The residents acknowledge that while the ambient total hydrocarbon levels are decreasing in their community, they still experience health impacts many times every month. Residents requested that the AER review the process it uses for responding to odour complaints in the Three Creeks area as well. Potential next steps include inviting broader community participation and seeking industry support. In summer 2014, the AER Peace River project teams continued to move forward, and engagement focused on consulting existing pre-aer proceeding groups to find out if they were going to remain active, what they were working on, and how we could best work together. The AER continued to monitor compliance throughout the summer to ensure industry was meeting expectations from the proceeding, in addition to the AER s new requirements. Compliance sweep results were published on the AER website and e-mailed to the residents along with the monthly progress update and status report. 2 Alberta Energy Regulator - Evaluating Engagement in Peace River

The AER began evaluating its stakeholder engagement efforts in August 2014. To help the AER stakeholder engagement team increase public trust and confidence in the regulatory system in the Peace River area, the AER will ask stakeholders to identify what engagement processes work best for them. Successful engagement is not how many meetings we plan or attend; rather, it is about how effectively we meet stakeholder expectations. In other words, it is very important that affected stakeholders are included in decision making wherever possible. The AER stakeholder engagement team will be working with technical implementation teams in the upcoming months to identify opportunities within their project plans to directly involve stakeholders. A second resident meeting was held on October 2, 2014. The goal of this meeting was to update the residents on the current status of implementing the recommendations and to discuss future engagement expectations. What the AER heard at this meeting was that although the AER is moving ahead with implementing the recommendations, we need to acknowledge that residents are still experiencing real-life impacts, not only from emissions, but from garbage, dust, noise, traffic safety issues, etc. The residents are very committed to improving their community and they want to work as a community partner to create better outcomes. As a result of feedback offered at the end of this meeting, the AER will hold another resident meeting towards the end of January 2015 and will also form a separate group that can work on planning for future development in the Peace River area. Results from the satisfaction survey from the second resident meeting were more positive than from the first meeting, but we cannot yet say that we have achieved our outcomes. In addition to local stakeholder engagement, the AER provided a high-level overview of the AER s actions in the Peace River area over the past year to Alberta environmental nongovernmental organizations on September 16, 2014. The subsequent conversations were productive and led to an opportunity for representation from that group to provide additional feedback, particularly regarding monitoring air quality in the region. Public opinion research will be used to evaluate the AER s engagement efforts throughout the region. The AER will contribute 10 years of provincial baseline data towards this research. Regional Peace River over-sampling will be added to the annual provincial survey to determine awareness and confidence levels of Peace River residents regarding the AER. The results are expected in spring 2015. As we continually strive to share information more effectively and to improve communications among stakeholders, we will continue to evaluate the success of our engagement work. If anyone would like to become involved in future meetings or would like more information, please contact Tom McGee at tom.mcgee@aer.ca or 403-297-5640. Alberta Energy Regulator- Evaluating Engagement in Peace River 3