Simulation of Brake Pressure Multiplier (BPM) through ANSYS 14.0 For Effective Braking in ATV

Similar documents
DESIGN, ANALYSIS AND FABRICATION OF BRAKING SYSTEM WITH REAR INBOARD BRAKES IN BAJA ATV

Design Analysis and Optimization of Disc Brake

ISSN: International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. Vol. 3, Issue 7, July 2016

Static Structural and Thermal Analysis of Aluminum Alloy Piston For Design Optimization Using FEA Kashyap Vyas 1 Milan Pandya 2

Brake System Fundamentals Chapter 71 Name Date Period

Increase Factor of Safety of Go-Kart Chassis during Front Impact Analysis

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

ISSN: [Patil et al., 5(10): October, 2016] Impact Factor: 4.116

Restructuring of an Air Classifier Rotor by Finite Element Analysis

Modification of an Existing Small Hydraulic Jack for Lifting Light Duty Vehicle

DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF IC ENGINE GO-KART

ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION OF CONNECTING ROD USING ALFASiC COMPOSITES

Dynamic Analysis of Double Wishbone and Double Wishbone with S Link + Toe Link

STIFFNESS CHARACTERISTICS OF MAIN BEARINGS FOUNDATION OF MARINE ENGINE

HARMONIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF GEARBOX

Static Stress Analysis of Piston

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF PUSH ROD ROCKER ARM SUSPENSION USING MONO SPRING

Design and Stress Analysis of Crankshaft for Single Cylinder 4-Stroke Diesel Engine

FEM Analysis of Combined Paired Effect on Piston & Connecting Rod using ANSYS

Load Analysis and Multi Body Dynamics Analysis of Connecting Rod in Single Cylinder 4 Stroke Engine

[Vishal*et al., 5(7): July, 2016] ISSN: IC Value: 3.00 Impact Factor: 4.116

Design and Simulation of Go Kart Chassis

Student, Mechanical Engineering PVPIT, Bavdhan, Pune, Savitribai Phule Pune University

Analysis Of Vehicle Air Compressor Mounting Bracket

STUDY AND ANALYSIS OF CONNECTING ROD PARAMETERS USING ANSYS

Fault Diagnosis of Lakvijaya Power Plant: A Case Study of an Anti-Rotational Pin Failure

Fig no. 1- Assembly of smart braking system.

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF CONNECTING ROD USING ANSYS

DEVELOPMENT OF HYDRAULIC BRAKE DESIGN SYSTEM APPLICATION

Consideration of Anti-Vibration Performance Improvement of a Servo Motor

Exhaust Gas Waste Heat Recovery and Utilization System in IC Engine

Modeling and Analysis of Tractor Trolley Axle Using Ansys

Design And Development Of Roll Cage For An All-Terrain Vehicle

Design and Development Of Opposite Piston Engine

Design Analysis of Connecting rod of 4 strokes Single Cylinder Petrol Engine

Thermal Stress Analysis of Diesel Engine Piston

Development of Motorized Car Jack

Design and Analysis of Go-kart Chassis

LECTURE-23: Basic concept of Hydro-Static Transmission (HST) Systems

PIONEER RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GROUP

MULTI-PARAMETER OPTIMIZATION OF BRAKE OF PISTON

Design Methodology of Steering System for All-Terrain Vehicles

DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF TREADMILL TO GENERATE ELECTRICITY BY USING MECHANICAL ENERGY

Modelling Automotive Hydraulic Systems using the Modelica ActuationHydraulics Library

Non-Linear Simulation of Front Mudguard Assembly

Finite element analysis of profile modified spur gear

Design, analysis and mounting implementation of lateral leaf spring in double wishbone suspension system

Stress Analysis in Pulley of Stacker-Reclaimer by Using Fem Vs Analytical

Analysis of Turn Table Assembly of Semi- Automatic High Pressure Molding Machine

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF PRE- INSERTION RESISTOR MECHANISM

Keywords: Von Mises, Piston, Thermal Analysis, Pressure, CATIAV5R20, ANSYS14 I. INTRODUCTION

Published by: PIONEER RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GROUP ( 1

THERMAL ANALYSIS OF PISTON BLOCK USING FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

Design and Analysis of 2 - Speed gearbox for Bicycles

Structural Analysis of a Ceramic Coated Diesel Engine Piston Using Finite Element Method

Research in hydraulic brake components and operational factors influencing the hysteresis losses

Design and Analysis of New Locking Mechanism For Fixing Wheels To An Automobile with minimum Human effort

Low-torque Deep-groove Ball Bearings for Transmissions

Design and Analysis of Pressure Die Casting Die for Side Differential Cover of Mini truck

STRESS ANALYSIS OF PISTON USING PRESSURE LOAD AND THERMAL LOAD

Analysis and Optimization of Material For KTM Motorcycle (Duke 390) Front Alloy Wheel

IJESRT. Scientific Journal Impact Factor: (ISRA), Impact Factor: 1.852

Static And Modal Analysis of Tractor Power Take Off (PTO) Gearbox Housing

Design, Analysis& Optimization of Truck chassis- Rail & Cross member

Design of Automated Outriggers for Self- Propelled Hydraulic Scissor Lift - A Case Study At Air India

ANALYSIS OF EXISTING TROLLEY AXLE USING ANSYS

Gearless Power Transmission-Offset Parallel Shaft Coupling

Improvement of Vehicle Dynamics by Right-and-Left Torque Vectoring System in Various Drivetrains x

Basic Static Load Rating of Rolling Contact Bearings

Design and Analysis of a Space Frame Tubular Chassis for a Formula Student car

Redesign and Analysis of Automobile Wheel Rim #1 Pandit Shailesh, #2 Gajjal Shekhar

Design of Back stopper Mechanism for Automobiles

STATIC AND FATIGUE ANALYSIS OF LEAF SPRING-AS A REVIEW

Integrated Automated Jacks for 4-wheelers

Chapter 7: Thermal Study of Transmission Gearbox

MECA0063 : Braking systems

S.Sivaraj #1, A.Hazemohzammed *1, M.Yuvaraj *2, N.Karthikeyan *3, V.Murugan *4, # Assistant Prof., Dept, * U.G Students,

558. Dynamics of loadings acting on coupling device of accelerating auto-train

Vibration Analysis of an All-Terrain Vehicle

CHAP: MACHINES Q: 1. Q: 1(Numerical) Answer Total length of crowbar =120 cm Load arm =20 cm Effort arm = =100 cm Q: 2

Design & Manufacturing of an Effective Steering System for a Formula Student Car

Design and Analysis of Spring-Ball Clutch Torque Limiter

Design and Validation of Hydraulic brake system for Utility Vehicle

Design and Analysis of suspension system components

Four Wheel Steering Mechanism

PREDICTION OF PISTON SLAP OF IC ENGINE USING FEA BY VARYING GAS PRESSURE

Vibration Reduction in Aerospace Bracket through Structural Design

Design and Analysis of Mini Dumper

Design Improvement in Kingpin Stub Axle Assembly Using FEA

Special edition paper

Static Analysis of Crankcase and Crankshaft of Single Cylinder Four Stroke Diesel Engine

Weight reduction of Steering Knuckle by Optimization Method

Fatigue Life Estimation of Chassis Frame FESM Bracket for Commercial Vehicle

AIR COMPRESSED VEHICLE

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF TELESCOPIC JACK

Design and Vibrational Analysis of Flexible Coupling (Pin-type)

Design of High Pressure Double Acting Cylinder for Hydraulic Press Brake

DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF COMBINED FATIGUE TESTING MACHINE

Design and Optimisation of Roll Cage of a Single Seated ATV

Design of Road Power Generator (RPG):an Alternate Energy Source for Sustainability

Transcription:

RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS Simulation of Brake Pressure Multiplier (BPM) through ANSYS 14.0 For Effective Braking in ATV Ronak Bandil 2, Anand Baghel 1,Akash Singh Parihar 2, Shubham Kumar Verma 2,Vikas Singh 2 1 Faculty, RJIT Tekanpur, 2 B. Tech Scholar, RJIT Tekanpur ABSTRACT The requirement of brake systems have become increasingly complex in recent years due to the expansion of global markets and diversification of the conditions under which vehicles are used in different parts of the world. It is also becoming increasingly important to ensure that vehicles offer the secure and better braking effect which are expected by drivers, but can also provide less aggressive feel to driver while severe braking. For providing these requirements, we have introduced a new brake booster which is completely hydraulic named BRAKE PRESSURE MULTIPLIER. We designed it with keeping all the requirements of brake system and driver in mind; it multiplies the driver force up to a limit which is required for the brakes to stop a vehicle in minimum distance and also with less aggressive feel to driver. This booster is completely hydraulic so no external sources are required to run this booster like conventional brake booster in which engine is used to produce vacuum or air pressure for working of booster. The chances of condition of brake fail is also reduced in ours design because of no hose pipes used in this like in conventional boosters, also the weight of whole assembly is very less than the conventional ones. Keywords: Brake Pressure Multiplier, booster, braking effort I. Introduction In today s conventional brake boosters we have to use engine for creating vacuum hence for overcome this effect We introduce a concept of HYDRAULIC BRAKE BOOSTER in which brake force is multiplied with the help of hydraulic mechanism not with the help of atmospheric pressure or vacuum generated by engine. variations (internal differences) remain the same. Also we know that the pressure is equal to the ratio of force to the area over which that force is distributed. Hence Pressure = Force/Area III. Working In the Brake Pressure Multiplier there is variable cross section shell made up of aluminium alloy inside which there are 2 pistons of different diameters. As this assembly is mounted between the brake pedal and master cylinder the 2 pistons are connected with these two, out of which the smaller diameter piston is connected with the brake pedal with the help of push rod and bigger piton is connected with the master cylinder by the push rod, and between these 2 pistons fluid (dot 3) is filled. Fig 5.1 Brake pressure multiplier with all the major components II. Principle This works on general law of fluid mechanics PASCAL S LAW which states that Pressure exerted anywhere in a confined incompressible fluid is transmitted equally in all direction throughout the fluid such that the pressure Fig 5.2 Brake hydraulic circuit along with brake pedal & brake pressure multiplier. 299 P a g e

Hence when we applied force on the brake pedal the smaller piston displaces and forces the fluid and hence fluid displaces the bigger piston but due to difference in their areas the force transmitted by bigger piston to the master cylinder is more than the actual pedal force hence the force is multiplied. And the ratio of input and output forces is equal to the ratio of smaller and bigger diameter. IV. Calculation Let we assume the driver force or the force acting on small piston is, F 1 = 100 N And diameter of small piston, D 1 = 2.85 cm Diameter of large piston, D 2 = 3.8 cm Hence area of smaller piston = 6.37 cm 2 Area of large piston A 2 = = 3.14*(3.8) 2 /4 = 11.33 cm 2 We know that from Pascal s law the pressure applied on each piston is equal hence P 1 = P 2 And pressure P= F/A So, F 1 /A 1 = F 2 /A 2 100/6.37 = F 2 /11.33 F 2 = 177.86 N Hence we get that the force applied on the master cylinder will be 177.86 N which means that force is multiplied by 1.77 times or increased by 77%. As the only connection between the two pistons is only fluid hence the displacement of both pistons is different because of their different diameters, we can calculate the displacement by following method. The maximum displacement of push rod in master cylinder is 3.5 cm hence the displacement of large piston should be equal to this i.e. 3.5 cm Now we know that volume of fluid is constant throughout the time hence A 1 *L 1 = A 2 *L 2 Where L 1 & L 2 are the displacement of small and large piston respectively 6.37*L 1 = 11.33*3.5 L 1 = 6.2 cm From above result we got that we displacement of small piston will be more than the large piston so we have to displace the small piston more for complete travel of push rod in master cylinder. V. Design During the operation of brake pressure multiplier the magnitude of acting forces and pressure is very high and fluctuating so to validate our design we have analysed all the main components of brake pressure multiplier in. ANSYS 14.0 work bench. Following are the results of simulation performed on different parts. 5.1 SHELL Shell is not the working part of Brake Pressure Multiplier but still it is suffered from higher pressure and forces. During operating condition of brake pressure multiplier it is suffered from internal pressure of fluid which is inside the shell of brake pressure multiplier. The calculation of pressure and the simulation of shell on that pressure is given as follows Maximum tensile strength of material (aluminium 1016) = 83 Mpa Then circumferential stress σ c = maximum tensile strength / factor of safety σ c = 83/7 =11.85 Mpa We take the thickness of shell, t= 3 mm Because the thickness of shell is less with respect to the diameter and length of shell we can consider this as thin cylinder, hence by the property of thin cylinder t = P*D 1 / 2 σ c P = 2t σ c / D 1 Where P is the internal pressure in the shell. We calculate the maximum pressure from the smaller diameter section because the pressure in the large diameter section is less than the previous section. P = 2.5 Mpa Fig 6.1 (a) Stress diagram of shell This is the von mises stress diagram of shell. Here the max stress producing is 33 Mpa which is far below than ultimate tensile strength of our material. Hence we conclude that our design is safe & do not break or crack under such worst loading. 300 P a g e

This is the stress diagram of our minor piston or sender piston. Here the max stress generated is 6.3Mpa. On dividing tensile strength with this stress we get appreciable factor of safety which proves that our design is safe. Fig 6.1 (b) Deformation diagram of shell This is the displacement diagram of our shell. Here the max displacement produced is.0033mm which is very small in size & can easily be neglected. Therefore we conclude that our shell structure is capable of bearing such worst loading with a very small deformation. 5.2 SMALL PISTON Pistons of brake pressure multiplier are also suffered from severe forces and pressure, we see that the shell of BPM is only suffered from pressure only but piston will suffered from both pressure and force, the magnitude of both forces and pressure can be calculated as follows Let consider the driver force be 100 N Since due to pedal ratio which is taken as 4:1, hence the input force= 400 N The piston is suffered by the driver force from one side and suffered from internal pressure of fluid from other side that pressure can be calculated as Pressure P = Force /πr 1 2 P = 0.627 MPa We analyse the piston by considering the force of 400 N on the outer side and pressure of 00.627 MPa on the inner side of piston. The material we chose for the piston is Aluminium alloy so that it will be of light weight and of good strength. The length of piston we take is 4 cm so that it can withstand severe forces and high pressure. A slot is cut in the piston for provide a better seal for preventing leakage. Fig 6.2 (b) Deformation diagram of minor piston This is the deformation diagram of our minor piston. Here the max deformation produced is.0004mm. which is negligible & can easily be neglected & also the area where this deformation is produced is not much of greater use. 5.3 LARGE PISTON Pistons of brake pressure multiplier are also suffered from severe forces and pressure, we see that the shell of BPM is only suffered from pressure only but piston will suffered from both pressure and force, the magnitude of both forces and pressure can be calculated as follows Because the output force is increased by 77% hence the force on outer side of piston will be 708 N The internal pressure will be the same as we calculated above i.e..627 MPa hence we analyse the piston by considering the force of 708 N at outer surface and pressure of.627 MPa at inner surface. Fig 6.3 (a) Stress diagram of major piston Fig 6.2 (a) stress diagram of minor piston This is the equivalent stress diagram of our major piston.in this max stress generated is 6.35Mpa which is easily acceptable. We get an appreciable factor of safety which concludes that our design is safe. 301 P a g e

Fig 6.3 (b) Deformation diagram of major piston This is the displacement diagram of our major piston. In this the max deformation produced is.00042mm. which is quite acceptable. Its not only concludes that our design is safe, but also concludes that our design is capable in working such worst condition without any failure. VI. Effect Of Brake Pressure Multiplier On Brakes Consider a vehicle having mass of 800kg.so following are the initial data about this vehicle required for calculation. Gross weight of vehicle = 800 *10 = 8000 N Centre of gravity height from ground (h) = 40cm Wheelbase (l) = 160cm Deceleration rate (a) = 1g Since the vehicle is rear engine rear wheel drive, so the weight on rear wheels is more than weight on front wheels. Let us assume that weight distribution is 40:60.i-e 40% on front & 60% on rear. So weight distribution is 3200 N on front wheels & 4800 N on rear wheels. Now we calculate the DYNAMIC WEIGHT TRANSFER For front wheels it is = W front + W total *(h/l)*(a/g) For rear wheels it is = W rear W total *(h/l)*(a/g) On calculating dynamic weight transfer for front & rear wheels are as follows For front wheels = 5200N For rear wheels = 2800N This is the required force that requires for a vehicle to stop. Individual force required for each wheel is For front wheel = 2600 N For rear wheel = 1400 N Since the tyre diameter is of 23 inch Hence tyre radius is 11.5 inch or 29.21 cm Brake torque required for front wheel= 759.46 N-m Brake torque required for rear wheel= 408.94 N-m This is the required brake force & brake torque requires stopping a vehicle. Now generating brake force & torque without any external aid (i-e brake pressure multiplier or Hydraulic brake booster.) In worst condition, when the brake is suddenly applied, it is assumed that the max. Input force which is applied by the driver is 100N Since the pedal ratio is 4:1, the input force which is going to the master cylinder =400N Since the master cylinder diameter is 19.05 mm. the pressure generated inside the master cylinder is = force/ area = 1.40 Mpa Now the clamping force or generating force generated by the master cylinder is = master cylinder pressure* calliper piston area = 1939.61 N Since the generated brake force is less than required brake force. Hence brake will not be applied or you can say brakes are failed. Now brake force generated with the help of brake pressure multiplier. Since we know that from the above experiment it is clear that it increases the efficiency up to 77%. So the input force= 708 N Now the brake pressure generated inside master cylinder = 708/ (3.14*9.525 2 ) =2.49Mpa Now clamping force generated = 2.49*3.14*(21) 2 = 3449.75 N Since the clamping force is more than required hence brakes are applied. Brake torque will be generated by = 3449.75*.23 = 793.44 N-m Since the clamping force & torque are more than required. VII. Advantages Of Brake Pressure Multiplier 1. It increases the brake pressure by 77% hence the stopping distance of vehicle is reduced. 2. Since due to hydraulic medium the power loss between pistons is very less i.e. 1-2% 3. Does not require any external power source for operating. 4. Constant power output throughout his operation. 5. Compact size. 6. Long lasting Since the factor of safety is more than 7 so its operating life will be more. 7. Because of having lees no of parts its manufacturing cost is low. 8. As the whole assembly is made up of Aluminium hence the weight of assembly is low. 9. Services & maintenance cost are very less. 302 P a g e

10. Since the medium used between the pistons is hydraulic, so wear and tear of pistons is less. VIII. Conclusion Hence by calculation stated above we can conclude the result that without using the brake booster it is very difficult to stop the vehicle because the brake force generated by the master cylinder is not enough for stopping the vehicle because the force generated on each wheel while propulsion is much higher than the brake force. So the need of brake boosters is obvious in vehicles and the need is increased as the weight of the vehicle is increased. But as we stated above the conventional brake boosters has their own disadvantages so we can t use conventional brake boosters hence our design of brake pressure multiplier easily replace conventional brake boosters and fulfil the requirement of brake system. IX. References [1] http://www.ecihotrodbrakes.com/brake_pressu re_multiplier.html [2] Nice, Karim (2000-08-22). "How Power Brakes Work". Howstuffworks.com. Retrieved 2011-03-12. [3] Thoms, E. (1988), "Disc brakes for heavy vehicles", IMechE, pp. 133 137 [4] Jacobsson, H. (1999), SAE Technical Paper Series, no. 1999-01-1779, pp. 1 14 [5] Sutherland, Howard (2004). Sutherland's Handbook for Bicycle Mechanics Chapter 11 - Brakes (7th ed.). Sutherland's Bicycle Shop Aids, Inc. p. 13. Retrieved 2011-10-09 [6] Langworth, Richard M. (1994). Chrysler and Imperial: The Postwar Years. Motorbooks International. ISBN 0-87938-034-9. [7] Kundu, Pijush K.; Cohen, Ira M. (2008), Fluid Mechanics (4th revised ed.), Academic Press, [8] Currie, I. G. (1974), Fundamental Mechanics of Fluids, McGraw-Hill, Inc.,ISBN 0-07- 015000 303 P a g e