GRRF The target of a Brake Assist System... reduce the pedal force emergency situation

Similar documents
Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission (EC) Informal Document No. GRRF (62nd GRRF, September 2007, agenda item 3(i))

Amendments to R78. Annex 3, paragraph (c), amend to read (inserting a new footnote */):

Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 (steering equipment) Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1

Proposals for amendments to Regulation No. 63

Low Carbon Technology Project Workstream 8 Vehicle Dynamics and Traction control for Maximum Energy Recovery

Status of the review of the General Safety and Pedestrian Safety Regulations

ECE-R13 New proposal for Annex 23

CEMA position on draft braking regulation, 4 June 2008 ENTR/F1/ /rev16

Proposal for the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79

Revised proposal to amend UN Global Technical Regulation No. 3 (Motorcycle brake systems) I. Statement of technical rationale and justification

Modifications to UN R131 AEBS for Heavy Vehicles

POSITION PAPER Version 3.0

Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad-hoc group on LKAS/RCP

Proposal for UN Regulation on AEBS for M1/N1

Economic and Social Council

Economic and Social Council

Proposal for amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2018/9. I. Statement of technical rationale and justification

Advanced emergency braking systems for commercial vehicles

Amendments to the 02 series of amendments to Regulation No. 117 (Tyre rolling noise, wet grip adhesion and rolling resistance)

Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79

Emergency Steering Function (ESF)

Economic and Social Council

Introduction of Booster Cushions in R129

Proposal for amendments to Regulation No.79 (Steering equipment)

DRAFT REPORT. 3 rd meeting of the Informal Working Group (IWG) on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for light vehicles

Economic and Social Council

Comments on GRE/2012/27(Lighting & Signalling WG) Headlamp Initial Aiming October 2012

Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF

124 th MEETING OF THE WORKING GROUP ON "MOTOR VEHICLES" 20 October 2014 Agenda item 4:

ECE/TRANS/180/Add.3/Amend.2

Indian Tyre Production Estimate

JRC technical and scientific support to the research on safety aspects of the use of refrigerant 1234yf on MAC systems

Transmitted by the expert from Germany

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.77/Rev.1/Amend.3 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.77/Rev.1/Amend.3

Global Technical Regulation No. 16 (Tyres)

Interim Report by GRB IWG ASEP About UN R51.03 ASEP by Paragraph Last Sentence Informal Document to GRB 68 (Sep-2018)

ACEA RDE Cold Start. 30 th August 2016

Economic and Social Council

Economic and Social Council

Provläsningsexemplar / Preview INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Motorcycles - Brakes and braking devices - Tests and measurement methods

Design and Validation of Hydraulic brake system for Utility Vehicle

A Comparative Study on Automotive Brake Testing Standards

Informal Document No. GRSP-36-4 (36th GRSP, 7-10 December 2004, agenda item B.1.2)

Proposal for amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/9

HECU Clock frequency 32 MHz 50 MHz Memory 128 KB 512 KB Switch Orifice Orifice. Operating temperature - 40 C to 150 C - 40 C to 150 C

- 13: Definition of parking brake CEMA proposes to replace parking brake by parking braking system

Remote Control Parking (RCP)

QUESTION / CLARIFICATION

Economic and Social Council

China Proposal for Micro-Van and Micro-Truck

Economic and Social Council

Revision of ASEP Considerations for Future Steps Enhancement of the presentation from Germany

CER/EIM Position Paper Ballast Pick-up due to Aerodynamic Effects. October Version 1.0

DRAFT REPORT 2nd meeting of the Informal Working Group (IWG) on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for light vehicles

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.50/Rev.3/Amend.2 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.50/Rev.3/Amend.2

Economic and Social Council

Economic and Social Council

Torque Influence on C3 category tyres

A dream? Dr. Jürgen Bredenbeck Tire Technology Expo, February 2012 Cologne

JAPANESE COMMENTS ON US PROPOSAL OF INF.DOC.NO.6( 45 TH GRRF)

Hybrid Architectures for Automated Transmission Systems

Status of Research Work of EEVC WG 15 Compatibility Between Cars

SLIP CONTROL AT SMALL SLIP VALUES FOR ROAD VEHICLE BRAKE SYSTEMS

WLTP Revision 1

Official Journal of the European Union

PROPOSAL FOR DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO REGULATION No. 48. (Installation of lighting and light-signalling devices) Transmitted by the expert France

Position Paper. Anti-lock Braking for Agricultural Tractors

ISO Earth-moving machinery Wheeled or high-speed rubber-tracked machines Performance requirements and test procedures for brake systems

Economic and Social Council

Compatibility bands ECE R13

CEMA PT16 N09Rev2. Reference document: ENTR_F1_ _rev 16 v Article / clause Original text Proposal from CEMA Rationale and

07 GRP04_All Transmissions.xls

Deflection of Deployable Bonnets in DB Systems

Christian Theis 52 nd GRB, 6-8 September 2010, ASEP outline. Summary & Conclusion

ECE Regulation N th session of GRSP December 2013

MPN Mechanical pneumatic level control for Bilz air springs

Automated Driving UNECE International Harmonization

Application of Steering Robot in the Test of Vehicle Dynamic Characteristics

TÜV SÜD Tire Test 2017

Pedestrian Protection in Europe

54 rd Meeting Informal Group on Child Restraint Systems Booster Seat Width Development. 27 th October2015

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.89/Rev.3/Amend.3 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.89/Rev.3/Amend.3

Certification Memorandum

capacity due to increased traction; particularly advantageous on road surfaces

A Brake Pad Wear Control Algorithm for Electronic Brake System

ECE Regulation N th session of GRSP May Informal document GRSP Rev.1 (55 th GRSP, May 2013, agenda item 18)

Regulation No Uniform provisions concerning the approval of replacement pollution control devices for power-driven vehicles

Draft Proposal for category [C1] requirements

TÜV SÜD Tire Test 2016

TÜV SÜD - Tire Test 2017

I. Road Safety Targets and Indicators. II. Follow-up. III. Proposal. Note by the secretariat

Informal document No. 80th GRSG, 2-6 April 2001, agenda item 6. Distr. GENERAL

} Rev.1/Add.12/Rev.6/Amend.3

Headlight Test and Rating Protocol (Version I)

Economic and Social Council

Proposed Special Condition for limited Icing Clearances Applicable to Large Rotorcraft, CS 29 or equivalent. ISSUE 1

The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79

} Rev.1/Add.12/Rev.6/Amend.4

DRAFT: Front Contact Surface Head Restraint

CEMA position on the draft Regulation on braking for tractors & the need for a balanced regulatory approach on ABS. 03 July 2013

Transcription:

Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document No. GRRF-63-39 (63rd GRRF, 4-8 February 2008, agenda item 3(g)) EU Directive on Brake Assist The target of a Brake Assist System... is to significantly reduce the pedal force needed for full activation of braking up to the ABS operation level, in order to gain an advantage in any emergency situation. According to ECE/TRANS/WP29/GRRF/2008/2 There are 3 types of BAS are being considered: - Systems sensitive to brake pedal force - Systems sensitive to brake pedal application speed - Systems sensitive to combinations of brake pedal application speed and further qualifying parameters such as force. All systems adjust the pressure response to brake pedal input

To meet the target of a Brake Assist System In an EMERGENCY situation the driver must: a) be paying attention to the road ahead... b) detect the pedestrian... c) see that this is an emergency!!! d) immediately release the throttle and rapidly... e) hit the brake pedal as hard as possible. Brake Assist helps those drivers who, for some reason, cannot apply sufficient force to the pedal.

EU Directive on Brake Assist Systems sensitive to BRAKE PEDAL FORCE ACEA / WP29 on 20 Jan 2005, described a force sensitive systems as: Systems sensitive to brake pedal force have a different characteristic of pedal force versus brake pressure for small and high pedal forces. This requirement can, as one cost effective solution, be fulfilled by an optimized Dual Rate booster

EU Directive 2003/102/EC Acceptance criteria for FORCE sensing devices using dual rate boost: The additional pedal effort from the threshold point up to the line pressure level which achieves ABS operation on a high adhesion surface, must be reduced by between 40% & 80% compared to a vehicle using a standard braking system having only the single (initial) boost ratio. This is to be calculated using the following method:

Acceptance criteria for force sensing devices a ABS = Deceleration for ABS operation F ABS = Pedal force to obtain ABS operation F ABS extrapolated = Theoretical pedal force to obtain ABS operation if only an initial boost ratio is present Remark : a T shall be between 3.5 ~5m/s 2 This appears to be based on the underlying assumption (shown dotted) that the projected braking characteristic will be linear. However, THIS IS NOT ALWAYS THE CASE! Dual Rate is OK, if : 100 % reduced by 40 % reduced by 80 % ( F 40% < ABS extrapolated -F ABS ) < 80% ( F ABS extrapolated -F T )

Fig.4

Linearity depends on where the line drawn. Response P is the nearest to being linear. Response B is clearly not linear and M is notably non-linear at the high end...

. and some heavier vehicles such as N 1 s are seriously non linear. and some heavier vehicles are seriously non-linear. However, if However restoring linearity, gives some 60% reduction in pedal effort. linear operation could be achieved, a 65% reduction in PE is made. aabs aabs 60% reduction

An optimized Dual-rate booster can make a large improvement by virtually restoring linearity. This also produces a very good pedal feel especially if the high rate is brought in at a slightly lower deceleration.

The cost is the addition of a small DR cartridge. Dual Rate (DR) Booster ratio disc replaced by DR cartridge

Dual Rate (DR) -the gradient increase is easily seen in the Line pressure characteristic. This can be produced in a static test. P for ABS level of deceleration Output pressure Dual-Rate Characteristic Progressive Ratio Decrease of force Standard Characteristic singleratio Input force

325 N Pressure response SR booster 0 70 140 210 280 350 420 490 560 Pedal Force [N]

175 N Dual Rate Boost Pressure response 0 70 140 210 280 350 420 490 560 Pedal Force [N]

Dual Rate (DR) - pressure response measurement F ABSextrapolated = 330 N p ABS F ABS = 175 N i = 6 DR = OK, if : ( F ABS extrapolated -F ABS ) 40% < < 80% ( F ABS extrapolated -F T ) F T = 70 N ( 330 N - 175 N ) ( 330 N - 70 N ) = 60% 0 70 140 210 280 350 420 490 560 Pedal Force [N]

Optimized Dual Rate (DR) Booster Conclusion from pressure measurement: with DR the Pedal force reduction is met if : 40% < ( F ABS extrapolated -F ABS ) ( F ABS extrapolated -F T ) < 80% Pressure measurement shows 40% < 60% < 80% Pedal Force reduction is significant & the... Requirement for Force based Brake Assist is fulfilled.

This proposal seeks to permit a pressure assessment option as an alternative to deceleration measurement in Cat A BAS. The optimized DR booster can then be recognised as a BAS P ABS Line Pressure, P Force change threshold P T F T F ABS, min F ABS, max F ABS, extrapolated Brake Pedal force, F

Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal Document No. GRRF-63-06 (63 rd GRRF, 4-8 February 2008, agenda item 3(g)) Regulation 13-H, Annex 10 A Proposal. Add an additional paragraph 3.2.5. and amend the title of Figure 1 to read Figure 1a and add an additional Figure 1b. 3.2.5. As an alternative, which can be selected by the manufacturer, the pedal force figures for F T, F ABS,min, F ABS,max and F AB,extrapolated may be derived from the brake line pressure response characteristic instead of the vehicle deceleration characteristic. This shall be measured as the brake pedal force is increasing. 3.2.5.1. The pressure, at which ABS cycling commences, shall be determined by making five tests from 80 km/h in which the brake pedal is applied up to the level which produces ABS operation and the five pressures at which this occurs as determined from front wheel pressure records, shall be recorded and the mean value obtained as P ABS. 3.2.5.2. The threshold pressure P T shall be stated by the manufacturer. 3.2.5.3. Figure 1b shall be constructed in the manner set out in paragraph 3.2.4. but using line pressure measurements to define the parameters set out in paragraph 3.2.5 above where: FT PABS FABS,extrapolat ed = P T P ABS Line Pressure, P Force change threshold P T F T F ABS, min F ABS, max Brake Pedal force, F Figure 1b F ABS, extrapolated