An Overview of Rapid Transit Typical Characteristics. Date April 30, 2009

Similar documents
APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Public Meeting. June 15, :30 7:30 p.m.

Appendix G: Rapid Transit Technology Backgrounder July 2017

Modal Choice for Mass Rapid Transit

PAWG Meeting #3a Tier 1 Evaluation

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Initial Screening Analysis

What IS BRT, Really? Not BRT and RNY

BRT: What is it & Where Does it Fit? Sam Zimmerman

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

Preliminary Definition of Alternatives. 3.0 Preliminary Definition of Alternatives

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

Toolbox Transit Presentation Professors Joseph DiJohn and Siim Sööt University of Illinois at Chicago

West Broadway Transit Study. Community Advisory Committee September 17, 2015

What is the Connector?

HOW TO DELIVER PUBLIC TRANSPORT ON REDUCED BUDGET

6/11/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Streetcar and Light Rail Design Differences. March 2015

2.1 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Expand regional rapid transit networks STRATEGIC DIRECTION

SERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES

Yonge-Eglinton. Mobility Hub Profile. September 19, 2012 YONGE- EGLINTON

Bus Rapid Transit. Jennifer Flynn and Cheryl Thole Senior Research Associates Commuter Choice Workshop January 2012 Tampa, FL

We Want Your Input! Review the design alternatives and tell us what s important to you in the design of these areas of the approved BRT Network:

PUBLIC TRANSPORT MODAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ROLES

CA PACITY TRA MWAY. November CODATU XVII High capacity tramway November

BRT: NOT JUST LOW COST

PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP. Current Status & Next Steps

Light rail, Is New Zealand Ready for Light Rail? What is Needed in Terms of Patronage, Density and Urban Form.

Calgary Transit and the Calgary Transportation Plan Chris Jordan, M.Sc., P.Eng. Coordinator, Strategic Transit Planning, Calgary Transit

THE WILSHIRE CORRIDOR: RAIL AND ITS ALTERNATIVES. Prepared By: Jacki Murdock Transportation and Environmental Planner

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit

Road Map for Sustainable Transport Strategy for Colombo Metropolitan Region with Cleaner Air, through Experience

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Light Rail Transit: Ugly Duckling Becomes a Swan

Public Meeting. March 21, 2013 Mimosa Elementary School

Pacific Electric Right-of-Way / West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis

CTfastrak Expansion. Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016

Regional Integration of Public Transit - From the Perspective of a Transit Company. April 2019 Thomas Werner MVG Munich

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. TAC Briefing December 4, 2013

Transit on the New NY Bridge

Streetcar and Light Rail Design Differences. February 2015

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

Needs and Community Characteristics

Energy efficiency policies for transport. John Dulac International Energy Agency Paris, 29 May 2013

Brian Pessaro, AICP National Bus Rapid Transit Institute

Chapter 2 How Transportation Technology Has Shaped Urban Travel Patterns

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. Community Meetings April/May, 2012

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority. Joe Calabrese CEO/General Manager

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Key Issues Memo

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

East Bay Bus Rapid Transit Project. Downtown Oakland to San Leandro International Blvd to East 14 th St

Istanbul METROBUS BRT. Adapted from Presentations by World Resources Institute/EMBARQ s Sibel Koyluoglu and Dario Hidalgo

Making Tracks to Torontonians 2012

Reducing Vehicle Use in Megacities Johanna Partin, N. America Regional Director Transportation and Energy Conference August 8, 2013

Bus Rapid Transit. Briefing. Common to all BRT schemes is the aim to improve passengers experience and percep on of public transport

2013 Study Tour. Density, Integrated Transport Networks, Affordable Housing & Urban Renewal

Safer Swifter Better Leadrail Infra Solutions Pvt. Ltd. / INDIA

International and USA BRT TOD Comparisons. Cliff Henke and Kimi Iboshi Sloop, Parsons Brinckerhoff

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

Chapter 4 : THEME 2. Transportation

Navigating in Different Rivers

Stakeholders Advisory Working Group Traffic and Transit Group Meeting #4, October 10, 2007

Transit on the SC Rail Corridor

West Broadway Transit Study. Minnesota APA Conference Charles Carlson, Metro Transit Adele Hall, SRF Consulting September 24, 2015

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

Project Scoping Open House Welcome

FACT SHEET. US 192 Alternatives Analysis Modal Technologies. Alternative Description/Overview

Executive Summary. Phase 2 Evaluation Report. Introduction

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

A level-based approach to public transport network planning

The range of alternatives has been reviewed with the RTAC Subgroup and the preliminary analysis is proceeding on the following HCT alternatives:

2 EXISTING ROUTE STRUCTURE AND SERVICE LEVELS

Reducing Energy Consumption and Emissions Through Congestion Management

Supports Item No. 1 T&T Committee Agenda October 5, 2010

Streetcar Possibilities for Brooklyn

Speaker Information Tweet about this presentation #TransitGIS

Understanding Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) and Transit-Adjacent Development (TAD)

Honolulu Rail Transit Project Light Rail vs. Honolulu Light Metro. Harvey L. Berliner Infraconsult / HDR

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

Office of Transportation Bureau of Traffic Management Downtown Parking Meter District Rate Report

D2 - CBD Second Alignment

WELCOME. Transit Options Amherst - Buffalo Public Workshops

PUBLIC TRANSPORT MODAL CAPACITIES AND COSTS

Crenshaw-Prairie Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings

TRANSIT IDEA STRATEGIC INITIATIVE On BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT)

Development and Overview of the NY 5 Bus Rapid Transit Corridor. New York State MPO Conference June 5, 2009

Transcription:

An Overview of Rapid Transit Typical Characteristics Date April 30, 2009

Land Use and Transportation Is there a link? Streetcar Suburbs were the result of land developers creating streetcar lines in order to bring people to their developments. Rapid Transit has the ability to i fl influence lland d use but only if development is p promoted.

Urban Rapid Transit Historically, Rapid Transit was lid laid out in a finger plan Chicago Regional Network 3 3 or with urban development as pearls on a necklace Chicago Rapid Transit Network

Metrotown Before 1986 Small Retailers Low Density Residential 4 4

Metrotown Today 2nd largest mall in Canada Office, residential, hotel, recreation amenities of a true town centre Note the amount of density the pre existed 5 5

The Land Use-Transit Relationship Efficient transit needs high-density corridors, not just high-density developments Every kilometer of distance costs money; long distances result in less efficient transit Transit can help lead development along corridors 6 6

The Land Use-Transit Relationship The most efficient transit lines are those with fixed lines and fixed stops/stations Stops/stations are determined by: Density: how many residents, jobs, and activities are within walking distance (400m) of a stop Pedestrian access: how many of the activities within a 400m radius are within a 400m walk 7 7

The Land Use-Transit Relationship The ideal pedestrian environment maximizes the street network within a 400m radius A disconnected street pattern means that there are areas that are not accessible to pedestrians 8 8

Coverage vs. Ridership Same # of buses Ridership model The high density areas of the community get frequent service, while the low density areas get no service Coverage model Everyone hastransitservicebutat service at a lower frequency (usually every half hour or hour, with limited evening service) 9 9

Typical Characteristics of Each Transit System Local Bus Express or Rapid Bus Rapid Transit Systems Bus Rapid Modern Light Rail Metro / Transit (BRT) Streetcar Transit Subway Commuter Rail System Speed (including stops) 8 to 25 km/hr 15 to 30km/hr 20 to 40 km/h 20 to 40 km/h 30 to 50 km/h 40 to 70 km/h 30 to 80 km/h System Capacity 200-1,200 passengers/hr 500-3,000 passengers/hr 2,000-10,000 passengers/hr 1,000-6,000 passengers/hr 3,000-18,000 passengers/hr 10,000-40,000 passengers/hr 2,000 to 20,000 passengers/hr People Capacity / Vehicle Running Way Stop/Station Spacing 40-60 40-110 Mixed traffic Mixed traffic and/or exclusive lanes with traffic signal priority 75-110 (Articulated) Exclusive right of way with signal pre-emption at crossings 130-160 150-200 per car 180-280 per car 100-200 per car Mixed traffic and/or Exclusive running Exclusive running Exclusive right of exclusive lanes/ way generally on way fully way with priority at right of way grade segregated grade crossings < 0.3km 0.5 km to 2 km 0.5 km to 2 km < 2 km 1 km to 2 km 1 km to 2 km >2 km

Transit Mode Comparison: Capacity Note the overlap in capacity Source: Transit Cooperative Research Program Transit Capacity Manual 11

Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Branded Service with amenities Dedicated right of way (as much as possible) Transit Signal Priority Attractive stations & real-time info Stations every 1 km or so LRT on Rubber tires Rouen, France Los Angeles, Orange Line Bogota, Columbia Eugene, Oregon

Streetcar/Tram Often confused withlrt Dedicated ROW or in street Stations every 1 km or so Smaller units Longer headways Seattle 13 Portland San Francisco

Light Rail (LRT) Mainly at grade Dedicated right of way Overhead electric power Stops at stations, every 1 km or so Operators on board Sometimes confused with Subway/Metro Heavy Rail Transit Larger Vehicles Calgary Portland Max Blue Line Manila

Automated LRT Fully Segregated Right of Way Stops at stations, every 1 km or so. Automated Trains Third Rail electric power London, England Dockyard LR Line 15 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia E Line Vancouver Millennium Line

Metro/Subway Heavy Rail Larger Vehicle Fully Separated right of way Typically below grade High level of service (as low as 90 second headways) Heavy grade vehicles Operators and conductors Stations every 1km New York 16 Boston Green Line Chicago The L

Commuter Rail Suburbs to downtown Long units with bi level or single level cars Push Pull (1 engine rail car plus passenger rail cars) Budd Car (combined engine/ passenger car 1 unit ) DMU (Larger version of Budd Car) Conductor & Engineer California Push Pull DMU 17 DMU Vancouver Westcoast Express Push Pull Train

What is the difference between Urban rapid transit and regional commuter rail? Urban Rapid Transit is designed to move large volumes of people over short to moderate distances within urbanareas areas Regional Commuter Rail is designed to connect distant suburbs with metropolitan downtown core Show Chicago Extent of Rapid Transit Network Kitsilano (4th Avenue at Waterloo), 1909 18