AIAA Foundation Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Competition. RFP: Cruise Missile Carrier

Similar documents
2000/2001 AIAA FOUNDATION Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Competition

The winner team will have the opportunity to perform a wind tunnel test campaign in the transonic/supersonic Wind tunnel at the VKI.

2012/2013 AIAA Foundation Graduate Team Aircraft Design Competition

Request for Proposal Electric Vertical Takeoff and Landing (E-VTOL) Aircraft

BAYLOR UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING. EGR 4347 Analysis and Design of Propulsion Systems Fall 2002 ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES

Rotary Winged Pylon Racer

2019 SpaceX Hyperloop Pod Competition

24 Hour Hovering Machine Conceptual Design

Innovating the future of disaster relief

Test like you Train Train like you Fight

This Flight Planning Guide is published for the purpose of providing specific information for evaluating the performance of the Cessna Corvalis TT.

Type Acceptance Report

Type Acceptance Report

BOMBARDIER, INC.

XIV.D. Maneuvering with One Engine Inoperative

Designing evtol for the Mission NDARC NASA Design and Analysis of Rotorcraft. Wayne Johnson From VTOL to evtol Workshop May 24, 2018

Special Conditions: General Electric Company, GE9X Engine Models; Endurance Test

Highly Augmented Flight Controls

Baugh Wind Energy Design Competition Saturday, 9 February 2019

Answer Key. Page 1 of 10

AE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design Final Examination. Instructor: Prof. Dr. Serkan ÖZGEN Date:

AVIATION OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR FUEL AND EMISSIONS REDUCTION WORKSHOP Weight Management

Joint AIAA-IGTI Engine Design Competition 2011/12 for Undergraduate Teams

BELL 206L4 A reliable multi-mission capable helicopter with low operating costs.

Jay Gundlach AIAA EDUCATION SERIES. Manassas, Virginia. Joseph A. Schetz, Editor-in-Chief. Blacksburg, Virginia. Aurora Flight Sciences

Accepted Means of Compliance; Airworthiness Standards: Normal Category. SUMMARY: This document announces the availability of 63 Means of Compliance

General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon

AIR TRACTOR, INC. OLNEY, TEXAS

This is a new permit condition titled, "2D.1111 Subpart ZZZZ, Part 63 (Existing Non-Emergency nonblack start CI > 500 brake HP)"

Type Acceptance Report

Bonanza Tuned Exhaust System Pre-Production Agreement

For Reference Only. Jett Pro Line Maintenance FAA REPAIR STATION NO. YUJR093Y EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY (EASA) MANUAL SUPPLEMENT

Weight Effects Part 1

Ballast Water Reporting Form

THE EMPIRE DISTRICT ELECTRIC COMPANY P.S.C. Mo. No. 5 Sec. 4 1st Revised Sheet No. 23

neuron An efficient European cooperation scheme

Proposed Solution for 2000/2001 AIAA Foundation Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Competition May 9, 2001

NEW JERSEY S ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLE REBATE PROGRAM

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR THE PURCHASE OF SOLAR ENERGY

Type Acceptance Report

Cable Dragging Horizontal Takeoff Spacecraft Air Launch System

Fuel Efficiency The Industry, IATA and You

Unmanned Air Vehicles (UAVs): Classification, Legislation and Future applications Presenter: Dr-Ing Dimitrios E. Mazarakos

Classical Aircraft Sizing I

Flight Test Evaluation of C-130H Aircraft Performance with NP2000 Propellers

Auto Service Technician

CONFERENCE ON AVIATION AND ALTERNATIVE FUELS

First Nations Launch Rocket Competition 2016

Innovative Airship Solutions from Guardian Flight Systems

Arkansas State University - Jonesboro

Boeing /-200/-200A Limitations

2019 BQDM Extension Auction Frequently-Asked Questions Updated January 29, 2018

PRATT AND WHITNEY CANADA CORP.

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

MODULE 6 Lower Anchors & Tethers for CHildren

North American F-86F Sabre USER MANUAL. Virtavia F-86F Sabre DTG Steam Edition Manual Version 1

ADVENT. Aim : To Develop advanced numerical tools and apply them to optimisation problems in engineering. L. F. Gonzalez. University of Sydney

PRATT AND WHITNEY CANADA CORP.

Request for Assistance (RFA)

CENTAUR OPTIONALLY-PILOTED AIRCRAFT ULTIMATE FLEXIBILITY FOR AIRBORNE SENSING

AT-10 Electric/HF Hybrid VTOL UAS

XIV.C. Flight Principles Engine Inoperative

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

FINAL REPORT FOR THE C-130 RAMP TEST #3 OF A HYDREMA MINE CLEARING VEHICLE

PRESS RELEASE Q & A. The company decided from the onset to operate under a Boeing licensing umbrella to design and produce parts to Boeing standards.

Ronald F. Livingston Aviation Business Consulting, LLC

13 th Military Airworthiness Conference 25 th September 2013 EASA Presentation. Pascal Medal Head Of Certification Experts Department EASA

Appenidix E: Freewing MAE UAV analysis

Electric Vehicle Charging Station Incentives PROGRAM HANDBOOK

Predator ACTD. Presentation To NDIA IOT&E

Solar-Wind Specific Request for Proposals

European Workshop on Aircraft Design Education 2002

AND BETTER... 14,000 lbs. STC + PT6A-34 Engines (NEW) + Wing Tip Tanks. 5 $100/SEAT x 5 SORTIES PER DAY. 14,000 lbs. STC + PT6A-34 Engines (NEW)

ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION (FORMERLY ALLISON ENGINE COMPANY)

Heating Comparison of Radial and Bias-Ply Tires on a B-727 Aircraft

MEMORANDUM. Proposed Town of Chapel Hill Green Fleets Policy

SILENT SUPERSONIC TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM

(Initial issue) CS-34

Flight Readiness Review Addendum: Full-Scale Re-Flight. Roll Induction and Counter Roll NASA University Student Launch.

VOUCHER INCENTIVE PROGRAM Application Package

KING AIR MODEL C90/C90A

Airport Safety. Given by: Robert Bassey. IESALC Conference, October 24, 2016 San Diego, CA

Sierra. R/STOL High Lift Systems. Toll Free LANCAIR. Sierra R/STOL High Lift System Benefits DURING APPROACH AND LANDING DURING TAKEOFF

SUBJECT: ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM UNIT AND ROTORCRAFT FLIGHT MANUAL TEMPORARY REVISION, CANCELLATION OF

SUBSIDIARY BODY FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVICE Fourteenth session Bonn, July 2001 Item 3 (b) of the provisional agenda

ON-ROAD HEAVY-DUTY TRUCK APPLICATION

Type Acceptance Report

Ports of Delaware and Virginia (DE-VA)* Dray Truck Replacement Program Application

M:2:I Milestone 2 Final Installation and Ground Test

Application for Commission Approval to Construct a Generating Station Pursuant to Public Utilities Article Section and

Robots on Our Sidewalks

Economic Impact of Derated Climb on Large Commercial Engines

Notice of Proposed Amendment Regular update of CS-25

MAGNETIC LEVITATION VEHICLES

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

OUTLINE. Commercial Requirements Insurance Mins Basic Info Systems Limitations Performance Charts Questions

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-NE-27-AD; Amendment 39- Airworthiness Directives; Lycoming Engines Reciprocating Engines

EGLIN AERO CLUB C-172 OPEN BOOK EXAMINATION Apr Total usable fuel capacity for the aircraft with long range tanks is:

DGINT/2. Flammability Reduction. Fuel tank safety. Purpose of the meeting. Review of conclusions from June 2004 workshop. Flammability Reduction

Accident Prevention Program

Transcription:

AIAA Foundation Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Competition RFP: Cruise Missile Carrier

1999/2000 AIAA FOUNDATION Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Competition I. RULES 1. All groups of three to ten undergraduate AIAA branch or at-large Student Members are eligible and encouraged to participate. 2. Six copies of the design will be submitted; each must bear the signatures, names and student numbers of the project leader and the AIAA Student Members who are participating. Designs that are submitted must be the work of the students, but guidance may come from the Faculty Advisor and should be accurately referenced and acknowledged. 3. Design projects that are used as part of organized classroom requirement are eligible and encouraged for competition. 4. The prizes shall be: First place-$2,500; Second place-$1,500; Third place-$1,000; with the awards for the students submitting the winning designs. Certificates will be presented to the winning design team for display at their university and a certificate will also be presented to each team member and the faculty project advisor. One representative from the first place design team will be expected to present a summary design paper at the AIAA World Aviation Conference in 2001. Reasonable airfare and lodging will be defrayed by the AIAA Foundation for the team representative. 5. More than one design may be submitted from students at any one school. Projects should be no more than 100 double-spaced typewritten pages and typeset should be no smaller than 10pt Times (including graphs, drawings, photographs, and appendix) on 8.5 x 11.0 paper. Up to five of the 100 pages may be foldouts (11 x 22 max). 6. If a design group withdraws their project from the competition, the team chairman must notify the AIAA National Office immediately! II. SCHEDULE AND ACTIVITY SEQUENCES Significant activities, dates and addresses for submission of proposal and related materials are as follows: A. Letter of Intent 10 March 2000 B. Receipt of Proposal 4 June 2000 C. Announcement of Winners September 2000 Groups intending to submit a proposal must submit a letter of intent (Item A), with a maximum length of one page to be received with the attached form on or before the date specified above, at the following address: Mr. Robert Paczula AIAA Student Programs 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Suite 500 Reston, VA 20191-4344 The finished proposal must be submitted (postmarked) to the same address, on or before the date specified for the Receipt of Proposal (Item B). III. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS The technical proposal is the most important factor in the award of a contract. It should be specific and complete. While it is realized that all of the technical factors cannot be included in advance, the following should be included and keyed accordingly: 1. Demonstrate a thorough understanding of the Request for Proposal (RFP) requirements. 2. Describe the proposed technical approaches to comply with each of the requirements specified in the RFP, including phasing of tasks. Legibility, clarity, and completeness of the technical approach are primary factors in evaluation of the proposals.

3. Particular emphasis should be directed at identification of critical, technical problem areas. Descriptions, sketches, drawings, systems analysis, method of attack, and discussions of new techniques should be presented in sufficient detail to permit engineering evaluation of the proposal. Exceptions to proposed technical requirements should be identified and explained. 4. Include tradeoff studies performed to arrive at the final design. 5. Provide a description of automated design tools used to develop the design. IV. BASIS FOR JUDGING 1. Technical Content (35 points) This concerns the correctness of theory, validity of reasoning used, apparent understanding and grasp of the subject, etc. Are all major factors considered and a reasonably accurate evaluation of these factors presented? 2. Organization and Presentation (20 points) The description of the design as an instrument of communication is a strong factor on judging. Organization of written design, clarity, and inclusion of pertinent information are major factors. 3. Originality (20 points) The design proposal should avoid standard textbook information, and should show the independence of thinking or a fresh approach to the project. Does the method and treatment of the problem show imagination? Does the method show an adaptation or creation of automated design tools? 4. Practical Application and Feasibility (25 points) The proposal should present conclusions or recommendations that are feasible and practical, and not merely lead the evaluators into further difficult or insolvable problems. Is the project realistic from a cost standpoint? Does the presentation include environmental impact studies (where applicable), and analysis of the function of the design in or for society? REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Design of a Cruise Missile Carrier for the 1999/2000 AIAA Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design I. OPPORTUNITY DESCRIPTION Recent events point to a need for a new Cruise Missile Carrier aircraft to respond to rapidly changing situations. To be viable, this aircraft must be capable of carrying at least ten AGM-86C Conventional Cruise Missiles for a total unrefueled range of 5,000 nautical miles. Due to the increasingly tight Defense budgets, these aircraft should be designed to keep both acquisition and life cycle costs as low as possible. With this in mind, civil cargo and passenger variants should be investigated, as well as the possible benefits of unmanned operation. 2. PROJECT OBJECTIVE 2.1 Overall Objectives The objective of this project is to design a new military aircraft that is capable of transporting and launching 10 AGM-86C missiles economically. Key elements of this project are to determine a means of establishing the cost effectiveness of the proposed aircraft and to investigate alternate payloads and mission ranges. The proposal will include a set of aircraft technologies incorporated into the design that are direct contributors in reducing costs. 3. DESIGN REQUIREMENTS AND CON- STRAINTS 3.1 General Design Requirements 1) The maximum landing weight equal to the 60% of maximum takeoff gross weight. 2) The aircraft shall be designed for a structural limit load factor of 2.5 g's.

3) Initial cruise ceiling of 30,000 feet at a cruise Mach Number no less than 0.85. 4) Maximum cruise altitude shall not be greater than 45,000 feet. 5) Design payload is ten AGM-86C missiles (~35,000 pounds). 6) Mission range is to be at least 5,000 nautical miles, unrefueled. 7) The aircraft will be compatible with current military and FAA airport operation requirements. 8) Military version of this aircraft will be capable of aerial refueling for extended range operations. 9) The general characteristics of the AGM-86C are listed below: Primary Function: missile Length: Weight: Diameter: Wingspan: 3.2 Requirements 3.2.1 Design Mission Air-to-ground strategic cruise 20 feet 9 inches 3,250 pounds 24.5 inches 12 feet Takeoff at maximum takeoff gross weight. 1. Warm-up and takeoff The fuel allowance should be equal to: a) fuel consumed during a 20 minute period of engine operation at idle power plus b) 2 minutes of operation at maximum takeoff power. 2. Climb at maximum climb power and best climb speed from SL to best long-range cruise altitude (not a cruise climb). 3. Cruise at best long-range cruise altitude and Mach number to a launch point 4,000 nautical miles from takeoff. 4. Loiter at best loiter altitude Mach number for 30 minutes. 5. Launch payload. 6. Climb at maximum climb power and best climb speed to best cruise altitude. 7. Cruise at best cruise altitude and Mach number to a field 1,000 NM from launch point. 8. Landing. Descend to landing field with no fuel, time or distance credit. 9. Reserve fuel is to be 5 percent of total mission fuel. 3.2.2 Point Performance Requirements The proposed aircraft shall satisfy the following Point Performance Requirements: 1. Cruise speed equal to or greater than Mach 0.85. 2. Minimum cruise ceiling equal to 30,000 feet at initial cruise speed. 3. Balanced field length at maximum TOGW shall be less than or equal to 8,000 feet, at sea level for an ICAO Std. Day. 4. Landing distance over 50 ft obstacle at maximum landing weight shall be less than or equal to 8,000 feet, at sea level, with one engine inoperative and an ICAO Std Day. 5. Landing distance over 50ft obstacle at end mission weight shall be less than or equal to 6000 feet, at sea level and an ICAO Std. Day. The aircraft shall also be capable of landing distance of 6800 feet at sea level on a USAF Tropical Day (89 degrees F and 14.7 psi). 4. Data Requirements The technical proposal must convincingly demonstrate that the proposer can provide a superior solution to the need identified by this request for proposal. Therefore, it is the most important factor in the award of a contract. The proposal should satisfy the following tasks to show how the proposer would develop the design of a new aircraft.

1. Justify the final design and describe in detail the technologies and technical approach used to meet the mission requirements. 2. Provide carpet plots used to optimize the final selected design. 3. Include a dimensioned 3-view general arrangement drawing. 4. Include an inboard profile showing the general internal arrangement for both a cruise missile carrier and a commercial cargo configurations. 5. Include an illustrated description of the primary load bearing airframe structure and state rationale for material selection. 6. Include a V-n diagram. 7. Show an estimated drag build up for the cruise configuration. 8. Show a weight breakdown of major components and systems, and center of gravity travel. 9. Provide performance estimates and demonstrate aircraft stability for all flight and loading conditions. 10. Provide fly-away cost for a production run of 600 aircraft.

Intent Form 1999/2000 AIAA FOUNDATION Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Competition Request for Proposal: Cruise Missile Carrier Title of Design Proposal: Name of School: Designer s Name AIAA Member Number Graduation Date Degree Team Leader Team Leader s E-mail In order to be eligible for the 1999/2000 AIAA FOUNDATION Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Competition, you must complete this form and return it to the AIAA Director of Student Programs before 10 March 2000, at AIAA Headquarters, along with a one-page Letter of Intent as noted in Section II, Schedules and Activity Sequences. For any nonmember listed above, a student member application and member dues payment should also be included with this form. Signature of Faculty Advisor Signature of Project Advisor