ASTM E 1354 Caloric Content Determination of "3M Polyurethane Adhesive Sealant 540"

Similar documents
REPORT NUMBER: MID-001 ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE: Sept 27, 2013 REVISED DATE: NA

FIRE TEST REPORT FH 5728

Comparison of Styropor and Neopor Expanded Polystyrene Foam Insulations HAI Project No. 1JJB

FIRE TEST REPORT FH 5078

FIRE TEST REPORT FH 5154

Oxygen Bomb Calorimeter

Test report no

Urban Wildfire Interface: Exterior Wall Wildfire Testing

TEST REPORT UL Fire test for Heat and Visible Smoke Release for Discrete Products and Their Accessories Installed in Air-Handling Spaces

CAST PIPE FITTINGS COUPLINGS

NFPA 286 STANDARD METHODS OF FIRE TESTS FOR EVALUATING CONTRIBUTION OF WALL AND CEILING INTERIOR FINISH TO ROOM FIRE GROWTH

3.1 Air Pollution Control Officer (APCO): as defined in Rule 1020 (Definitions).

RULE 4352 SOLID FUEL FIRED BOILERS, STEAM GENERATORS AND PROCESS HEATERS (Adopted September 14, 1994; Amended October 19, 1995; Amended May 18, 2006)

CHAPTER 8 EFFECTS OF COMBUSTION CHAMBER GEOMETRIES

BULDER 00 ROOMHEATER

An Explosive Situation. Definitions

The Advanced Rechargeable & Lithium Batteries Association Li-batteries hazards classification

EU Mutual Recognition Technical Requirements

BF2RA. Low Temperature Ignition of Biomass Jenny Jones, Alan Williams, Abby Saddawi Ben Dooley, Eddie Mitchell, Joanna Werner, Steve Chilton

Module 3: Influence of Engine Design and Operating Parameters on Emissions Lecture 14:Effect of SI Engine Design and Operating Variables on Emissions

Zürich Testing on Fuel Effects and Future Work Programme

SINGLE SLIDING WINDOW 1000 SERIES 4-1/2" FRAME SINGLE SLIDER LIFT OUT

TEST REPORT. Rendered to: HOMELAND VINYL PRODUCTS, INC. For: PVC Guardrail System Utilizing New Nylon/PVC Rail Mounting Bracket

Test Report No.: SDHGR FM Date: Jun.08, 2012 Page 1 of 3

SOLID CONSTRUCTION PTFE STEP FACE GASKETS FOR IMPROVED SEALING PERFORMANCE IN MONDI PIPING

GROUP WORKING WORKING PAPER. International FIRST MEETING. related tests SUMMARY. 1.1 independent. The DGP also may 1.2. The report, strategies. 1.

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

CERTIFICATE OF ACCREDITATION

THERMOELECTRIC SAMPLE CONDITIONER SYSTEM (TESC)

Exhaust and Downwash Technical Memoranda

SECTION ARCHITECTURAL WINDOW FILM. For best results, display hidden notes to specifier by clicking TOOLS / OPTIONS / VIEW / HIDDEN TEXT

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

MORPHOLOGY AND VOLATILITY OF PARTICULATE MATTER EMITTED FROM TWO DIRECT-INJECTION ENGINES

Multi-Sector Air Pollutants Regulations (MSAPR) May 2017

Assignment-1 Air Standard Cycles

GM Specification Annual Test Data

Vehicular modal emission and fuel consumption factors in Hong Kong

Assignment-1 Introduction

EASA Update. ARSA Symposium, Washington DC. 20 March Karl SPECHT

GM Specification Annual Test Data

Simple Finite Heat Release Model (SI Engine)

Physical Properties of Window Films

ASTM D Standard Specification for Biodiesel Fuel (B 100) Blend Stock for Distillate Fuels

University Turbine Systems Research Industrial Fellowship. Southwest Research Institute

Bomb Calorimeter System

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Potentials of higher alcoholes and oxygenates for engine application

1996, or for which modification is commenced on or before March 16, 1998, shall not exceed the

Product Evaluation Report

nvpm Measurements at Rolls-Royce

2. Discuss the effects of the following operating variables on detonation

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

The Influence of Fuel Cetane Number on Catalyst Light-Off Operation in a Modern Diesel Engine

This Part applies to the emissions of visible pollutants from compression ignition engined (diesel) vehicles, effective from 1st April 1991.

This is a new permit condition titled, "2D.1111 Subpart ZZZZ, Part 63 (Existing Non-Emergency nonblack start CI > 500 brake HP)"

Laboratory Report. U. S. Department of Justice

832 Series: Sulfur/Carbon Analysis by Combustion

Roofing Tests for European Roofing Products ENV 1187 Test 1, 2, 3 and 4

Explosion Characteristics Measurement of Combustible Dusts

ESCORT LC Pump. Instruction Manual WARNING

Standard Diesel & FCC Additive Technical Analysis on Lubricity

PATENTED TECHNOLOGY» PROVEN RESULTS» PAYBACK

NO X EMISSIONS FROM HEAVY FUEL OIL BOILERS

CLASSIFICATION NOTES. Type Testing Procedure for. Crankcase Explosion Relief Valves

Test Report No

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

The Fuel Consumption Study on E85 with Conventional EFI Vehicle

Measurement Testing Plan and nvpm LTO Mass and Number Metric Development

A Kowalewicz Technical University of Radom, ul. Chrobrego 45, Radom, , Poland.

Vivek Pandey 1, V.K. Gupta 2 1,2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Technology, GBPUA&T, Pantnagar, India

Burn Characteristics of Visco Fuse

A Comparison of Boat Introduction and Direct Injection using the Thermo Scientific ipro 5000 Series Combustion Analyzer

Test Report No. AJHL FB Date: OCT.26, 2016 Page 1 of 6

Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures ~ Fuels & Lubricants

Describe Flame Arrestor Operation and Maintenance Human Development Consultants Ltd.

Monitoring Quick Guide 5

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE INFLUENCE OF ETHANOL AND AUTOMOTIVE GASOLINE BLENDS By

Applicable Requirements - NSPS Subpart JJJJ

E/ECE/324/Rev.2/Add.102/Rev.1 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2/Add.102/Rev.1

This is a repository copy of Particle Size Distribution During Pine Wood Combustion on a Cone Calorimeter.

PFI Standard Specification for Residential/Commercial Densified Fuel 18-June-2008

Sequence VH Report Forms Version Conducted For

ANALYSIS OF THE ENGINE FUELS IMPACT ON CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS

TEST REPORT No. : SHCCM Date : May. 17, 2013 Page: 1 of 5

Hazardous areas, as found around a service station, are classified into three zones as follow: Table 1: Zone Classification for Vapours

CONTROLLING COMBUSTION IN HCCI DIESEL ENGINES

Application Note Original Instructions Development of Gas Fuel Control Systems for Dry Low NOx (DLN) Aero-Derivative Gas Turbines

TEST REPORT No. : SHCCM Date : Mar. 12, 2013 Page: 1 of 5

Compatibility Between Electric Trains and Electrification Systems

2013 THERMAL ENGINEERING-I

Test Report No. AJHL FB Date: APR.06, 2016 Page 1 of 5

Agilent Solutions for the Analysis of Ethanol- Based Fuels Derived From Biomass. James D. McCurry, Ph.D. Senior Scientist

Page 2. (a) (i) Show that during the change AB the gas undergoes an isothermal change.

(2) An engine subject to this rule or specifically exempt by Subsection (b)(1) of this rule shall not be subject to Rule 68.

ASTM Standard for Hit/Miss POD Analysis

Generator Efficiency Optimization at Remote Sites

Feedstock. Guide page 41. Home. Feedstock for the complete set of guidance please visit 1.

Exercise 3. Battery Charging Fundamentals EXERCISE OBJECTIVE DISCUSSION OUTLINE DISCUSSION. Charging fundamentals

HYDROGEN TEST CELLS. T. Wallner, R. Scarcelli, H. Lohse-Busch, B. Wozny. S. Miers Michigan Technological University. September 16 18, 2009

Problem 1 (ECU Priority)

Transcription:

ELECTRONIC COPY ASTM E 1354 Caloric Content Determination of "3M Polyurethane Adhesive Sealant 540" A Report To: 3M Center Industrial and Transportation Division 3M Center, Building 223-1N-14 St, Paul, MN 55144 USA Phone: (651) 733-8456 Email: hcertain@mmm.com Attention: Harry Certain Submitted By: Fire Testing Report No. 11-002-639(A2) 8 pages + 1 appendix Date: October 18, 2011

ASTM E 1354 Testing of "3M 540 Polyurethane Sealant" Page 2 of 8 ACCREDITATION To ISO/IEC 17025 for a defined Scope of Testing by the International Accreditation Service SPECIFICATIONS OF ORDER Determine Effective Heat of Combustion according to ASTM E 1354 and derive Caloric Content, as per your Purchase Order No. USMMM8U18T and our Quote No. 11-006-08170 RV1 dated September 21, 2011. IDENTIFICATION Polyurethane sealant identified as "3M Polyurethane Adhesive Sealant 540". ( sample identification number 11-002-S0639-1) SAMPLE PREPARATION The coating material was applied onto 6 mm thick fiberglass reinforced cement substrate using a 1/32 x 1/32" square notched trowel and was allowed to dry 48 hours prior to testing. SUMMARY OF TEST PROCEDURE Each specimen is mounted into a holder and placed horizontally below a cone-shaped radiant heat source which has been previously calibrated to emit a predetermined heat flux. Testing can occur with or without a spark ignition source. The test is performed in ambient air conditions, while a load cell continuously monitors specimen weight loss. Exhaust gas flow rate and oxygen concentration are used to determine the amount of heat release, based on the observation that the net heat of combustion is directly related to the amount of oxygen required for combustion. The relationship is that approximately 13.1 x 10³ kj of heat are released per 1 kg of oxygen consumed. In addition to rate of heat release, other specified measurements include mass-loss rate, time to sustained flaming and smoke obscuration.

ASTM E 1354 Testing of "3M 540 Polyurethane Sealant" Page 3 of 8 TEST RESULTS ASTM E 1354-11 Standard Test Method for Heat and Visible Smoke Release Rates for Materials and Products Using an Oxygen Consumption Calorimeter Testing was performed on October 12, 2011 with the sample in the horizontal configuration, utilizing the specimen edge frame and also the specified spark ignition source. Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 Average Heat Flux (kw/m²) 50 50 50 Exhaust Flow Rate (l/s) 24 24 24 Specimen Thickness (mm) 0.1 0.1 0.1 Initial Mass (g) 88.5 89.6 89.9 Mass at Sustained Flaming (g) 89.3 89.0 89.9 Final Mass (g) 80.12 78.66 78.42 Total Mass Loss (kg/m²) 0.84 1.10 1.15 1.03 Peak Specific Mass Loss Rate (g/s m²) 20.82 21.66 17.05 19.84 Average Mass Loss Rate (g/s m²) 6.20 7.92 8.03 7.39 Time to Ignition (s) 32 18 19 23 Time to Flame-out (s) 101 118 135 118 Time of Peak Rate of Heat Release (s) 45 25 40 37 Peak Rate of Heat Release (kw/m²) 175.7 195.6 225.8 199.0 Average Rate of Heat Release (kw/m²) 46.8 73.7 61.8 60.8 Total Heat Released (MJ/m²) 7.34 7.63 7.75 7.57 Average Effective Heat of Combustion (MJ/kg) 7.68 10.19 9.13 9.00 Average Effective Heat of Combustion (BTU/lb) 3307.5 4387.5 3932.4 3876 Caloric Content (MJ/kg) 0.73 0.75 0.76 0.75 Caloric Content (BTU/lb) 315.63 323.97 328.04 323 * * ** ** Peak Extinction Area (m²/kg) 451.4 681.3 649.4 594.0 Average Extinction Area (m²/kg) 85.0 178.8 212.9 158.9 * Total heat produced per unit mass of material consumed ** Total heat produced per unit mass of material tested

ASTM E 1354 Testing of "3M Polyurethane Adhesive Sealant 540" Page 4 of 8 TEST RESULTS (continued) 100 EFFECTIVE HEAT OF COMBUSTION ASTM E 1354 90 Test #1 Test #2 80 Test #3 70 60 (MJ/kg) 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 TIME (seconds) Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 Average Average Heat of Combustion (MJ/kg)* 7.68 10.19 9.13 9.00 Heat of Combustion @ 60 s (MJ/kg)** 8.73 12.01 11.32 10.69 Heat of Combustion @ 180 s (MJ/kg)** 0.00 9.41 7.72 5.71 Heat of Combustion @ 300 s (MJ/kg)** 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 * Averaged over the period starting when 10% of the ultimate mass loss occurred and ending at the time when 90% of the ultimate mass loss occurred. ** Averages, or projected averages over the 60, 180 or 300 second periods starting when 10% of the ultimate mass loss occurred.

ASTM E 1354 Testing of "3M Polyurethane Adhesive Sealant 540" Page 5 of 8 TEST RESULTS (continued) 250 225 200 RATE OF HEAT RELEASE ASTM E 1354 Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 175 150 (kw/m²) 125 100 75 50 25 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 TIME (seconds) Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 Average Peak Rate of Heat Release (kw/m²) 175.7 195.6 225.8 199.0 Average Heat Release Rate (kw/m²)* 46.8 73.7 61.8 60.8 Heat Release Rate @ 60 s (kw/m²)** 84.2 102.2 100.0 95.5 Heat Release Rate @ 180 s (kw/m²)** 0.0 51.6 47.2 32.9 Heat Release Rate @ 300 s (kw/m²)** 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 * Averaged over the test period (from ignition to flameout). ** Averages, or projected averages over the first 60, 180 or 300 seconds after ignition.

ASTM E 1354 Testing of "3M Polyurethane Adhesive Sealant 540" Page 6 of 8 TEST RESULTS (continued) SMOKE GENERATION ASTM E 1354 1000 2.0 Test #1 Test #2 800 Test #3 1.6 Extinction Area (m²/kg) 600 1.2 400 0.8 Total Smoke (m²) 200 0.4 0 0.0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 TIME (seconds) Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 Average Peak Extinction Area (m²/kg) 451.4 681.3 649.4 594.0 Average Extinction Area (m²/kg)* 85.0 178.8 212.9 158.9 Extinction Area @ 60 s (m²/kg)** 115.6 242.7 313.9 224.1 Extinction Area @ 180 s (m²/kg)** 0.0 138.8 164.4 101.1 Extinction Area @ 300 s (m²/kg)** 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Smoke (m²) 0.9 1.4 1.6 1.3 * Averaged over the test period (from ignition to flameout). ** Averages, or projected averages over the first 60, 180 or 300 seconds after ignition.

ASTM E 1354 Testing of "3M Polyurethane Adhesive Sealant 540" Page 7 of 8 TEST RESULTS (continued) 100 90 80 MASS LOSS RATE ASTM E 1354 Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 Specific Mass Loss Rate (g/s m²) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 Time (seconds) Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 Average Peak Mass Loss Rate (g/s m²) 20.82 21.66 17.05 19.84 Avg. Specific Mass Loss Rate (g/m² s)* 6.20 7.92 8.03 7.39 Mass Loss Rate @ 60 s (g/s)** 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.08 Mass Loss Rate @ 180 s (g/s)** 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.03 Mass Loss Rate @ 300 s (g/s)** 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 * Averaged over the period starting when 10% of the ultimate mass loss occurred and ending at the time when 90% of the ultimate mass loss occurred. ** Averages, or projected averages over the 60, 180 or 300 second periods starting when 10% of the ultimate mass loss occurred.

ASTM E 1354 Testing of "3M Polyurethane Adhesive Sealant 540 Page 8 of 8 CONCLUSIONS The polyurethane sealant identified in this report, when tested applied onto 6 mm thick fiberglass reinforced cement substrate, affords an average Effective Heat of Combustion of 9.0 MJ/kg (3876 BTU/lb) of consumed material when tested according to ASTM E 1354 at an imposed heat flux of 50 kw/m². Based on the initial mass of each specimen, this calculates to an overall average Caloric Content of 0.75 MJ/kg (323 BTU/lb). Note: This is an electronic copy of the report. Signatures are on file with the original report. Mel Garces, Fire Testing. Ian Smith, Fire Testing. Note: This report and service are covered under Canada Inc. Standard Terms and Conditions of Contract which may be found on the website (www.exova.com), or by calling 1-866-263-9268.

ASTM E 1354 Testing of "3M Polyurethane Adhesive Sealant 540 APPENDIX (1 Page) ASTM E 1354 Definitions

ASTM E 1354 DEFINITIONS In evaluating the data produced by the oxygen consumption (cone) calorimeter, the following definitions and comments are offered: Effective Heat of Combustion This is the measured heat release divided by the mass loss for a specified time period and represents, therefore, the calorific value of the consumed portion only of the tested material. Caloric content under the test conditions can be derived by dividing the total heat released by the original mass of the material under test. It generally differs from the theoretical heat of combustion, since the latter involves complete combustion - a phenomenon which rarely takes place in an actual fire. Time to Ignition Also known as ignition delay time, this parameter provides a measure of a material's propensity to ignition as measured by the time to sustained ignition at a given heat flux. It can also be considered to be related to the volatility of the degradation products and the time required to achieve a critical fuel concentration in the vapour phase. This gasification rate is temperature dependent: the higher the imposed heat flux the shorter the time to ignition. Heat Release Rate (HRR) HRR is the heat evolved per unit time and is highly dependent on applied heat flux: the higher the flux the greater the HRR. HRR curves can fluctuate significantly with time and it is generally considered that the average HRR can be a better predictor of full-scale fire performance than the peak value. Total Heat Release This is the integrated area under the HRR curve over the test period, expressed in MJ/m³. If one knows the surface area of a material used in a room or transit vehicle, this value is more properly used to estimate "potential heat load" than is the more commonly used "caloric content" based upon the weight of material used. Mass Loss Rate This is roughly correlatable with heat release rate because it is the rate at which the test material is degraded to produce combustible fuels. The peak mass loss rate and average mass loss rate are derivative terms generated by the load cell. Extinction Area This refers to the "yield" of smoke which is, through mathematical manipulation, expressed as an area per unit mass. In addition to average values for the test, data averaged to the 60, 180 and 300 second marks after ignition are also typically provided. Where materials burn for different lengths of time, for example, it is more technically sound to compare the average heat release rates over the first 1, 3 or 5 minutes of burning than to compare the test average results which encompass differing time periods.