Lampiran IV. Hasil Output SPSS Versi 16.0 untuk Analisis Deskriptif

Similar documents
Lampiran 1. Data Perusahaan

TRY OUT 30 Responden Variabel Kompetensi/ x1

HASIL OUTPUT SPSS. Reliability Scale: ALL VARIABLES

UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILIAS VARIABEL KOMPENSASI

DATA SAMPEL TAHUN 2006

TRY OUT 25 Responden Variabel Kepuasan / x1

. Enter. Model Summary b. Std. Error. of the. Estimate. Change. a. Predictors: (Constant), Emphaty, reliability, Assurance, responsive, Tangible

Daftar Sampel Perusahaan

LAMPIRAN DAFTAR SAMPEL PENELITIAN. Kriteria No. Nama Perusahaan. Sampel Emiten

LAMPIRAN 1. Lampiran Nama dan Kondisi Perusahaan Textile No Kode Nama Perusahaan Hasil z-score FD Non-FD

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION, SUGGESTION AND LIMITATION. 1. Independent commissioner boards proportion does not negatively affect

Daftar Sampel Perusahaan Pertambangan. 4 BORN Borneo Lumbung Energy & Metal, Tbk

fruitfly fecundity example summary Tuesday, July 17, :13:19 PM 1

Rata-Rata Nilai Debt to Equity Ratio (DER) Perusahaan Otomotif yang 0, ,97 0, ,44 1,9 1,6 1,4 1,7 1,65

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Lampiran i Jadwal Penelitian

Lampiran 1. Daftar Sampel Perusahaan

DATA PENELITIAN 1. CAR CAR (%)

LAMPIRAN I FORMULIR SURVEI

LAMPIRAN I Data Perusahaan Sampel kode DPS EPS Ekuitas akpi ,97 51,04 40,

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran 1 Data Sampel Penelitian

EXST7034 Multiple Regression Geaghan Chapter 11 Bootstrapping (Toluca example) Page 1

Data Nama Perusahaan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di BEI.

Industry Classification/Stock Name

Daftar Perusahaan Real Estate dan Property

Team project 2017 Dony Pratidana S. Hum Bima Agus Setyawan S. IIP

Lampiran 1 DAFTAR PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA TAHUN (Menyajikan Laporan Keuangan Secara Berturut-turut)

Perusahaan Consumer Goods yang Terdaftar di BEI ( ) Nama Perusahaan Perusahaan 1

LAMPIRAN A. Tabulasi Data Perusahaan Sample

a. Uji kenormalan data model sebaran suhu pada band 7 citra tahun 2001 b. Uji kenormalan data model sebaran suhu pada band 4 citra tahun 2006

MODUL PELATIHAN SEM ANANDA SABIL HUSSEIN, PHD

Guatemalan cholesterol example summary

Daftar Nama Perusaahan. yang ada di Industri Consumer Goods periode

LAMPIRAN 1 : DAFTAR PERUSAHAAN SAMPEL PERIODE

Lampiran 1. Uji Validitas dan Reliability Variabel Kualitas Pelayanan

APPENDIX A. A.1 Sample of Indian MFIs

: ( .

LAMPIRAN UJI VALIDITAS

Regression Models Course Project, 2016

Daftar Nama Perusahaan Sampel Tahun 2010

Getting Started with Correlated Component Regression (CCR) in XLSTAT-CCR

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran I. Daftar Populasi Perusahaan Properti dan Real Estate di Bursa Efek Indonesia No Kode. Kriteria Nama Perusahaan Emiten 1 2 3

Lampiran 1 Tabel 3.1 Sampel No. Kode Nama Perusahaan Sumber : didownload tanggal 13 November 2016 (data diolah)

Drilling Example: Diagnostic Plots

Lampiran 1. Proses Pemilihan Sampel. Universitas Sumatera Utara

The PRINCOMP Procedure

Lampiran 1. Tabel Sampel Penelitian

Motor Trend MPG Analysis

Cluster Analysis. Presented by: Lauren Franklin and Maria Bakarman COM 631. April 2017

Lampiran 1 Daftar Perusahaan Sampel 2012

MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENT MODEL ON THE ROAD SECTION OF HIGHLANDS REGION BY USING GENELARIZED LINEAR MODEL

Modeling Ignition Delay in a Diesel Engine

tool<-read.csv(file="d:/chilo/regression 7/tool.csv", header=t) tool

Motor Trend Yvette Winton September 1, 2016

Lampiran 1: Nama Perusahaan yang menjadi Sampel Penelitian

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran 1. Data deviden untuk menghitung economic performance tahun

5. CONSTRUCTION OF THE WEIGHT-FOR-LENGTH AND WEIGHT-FOR- HEIGHT STANDARDS

LAMPIRAN 1. Tabel 1. Data Indeks Harga Saham PT. ANTAM, tbk Periode 20 Januari Februari 2012

Technical Papers supporting SAP 2009

EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS ON ROAD TRAFFIC CRASHES IN ANAMBRA STATE, NIGERIA: ACCIDENT PREDICTION MODELING USING REGRESSION APPROACH

Stat 301 Lecture 30. Model Selection. Explanatory Variables. A Good Model. Response: Highway MPG Explanatory: 13 explanatory variables

LAMPIRAN. Daftar Perusahaan Manufaktur yang menjadi sampel. 1 AMFG PT.Asahimas Flat Glass Tbk 1. 2 INDF PT. Indofood Skses Makmur Tbk 2

Análisis de la varianza (II)

Important Formulas. Discrete Probability Distributions. Probability and Counting Rules. The Normal Distribution. Confidence Intervals and Sample Size

Antonio Olmos Priyalatha Govindasamy Research Methods & Statistics University of Denver

Lampiran 1. Penjualan PT Honda Mandiri Bogor

Statistics for Social Research

TABLE 4.1 POPULATION OF 100 VALUES 2

Level of service model for exclusive motorcycle lane

LAMPIRAN 1 Perusahaan Sampel Penelitian Tahun

KUESIONER PENELITIAN BAGIAN 1

DEFECT DISTRIBUTION IN WELDS OF INCOLOY 908

Stat 401 B Lecture 31

Forecasting Driving Behavior to Enable Efficient Grid Integration of Plug-in Electric Vehicles

Descriptive Statistics

Ulangan (%) I II III

Oregon DOT Slow-Speed Weigh-in-Motion (SWIM) Project: Analysis of Initial Weight Data

Start Time. LOCATION: Scotts Valley Dr QC JOB #: SPECIFIC LOCATION: 0 ft from Tabor St. DIRECTION: EB/WB CITY/STATE: Scotts Valley, CA

1 of 28 9/15/2016 1:16 PM

Booklet of Code and Output for STAD29/STA 1007 Final Exam

Preface... xi. A Word to the Practitioner... xi The Organization of the Book... xi Required Software... xii Accessing the Supplementary Content...

Statistics and Quantitative Analysis U4320. Segment 8 Prof. Sharyn O Halloran

R-Sq criterion Data : Surgical room data Chap 9

Road Surface characteristics and traffic accident rates on New Zealand s state highway network

The Session.. Rosaria Silipo Phil Winters KNIME KNIME.com AG. All Right Reserved.

Lampiran 1. Daftar Perusahaan Sampel. No Kode Nama Perusahaan

female male help("predict") yhat age

Review of Upstate Load Forecast Uncertainty Model

THERMOELECTRIC SAMPLE CONDITIONER SYSTEM (TESC)

Improving CERs building

The purpose of this experiment was to determine if current speed limit postings are

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Data Hasil Olahan Populasi

Effect of Sample Size and Method of Sampling Pig Weights on the Accuracy of Estimating the Mean Weight of the Population 1

FINAL REPORT AP STATISTICS CLASS DIESEL TRUCK COUNT PROJECT

Quality Control in Mineral Exploration

Descriptive Statistics Practice Problems (99-04)

namibia UniVERSITY OF SCIEnCE AnD TECHnOLOGY FACULTY OF HEALTH AND APPLIED SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS MARKS: 100

Sharif University of Technology. Graduate School of Management and Economics. Econometrics I. Fall Seyed Mahdi Barakchian

Author s Accepted Manuscript

Transcription:

182 Lampiran IV. Hasil Output SPSS Versi 16.0 untuk Analisis Deskriptif Frequencies Statistics Kinerja Guru Sikap Guru Thdp Kepsek Motivasi Kerja Guru Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru N Valid 64 64 64 64 Missing 0 0 0 0 Mean 98.20 108.31 60.25 136.09 Std. Error of Mean 1.60 1.57 1.24 1.68 Median 97.00 106.50 61.00 135.00 Mode 85 a 96 a 64 135 Std. Deviation 12.840 12.592 9.924 13.456 Variance 164.863 158.567 98.476 181.070 Skewness.551.128 -.134.061 Std. Error of Skewness.299.299.299.299 Kurtosis.087 -.767 -.313 -.397 Std. Error of Kurtosis.590.590.590.590 Range 61 51 45 60 Minimum 74 81 38 105 Maximum 135 132 83 165 Sum 6285 6932 3856 8710 Percentiles 10 82.00 92.50 46.00 118.50 20 86.00 96.00 52.00 124.00 30 91.00 100.50 55.00 129.00 40 93.00 105.00 58.00 133.00 50 97.00 106.50 61.00 135.00 60 101.00 110.00 64.00 139.00 70 103.00 115.50 65.00 144.00 80 110.00 121.00 69.00 148.00 90 116.50 127.50 72.50 154.50 a. Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is shown

183 Frequency Table Kinerja Guru Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 74 1 1.6 1.6 1.6 78 1 1.6 1.6 3.1 80 3 4.7 4.7 7.8 82 2 3.1 3.1 10.9 83 1 1.6 1.6 12.5 85 4 6.2 6.2 18.8 86 1 1.6 1.6 20.3 88 3 4.7 4.7 25.0 90 1 1.6 1.6 26.6 91 4 6.2 6.2 32.8 92 2 3.1 3.1 35.9 93 3 4.7 4.7 40.6 95 4 6.2 6.2 46.9 96 1 1.6 1.6 48.4 97 2 3.1 3.1 51.6 98 1 1.6 1.6 53.1 99 3 4.7 4.7 57.8 100 1 1.6 1.6 59.4 101 3 4.7 4.7 64.1 102 3 4.7 4.7 68.8 103 2 3.1 3.1 71.9 105 4 6.2 6.2 78.1 106 1 1.6 1.6 79.7 110 1 1.6 1.6 81.2 113 4 6.2 6.2 87.5 114 1 1.6 1.6 89.1 116 1 1.6 1.6 90.6 117 1 1.6 1.6 92.2 118 1 1.6 1.6 93.8 121 1 1.6 1.6 95.3 124 1 1.6 1.6 96.9 126 1 1.6 1.6 98.4 135 1 1.6 1.6 100.0 Total 64 100.0 100.0

184 Sikap Guru Thdp Kepsek Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 81 1 1.6 1.6 1.6 86 1 1.6 1.6 3.1 88 1 1.6 1.6 4.7 89 1 1.6 1.6 6.2 92 2 3.1 3.1 9.4 93 1 1.6 1.6 10.9 94 1 1.6 1.6 12.5 95 2 3.1 3.1 15.6 96 4 6.2 6.2 21.9 97 1 1.6 1.6 23.4 99 1 1.6 1.6 25.0 100 3 4.7 4.7 29.7 101 3 4.7 4.7 34.4 102 2 3.1 3.1 37.5 104 1 1.6 1.6 39.1 105 4 6.2 6.2 45.3 106 3 4.7 4.7 50.0 107 1 1.6 1.6 51.6 108 1 1.6 1.6 53.1 109 2 3.1 3.1 56.2 110 3 4.7 4.7 60.9 112 1 1.6 1.6 62.5 113 2 3.1 3.1 65.6 114 2 3.1 3.1 68.8 115 1 1.6 1.6 70.3 116 2 3.1 3.1 73.4 118 3 4.7 4.7 78.1 121 2 3.1 3.1 81.2 123 2 3.1 3.1 84.4 124 2 3.1 3.1 87.5 125 1 1.6 1.6 89.1 127 1 1.6 1.6 90.6 128 1 1.6 1.6 92.2 129 2 3.1 3.1 95.3 130 1 1.6 1.6 96.9 132 2 3.1 3.1 100.0 Total 64 100.0 100.0

185 Motivasi Kerja Guru Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 38 1 1.6 1.6 1.6 42 3 4.7 4.7 6.2 43 1 1.6 1.6 7.8 45 1 1.6 1.6 9.4 47 2 3.1 3.1 12.5 48 2 3.1 3.1 15.6 50 1 1.6 1.6 17.2 51 1 1.6 1.6 18.8 52 1 1.6 1.6 20.3 53 2 3.1 3.1 23.4 54 3 4.7 4.7 28.1 55 2 3.1 3.1 31.2 56 2 3.1 3.1 34.4 58 4 6.2 6.2 40.6 59 3 4.7 4.7 45.3 60 1 1.6 1.6 46.9 61 3 4.7 4.7 51.6 62 3 4.7 4.7 56.2 63 2 3.1 3.1 59.4 64 5 7.8 7.8 67.2 65 3 4.7 4.7 71.9 66 2 3.1 3.1 75.0 67 1 1.6 1.6 76.6 68 1 1.6 1.6 78.1 69 3 4.7 4.7 82.8 70 2 3.1 3.1 85.9 71 1 1.6 1.6 87.5 72 2 3.1 3.1 90.6 73 1 1.6 1.6 92.2 74 1 1.6 1.6 93.8 76 1 1.6 1.6 95.3 78 1 1.6 1.6 96.9 79 1 1.6 1.6 98.4 83 1 1.6 1.6 100.0 Total 64 100.0 100.0

186 Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 105 1 1.6 1.6 1.6 110 1 1.6 1.6 3.1 113 1 1.6 1.6 4.7 115 1 1.6 1.6 6.2 118 2 3.1 3.1 9.4 119 1 1.6 1.6 10.9 121 3 4.7 4.7 15.6 123 2 3.1 3.1 18.8 124 1 1.6 1.6 20.3 125 2 3.1 3.1 23.4 126 2 3.1 3.1 26.6 128 1 1.6 1.6 28.1 129 2 3.1 3.1 31.2 130 3 4.7 4.7 35.9 131 2 3.1 3.1 39.1 133 1 1.6 1.6 40.6 134 3 4.7 4.7 45.3 135 5 7.8 7.8 53.1 137 1 1.6 1.6 54.7 138 3 4.7 4.7 59.4 139 1 1.6 1.6 60.9 140 1 1.6 1.6 62.5 141 2 3.1 3.1 65.6 142 2 3.1 3.1 68.8 144 4 6.2 6.2 75.0 145 1 1.6 1.6 76.6 147 2 3.1 3.1 79.7 148 3 4.7 4.7 84.4 153 1 1.6 1.6 85.9 154 3 4.7 4.7 90.6 155 1 1.6 1.6 92.2 157 1 1.6 1.6 93.8 158 1 1.6 1.6 95.3 160 1 1.6 1.6 96.9 164 1 1.6 1.6 98.4 165 1 1.6 1.6 100.0 Total 64 100.0 100.0

Histogram 187

188

189 Lampiran V. Hasil Output SPSS Versi 16.0 untuk Uji Persyaratan Analisis(Uji Normalitas dan Homogenitas) Explore Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Kinerja Guru 64 100.0% 0.0% 64 100.0% Descriptives Statistic Std. Error Kinerja Guru Mean 98.20 1.605 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 95.00 Upper Bound 101.41 5% Trimmed Mean 97.70 Median 97.00 Variance 164.863 Std. Deviation 12.840 Minimum 74 Maximum 135 Range 61 Interquartile Range 16 Skewness.551.299 Kurtosis.087.590 Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov a Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. Kinerja Guru.080 64.200 *.975 64.209 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction *. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

190 Kinerja Guru Kinerja Guru Stem-and-Leaf Plot Frequency Stem & Leaf 2,00 7. 48 14,00 8. 00022355556888 21,00 9. 011112233355556778999 14,00 10. 01112223355556 9,00 11. 033334678 3,00 12. 146 1,00 Extremes (>=135) Stem width: 10 Each leaf: 1 case(s)

191

192 Explore Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Sikap Guru Thdp Kepsek 64 100.0% 0.0% 64 100.0% Descriptives Statistic Std. Error Sikap Guru Thdp Kepsek Mean 108.31 1.574 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 105.17 Upper Bound 111.46 5% Trimmed Mean 108.32 Median 106.50 Variance 158.567 Std. Deviation 12.592 Minimum 81 Maximum 132 Range 51.000 Interquartile Range 19 Skewness.128.299 Kurtosis -.767.590 Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov a Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. Sikap Guru Thdp Kepsek.073 64.200 *.977 64.287 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction *. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

193 Sikap Guru Thdp Kepsek Sikap Guru Thdp Kepsek Stem-and-Leaf Plot Frequency Stem & Leaf 4,00 8. 1689 12,00 9. 223455666679 20,00 10. 00011122455556667899 14,00 11. 00023344566888 11,00 12. 11334457899 3,00 13. 022 Stem width: 10 Each leaf: 1 case(s)

194

195 Explore Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Motivasi Kerja Guru 64 100.0% 0.0% 64 100.0% Descriptives Statistic Std. Error Motivasi Kerja Guru Mean 60.25 1.240 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 57.77 Upper Bound 62.73 5% Trimmed Mean 60.25 Median 61.00 Variance 98.476 Std. Deviation 9.924 Minimum 38 Maximum 83 Range 45 Interquartile Range 13 Skewness -.134.299 Kurtosis -.313.590 Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov a Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. Motivasi Kerja Guru.067 64.200 *.989 64.856 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction *. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

196 Motivasi Kerja Guru Motivasi Kerja Guru Stem-and-Leaf Plot Frequency Stem & Leaf 1,00 3. 8 9,00 4. 222357788 19,00 5. 0123344455668888999 24,00 6. 011122233444445556678999 10,00 7. 0012234689 1,00 8. 3 Stem width: 10 Each leaf: 1 case(s)

197

198 Explore Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru N Percent N Percent N Percent 64 100.0% 0.0% 64 100.0% Descriptives Statistic Std. Error Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Mean 136.09 1.682 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 132.73 Upper Bound 139.46 5% Trimmed Mean 136.08 Median 135.00 Variance 181.070 Std. Deviation 13.456 Minimum 105 Maximum 165 Range 60 Interquartile Range 19 Skewness.061.299 Kurtosis -.397.590 Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov a Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru.064 64.200 *.992 64.947 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction *. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

199 Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Stem-and-Leaf Plot Frequency Stem & Leaf 1,00 10. 5 6,00 11. 035889 13,00 12. 1113345566899 19,00 13. 0001134445555578889 15,00 14. 011224444577888 7,00 15. 3444578 3,00 16. 045 Stem width: 10 Each leaf: 1 case(s)

200

201 Oneway Test of Homogeneity of Variances Kinerja Guru Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig. 1.536 17 27.155 ANOVA Kinerja Guru Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 7487.026 35 213.915 2.066.026 Within Groups 2899.333 28 103.548 Total 10386.359 63 Test of Homogeneity of Variances Kinerja Guru Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig. 1.300 17 30.258 ANOVA Kinerja Guru Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 8240.471 33 249.711 3.374.001 Within Groups 2220.467 30 74.016 Total 10460.938 63 Test of Homogeneity of Variances Kinerja Guru Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig. 1.361 16 28.231 ANOVA Kinerja Guru Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 7391.904 35 211.197 1.927.039 Within Groups 3069.033 28 109.608 Total 10460.938 63

202 Lampiran VI. Hasil Output SPSS Versi 16.0 untuk Uji Hipotesis Penelitian Regression Variables Entered/Removed b Model Variables Entered 1 Sikap Guru Thdp Kepsek a a. All requested variables entered. Variables Removed. Enter Method b. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Guru Model R R Square Adjuste d R Square Model Summary b Std. Error of the Estimate Change Statistics R Square Change F Change df1 df2 Sig. F Change 1.533 a.284.273 10.950.284 24.625 1 62.000 a. Predictors: (Constant), Sikap Guru Thdp Kepsek b. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Guru ANOVA b Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 2952.535 1 2952.535 24.625.000 a Residual 7433.825 62 119.900 Total 10386.359 63 a. Predictors: (Constant), Sikap Guru Thdp Kepsek b. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Guru Coefficients a Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. 1 (Constant) 39.319 11.945 3.292.002 Sikap Guru Thdp Kepsek.544.110.533 4.962.000 a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Guru Residuals Statistics a Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation N Predicted Value 83.35 111.08 98.20 6.846 64 Residual -23.470 33.705.000 10.863 64 Std. Predicted Value -2.169 1.881.000 1.000 64 Std. Residual -2.143 3.078.000.992 64 a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Guru

203 Charts Regression Model Variables Entered/Removed b Variables Entered 1 Motivasi Kerja Guru a a. All requested variables entered. Variables Removed b. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Guru. Enter Method Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Model Summary b Std. Error of the Estimate R Square Change Change Statistics F Change df1 df2 Sig. F Change 1.635 a.403.393 10.039.403 4.181E1 1 62.000 a. Predictors: (Constant), Motivasi Kerja Guru b. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Guru

204 ANOVA b Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 4213.033 1 4213.033 41.807.000 a Residual 6247.905 62 100.773 Total 10460.938 63 a. Predictors: (Constant), Motivasi Kerja Guru b. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Guru Coefficients a Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. 1 (Constant) 147.869 7.781 19.005.000 Motivasi Kerja Guru a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Guru -.824.127 -.635-6.466.000 Residuals Statistics a Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation N Predicted Value 79.47 116.55 98.22 8.178 64 Residual -24.138 22.742.000 9.959 64 Std. Predicted Value -2.293 2.242.000 1.000 64 Std. Residual -2.404 2.265.000.992 64 a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Guru Charts

205 Regression Variables Entered/Removed b Model Variables Entered 1 Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru a a. All requested variables entered. Variables Removed. Enter Method b. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Guru Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Model Summary b Std. Error of the Estimate R Square Change Change Statistics F Change df1 df2 Sig. F Change 1.600 a.360.349 10.393.360 3.485E1 1 62.000 a. Predictors: (Constant), Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru b. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Guru ANOVA b Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 3764.010 1 3764.010 34.847.000 a Residual 6696.927 62 108.015 Total 10460.938 63 a. Predictors: (Constant), Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru b. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Guru Coefficients a Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. 1 (Constant) 20.043 13.307 1.506.137 Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Guru.574.097.600 5.903.000 Residuals Statistics a Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation N Predicted Value 80.36 114.82 98.22 7.730 64 Residual -20.463 28.070.000 10.310 64 Std. Predicted Value -2.311 2.148.000 1.000 64 Std. Residual -1.969 2.701.000.992 64 a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Guru

206 Charts Regression Variables Entered/Removed b Model Variables Entered 1 Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru, Motivasi Kerja Guru, Sikap Guru Thdp Kepsek a a. All requested variables entered. Variables Removed. Enter Method b. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Guru Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Model Summary b Std. Error of the Estimate R Square Change Change Statistics F Change df1 df2 Sig. F Change 1.755 a.569.548 8.634.569 2.645E1 3 60.000 a. Predictors: (Constant), Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru, Motivasi Kerja Guru, Sikap Guru Thdp Kepsek b. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Guru

207 ANOVA b Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 5914.070 3 1971.357 26.448.000 a Residual 4472.290 60 74.538 Total 10386.359 63 a. Predictors: (Constant), Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru, Motivasi Kerja Guru, Sikap Guru Thdp Kepsek b. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Guru Coefficients a Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. 1 (Constant) 63.979 18.677 3.426.001 Sikap Guru Thdp Kepsek.207.102.203 2.026.047 Motivasi Kerja Guru -.529.126 -.409-4.201.000 Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru.321.095.337 3.385.001 a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Guru Residuals Statistics a Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation N Predicted Value 77.21 122.54 98.20 9.689 64 Residual -16.637 20.544.000 8.425 64 Std. Predicted Value -2.167 2.512.000 1.000 64 Std. Residual -1.927 2.380.000.976 64 a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja Guru Charts

208