Divided Past To Integrated Future Developments in local public rail transport in Berlin

Similar documents
Regional Integration of Public Transit - From the Perspective of a Transit Company. April 2019 Thomas Werner MVG Munich

eature Easy-to-Access Rail JR East s Initiatives Yoshihiko Ito Railway Universal Designs and Architectural Features Introduction

Kreis Ostholstein, the Fehmarnbelt Committee, municipalities, tourist attractions and transport enterprises in the Fehmarnbelt Region

COSTS IN PREVENTION OF CRIME ON PUBLIC TRANSPORT

STUDY ON IMPLEMENTING THE EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

Green Line LRT: Beltline Segment Update April 19, 2017

Innovative Stations for an Innovative Transport System the Maglev Stations Munich Central Railway Station ( Hauptbahnhof ) Airport

Mobility in Germany Basis for Growth and Employment. Tel Aviv May 19,2014

Curbing emissions and energy consumption in the transport sector how can we deal with it in Warsaw 2012 Annual POLIS Conference

Innovative approaches to land use and urban development: creating livable communities

Innovative track systems for mainline and urban rail transportation

Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions

Investor Relations Release

PROMOTING THE UPTAKE OF ELECTRIC AND OTHER LOW EMISSION VEHICLES

Ex-Ante Evaluation (for Japanese ODA Loan)

Press Presse Press Presse

Driving comfort whoever wants to see it combined with economy cannot get past DIWA.5

BRT: NOT JUST LOW COST

Manufacturing operating and maintaining different rolling stock

Selection of Technologies to Integrate Urban and Suburban Public Rail Transport

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

BOStrab in Germany Regulation on the Construction and Operation of Urban Rail Systems

One City, One System: Integrating Public Urban Transportation in Coimbra

Welcome. Green Line in Your Community

SMART DIGITAL GRIDS: AT THE HEART OF THE ENERGY TRANSITION

Bus Rapid Transit. Briefing. Common to all BRT schemes is the aim to improve passengers experience and percep on of public transport

What We Heard Report - Metro Line NW LRT

Welcome to the world of electromobility!

La Jolla Community Parking Management Plan A PLAN TO ADDRESS PARKING ISSUES AND TO UNIFY OUR COMMUNITY March 1, 2008

Date of occurrence Location name Holland Park station Local time 18:35 Latitude 51:30:26 North

2014 VACO Achievement Award Program Nomination Summary York County, Virginia

Service and Operations Planning for Ottawa s New Light Rail Line Pat Scrimgeour

Berlin. Barrier-free 2018

Study on Economic Partnership Projects. in Developing Countries in FY2010. Study on the Kiev Metro Line 4 in Kiev City, Ukraine SUMMARY.

The ECORailS Guidelines in use Examples from the pilot application Berlin-Brandenburg Technology Innovation Agency Berlin (TSB)

Retrofitting unlocks potential

LRT Almaty, PPP. 23 January 2018, Brussels

Adelaide Metro priority seating and allocated space

INTRODUCTION. Ansaldo STS. Ansaldo STS is a leading technology company operating in railway and underground transportation.

D 5.2b Periodic Report

Berlin. Barrier-free 2019

Hamburg moving towards Electromobility. Dr. Sicco Rah Hanse-Office, Joint Representation of Hamburg and Schleswig-Holstein to the EU

Motorways and Tomorrow s Urban Mobility

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

The need for change of the transport mode in the great cities of Romania

Strategic Plan

Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0 Project Overview. Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0 Mobilitätsbeirat Hamburg 01. July 2015

Enhancement and Utilization of Multipurpose Integrated Highly-Advanced Railway Applications (MIHARA) Test Center

TRANSFORMING RAIL TRAVEL - TRANSFORMING RAIL TRAVEL - TRANSFORMING RAIL TRAVEL - TRANSFORMING

Mobility As A Service: Czech approach to MAAS

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Gateshead Care Call. Gateshead Council, Regent Street Gateshead NE8 1HH Tel: How are we doing? April March 2013

NATIONAL INNOVATION PROGRAMME HYDROGEN AND FUEL CELL TECHNOLOGY (NIP)

Transport systems integration into urban development planning processes

Proposed FY Capital Improvement Program (CIP) March 5, 2018 Capital Planning Committee 1

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Railyard Alternatives & I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study 1 RAILYARD ALTERNATIVES & I-280 BOULEVARD (RAB) FEASIBILITY STUDY

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

Fresno County. Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Public Workshop

Status of Plans March Presented by CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

Financing Public Transportation Operations

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Financing Public Transport Projects by EBRD

Toward the Realization of Sustainable Mobility

HOW TO DELIVER PUBLIC TRANSPORT ON REDUCED BUDGET

InnoTrans SEPTEMBER BERLIN

siemens.com/mobility Trainguard Full interoperability for rail traffic

Modernising the Great Western railway

A level-based approach to public transport network planning

2013/2014 Strategic Priorities Fund Application Overview

AND CHANGES IN URBAN MOBILITY PATTERNS

The 3 rd European Road Safety Action Programme

The integration of traction equipment into a vehicle computer network

Electricity Law (1984) (1984 People's Parliament (PyiThu Hluttaw) Act No. 7)

REHAU UNDERGROUND/SUBURBAN RAILWAY SYSTEMS. Selected references

Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal

New products, services and technologies at IT-TRANS 2018

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Japanese ODA Loan. Ex-ante Evaluation

Policy Coordination in Urban Transport Planning: Some Experience from Asia- Nepal and Japan

History of Subway in Kyoto

Electronic Protection Systems for Direct Current Railways. The Future for Railways Made in Germany

Third Rail Current Collectors TRANSIT APPLICATIONS STEMMANN-TECHNIK QUALITY MADE IN GERMANY

Deliverable T Study trip Report template

InnoTrans SEPTEMBER BERLIN

Onward travel. Insights from HS2 online panel

Sean P. McBride, Executive Director Kalamazoo Metro Transit. Presentation to Michigan Transportation Planning Association July 13, 2016

Scarborough Transit Planning

St. Catharines Transit Commission Accessibility Plan. St. Catharines Transit Commission Accessibility Plan

THE WAY TO HIGHLY AUTOMATED DRIVING.

Sofia Urban Transport challenges and strategies

Balancing the Transportation Needs of a Growing City

An Introduction to Automated Vehicles

Halifax Commuter Rail: A Fresh Concept

To Our Business Partners

Introduction of Electric Bus Technology in Egypt

Presentation of the Baltimore Metro System

Transcription:

Divided Past To Integrated Future Developments in local public rail transport in Berlin Konrad C. F. Lorenzen Developments of past 5 years The fall of the Berlin Wall 5 years ago, ushered in a new era in Berlin's local public transport. Two rail networks, which had been separated for 28 years, and which had developed in fundamentally different directions, had to be united again. This meant that in the eastern and western sectors of the city, plans, which had been in preparation for many years became waste paper from one day to the next. It was not simply a case of being able to reinstate the connections broken by the building of the Wall in 1961. During the 1950s, West Berlin had already decided to opt entirely for expansion of the underground which was to form the skeleton of local public transport with bus lines oriented towards finer distribution. Initially and for political reasons, the S-bahn system, which had been extended continually up until the beginning of WWII, hardly played any part in the official public transport planning of West Berlin. It was run by the Deutsche Reichsbahn, the German Democratic Republic's state railway, and was beyond the planning reach of the western sector. In addition, it was boycotted by the West Berliners after the building of the Wall. However, the S-bahn played an important role in East Berlin, complemented by the tram network which primarily connected the new suburbs with the inner city. Deutsche Bahn AG, as operator of the S-bahn. The underground and the S-bahn were to be designed as a single transport system, formed of two different components, despite different operation methods and different operators. This development had already been prepared for during the 1980s, because direct passenger connections to the underground, which were not previously available, were put in place during the reconstruction of the S- bahn. Logically, on the one hand, the network expansions, which took place at the beginning of the 1990s, could be seen as a mark of the reconstruction of the transport routes that had been abruptly torn apart in 1961. On the other hand, they could be seen as enabling the close interlinking of the two rail systems. Until 2000, this situation will change very little. Only then can planning considerations, which are connected with moving the German parliament and government to Berlin at the end of the 1990s, be implemented. Consequently, a new underground line is planned in the center of Berlin primarily to connect both the government quarter and the capital's new central main-line railway station, which is also at the planning stage, to the existing network. Also, the S-bahn ring is to be joined once more, and a regional rail network operating deep into the regions surrounding Berlin, will be opened. little interest to them. For this reason, for more than 5 years, the BVG has already set the course towards an integrated Berlin public transport system. This forward-looking decision bore fruit after the unexpected fall of the Wall. It gave the lead for the necessary standardisation during the turbulence following the first days of reunification. The pre-planning carried out by the BVG made quick integration of the public transport system in Berlin and its surrounding areas possible. This integration has made astonishingly rapid progress in the last 5 years. The principle, forming the basis of the BVG thinking on integrated design, is customer orientation. The passenger leading and information system was the main building block for starting development of the integrated design for the BVG public service company. In terms of this integrated design, a concept for the future Berlin underground was developed to unify all sectors of underground operations, the rolling stock, personnel deployment, operating procedures and passenger care and passenger information. Customer orientation as basis This design concept is made up of the following individual elements: After the Wall Following Berlin's reunification, the top priority was quickly defined -- development of a unified municipal rail network maintained by two parties: the city-owned Berlin Public Transport Services (BVG), as operator of the underground, and the En route to integrated design An integrated municipal railway network as the basis of the Berlin public transport system is an eyecatching advantage to passengers, but who runs the different companies operating the individual parts is of Latest U-bahn carriage (Author) 30 Japan Railway & Transport Review / March 1995

Berlin Subway Network (U-Bahn) before 1989 Brandenburg Gate and Berlin Wall in 1987 Victims of Wall (1987) Berlin Subway Network (U-Bahn) U-bahn train Japan Railway & Transport Review / March 1995 31

Berlin Rapid Transit Railway (S-Bahn) Network before 1989 Brandenburg Gate shortly after fall of Wall (1990) Peeping through Wall (1990) Berlin Rapid Transit Railway (S-Bahn) Network S-Bahn train 32 Japan Railway & Transport Review / March 1995

Berlin Tram Network 1989 Brandenburg Gate now Ruined Anhalter main line station Berlin Tram Network with Planned Line Extensions Tram in Eastern Berlin Japan Railway & Transport Review / March 1995 33

Rathaus Reinickendorf Underground Statio (Author) 1. The service concept (software All underground services will be designed with customer friendliness in mind. New customer care possibilities are being developed. Monotonous, stereotyped operational tasks within the service will, if possible, be carried out by computer. The human work-force is to be freed for service to the customer based on the motto "Customer service instead of operational service". Since transport is a service-oriented business, service design is of primary importance. Furthermore, the service concept utilises new passenger information and passenger leading systems to make trains, stations and other associated facilities such as equipment, ticket machines, emergency and aid facilities, easy to use. What we call a "uniform user interface" is achieved by this means. 2. The security concept (software Many older underground systems in big cities are perceived as dangerous places frequented by criminals, although in objective terms, they are not. Subjective and objective passenger security is the target of the integrated underground concept. The so-called subjective passenger security, or each passenger's perception of the security, is the crucial yardstick for acceptance and evaluation of the quality of the underground system. The starting point for a uniform security concept is analysis of all types of unease on the part of passengers. These range from objective situations of unease, such as isolation on empty platforms, to loss of orientation in the labyrinthine underground. The BVG's security concept therefore contains measures to increase objective security, as well as measures to lead to an increase in subjective security. 3. New computer-aided operational management concept (infrastructure To direct, control, monitor, and secure the safety of the underground system, the BVG has developed a broad new computer-aided operational management concept making operation more reliable, safer, faster and more rational. The new orientation away from company service and towards customer service necessitates different, computer-aided operations management. In this regard, linking various computer-aided systems means treading new paths in data acquisition, data preparation and data processing. Konrad C.F. Lorenzen 4. New train concept (hardware The central design target is the new Berlin underground train concept to be realised within a few weeks. Based on this new train concept, a number of other improvement concepts become possible. The new train concept has main design targets of better and multifunctional customer use, increased subjective and objective security and userfriendliness for the disabled, plus increased operational reliability, capacity and performance. The features of the new train concept are: Six-carriage, continuous trains with wide, open transitional sections from carriage-to-carriage Open and clear layout of interior architecture Removable driver's cabin for future driver-less operation Parallel seating for increased subjective security (no one is behind you) Multi-purpose areas for prams/ pushchairs, wheelchairs, bicycles Electronically-controlled level equalisers on platform edges Uniform operating 'interface' with all other BVG vehicles (trams and buses) (coordinated design for entire BVG vehicle family) 5. The station concept (hardware Underground stations are an important part of underground passengers 'user interface' and require particular attention by the designer. In the main, they are designed with two aspects in mind: a. Every underground station is to be regarded as unique. Its particular distinguishing features are determined by its location within the city center, its importance in terms of traffic and its individual architecture. b. Each underground station is a part of the total underground system and is therefore part of the public transport system. This must be clearly reflected in the station design. In this respect, the station is also a part of the corporate BVG design. As a result of this program, Berlin is changing from one of the world's oldest underground systems into one of the most modern and forward-looking systems. It is soon to become the most important artery in the throbbing Berlin metropolis. K. Lorenzen w as born in 1936. He studied economic sciences at the Free University of Berlin and the universities of Munich and Cologne. He began his professional life as a member of the planning staff of Hamburger Hochbahn Inc. In 1983. For more than 20 years he was general manager of MVG Markische Verkehrsbetriebe Ud., a regional bus and railway company. Since 1988 he has been a member of the board of the BVG in Berlin. He is a member of the Managing Committee and the Metro-Commission of UITP and a member of the presidential board of VDV Verband Deutscher Verkehrsunternehmen (Association of German Public Transport Systems. 34 Japan Railway & Transport Review / March 1995