Design and Integration of Suspension, Brake and Steering Systems for a Formula SAE Race Car

Similar documents
Simulating and Prototyping a Formula SAE Race Car Suspension System

Design and Analysis of suspension system components

SUMMARY OF STANDARD K&C TESTS AND REPORTED RESULTS

SPMM OUTLINE SPECIFICATION - SP20016 issue 2 WHAT IS THE SPMM 5000?

General Vehicle Information

SPMM OUTLINE SPECIFICATION - SP20016 issue 2 WHAT IS THE SPMM 5000?

White Paper: The Physics of Braking Systems

Optimization of vehicle handling performance by increasing the ARB effectiveness. Date :- 22 June 2010

DESIGN, ANALYSIS AND FABRICATION OF BRAKING SYSTEM WITH REAR INBOARD BRAKES IN BAJA ATV

TECHNICAL NOTE. NADS Vehicle Dynamics Typical Modeling Data. Document ID: N Author(s): Chris Schwarz Date: August 2006

Solar Car Suspension Design Considerations for achieving an efficient and stable vehicle

Designing and Hard Point Optimization of Suspension System of a Three-Wheel Hybrid Vehicle

Vehicle Load Transfer. Wm Harbin Technical Director BND TechSource

Tech Tip: Trackside Tire Data

KINEMATICS OF REAR SUSPENSION SYSTEM FOR A BAJA ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE.

4 Bar Linkage Calculator v3.0 Bump Travel 4.00 in Droop Travel in Static Geometry: Bump Geometry: Droop Geometry: Upper Links x y z Upper Links

Dynamic Analysis of Double Wishbone and Double Wishbone with S Link + Toe Link

BRAKE SYSTEM FUNDAMENTALS KARAN BHARDIYA ASSISTANT MANAGER -R&D ENDURANCE TECHNOLOGIES PVT.LTD. DISC BRAKES

Kinematic Analysis of Roll Motion for a Strut/SLA Suspension System Yung Chang Chen, Po Yi Tsai, I An Lai

Torque steer effects resulting from tyre aligning torque Effect of kinematics and elastokinematics

1 Summary PROPORTIONAL RESPONSE TECHNICAL SUMMARY. Contents

The High Performance, High Payload Driving School Car Based on a 1995 BMW 318is. Kevin Chow Bob Matarese Harris Yong

University of Wisconsin-Platteville Formula SAE Design Report

University of Alberta Design Report

ME 455 Lecture Ideas, Fall 2010

Chassis development at Porsche

2012 Dalhousie University Formula SAE Design Report

Assetto Corsa Car Modding Worksheet v0.16

Suspension systems and components

Steering and Suspension

A double-wishbone type suspension is used in the front. A multi-link type suspension is used in the rear. Tread* mm (in.) 1560 (61.

VEHICLE HANDLING BASICS

Real Square RSX User Instructions v. 10.2

along with standard XT2 Instruction Manual and also XT2 18 Supplementary Sheet.

Unit HV04K Knowledge of Heavy Vehicle Chassis Units and Components

Design Methodology of Steering System for All-Terrain Vehicles

Compelete analysis of chasis design of automobile vehicle using finite element method

STUDY OF ROLL CENTER SAURABH SINGH *, SAGAR SAHU ** ABSTRACT

3 Link Calculator v1.0 - Vector-Based with Graphical Worksheet Add-In Vehicle Specifications: Wheelbase in = Mess with these cells

CLICK for More Info Online

2008 LCF. Dimensions FORD LCF. Ford LCF. May 2007

2. MEASURE VEHICLE HEIGHT. (b) Measure the vehicle height. Measurement points: C: Ground clearance of front wheel center

Jaroslav Maly & team CAE departament. AV ENGINEERING, a.s.

II YEAR AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING AT AUTOMOTIVE CHASSIS QUESTION BANK UNIT I - LAYOUT, FRAME, FRONT AXLE AND STEERING SYSTEM

DOUBLE WISHBONE SUSPENSION SYSTEM

Design and optimization of Double wishbone suspension system for ATVs

Formula Student Car Suspension Design

1. SPECIFICATIONS 2. WHEEL ALIGNMENT Front Suspension. (gas type) Rear Suspension. (gas type)

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF PUSH ROD ROCKER ARM SUSPENSION USING MONO SPRING

Fundamentals of Steering Systems ME5670

WHY CHOOSE MOTOR TRIKE INDEPENDENT REAR SUSPENSION?

To Order Call (562)

Vehicle Dynamic Systems Final Portfolio

BRAKE SYSTEM DESIGN AND THEORY

ROLL CENTER You can adjust the front and rear roll centers of the XB8 by changing the mounting locations of various components.

Appendix X New Features in v2.4 B

SRI VIDYA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING. ME AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING Question Bank

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development. Design of Braking System of BAJA Vehicle

Design of Formula SAE Suspension

ASSEMBLY INSTRUCTIONS

Vehicle dynamics Suspension effects on cornering

The University of Akron 2015 SAE Zips Baja Off- Road Racing Team 2015 Suspension System Design

Technical Report Lotus Elan Rear Suspension The Effect of Halfshaft Rubber Couplings. T. L. Duell. Prepared for The Elan Factory.

2010 Sponsorship Information Package

Design, Modelling & Analysis of Double Wishbone Suspension System

Multilink IRS Setup & Assembly Manual

DESIGN, ANALYSIS AND FABRICATION OF RACING GO- KART

2008 F53 Motorhome Chassis

SAE Mini Baja. Final Presentation. Benjamin Bastidos, Jeramie Goodwin, Eric Lockwood Anthony McClinton, Caizhi Ming, Ruoheng Pan May 2, 2014

SAE Mini BAJA: Suspension and Steering

Vehicle Engineering MVE 420 (2015)

Real Square 2011 RS400PRO Quick Start User Instructions v. 10.1

A new approach to steady state state and quasi steady steady state vehicle handling analysis

iracing.com Williams-Toyota FW31 Quick Car Setup Guide

Identification of tyre lateral force characteristic from handling data and functional suspension model

A 1 SERVICE SPECIFICATIONS

Brake System Operation

DRIVE-CONTROL COMPONENTS

Section 15 Unit Selection Procedures

DYNATUNE END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

DESIGN METHODOLOGY FOR STEERING SYSTEM OF AN ATV

X4-X7 Hyper 600cc Chassis Setup Guide

Design Presentation ROADIES. Regd. ID : National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology, Ranchi L/O/G/O.

F53 Super Duty Motorhome Chassis

1. SPECIFICATIONS 2. WHEEL ALIGNMENT

F53 Super Duty Motorhome Chassis

SIX-BAR STEERING MECHANISM

Rear suspension improvement of a Lotus SEVEN Pag. 1

Chapter-3. Wheel Alignment Wheel Kinematics and Compliance Steering Performance Criteria for Handling

SUSPENSION OF A MOUNTAIN BIKE SVOČ FST Bc. Vít Prošek University of West Bohemia Univerzitni 8, Pilsen Czech Republic

2005 to 2008 #08 Metric Nova Chassis Set Up Sheet

MODELING SUSPENSION DAMPER MODULES USING LS-DYNA

MECA0063 : Braking systems

Part 1. The three levels to understanding how to achieve maximize traction.

IRS Racing Brake Kit (MMBAK-15, -16)

Parameters. Version 1.0 6/18/2008 1

Cornering & Traction Test Rig MTS Flat-Trac IV CT plus

CONTENTS. All texts and images contained within this set-up book are copyright by XRAY. All rights reserved. XRAY

INSTALLATION GUIDE Bolt-On Drag-Race Strut Clip Chevy II

NEW DESIGN AND DEVELELOPMENT OF ESKIG MOTORCYCLE

Transcription:

Design and Integration of Suspension, Brake and Steering Systems for a Formula SAE Race Car Mark Holveck 01, Rodolphe Poussot 00, Harris Yong 00 Final Report May 5, 2000 MAE 340/440 Advisor: Prof. S. Bogdonoff

Behind the Wheels

Vehicle Control Systems Suspension System Fall semester s focus Kinematics (motion of wheel) Dynamics (behavior of the wheel and car) Steering System Control, stability, consistency Brake System Control, efficiency, effectiveness Philosophies: Reliability, adjustability

Suspension Update Repositioned all shock absorber attachment points for reduced bending loads and optimized load paths Grounded rear track rod/toe link for strength Completed final parts for all corners of the car Rethought items for reliability and adjustability

Front Axle

Hub

Front Brakes Wilwood 1.75 single piston floating calipers 7.5 diameter vented, cross-drilled, slotted, cast-iron rotors

Brake Considerations Deceleration (1.2G design) dependent on fluid pressure, relative piston sizes, tire traction... Brake bias (60/40 design) balance brake torque between front and rear tires adjustable balance bar Cooling 45 kj of energy from 50 mph to 10 mph about 20ºC rise in rotor temperature per stop

Steering System Stiletto steering rack Alpha steering wheel (quick release) Various mounting components

Steering Considerations Ratio 3.6:1 to 3.3:1, less than 1 turn lock to lock Ackermann geometry difference in steering angle between inside and outside tires inside tire turns more (smaller radius) Bump and compliance steer wheels don t change direction over bumps or under load determined by relative locations of suspension and steering points

Steering Outer Track Rod Attachment Modular attachment allows changes in steering geometry (Ackermann, bump steer, ratio) without refabricating the entire upright reduces material usage

Reynard Kinematics Used to determine suspension and steering locations in pitch and roll

Rear Axle

Rear Shock Extension Replaces lower spring perch and spherical bearing to gain adjustable length and flexibility

Rear Shock Mounting Points Adjustable mounting points to balance car through corners Rear ride rate: 45 lb/in to 115 lb/in Use of locked spool axle requires different characteristics

Rear Axle Mount Single inboard brake system Adjacent to drive chain and sprocket Adjustable position for chain tensioning

Suspension Track: 1200mm / 1130mm Tire size: 18x7.5x10 Camber: -1º / -1.5º Caster: 8.1º Scrub radius: 51.5 mm Motion ratios: 1.75 / adjustable Roll gradient: 1.6º per G nominal Ride frequencies: 2.2 Hz / 2.8 Hz nominal Anti-dive/squat: 12% B C F G H I J K L M N 1 2 3 Basic Vehicle Lengths and CG Vertical Location 4 CG height White cells in 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 5 wheelbase are for data mm 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 6 wheelbase entry. in 68.90 68.90 68.90 68.90 68.90 68.90 68.90 68.90 68.90 7 track mm 1200 1200 1200 1130 1200 1130 1200 1130 1200 Gray cells are 8 track in 47.24 47.24 47.24 44.49 47.24 44.49 47.24 44.49 47.24 calculated or 9 average track in 47.24 47.24 45.87 45.87 45.87 45.87 45.87 45.87 45.87 dervied values. 10 average track mm 1200 1200 1165 1165 1165 1165 1165 1165 1165 11 12 Spring and Damper Mounting Orientation 19 motion ratio (according to Reynard Kinematics) - 2.04 2.61 1.75 1.43 1.75 1.43 1.75 1.43 1.75 20 21 Vehicle Weights and Weight Distribution 22 1 axle sprung weight lb 225 275 225 275 225 275 225 275 247.5 23 2 axle sprung weight lb 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 550 24 1 axle unsprung weight lb 45 45 80 70 80 70 80 70 80 25 2 axle sprung weight lb 90 90 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 26 1 axle total weight lb 270 320 305 345 305 345 305 345 327.5 27 2 axle total weight lb 590 590 650 650 650 650 650 650 700 28 sprung mass CG in 12.5 12.5 12.9 12.9 12.9 12.9 12.9 12.9 12.8 29 sprung mass distribution % 45 55 45 55 45.0 55.0 45.0 55.0 45.0 30 overall mass distribution % 46 54 47 53 46.9 53.1 46.9 53.1 46.8 31 32 Derived Rates 33 ride frequency Hz 2.0 2.2 2.8 2.5 2.8 2.5 2.4 2.2 34 ride frequency cpm 120 132 169 152 169 152 143 129 35 ride frequency ratio - 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 36 ride rate lb/in 46 68 91 90 91 90 66 65 91 37 tire rate lb/in 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 38 tire static loaded radius in 9.13 9.13 9.13 9.13 9.13 9.13 9.13 9.13 9.13 39 wheel center rate lb/in 48 72 98 97 98 97 69 69 48 40 spring rate lb/in 200 491 300 200 300 200 41 42 Roll Geometry and Rates 43 roll center height mm 24 53 24 53-165.0-23.0 24 53 24 44 roll center height in 0.96 2.08 0.96 2.08-6.496-0.906 0.961 2.083 0.961 45 rolling moment lever arm in 10.94 10.94 11.28 11.28 16.284 16.284 11.285 11.285 11.206 46 rolling moment per g lateral acceleration lb-ft/g 456 456 470 470 678 678 470 470 514 47 1 axle spring roll rate lb-ft/deg 75 110 147 129 147 129 106 94 148 48 2 axle spring roll rate lb-ft/deg 185 185 277 277 277 277 200 200 277 49 roll gradient with springs alone deg/g 2.5 2.5 1.7 1.7 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 1.9 50 51 Anti-Roll Bar Geometry 52 ARB shear modulus ARB dimensions are psi 1.00E+07 1.00E+07 1.00E+07 1.00E+07 1.00E+07 1.00E+07 1.00E+07 1.00E+07 1.00E+07 53 ARB inner radius on approximate and in 0.100 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 54 ARB outer radius are used only to in 0.140 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 55 ARB area moment of inertia generate additional in^4 4.464E-04 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 56 ARB lever arm length roll stiffness values in 4.00 6.00 4.00 6.00 4.000 6.000 4.000 6.000 4.000 57 chassis to ARB attachment point for balancing load mm 350 300 350 300 350.0 300.0 350.0 300.0 350.0 58 ARB linkage ratio distribution. - 2.27 2.27 2.27 2.27 2.273 2.273 2.273 2.273 2.273 59 ARB length mm 700.0 600.0 700.0 600.0 700.0 600.0 700.0 600.0 700.0 60 61 Anti-Roll Bar Contribution 62 ARB twist rate lb-ft/deg 2.36E-01 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 64 ARB roll rate lb-ft/deg 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 2 axle ARB roll rate lb-ft/deg 42 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 67 Net Roll Characteristics 68 axle roll rate lb-ft/deg 117 110 147 129 147 129 106 94 148 69 2 axle roll rate lb-ft/deg 227 227 277 277 277 277 200 200 277 70 roll gradient deg/g 2.0 2.0 1.7 1.7 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 1.9 71 roll at 1.5G lateral acceleration deg 3.0 3.0 2.5 2.5 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.5 2.8 72 73 Lateral Load Transfer and Lateral Load Transfer Distribution Description Units January's Design Intent (FR) January's Design Intent (RR) May's Implemented System (FR) May's Implemented System (RR) With Worst Case RC (FR) With Worst Case RC (RR) ride frequency (FR) With 15% lower With 15% lower ride frequency (RR) With 10% Gre Sprung

Steering Steering System Ratio: 3.6:1 to 3.3:1 Caster: 8.1º Scrub radius: 51.5 mm Steering wheel diameter: 250 mm Perfect Ackermann until 26º of inside wheel steering

Brake Design deceleration: 1.2G Design pedal force: 120 lb. Swept area: 350 sq. in. / ton Rotor diameter: 7.5 in. / 8.0 in. Design parameters Braking from 50 mph Temperature rise (C) 19 o To 10 mph Swept Area per ton 351 sq ins Design deceleration 1.2 G Front line pressure 741 psi Pedal force 120 lbs Rear line pressure 473 psi Front rotor diameter 7.5 in Actual braking effort 59.9 %F Front rotor mass 4.3 lbs 40.1 %R Brake data Front pad height 1.5 in 57.9 %F Required balance at design g Rear rotor diameter 8 in 42.1 %R Rear rotor mass 4.3 lbs Max braking torque - Front 356 lb-ft Rear pad height 1.7 in Max braking torque - Rear 239 lb-ft Number of rear rotors 1 Max braking G available at pedal force 1.205 G Front caliper - number of pistons 1 Pedal travel for 0.05 in piston travel 2.78 in Piston diameter 1.75 ins Rear caliper - number of pistons 2 One side area of solid front rotor 44.2 sq in Piston diameter 1.75 ins One side unswept area of front rotor 28.3 sq in Front master cylinder diameter 0.750 in Front rotor 1 side swept area 15.9 sq in Rear master cylinder diameter 0.875 in Front rotors total sw ept area 63.6 sq in Piston travel under full brake application 0.050 in One side area of solid rear rotor 50.3 sq in Pedal to pivot 5.1 in Rear rotor 1 side swept area 31.2 sq in Pedal data Pushrod to pivot 1 in Rear ro tor 1 side swept area 19.1 sq in Rear master cylinder 1.15 in Rear rotors total swept area 38.2 sq in to balance bar center Front master cylinder to balance bar center 1 in Total front piston area 4.81 sq in Vehicle data Wheelbase 66.9 in Total rear piston area 4.81 sq in Vehicle weight 650 lbs Front master cylinder area 0.44 sq in static load 225 lbs Rear master cylinder area 0.60 sq in Front tyre diameter 18 in Pedal leverage ratio 5.10 static load 275 lbs Balance bar proportion F 0.47 Rear tyre diameter 18.3 in Balance bar proportion R 0.53 CG to ground 13.0 in Force on balance bar 612.0 lbs Coefficient of friction of tyres 1.5 Front master cylinder force 327.3 lbs Coefficient of friction of brakes 0.40 Rear master cylinder force 284.7 lbs Front brake fluid line pressure 741 psi Rear brake fluid line pressure 473 psi Front rotors clamping force 3564 lbs Rear rotors clamping force 2277 lbs Kinetic energy to absorb/dissipate 34783 lb-ft Kinetic energy to absorb/dissipate 47159 J Total rotor weight 13 lbs Temperature rise 35 F Max force at front tire contact patches 469 lbs Max force at rear tire contact patches 314 lbs Max force at all contact patches 783 lbs Deceleration 1.20 G Front hydraulic advantage 11 Rear hydrualic advntage 8 Front rod movement 0.54444 Pedal movement 2.777 load at design deceleration 376.6 lbs load at design deceleration 273.4 lbs Hydraulic advantage: 11:1 / 8:1 Mechanical advantage: 5.1:1 Fluid line pressure: 750 psi / 500 psi Brake bias: 40 / 60 nominal

Future Work Successfully implemented suspension, steering, brake systems Short term work: brake hydraulics rear axle items Long term work: testing reliability vs. weight assessment re-evaluate many technical details to optimize the car

Recommendations Full car model to resolve clearance details Larger wheel diameter

Acknowledgments The entire MAE department too many people to list Other Formula SAE teams

Questions