AEP Ohio Distribution Reliability and Technology Programs

Similar documents
Ohio Energy. Workshop CC. Wednesday, February 22, :15 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.

PLANNING TO START OR EXPAND A BUSINESS?

Voice of the Customer Mike Lowe, SRP Executive (retired) Landis+Gyr January 29, 2019 Capital Markets Day 1

Summer Reliability Assessment Report Electric Distribution Companies Perspective

INTRODUCTION TO SMART GRID

Electric Vehicle Charge Ready Program

Manager of Market Strategy and Planning September 22, 2008

Galapagos San Cristobal Wind Project. VOLT/VAR Optimization Report. Prepared by the General Secretariat

Electric Vehicle Basics for Your Business

Smart Grid Progress and Plans

Andrew Tang Smart Energy Web Pacific Gas and Electric Company September 18, 2009

2017 Colorado Phase 2 Regulatory Rate Review Frequently asked questions

July 28, 2009 Presentation to the Illinois Statewide Smart Grid Collaborative

Evolving our Customer Relationship: Edison SmartConnect Programs & Services Mark Podorsky, Sr. Manager Business Design

RI Power Sector Transformation Con Edison Experiences. May 31 st, 2017

Smart Grid Implementation at the Sacramento Municipal Utility District

Smarting From Resistance to Smart Grids

Carnegie Mellon University Smart Infrastructure Development

California Energy Commission. December 7, 2015

Building a 21 st Century Electric Grid. February 23, 2018

Pepco Holdings, Inc. Blueprint for the Future and the Mid-Atlantic Regulatory. Steve Sunderhauf PHI Regulatory Group June 11, 2009

Contents. Solar Select TM Frequently Asked Questions

Electric Vehicles and the Power Grid. October 29, 2010 Biloxi, MS

Creating a Smarter Energy Grid for Our Customers

Smart Grid 2.0: Moving Beyond Smart Meters

Smart Grids from the perspective of consumers IEA DSM Workshop

Tomorrow s Energy Grid

PUBLIC Law, Chapter 539 LD 1535, item 1, 124th Maine State Legislature An Act To Create a Smart Grid Policy in the State

To: Honorable Public Utilities Board Submitted by: /s/ Rebecca Irwin AGM-Customer Resources. From: Kelly Birdwell Brezovec Approved by: /s/

KANSAS CITY POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY P.S.C. MO. No. 7 Fourth Revised Sheet No. 39 Canceling P.S.C. MO. No. 7 Third Revised Sheet No.

Powering the most advanced energy storage systems

2015 Grid of the Future Symposium

workplace charging an employer s guide

Building a Stronger and Smarter Electrical Energy Infrastructure. Smart Grid. A Necessary Component in the Remaking of America

Smart Grid and Demand Response

BGE Smart Energy Pricing: Customers are making it work

Electric Vehicle Strategy MPSC Technical Conference February 20, 2018

The Capital Grid Project:

IBM Global Energy and Utility Industry. IBM Investments

Transportation Electrification Public Input Workshop. August 3, 2016

1065 Woodman Drive Twelfth Revised Sheet No. T8 Dayton, Ohio Page 1 of 5

Transport An affordable transition to sustainable and secure energy for light vehicles in the UK

Electrical District No. 3 SOLAR Q & A

Investing in our Energy Future. Secretary Steven Chu U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C. September 21, 2009

NAVIGANT RESEARCH INTRODUCTION

Electric Vehicle Cost-Benefit Analyses

Borrego Springs Microgrid Demonstration Overview

Grid Services From Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles: A Key To Economic Viability?

Smart Grids and Mobility

Smart Grid 2.0 Beyond Meters and onto Intelligent Energy Management. Robert Dolin, VP & CTO Session 101 Operations May 11, 2010

Smart Grid Update Supplier Conference. Kevin Dasso Senior Director Technology & Information Strategy. October 27, 2011

Preparing for Electric Vehicles: The Distribution System Perspective ON IT

California Low Emission Truck Policies and Plans

Agenda. Industry Rate Trends Summary of Financial Targets Cost of Service Information. Valuation of Solar

Executive Summary. DC Fast Charging. Opportunities for Vehicle Electrification in the Denver Metro area and Across Colorado

Smart Cities Industry, Technology and Citizens. December 2017 Dr. Fritz Rettberg

Net Metering in Missouri

Electric Vehicles and State Funds

Integrating DER. Thomas Bialek, PhD PE Chief Engineer. Smart Grid & Climate Change Summit October 13, 2015

EV - Smart Grid Integration. March 14, 2012

Monthly promotions. October 2018 Puget Sound Energy bill inserts and information. Download inserts

CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS GREEN FLEET POLICY

Energy Management Through Peak Shaving and Demand Response: New Opportunities for Energy Savings at Manufacturing and Distribution Facilities

Compressed Natural Gas Vehicles: The Road to a Cleaner Future

Low Carbon Green Growth Roadmap for Asia and the Pacific FACT SHEET

Electric Power Industry Vision

The retail price a household pays for the last unit of grid-supplied electricity consumed is an

Microgrid solutions Delivering resilient power anywhere at any time

IEEE-PES Chicago Chapter Presentation November 11, Smart Grid. Mike Born. Principal Engineer, Capacity Planning

Towards a Proposal for A Carbon Offset Fee for Cornell Business Travel. Bob Howarth The David R. Atkinson Professor of Ecology & Environmental Biology

Enabling Smart grids for the future Frits Bruggink Senior Vice President and General Manager Echelon Corporation USA

Traffic Signals and Streetlights

TRANSIT DRIVES PENNSYLVANIA MOBILITY FACT SHEET

Planning for Sustainability: Electric Vehicles

Incentives for Green Fleets

Overview of Plug-In Electric Vehicle Readiness. Coachella Valley Association of Governments

Information Packet Kissimmee Utility Authority Customer-Owned Renewable Generation Interconnection And Net Metering Program

northeast group, llc South America Smart Grid: Market Forecast ( ) Volume IV February 2018

SGCC PEER CONNECT WEBINAR: BENEFITS ANALYSIS. June 5, 2013

Off-Grid Renewable Energy Program in Myanmar. Pradeep Tharakan, PhD Senior Energy Specialist (Climate Change) Asian Development Bank

Smart Meter Cost Recovery

Fleet Options. Information and Comparison

Please visit the stations to provide your input: EV Charging Location Map EV Adoption ZEV Drivers Other Ideas

Better Place. Accelerating the transition to EVs!

SCE Smart Grid. Creating a Cleaner, Smarter Energy Future. Metering, Billing / MDM America Conference. San Diego. March 9, 2010

Electric Vehicles and EV Infrastructure Municipal Electric Power Association

Achievements and Perspectives of smart grids projects and deployments. M. de Nigris

Smart grid. Social risks, benefits, opportunities. Pankaj Batra Member (Planning), Central Electricity Authority

Electric Vehicle Cost-Benefit Analyses

Net Meter and Production Meter installed by Xcel Energy

Docket 50-ER-108 Algoma Utilities. Final Form Rate and Rule Tariff Sheets Amendment 78. Filed By: Public Service Commission of Wisconsin

The Near Future of Electric Transportation. Mark Duvall Director, Electric Transportation Global Climate Change Research Seminar May 25 th, 2011

Montgomery Township Community Energy Aggregation

Market Drivers for Battery Storage

S T A F F R E P O R T

2016 Corporate Responsibility Highlights ALWAYS DELIVERING.

Grid Operations and the Increasing Challenges of Balancing Renewable Energy ALBUQUERQUE QUALITY NETWORK

Metro-North Report on Metrics and Fare Evasion

THE alarming rate, at which global energy reserves are

Zero Emissions Airport Vehicle and Infrastructure Pilot Program Webinar

Transcription:

AEP Ohio Distribution Reliability and Technology Programs

Overview of Technologies and Reliability Plans gridsmart Phase II Case No. 13-1939-EL-RDR Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Distribution Automation Circuit Reconfiguration (DACR) Volt Var Optimization (VVO) Electric Security Plan III (ESP III) Extension Case No. 16-1852-EL-SSO Distribution Investment Rider (DIR) Vegetation Management Distribution Technology Plan Plug In Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Microgrids Smart Street Lighting LED Street Lights Next Generation Utility Communication System Substation Security

gridsmart Phase II Technologies

Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) AMI Meters 894,000 meters to be installed in over 30 communities Rollout period of 4 years Customer Option to Opt Out Opt out requires monthly manual meter reading fee of $24. AMI Benefits Online availability of usage data Allow customers to better understand the quantity of usage as well as time of usage to better understand and reduce their usage, saving money Meters read Remotely and Securely Remote meter reads means increased reliability through fewer bill estimates and operational savings that will be returned to customers More robust pricing options Customers will be able to participate in time-of-used programs Power outage detection Smart meters can allow the Company to detect if a power outage is effecting one customer or the community. This will allow for quicker detection so service can be restored faster

DACR Distribution Automation Circuit Reconfiguration (DACR) DACR will be placed on approximately 250 distribution circuits serving more than 330,000 customers Circuits selected will provide the greatest efficiency in reducing customer minutes of interruption DACR Benefits DACR for Phase II will provide up to 30 percent reduction in customer minutes of interruption Provides power outage data in real time allowing crews and dispatchers to restore power more quickly

Volt Var Optimization VVO Install Volt Var on over 160 circuits serving approximately 230,000 customers VVO allows the system to automatically receive voltage levels on circuits and operate regulating devices which lowers energy VVO Benefits Previous installation of VVO has shown a 2 to 3 percent reduction in energy and demand, lowering the end user consumption with nothing required by the customer, leading to bill savings

Phase II Investment & Rate Impacts AEP Ohio will invest approximately $516 million to deploy Phase II technologies over 7 years The typical bills shown are for each year. Years 4-7 do not include the reduction in the project costs that will occur due to operational savings. These savings will be determined through an audit process and will reduce the total project cost once approved.

ESP III Extension Technologies and Plans

Distribution Investment Plan Continues the Company s Comprehensive Reliability plan to continue to replace aging infrastructure (DIR) in order to improve or maintain the reliability of our service to our customers. Distribution Investment Rider the continuation of the DIR Plan will allow the Company to be proactive in asset replacement, avoiding outages by addressing aging infrastructure prior to power outages that impact reliability. Under the 2013 DIR work plan, Avoided approximately 306 outages Had the potential to avoid almost 30,983 outages, Completed work on circuits that would potentially reduce total customer outage minutes by 20,400. Under the 2014 DIR work plan, Avoided approximately 816 outages Had the potential to avoid almost 41,888 outages, Completed work on circuits that would potentially reduce total customer outage minutes by 31,200.

Vegetation Management Successes Since Inception Invested more than $450 million to keep trees away from our 31,000 miles of overhead lines; Implemented a four-year trim cycle of our lines; Completed the first full trim cycle of all 31,000 miles in 2014 while simultaneously trimming 6,817 miles into our second cycle; Cleared nearly half our total line miles for the second time during 2014 and 2015; Reduced outages caused by trees by 80 percent, thereby improving customers service: During 2010-2,700 outages caused by trees inside our Rights-of- Way( ROW ) versus during 2015-531 outages caused by trees inside our ROW.

Proposed DIR and Vegetation Management Spend DIR - $225M Each year 2018 through 2024 (Capital Spend) Incremental Vegetation Spend 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 O&M $26.5M $27.6M $28.8M $30.1M $31.4M $32.6M $34.0M Capital $1.2M $1.3M $1.4M $1.5M $1.7M $1.8M $1.9M

Proposed Distribution Technology Plan Technology Deployment Timeline Capital O&M Electric Vehicle Chargers 250 Level 2 Public Smart Chargers, 25 DC Fast Chargers 1,000 Residential Chargers 4 years for Phase 1 $6.4M $775,000 per year ongoing O&M Microgrids Smart Lighting Next Generation Utility Communication System Distribution Substation Security Technology 10 Microgrids 202,000 smart lighting controls 1,000 LED replacements 4 years for Phase 1 $52M 4 Years for Phase 1 $30M Replacement of existing system 4 Years $69M Technology deployed in up to 100 critical substations 4 years for Phase 1 $30M $1.5 million per year ongoing O&M $2.1 million per year ongoing O&M No incremental increase in ongoing O&M $1million $400,000 per year ongoing O&M

AEP Ohio s Commitment to Technology AEP Ohio is committed to using advanced technology to expand the services it provides its customers and to enhance its customers experience In addition, AEP Ohio is committed to support the success of the Smart Columbus challenge In December 2015, the United States Department of Transportation ( DOT ) announced a federal grant, the Smart City Challenge, to award $40 million to a single U.S. city to implement new technologies and innovative techniques to improve its transportation system. The DOT received seventy-eight applications from cities wishing to participate in the Smart City Challenge, and after narrowing the applications to seven finalists, the DOT selected Columbus, Ohio and the surrounding area as the winner on June 23, 2016.

Smart Columbus As explained by the Department of Transportation (DOT), the goals of Columbus s winning Smart City proposal are to demonstrate how advanced data and intelligent transportation systems (ITS) technologies and applications can be used to reduce congestion, keep travelers safe, use energy more efficiently, respond to climate change, both connect and create opportunities for underserved communities, and support economic vitality. The Smart Columbus program is also intended to provide safety improvements, enhance mobility, increase ladders of opportunity by incentivizing reinvestment in underserved communities, reduce energy usage, and address climate change. Detailed information about the Smart City Challenge can be found on the U.S. Department of Transportation s website: https://www.transportation.gov/smartcity.

Plug-In Electric Vehicle Charging Stations A key factor to promote PEV adoption is increased investment in charging station infrastructure PEVs are estimated to emit approximately 60 percent of the CO2 emissions of internal combustion vehicles 1 PEVs can be expected to cost approximately $1.00 per gasoline-gallon equivalent in electricity costs, providing a significant boost in average incomes and a reduction in petroleum imports 2 AEP Ohio estimates that, at the conclusion of deployment, avoided greenhouse gases for the electric vehicle charging station component of the Plan will be approximately 10,283 Tons per year. There would also be avoided carbon monoxide, particulate matter, and other emissions, which have not been estimated at this time. 1 U.S. Department of Energy, Alternative Fuels Data Center, Emissions from Hybrid and Plug-in Electric Vehicles (June 2016), available at http://www.afdc.energy.gov/vehicles/electric_emissions.php. 2 This assumes 290 watt-hours per mile, conventional vehicle mileage of 29 miles per gallon, and 12 cents per kilowatt-hour electricity cost. See Electric Power Research Institute, Total Cost of Ownership for Current Plug-in Electric Vehicles (2014), available at http://www.epri.com/abstracts/pages/productabstract.aspx?productid=000000003002004054.

Microgrids Microgrid implementation for critical community facilities Police and Fire Grocery and Gas Social Service Agencies Sewer and Water facilities Microgrid benefits Improved resiliency and reliability for critical infrastructure Reduced system peak demands Integration of intermittent renewable generation Clean energy generation and reduced emissions AEP Ohio estimates that, at the conclusion of deployment, avoided greenhouse gases for the microgrid component of the Plan will be approximately 3,176 Tons per year. There will also be some avoided sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, and other emissions, which have not been estimated at this time.

Smart Street Lighting Benefits of Smart Lighting Rapid Light Repair Controls let Company know power is out sooner Energy Saving through faster detection of day burners Increased customer satisfaction and operational savings through few call center requests Increased efficiency on detecting reason for outage Potential future use for dimming lights when not needed (the Company will not utilize this immediately) Faster response to lighting restoration AEP Ohio estimates that, at the conclusion of deployment, avoided greenhouse gases for the smart street lighting component of the Plan will be approximately 133 Tons per year. There will also be some avoided sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, and other emissions, which have not been estimated at this time.

Next Generation Utility Communication System Provide reliable voice communications in order to ensure the safe and efficient operation of the distribution grid by Company employees and contractors Field crews and personnel have the ability to initiate an emergency call for help NextGen UCS will provide coverage for more than 90% of AEP Ohio s service territory.

Security for Distribution Substations AEP Ohio proposes to install modern intrusion deterrence and detection technology to protect critical distribution substations from theft and vandalism AEP Ohio has experienced more than 250 incidents over the last eight years of individuals scaling or cutting substation fences to steal copper wiring AEP Ohio has also experienced more than 50 additional acts of vandalism and other theft at its substations Over the last ten years,17 AEP Ohio customers have experienced nearly 17 million customer minutes of interruption (CMI) associated with vandalism and theft at distribution substations

Proposed ESP III Ext. Bill Impact Year 1 Columbus Southern Power Rate Zone SSO Monthly Bills Household Current Proposed Change Tariff 1,000 kwh usage $134 $135 1.2% R-R Bill 2,000 kwh usage $254 $250-1.8% R-R Bill 4,000 kwh usage $495 $478-3.5% R-R Bill Small Business 1,000 kw demand and 100,000 kwh usage $15,349 $15,353 0.0% GS-2 Primary 1,000 kw demand and 350,000 kwh usage $33,108 $32,674-1.3% GS-3 Primary Industrial Business 20,000 kw demand and 8 million kwh usage $552,042 $528,806-4.2% GS-4 20,000 kw demand and 12 million kwh usage $791,094 $756,216-4.4% GS-4 Ohio Power Rate Zone SSO Monthly Bills Household Current Proposed Change Tariff 1,000 kwh usage $142 $143 1.1% RS Bill 2,000 kwh usage $271 $266-1.7% RS Bill 4,000 kwh usage $527 $510-3.2% RS Bill Small Business 1,000 kw demand and 100,000 kwh usage $16,933 $16,963 0.2% GS-2 Primary 1,000 kw demand and 300,000 kwh usage $32,692 $32,370-1.0% GS-2 Primary Industrial Business 20,000 kw demand and 8 million kwh usage $608,677 $585,416-3.8% GS-4 Transmission 20,000 kw demand and 12 million kwh usage $876,246 $841,343-4.0% GS-4 Transmission

This presentation is based on AEP Ohio s understanding of the issues and rulings of current and prior cases before the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, some of which may be subject to change or clarification. Further, the presentation is not attempting to address legal issues or impose any obligations on the Company that do not otherwise exist.