The Green Dividend. Cities facilitate less driving, saving money and stimulating the local economy. Joseph Cortright, Impresa September 2007

Similar documents
PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

Changing Behavior and Achieving Mode Shi2 Goals

GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT. Residents enjoying the newly opened Brickell City Centre on Nov. 3, 2016.

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

Measuring Accessibility. Andrew Owen Director, Accessibility Observatory May 17, 2017

The USDOT Congestion Pricing Program: A New Era for Congestion Management

2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

Transit and Job Growth: Lessons for SB 375. Jed Kolko Public Policy Institute of California

TRANSIT DEMAND IN RURAL DOUGLAS COUNTY: PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND DATA

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

BLACK KNIGHT HPI REPORT

NRG evgo. Arun Banskota President NRG evgo

APTA 2CA0le1 nd 7 Ar

car2go Toronto Proposal for on-street parking pilot project

TOD and Global Warming Weirding

The hidden prices of parking David King Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation Columbia University

State Safety Oversight Program

Parking Management Element

MAGAZINE S. The U.S. and. Canada s. Top 50. Passenger Rail Projects for 2003

6/11/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Urban Transportation in the United States: A Time for Leadership

APPLICATION OF A PARCEL-BASED SUSTAINABILITY TOOL TO ANALYZE GHG EMISSIONS

Los Angeles and California: Leading in Clean Technology

Emerging international best practices to promote electric vehicles

Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary

Overview of Regional Commuter Rail Webinar: Phoenix, Arizona December 18, 2013

Vehicle Miles Traveled in Massachusetts: Who is driving and where are they going?

Before the OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION Washington, D.C

Office of Transportation Bureau of Traffic Management Downtown Parking Meter District Rate Report

Sponsored by. The U.S. and Canada s

DAILY TRAVEL AND CO 2 EMISSIONS FROM PASSENGER TRANSPORT: A COMPARISON OF GERMANY AND THE UNITED STATES

CONNECTING CALIFORNIA

Top50. Passenger Rail Projects for 2007 THE U.S. AND CANADA S JUNE 2007 METRO MAGAZINE 21

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Figure 1 Unleaded Gasoline Prices

Transportation 2040: Plan Performance. Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017

Summit County Greenhouse Gas Emissions Summary, 2017

Emerging Technologies & Autonomous Vehicle Readiness Planning. Georgia Planning Association Conference Jekyll Island, GA September 5, 2018

Brake Manufacturers Council

CHART BOOK ON WAGES, OPERATING COSTS, AND COST OF LIVING

Urban transit is important for those who lack access to automobiles. But the

2018 Automotive Fuel Economy Survey Report

Transitioning to Integrated Sustainable Multi-mobility. A Model Climate Action Strategy

Off-Road Vehicle Recreation Report

September 21, Introduction. Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ), National Highway Traffic Safety

Performance Measure Summary - Portland OR-WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Clearing the Air in West Oakland: Port Impacts, Freight Transport & Environmental Justice

Corridor Management Committee. March 7, 2012

CONTRIBUTION OF THE BIODIESEL INDUSTRY TO THE ECONOMY OF THE UNITED STATES

Whither the Dashing Commuter?

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

The Escalation Roller Coaster and What You Can Do About It

Figure 1 Unleaded Gasoline Prices

Performance Measure Summary - New Orleans LA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Clean Cities Program Overview

Performance Measure Summary - Austin TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Why Light Rail Was Selected for the Durham- Orange Corridor. Orange County Board of County Commissioners February 16, 2017

OLYMPIC GATEWAY PLAZA

Needs and Community Characteristics

The Community of Yesteryear

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Performance Measure Summary - Washington DC-VA-MD. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

This letter provides SPUR s comments on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/ Subsequent Environmental Impact Report.

Successful Passenger Rail in the State of California

Transportation Demand Management Element

STATE ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY

Automotive Repair Technician

Equitable transit-oriented development: Tools + Tactics

State Policy Trends in Biomass

Transportation and Energy

Frequent Service Network Proposal

Clean Transportation Program. 1. Why EVs

Planning of the HSR Network

Transaction Trend. United States. Report Q LE s Real Estate Intelligence is Your Strategic Advantage

TRIMET S PARK & RIDE PROGRAM

DON T TRIP OVER PARKING. Karen Hancock, City of Aurora Moderator Reid Ewing University of Utah Anthony Avery, City of Aurora

Jeff s House. Downtown Charlottesville. PEC Office

Board of Directors authorization is required for all goods and services contracts obligating TriMet to pay in excess of $500,000.

What is Project Connect?

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

The RoadMAP to ELectric Vehicle Adoption. Model policies and programs to accelerate EV adoption at the state and local level.

Transit and Economic Growth: How Transit Supports the Development of Economically Competitive Communities

Tony Roma s (Closed) Fully Equipped Restaurant Building

Performance Measure Summary - Buffalo NY. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

The Denver Model. Miller Hudson

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

201 SOUTH MARY STREET Sunnyvale, CA

Performance Measure Summary - Spokane WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Breakout Session. The Mobility Challenges of Our Growing & Sprawling Upstate

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

Building Equitable Sustainable Transit OPEN HOUSE

Greening our Fleet Waste Management s Natural Gas Fleet Evolution

Taxi Certificate Update. April 19, 2016

Performance Measure Summary - Fresno CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Green Line Long-Term Investments

VISION AND ROADMAP for a Low-Carbon Pacific Coast Transportation System

Transcription:

The Green Dividend Cities facilitate less driving, saving money and stimulating the local economy Joseph Cortright, Impresa September 2007

Does being green pay? Is conservation just noble self-sacrifice; well-intentioned but un-economic? Or does it make a difference to the local economy?

Portland

Green Portland One of the nation s greenest cities City policy to limit greenhouse gases Land use and transportation policies Higher density Transportation alternatives Housing choices

Key Measure: Vehicle Miles Traveled Metropolitan VMT Per Capita, Per Day Median Portland 0 10 20 30 40 50 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation

Monetary Savings Annual savings to Portland area: 4.0 fewer miles x 365 days x 2.0 million metro population x $ 0.40/mile = $1.1 billion annual income savings

Time Savings Travel 2.8 billion fewer person miles per year (2.2 million people * 365 days * 4 miles) Value of travel time estimated at $15/hour Savings in travel time 100 million hours (at 27 miles per hour) Value of time saved: $1.5 billion

Corroborating Evidence Consumer Spending Vehicle Purchases Gasoline Sales

Portland spends less on transportation Portland 15.1% of consumer expenditures Average of 26 Largest Metro Areas 19.1% of consumer expenditures 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% (Source: Impresa analysis of Department of Labor data)

Portland residents buy fewer new cars Oregon 46 Vehicles per 1,000 Population United States 55 Vehicles per 1,000 population 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 (Source: Impresa analysis of National Automobile Dealers Association data)

Portland residents buy less gasoline Oregon 53.5 million BTU per capita United States 59.6 million BTU per capita 0 20 40 60 80 (Source: Impresa analysis of Energy Information Administration data)

How Portland does it More Compact Development Urban Growth Boundary Less Sprawl Alternatives to Auto Travel Transit Bicycling Personal Choices

Compact Land Use Portland s Urban Growth Boundary Limits on exclusionary zoning

Portland s jobs sprawl less Job Sprawl Index: Ratio of Jobs 10 to 25 miles From CBD to Jobs less than 3 miles from CBD Job Sprawl Index, 2004 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Portland--Salem, OR--WA CM ource: Impresa calculations from County Business Pattern data)

Less Economic Segregation 0 20 40 60 80 100 Economic Segregation Index: Percent of High income households that would have to move to balance high and low income households to regional average in each neighborhood) Portland-Vancouver, OR-WA PMSA Source: Lewis Mumford Institute)

Portland residents ride transit more Portland 13.3% Commute by Transit United States 6.5% Commute by Transit 0% 5% 10% 15% (Source: American Community Survey, 2005)

Portland residents seven times as likely to bicycle to work Portland 3.5% of commuters bicycle to work Average for Cities of 85,000 plus 0.4% of commuters bicycle to work 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% (Source: Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2005)

Most Hybrids Per Capita Portland, OR San Francisco, Monterey, CA Santa Barbara, Los Angeles Bend, OR Washington, DC San Diego Charlottesville, VA Eugene Seattle Honolulu Eureka Sacramento Denver Hybrids per 1,000 Households, 2006 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Source: http://www.hybridcars.com/market-dashboard/feb07-regional.html

Happier Citizen Commuters Portland 60% rate transportation system good or excellent Average of Metro Areas 35% rate transportation system good or excellent 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% (Source: Impresa analysis of Riley Research survey data)

Well-Educated Portlanders much more likely to take transit Percent of College-educated adults with access to transit who report using transit, 1999 San Diego Riverside Portland Phoenix Milwaukie Miami Kansas City Fort Worth Dallas Columbus Charlotte Buffalo Anaheim Less than College College Grads 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Source: Impresa calculations from Census AHS data

New Arrivals are More Likely to Use Transit In Every Age Group Heavy Transit Users (13 Times or More Per Month) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 16 to 18 Between 19 and 24 From 25 to 34 From 35 to 44 From 45 to 54 From 55 to 64 From 65 to 74 Recent Migrants Long Time Residents (> 5 Years) 75 or over Source: 2004 Tri-Met Segmentation Survey

More Local Spending Spending on cars and fuel leaves the regional economy Other spending has less leakage $1 billion in additional local purchasing power for all other industries

More Restaurants Portland MSA Restaurants per 10,000 population 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Median

And, yes, Lower Carbon Emissions 2 million people drive 4 miles less per day, yielding 8 million fewer miles per day At 20 miles per gallon, that saves 400,000 gallons of gas At 19.4 pounds of CO 2 emitted per gallon, 365 days a year that saves 1.4 million tons per year

The Green Dividend A Huge Opportunity A Great Opportunity for Every City

Oregon s Economic Transformation Employment in Oregon (Thousands) 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 - Wood Products High Tech 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000

Metropolitan Portland Metrics Definition: 7 Counties 2.1 Million Residents 50,000 Businesses with Payroll 1,100,000 Workers A $96 Billion Gross Domestic Product

The Silicon Forest Leading designer & producer of: Semiconductors Semiconductor Manufacturing Equipment Display Technologies Largest Center for Intel

Knowledge Driven Growth # of Patents 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 Tektronix in 89: 50 % Intel in 98: 36 % 0 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 Source: Mayer, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

The Ecology of the Silicon Forest Heike Mayer. 2002 -- used by permission

Talented Young Workers and the Prospects for Economic Prosperity

Fewer 25 to 34 year-olds U.S. 25 to 34 Year Old Population 1990: 43.5 Million 2000: 39.6 Million Today 3.9 Million Fewer a 9% Decline

Big Shifts Among Metros % Change 25-34 year-olds, 199-40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 50 Most Populous Metro Areas Average of Top 50 Metros

Biggest Shifts in Talented 25-34s Change in College Educated 25-34s Rank Metropolitan Area Change, 1990-2000 2 Charlotte, NC MSA 56.6% 3 Austin--San Marcos, TX MSA 56.2% 4 Portland Vancouver--Salem, OR--WA CMSA 50.0% 5 Atlanta, GA MSA 46.2% 6 Denver--Boulder--Greeley, CO CMSA 40.1% 42 St. Louis, MO, MSA -0.7% 45 New Orleans, LA MSA -4.3% 49 Providence, RI MSA -7.0%

Talent now seeks place Thinking about how you will look for and choose your next job, which of the following statements best reflects your opinion? (Asked of 1,000 25-34 year old college graduates) Look for the best job I can find. The place where it located is pretty much a secondary consideration. Look for a job in a place that I would like to live 0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Close-In Neighborhoods Matter Close-in defined: Within 3 miles of Central Business District Total Population: 9 million (2000) Young adult preference for close-in living relative to other Americans 1980: +10% Greater 1990: +12% Greater 2000: +30% Greater Young adult close-in preference increased in all 50 large metro areas between 1990-2000

Close-in Neighborhoods Key Concentration of College-educated 25-34 year-olds 3 miles from CBD Growth of 25 to 34 year-olds 1990 to 2000 +30 Percent Share of 25 to 34 year-olds with a 4-year degree 54 Percent

Impresa For More Information www.impresaconsulting.com

Close-In Neighborhoods Matter Close-in defined: Within 3 miles of Central Business District Total Population: 9 million (2000) Young adult preference for close-in living relative to other Americans 1980: +10% Greater 1990: +12% Greater 2000: +30% Greater Young adult close-in preference increased in all 50 large metro areas between 1990-2000