Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

Similar documents
Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

Village of West Dundee IL 31 & IL 72 Red Light Running (RLR) Statistical Analysis Report May 14, 2018

Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

US Rt. 12/20/45 at US Rt. 20 <Westbound and Southbound>

Foster Ave and Harlem Ave. RLR Crash Data and Analysis

Village of Schiller Park Automated Red Light Enforcement Program

Red Light Camera Frequently Asked Questions

OPTION I. Pay the Fine

Village of Lombard Automated Red Light Enforcement Program. OPTION I. Pay the Fine

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY 14, 2018

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

P.L. 2007, c.348 Approved January 13, 2008

VILLAGE OF TOLONO CHAMPAIGN COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO O- 5 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TOLONO MUNICIPAL CODE TO REGULATE GOLF CARTS

NTSB Recommendations to Reduce Speeding-Related Crashes

Town of Centreville Automated Speed Enforcement Program

Red Light Cameras in Austin. Austin Police Department Highway Enforcement Command

RTE. 1 at RTE. 637 & RTE. 639

Automated Photo Enforcement Annual Report 2015

Highway Safety Existing Installations Future Installations Issues

Calvert County s Automated Speed Enforcement Program Frequently Asked Questions

Automated Red Light Camera Enforcement

Reviewed by: Ofc. Michael Luedtke Effective Date: July 7, 1995 Authorized by: Asst. Chief Gregory Scott Revision Date: April 10, 2017

THE MYTHS OF PHOTO RADAR EXPOSED

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

The City of Salisbury s Automated Speed Enforcement Program Frequently Asked Questions

POLICE OFFICER (ASSIGNED AS TRAFFIC SPECIALIST) EXAM READING LIST

University of Hartford Golf Cart/Utility Vehicle Policy & Procedures. Revised

BOARD POLICIES. DIVISION XI Campus Police POLICY NUMBER [1] DATE Adopted 1980 Edited 1982 Revised 9/92, 3/00, 12/02, 10/13

Speed Limit Study: Traffic Engineering Report

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL

VILLAGE OF PALESTINE, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO O- /O

June Safety Measurement System Changes

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Department of Legislative Services

A9 Data Monitoring and Analysis Report. March Content. 1. Executive Summary and Key Findings. 2. Overview. 3. Purpose

TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS. Overview Data

BRANDON POLICE SERVICE th Street Brandon, Manitoba R7A 6Z3 Telephone: (204)

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2007 Session FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE

BERKELEY POLICE DEPARTMENT. DATE ISSUED: July 12, 2010 GENERAL ORDER V-2 PURPOSE

POLICIES, PROCEDURES, AND RULES

DOT HS April 2013

2016 Community Report New Mexico

Florida Strategic Highway Safety Planning Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Update and Performance Overview

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

ORDINANCE NO. 536 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE USE AND REGULATION OF GOLF CARTS WITHIN THE VILLAGE OF GRIDLEY, MCLEAN COUNTY, ILLINOIS

Evaluation of Cedar Rapids Automated Traffic Enforcement Report - Primary Highway System

SpeedGuard Radar Speed Reporting System

Department of Legislative Services

COLLISION CONSULTANTS AND INVESTIGATIONS

Alberta Speeding Convictions and Collisions Involving Unsafe Speed

6-8-1: NONHIGHWAY VEHICLES ALLOWED: 6-8-2: DEFINITIONS: 6-8-3: RULES AND REGULATIONS:

IFTA LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMITTEE BEST PRACTICES GUIDE OCTOBER 2016 IFTA

2016 Community Report Los Alamos County

USC Upstate Policy For The Safe Operation of Golf Carts, Accessibility Carts, Low Speed and Utility Vehicles on Campus

WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY BOARD OF GOVERNORS POLICY 28. REGULATION OF PARKING AND TRAFFIC West Virginia University and Its Regional Campuses

2015 Community Report White Rock

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

2014 Community Report Portales

2014 Community Report Luna County

2016 Community Report Torrance County

2015 Community Report Torrance County

2016 Community Report De Baca County

2016 Community Report Portales

CITY OF SALEM, ILLINOIS ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION APPLICATION AND INSPECTION REPORT (GOLF CARS) Applicant Name:

2015 Community Report Grants

2015 Community Report Las Vegas

2014 Community Report Las Vegas

2014 Community Report Truth or Consequences

ORDINANCE NO. O-2009-XXX

2015 Community Report Tularosa

2014 Community Report Tularosa

2016 Community Report Santa Fe County

LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEE-INVOLVED FATAL INCIDENT REPORT

LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE

Colorado Revised Statutes Automated vehicle identification systems

2016 Kansas Traffic Crash Facts. Definitions

AN ORDINANCE PERMITTING AND REGULATING THE OPERATION OF GOLF CARTS ON PUBLIC STREETS WITHIN THE TOWN OF WINDSOR, NORTH CAROLINA

2015 Community Report Chaparral

2016 Community Report Aztec

2015 Community Report Aztec

2014 Community Report Aztec

2016 Community Report San Juan County

2015 Community Report San Juan County

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Permit Parking Terms and Conditions

2015 Community Report Doña Ana County

ORDINANCE NO O-015 ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE V OF CHAPTER 21 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF PONTIAC, LIVINGSTON COUNTY, ILLINOIS

BASIC 5: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE

COUNTERMEASURES THAT WORK:

2015 Community Report Los Lunas

2014 Community Report Los Lunas

traversing them. Speed dips may be installed in lieu of speed humps where the 85 th percentile speed on a street is at least 36 mph.

Illinois State Police Enforcement Initiatives. Commander Robert W. Haley Statewide Patrol Support Command

UT Martin Environmental Health & Safety Safety Procedure

Driver Medical Fitness Program Overview. RoadSafetyBC

SECTION ONE: ADMINISTRATION AUTHORITY PARKING REGULATIONS DISABLED PARKING PARKING CITATION AUTHORITY...

Act 229 Evaluation Report

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 H 2 HOUSE BILL 469* Committee Substitute Favorable 4/24/17

Transcription:

Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/11-208.6 Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System: (k-7) A municipality or county operating an automated traffic law enforcement system shall conduct a statistical analysis to assess the safety impact of each automated traffic law enforcement system at an intersection following installation of the system. The statistical analysis shall be based upon the best available crash traffic and other date, and shall cover a period of time before and after installation of the system sufficient to provide a statistically valid comparison of safety impact. The statistical analysis shall be consistent with professional judgment and acceptable industry practice. The statistical analysis also shall be consistent with the data required for valid comparisons of before and after conditions and shall be conducted within a reasonable period following the installation of the automated traffic law enforcement system. The statistical analysis required by this subsection (k-7) shall be made available to the public and shall be published on the website of the municipality or county. If the statistical analysis for the 36-month period following installation of the system indicates that there has been an increase in the rate of accidents at the approach to the intersection monitored by the system, the municipality or county shall undertake additional studies to determine the cause and severity of the accidents, and may take any action that it determines is necessary or appropriate to reduce the number or severity of the accidents at that intersection. A Red Light Running (RLR) Photo Enforcement System was installed at the intersection of 159 th Street and Arthur Street on January 15, 2011, after finding limited success with other attempted measures to promote safer driving and improve compliance with traffic laws. The following statistical analysis was performed through 2015. Calendar year 2016 was not included as the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) has not yet completed collecting all data. The statistical analysis will be updated annually, as collected data becomes available from IDOT. Page 1

159 th St. & Arthur St. Calumet City, IL RLR Photo Enforcement System monitors violations occurring on the eastbound and westbound approaches of the intersection RLR Photo Enforcement System installed: January 15, 2011 Page 2

159 th St. & Arthur St. - Westbound Approach 159 th St. & Arthur St. - Eastbound Approach Page 3

159 th St. & Arthur St. - Northbound Approach Page 4

Average Daily Traffic Data was obtained from the Illinois Department of Transportation s website www.gettingaroundillinois.com. 159 th St. & Arthur St. (Westbound) 30,100 (2006) 19,200 (2010) 18,700 (2014) Page 5

Average Daily Traffic Cont d Data was obtained from the Illinois Department of Transportation s website www.gettingaroundillinois.com. 159 th St. & Arthur St. (Eastbound) 30,100 (2006) 19,200 (2010) 18,700 (2014) Page 6

Average Daily Traffic Cont d Data was obtained from the Illinois Department of Transportation s website www.gettingaroundillinois.com. 159 th St. & Arthur St. (Northbound) No historical average daily traffic counts available Page 7

Crash History and Analysis Table 1 includes crash data obtained from the Illinois Department of Transportation, detailing angle, turning, rear-end, and other type crashes occurring at the intersection pre/post RLR Photo Enforcement System installation. ALL INTERSECTION APPROACHES Crashes Rear-End (% of Total) Angle (% of Total) Turning (% of Total) Other (% of Total) Total 2008 1 33.3% 0 00.0% 2 66.7% 0 00.0% 3 2009 2 66.7% 0 00.0% 1 33.3% 0 00.0% 3 2010 4 100.0% 0 00.0% 0 00.0% 0 00.0% 4 Total 7 70.0% 0 00.0% 3 30.0% 0 00.0% 10 2008-2010 Average 2.3 0.0 1.0 0.0 3.3 RLR Camera Installation 01/15/2011 2011 1 50.0% 0 00.0% 0 00.0% 1 50.0% 2 2012 3 100.0% 0 00.0% 0 00.0% 0 00.0% 3 2013 1 50.0% 0 00.0% 0 00.0% 1 50.0% 2 2014 2 50.0% 0 00.0% 2 50.0% 0 00.0% 4 2015 1 50.0% 0 00.0% 0 00.0% 1 50.0% 2 Total 7 63.6% 0 00.0% 2 18.2% 2 18.2% 11 2012-2015 Average 1.8 0.0 0.5 0.5 2.8 Other indicates the following: Pedestrian, Pedal Cyclist, Fixed Object, Sideswipe, Head-On and Unknown Table 1 DISCLAIMER: The motor vehicle crash data referenced herein was provided by the Illinois Department of Transportation, based upon information derived from multiple sources. Any conclusions drawn from analysis of the aforementioned data are the sole responsibility of the data recipient(s). Additionally, for coding years 2015 to present, the Bureau of Data Collection uses the exact latitude/longitude supplied by the investigating law enforcement agency to locate crashes. Therefore, location data may vary in prior years, since the data prior to 2015 was physically located by bureau personnel. Given the subjective nature of the reporting process, the modifications in the incident locating protocols and the changes to the crash reporting thresholds effective 2009, the City of Calumet City acknowledges the potential for discrepancies in the final conclusions drawn. Page 8

Crash History and Analysis (continued) Table 2 includes crash data obtained from the Illinois Department of Transportation, detailing angle, turning, rear-end, and other-type crashes occurring at the intersection on the eastbound and westbound approaches only, pre/post RLR Photo Enforcement System installation. EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND APPROACHES ONLY (PHOTO ENFORCED APPROACHES) Crashes Rear-End Angle Turning Other (% of Total) Total (% of Total) (% of Total) (% of Total) 2008 1 50.0% 0 00.0% 1 50.0% 0 00.0% 2 2009 2 66.7% 0 00.0% 1 33.3% 0 00.0% 3 2010 4 100.0% 0 00.0% 0 00.0% 0 00.0% 4 Total 7 77.8% 0 00.0% 2 22.2% 0 00.0% 9 2008-2010 Average 2.3 0.0 0.7 0.0 3.0 RLR Camera Installation 01/15/2011 2011 1 50.0% 0 00.0% 0 00.0% 1 50.0% 2 2012 3 100.0% 0 00.0% 0 00.0% 0 00.0% 3 2013 1 50.0% 0 00.0% 0 00.0% 1 50.0% 2 2014 2 50.0% 0 00.0% 2 50.0% 0 00.0% 4 2015 1 50.0% 0 00.0% 0 00.0% 1 50.0% 2 Total 7 63.6% 0 00.0% 2 18.2% 2 18.2% 11 2012-2015 Average 1.8 0.0 0.5 0.5 2.8 Other indicates the following: Pedestrian, Pedal Cyclist, Fixed Object, Sideswipe, Head-On and Unknown Table 2 DISCLAIMER: The motor vehicle crash data referenced herein was provided by the Illinois Department of Transportation, based upon information derived from multiple sources. Any conclusions drawn from analysis of the aforementioned data are the sole responsibility of the data recipient(s). Additionally, for coding years 2015 to present, the Bureau of Data Collection uses the exact latitude/longitude supplied by the investigating law enforcement agency to locate crashes. Therefore, location data may vary in prior years, since the data prior to 2015 was physically located by bureau personnel. Given the subjective nature of the reporting process, the modifications in the incident locating protocols and the changes to the crash reporting thresholds effective 2009, the City of Calumet City acknowledges the potential for discrepancies in the final conclusions drawn. Page 9

Comparison of annual averages shows the total number of crashes decreasing by 15% at the intersection for all approaches and by 7% on the eastbound and westbound (photo enforced) approaches post-camera installation. The US Department of Transportation Project Development and Design Manual states that turning, angle or head-on crashes have a number of probable crash causes, to include: Large volumes of left /right turns Large total intersection volume Excessive speed on approaches Inadequate traffic control devices Poor visibility of signals While red light cameras cannot truly decrease the volume of cars entering the intersection, speed and proximity of vehicles entering an intersection or the amount of turning traffic volume, red light cameras and red light camera photo enforcement warning signs have the ability to reduce traffic crashes and improve compliance with traffic control devices. Page 10

Adjudication Experience RLR camera violations are contested and adjudicated through an administrative hearing conducted each month. Adjudication data for the City s Automated Enforcement Program is shown below in Table 3. CITY OF CALUMET CITY ADJUDICATION FOR AUTOMATED PHOTO ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM* YEAR /TOTALS LIABLE NOT LIABLE 2011 147 14 2012 187 8 2013 531 52 2014 215 29 2015 166 44 2016 391 113 2017** 79 12 TOTAL: 1,716 272 *Adjudication totals include contested violations for entire program (all RLR cameras). **2017 totals through March 2017. Table 3 The high quality video footage and photographic evidence produced by the enforcement system is a contributing factor in a majority of the contested RLR violations being upheld by the Hearing Officer. The police officers assigned to review and approve/reject potential violations are vigilant in applying the same officer discretion and criteria they would if issuing an in-person citation, resulting in only highly prosecutable violations being mailed out. Page 11