East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. Information Session, October 10, 2017

Similar documents
East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. TAC Briefing December 4, 2013

Orange Line Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements San Fernando Valley Service Council April 3, 2019

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. Community Meetings April/May, 2012

Community Open Houses November 29 December 7, 2017

Preliminary Definition of Alternatives. 3.0 Preliminary Definition of Alternatives

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study Update

Mobility Corridor Updates. Transit & Active Transportation Projects

LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (LACMTA) AND FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA)

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study

Mobility Corridor Updates. Transit & Active Transportation Projects

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis

Community Meetings. January/February 2019

bg 2017 lacmta. Metro

Study Area, Related Projects and Travel Markets

What IS BRT, Really? Not BRT and RNY

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

Community Meetings Welcome

West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor. Informational Briefing Gateway Cities Service Council April 13, 2017

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit

6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Capital Costs and Funding. Chapter 6 Evaluation of Alternatives Capital Costs

Pacific Electric Right-of-Way / West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis

soha Subject: SOHA Recommendations on Metro LRTP Draft Expenditure Plan [Measure M]

Valley Metro: Past, Present and Future. September 11, 2014

Project Scoping Report Appendix B Project Web Site. APPENDIX B Project Web Site

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

East SanFernando Valley Transit Corridor

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

SEPULVEDA PASS CORRIDOR

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Community Meetings June 2018

Welcome and Agenda. Thank you for joining us! 6:00 pm Open House. 6:30 pm Welcome & Presentation. 7:00 pm Q&A. 7:15 pm Open House Resumes

Crenshaw-Prairie Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings

I-10 West AA/EIS Pre-Screening and Tier 1 Analysis Results. Public Meeting. Wulf Grote, Director Project Development Rick Pilgrim, Project Manager

Clifton Corridor Transit Initiative. Briefing to Great Lakes Community February 11, 2016

Transit on the New NY Bridge

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Bus Rapid Transit. Jennifer Flynn and Cheryl Thole Senior Research Associates Commuter Choice Workshop January 2012 Tampa, FL

Pomona Rotary December 19, 2017

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

Project Scoping Open House Welcome

3.15 SAFETY AND SECURITY

Clifton Corridor Transit Initiative. Briefing to Medlock Area Neighborhood Association (MANA) February 15, 2016

A report on unmet San Fernando Valley. Wednesday, January 2, 2013

VAN NESS AVENUE BUS RAPID TRANSIT

Committee Report. Transportation Committee. Business Item No

WELCOME. Transit Options Amherst - Buffalo Public Workshops

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

Draft Results and Recommendations

Corridor Management Committee. March 7, 2012

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

Rolling Road (Route 638) Widening Project

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis

Regional Transit Extension Studies. Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization Passenger Rail Task Force Meeting December 17, 2013

Metro Orange Line Grade Separation Analysis and Operational Improvements Technical Study Task 10.0 Executive Summary FINAL version 5.

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

Brian Pessaro, AICP National Bus Rapid Transit Institute

6/11/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

METRO Light Rail Update

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

Exposition Corridor Transit Project

To Infill or Not to Infill?

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

Dallas CBD Second Light Rail Alignment (D2)

West Broadway Reconstruction/LRT Design. March 19, 2015

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

VAN NESS AVENUE BUS RAPID TRANSIT

Draft Results and Open House

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study Final Compendium Report. Connecting the San Fernando Valley and the Westside

Strategic Planning for Metro s Transition to Zero Emission Buses. October 2017

Welcome. Please Sign In

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

Background Information about the Metrobus 29 Lines Study

BART Silicon Valley. Berryessa Extension Project Community Update. October 27, 2010

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit

Needs and Community Characteristics

Technical Advisory Committee Meeting No. 19 July 8, 2015 Stakeholder Outreach Advisory Committee Meeting No. 15 July 9, 2015.

Green Line LRT: Beltline Segment Update April 19, 2017

Transit Project Delivery Status Report. Significant Issues

East Bay Bus Rapid Transit Project. Downtown Oakland to San Leandro International Blvd to East 14 th St

North Shore Alternatives Analysis. May 2012

Why coordinate the Van Nuys and Sepulveda Pass project studies together?

10/4/2016. October 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Federal Way Link Extension

San Fernando Valley Service Changes For December 2015

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Broward County Intermodal Center And People Mover. AASHTO Value Engineering Conference Presentation. September 1, 2009 San Diego, CA

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

EAST SAN FERNANDO VALLEY NORTH-SOUTH RAPIDWAYS APPROVE CONTRACT MODIFICATION AND NAME CHANGE

Bus Rapid Transit: Basic Design for Non-Transit Planners

US 50/SOUTH SHORE COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION PROJECT

3.17 Energy Resources

Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project

Transcription:

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor Information Session, October 10, 2017 1

Welcome and Meeting Purpose Introductions Metro Transit Corridors Planning Metro Real Estate Metro Community Relations Meeting Purpose Informal Conversation Provide Information 2

Tonight s Program Project Background Project Alternatives Maintenance Storage Facility (MSF) Metro Real Estate Information Timing and Process Next Steps Q&A 3

Project Project History Background October 2005: Metro Orange Line Opens North Hollywood to Warner Center 74 million boardings in first 10 years More than 20,000 daily boardings June 2012: Metro Orange Line Extension Opens Warner Center to Chatsworth (4 miles) East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor: May 2010: Metro becomes the Project s lead agency City of Los Angeles and FTA co-lead Metro s 2009 Long Range Transportation Plan $170 million earmarked for the Project 4

Project Project Scoping Background, Meetings Continued January 2013: Metro Completes an Alternative Analysis that considers: BRT LRT Streetcar March 2013: Public Scoping Meetings Comments (LRT vs. BRT) 87% for LRT 13% for BRT 5

Measure Measure M November 2016, Measure M passed with over 71% of the vote (needed 66% to pass) $120 billion (projected) for transportation projects by 2040 Brings $1.3 billion total available for East SFV Transit Corridor Measure M Expenditure Plan includes the following SFV projects: East SFV Transit Corridor: Groundbreaking 2021 Orange Line BRT Improvements: Groundbreaking 2019 Sepulveda Transit Corridor Phase I & II: Groundbreaking 2024 North SFV BRT Improvements: Groundbreaking 2019 North Hollywood to Pasadena BRT Groundbreaking 2020 6

Study Area and Corridor Characteristics 9.2-Mile Alignment: Metro Orange Line (MOL) to the Sylmar/San Fernando Metrolink Station: 460,000 people reside in the Study Area 7th busiest bus corridor in Metro system 2nd highest bus boardings in the SFV Nearly 25,000 boardings on an average weekday High level of transit dependency Low average bus speed ~12 mph 7

Project Alternatives No Build Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Curb or Median-running Light Rail Transit (LRT) 28 stations or 14 stations 8 Source: Metro 2017

Curb-Running BRT Total length: 9.2 miles 6.7 Miles curb-running dedicated busway on Van Nuys Blvd 2.5 Miles mixed-flow on San Fernando Road 18 Enhanced stations: Pre paid fares & NextBus Digital Signage Could be implemented soonest, largely with existing financial resources 9

Median-Running BRT Similar to Metro Orange Line (MOL) Total length: 9.2 Miles 6.7 Miles median busway on Van Nuys Blvd 2.5 Miles mixed-flow on San Fernando Road 17 Enhanced stations: Pre paid fares & NextBus Digital Signage 10

Median-Running LRT with 28 Stations Total length: 9.2 Miles 6.7 Miles median dedicated guideway on Van Nuys Blvd 2.5 Miles mixed-flow on San Fernando Road 28 Stations: Pre Paid Fares & NextBus Digital Signage Requires a new Maintenance and Storage Facility (MSF) 11

Median-Running LRT with 14 Stations Total length: 9.2 Miles 6.7 Miles median dedicated guideway on Van Nuys Blvd 2.5 Miles underground 2.5 Miles on railroad right-of-way along San Fernando Road Adjacent to San Fernando Road 14 stations (3 underground): Requires a new Maintenance and Storage Facility (MSF) 12

Comparing Features: BRT vs. LRT BRT LRT Dedicated BRT lane Enhanced Stations Vehicles: Enhanced Buses Longer buses All-door boarding Off-board fare payment Transit Signal Priority Improvements Can change run times during rush hour to meet demand Capacity: 73 passengers per bus Slower travel time (versus LRT) Does not require a Maintenance Storage Facility Dedicated rail line Light Rail Stations Vehicles: Train cars Built-in / permanent tracks All-door boarding Off-board fare payment Transit Signal Priority Improvements Can change run times during rush hour to meet demand Capacity: 200+ passengers per 2-rail cars Faster travel time and moves more people through the corridor Requires Maintenance Storage Facility

Capital Costs $3.0 Billions $2.5 $2.0 Median-Running with subway additional $1.4 Billion Measure M, R & State Funds Reserved Funds Reserved in 2009 LRTP: $170 Million $1.5 $1.3 $1.0 $0.5 $0.0 $35 Million Median-Running $402 Million Curb-Running $294 Million Median- Running without subway $1.3 Billion TSM Bus Rapid Transit Light Rail Transit

What is a Maintenance Storage Facility (MSF)? A Maintenance and Storage Facility (MSF) is a site where Metro trains are repaired, maintained, and stored Metro currently has two bus maintenance facilities in the San Fernando Valley (Chatsworth and Sun Valley) but does not have a rail MSF. Every rail line requires an MSF for repair, maintenance, and storage of train cars. 15

Current MSF Example: Expo Line Division 14 16

How were the potential sites identified? Three Sites Studied in Draft EIS/R: Option A near Van Nuys Blvd. and MOL Option B near Van Nuys and Keswick Option C near Van Nuys and Arminta Located within one-quarter-mile of the alignment 25-30 acres to accommodate this project and future rail lines in the SFV Industrial land uses desired due to the nature of MSF operations Option C Option B Option A 17

Metro Real Estate Information 18

What Services & Activities Does Metro Real Estate Perform? Owner/Tenant Outreach Title & Survey Work and Clearance Pre-Appraisal and Appraisal Pre-Acquisition, Acquisition, Negotiation, Post-Acquisition All related work and processes must be performed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 19

Why is Property Needed? Permanent property needs Project right-of-way, Maintenance Storage Facilities, stations Temporary construction staging Including staging space, equipment/material storage, construction vehicle parking, etc. Below ground easements Underground right-of-way, utility relocation and other facilities 20

Key Real Estate Acquisition Term Uniform Relocation Act and the State Act: Provide guidelines for the uniform, fair and equitable treatment of persons or businesses affected by a federally or state funded project

Acquisition and Negotiation Process Appraisal Relocation Loss of Business (If applicable) Real property appraisals Future and equipment appraisals Required for government acquisition of all interests in real property. Uniform relocation entitles business displaced by public project to compensation for certain categories Offers are made Negotiation process Time for acquisition process is about 2 years 22

Pre-Acquisition Activities Property Owner/Tenant contact Notice of Intent to Appraise Phase 1/Lead & Asbestos testing and Phase 2 Environmental Assessment (if required) Relocation Coordination

Typical Relocation Schedule Prepare Relocation Plan General Information Notices Interview potential displacees Provide Advisory Services Provide a Notice of Eligibility Provide a 90-day Informational Notice Provide a 30-day Notice to Vacate Process Relocation Claims

Next Steps for ESFV Project We are here Summer 2017 Winter 2018 Winter 2018- Spring 2018 Summer 2018 2019-2021 2021-2027/9 2027-2029 Draft EIS/R Release, Public Comment Period, Metro Responds to Comments Prepare & Distribute Final EIS/R FTA Issues Record of Decision and Metro Board Certifies Final EIS/R & Approves Project Pre- Construction Activities Project Groundbreaking and Construction Project Opening Metro Board Identifies Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) Real Estate Process (~2 years) Community Outreach Program Continues Throughout Process 25

How is the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) Recommendation Developed? Community Input The LPA Technical Feasibility Cost 26

We Want to Hear From You Written Comments due by: October 30, 2017 Submit written comments via: Walt Davis Project Manager, Metro One Gateway Plaza, M/S 99-22-5 Los Angeles, CA 90012 eastsfvtransit@metro.net www.metro.net/eastsfvtransit (818) 276-3233 All Metro meetings are held in ADA accessible facilities. Spanish translation provided. Intérprete en español 27

Q & A