Weed control in ornamental bulbs (2000). Tim Miller and Carl Libbey, WSU Mount Vernon.

Similar documents
CONCLUSIONS No crop response was observed at any time for any of the treatments in this trial.

Evaluation of Preemergence and Postemergence Systems in Field Corn in SUMMARY

Giant foxtail was effectively control with all PRE/POST and total POST treatments, 99 percent control (9/21 rating date).

Comparison of weed control programs with herbicides containing bicyclopyrone and their standards in field corn in SE Minnesota in 2013

1. Ignite 280 = glufosinate [BAYER] 2. OpTill = saflufenacil (Sharpen) + imazethapyr (Pursuit) [BASF]

Comparison of Weed Management Programs to Halex GT Herbicide in Field Corn in SE Minnesota in 2010 Date 4/21 5/22 6/3 6/16 Treatment

Sequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015.

Table 1. Application timing, plant stage, environmental conditions. Date 5/27 6/21 7/7 Treatment

Weather conditions in May were relatively dry, and affected activation of the PRE herbicides.

EVALUATION OF REFLEX AND BICYCLOPYRONE FOR WEED CONTROL IN DIRECT-SEEDED ONION

PREEMERGENCE HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATOES

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center

Table 2. Evaluation of herbicide systems to control giant ragweed in soybeans at Rochester, MN in Pest Code AMBTR YIELD Pest Name Giant ragweed

2009 Table Beet Weed Control Trials Methods: Trial No. 1: Trial No. 2: Results: Trial No. 1: Trial No. 2:

Date 5/21 Treatment. POST I Temperature (F) Air 65 Soil 70.2 Relative Humidity (%) 50 Wind (mph) 8 Soil Moisture. Adequate Corn

2018 Weed Control Update. Steve Li. Extension Specialist and Assistant Professor Auburn University

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. DuPont K4 Spring Timing Test

Spring and Fall beet variety trials were conducted in 2018 at the University of Delaware research farm near Georgetown, DE.

Evaluation of Difficult to Control Broadleaf Weeds with an HPPD Herbicide Based Program in Soybean in SE Minnesota in 2015.

Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Jeffrey L. Gunsolus, Reed Searcy, and Jared Liebenow

Evaluation of Difficult to Control Broadleaf Weeds with an HPPD Herbicide Based Program in Soybean in SE Minnesota in 2016.

Bromacil, Diuron, and Flumioxazin Combinations for Total Vegetation Control

11/22/2009 (C18 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 13 University of Georgia. Managing GR Palmer amaranth in LL and RR cotton.

Southern Illinois University

Control of Little Barley in No-Till Wheat.

TREATMENT OF ONION BULBS WITH "SURROUND" TO REDUCE TEMPERATURE AND BULB SUNSCALD

Comparisons of PRE/POST Weed Control Programs in Field Corn at Rochester, MN in 2015

Alfalfa (06-7) Southern Illinois University. Roundup Ready Alfalfa Evaluation. Investigator: Bryan Young

SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999

A spring broccoli variety trial was conducted in 2017 at the University of Delaware research farm near Georgetown, DE.

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

Weed Control Trials in Onions

2017 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

9/14/2009 (C39 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 5 University of Georgia Twelve inch GR Palmer amaranth response to burndown herbicides.

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

Glyphosate-Resistant Marestail, Waterhemp or Palmer Amaranth Control

2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1

All treatments injured soybean on at least one evaluation. POST1 Synchrony STS plus Flexstar plus Assure II caused 15% injury on July 11.

Crop Description. Soil Moisture: Moist Emergence Date: 17/Jun/2003

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

RESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA

(09 SRR-5 UPI KFD Soy BD) Site Description Page 1 of 21 Northeast Research & Extension Center

Southern Illinois University. Trial Location

No-Till Corn Burndown.

The 2017 University of Delaware Variety Trial Notes. Victor M. Green

Control of diseases in different cultivars

Advanced Yield and Preliminary Spring Wheat Variety Performance Trials

THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

Section 4: Wheat Varieties

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Rescue Treatments in Roundup Ready Soybeans

Switchgrass plot following the 2011 harvest at Central Grasslands Research Extension Center, Streeter, ND.

Title: 2012 Off-Station Spring Barley evaluations in the Western Triangle Area

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center Postemergence Weed Control in Green Pea

Variety testing of Lolium perenne, Dactylis glomerata and Festuca arundinacea

2017 South Dakota Field Pea Variety Trial Results

Spring Wheat Variety Screening in the Klamath Basin Donald R. Clark, Jim E. Smith, and Greg Chilcote 1 A

Miscellaneous, Including Horseradish and Wheat

LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy. Roundup GPA Test

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS. Emmalea Ernest & Gordon Johnson

Influence of AMS on Drift Reduction Antagonisms.

Wisconsin winter wheat performance tests: 2012

(FORAG9-02) AOV Means Table Page 1 of 4 University of Georgia, CES Tolerance of newly-sprigged forage bermudagrass to broadleaf herbicides.

Southern Illinois University Marestail and Waterhemp Control in No-Till Enlist Soybeans with Burndown plus Residual.

CRW/Standard Efficacy Final Report 5 December 2011

EFFECTS OF HEATING AND FREEZING ON TRANSLUCENT SCALE IN ONION BULBS

2016 Cotton Insect Update

Crop Stage at Each Application. Weed Stage at Each Application. Weed Density

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Valor PRE Test

Trial report. Variety testing of. Poa pratensis, Festuca rubra, Lolium perenne, Dactylis glomerata and Festuca arundinacea. Second year harvest

H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 10 FT BORDER FRONT

Southern Illinois University. General Trial Information. Trial Location. Personnel. Pest Description. Maintenance.

Southern Illinois University Bicyclopyrone: Tolerance and Efficacy in Horseradish - Site 2 - Low Weed Pressure.

2010 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Pumpkin Herbicide Trials, R. Allen Straw Area Specialist Virginia Cooperative Extension

2005 DRY BEAN RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT. Mick Canevari, Farm Advisor. San Joaquin County ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CONTRIBUTING AUTHOR

LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy. Command Extra/Gauntlet Test

Cooperator/Landowner Cooperator: Mel Grove Organization: ISK Biosciences City: Houston State/Prov: TX

Triticale and Rye Forage

2015 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

2016 South Dakota Spring Wheat Variety Trial Results

Evaluation of winter wheat variety performance in off-station trials near Moccasin, Denton, Fort Benton, Moore, and Winifred

SHELBY COUNTY STATE BANK 2011 CORN RESEARCH PLOT

Nov (16S-CORT-SOY-08) ARM Site Description Page 1 of 15 Purdue Weed Science. Xtend Soybean System Compared to Competitor.

PROJECT TITLE: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: CONTRIBUTORS: 2018 STATEWIDE DURUM VARIETY TRIALS

Off-station winter wheat cultivar performance on fallow in central Montana. D.M. Wichman CARC Research Agronomist, Moccasin, Montana.

Trial seeding dates, locations, average yields, and average test weights are as follows:

2017 New York Alfalfa Yield Trials; Cornell University; J. Hansen and D. Viands

Smooth Crabgrass Control in Common Bermudagrass with Pendulum Formulations

Mini Seedless Watermelon Variety Trial Results 2018

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Roundup Formulation and Tank Mix Test #1

Smooth Crabgrass Control in 'KY 31' Tall Fescue with Pendulum Formulations

EVALUATION OF REDUCED RISK INSECTICIDES FOR CODLING MOTH MANAGEMENT IN ENGLISH WALNUTS 2005

I~I. Horticulture Series No. 631

Glyphosate and 2,4-D Burndown.

(Forage2-06) Site Description Page 1 of 5 University of GA Coop Ext Service. Dogfennel Control in Pastures

Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Form

2018 Soybean Variety Performance Test Results

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2015

Transcription:

Weed control in ornamental bulbs (2000). Tim Miller and Carl Libbey, WSU Mount Vernon. Four studies were conducted in ornamental bulbs during 1999-2000: (1) bulb herbicide plant-back study, (2) nonselective, postemergence herbicide timing trial, (3) pea herbicide plant-back study, and (4) paraquat rate and timing study on 1 st -year daffodils. Plant materials for all these studies were kindly donated by Washington Bulb Co., LeFeber Bulb Co., Skagit Valley Bulb Farm, and Hulbert Farms. Materials and Methods. Bulb herbicide plant-back study. Plots were established in the fall of 1999 (1999-2000 study) at WSU Mount Vernon. Visor, Prowl, Devrinol, diuron, Surflan, and Gallery herbicides (each mixed with 3 pints Roundup/acre) plus a Roundup-only check were applied preemergence to Negrita tulip, Dutch Master narcissus, and Blue Ribbon iris. This was the second iteration of this study. In the 1999-2000 study, weed control was evaluated March 30 and May 26, 2000. When the three bulb types were in bloom, the total number of blooms and 10 random flower heights were recorded. Narcissus, tulip, and iris bulbs were harvested in July and August and yield determined. In the fall of 1999, tulips (cv. Blenda ), winter wheat, and cabbage seed plants were planted into the 1998-99 herbicide trial for the rotational crop phase of this study. In the spring, potato, green pea, cucumber and spinach seed were also planted. Weed control in these rotational crops were conventional herbicide programs typical for each crop. These rotational crops were monitored for injury from carryover of the herbicides used in ornamental bulbs applied in fall of 1998. Injury assessment was based on crop density, height, biomass, and/or yield. Nonselective, postemergence herbicide timing study. Plots were established in the fall of 1999 at WSU Mount Vernon. Iris varieties were Blue Ribbon, Polar Ice, Blue Diamond, and Telstar; narcissus varieties were Standard Value, Dutch Master, and Ice Follies; and tulip varieties were Negrita, Merry Widow, Ile de France, and Apeldoorn. Roundup, Touchdown, Finale, Aim, and Gramoxone was applied postemergence to bulbs at one of two timings (early and late), and an untreated check was also established. Iris and narcissus were sprayed February 11 and February 24, 2000; tulips were sprayed February 24 and March 6. Foliage injury was evaluated March 30, and the total number of blooms and height of six flowers were recorded when the three bulb types were in bloom. Narcissus, tulip, and iris bulbs were harvested in July and August and yield determined.

Pea herbicide plant-back study. Plots were established in the spring of 1999 in Charo green peas at WSU Mount Vernon. Raptor, Prowl, Treflan, Command, and Spartan herbicides were applied either preplant incorporated or preemergence. Following pea harvest, plots were planted to Negrita tulip and treated with preemergence Surflan + Devrinol + Roundup in the fall of 1999. The total number of blooms and heights of ten flowers were recorded in April, 2000. Bulbs were harvested in July and yield determined. The statistical design for all field studies was a randomized complete block designs with four replicates. Results. Bulb herbicide plant-back study (Tables 1-3). Weed control through March 30 was excellent for all treatments, but most products failed to maintain that level of control through the spring. Visor and diuron continued to show excellent weed control through May 26, however (91 and 92%, respectively). Flower number and flower height was not reduced by any treatment. Most products did not significantly affect bulb yield except for Visor in tulip resulting in less total yield than in the Roundup-only treatment. Surflan in narcissus resulted in total bulb weights similar to those from the Roundup-only treatment, which were less than from any of the other products. These total bulb weights did not result in smaller bulbs, however, as none of the average bulb weights were significantly different. There was only limited effects of these herbicides on rotational crops in the 1999-2000 growing season. The only significant response was in cucumber weights, and all were at least statistically equal to the Roundup-only treatment. It did appear, however, that Devrinol and diuron might have caused some reduction of cucumber weight when compared to the top yielding treatment (Gallery). The rotational iteration is being repeated during 2000-01. Nonselective, postemergence herbicide timing study. Tulip (Tables 6 and 7). Application of Roundup, Touchdown or Finale to tulips emerged to less than 1" was generally safe to foliage and did not significantly reduce total bulb number, total bulb weight, or average bulb weight. Flower number and flower height, however, were reduced at this timing with Roundup or Touchdown. Weed control was excellent with all treatments except for Aim. Narcissuss (Tables 8 and 9). Application with Roundup or Touchdown applied to narcissus up to 6 inches tall or Finale up to 3" tall did not cause significant injury to foliage, flowers, or bulb yield parameters. As with tulips, weed control was excellent with all treatments except for Aim. Iris (Tables 10 and 11). Application with Roundup or Touchdown applied to iris up to 6 inches tall did not cause significant injury to foliage, but application of Finale, Aim, and Gramoxone caused moderate to severe foliage burn to all iris 4 inches tall or more. Flower number was reduced by treatment with Roundup after irises were 4 inches tall; no other product resulted in reduction of flower number. Flower height was slightly reduced by most treatments applied to iris taller than 4 inches. None of these treatments, however, significantly reduced any bulb yield parameters. As with tulips, weed control was excellent with all treatments except for Aim. Pea herbicide plant-back study (Table 12). None of the pea herbicides applied in 1999 significantly reduced flower number, flower height, total bulb number, total bulb weight, or average bulb weight of tulips grown during 1999-2000.

Table 1. Effect of herbicides on ornamental bulbs (1999-2000). Weed control Flower number Flower height Treatments a Rate 3/30 5/26 Tulip Narcissus Iris Tulip Narcissus Iris product/a ------ % ------ ----------- per plot --------- ------------ cm ------------- Visor 3 pt 93 91 52 102 9 35 35 37 Prowl 7.2 pt 98 75 63 106 11 36 36 45 Devrinol2 lb 90 50 61 97 10 36 36 41 Diuron 4 lb 100 92 61 104 9 35 35 37 Surflan 3 pt 95 81 68 99 9 36 36 42 Gallery 10.7 oz 100 76 57 102 9 36 36 43 Untreated 55 0 66 98 7 38 35 42 LSD 0.05 11 15 ns ns ns ns ns ns a All treatments, including the check, were mixed with 3 pt/a Roundup Ultra. Table 2. Effect of herbicides on ornamental bulbs (1999-2000). Total bulb number Total bulb weight Average bulb weight Treatments a Rate Tulip Narcissus Iris Tulip Narcissus Iris Tulip Narcissus Iris product/a ------------ per plot --------------- ---------- kg per plot ------------ ---------------- g ------------------ Visor 3 pt 432 108 571 3.9 11.9 3.4 9.3 111.7 5.9 Prowl 7.2 pt 472 120 657 4.8 11.9 4.2 10.3 99.7 6.4 Devrinol2 lb 500 107 634 4.9 11.3 3.9 9.9 105.7 6.1 Diuron 4 lb 509 97 700 4.6 11.1 4.4 9.0 113.9 6.3 Surflan 3 pt 516 99 673 5.2 9.5 4.3 10.1 96.6 6.4 Gallery 10.7 oz 494 102 626 4.5 11.6 4.0 9.1 115.5 6.3 Untreated 493 87 594 4.6 9.0 3.1 9.3 104.2 5.1 LSD 0.05 ns ns ns 0.3 1.3 ns ns ns ns a All treatments, including the check, were mixed with 3 pt/a Roundup Ultra.

Table 3. Effect of herbicides used in ornamental bulbs (1998) on rotational crops (1999-2000). Potato Pea Wheat Spinach Cabbage Tulip Tulip Cuke Cuke Treatments a Rate weight yield weight seed wt. biomass number height number weight product/a kg/plot tons/a kg/plot g/5 pl. g/2 pl. per plot cm per plot kg/plot Visor 3 pt 3.2 1.9 2.0 144 532 43 30 76 4.0 Prowl 7.2 pt 3.0 2.3 2.3 186 514 46 26 68 3.2 Devrinol2 lb 3.4 2.0 2.4 153 507 41 27 60 2.4 Diuron 4 lb 3.5 2.2 2.2 154 485 43 28 62 2.8 Surflan 3 pt 3.1 2.1 2.2 129 421 40 27 81 3.8 Gallery 10.7 oz 2.6 2.4 1.8 120 495 47 29 74 4.3 Untreated 3.2 2.1 2.4 85 401 47 28 60 3.3 LSD 0.05 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns 1.2 a All treatments, including the check, were mixed with 3 pt/a Roundup Ultra. Table 4. Height of tulip, narcissus, and iris at the time of application of nonselective, postermergence herbicides (2000) Tulip height Narcissus height Iris height Cultivar 2/24 3/6 Cultivar 2/11 2/24 Cultivar 2/11 2/24 in in in in in in Apeldoorn 1 2 Dutch Master 3 6 Blue Diamond 5 5 Ile de France 2 4 Ice Follies 2 3 Blue Ribbon 4 6 Merry Widow 2 3 Standard Value 1 3 Polar Ice 5 6 Negrita 2 4 Telstar 4 5 Table 5. Application data for nonselective, postermergence herbicides (2000) Herbicide Treatment a Active ingredient Rate Rate type product/a ai/a Roundup glyphosate 1.5 pt 0.75 lb Translocating Touchdown sulfosate 1.2 pt 0.75 lb Translocating Finale glufosinate 6 pt 0.75 lb Contact Aim carfentrazone 2 oz 0.05 lb Contact Gramoxone paraquat 2.4 pt 0.75 lb Contact a All treatments made at 12.5 gallons per acre.

Table 6. Effect of several nonselective herbicides applied at two timings on tulip. Variety 2/24 3/6 2/24 3/6 2/24 3/6 2/24 3/6 2/24 3/6 Untreated LSD 0.05 Foliage Injury (%) Apeldoorn 1 18 5 14 4 30 11 40 9 29 0 8 Ile de France 5 15 9 8 16 25 68 90 25 45 0 10 Merry Widow 11 19 18 13 15 43 39 75 20 68 0 15 Negrita 13 25 13 15 19 33 28 93 19 50 0 11 Weed Control (%) Apeldoorn 100 100 100 100 98 100 0 0 73 98 0 20 Ile de France 99 100 100 100 95 96 0 18 100 100 0 24 Merry Widow 100 100 100 100 95 100 0 0 100 100 0 2 Negrita 100 100 100 100 95 99 0 3 98 99 0 4 Flower Number Apeldoorn 53 40 56 42 59 56 58 57 60 53 60 7 Ile de France 34 35 39 29 47 41 38 28 43 43 45 6 Merry Widow 28 31 32 35 42 39 42 22 46 39 44 6 Negrita 40 46 46 42 46 51 38 21 48 42 52 9 Flower Height (cm) Apeldoorn 38 18 39 21 42 33 41 38 41 34 42 4 Ile de France 28 15 29 18 26 17 22 9 29 19 38 5 Merry Widow 9 8 18 8 23 14 18 7 21 12 27 3 Negrita 22 13 23 12 28 19 25 10 31 19 36 5

Table 7. Effect of several nonselective herbicides applied at two timings on tulip. Variety 2/24 3/6 2/24 3/6 2/24 3/6 2/24 3/6 2/24 3/6 Untreated LSD 0.05 Total Bulb Number (no./plot) Apeldoorn 139 107 142 135 133 105 124 99 125 98 127 20 Ile de France 88 89 96 79 69 63 66 65 67 71 77 14 Merry Widow 201 129 188 132 190 125 156 138 160 111 155 33 Negrita 121 58 102 66 78 65 75 72 83 66 89 15 Total Bulb Weight (g/plot) Apeldoorn 1493 611 1610 797 1509 887 1233 826 1472 723 1445 182 Ile de France 753 450 875 471 537 285 338 280 537 246 833 99 Merry Widow 858 370 835 422 881 517 828 544 1003 286 1071 198 Negrita 627 188 684 222 544 248 363 256 608 228 811 129 Average Bulb Weight (g) Apeldoorn 10.8 5.7 11.4 6.0 11.3 8.4 10.0 8.4 11.8 7.5 11.4 1.3 Ile de France 8.6 5.8 9.4 6.0 7.7 4.5 5.2 4.3 8.0 3.5 10.9 1.2 Merry Widow 4.4 2.9 4.5 3.1 4.6 4.3 5.7 4.3 6.8 2.6 7.3 2.1 Negrita 5.2 3.2 6.7 3.4 6.9 3.9 4.8 3.6 7.4 3.5 9.2 1.4

Table 8. Effect of several nonselective herbicides applied at two timings on narcissus. Variety 2/11 2/24 2/11 2/24 2/11 2/24 2/11 2/24 2/11 2/24 Untreated LSD 0.05 Foliage Injury (%) Dutch Master 0 0 1 3 5 8 23 53 10 11 0 8 Ice Follies 0 3 3 3 3 10 11 38 6 13 0 6 Standard Value 0 0 0 5 8 0 4 Weed Control (%) Dutch Master 91 100 95 100 91 97 30 15 100 99 0 16 Ice Follies 89 100 95 100 97 95 10 24 100 99 0 20 Standard Value 90 100 93 94 0 0 6 Flower Number Dutch Master 23 24 22 23 22 20 16 18 23 22 19 4 Ice Follies 25 24 22 26 25 25 23 21 23 22 22 ns Standard Value 14 16 15 14 14 17 ns Flower Height (cm) Dutch Master 34 34 35 33 36 35 25 20 33 33 34 3 Ice Follies 33 34 33 32 33 32 32 19 34 33 31 3 Standard Value 43 43 44 44 44 44 ns Table 9. Effect of several nonselective herbicides applied at two timings on narcissus. Variety 2/11 2/24 2/11 2/24 2/11 2/24 2/11 2/24 2/11 2/24 Untreated LSD 0.05 Total Bulb Number (no./plot) Dutch Master 23 24 23 22 24 22 22 22 23 21 20 ns Ice Follies 26 21 20 26 27 26 21 21 22 27 25 ns Standard Value 15 15 18 18 15 17 ns Total Bulb Weight (g/plot) Dutch Master 2308 2450 2207 2333 2379 2108 1843 1608 2216 2236 2105 ns Ice Follies 2178 2089 1956 2049 2168 1907 1863 1517 2409 1811 1923 ns Standard Value 2012 2227 2367 1995 1742 2160 298 Average Bulb Weight (g) Dutch Master 110 105 98 109 103 98 85 80 98 116 106 ns Ice Follies 87 104 100 80 82 75 88 73 112 69 80 22 Standard Value 136 149 133 113 116 131 ns

Table 10. Effect of several nonselective herbicides applied at two timings on iris. Variety 2/11 2/24 2/11 2/24 2/11 2/24 2/11 2/24 2/11 2/24 Untreated LSD 0.05 Foliage Injury (%) Blue Diamond 0 4 9 8 21 0 5 Blue Ribbon 1 8 5 1 11 11 20 20 23 26 1 6 Polar Ice 1 5 4 5 8 11 20 23 26 26 0 7 Telstar 0 1 10 14 16 0 5 Weed Control (%) Blue Diamond 97 100 95 100 8 0 10 Blue Ribbon 92 100 85 100 93 100 14 0 100 100 0 14 Polar Ice 96 100 83 100 89 98 8 13 100 100 0 14 Telstar 97 100 95 95 14 0 8 Flower Number Blue Diamond 14 9 16 18 18 18 5 Blue Ribbon 8 5 8 10 7 6 7 6 6 7 7 ns Polar Ice 16 18 26 22 28 27 31 27 30 30 29 8 Telstar 8 6 7 8 9 8 ns Flower Height (cm) Blue Diamond 41 39 46 39 41 44 ns Blue Ribbon 39 28 35 34 34 33 33 39 29 31 41 8 Polar Ice 38 34 39 38 42 41 42 42 39 36 44 4 Telstar 41 37 40 38 40 48 ns

Table 11. Effect of several nonselective herbicides applied at two timings on iris. Variety 2/11 2/24 2/11 2/24 2/11 2/24 2/11 2/24 2/11 2/24 Untreated LSD 0.05 Total Bulb Number (no./plot) Blue Diamond 165 157 160 168 165 139 ns Blue Ribbon 149 126 154 149 136 118 137 143 129 150 136 ns Polar Ice 129 150 139 116 136 138 148 130 143 157 134 ns Telstar 147 148 142 159 140 139 ns Total Bulb Weight (g/plot) Blue Diamond 748 646 757 776 695 668 ns Blue Ribbon 880 640 742 873 717 763 737 743 683 683 691 ns Polar Ice 513 519 606 469 560 568 552 461 621 550 546 ns Telstar 544 544 545 558 443 512 ns Average Bulb Weight (g) Blue Diamond 4.6 4.2 4.7 4.6 4.2 4.8 ns Blue Ribbon 5.9 5.1 4.8 5.9 5.3 6.5 5.4 5.2 5.3 4.6 5.1 2.0 Polar Ice 4.0 3.5 4.4 4.2 4.2 4.1 3.7 3.6 4.4 3.5 4.1 ns Telstar 3.7 3.7 3.9 3.5 3.2 3.6 ns Table 12. Effect of pea herbicides (1999) on rotationally-grown tulips (1999-2000). Pea Flower Flower Tot. bulb Tot. bulb Avg. bulb herbicide Rate number height number weight weight product/a per plot cm per plot g per plot g Raptor 4.1 floz 48 35 112 1021 9.1 Raptor 5.1 floz 48 34 104 986 9.5 Prowl 2.4 pt 48 33 106 922 8.7 Raptor + Prowl 4.1 floz + 2.4 pt 52 35 113 1067 9.5 Treflan 1.5 pt 45 32 109 950 8.7 Command 1 pt 47 34 93 941 10.6 Spartan 5.3 oz 45 32 96 830 8.7 Untreated 49 34 112 982 8.8 LSD 0.05 ns ns ns ns ns