Proposed Program of Interrelated Projects

Similar documents
DART Capital Program Update

D2 - CBD Second Alignment

DART Priorities Overview

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

Appendix A. Project Development Decision Points

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Needs and Community Characteristics

Energy Technical Memorandum

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

Maryland Gets to Work

STRATEGIES FOR TAKING ADVANTAGE OF TRANSIT COMPLETE TRANSIT NETWORK

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

DFW HSR Station Plans People Movers Hyperloop

The Latest on Joint Development Policy Guidance

Program. presented by: September 22, 2010

Valley Metro: Past, Present and Future. September 11, 2014

Green Line LRT: Beltline Segment Update April 19, 2017

Central City Line Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) Amendment Public Hearing. July 24, 2014

BART Silicon Valley. Berryessa Extension Project Community Update. October 27, 2010

KANSAS CITY STREETCAR

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Dismantling the Streetcar System:

DRAFT Subject to modifications

UNION STATION MASTER PLAN STUDY

Attachment 5 Eglinton West LRT Planning and Technical Update

Click to edit Master title style

Overview of Regional Commuter Rail Webinar: Phoenix, Arizona December 18, 2013

North Shore Alternatives Analysis. May 2012

August 2, 2010 Public Meeting

Leadership NC. November 8, 2018

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

5 RAPID TRANSIT NETWORK PLAN PRINCIPLES, METROLINX BUSINESS CASE, AND ALTERNATIVE FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT ANALYSIS UPDATE

New Haven Hartford Springfield Rail

2017 MAX Program. Red & Blue Line Platform Extension. John Rhone Vice President, Capital Design & Construction June 22, 2017

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

Link LRT: Maintenance Bases, Vehicles and Operations for ST2 Expansion

PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP. Current Status & Next Steps

Sales and Use Transportation Tax Implementation Plan

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Alternatives Analysis Findings Report

Status of Plans March Presented by CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor. Informational Briefing Gateway Cities Service Council April 13, 2017

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

State Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

2.1 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Expand regional rapid transit networks STRATEGIC DIRECTION

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Regional Transportation District. Dave Genova Interim General Manager and CEO August 21, 2015

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

Background Information for MPRB Community Advisory Committee for 2010 Southwest Light Rail Transit Project DEIS Comment Letter Section 2

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions

Note: The October 2007 version of this report has been updated in this December 2008 report to present costs in year 2007 dollars.

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis

METRONext. Vision & Moving Forward Plans. Board Workshop. December 11, DRAFT For Preliminary Discussion Only

Planning of the HSR Network

Chapter 7: Travel Demand Analysis. Chapter 8. Plan Scenarios. LaSalle Community Center. Image Credit: Town of LaSalle

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

THE WAY WE MOVE LRT FOR EVERYONE

4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Regional Transit Extension Studies. Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization Passenger Rail Task Force Meeting December 17, 2013

Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: August 30, SUBJECT: Scarborough Rt Strategic Plan

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

METRO Light Rail Update

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Downtown Hartford Transit Circulation and Through-Routing Study Transit Operations Planning Services

Draft Results and Recommendations

Overview of Transit Funding and Planning in the PACTS Region

US 59 (SOUTHWEST FWY) IH 610 (West Loop) to SH 288 (South Fwy)

Chapter 9 Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative and Alternatives for Evaluation in Draft SEIS/SEIR

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. TAC Briefing December 4, 2013

Mass Transit in Charlotte and San Antonio. Keith T. Parker, AICP

Draft Results and Open House

NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP)

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

Parking Management Element

Charlotte Gateway Station A State & City Partnership June 24, 2015

Charlotte Area Transit System: Moving Forward John Lewis CATS Chief Executive Officer

South Dallas-Waxahachie Corridor Strategy Meeting. June 2, 2009

Rail~Volution 2005 Hal Ryan Johnson, AICP, Bus Rapid Transit Project Manager Utah Transit Authority September 7, 2005

Feasibility Study. Community Meeting March, North-South Commuter Rail Feasibility Study

Regional Commuter and Intercity Passenger Rail in Arizona

Dallas CBD Second Light Rail Alignment (D2)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE January 17, CONTACT: Mayor s Press Office

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Transcription:

DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT Proposed Program of Interrelated Projects Federal Transit Administration Capital Investment Program Summer 204 INTRODUCTION The current federal transportation bill, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 2st Century (MAP-2), contains provisions for a program of interrelated projects within the Fixed Guideway Capital Investment Grants program. A program of interrelated projects is defined as the simultaneous development of any combination of two or more fixed guideway and/or core capacity capital projects. Core capacity is a newly defined category in MAP-2 for which final guidance is not yet available, but in which Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) is taking an active role with the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and the American Public Transportation Association (APTA) to define. DART proposes to advance a Program of Interrelated Projects with the FTA totaling between $500 million to $900 million to satisfy a number of system capacity and growth related issues in a coordinated and efficient manner. The program consists of two Core Capacity projects and one Small Starts project that are interconnected. Additional projects may be defined in the future to supplement the above program. These could include bus system or lower-cost infrastructure improvements that improve capacity, travel time, reliability and operating efficiencies. Interface of D2 and high speed rail within the context of the Downtown Dallas 360 Plan. DFW adds 08,000 people, ranks 3rd in growth. Existing Light Rail Transit Alignment Downtown Dallas 2nd LRT Alignment (D2) Phase of D2 Phase 2 of D2 (post 2030) Proposed High Speed Rail to Houston Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington added 08,000 people, the third-largest population increase in the nation behind Houston and New York, according to new estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau for the 2 months that ended July (203). Fort Worth Star-Telegram, Thursday, Mar. 27, 204

THE NEED DART operates its four existing Light Rail Transit (LRT) lines (Red, Blue, Orange and Green) through one existing at-grade transit mall, all on 5-minute peak service. This results in an average 3.75-minute combined headway through the Dallas Central Business District (CBD). The current operations represent the practical operating capacity without compromising schedule reliability during the peak headway period. Station platforms on the Red and Blue lines outside of the Dallas CBD can only accommodate 2-car trains (330 passengers), while the Green and Orange lines were built to accommodate 3-car trains (495 passengers). Platform extensions and Phase of D2 can increase the core capacity of the system by relocating one or more lines to the second LRT alignment, thereby freeing up space for service on the existing mall. The city of Dallas and DART entered into an interlocal agreement in 99 to plan, design, and construct a second LRT alignment when specific thresholds in ridership and headways were met. It is anticipated that with continued high regional growth, regional rail expansion, and the introduction of the privately-funded high speed rail project that these thresholds could be reached within the next decade. System Demands 3.0 REGIONAL GROWTH HIGH SPEED RAIL SERVICE AREA REGIONAL RAIL OTHER TRANSIT PROVIDERS Percentage of Population Growth Since 970 The Dallas-Fort Worth region has grown faster than the state and nation. 9.8 million In addition to light rail transit, two separate streetcar systems operate in downtown Dallas: the McKinney Avenue Trolley (M-Line) to the north and the Dallas Streetcar, a modern streetcar line under construction, to the south. A central streetcar link connecting these two systems is needed to provide additional access, circulation and capacity between the numerous activity centers within and surrounding the Dallas CBD. Percent Growth 6.6 million 2.0.0 2.4 million 0.0 970 980 990 2000 200 2020 2035 U.S. Growth Texas Growth Dallas-Fort Worth Region Growth 2

Benefits of Core Capacity Improvements 70% 60% 67 % TOTAL CAPACITY INCREASE D2 PHASE 34% THE PROJECTS The three projects proposed for the program will increase core capacity and maximize the overall capacity of the existing LRT system while completing the central link of the Dallas streetcar network within the CBD. Combined, they will support revitalization around Union Station, a multimodal passenger transportation hub serving LRT, bus, Amtrak and the Dallas-to-Fort Worth Trinity Railway Express (TRE) commuter rail, while enhancing local circulation and access. PERCENT INCREASE 50% 40% 30% 20% 0% 0% RED LINE PLATFORM EXTENSIONS 22% BLUE LINE PLATFORM EXTENSIONS % Lastly, the projects will provide the needed capacity to meet future demands associated with an extensive regional rail plan, continued strong population and employment growth in the region and in downtown Dallas, and a privately-funded high speed rail line between Dallas and Houston, anticipated to open in 202. Program of Interrelated Projects Addressing Capacity CORRIDOR CAPACITY Each of the projects could be implemented on their own. By itself, Phase of D2 increases capacity to downtown by 34 percent. This is accomplished by rerouting the Orange Line through downtown Dallas to the Phase alignment, allowing for an additional line to operate on the existing mall. When combined with the Red and PHASE D2 PLATFORM EXTENSIONS CENTRAL STREETCAR LINK VEHICLE CAPACITY Blue line platform extensions (22% and % capacity increase respectively), core capacity increases by a total of 67 percent, providing critical additional capacity to sustain operations and accommodate future demand. Advancing the projects under the concept of a program of interrelated projects provides for a greater benefit to the region by managing the capital outlay while providing the capacity needs in a phased but timely manner. Federal funding will be requested through FTA s Capital Investment Program drawing on the Core Capacity and Small Starts funding categories. Both D2 and the platform extensions are part of the DART long-range Transit System Plan, but are not currently funded in DART s 20-year Financial Plan. D2 is also included in the North Central Texas Council of Governments Mobility 2035 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. SYSTEM CAPACITY 3

Project detail Platform Extensions DART currently has 62 LRT stations in operation along the Red, Blue, Green and Orange lines, including the new DFW Airport Station which opens in August 204. Two additional stations soon will be under construction. Of the stations in operation, 28 platforms on the Red and Blue lines cannot accommodate 3-car trains. This project will extend each of the existing 28 platforms by approximately 00 feet, allowing for the addition of one car to the train set. This improvement will increase the carrying capacity of the system and enhance the core capacity of the network. Concurrent with the extensions, each platform will be raised to provide level boarding at all doors by the time the LRT vehicle fleet replacements begins in 2025. The additional platform length has been contemplated since the starter system was designed to provide for additional cars when demand warranted longer train sets. With regional growth and the pending high speed rail project, additional capacity will be required. Increasing the train sets from 2 to 3 cars will increase peak hour passenger capacity from 330 to 495 passengers per train. This project can be implemented in phases based on need. For example, since the Orange Line operates partially within the Red Line corridor, extending the platforms of Red Line stations located north of downtown would provide an immediate benefit by enabling the Orange Line to operate with 3-car trains. Streetcar OFFICE/RESIDENTIAL RETAIL Federal Funding Category: Core Capacity PEDESTRIAN CONCOURSE LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT 2 Concept of Young Street with LRT and Streetcar Improvements 3 Platform Extension Example Ledbetter Station Dallas Streetcar Vehicle 4

2 Phase of the Downtown Dallas 2nd LRT Alignment (D2) DART is currently conducting an Alternatives Analysis for the Downtown Dallas 2nd LRT Alignment (D2) with the financial support of an FTA grant. While the draft environmental document was published in 200, changed conditions warranted additional analysis of new alternatives. Selection of a Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) is anticipated in late 204. Based on the DART 20-year Financial Plan, the full D2 project is not affordable before year 2030. Thus, this element of the proposed program of interrelated projects consists of early construction of the northern segment of D2, Phase, from Victory Station to a terminus at a new station serving the Union Station/ Convention Center area. Two additional stations would be provided to serve new developments and interface with the existing West End Station and bus transfer center. Under Phase, the Orange Line would be rerouted to this alignment rather than continuing on the current transit mall. This new routing would allow for connections with the TRE, Green, Red and Blue LRT Lines, Amtrak, Dallas Streetcar, and future high speed rail, while providing a direct link to DFW International Airport. Phase 2, to extend the remaining segment of D2 to the east, would be implemented by DART in the future, freeing up even more capacity on the existing transit mall. Another benefit of Phase is that it links the American Airlines Center and the Kay Bailey Hutchison Convention Center. Currently, DART must provide supplemental bus shuttle service between these two venues during special events to provide additional capacity and a direct connection. Federal Funding Category: Core Capacity 3 Project Detail Map Victory VICTORY Union Station Dallas Streetcar to Oak Cliff 2 West End Central Dallas Streetcar Link M-Line Trolley to Cityplace HOUSTON FIELD West Transfer Center Rosa Parks Plaza LAMAR GRIFFIN Convention Center WOODALL RODGERS FWY Akard DART, as technical representative to the city of Dallas, is constructing the Dallas Streetcar Project from the Oak Cliff area of Dallas to Union Station. Two short extensions, one further into Oak Cliff to the Bishop Arts District, and the other two blocks further east into the CBD are funded and in the planning phase. DART also is constructing the Olive-St. Paul Streetcar Loop, which will enhance operations of the McKinney Avenue Trolley while extending it further south into Dallas to interface with LRT. As part of the program of interrelated projects, the Central Dallas Streetcar Link project will connect the Dallas Streetcar PEARL OLIVE St. Paul PACIFIC 3 MARILLA AKARD ROSS Pearl YOUNG ELM MAIN COMMERCE ST. PAUL GOOD LATIMER East Transfer Center 7 platform extensions along the north end of Red and Blue Lines CESAR CHAVEZ HARWOOD Deep Ellum DART Light Rail-Existing M-Line Trolley Dallas Streetcar Phase of D2 Central Dallas Streetcar Link High Speed Rail-Planned Potential High Speed Rail Station platform extensions along the south end of Red and Blue Lines Project to McKinney Avenue Trolley at the Olive-St. Paul Streetcar Loop on the east. This central link will provide enhanced local access, circulation and capacity within downtown, extending the reach of the LRT network. Completion of this missing segment will connect the Dallas Uptown District to the Bishop Arts District while linking key activity centers in the CBD. Additionally, until Phase 2 of D2 is completed, the streetcar alignment will serve as a second east-west rail transit connection within the CBD. DART is currently assisting the city of Dallas in the development and review of alternatives for this central link. Selection of an LPA is anticipated in 204. Federal Funding Category: Small Starts 5

CONCLUSION The proposed DART Program of Interrelated Projects consists of two Core Capacity projects and one Small Starts project that are interconnected. All projects are at a point where the required documentation and environmental clearance can be completed within the two-year project development period. Local funding is in place to complete the Project Development efforts. Small Starts Project Development Process: Central Dallas Streetcar Link MAP-2 Core Capacity Process: Phase of D2 and Platform Extensions During project development, DART will work closely with the FTA to evaluate the program and advance all projects into the engineering phase based on a construction phasing schedule that most efficiently targets capacity enhancements. This would be accomplished through a program of early action elements and longer range investments, all within a reasonable time frame as outlined in MAP-2. Proposed Schedule Program Element 205-2020 2020-2040 Program of Interrelated Projects 2 3 Project Development Phased Implementation For more information please contact Steve Salin Vice President Rail Planning 24.749.2828 High Speed Rail Phase 2 of DART Second LRT Alignment Service Begins Design & Construction Michael Miles Vice President Government Relations 24.749.2853 Regional/DART System Expansion Phased Implementation 374-054-54 CW 6