Drag Factors in Spins and on Hills

Similar documents
Overview. A Study of Lateral Vehicle Motion. 1. Road Evidence

FRONTAL OFF SET COLLISION

Physics 2. Chapter 10 problems. Prepared by Vince Zaccone For Campus Learning Assistance Services at UCSB

SHORT PAPER PCB OBLIQUE COLLISIONS ENGINEERING EQUATIONS, INPUT DATA AND MARC 1 APPLICATIONS. Dennis F. Andrews, Franco Gamero, Rudy Limpert

View Numbers and Units

General Vehicle Information

Motorcycle ATV Braking Data Analysis. Progress Report

Single Vehicle Loss of Control

The Effect of Weight Distribution on a Quarter Midget. Joey Dille

Accident Reconstruction & Vehicle Data Recovery Systems and Uses

1. What data might a car leave behind at the scene of an accident?

Driven Damped Harmonic Oscillations

Recommendations for AASHTO Superelevation Design

Friction. Coefficients of friction for rubber on roads are listed in the table. asphalt road) Dry road Wet road 0.53

EDR Case Studies Intersection Crash

Code No: R Set No. 1

B.Tech. MECHANICAL ENGINEERING (BTMEVI) Term-End Examination December, 2012 BIMEE-007 : ADVANCED DYNAMICS OF MACHINE

Page 2. The go-kart always had the same mass and used the same motor.

Pre-lab Quiz/PHYS 224 Faraday s Law and Dynamo. Your name Lab section

d / cm t 2 / s 2 Fig. 3.1

JCE4600 Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering

WEEK 4 Dynamics of Machinery

SHORT PAPER PCB IN-LINE COLLISIONS ENGINEERING EQUATIONS, INPUT DATA AND MARC 1 APPLICATIONS. Dennis F. Andrews, Franco Gamero, Rudy Limpert

Using HVE to Simulate a Nine Vehicle Accident Involving a Heavy Truck

a) Calculate the overall aerodynamic coefficient for the same temperature at altitude of 1000 m.

2.007 Design and Manufacturing I

Chapter III Geometric design of Highways. Tewodros N.

Improvement of Vehicle Dynamics by Right-and-Left Torque Vectoring System in Various Drivetrains x

III B.Tech I Semester Supplementary Examinations, May/June

Technical Report Con Rod Length, Stroke, Piston Pin Offset, Piston Motion and Dwell in the Lotus-Ford Twin Cam Engine. T. L. Duell.

MOTOR VEHICLE HANDLING AND STABILITY PREDICTION

Driven Damped Harmonic Oscillations

Application Information

CEE 320. Fall Horizontal Alignment

Simulation of Influence of Crosswind Gusts on a Four Wheeler using Matlab Simulink

R10 Set No: 1 ''' ' '' '' '' Code No: R31033

3.9 Accident Investigation Data (5.9).notebook February 28, 2018

1.3 Research Objective

Case Study UAV Use on a Crash Scene Versus Total Station Sergeant Daniel Marek Nevada Highway Patrol

Investigating and Reconstructing Rollover Crashes

Copyright Laura J Prange

Crash Test Overview Rollover Crashes

STUDENT ACTIVITY SHEET Name Period Fire Hose Friction Loss The Varying Variables for the One That Got Away Part 1

Hours / 100 Marks Seat No.

EARTH S MAGNETIC FIELD

time in seconds Amy leaves diving board

Road Accident Investigation. specialists in the UK who use mathematics to reconstruct the probable manoeuvres

Pedestrian Collisions

White Paper: The Physics of Braking Systems

ECH 4224L Unit Operations Lab I Fluid Flow FLUID FLOW. Introduction. General Description

Off-Road Benefits. Volkswagen Touareg Sourcebook

Analysis of Parametric Studies on the Impact of Piston Velocity Profile On the Performance of a Single Cylinder Diesel Engine

CHAPTER 4 : RESISTANCE TO PROGRESS OF A VEHICLE - MEASUREMENT METHOD ON THE ROAD - SIMULATION ON A CHASSIS DYNAMOMETER

Post-Impact Dynamics for Vehicles with a High Yaw Velocity


Bill the Cat, tied to a rope, is twirled around in a vertical circle. Draw the free-body diagram for Bill in the positions shown. Then sum the X and

9/13/2017. Friction, Springs and Scales. Mid term exams. Summary. Investigating friction. Physics 1010: Dr. Eleanor Hodby

Lecture 5 : Static Lateral Stability and Control. or how not to move like a crab. G. Leng, Flight Dynamics, Stability & Control

The University of Melbourne Engineering Mechanics

Studying the Positioning Accuracy

6: Vehicle Performance

Development of Crash Wall Design Loads from Theoretical Train Impact

Introduction: Electromagnetism:

12/25/2015. Chapter 20. Cams. Mohammad Suliman Abuhiba, Ph.D., PE

Electromagnetic Induction, Faraday s Experiment

Simplified Vehicle Models

Impacts of Short Tube Orifice Flow and Geometrical Parameters on Flow Discharge Coefficient Characteristics

Chapter 9 Motion Exam Question Pack

SHORT PAPER PCB OBLIQUE COLLISIONS ENGINEERING EQUATIONS, INPUT DATA AND MARC 1 APPLICATIONS. Dennis F. Andrews, Franco Gamero, Rudy Limpert

Jones and Mueller Matrices for Linear Retarders. Zero and Multiple Order Linear Retarders. Angle-Dependence of Linear Retarders

4023 Senior Design Spring 2017

Hovercraft

ME6401 KINEMATICS OF MACHINERY UNIT- I (Basics of Mechanism)

Driving dynamics and hybrid combined in the torque vectoring

Estimating the Speed of a Motor Vehicle in a Collision

Dynamics Cart Accessory Track Set (2.2m version)

The Poznań University of Technology Faculty of Engineering Management. Technique lead-in - Friction exercises

Testing of Shopping Trolley Castors

Performance means how fast will it go? How fast will it climb? How quickly it will take-off and land? How far it will go?

Faraday's Law of Induction

Fundamentals of steam turbine systems

Motional emf. as long as the velocity, field, and length are mutually perpendicular.

Dynamics Cart Accessory Track Set (1.2m version)

Extracting Tire Model Parameters From Test Data

Lab 4 Constant Acceleration by Drew Von Maluski

Objective: Students will create scatter plots given data in a table. Students will then do regressions to model the data.

Technical Milestone Report: Robotic Unicycle Mechanics & Control

CH16: Clutches, Brakes, Couplings and Flywheels

Crash Data Presentation NAPARS Crash Conference

Riverhawk Company 215 Clinton Road New Hartford NY (315) Free-Flex Flexural Pivot Engineering Data

Friction and Momentum

Chapter 7. Magnetic Fields. 7.1 Purpose. 7.2 Introduction

FIRSTRANKER. 2. (a) Distinguish (by neat sketches) betweenpeaucellier mechanism and Hart mechanism.

ABS. Prof. R.G. Longoria Spring v. 1. ME 379M/397 Vehicle System Dynamics and Control

Faraday's Law of Induction

Centripetal Force * Takashi Sato. Based on Centripetal Force by OpenStax

Thinking distance in metres. Draw a ring around the correct answer to complete each sentence. One of the values of stopping distance is incorrect.

Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Engineering & Technology Lahore(KSK Campus).

MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. Engineering. Theory & Practice. Vibration & Rubber Engineering Solutions

Angular Momentum Problems Challenge Problems

Transcription:

Drag Factors in Spins and on Hills John Daily Jackson Hole Scientific Investigations, Inc. Box 2206 Jackson, WY 83001 (307) 733-4559 jhsi@rmisp.com Drag Factor Adjustment Adjusting the drag factor for road alignments or conditions is a normal crash reconstruction procedure. The basic drag factor equation: f = µncosθ + sinθ (general) f = µn + m (10% or less slope)

Drag Factor Adjustment, cont d. In these equations: µ = surface friction coefficient θ = road slope in degrees n = percentage of braking m = slope of road in percent (decimal) Either of these equations work for a constant road slope. What if the slope of the road varies as the skid progresses?

Drag Factor Adjustment, cont d. This scale profile drawing illustrates the skidding path of a vehicle on a county road. The skid starts on the level surface and then progresses to different downhill slopes. We must account for the changing slope if we are to compute the correct speed.

Drag Factor Adjustment, cont d. In this case, the initial investigators considered only the steepest part of the slope. In addition, the skid mark was measured short by the vehicle wheelbase. The speed computed was 34 mph. The proper way to handle the problem is to compute drag factors for each section of constant slope. This information is then put into the combined speed equation. When this is done, the computed speed rises to 41 mph. Adjustments for Spin Vehicles may spin out after a collision or may rotate into a spin after entering a critical speed yaw. Sometimes only one or two of the wheels have any effective braking, perhaps due to damage. Sometimes, there is no driver applied braking. The drag on the free-rolling tires will be a function of the angle the tires make with respect to the vehicle motion. The minimum level drag factor for a free-rolling wheel is about 0.01. To examine this situation, we will consider the following analysis

This vehicle has come to rest after impact, leaving the tire marks shown. If we confuse these tire marks with critical speed yaw marks, we will calculate an erroneous speed. The speed we calculate will likely be too high. The following procedure will help us determine a more accurate speed. We will calculate drag factors for small distance increments and will use the combined speed equation. Plot the vehicle back at its skid initiation point. Draw a station line parallel to the initial velocity vector of the vehicle. Draw offset lines perpendicular to the station line every 10 or 20 feet.

Plot the vehicle heading by placing the vehicle back on its tire marks, locating the center of mass on the appropriate offset line. Determine velocity vector bearing tangent to the vehicle path at each CM location. The angle the vehicle makes with respect to its velocity will be the difference between bearing and heading. Use the CAD program to determine the center of mass distance moved between each offset line. Once we know this information, we can calculate the drag factor for this vehicle for each distance increment. We may then calculate speed using a combined speed equation. For this example, we will use µ= 0.75

Distance θ Sin θ f = µnsinθ+m f n d n 10.7 12.207.155 1.65 11.1 42.669.501 5.56 11.7 64.898.673 7.87 11.6 83.992.744 8.63 11.9 111.933.699 8.31 12.4 130.766.574 7.11 13.0 163.292.219 2.84 13.7 193.224.168 2.30 Total 96.1 ft Total 44.27 Post Impact Movement Use Combined Speed Equation: S = 30( f d1 + f2d2 + f3d3 +... + f n d 1 n ) S = 36.44 mph Effective Drag Factor: 0.46 Percentage of Braking: 0.61

Drag Factor Equation by Wheel f [ µ n sinθ + µ n sinθ + µ n sinθ + µ n sin ] m = θ LF LF RF RF LR LR RR RR ± f = overall drag factor µ= tire road friction by wheel n = percentage of braking (weight distribution) for each individual wheel θ= angular difference between the vehicle heading and the velocity vector (direction of travel for the center of mass). Drag Factor Equation by Wheel EXAMPLE: A crash vehicle has the following braking percentages per wheel LF = 32% RF = 32% LR = 18% RR = 18% The left front wheel is locked due to damage. The remaining wheels are free rolling.

Drag Factor Equation by Wheel The general wheel by wheel equation reduces to this: f [ µ n + µ n sin ] m = θ LF LF Rest Rest ± or [ 0.32µ + 0.68µ sin ] m f = θ ± Spin Adjustments The method allows us to compute a drag factor for each distance increment. This allows us to account for variations in braking between the wheels and accounting for the spin angle. If one or two wheels are locked, we may handle the problem in a straightforward manner by expanding the drag factor equation. We account for road slope for each distance increment.

Summary Drag factor adjustments for constant slopes are straightforward. Sometimes the slope is NOT constant, especially on city streets and county roads. The changing slope will result in a changing drag factor, which must be accounted for. Post-impact spins are not difficult to handle even if there is no braking. Plot the path, compute the angle, and account for the grade. The minimum level drag factor for any given wheel will be on the order of 0.01.