ASSUMED VERSUS ACTUAL WEIGHTS OF VEHICLE PASSENGERS

Similar documents
HAS MOTORIZATION IN THE U.S. PEAKED? PART 9: VEHICLE OWNERSHIP AND DISTANCE DRIVEN, 1984 TO 2015

TRANSPORTATION EMISSIONS IN THE CONTEXT

HAS MOTORIZATION IN THE U.S. PEAKED? PART 10: VEHICLE OWNERSHIP AND DISTANCE DRIVEN, 1984 TO 2016

HAS MOTORIZATION IN THE U.S. PEAKED? PART 5: UPDATE THROUGH 2012

FUEL-ECONOMY DISTRIBUTIONS OF PURCHASED NEW VEHICLES IN THE U.S.: MODEL YEARS 2008 AND 2014

BENEFITS OF RECENT IMPROVEMENTS IN VEHICLE FUEL ECONOMY

ON-ROAD FUEL ECONOMY OF VEHICLES

HAS MOTORIZATION IN THE U.S. PEAKED? PART 2: USE OF LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES

ENERGY INTENSITIES OF FLYING AND DRIVING

MOTORISTS' PREFERENCES FOR DIFFERENT LEVELS OF VEHICLE AUTOMATION: 2016

RELATIVE COSTS OF DRIVING ELECTRIC AND GASOLINE VEHICLES

NEW-VEHICLE MARKET SHARES OF CARS VERSUS LIGHT TRUCKS IN THE U.S.: RECENT TRENDS AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

IS THE U.S. ON THE PATH TO THE LOWEST MOTOR VEHICLE FATALITIES IN DECADES?

MOTORISTS' PREFERENCES FOR DIFFERENT LEVELS OF VEHICLE AUTOMATION

University of Michigan Eco-Driving Index (EDI) Latest data: October 2017

CONSUMER PREFERENCES REGARDING VEHICLE-RELATED SAFETY RECALLS

CONSUMER KNOWLEDGE AND USAGE

REPORT NUMBER: 111SB-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 111SB SCHOOL BUS REARVIEW MIRRORS

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 401 INTERIOR TRUNK RELEASE

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 401 INTERIOR TRUNK RELEASE

ROAD SAFETY WITH SELF-DRIVING VEHICLES: GENERAL LIMITATIONS AND ROAD SHARING

7. Author(s) Shan Bao, Michael J. Flannagan, James R. Sayer, Mitsuhiro Uchida 9. Performing Organization Name and Address

REPORT NUMBER: 111-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 111 SCHOOL BUS REARVIEW MIRRORS

LOW-BEAM HEADLAMP ILLUMINATION AT VERY HIGH ANGLES

A SURVEY OF PUBLIC OPINION ABOUT FLYING CARS

Fueling Savings: Higher Fuel Economy Standards Result In Big Savings for Consumers

Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 110 TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS

Development of Turning Templates for Various Design Vehicles

REPORT NUMBER: 111SB-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 111SB SCHOOL BUS REARVIEW MIRRORS

REPORT NUMBER: 111SB-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 111SB SCHOOL BUS REARVIEW MIRRORS

Department of Legislative Services

KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CENTER

Remote, Redesigned Air Bag Special Study Dynamic Science, Inc., Case Number ( C) 1998 Nissan Altima Texas August/1998

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 110 TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS

Air Quality Impacts of Advance Transit s Fixed Route Bus Service

Heating Comparison of Radial and Bias-Ply Tires on a B-727 Aircraft

REPORT NUMBER: 111-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 111 SCHOOL BUS REARVIEW MIRRORS

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 214S SIDE IMPACT PROTECTION (STATIC)

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 124 ACCELERATOR CONTROL SYSTEMS

REPORT NUMBER: 120-MGA

Remote, Redesigned Air Bag Special Study FOR NHTSA S INTERNAL USE ONLY Dynamic Science, Inc., Case Number ( J) 1998 Dodge Caravan Indiana

American Driving Survey,

REPORT NUMBER: 131-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 131 SCHOOL BUS PEDESTRIAN SAFETY DEVICES

Remote Combination Adaptive Driving Equipment Investigation Dynamic Science, Inc. (DSI), Case Number G 1990 Ford Bronco Arizona October

REPORT NUMBER: 120-MGA

Remote, Redesigned Air Bag Special Study FOR NHTSA S INTERNAL USE ONLY Dynamic Science, Inc., Case Number ( E) 1998 Buick Century Colorado

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 110 TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 202a Head Restraints

REPORT NO. TR-P NC SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 223 REAR IMPACT GUARDS 2007 TRANSFREIGHT TECHNOLOGY NHTSA NO.

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 225 CHILD RESTRAINT ANCHORAGE SYSTEMS LOWER AND TETHER ANCHORAGES

REPORT NUMBER: 131SB-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 131SB SCHOOL BUS PEDESTRIAN SAFETY DEVICES

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 110 TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS

Enhancing School Bus Safety and Pupil Transportation Safety

REPORT NUMBER: 114-CAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS No. 114 THEFT PROTECTION AND ROLLOWAY PREVENTION

GENERAL TESTING LABORATORIES, INC LEEDSTOWN ROAD COLONIAL BEACH, VIRGINIA 22443

REPORT NUMBER: 114-CAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS No. 114 THEFT PROTECTION AND ROLLOWAY PREVENTION

Fatal Motor Vehicle Crashes on Indian Reservations

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 104 WINDSHIELD WIPING AND WASHING SYSTEMS

LYCOMING ENGINES

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2006-NE-20-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

REPORT NUMBER: 114-CAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS No. 114 THEFT PROTECTION AND ROLLOWAY PREVENTION

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 104 WINDSHIELD WIPING AND WASHING SYSTEMS

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 110 TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS

CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR THE CHARGING OF PLUG-IN ELECTRIC VEHICLES BRANDON SCHOETTLE MICHAEL SIVAK SUSTAINABLE WORLDWIDE TRANSPORTATION

REPORT NUMBER: 114-CAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS No. 114 THEFT PROTECTION AND ROLLOWAY PREVENTION

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 114 THEFT PROTECTION

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 103 WINDSHIELD DEFROSTING AND DEFOGGING SYSTEMS

National Center for Statistics and Analysis Research and Development

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 114 THEFT PROTECTION

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 124 ACCELERATOR CONTROL SYSTEMS

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2013-NE-23-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 225 Child Restraint Anchorage Systems

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 103 WINDSHIELD DEFROSTING AND DEFOGGING SYSTEMS

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 124 ACCELERATOR CONTROL SYSTEMS

RESALE VALUES OF ELECTRIC AND CONVENTIONAL VEHICLES: RECENT TRENDS

Who has trouble reporting prior day events?

ESTIMATING THE LIVES SAVED BY SAFETY BELTS AND AIR BAGS

REPORT NUMBER: 301-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 301 FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY

FMVSS NO. 202a HEAD RESTRAINTS INDICANT TEST

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 225 Child Restraint Anchorage Systems

Remote, Redesigned Air Bag Special Study FOR NHTSA S INTERNAL USE ONLY Dynamic Science, Inc., Case Number ( E) 1998 Mercury Tracer

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 103 WINDSHIELD DEFROSTING AND DEFOGGING SYSTEMS

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 110 TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 103 WINDSHIELD DEFROSTING AND DEFOGGING SYSTEMS

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 202 HEAD RESTRAINTS STATIC REQUIREMENTS

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 225 Child Restraint Anchorage Systems

PRATT AND WHITNEY CANADA CORP.

DOT HS September NHTSA Technical Report

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 202 HEAD RESTRAINTS STATIC REQUIREMENTS

REPORT NUMBER: 301-CAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301 FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY HONDA MOTOR COMPANY 2007 HONDA ACCORD 4-DOOR SEDAN

PRATT AND WHITNEY CANADA CORP.

3.15 SAFETY AND SECURITY

FHWA/IN/JTRP-2000/23. Final Report. Sedat Gulen John Nagle John Weaver Victor Gallivan

REPORT NUMBER TR-P NC SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 124 ACCELERATOR CONTROL SYSTEMS

REPORT NUMBER: NCAP305I-MGA NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (NCAP) FMVSS No. 305 Indicant Test

MOTION NO. M Purchase of Thirty-two Double Deck Buses for Increased Passenger Capacity, Bus Replacement and Service Expansion

Eco-driving: Strategic, Tactical, and Operational Decisions of the Driver that Influence Vehicle Fuel Economy

Rates of Motor Vehicle Crashes, Injuries, and Deaths in Relation to Driver Age, United States,

2015 Community Report Grants

Transcription:

SWT-2017-1 JANUARY 2017 ASSUMED VERSUS ACTUAL WEIGHTS OF VEHICLE PASSENGERS MICHAEL SIVAK BRANDON SCHOETTLE SUSTAINABLE WORLDWIDE TRANSPORTATION

ASSUMED VERSUS ACTUAL WEIGHTS OF VEHICLE PASSENGERS Michael Sivak Brandon Schoettle The University of Michigan Sustainable Worldwide Transportation Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2150 U.S.A. Report No. SWT-2017-1 January 2017

1. Report No. SWT-2017-1 4. Title and Subtitle Assumed Versus Actual Weights of Vehicle Passengers 7. Author(s) Michael Sivak and Brandon Schoettle 9. Performing Organization Name and Address The University of Michigan Sustainable Worldwide Transportation 2901 Baxter Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2150 U.S.A. 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address The University of Michigan Sustainable Worldwide Transportation Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipientʼs Catalog No. 5. Report Date January 2017 6. Performing Organization Code 383818 8. Performing Organization Report No. SWT-2017-1 10. Work Unit no. (TRAIS) 11. Contract or Grant No. 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Information about Sustainable Worldwide Transportation is available at http://www.umich.edu/~umtriswt. 16. Abstract Passenger weight is an important parameter in road transportation because it can significantly affect the operational weight of the vehicle. In turn, the operational weight of the vehicle has important consequences for the safe structural design of vehicle components (such as suspension, wheels, and tires), and for the detrimental impact of vehicle operations on pavement longevity. These considerations are especially important for mass-transit vehicles (i.e., those transporting a substantial number of passengers at once) such as buses. Importantly, the weight of the average American adult has increased substantially during the past 50 years, but the assumed average passenger weight has not always been adjusted accordingly. This brief report analyzes the discrepancy between the current actual and assumed passenger weights, with the primary focus on buses. The analysis indicates that the current average weight of an American adult is 180 lb, while the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) regulations assume an average weight of 150 lb. Consequently, it is recommended that the FTA consider adopting 180 lb as the appropriate assumed weight. 17. Key Words Passenger weight, actual weight, assumed weight, buses 19. Security Classification (of this report) None 20. Security Classification (of this page) None 21. No. of Pages 8 18. Distribution Statement Unlimited 22. Price i

Contents Introduction... 1 Actual weight of adults in the United States... 2 Assumed weight of bus passengers... 3 Assumed weight of passengers in other transportation modes... 3 Weight of adults versus weight of children... 3 Conclusions... 4 References... 5 ii

Introduction Passenger weight is an important parameter in road transportation because it can significantly affect the operational weight of the vehicle. In turn, the operational weight of the vehicle has important consequences for the safe structural design of vehicle components (such as suspension, wheels, and tires), and for the detrimental impact of vehicle operations on pavement longevity. These considerations are especially important for mass-transit vehicles (i.e., those transporting a substantial number of passengers at once) such as buses. Importantly, the weight of the average American adult has increased substantially during the past 50 years, but the assumed average passenger weight has not always been adjusted accordingly. This brief report analyzes the discrepancy between the current actual and assumed passenger weights, with the primary focus on buses. The underlying assumption was that if an assumed weight was used in a regulation, it was used because passenger weight was an important factor within that regulation. In other words, no attempt was made to quantify the impact of any discrepancies between actual and assumed weights on passenger safety or pavement maintenance. 1

Actual weight of adults in the United States Table 1 shows the mean weights of American males and females from three nationwide surveys performed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): 1960-1962 (Ogden, Fryar, Carroll, and Flegal, 2004), 2003-2006 (McDowell, Fryar, Ogden, and Flegal, 2008), and 2007-2010 (Fryar, Gu and Ogden, 2012). The increase from the 1960-1962 to the 2007-2010 survey amounted to 29.2 lb for males and 26.0 lb for females. * Another way to illustrate these changes is to point out that the average female now weighs about the same as the average male did 50 years ago. Table 1 Mean weight of adults by gender, 1960-2010 (applicable age ranges are listed in parentheses). Year Males Females 1960-1962 (20-74 years) 2003-2006 (20 years and over) 2007-2010 (20 years and over) 166.3 lb 140.2 lb 194.7 lb 164.7 lb 195.5 lb 166.2 lb According to the latest census, the U.S. population 20 years of age and older included 51.6% females and 48.4% males (U.S. Census, 2011). If the latest weight data in Table 1 (for 2007-2010) are adjusted to account for the relative proportions of males versus females in the population, the calculated average weight of an adult in the U.S. is 180.4 lb. * Given that the 1960-1962 data did not include people over 74 years of age, the listed average weights slightly overestimate the actual average weights. This is the case because the average weight of people over 74 years is lower than the average weight of all adults (Ogden, Fryar, Carroll, and Flegal, 2004). Consequently, the calculated changes slightly underestimate the actual changes. 2

Assumed weight of bus passengers In recognition of the increased weight of American adults, in March 2011, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) issued a proposed rulemaking that would increase the assumed average weight of a passenger (for calculating fully loaded bus weight) from the current 150 lb to 175 lb (FTA, 2011). However, in response to legislation directing the FTA to establish new pass/fail standards that require a more comprehensive review of its overall bus-testing program, this proposed rulemaking was withdrawn in December 2012 (FTA, 2012). The existing 150-lb value was then reaffirmed in the new pass/fail standard for buses issued in August 2016 (FTA, 2016). The proposed 2011 rulemaking (FTA, 2011) cited the weight data for 2003-2006 listed in Table 1. However, as shown in Table 1, the 2007-2010 survey showed that the weights of both males and females increased even further since the 2003-2006 survey. Assumed weight of passengers in other transportation modes Table 2 lists the assumed passenger weights by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (FHWA), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and U.S. Coast Guard (2010). Table 2 Assumed mean weights of persons by different transportation modes. Transportation mode Road 1 (NHTSA, 2015) Air 2 Summer 3 (FAA, 2005) Winter 4 Water 5 (U.S. Coast Guard, 2010) Males Females Combined 150 lb 200 lb 205 lb 179 lb 184 lb 190 lb 195 lb 185 lb 1 All ages; multiplied by number of seating positions to determine passenger load. 2 Adults only. 3 Includes 5 lb for clothing and 16 lb for personal items and carry-on bags. 4 Includes 10 lb for clothing and 16 lb for personal items and carry-on bags. 5 All ages; used to determine maximum passenger load for vessels. The proposed rulemaking that was withdrawn (FTA, 2011; 2012), in addition to recommending increasing the average passenger weight, also recommended increasing the amount of free floor space for standing passengers in buses from 1.5 ft 2 to 1.75 ft 2 ; the new standard retained the current value of 1.5 ft 2 (FTA, 2016). 3

Weight of adults versus weight of children The weights considered in this report were for adults 20 years of age or older. Obviously, including children in the calculations would reduce the average weight. However, given that it is possible (and highly likely under certain circumstances) for a bus to transport adults exclusively, it is reasonable that the assumed average weight be based on adults only. Conclusions To be effective (as well as accurate), assumed passenger weights should reflect reality. Therefore, if the assumed passenger weight in buses is deemed important enough to be specified in regulations, the regulations should be updated to be consistent with the actual average weight of the current U.S. population. Currently, the FTA assumes average passenger weight to be 150 lb, compared with the actual average weight of 180 lb for an American adult. Indeed, the actual average female weight (the lighter of the two genders) is currently 11% higher than the assumed average weight for both genders combined. Consequently, it is recommended that the FTA consider adopting 180 lb as the appropriate assumed passenger weight. This recommendation is conservative because it only reflects the average weight of an American adult without any clothing (which the FAA estimates to average 5 lb in summer and 10 lb in winter). 4

References FAA [Federal Aviation Administration]. 2005. Aircraft weight and balance control. Available at: https://www.faa.gov/documentlibrary/media/advisory_circular/ac120-27e.pdf Fryar, C.D., Gu, Q., and Ogden, C.L. (2012). Anthropometric reference data for children and adults: United States, 2007-2010. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_11/sr11_252.pdf FTA [Federal Transit Administration]. 2011. Bus testing: Calculation of average passenger weight and test vehicle weight. Available at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/fr-2011-03-14/pdf/2011-5831.pdf FTA [Federal Transit Administration]. 2012. Bus testing: Calculation of average passenger weight and test vehicle weight. Available at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/fr- 2012-12-14/pdf/2012-30184.pdf FTA [Federal Transit Administration]. 2016. Bus testing: Establishment of performance standards, a bus model scoring system, and pass/fail standard and other program updates. Available at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/fr-2016-08-01/pdf/2016-17889.pdf McDowell, M.A., Fryar, C.D., Ogden, C.L., and Flegal, K.M. (2008). Anthropometric reference data for children and adults: United States, 2003-2006. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr010.pdf NHTSA [National Highway Traffic Safety Administration]. (2015). Requirements for manufacturers of motor vehicles ( 567.4). Available at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/cfr-2015-title49-vol6/pdf/cfr-2015-title49-vol6- part567.pdf Ogden, C.L., Fryar, C.D., Carroll, M.D., and Flegal, K.M. (2004). Mean body weight, height, and body mass index, United States 1960-2002. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ad/ad347.pdf U.S. Census. (2011). Age and sex composition: 2010. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-03.pdf 5

U.S. Coast Guard. (2010). Passenger weight and inspected vessel stability requirements; Final rule. Available at: https://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg5/cg5212/docs/fr12142010.pdf 6