FRm ENGINEERING I:ABORATORY LIBRARY

Similar documents
Plate Girder and Stiffener

Follow this and additional works at:

1-3/8" inside-to-inside dimension. length of the leg. S162

ULTIMATE STRENGTH TEST OF A HORIZONTALLY CURVED COMPOSITE BOX GIRDER. J. Hartley Daniels

2018 LOUISIANA TRANSPORTATION CONFERENCE. Mohsen Shahawy, PHD, PE

2. Runway & Crane System

Parametric study on behaviour of box girder bridges using CSi Bridge

Tests on Plate Girders Containing Web Openings and Inclined Stiffeners

Lateral Distribution of Load in Composite Box Girder Bridges

POST-WELD TREATMENT OF A WELDED BRIDGE GIRDER BY ULTRASONIC IMPACT TREATMENT

DeltaStud - Lightweight Steel Framing

FATIGUE OF CURVED STEEL BRIDGE ELE~lliNTS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF PLATE GIRDER AND BOX GIRDER TEST ASSEMBLIES. Submitted by

The effectiveness of CFRP strengthening of steel plate girders with web opening subjected to shear

Constructability Testing of Folded Plate Girders

Eurocode 3 Design of steel structures

Strength of horizontal curved plate girders.

TEST REPORT. Ceram Reference: (QT21489/2/SL)/Ref: 1.0A. Tensile and Frictional Tests on the Fast Fit BeamClamp Systems.

Finite Element Analysis of Clutch Piston Seal

Transverse Distribution Calculation and Analysis of Strengthened Yingjing Bridge

Supreme. Supreme Framing System. Product Catalog IAPMO UNIFORM ER #0313

UT Lift 1.2. Users Guide. Developed at: The University of Texas at Austin. Funded by the Texas Department of Transportation Project (0-5574)

IBC 2009/2012 COMPLIANT. Supreme Framing System. Product Catalog

Performances of Ductile Fuses in Reducing Seismic Demand on Connections of Concentrically Steel Braced Frames

GENERAL INFORMATION FEATURES.

4.5 COMPOSITE STEEL AND CONCRETE

Effect of internal diaphragms on fatigue strength of curved box girders, Feb (DOT- FH ) 61p FHWA-RD

Fatigue tests of welded plate girders in shear, November 1965

SSC Case Study V Container Ship Recurring Failure of Side Longitudinal Passing through a Web Frame

2507 (IBC 2006 ONLY) 3054 (IBC 2006 ONLY) Supreme Framing System Product Catalog

Pipe Strut vs. Laced Strut

Secondly, most crane specifications have evolved

Technical Information

Analysis Methods for Skewed Structures. Analysis Types: Line girder model Crossframe Effects Ignored

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS

Lateral web deflection of welded test girders, June 1966

INFLUENCE OF CROSS FORCES AND BENDING MOMENTS ON REFERENCE TORQUE SENSORS FOR TORQUE WRENCH CALIBRATION

USING NSBA S LRFD SIMON SOFTWARE FOR PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF A CURVED HAUNCHED STEEL PLATE GIRDER BRIDGE

U.S. PATENT NO.: US 7,765,771 TECHNICAL GUIDE SUPERIOR ENGINEERED FLOOR FRAMING SYSTEM

VEHICLE ANTI-ROLL BAR ANALYZED USING FEA TOOL ANSYS

OPTIMUM DESIGN OF OVERHEAD CRANE GIRDERS UNDER MOVING LOADS

Munich Fire Tests on Membrane Action

Influence of cross beam spacing on load distribution factor at girder bridges

Case Study of Bridge Load Rating in KY using BrR. C.Y. Yong, P.E., S.E., ENV-SP

Gantry Girders in India

Purlins and Girts. A division of Canam Group

STATIC AND FATIGUE ANALYSIS OF LEAF SPRING-AS A REVIEW

ArcelorMittal Europe - Long products Sections and Merchant Bars HISTAR. Innovative high strength steels for economical steel structures

Structural Analysis of Pick-Up Truck Chassis using Fem

FLUSH SEAT DESIGN GUIDE FOR USE WITH ECOSPAN COMPOSITE JOISTS. economy THROUGH ecology. v1.3

Review of Overhead Crane and Analysis of Components Depending on Span

STANDARD SPECIFICATION

Gauge Face Wear Caused with Vehicle/Track Interaction

Case Study Involving Surface Durability and Improved Surface Finish

DEUTSCHE NORM DIN EN 10080

LIGHTWEIGHT STEEL FRAMING METRIC SECTION PROPERTIES

Comprehensive Evaluation of Fracture Critical Bridges

PIPELINE REPAIR OF CORROSION AND DENTS: A COMPARISON OF COMPOSITE REPAIRS AND STEEL SLEEVES

Side Structures in Single Side Skin Bulk Carriers

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON EFFECTIVENESS OF SHEAR STRENGTHENING OF RC BEAMS WITH CFRP SHEETS

Tyre Endurance/Low Pressure Test

DESIGN OF MACHINE MEMBERS - I

BENDING STRESS ANALYSIS OF SPUR GEAR BY USING MODIFIED LEWIS FORMULA

Design and Analysis of Front Suspension of Three Wheeler Passenger Vehicle

WARRANTY AND LIMITATIONS

Aerodynamic Investigation of Cable-stayed Bridge with 2-edge Girder

101 st T.H.E. Conference February 24,2015

EXPERIMENTAL AND FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF SKEW GIRDER BRIDGES RAVINDRA SWAROOP. Department of Applied Mechanics. Submitted

THE LONGITUDINAL VIBRATION OF COMPOSITE DRIVE SHAFT

Validation Simulation of New Railway Rolling Stock Using the Finite Element Method

International Engineering Research Journal Analysis of HCV Chassis using FEA

STRESS ANALYSIS OF SEAT BACKREST OF CAR

Static Structural and Thermal Analysis of Aluminum Alloy Piston For Design Optimization Using FEA Kashyap Vyas 1 Milan Pandya 2

Research on Test Methods of Frame Torsional Rigidity Lu JIA1,2, Huanyun DAI1 and Ye SONG1

Design Aids For Structural Welded Wire Reinforcement (Metric Units for WWR/Rebar Comparison Tables)

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

Load Analysis and Multi Body Dynamics Analysis of Connecting Rod in Single Cylinder 4 Stroke Engine

9301B 9311B 9321B 9331B 9341B 9351B 9361B 9371B

Overview. HDS replaces built-up curtain wall headers. HDS replaces load-bearing box beam headers

AN OPTIMAL PROFILE AND LEAD MODIFICATION IN CYLINDRICAL GEAR TOOTH BY REDUCING THE LOAD DISTRIBUTION FACTOR

126 Ridge Road Tel: (607) PO Box 187 Fax: (607)

Steel technology Elastic properties of steel 1071 European standards for structural steels 1072

Crashworthiness of an Electric Prototype Vehicle Series

BRE/TSLAB Vulcan Comparisons. Roger Plank Anthony Abu & Ian Burgess

Report on Rehabilitation Project of the Binh Bridge in Vietnam

Design principles and Assumptions

ASSESSING THE USE OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS IN REPAIRING MECHANICAL DAMAGE IN TRANSMISSION PIPELINES

Bondstrand 5000/5000C Product Data (Severely Corrosive Industrial Service and Oxidizing Acids)

Impact of Heavy Loads on State and Parish Bridges. Aziz Saber, Ph.D., P.E. Program Chair Civil Engineering Louisiana Tech University

Table of Contents. PrimeJoist

Chapter 10 Parametric Studies

Comparison between Experimental and Analytical Analysis of Single Ball Continuous Variable Transmission System

CONTRIBUTION TO THE CINEMATIC AND DYNAMIC STUDIES OF HYDRAULIC RADIAL PISTON MOTORS.

REPORT HOLDER: CLARKDIETRICH BUILDING SYSTEMS 9050 CENTRE POINTE DRIVE, SUITE 400 WEST CHESTER, OHIO EVALUATION SUBJECT:

ASME B31.8 INTERPRETATIONS VOLUME 13

Development of analytical process to reduce side load in strut-type suspension

The Transrapid Guideway Switch Test and Verifikation

The Effect of Friction between a Cylindrical Guide and Magnetic Tape on Lateral Tape Motion

BLAST CAPACITY ASSESSMENT AND TESTING A-60 OFFSHORE FIRE DOOR

ARI 300 Tank Car and Underframe Structural Inspection Bulletin

Plastic Hinging Considerations for Single-Column Piers Supporting Highly Curved Ramp Bridges

Transcription:

1 Submitted to the Welding Research Council Subcommittee on Lehigh University Welded Plate Girder Project FRm ENGNEERNG :ABORATORY LBRARY PROPOSAL FOR BENDNG TESTS ON LONGTUDNALLY STFFENED PLATE GRDERS by Peter B. Cooper -, Lehigh University Fritz Engineering Laboratory Report No. 304.3 February, 1964

304.3-1 ntroduction The bending strength of transversely stiffened plate girders has been investigated both theoretically and experime~tally.(1,2) n this investigation it was shown that the bending strength is limited either by yielding or by instability of the compression flange. Compression flange instability can occur by lateral, torsional or vertical buckling. For a given value of yield stress, lateral buckling depends upon the ratio of the unsupported length of the compression flange to the radius of gyration of the section consisting of the flange and one-sixth of the web, torsional (local) buckling is a function of the width-thickness ratio of )::he compression flange and vertical buckling is governed by the web slenderness or web depth-to-thickness ratio. The bending strength of a girder reinforced with both transverse and longitudinal stiffeners may also be limited either by yielding or compression flange instability, and for lateral or local (torsional) buckling of the compression flange, the relationships which were developed :".. for transversely stiffened girders can be applied. t is also possible for a longitudinal stiffener to fail laterally or locally for some geometric configurations. The resistance of a plate girder web to vertical buckling of the compression flange should be significantly increased by the use of a longitudinal stiffener. Thus, a suitably positioned and proportioned longitudinal stiffene~ should permit the use of a larger web slenderness ratio than would be safe for a girder without the longitudinal stiffener.

304.1-2 The parameters which are involved in the.vertical buckling problem are the aspect ratio a, the web sle~derness ratio ~, the yield stiffener position ~l and the stiffener rigidity ratio parameters are defined in Fig. 1. strain E, Y X. All of s the these A literature survey has shown that a relatively small amount of experimental work on longitudinally stiffened plate girders subjected to bending has been conducted. (3) Many of the tests reported in the literature were not carried to failure so that little can be learned about the failure modes. Of those tests which were taken to failure, lateral buckling of the compression flange was the most common failure mode. Therefore, very little experimental data on vertical buckling of the compression flange is available. For this reason, bending tests on longitudinally stiffened plate girders are proposed in this report.

304.3-3 Proposed Experimental Program t is proposed to conduct ultimate load tests on two longitudinally stiffened girders which are designated girders Lland L2. For each girder a central test section consisting of three panels will be subjected to pure bending (see Fig. 2). Reinforcing of failed panels should permit conducting three tests on each girder. The girders will be fabricated from ASTM A373 steel plates. Nominal values of the bas~c parameters for each test panel are listed in Table. The depth of the girders was determined on the basis that an extreme value of the web slenderness ratio should be tested. Using the thinnest practical web thickness of 1/8 in., a depth of 60 in. was selected which provides a nominal web slenderness ratio of 480. The flanges were proportibned so that the possibility of lateral or local buckling would be minimized. Lateral support to the compression flange will be provided at each trao verse stiffener (Fig. 2). The longitudinal stiffeners were located 1/5 of the web depth from the compression flange and are all one-sided stiffeners. The shear spans, transverse stiffeners, bearing stiffeners and end plates were all designed conservatively to avoid premature failure of these elements. The test section of girder Ll consists of three panels with an aspect ratio of 1.0. n order to demonstrate conclusively to what extent a longitudinal stiffener can contribute to the resistance of the web to vertical buckling of the compression flange, there is no longitudinal

304.3. -4 stiffener in panel B, while panel A has a fairly rigid stiffener. (Fig. 3). The third panel (panel C) has a stiffener with a value of r s which is less than that required by the current AASHO,... (3,4,5) Spec~f~cat~ons. British or German Girder L2 was designed to check the influence of panel size on vertical buckling strength, and thus the test section consists of one panel with an aspect ratio of 1.5 (panel A) and two with an aspect ratio of 0.75 (panels B and C). As shown in Fig. 3, r for panel B is s approximately the same as that required by the AASHO Specifications while the values of r for panels A.and C are larger than either the s AASHO or German Specification requirements and smaller than the British Specification values. During the tests, ultimate loads and load-deflection behavior of the girders will be measured. n addition to strain measurements at selected locationa on the stiffeners and webs, at least one section of each girder will be completely instrumented to measure the stress redistribution above the elasti~ buckling load. Lateral deflections of the web and stiffeners will also be measured. n addition to the girders shown in Fig. 2, it is also proposed to order a short section of girder with the same configuration as the test sections and provided with a 2-1/2" x 1/8" longitudinal stiffener. This section will be used to determine the magnitude and distribution of residual stresses using the sectioning method. t is possible that the

304.3-5 influence of residual stresses can be incorporated in analytical expressions to predict the strength of welded, longitudinally stiffened plate girders.

304.3-6 Funds and Staff t is anticipated that the proposed tests can be conducted by the present project staff. The cost of the specimens, the salaries pf the investigators and the wages of the necessary technical assistants will be paid from funds available to the project for the current 1963-1964 fiscal year. Testing equipment will be furnished at Fritz Engineering Laboratory.

304.3-7 References 1. K. Basler and B. ThUrlimann STRENGTH OF PLATE GRDERS N BENDNG, Proc:, ASCE, Vol. 87, N6:::.ST6, August, 1961 2. K. Basler, B. T. Yen, J. A. MUeller and B. Thttrlimann WEB BUCKLNG TESTS ON WELDED PLATE GRDERS, Bulletin No. 64, Welding Research Council, New York, September, 1960 3. P. Cooper LTERATURE SURVEY ON LONGTUDNALLY STFFENED PLATES, Fritz Engineering Laboratory Report 304.2, Lehigh University, September, 1963 4. American Association of State Highway Officials STANDARD SPECFCATONS FOR HGHWAY BRDGES, 1961 ~. British Standards nstitution BRTSH STANDARD 153: STEEL GRDER BRDGES, Parts 3B and 4, British Standards.House, London, 1958 6. Deutscher Normenausschuss DN 4114 (German Buckling Specifications), Blattl und 2, Beuth-VertriebGmbH, Berlin and Cologne, July, 1952 ',:-

304.3-8 GRDER Ll Panel A Panel B Panel C 0.00107 0.00107 0.00107 Y t3 480 480 480 1.0 1.0 1.0 Til 1/5 1.5., 60.8 0 13.0 s ':C.,! co', GRDER L2 Panel A Panel B Panel C 0.00107 0.00107 0.00107 y t3 480 480 480 a 1.5 0.75 0.75 Til 1/5 1/5 1/5 "s 60.8 13.0 31.0 ' Table Nominal Values of Basic Parameters

,s =tl ) ( ) ( b t... 1- " a.1 a = alb =aspect ratio f3 = bt =slenderness ratio. Ey=OY/E =yield strain 7]1 =bljb = stiffener position y =10.92s/bt! =stiffener rigidity ratio FG. - VERTCAL BUCKLNG PARAMETERS

.. ~..'. ~... "' GRDER L 12 1 xl", PANEL A B c Y4' web L1'i'x ~' ~2 l's 5"x3/ 4 ' 1.0~" 2 2X ~" 8 4~" ~" 12"x~2 2 x 8 - (typ.) (typ.) 1-2 F!:s 3"x~' ~ " ~2~s 3"x ~. Veweb 5'-0" "~ 12"X"-.l' 12"X 3 /4'----' 10'-0" 1'-6 TEST SECTON 15'-0" 1'_6 10'-0" ~. GRDER L2 P P l PANEL A B C J ~4'web ~" b 8 we 1- L 2 Y~'xY8 4Y~'x~ L'tX~8' ~ A 1-... 5' -0"! FG.2 - PROPOSED TEST GRDERS

~ 60 ~L2,A Girder L1,POnel;/S. -.',,.!. c,~.,..,. 50 / / 40 ~ 30 ~2,C 20! 10 / ~ / ~/. <c~7 "/ L2,B ell,c / - ~~ 0 ~ 'q". L1,B 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 a FG.3- ~ VALUES FOR TEST SPECMENS