IHS CHEMICAL PEP Report 29J. Steam Cracking of Crude Oil. Steam Cracking of Crude Oil. PEP Report 29J. Gajendra Khare Principal Analyst

Similar documents
CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION SUMMARY 2-1 TECHNICAL ASPECTS 2-1 ECONOMIC ASPECTS 2-2

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 211A HYDROCRACKING FOR MIDDLE DISTILLATES (July 2003)

IHS CHEMICAL Light Hydrocarbon and Light Naphtha Utilization. Process Economics Program Report 297. Light Hydrocarbon and Light Naphtha Utilization

IHS CHEMICAL High Olefins Fluid Catalytic Cracking Processes. Process Economics Program Report 195B. High Olefins Fluid Catalytic Cracking Processes

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM SRI INTERNATIONAL Menlo Park, California

Coking and Thermal Process, Delayed Coking

ETHYLENE-PROPYLENE PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM. Report No. 29A. Supplement A. by SHIGEYOSHI TAKAOKA With contributions by KIICHIRO OHYA.

Conversion Processes 1. THERMAL PROCESSES 2. CATALYTIC PROCESSES

Unit 4. Fluidised Catalytic Cracking. Assistant lecturers Belinskaya Nataliya Sergeevna Kirgina Maria Vladimirovna

Abstract Process Economics Program Report No. 203 ALKANE DEHYDROGENATION AND AROMATIZATION (September 1992)

Maximizing Refinery Margins by Petrochemical Integration

Abstract Process Economics Program Report No. 158A OCTANE IMPROVERS FOR GASOLINE (February 1992)

ACO TM, The Advanced Catalytic Olefins Process

Process Economics Program

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 21F NEW GENERATION OXO ALCOHOLS (October 2012)

PEP Review ON-PURPOSE BUTADIENE PRODUCTION By Richard Nielsen with a Contribution by Russell Heinen (June 2011)

Petroleum Refining Fourth Year Dr.Aysar T. Jarullah

Petroleum Refining Fourth Year Dr.Aysar T. Jarullah

Optimizing Distillate Yields and Product Qualities. Srini Srivatsan, Director - Coking Technology

Report No. 35 BUTADIENE. March A private report by the PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE I PARK, CALIFORNIA

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 195A ADVANCES IN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING (November 2005)

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 43D MEGA METHANOL PLANTS (December 2003)

PEP Review METHYL TERTIARY BUTYL ETHER PRODUCTION FROM STEAM CRACKER C 4 STREAM By Syed N. Naqvi (December 2012)

Catalytic Reforming for Aromatics Production. Topsoe Catalysis Forum Munkerupgaard, Denmark August 27 28, 2015 Greg Marshall GAM Engineering LLC 1

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

Refinery / Petrochemical. Integration. Gildas Rolland

Process Economics Program

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 222 PETROLEUM INDUSTRY OUTLOOK (July 1999)

HOW OIL REFINERIES WORK

Unit 1. Naphtha Catalytic Reforming. Assistant lecturers Belinskaya Nataliya Sergeevna Kirgina Maria Vladimirovna

Thermal cracking Introduction

On-Line Process Analyzers: Potential Uses and Applications

Solvent Deasphalting Conversion Enabler

HOW OIL REFINERIES WORK

PEP Review HIGH-PURITY ISOBUTYLENE PRODUCTION BY MTBE CRACKING By Sumod Kalakkunnath (December 2012)

OPPORTUNITY CRUDES: TO PROCESS OR NOT TO PROCESS?

ON-PURPOSE PROPYLENE FROM OLEFINIC STREAMS

KBR Technology Business

Process Economics Program

Refining/Petrochemical Integration A New Paradigm. Anil Khatri, GTC Technology Coking and CatCracking Conference New Delhi - October 2013

PILOT PLANT DESIGN, INSTALLATION & OPERATION Training Duration 5 days

OX0 ALCOHOLS PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM. Report No. 21. contributions by Shigeyoshi Takaoka. November A private report by the

Results Certified by Core Labs for Conoco Canada Ltd. Executive summary. Introduction

SOLVENT DEASPHALTING OPTIONS How SDA can increase residue upgrading margins

Co-Processing of Green Crude in Existing Petroleum Refineries. Algae Biomass Summit 1 October

Abstract PEP Review PROCESS ECONOMICS OF COAL-BASED OLEFINS PRODUCTION IN CHINA By R. J. Chang and Jamie Lacson (May 2012)

Reducing octane loss - solutions for FCC gasoline post-treatment services

Consulting and Training Services Available to the Petroleum Industry

Features of HS-FCC. Catalyst System. Optimized Reaction Conditions

DIESEL. Custom Catalyst Systems for Higher Yields of Diesel. Brian Watkins Manager, Hydrotreating Pilot Plant and Technical Service Engineer

HOW OIL REFINERIES WORK

Production of Transportation Fuels by Co-processing Biomass-Derived Pyrolysis Oils in a Petroleum Refinery Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit

Chemical Technology Prof. Indra D. Mall Department of Chemical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee

Increased flexibility of refineries by O 2 enrichment. Sulphur recovery and new opportunities.

FCC pre-treatment catalysts TK-558 BRIM and TK-559 BRIM for ULS gasoline using BRIM technology

Preface... xii. 1. Refinery Distillation... 1

CONVERT RESIDUE TO PETROCHEMICALS

Alkylation & Polymerization Chapter 11

Challenges and Opportunities in Managing CO 2 in Petroleum Refining

GTC TECHNOLOGY WHITE PAPER

LCO Processing Solutions. Antoine Fournier

Stephen Stanley Jose de Barros Fred Gardner Lummus Technology 1 st Indian Oil Petrochemical Conclave March 16, 2012 New Delhi

A New Refining Process for Efficient Naphtha Utilization: Parallel Operation of a C 7+ Isomerization Unit with a Reformer

CHEMSYSTEMS. Report Abstract. Petrochemical Market Dynamics Feedstocks

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 246 NEAR ZERO SULFUR DIESEL FUEL (November 2002)

Chapter 11 Gasoline Production

Renewable Liquids as Steam Cracker Feedstocks

- Supercritical Water Cracking Technology -

Maximizing FCC Light Cycle Oil Operating Strategies Introducing MIDAS -300 Catalyst for Increased Selectivity

Crude Distillation Chapter 4

A new simple and robust process FT-NIR Spectrometer with small footprint and extended maintenance interval

Refining/Petrochemical Integration-A New Paradigm Joseph C. Gentry, Director - Global Licensing Engineered to Innovate

Catalytic Cracking. Chapter 6

FCC Gasoline Treating Using Catalytic Distillation. Texas Technology Showcase March 2003, Houston, Texas. Dr. Mitchell E. Loescher

How. clean is your. fuel?

Handbook of Petroleum Processing

Zeolite Catalyst. Methanol. Propylene. Petrochemical Research & Technology پژوهش و فناوري پتروشیمی

Sensitivity analysis and determination of optimum temperature of furnace for commercial visbreaking unit

Investment Planning of an Integrated Petrochemicals Complex & Refinery A Best Practice Approach

Fischer-Tropsch Refining

CHAPTER 2 REFINERY FEED STREAMS: STREAMS FROM THE ATMOSPHERIC AND VACUUM TOWERS

Middle East DownStream Weak May 2013 ABU DHABI, UAE

Technip Stone & Webster Process Technology Offering in Refining

FCC pretreatment catalysts

Upgrade Bottom of the Barrel to Improve Your Margins

Bottom of Barrel Processing. Chapters 5 & 8

Make High Octane Gasoline from Naphtha Feeds at 1/3 of CapEx, OpEx and Emission Levels. Process and Economics. Now a commercial reality

Maximize Vacuum Residue Conversion and Processing Flexibility with the UOP Uniflex Process

Enhance Naphtha Value and Gasoline Reformer Performance Using UOP s MaxEne TM Process

Maximizing Bottom-of-the Barrel Conversion with Commercially Proven Technologies. Jacinthe Frécon

Delayed Coking. Chapter 5

PEP Review HIGH-PURITY ISOBUTYLENE FROM T-BUTANOL BY LYONDELLBASELL PROCESS By Sumod Kalakkunnath (February 2013)

Challenges and Solutions for Shale Oil Upgrading

Changing Refinery Configuration for Heavy and Synthetic Crude Processing

A Practical Approach to 10 ppm Sulfur Diesel Production

RefComm Galveston May 2017 FCC naphtha posttreatment

ANALYSIS OF ENERGY USE AND CO 2 EMISSIONS IN THE U.S. REFINING SECTOR, WITH PROJECTIONS OF HEAVIER CRUDES FOR 2025 SUPPORTING INFORMATION

Focus on Slurry Hydrocracking Uniflex Process Upgrade Bottom-of-the-Barrel to Improve Margins

Roles of Emerging FCC-based Technologies in Shifting to Petrochemicals Production

Transcription:

` IHS CHEMICAL PEP Report 29J Steam Cracking of Crude Oil December 2015 ihs.com PEP Report 29J Steam Cracking of Crude Oil Gajendra Khare Principal Analyst Michael Arné Sr. Principal Analyst

PEP Report 29J Steam Cracking of Crude Oil Gajendra Khare, Principal Analyst Michael Arné, Sr. Principal Analyst Abstract In January 2014, ExxonMobil officially opened in Singapore a novel steam cracker that produces olefins directly from crude oil. The Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Aramco) has discussed plans to build a crude-to-olefins complex. SABIC is another company that has looked into direct crude-to-olefins. In this report, we examine some of the technologies required to support the direct production of olefins from crude oil. We present process design studies for the ExxonMobil and Aramco processes. We present capital and production cost estimates for a facility in Singapore using the ExxonMobil process. We compare the ExxonMobil process in detail with traditional naphtha cracking. In particular, we present side-by-side crude oil versus naphtha comparisons of yield sets, major equipment sizes, and process economics. We also present capital and production cost estimates for a facility in Saudi Arabia using the integrated Aramco crude-to-olefins process. 2015 IHS 1 December 2015

Contents 1 Introduction 7 2 Summary 8 Conclusions 8 ExxonMobil process 9 Process description 9 Comparison of crude oil versus naphtha equipment sizes 9 Process economics 11 Comparison of crude oil versus naphtha process economics 14 Saudi Aramco process 20 Process description 20 Process economics 20 3 Industry status 24 Characteristics of the market 24 4 Technology review 26 Conventional steam cracker 26 Operating variables of steam cracking 28 Reaction temperature 28 Residence time 29 Pressure 29 Feedstock 30 Advances in pyrolysis furnace design 32 Kinetic modelling 32 Firebox design 32 Burner arrangement 33 Low-NOx burners 33 High-emissivity refractory coating 36 Radiant coil design 36 Tube metallurgy 38 Coke inhibition technology 39 Catalytic coking 40 Pyrolytic (thermal) coking 40 Aerosol coking (polyaromatic condensation) 41 Transfer line exchanger coke 41 Antifoulant additives 41 Permanent surface coatings 42 Other surface treatments 43 Crude oil steam cracking 43 Thermal cracking with partial combustion 44 Advanced cracking reactor (ACR) process 44 Dow s partial combustion oil cracking process 45 Fluidized or circulating bed cracking 45 Lurgi s sand cracker 45 BASF s fluidized coke/flow cracking 45 KK process 46 Ube s process 47 Quick contact reaction system/thermal regenerative cracking 47 Shock wave reactor (SWR) 48 ExxonMobil crude oil steam cracking technology 48 Background 49 ExxonMobil technology 51 2015 IHS 2 December 2015

Partial condensation 57 Visbreaking 59 Draft control system 60 Liquid bottom processing 60 Saudi Aramco crude oil steam cracking technology 62 Process configuration 62 Hydrocracking 64 Hydrocracking products 64 Hydrocracking reactions 65 Thermodynamics of hydrocracking 67 Reaction mechanisms 68 Activation of hydrogen 69 Hydrocracking of n-paraffins 71 Reactions of naphthenes 73 Hydrocracking of aromatics 74 Hydrocracking of vacuum residue 75 Kinetics 76 Fouling mechanisms 77 Catalysts 77 Hydrogenation component 77 Acidic component 78 Pore structure 78 Activation 79 Catalyst lifecycle 79 Pretreatment for hydrocracking 79 Hydrocracking processes 80 Hydrocracking stages 80 Two-stage 80 Single stage 82 Process factors 83 Feedstock effects 84 Process configuration effects 85 Operating conditions 86 Temperature 86 Hydrogen partial pressure 86 Ammonia partial pressure 87 Space velocity 87 Design considerations 87 Reactor 88 Residence time 88 Pressure drop 88 Corrosion 88 Ammonium bisulfide corrosion 89 H 2 S and sulfur corrosion 89 Naphthenic acid corrosion 90 Stress corrosion 90 Heat integration 90 Separations 90 High-olefins fluid catalytic cracking 91 FCC general considerations 93 Catalysts 94 The high-severity fluidized catalytic cracking process 94 Pilot plant results 94 Semi-commercial unit 96 5 ExxonMobil process 97 2015 IHS 3 December 2015

Process description 97 Pyrolysis and quench 119 Compression, drying, depropanizer 119 Subcooling and separation 120 Product separation 120 Refrigeration 120 Steam distribution 121 Process discussion 121 General considerations 121 Flash pot conditions 123 Balance of plant 124 Comparison of crude oil and naphtha feedstock cases 124 Cost estimates 126 Capital costs 126 Production costs 130 6 Saudi Aramco process 142 Process description 142 Hydrocracking 172 Fluid catalytic cracking 172 Pyrolysis and quench 173 Compression, drying, depropanizer 174 Subcooling and separation 174 Product separation 174 Refrigeration 175 Steam distribution 175 Process discussion 175 General considerations 176 Hydrocracker 176 Fluid catalytic cracking 180 Steam cracking 181 Cost estimates 184 Capital costs 184 Production costs 189 Appendix A Patent summaries 193 Appendix B Cited references 202 Appendix C Process schematic flow diagrams 208 Figures Figure 4.1 Reaction mechanism for thermal cracking 28 Figure 4.2 Typical variation in effluent composition as function of operation severity 29 Figure 4.3 Equilibrium NOx predictions for stoichiometric combustion of fuel with air 34 Figure 4.4 Equilibrium NOx predictions for combustion of CH 4 as function of excess air level 34 Figure 4.5 Adiabatic equilibrium NOx predictions for stoichiometric combustion of fuel 35 Figure 4.6 Swaged coil configurations 37 Figure 4.7 Furnace tube decoking frequency 40 Figure 4.8 ACR process 44 Figure 4.9 KK process 46 Figure 4.10 Ube process 47 Figure 4.11 Singapore refinery process overview 50 Figure 4.12 Singapore chemical plant process overview 50 Figure 4.13 Crude oil cracking using external separator (US 3617493) 51 Figure 4.14 Schematic flow diagram of furnace for cracking crude oil (US 7820035) 52 2015 IHS 4 December 2015

Figure 4.15 Schematic flow diagram of furnace for cracking crude oil (US 7820035) 55 Figure 4.16 Dual finned serpentine cooling coils with interposed sheds (US 7767170) 58 Figure 4.17 Cross-section of concentric tubes in condenser (US 7767170) 59 Figure 4.18 Flash vessel visbreaking heating element (US 7588737) 60 Figure 4.19 Integrated steam cracking process (US 8399729) 61 Figure 4.20 Block flow diagram of an integrated hydrocracking/fcc process (US 2013248419) 63 Figure 4.21 Hydrogen content and molecular weight relationship between feedstocks and products 65 Figure 4.22 Representative mono- and polyaromatics 67 Figure 4.23 Catalytic hydrocracking reaction network 69 Figure 4.24 Typical n-paraffin hydrocracking reaction pathway 72 Figure 4.25 Beta scission and isomerization mechanisms 73 Figure 4.26 Direct naphthene ring opening via non-classical carbonium ion mechanism 74 Figure 4.27 Classical mechanism of central naphthene ring opening 75 Figure 4.28 Proposed mechanism for elemental sulfur initiation of free radicals 76 Figure 4.29 Simplified two-stage hydrocracking process 81 Figure 4.30 Simplified two-stage process with separate recycle H 2 82 Figure 4.31 Reverse flow process 83 Figure 4.32 Reverse flow process 91 Figure 4.33 HS-FCC reactor and regenerator system 92 Figure 4.34 Simplified cracking reaction network 93 Tables Table 2.1 Comparison of yield sets Crude oil versus wide range naphtha 10 Table 2.2 Comparison of major equipment size differences Crude oil versus naphtha 11 Table 2.3 Ethylene from crude oil Production costs in Singapore 12 Table 2.4 Ethylene from crude oil Comparison of production costs crude oil versus naphtha 14 Table 2.5 Ethylene from crude oil Production costs in Singapore (January 2010 basis) 16 Table 2.6 Ethylene from crude oil Comparison of production costs crude oil versus naphtha 18 Table 2.7 Ethylene from crude oil Saudi Aramco process production costs 21 Table 3.1 World supply/demand for ethylene 24 Table 4.1 Effects of residence time in cracking of light naphtha 30 Table 4.2 Steam cracker yield pattern (based on 1000 lb of ethylene product) 31 Table 4.3 NOx comparison of different technologies 35 Table 4.4 Composition of common cracking tube alloys 39 Table 4.5 Product distribution of ExxonMobil Singapore complex 49 Table 4.6 Middle distillate and heavy oil products and uses 66 Table 4.7 Products of industrial hydrocracking of representative C10 hydrocarbons 68 Table 4.8 Heats of reaction 70 Table 4.9 Bond dissociation energies 70 Table 4.10 Bond rupture temperatures 70 Table 4.11 Polynuclear aromatics in desulfurized residue VGO at start and end of run 84 Table 4.12 Feedstock effects on diesel fuel quality in single stage hydrocracking 85 Table 4.13 Effect of H 2 partial pressure on product quality 87 Table 4.14 Wash water optimum values 89 Table 4.15 Properties of feed oils 95 Table 4.16 HS-FCC pilot plant product yields for various feeds 95 Table 4.17 HS-FCC semi-commercial unit product yields for Arabian Light-derived feeds 96 Table 5.1 Ethylene from crude oil Design bases 98 Table 5.2 Ethylene from crude oil Hourly stream flows 100 Table 5.3 Ethylene from crude oil Major equipment 116 Table 5.4 Crude oil assay Tapis light crude 122 Table 5.5 Cracking furnace feed characterization 123 Table 5.6 Comparison of yield sets 125 Table 5.7 Comparison of major equipment size differences 126 Table 5.8 Ethylene from crude oil total capital investment US Gulf Coast Basis 127 2015 IHS 5 December 2015

Table 5.9 Ethylene from crude oil total capital investment Singapore basis 129 Table 5.10 Ethylene from crude oil production costs US Gulf Coast basis 130 Table 5.11 Ethylene from crude oil Production costs in Singapore 132 Table 5.12 Ethylene from crude oil Production costs in Singapore 135 Table 5.13 Ethylene from crude oil Production costs in Singapore (January 2010 basis) 138 Table 5.14 Ethylene from crude oil Production costs in Singapore 140 Table 6.1 Ethylene from crude oil Aramco process Design bases 143 Table 6.2 Ethylene from crude oil Aramco process Hourly stream flows 146 Table 6.3 Ethylene from crude oil Aramco process Major equipment 167 Table 6.4 Arabian light crude oil assay 177 Table 6.5 Hydrocracker reactor yields 178 Table 6.6 Hydrocracker reactor operation details 179 Table 6.7 Hydrocracker product characteristics 180 Table 6.8 FCC selectivities 181 Table 6.9 Comparison of steam cracking yield yets 182 Table 6.10 Design case steam cracking yields 183 Table 6.11 Ethylene from crude oil Aramco process Total capital investment 185 Table 6.12 Ethylene from crude oil Aramco process Capital investment by major process 186 Table 6.13 Ethylene from crude oil Aramco process Total capital investment Saudi basis 188 Table 6.14 Ethylene from crude oil US gulf coast basis Production costs 189 Table 6.15 Ethylene from crude oil Saudi basis Production costs 191 Process schematic flow diagrams Figure 2.1 Schematic of flash pot/cracking furnace system 209 Figure 5.1 Ethylene from Naphtha front-end depropanizer Pyrolysis and quenching 210 Figure 5.1.2 Ethylene from crude oil Compression, drying, depropanizer 211 Figure 5.1.3 Ethylene from crude oil Subcooling and separation 212 Figure 5.1.4 Ethylene from crude oil Product separation 213 Figure 5.1.5 Ethylene from crude oil Refrigeration 214 Figure 5.1.6 Ethylene from crude oil Steam diagram 215 Figure 5.2 Schematic of flash pot/cracking furnace system 216 Figure 6.1 Crude oil to olefins Aramco process Hydrocracking 217 Figure 6.1.2 Crude oil to olefins Aramco process FCC unit 218 Figure 6.1.3 Crude oil to olefins Aramco process FCC unit (continued) 219 Figure 6.1.4 Ethylene from Naphtha front-end depropanizer Pyrolysis and quenching 220 Figure 6.1.5 Ethylene from Naphtha front-end depropanizer Compression, drying, depropanizer 221 Figure 6.1.6 Ethylene from Naphtha front-end depropanizer Subcooling and separation 222 Figure 6.1.7 Ethylene from Naphtha front-end depropanizer Product separation 223 Figure 6.1.8 Ethylene from Naphtha front-end depropanizer Refrigeration 224 Figure 6.1.9 Ethylene from Naphtha front-end depropanizer Steam diagram 225 Figure 6.2 Schematic of HS-FCC reaction system 226 2015 IHS 6 December 2015

IHS Customer Care: IHS Customer Care: Americas: +1 800 IHS CARE (+1 800 447 2273); CustomerCare@ihs.com Americas: Europe, +1 800 Middle IHS East, CARE and (+1 Africa: 800 447 +44 2273); (0) 1344 CustomerCare@ihs.com 328 300; Customer.Support@ihs.com Europe, Asia Middle and the East, Pacific and Africa: Rim: +604 +44 291 (0) 1344 3600; 328 SupportAPAC@ihs.com 300; Customer.Support@ihs.com Asia and the Pacific Rim: +604 291 3600; SupportAPAC@ihs.com