MULTI-TIER SCHEDULING SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION FOR. Guilford County Schools Transportation Department January 2011

Similar documents
Transportation Update. Binford Sloan, Director of Transportation, October 9, 2018 Presented to School Board

Wyoming School Funding Model Recalibration: Transportation Reimbursement Model Study

An Overview of Transportation Responsibility

MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: Recommend to Board. Final Action

MOTION NO. M Purchase of Thirty-two Double Deck Buses for Increased Passenger Capacity, Bus Replacement and Service Expansion

MOTION NO. M Purchase of Thirty-one Articulated Hybrid Diesel Expansion and Replacement Buses

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

How to Cut Costs in Transportation

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Prepared by Transportation Workgroup members: Derek Lewis, Lisa Wells, Chuck Saylors, Lynda Leventis-Wells

Agenda Item. ITEM TYPE: Report BOARD AGENDA ITEM. TITLE: Transportation Services Benchmark Report. DATE: December 13, 2017

An Asset Management Plan for Transit And Access Transit Fleet

The Funding of Pupil Transportation In North Carolina March, 2001

METRONext. Vision & Moving Forward Plans. Board Workshop. December 11, DRAFT For Preliminary Discussion Only

Frequently Asked Questions about Bus Transportation

Mississauga Transit 2009 Budget

2019 New Transit Service Plan

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

MOTION No. M Purchase of Five 40-foot Buses PROPOSED ACTION

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Agreement to Purchase Compressed Natural Gas Articulated Buses. Staff Report

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

NOTICE OF REGULARLY SCHEDULED BOARD MEETINGS

The Quality. Link. Florida School District Transportation

DART Priorities Overview

Solano County Transit

Executive Summary October 2013

JOINT FACILITIES ADVISORY COMMISSION. ART and APS Bus Parking Informational Session July 27, :30 pm

Branch Edmonton Transit

Carroll County Public Schools Transportation Services Department

MOTION NO. M Light Rail Vehicle Oil-less Rotary Scroll Air Compressor Upgrade PROPOSED ACTION

Terry Blackwell Page 1 of 5. Education North Carolina State University BS, Electrical Engineering Power Systems emphasis

Parking Management Element

2018 American Zero Emission Bus Conference INNOVATIVE CLEAN TRANSIT PROPOSED REGULATION

2011 Saskatoon Transit Services Annual Report

TheQuality. Link. Florida School District Transportation

Student Transportation

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

6/11/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Table of Contents. Page 1 of 15

Milwaukee County Transit System

Updated: July 27, 2009

Background Information about the Metrobus 29 Lines Study

Operating and Maintenance Cost Methodology Report. Durham Orange Light Rail Transit Project

Chapter 6 - Capital Improvement Program

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Activity # 91

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA

2/1/2018. February 1, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Metropolitan Council Transit Capital Improvement Plan. September 23, 2009

TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE (TCC) UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 26, 2017

MARTA s blueprint for the future. COFFEE AND CONVERSATION Kyle Keahey, More MARTA Atlanta Dec. 5, 2018

Central City Line Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) Amendment Public Hearing. July 24, 2014

Project Summary Table

Data - North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, Transportation Services (2b) Students Transported on EC Buses (NOTE 1)

Dunlap Community Unit School District #323 Balanced Scorecard. Updated 12/13/16

Oakland County Board of Commissioners General Government Committee April 23, SMART Services in Oakland County

Madison BRT Transit Corridor Study Proposed BRT Operations Plans

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

DRAFT Evaluation Scores. Transit

MSRC and Other AB 2766 Funding Opportunities

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

FAQ-Frequently Asked Questions

Asset Class 2019 Target 2020 Target 2021 Target 2022 Target 2023 Target REVENUE VEHICLES AB - Articulated Bus N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

ON-ROAD HEAVY-DUTY TRUCK APPLICATION

Zorik Pirveysian, Air Quality Policy and Management Division Manager Policy and Planning Department

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Overview of Transit Funding and Planning in the PACTS Region

Commuter Transit Service Feasibility

MUSD LCAP Community Meeting. December 17, 2014

METROPOLITIAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2018 JULY and NOVEMBER FINANCIAL PLAN BUDGET REDUCTION PROGRAM (BRPs) ($ in millions) - Fav/(Unfav)

Sean P. McBride, Executive Director Kalamazoo Metro Transit. Presentation to Michigan Transportation Planning Association July 13, 2016

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

National Treasury Presentation to the Standing Committee on Finance: South African Airways SOC Ltd ( SAA )

SamTrans Business Plan Update May 2018

Job Classifications List Salary Schedules for Administrative, Instructional Support, and Classified Employees (REVISED 01/02/2018)

1

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

FLEET SERVICES OVERVIEW and ACCOMPLISHMENTS Public Works Commission August 10, 2017

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

Clean Cities Presentation

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

The Regional Municipality of York. Purchase of Six Battery Electric Buses

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Thank you for your support of Catholic Schools. Regina Horne Transportation Director Mecklenburg Area Catholic Schools

Too Good to Throw Away Implementation Strategy

Transportation Written Plan

The Quality. Link. Florida School District Transportation Profiles. Volume

Transit Vehicle (Trolley) Technology Review

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

Proposed FY2015 Budget and Fare Increase

The Use of GPS to Optimize the Mobile Fleet. We provide the right equipment at the right place and the right time.

GODURHAM PROGRESS REPORT

Capital Needs Assessment Riders Advisory Council July2, 2008

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

2011 ANNUAL COMMITMENTS

Martha s Vineyard Regional Transit Authority

RON ROBERTS SUPERVISOR, FOURTH DISTRICT SAN DIEGO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

Item #14. DATE October 12, GCTD Board of Directors. Reed C. Caldwell Director of Engineering & Construction

Transcription:

MULTI-TIER SCHEDULING FOR SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION Guilford County Schools Transportation Department January 2011 jh

CURRENT STATUS Transportation Resources are Strained Results of remedial efforts to date: Combined under-utilized buses Reduced fleet by 10 buses to forego the purchase of additional buses. In 2008, 634 operational buses In 2009, 628 operational buses In 2010, 624 operational buses Implemented the shuttle point concept; increased ridership per bus; reduced operational buses - 2004 Increased replacement bus passenger capacity Future Concerns: Continued increased student population Ridership increase for 2010/2011 305 students Continued increased of educational programs and schools Increased bus routing requirements Federally mandated unfunded initiatives McKinney-Vento Act, NCLB Measurement of routing effectiveness and efficiency by the State will become more stringent due to State/local budget cuts Increased transportation expenditures fuel, salaries, equipment, parts

THE PROPOSAL: MULTI-TIERED SCHEDULING Opportunities To improve school bus transportation Reduce the number of buses in operation Reduce school bus costs Increase state funding Decrease local funding Provide separate transportation for middle and high school students Provide other tangible benefits to GCS

EXPLANATION MULTI-TIER SCHEDULING CONCEPT A multi-tiered schedule (MTS) assigns one bus to three or more schools to transport students to/from school each day. Utilizing the MTS concept, school instructional times are coordinated so that each bus can make up to three bus runs each morning and afternoon. School instructional times are established on three separate levels l in order to maximize i the efficient i use of school buses.

MTS CONCEPT STRATEGIES The optimal bus run time is 45 minutes Increased instructional day for elementary students by 15 minutes per day Reallocate resources to support high school option schools or other non-traditional schools to increase participation Reduce transportation expenditures by reducing the number of buses/drivers required to transport students Increase efficiency, i.e., increase state funding; decrease LEA funding allocated to the Transportation Department

CURRENT GCS INSTRUCTIONAL SCHEDULES TRADITIONAL SCHOOLS Tier 1 Elementary & Middle Schools 7:40 2:20, 7:45 2:25, 7:50 2:30, 7:55 2:35 7:30 3:05 Oak Hill Elementary 7:40 2:35 Jackson Middle & Kiser Middle Tier 2 Middle & High Schools 8:35 3:30, 8:40 3:35, 8:45 3:40, 8:50 3:45

EXAMPLE -DUDLEY/SMITH TRANSPORTATION ZONE CURRENT SCHEDULE & BUSES 2010/2011 Tier 1 7:45 2:25 Alderman, Archer, Bessemer, Foust 7:55 2:35 Frazier, Gillespie, Hunter, Peck, Vandalia 7:40 2:35 Jackson Middle Total Tier 1 Buses 55 Tier 2 8:40 3:3535 Allen, Smith 8:50 345 Hairston, Dudley Total Tier 2 Buses - 69

APPLICATION OF CRITERIA EXAMPLE: DUDLEY/SMITH TRANSPORTATION ZONE PROPOSED MULTI-TIER SCHEDULE Tier 1 7:30 2:25 Alderman, Archer, Bessemer, Foust, Frazier, Gillespie, Hunter, Peck, Vandalia 45 Buses Tier 2 8:15 3:10 Dudley, Smith 41 Buses Tier 3 9:00 3:55 Allen, Hairston, Jackson 38 Buses

APPLICATION OF THE MTS PROPOSAL FOR ALL TRADITIONAL SCHOOLS Zone Current Projected Reduction Dudley/Smith 69 45 24 Grimsley/Page 62 43 19 Andrews/HPC 50 29 21 SE/Southern 65 51 14 NW/Northern 63 58 5 NE/Eastern 62 60 2 Ragsdale/SW 60 58 2 Western 29 24 5 Total Buses 460 368 92 Redistribute 30 to 50 buses Out of Service 42 to 62 buses

ESTIMATED REDUCTION IN TRANSPORTATION EXPENDITURES Projected operating expense savings Approx annual cost to operate 1 bus = $20,575 (not including driver salaries & benefits) Range of buses taken out of service = 42 to 62 buses Potential range for reduction in operating expenditures = $864,150 to $1,275,650 Projected savings for driver salaries & benefits GCS Cost/Mile (driver salaries & benefits) = $0.62 Estimated miles a driver drives each day = 80 Estimated net decrease in miles per day per bus out of service = 50 miles 50 miles x 42 x $0.62 x 180 = $234,360 50 miles x 62 x $0.62 x 180 = $345,960 Overall Projected Savings - $1.1M to $1.6M

OTHER SAVINGS Buses taken out of service can be added in as needed for future expansion. (Considered credits by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction ) Assumed Efficiency Rate Increase 3.8% to 5.6%

CABARRUS COUNTY Implemented Three-Tier Bus Plan 2009/2010 Increase in instructional hours Additional flexibility in meeting instructional hours requirement Reduce absenteeism and turnover for bus drivers most bus drivers would become full time employees Increase safety on buses savings allotted to the purchase of video camera systems for all buses Financial benefits Tier 1 - High Schools 7:15 to 2:15 (6 elementary schools 7:30 to 2:15 Tier 2 Most Elementary Schools 8:15 3:00 Tier 3 Middle Schools 9:00 4:00

WAKE COUNTY Developed in 1993 Over a 11 year period added 40 buses instead of 160 buses based on ridership increases and new schools Reduced the overall ride time for students Saved Wake Co $100M in transportation funding Operates at 100% Efficiency Tier 1 7:30 2:15 Tier 2 8:15 3:00 Tier 3 9:15 3:45

UNION COUNTY Tier 1 Elementary 7:30 to 2:00 Tier 2 High 8:00 2:55 Tier 3 Middle 8:45 3:45 Increased Efficiency Rating 100% Leveled Expenditures

CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS Various start times for elementary and middle grade levels 7:30 1:45 Elementary 8:30 2:45 Elementary 9:15 3:30 Elementary 8:00 3:00 Middle 8:45 3:45 Middle 7:15 2:15 High

POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE ASPECTS OF MULTI-TIER SCHEDULING Positive Reduce number of buses Potential decrease in student ride time Improve student/bus ratio Negative Necessitates changes in the current traditional school instructional schedules Increase traffic by buses through neighborhoods Corresponding bell schedules Separate middle and high school bus routes Elementary schools starting 10 minutes earlier in the morning. Decrease in per bus expenditures Increase in elementary instructional day Resources are increased without spending capital funds

NEXT STEPS Develop Routing and Scheduling Plan for District Revise data in Routing System Provide Schools and Parents with New Bus Routing and Scheduling Information Advise DPI Transportation Services of Buses Taken out of Services Train Bus Drivers and Support Staff on Multi-Tier Plan and upcoming changes Implementation - August 2011 Monitor Cost Savings (Efficiency Rating September 2012)

COMMITTEE MEMBERS Carlvena Foster, Board of Education Member Tony Watlington, Strategic Planning Officer Sandra Culmer, Regional Executive Director Leigh Hebbard, Director, Athletics Erik Naglee, Director, Title 1 Laurie Hogan, District Relations Andrew LaRowe Chief Operations Officer Jeff Harris Director, Transportation Curtis Stacey, Assistant Director, Transportation Jeff Stevens, Zone Supervisor Daisy Wilkins, Zone Supervisor