Septage Treatment at Small Wastewater Treatment Plants

Similar documents
City of Alpena Septage Receiving Facility Operating Plan

The City of Sturgis Wastewater Treatment Plant Septage Waste Receiving Facility Operating Plan

Septage Receiving Made Easy: Ten Things we have Learned

Septage Land Application Module

ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT

Co-treatment of Septage with Municipal Wastewater in Medium Sized Cities in Vietnam

State of Texas Biosolids Program Perspectives

LOW OPERATING COST LOW START-UP COST. Media TM has its own built-in. the initial savings over new mechanical

When is Septage Really Septage? GLAD TO SEE YOU MADE THE MOVE!

Sludge Management EENV Overview of Sludge Treatment & Disposal

Capacity Analysis Report. For. William E. Dunn Water Reclamation Facility 4111 Dunn Drive Palm Harbor, Florida 34683

City Of London Environmental & Engineering Services Department Wastewater Treatment Operations

THE CENTRAL MARIN SANITATION AGENCY TREATMENT PLANT INITIAL ANALYSIS OF CO THICKENING PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SOLIDS

Ecosteps Laboratory Pvt. Ltd., D-79, Sector-6, Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Discipline Chemical Testing Issue Date

City of Marlette. Wastewater Treatment Facility. Septage Receiving Plan

CHAPTER 20.1 WASTEWATER HAULING. Section Definitions. For the purposes of this article, the following definitions shall apply:

High Solids Loading for a DAFT Retrofit for Co-Thickening Operation

SLUDGE TREATMENT. Do we have a problem?

PORTER TOWNSHIP CASS COUNTY, MICHIGAN PUBLIC WORKS SECTION PART 60 SEPTAGE RECEIVING ORDINANCE ORDINANCE #

Stone Food Machinery Ltd 14 North Main Street Wexford IRELAND Tel

Kentucky On-Site Septic Tank Servicing Regulations

Bio Recycling North Ranch Lagoon Proposal

SAMPLING CONTAINERS & HOLDING TIMES. Parameters Method Holding Time 8 Minimum Volume Water Sampling Water Soil Water Soil Container Preservative 9

Medical Waste Transporters

IMPLEMENTING A WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY UPGRADE/ EXPANSION USING IFAS AT WEST HAVEN, CT

Sludge Thickening/Storage Alternatives Analysis for a 225 MGD Wastewater Treatment Facility

Domestic Wastewater Program. Septage Update. Focus On Change 2017

Final Report CHARACTERIZATION OF SEPTAGE DISCHARGING TO KHIRBIT AS SAMRA TREATMENT PLANT

Secondary Digester Cleaning to Meet Ohio Sludge Rules. Timothy McCann AECOM Keith Bovard Rocky River WWTP

TITLE 252. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAPTER 645. SEPTAGE PUMPERS AND TRANSPORTERS

TASK ORDER NO. 7 CO-DIGESTION OF BIOSOLIDS AND FOOD WASTES BENCH-SCALE PILOT STUDY. Prepared by:

PRETREATMENT OF SEPTAGE AND GREASE TRAP WASTES

LOW ENERGY AERATION AND PROBIOTICS RESOLVE SLUDGE MANAGEMENT ISSUES! Adam Wilson. Coffs Harbour Water

Approval of the Proposed Miscellaneous Fees & Charges Adjustments Effective January 18, 2019 (FY 2019)

A Visionary Review of the Land Treatment of Septage International Pumper & Cleaner Environmental Expo Louisville, Kentucky

Utilities Services Item INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES

Sewerage Service Regulation, Fees and Charges Bylaw

National Association of Wastewater Transporters (NAWT) Onsite Treatment Tank Pumping & Cleaning Code of Practice

How to Survive an EPA Audit

Regulatory Impacts of Biogas-fired Internal Combustion Engines

Municipality of Dysart et al

MI WEA BIOSOLIDS CONFERENCE - MARCH Egg-Shaped Anaerobic Digestion: Shaping the Future of Digestion

Septage Disposal Ordinance for Kent County

City of Greenfield WWTP

Wastewater Treatment Facilities: A Source of Oil for Producing Biodiesel Rafael Hernandez and Todd French Mississippi State University Dave C.

NOTE: ALL PRINTED EQUIPMENT OPERATING PROCEDURES ARE CONSIDERED UNCONTROLLED UNLESS STAMPED IN RED: CONTROLLED DOCUMENT.

ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ON-SITE SEWAGE

AECOM Water. Sludge Dewatering Improvements at Gulf Coast Waste Disposal Authority s Bayport Facility

Stimulation of aerobic and anaerobic biological processes by ultrasound

Water Residuals Management Presented by Michael F. Graves, PE CP&Y Co-Authors Larry L. Hare, PE Oklahoma City J. Dustin Segraves Oklahoma City

Bidwell Porter WWTP. General Information County: Gallia Counties Served: Gallia. Type of System: Public: X Private: Year Established: 1999

CITY OF DALLAS WATER DEPARTMENT LIQUID WASTE PROGRAM APPLICATION FOR LIQUID WASTE TRANSPORTATION PERMIT

FINAL REPORT. Prepared for: ONTARIO MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT. Attention: Tony Ho. Prepared by:

INTEGRA WATER CREOLA, LLC P.O. Box Birmingham, AL Phone: Fax:

Thank you for your application for product renewal dated February 28, 2017, for the Fuji Clean USA CEN Model Series Treatment Systems.

CITY OF DENTON TRANSPORT TRUCK DISCHARGE PERMIT AGREEMENT. January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019

Approach to Aeration System Upgrade

RAS & WAS Pumps (FLYGT Pump)

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FACILIITY PERMIT EVALUATION and FACT SHEET. April 15,2010

RESEARCH PROPOSAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF ON-SITE TREATMENT OF FAECAL SLUDGE

CITY OF NEWTON Septage and Grease Trap Waste Disposal Program TABLE OF CONTENTS

Added text in bold italics Initial Proposal Deleted text shown struck through

Wastewater Master Plan. Septage Transport and Disposal to the Detroit Wastewater System

Envirochem Testing Lab & Research Centre, Plot No. 165, Sector-25, Part-II, HUDA, Panipat, Haryana. Discipline Chemical Testing Issue Date

What is essential for the decentralized waste water management? Experience of Japan, Malaysia, India

WELCOME. New Septage Waste Haulage Receiving Station Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (Class EA)

Watermatex To be Presented by: Professor Kin Man Ho Kingsford Environmental Hong Kong

City/County Yard Waste Issue Paper

Washtenaw County DESIGN PROCEDURES AND ENGINEERING STANDARDS FOR PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS

Liquid Waste Haulers Stakeholders Meeting

CONTRACT TERM: APRIL 28, 2018 THROUGH APRIL 27, 2020 RES. NO

TREATMENTOF PETROCHEMICAL WASTEWATERS

Next generation high-performance cationic dewatering flocculants. Kemira Superfloc XD series

Co-Composting of Municipal Solid Waste and Faecal Sludge for Agriculture in Kushtia Municipality, Bangladesh

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STATE INDUSTRIAL PERMIT INSPECTION FORM. Permit No.: 4369-WR-1 Inspection Date: September 7,2006

Authorized feedstocks, bulking agents, and additives and classification of composting facilities.

Grease Inspection Program

Container Management ASTSWMO. Conference & Training

Excessive Waste. Some of the grease is used to supplement feed farms but majority of it ends up in landfills

MONITORING AND RESEARCH DEPARTMENT

Permitting and Tracking Waste Haulers

14.0 SOLIDS HANDLING

Dossier J Document CEMATE/2 - Page 2/9. Submitted by the requester and received at the laboratory on 16 May 2008.

AN UPDATE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION

ACO Marine product catalogue ACO Clara Waste water treatment plant Sizes 3-240

Chinese Taipei s Experience in Alternative Transport Fuels: Successes and R&D Challenges

A systematic approach to scale up FSM services Case of Government of Maharashtra

Planning for An Uncertain Future: Biosolids Disposal in a Bold New World

SYNAGRO CAWPCA October 27, 2011

Albany County Water Purification District. General Permit Rules and Regulations for Sanitary Hauled Waste

Discipline Chemical Testing Issue Date Certificate Number T-3037 Valid Until Last Amended on - Page 1 of 6

Installation, Operation & Maintenance Manual. TotlSep (TS) Series. FRP Oil/Water Separator

FINAL REPORT SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS DEVELOPMENT OF GUIDELINES, STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF SEPTAGE AND SLUDGE

MOBILE AREA WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM FEE SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2018

Development and testing of a fully gravitational submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (FG-SAnMBR) for wastewater treatment

ORDINANCE NO BE ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TALLADEGA, ALABAMA, AS FOLLOWS:

UTILITY RATES AND FEES

MOUNT PLEASANT WATERWORKS GUIDELINES FOR THE FATS, OILS, GREASE AND SOLIDS (FOG) REMOVAL PROGRAM

ROTAMAT Sludge Acceptance Plant Ro 3

(a) Administrator means Clearwater's Public Works Administrator or his or her designee.

Transcription:

Septage Treatment at Small Wastewater Treatment Plants Khamis Al-Omari Omari,, Hazen and Sawyer, P.C. 2008 MWEA Annual Conference (Session 3) Boyne Mountain Resort Boyne Falls, Michigan June 23, 2008

Acknowledgements Stephen May, Lenawee County Drain Commissioner Michael Roys,, Lenawee County Drain Commission W. James Gellner,, Hazen and Sawyer, P.C. Michigan Water Environment Association

Objectives Present Project Background Review Regulatory Requirements Present Innovative Concepts Evaluated for Septage Treatment Summarize Full-scale Pilot Program Protocol for Septage Co-digestion with WAS Present Pilot Program Results Conclusions

Project Background Existing Plants with Limited/No Capacity - 0.4 mgd Central Lenawee WWTP - 1.2 mgd Rollin-Woodstock WWTP 17,000 Septic Tanks in Lenawee County Annually - Approximately 1.75 Million Gallons of Pumped Septage Applied to Land No Septage Treatment Facilities in Lenawee County Existing Law on Septage Hauling and Disposal Amended in October 2004

Septage Design Data (20-year Projection - 2025) 19,900 Septic Tanks Peak Day 33,500 gals Average Day 13,500 gals Maximum Month 18,000 gals/day

Amended Law Requirements Septage Haulers Required to Dispose Septage at A Receiving Facility, when: - Septage is Pumped within 15 miles of Receiving Facility (Beginning 10/12/2005) - Septage is Pumped within 25 miles of Receiving Facility (Beginning 10/12/2010)

Amended Law Requirements (cont d) Domestic Septage is Required to be Screened before Land Application (Beginning 10/12/2006) Provide 50,000 gal. or more of Storage Septage Waste will Not be Allowed to be Applied to Frozen Ground (Beginning 10/12/2006)

Domestic Septage Septage Pumped from: - Home Septic Tanks, - Recreational Vehicles, - Cesspool, - Portable Toilet, - Type III Marine Sanitation Device, or - Similar Storage or Treatment Works that receive only Domestic Sewage

Central Lenawee WWTP 0.4 mgd Sequential Batch Reactor (SBR) Aerobic Digestion of WAS No Capacity for Septage Expansion to 1.7 mgd

Rollin-Woodstock WWTP 1.2 mgd Activated Sludge No Primary Aerobic Digestion of WAS Limited Capacity for Septage Expansion to 2.9 mgd

Optimization and Upgrade Alternatives

Recommendation Accept and Screen Septage at Rollin- Woodstock WWTP Treat Septage through Solids Handling Process Implement a 90-day, Full-Scale Septage Pilot Program to Provide: - Data on Septage Characteristics - Basis for Upgrades Design - Basis for Optimum Operation - Interim Alternative for Accepting Septage and Meet the Regulatory Deadlines

Treatment Concepts Co-digestion of Screened Septage and Thickened Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) Contact Stabilization of Screened Septage Packaged Membrane Bioreactor System (MBR)

Recommended Concept: Co-digestion of Screened Septage and WAS

Pilot Program: Co-digestion of Screened Septage and Thickened WAS

Rollin-Woodstock WWTP Septage Pilot Program Manually Cleaned Screen with 3/8 Spacing Used Two Existing Aerobic Digesters (Total Vol. 103,400 gallons)

Septage and Decant Sampling and Analysis Total Solids (TS) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Volatile Suspended Solids (VSS) 5-Day Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) Soluble BOD5 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) Ammonia Nitrogen (NH3-N) N) Total Phosphorus (Total-P) Orthophosphate (PO4-P) P) Total Alkalinity ph

Raw Septage Volume Raw Septage Characteristics Volume (Gallons) 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 Avg. Volume (gallons), 5,527 0 9/15 10/5 10/25 11/14 12/4 12/24 1/13 2/2 2/22 Day Volume Avg. Volume (gallons)

Raw Septage BOD5 & Sol. BOD5 Raw Septage Characteristics Concentration (mg/l) 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Avg BOD5 (mg/l), 3,916 Avg SOL BOD (mg/l), 234 9/15 10/5 10/25 11/14 12/4 12/24 1/13 2/2 2/22 Day BOD 5 Avg BOD5 (mg/l) SOL BOD Avg SOL BOD (mg/l)

Aerobic Digester BOD5 & Sol. BOD5 Decant Characteristics 40 Concentration (mg/l) 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 Avg. BOD 5 (mg/l), 9.8 Avg.Sol BOD5 (mg/l), 3.9 0 9/15 10/5 10/25 11/14 12/4 12/24 1/13 2/2 2/22 Day BOD 5 Avg. BOD 5 (mg/l) Sol BOD5 Avg.Sol BOD5 (mg/l)

BOD5 Loadings: Septage vs. Decant BOD 5 Loading (PPD) BOD 5 Loading (PPD) 2000 1500 1000 500 BOD5 Capacity (PPD), 1,201 0 9/15 10/5 10/25 11/14 12/4 12/24 1/13 2/2 2/22 Day Influent BOD5 Septage BOD5 Decant BOD5 BOD5 Capacity (PPD)

Raw Septage TSS & VSS Raw Septage Characteristics Concentration (mg/l) 45000 40000 Avg TSS (mg/l), 14,256 35000 30000 25000 Avg VSS (mg/l), 9,489 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 9/20 10/10 10/30 11/19 12/9 12/29 1/18 2/7 Day TSS Avg TSS (mg/l) VSS Avg VSS (mg/l)

Aerobic Digester TSS & VSS Decant Characteristics Concentration (mg/l) 100 80 60 40 20 Avg. VSS (mg/l), 16.1 Avg. TSS (mg/l), 22.9 0 9/15 10/5 10/25 11/14 12/4 12/24 1/13 2/2 2/22 Day TSS Avg. TSS (mg/l) VSS Avg. VSS (mg/l)

TSS Loadings: Septage vs. Decant TSS Loading (PPD) 2000 TSS Loading (PPD) 1500 1000 500 TSS Capacity (PPD), 1,501 0 9/20 10/10 10/30 11/19 12/9 12/29 1/18 2/7 Day Influent TSS Septage TSS Decant TSS TSS Capacity (PPD)

3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Total Solids in Digesters Total Solids in Digesters Concentration of Total Solids in Digesters 10/1 10/8 10/15 10/22 10/29 11/5 11/12 11/19 11/26 12/3 12/10 12/17 12/24 12/31 1/7 1/14 1/21 Day Digester 1 Digester 2 % Total Solids

1/28 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Total Volatile Solids in Digesters Total Volatile Solids in Digesters % Volatile Solids in Digesters 10/8 10/15 10/22 10/29 11/5 11/12 11/19 11/26 12/3 12/10 12/17 12/24 12/31 1/7 1/14 1/21 Day Digester 1 Digester 2 10/1 % Volatile Solids

Cum. VSout, pounds Volatile Solids Reduction (Best-fit Line Analysis) 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 Cumulative VSSin (Septage & WAS) versus Cumulative VSout (Decant VSS & Wasted VS) 74% Reduction in Volatile Solids 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 Cum. VSSin, pounds VSS/VS Data Best Fit Line

Conclusions Aerobic Co-digestion of Screened Septage and Thickened WAS could: - Reduce Burden of Expanding Liquid Stream - Interim Alternative for Accepting Septage - Significant Reduction in Organic Loading on the Liquid Stream - Reduction of Volatile Solids - No Adverse Impact on Quality of Biosolids Produced

Hauled Sludge Vendor Results (Before and After Accepting Septage) 292,000 gal hauled Oct. 323,000 gal hauled Sept. 31, 2006 (before) 20, 2007 (after 12 months) Total Solids 3.0% Total Solids 2.75% Total Volatile Solids 51% Total Volatile Solids 58% TKN-N N 21000 mg/kg-dry TKN-N N 24900 mg/kg-dry Total-P P 31000 mg/kg-dry Total-P P 33970 mg/kg-dry ph 7.6 ph 7.0

Hauled Sludge Plant Results (Before and After Accepting Septage) 292,000 gal hauled Oct. 31, 2006 (before) Total Solids 3.7% Total Volatile Solids 49% ph 7.2 Pathogen Reduction 9995 cfu/gm 323,000 gal hauled Sept. 20, 2007 (after) Total Solids 5.3% Total Volatile Solids 54% ph n/a Pathogen Reduction 8153 cfu/gm

Questions?

Misc. Backup Slides for Q&A Only

Rollin-Woodstock WWTP

How Septic Tanks Work?

Raw Septage NH3 & TKN Raw Septage Characteristics Concentration (mg/l) 2000 1500 Avg TKN (mg/l), 631 1000 500 Avg NH3 (mg/l), 118 0 9/20 10/10 10/30 11/19 12/9 12/29 1/18 2/7 Day TKN Avg TKN (mg/l) NH3 Avg NH3 (mg/l)

Aerobic Digester Decant NH3 & TKN Decant Characteristics 12 Concentration (mg/l) 10 8 6 4 2 Avg. NH3 (mg/l), 0.5 Avg. TKN (mg/l), 4.1 0 9/15 10/5 10/25 11/14 12/4 12/24 1/13 2/2 2/22 Day TKN Avg. TKN (mg/l) NH3 Avg. NH3 (mg/l)

Raw Septage Total-P P & Ortho-P Raw Septage Characteristics Concentration (mg/l) 400 350 300 Avg Total P (mg/l), 109 250 200 Avg Ortho P (mg/l), 9.9 150 100 50 0 9/15 10/5 10/25 11/14 12/4 12/24 1/13 2/2 2/22 Day Total P Avg Total P (mg/l) Ortho P Avg Ortho P (mg/l)

Aerobic Digester Decant Total-P P & Ortho-P 3 Decant Characteristics Concentration (mg/l) 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 Avg. Total P (mg/l), 0.9 Avg. Ortho P (mg/l), 0.4 0 9/15 10/5 10/25 11/14 12/4 12/24 1/13 2/2 2/22 Day Total P Avg. Total P (mg/l) Ortho P Avg. Ortho P (mg/l)

Raw Septage TS Raw Septage Characteristics 6 Percentage (%) 5 4 3 2 1 Average TS (%), 1.68 0 9/20 10/10 10/30 11/19 12/9 12/29 1/18 2/7 Day Total Solids Average TS (%)

Raw Septage Total Alkalinity Raw Septage Characteristics Concentration (mg/l) 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Avg.Total Alk. (mg/l), 1,031 0 9/20 10/10 10/30 11/19 12/9 12/29 1/18 2/7 Day Total Alkalinity Avg.Total Alk. (mg/l)

Raw Septage ph Raw Septage Characteristics ph 8 7.8 7.6 7.4 7.2 7 6.8 Avg ph, 7.1 6.6 9/20 10/10 10/30 11/19 12/9 12/29 1/18 2/7 Day ph Avg ph

Project Schedule Item Due Date Public Hearing Notice 5/27/2006 Public Hearing 6/27/2006 Project Plan Submittal 7/1/2006 MDEQ Project Priority List 10/1/2006 Final Design to MDEQ 3/1/2007 Bid Advertisement 3/31/2007 Construction Startup 5/1/2007 Construction Completion 10/1/2008