CITY OF POWAY MEMORANDUM

Similar documents
TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC COMMITTEE. Speed Limit. Sellas Road North/Sellas Road South; Ladera Ranch; TB 952-F1. Traffic Engineering.

Evaluation of Request to Establish 15 MPH Speed Limits on Streets around Schools

Engineering and Traffic Survey

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

Applicable California Vehicle Code Sections, 2015 Edition

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

CAR 10-1 TRAFFIC CALMING CAR 10-1 OPR: Engineering 06/06

TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

Assistant General Manager

DATE: August 13, 2013 AGENDA ITEM # 8. City Council. Cedric Novenario, Transportation Manager RECOMMENDATION:

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

Pole Mounted Speed Display Pilot Program Study. January, 2016

POLICIES FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SPEED HUMPS (Amended May 23, 2011)

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

CHAPTER 11 SNOWMOBILES AND ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES SNOWMOBILE AND ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE REGULATIONS

STATE OF WASHINGTON. County of Jefferson

CITY CLERK. Warrants for All-Way Stop Sign Control and 40 km/h Maximum Speed Limits

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Purpose of Tonight s Meeting

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

2. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

Speed Limit Study: Traffic Engineering Report

AGENDA REPORT. TO: Office ofthe City Administrator ATTN: Deborah Edgerly FROM: Community and Economic Development Agency DATE: June 24, 2008

SPEED HUMP POLICY. It is the policy of Hamilton Township to consider requests for speed humps as outlined below:

Act 229 Evaluation Report

CITY OF GILROY 2012 SPEED SURVEY

Review, Discuss, and Recommend Approval to City Council for Three New Two-Way Stop Intersections on Country Club Drive

City of Lafayette Staff Report Circulation Commission

POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION. Effective Date: July 10, 2013

TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT 404 EAST WASHINGTON BROWNSVILLE, TEXAS City of Brownsville Speed Hump Installation Policy

Engineering Report: Shasta-Trinity National Forest. South Fork Management Unit. Analysis of. National Forest System Road 30N44

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

traversing them. Speed dips may be installed in lieu of speed humps where the 85 th percentile speed on a street is at least 36 mph.

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

Reduced Speed Limits or Curve Warning Signs? Northeast Traffic Safety Conference Cromwell, Connecticut October 24-25, 2017

SOUTHERN GATEWAY. Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee 11 May 2015

Effective Speed Zoning Why and How

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

Introduction and Background Study Purpose

Memorandum. To: Sue Polka, City Engineer, City of Arden Hills. From: Sean Delmore, PE, PTOE. Date: June 21, 2017

Plainfield, Indiana Speed Limit Study

CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION POLICY... 3 III. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION PROCEDURE... 7 APPENDIX A... 9 APPENDIX B...

SPEED HUMP POLICY and PROCEDURES for RESIDENTIAL AREAS

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site

85th. HB 87 vs 85 Percentile Speed

Clearlake Road (State Road 501) Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study

The remainder of this memorandum contains the details of our peer review findings.

RTE. 1 at RTE. 637 & RTE. 639

Traffic Regulations Guidelines

o or Violating What They Capture?

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

a. A written request for speed humps must be submitted by residents living along the applicable street(s) to the Public Works Department.

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis

South Lexington Transportation Study Lexington, Massachusetts

Establishing Realistic Speed Limits

TRAFFIC REGULATION APPROVAL PROCESS

4 SPEED LIMIT REVISIONS ON REGIONAL ROADS

INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION

Figure 1 Map of intersection of SR 44 (Ravenna Rd) and Butternut Rd

CHAPTER 14 TRAFFIC CODE THE MINNESOTA HIGHWAY TRAFFIC REGULATION ACT.

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

Characterization of Combined Use of County Road Segment

SPEED CUSHION POLICY AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES FOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS

Traffic, Transportation & Civil Engineering Ali R. Khorasani, P.E. P.O. Box 804, Spencer, MA 01562, Tel: (508)

Engineering Report: Shasta-Trinity National Forest. Shasta McCloud Management Unit. Analysis of. National Forest System Road 37N79

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

Additional $200 Speeding Fine Signs

Purpose and Need Report

Safety Assessment. Intersection of Route 29 (Seminole Trail) and Ashwood Blvd (Route 1670). Albemarle County

POLICY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND POSTING OF SPEED LIMITS ON COUNTY AND TOWNSHIP HIGHWAYS WITHIN MCHENRY COUNTY, ILLINOIS

Commissioning Director for Environment. Officer Contact Details Lisa Wright; Summary

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONOENCE

MADERAS HOTEL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS. LLG Ref Transportation Planner III & Jorge Cuyuch Transportation Engineer I

Background. Request for Decision. Pedestrian Lighting Standards for Road Right-of-ways. Recommendation. Presented: Monday, Mar 17, 2014

Designation of a Community Safety Zone in Honey Harbour in the Township of Georgian Bay

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Part A: Introduction

Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. General Manager, Transportation Services and Treasurer. P:\2015\Internal Services\rev\pw15018rev (AFS20761)

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For:

Emergency Signal Warrant Evaluation: A Case Study in Anchorage, Alaska

Access Management Standards

Slow Down! Why speed is important in realizing your Vision Zero goals and how to achieve the speeds you need

AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

D R A F T TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. DARK HORSE GOLF RESORT EXPANSION Nevada County, CA. Prepared For:

Speed Evaluation Saw Mill Drive

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT BRAD FOWLER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT SUBCOMMITTEE

Horizontal Sight Distance Considerations Freeway and Interchange Reconstruction

TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Sacramento, CA. Prepared For: MBK Homes. Prepared By:

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE. Honorable Bill Rosendahl, Chair Transportation Committee

Right-of-Way Obstruction Permit Fee Structure Minneapolis Department of Public Works May 10, 2001

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

5.9 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

Low Speed Design Criteria for Residential Streets Andrew J. Ballard, P.E. and David M. Haldeman, E.I.T.

Speed measurements were taken at the following three locations on October 13 and 14, 2016 (See Location Map in Exhibit 1):

Corridor Sketch Summary

Village of West Dundee IL 31 & IL 72 Red Light Running (RLR) Statistical Analysis Report May 14, 2018

2. Valley Circle Boulevard/Andora Avenue/Baden Avenue and Lassen Street

Rolling Road (Route 638) Widening Project

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

Transcription:

CITY OF POWAY MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Traffic Safety Committee Steve Crosby P.E., City Engineer DATE: February 14, 2018 SUBJECT: Espola Road speeding concerns BACKGROUND In 2017, staff received a request from residents to consider the installation of permanent driver speed feedback signs on Espola Road between Sand Hill Road and Trailwind Road. The Sheriff s department has placed their mobile speed feedback trailer on this stretch of Espola Road at various times in response to resident concerns over drivers exceeding the speed limit. In order to evaluate the request for permanent speed feedback signs, traffic engineering staff conducted a field investigation of the subject area, researched collision histories, performed a radar speed survey on Espola Road, and reviewed how the current speed limit on Espola Road was established. FINDINGS Espola Road between Cloudcroft Drive and Titan Way is a four-lane arterial with a striped median. The Average Daily Traffic is 11,771 vehicles based on the 2013 Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS). The travel lanes vary in size but are at a minimum of twelve feet. There is a large horizontal curve that starts at Old Coach Road and terminates north of Country Day Road. Bike lanes are provided on both sides of the roadway. A sidewalk is provided on the North/East side and a dirt equestrian/pedestrian trail is provided on the South/West side of the street. There are a few residential driveways that take access from the south side of the street in the vicinity of Orchard Bend Road. Otherwise there is limited access along this stretch of roadway. The current posted speed limit on this stretch of road is 45 MPH. A review of the Transportation Injury Mapping System accident database found a total of ten accidents on this stretch of road from 2011 to 2016. One accident was determined to be related to unsafe speed. The other accidents were related to turns at the intersections, run off the road collisions with fixed objects or DUIs. The accident rate for this segment of roadway was 0.25 accidents per million vehicle miles compared to the Statewide average of 2.15 based on the findings from the 2013 E&TS.

Radar speed survey data was collected on November 28, 2017 on Espola Road north of Sandhill Road. The speed survey results are shown in Attachment A. It should be noted that the data has not been certified and therefore is not a valid speed survey for enforcement of the speed limit on this road. The data was only collected for informational purposes of this report. The posted speed limit on this segment of Espola Road is 45 MPH. The measured 50 th percentile Speed was 48 MPH and the 85 th percentile speed was 52 MPH in the southbound direction, and the measured 50 th percentile Speed was 48 MPH and the 85 th percentile speed was 53 MPH in the northbound direction. It should be noted that of the 224 vehicle speeds that were measured, 166 were measured travelling over the posted speed limit. Sections 22357 and 22358 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) gives local municipalities the authority to set speed limits below the maximum speed limits set forth by State law, where such speed limits are supported by an E&TS. The E&TS enables our Sheriff s Deputies to use radar for traffic speed enforcement and serve as legal authority in accordance with the CVC. The City s current E&TS (Attachment B) adopted in 2013 was prepared pursuant to the guidelines of a previous edition of the California MUTCD. The MUTCD calls for speed limits to be established to the nearest 5 MPH increment of the 85 th percentile speed. For example, if the 85 th percentile speed is 47 MPH, the speed limit should be posted at 45 MPH. However, if the 85 th percentile speed is 48 MPH, the speed limit should be posted at 50 MPH. Section 22358.5 of the CVC gives local agencies the authority to lower the speed limit an additional 5 MPH below the adjusted 85 th percentile when there are conditions that are not apparent to drivers, which manifest in higher accident rates on the roadway. These include driveways directly abutting the roadway with frequent turns, insufficient sight distances, mid-block pedestrian and/or equestrian crossings, and pedestrians and bikers along the roadway. Roadway physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions are not considered conditions not apparent to drivers by State law. Previously, the 5 MPH reduction rule under Section 22358.5 could be used if the speed limit was set to the nearest 5 MPH increment of the 85 th percentile speed. Now however, if the closest 5 MPH increment is also the lowest 5 MPH increment, the additional 5 MPH reduction cannot be used. For example, an 85 th percentile speed of 52 MPH would be rounded to 50 MPH and the additional 5 MPH reduction would not be allowed because 50 MPH is the nearest as well as the lowest 5 MPH increment. An 85 th percentile speed of 53 MPH would be rounded to 55 MPH, and with the 5 MPH reduction the speed limit could be reduced to 50 MPH if warranted by roadway conditions. Data from the 2013 E&TS shows an 85 th percentile speed of 48 MPH for Espola Road. Based on the California MUTCD and the latest Caltrans Traffic Operation Policy Directive #09-04, Change in current California MUTCD policy and procedure for setting speed limits in California, the speed limit on Espola Road would be set at 50 MPH, which is the nearest 5 MPH increment speed to the 85 th percentile speed of 48

MPH. However, staff at that time determined that the pedestrian/equestrian uses along the roadway justified use of the 5 MPH reduction rule in the posted speed, and staff recommended a 45 MPH speed limit for Espola Road along this segment. Based on the results of the recent uncertified speed survey data which indicated 85 th percentile speeds of 52 and 53 MPH, the posted speed limit would be set at 50 MPH. Staff would not be allowed to reduce the posted speed to 45 MPH based on the current criteria for use of the 5 MPH reduction rule. DISCUSSION Staff believes that there are four options for addressing vehicle speed on Espola Road. Increased Enforcement- The Sherriff s Department does cite vehicles along this stretch of Espola Road. The citations are valid based on the certified speed limit of 45 MPH that was completed with the 2013 E&TS. Increased enforcement combined with periodic deployment of the Sheriff s mobile speed feedback trailer is a viable option. Installation of permanent speed feedback signs- Permanent speed feedback signs have been installed in other areas of the City. Based on those installations, the anticipated cost would be $10,000 to $15,000 per installation for a pole mounted vehicle speed feedback sign in the shoulder of the road. However, Espola Road in this section is a wide four-lane facility with a striped median and a roadside shoulder installation may not be as effective as a mast arm installation extending over the travel lanes. Mast arm installation would significantly increase the cost per location. Staff has not determined the exact locations or type of speed feedback signs to provide the most benefit at reducing speeds on this segment of Espola Road. Increasing the Posted Speed- The 2013 ET&S findings reported an 85 th percentile speed of 48 MPH which would warrant a posted speed of 50 MPH. This was reduced to 45 MPH based on the 5 MPH increment reduction rule allowance. Changing the posted speed based on the recent speed survey conducted, which resulted in 85 th percentile speeds of 52 and 53 MPH, would result in a recommended posted speed of 50 MPH. Staff would not be allowed to reduce the posted speed to 45 MPH based on the current criteria for use of the 5 MPH reduction rule. The posted speed would have to be 50 MPH. This change would require following certain procedures including adoption by City Council in order for the new speed limit to be enforceable. Traffic Calming Through Striping Changes- Staff has restriped other roadway segments within the City in recent years to aid in the following: reducing driver speed due to driver perception of narrower lanes provide wider bike lanes provide bike lane buffers Bike lane buffers have been added to Scripps Poway Parkway, Pomerado Road, and most recently Poway road. The additional width required for the bike lane buffers was taken from the through travel lanes resulting in a narrowing of those lanes. The minimum lane widths have been held to eleven feet. For reference, Caltrans standard freeway lane width is twelve feet. The existing lanes on Espola Road currently vary to

more than thirteen feet in width. This section of Espola Road is scheduled to receive slurry seal in summer of 2018. This provides the opportunity to restripe the roadway starting with a clean slate. The road could be restriped with bike buffers and eleven foot maximum through lanes as shown in Attachment C. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Sheriff s Department increase enforcement in the area as resources are available. Staff also recommends restriping the road to install the bike lane buffers and narrow the travel lanes to eleven feet. After the restriping is implemented staff recommends conducting another radar speed survey to determine if the restriping was effective at lowering speed to be more in line with the current posted speed of 45 MPH. If speed survey result indicate that the restriping was ineffective at reducing speeds the permanent vehicle speed feedback sign option can be considered at that time. Attachments: A. Radar speed survey results B. 2013 ET&S Espola Road speed survey section C. Proposed Espola Road Restriping

Attachment C Espola Road Existing Condition 5' Bike Lane 13' 12' 15' Center Turn Lane 12' 13' 5' Bike Lane 75 Proposed Condition 6' Bike Lane 3' Buffer 11' 11' 13' Center Turn Lane 11' 11' 3' Buffer 6' Bike Lane 75 Espola Road between Cloudcroft Drive and Lake Poway Road Cross-Sections