Bridging Team Efforts Supporting Current & Future Forces. UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

Similar documents
TARDEC Robotics. Dr. Greg Hudas UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Track & Suspension Overview Mr. Jason Alef & Mr. Geoff Bossio 11 Aug 2011

TARDEC Technology Integration

TARDEC OVERVIEW. Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center. APTAC Spring Conference Detroit 27 March, 2007

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Power Requirements

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

TARDEC Hybrid Electric Program Last Decade

GM-TARDEC Autonomous Safety Collaboration Meeting

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Command (TARDEC) Overview

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Non-primary Power Systems Overview Kevin Centeck and Darin Kowalski 10 Aug 2011

Energy Storage Requirements & Challenges For Ground Vehicles

UNCLASSIFIED: DIST A. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. ARMY GREATEST INVENTIONS CY 2009 PROGRAM MRAP Overhead Wire Mitigation (OWM) Kit

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

Alternative Fuels: FT SPK and HRJ for Military Use

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Energy Storage Overview Mr. David Skalny & Dr. Laurence Toomey 10 August 2011

UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution A. Approved for Public Release TACOM Case # 21906, 26 May Vehicle Electronics and Architecture

Robot Drive Motor Characterization Test Plan

Energy Storage Commonality Military vs. Commercial Trucks

EXPLORATORY DISCUSSIONS - PRE DECISIONAL

Center for Ground Vehicle Development and Integration

INTELLIGENT ENERGY MANAGEMENT IN A TWO POWER-BUS VEHICLE SYSTEM. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

AFRL-RX-TY-TM

FINAL REPORT FOR THE C-130 RAMP TEST #3 OF A HYDREMA MINE CLEARING VEHICLE

Up-Coming Diesel Fuel and Exhaust Emissions Regulations For Mobile Sources. Parminder Khabra RDECOM-TARDEC TACOM LCMC March 22, 2006 JSEM

Open & Evolutive UAV Architecture

TARDEC --- TECHNICAL REPORT ---

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 3

An Advanced Fuel Filter

Feeding the Fleet. GreenGov Washington D.C. October 31, 2011

Evaluation of Single Common Powertrain Lubricant (SCPL) Candidates for Fuel Consumption Benefits in Military Equipment

Servicing Hawker Vehicle Batteries with Standard Battery Charging and Test Equipment

FTTS Utility Vehicle UV2 Concept Review FTTS UV2 Support Variant

Automatic Air Collision Avoidance System. Auto-ACAS. Mark A. Skoog Dryden Flight Research Center - NASA. AutoACAS. Dryden Flight Research Center

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 4

REMOTE MINE AREA CLEARANCE EQUIPMENT (MACE) C-130 LOAD CELL TEST DATA

Dual Use Ground Vehicle Condition-Based Maintenance Project B

U.S. Army/CERDEC's Portable Fuel Cell Evaluation and Field Testing 2011 Fuel Cell Seminar & Expo Orlando, FL 31 Oct 2011

DSCC Annual Tire Conference CATL UPDATE. March 24, 2011 UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

2011 NDIA GROUND VEHICLE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM POWER AND MOBILITY (P&M) MINI-SYMPOSIUM AUGUST 9-11 DEARBORN, MICHIGAN

Predator B: The Multi-Role UAV

Program Overview. Chris Mocnik Robotic Vehicle Control Architecture for FCS ATO Manager U.S. Army RDECOM TARDEC

US ARMY POWER OVERVIEW

Multilevel Vehicle Design: Fuel Economy, Mobility and Safety Considerations, Part B

Fuel Efficient ground vehicle Demonstrator (FED) Vision

LESSONS LEARNED WHILE MEASURING FUEL SYSTEM DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE MARK HEATON AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA 10 MAY 2011

Tank-Automotive Research, Development, and Engineering Center

BALANCE OF PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS FOR SURVIVABILITY AND MOBILITY IN THE DEMONSTRATOR FOR NOVEL DESIGN (DFND) VEHICLE CONCEPTS

EVALUATING VOLTAGE REGULATION COMPLIANCE OF MIL-PRF-GCS600A(ARMY) FOR VEHICLE ON-BOARD GENERATORS AND ASSESSING OVERALL VEHICLE BUS COMPLIANCE

High efficiency variable speed versatile power air conditioning system for military vehicles

Monolithically Integrated Micro Flapping Vehicles

Presented by Mr. Greg Kilchenstein OSD, Maintenance. 29August 2012

Helicopter Dynamic Components Project. Presented at: HCAT Meeting January 2006

Evaluation of SpectroVisc Q3000 for Viscosity Determination

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

Application of Airbag Technology for Vehicle Protection

ITC-Germany Visit. Chuck Coutteau, Associate Director Ground Vehicle Power and Mobility Overview 10 November 2011

SIO Shipyard Representative Bi-Weekly Progress Report

US Army Non - Human Factor Helicopter Mishap Findings and Recommendations. Major Robert Kent, USAF, MC, SFS

Robust Fault Diagnosis in Electric Drives Using Machine Learning

Hydro-Piezoelectricity: A Renewable Energy Source For Autonomous Underwater Vehicles

Cadmium Repair Alternatives on High-Strength Steel January 25, 2006 Hilton San Diego Resort 1775 East Mission Bay Drive San Diego, CA 92109

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Crew integration & Automation Testbed and Robotic Follower Programs

HIGH REPETITION RATE CHARGING A MARX TYPE GENERATOR *

Joint Assault Bridge (JAB)

2012 ENFORCE COL Eric Fletcher Project Manager, Force Projection

Hybrid Components: Motors and Power Electronics

Predator Program Office

F100 ENGINE NACELLE FIRE FIGHTING TEST MOCKUP DRAWINGS

IMPACT OF FRICTION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGIES ON FUEL ECONOMY FOR GROUND VEHICLES G. R. Fenske, R. A. Erck, O. O. Ajayi, A. Masoner, and A. S.

Development of Man Portable Auxiliary Power Unit using Advanced Large Format Lithium-Ion Cells

Does V50 Depend on Armor Mass?

Navy Coalescence Test on Petroleum F-76 Fuel with Infineum R655 Lubricity Improver at 300 ppm

GVSET Power & Energy Preview Mr. Chuck Coutteau Associate Director (Acting) Ground Vehicle Power & Mobility 19 August 2009

Navy Coalescence Test on Camelina HRJ5 Fuel

Report No. D November 24, Live Fire Testing of Light Tactical Wheeled Vehicles was Effective for the Portions Completed

DESULFURIZATION OF LOGISTIC FUELS FOR FUEL CELL APUs

Evaluation of Digital Refractometers for Field Determination of FSII Concentration in JP-5 Fuel

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Family of Heavy Tactical Vehicles

A GENERAL PURPOSE VEHICLE POWERTRAIN MODELING AND SIMULATION SOFTWARE - VPSET

Power Technology Branch Army Power Division US Army RDECOM CERDEC C2D Fort Belvoir, Virginia

Research Development and Engineering Command TARDEC/NAC

DEVELOPMENT OF COMPACT VARIABLE- VOLTAGE, BI-DIRECTIONAL 100KW DC-DC CONVERTER

Portable Fluid Analyzer

TRANSIENT MAGNETIC FLUX DENSITY MEASUREMENT RESULTS ON A FUSELAGE-LIKE TEST SETUP AND INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF APERTURES

NDCEE National Defense Center for Energy and Environment

INLINE MONITORING OF FREE WATER AND PARTICULATE CONTAMINATION OF JET A FUEL

Additives to Increase Fuel Heat Sink Capacity

Quarterly Progress Report

2012 E2S2 CARB s New Mobile Equipment Regulations

Membrane Wing Aerodynamics for µav Applications

Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

FCS Technology Insertion and Transition

Presented by: Dr. Richard Gerth U.S. Army National Automotive Center (NAC) Tank Automotive Research Development and Engineering Center

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards VHG Labs Inc. Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100 and D12-XXX Series Standards

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Power Distribution System for a Small Unmanned Rotorcraft

Linear Algebraic Modeling of Power Flow in the HMPT500-3 Transmission

Materials for Ground Platform Survivability

Transcription:

Bridging Team Efforts Supporting Current & Future Forces UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 29 FEB 2010 2. REPORT TYPE N/A 3. DATES COVERED - 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Bridging Team Efforts Supporting Current & Future Forces 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) Suzanne Culkin 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) US Army RDECOM-TARDEC 6501 E 11 Mile Rd Warren, MI 48397-5000, USA 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 20580RC 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) TACOM/TARDEC 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release, distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The original document contains color images. 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 20580RC 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT SAR a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 30 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Overview & Mission Statement The purpose of this presentation is to provide an overview of TARDEC Bridging Team s efforts in supporting the sustainment of fielded systems, current development, acquisition and production of gap defeat systems and technology efforts for the Future Force. Mission Statement To provide sound engineering support and technological advancements in military bridging systems to our customers and to be recognized as acquisition specialists and the technology leaders for future bridging systems.

TARDEC Bridging Team Roles & Responsibilities UNCLASSIFIED IPT/Matrix Support to PM Bridging, PM HBCT, and PSID Market Research, Market Investigations Performance Specifications, Purchase Descriptions Requirements and Acquisition Documentation Inspection Of Fielded Bridges Test Reports/Planning/Monitoring Procurement Work Directives (PWD) & 339 s Areas of Technical Expertise Simulation & Structural Strength Testing Finite Element Modeling & Analysis Fatigue Analysis Military Load Classification (MLC) Support for Emerging Technology Army representative for STANAG 2010 & 2021 (MLC Rating and Marking) US Army representative for Trilateral Design & Test Code

TriLateral Design and Test Code Agreed to by United States, United Kingdom and Germany First published in 1974 Bridging and gap-crossing equipment will be designed to meet the user s requirement by applying the necessary loading conditions, design parameters, and testing given in this Code The Code covers loading, design, and testing requirements to be used for the development of military clear-span bridges, piers, floating bridges, rafts, equipment causeways, and erecting and launching structures that are part of the equipment

Bridge Test Lab Capability Capacity Max Bridge Size Perimeter clearance 15 Overhead Clearance 28 Exterior Access Hydraulic Service Electric Service 1 Million Pounds, 10 actuators 210 Length, 32 width, 23 height Door size ( 23 height, 32 width) 2500 psi Pressure, 100 gpm Flow 200hp, 480V Pneumatic Service Classified? 100 psi Pressure, ½ hp capacity No Load frame occupies 150 x 65 hangar bay with 23 tall x 32 wide door opening to an additional 60 x60 reinforced concrete pad Capable to test bridges up to 32 wide and 210 long

Previous Tests Completed M104 Wolverine (Heavy Assault Bridge) Composite Army Bridge (CAB)

Current Testing Armored Vehicle Launched Bridge (AVLB) Vanadium Bridge (experimental customer test)

Systems Overview UNCLASSIFIED

Multi-Role Bridging Company Standard Ribbon Bridge bays in Raft configuration Bridge Erection Boats provide raft propulsion Standard Ribbon Bridge bays in Bridge configuration Bridge Erection Boats provide temporary anchorage The Multi-Role Bridge Company Equipment: Common Bridge Transporter, Improved Boat Cradle & Bridge Adapter, Pallet, M1077 Pallet, Palletized Load System Trailer, Dry Support Bridge, Improved Ribbon Bridge/Standard Ribbon Bridge, Bridge Erection Boat Objective is 23 full companies and one training company

Common Bridge Transport System UNCLASSIFIED Description: The CBTS is a grouping of 5 components: HEMTT Common Bridge Transporter (CBT): designed to lift and transport all bridging flat racks M1077 Flat rack: designed to carry bridge sections Improved Boat Cradle (IBC): designed to carry the BEB Bridge Adapter Pallet (BAP): designed to carry IRB sections Palletized Load System Trailers (PLST): to increase haul capacity Current Status: Production & Deployment

Dry Support Bridge Description: Modular Bridge System for constructing 0-40m Main Supply Routes Specs: MLC 80T/96W, 40m, 4 trucks w/trailers, crew of 8 Manufacturer: United Kingdom contractor Current Status: Production & Deployment R&D 46m capabilities

Medium Girder Bridge Description: Legacy, hand-built, deck type, two-girder, Multi-span bridging system Specs: 2 span double story up to 51.5 m with a MLC of 70 ton 3 span double story up to 76 m with a MLC of 70 Manufacturer: United Kingdom contractor Current Status: Operations & Support for approximately 40 ~ 50 fielded globally Repalletization on M1 and M3 flatracks

Standard and Improved Ribbon Bridge UNCLASSIFIED Description: Float bridge providing assault and tactical bridge and ferry capabilities for infinite span wet gaps Specs: MLC 80T/96W;10 fps currents; Two-lane traffic; CBT transport Manufacturer: German contractor Current Status: Production & Deployment Development of Improved Anchorage System

Bridge Erection Boat Description: Workboat used to build and anchor float bridges and maneuver rafts Specs: Mk I/II (standard), Mk 2R (re-powered) 27 ft, twin-engine, twin-jet, 10000 lbs, 2 crew Current Status: Operations & Support of 350+ in service New Program of Record, Projected award 2QFY10 CRADA USMC Mk III BEB

Line Of Communication Bridge Description: Semi-permanent modular bridge system used to restore or maintain lines of communication routes for both civilian and military traffic Specs: Multi-span bridge design constructed at any length on fixed or floating supports MLC 100W/80T, crew 29 soldiers &1 crane, 8 hours, 50 m of bridge Current Status: Program Of Record LOCB: Capability Production Document approval anticipated 4QFY08 Competitively procure LOC bridges beyond the ONS requirements through full and open competition; Projected award 2QFY10

Bailey Bridge Description: World War II legacy bridge of through-type truss design supported by two main girders formed from 10-ft steel truss sections Specs: MLC varies with configuration: 80 ft span triple/ single is MLC 80 130 ft span triple/ single is MLC 20 Current Status: Over 180 bridge sets are distributed throughout the US Army around the world; No additional procurement is scheduled

Systems Overview UNCLASSIFIED

Rapidly Emplaced Bridging System UNCLASSIFIED Description: C130 transportable bridge for SBCT Specs: MLC 40, 13m, crew of 2 Manufacturer: German contractor Current Status: Production and Deployment Development of Under-ride bar, Arctic Kit

Armored Vehicle Launched Bridge UNCLASSIFIED Description: Legacy folding, scissors-type assault bridge designed to assist militaries in rapidly deploying tanks and other armored fighting vehicles Specs: MLC 60/70 ton, 60 foot span bridge on M60A1, M48A5 Chassis Manufacturer: U.S. contractor Current Status: Operations & Support of over 700 AVLB systems RESET/RECAP Hydraulic and Electric Upgrade at ANAD

M104 Wolverine Description: Armored vehicle designed to carry, emplace, and retrieve a Heavy Assault Bridge capable of supporting heavy loads such as the M1A2 main battle tank Specs: MLC 70 ton, 24 m gap Manufacturer: German contractor - Bridge U.S. contractor - Launcher Current Status: Operations & Support of 44 systems Resolution of long-standing field problems

Joint Assault Bridge Description: Future assault bridging platform, designed to keep pace with the armored force; Consists of an M1A1 chassis, bridge launcher, and AVLB 70 bridge Specs: MLC 70, Span: 18.3 m Manufacturer: JAB designed in-house by Marine Corps Systems Command (MCSC) Anniston Army Depot (ANAD) is production site Current Status: Program lead transferred to Army; acquisition strategy being revised

Assault Breacher Vehicle Description: Full tracked combat engineer vehicle for the MAGTF & Army HBCT to breach minefields & complex obstacles and provide in-stride breaching capability to maneuver forces Specs: M1A1 Abrams tank hull 2 Mk 155 Linear Demolition Charge systems Interchangeable Full Width Mine Plow & Combat Dozer Blade 2 lane marking systems Manufacturer: JAB designed in-house by Marine Corps Systems Command (MCSC) Anniston Army Depot (ANAD) is production site Current Status: USMC Lead with the Army as a participating DoD component as established in a signed Memorandum of Agreement. Production and Deployment

Light Assault Gap Crossing Type I Type 2 Family of Bridges Type I: Type 3 Support crossing of 5 Soldiers within the 95% with full mission equipment Must be able to cross gaps in scalable increments to a total length of 30m Shall be capable of launching within 30 minutes with a crew of 2-8 Soldiers Type 2: 8 m minimum length Bridge adapter kit that can be mounted an launched from a HMMWV, BFV, or M113 40 MLC / 50 MLC caution / 70 MLC / 85 MLC caution (O) The operators of the host vehicle (not to exceed a crew of 2 Soldiers), shall launch/retrieve the bridge in 10 minutes or less during daylight hours Type 3: Span an 18m wet gap or function as a self propelled raft (T) Have the ability to connect systems together to span larger wet gaps or create a larger self propelled raft (T). 40 MLC / 50 MLC caution (T) / 85 MLC / 110 MLC caution (O) The operators of the host vehicle (not to exceed a crew of 2 Soldiers), shall launch/retrieve the bridge in 10 minutes or less during daylight hours

Multi Functional Gap Defeat Assault Tactical Assemble into MLC-100 T&W Concepts: 26-meter Assault 48-meter Tactical 26-meter 48-meter Develop a prospective, single solution for Assault, Tactical and Line-of-Communication gap defeat that communicates in realtime its usage and safe load carrying classification

Composite Joint Assault Bridge Joint Program: Army, Marine Corps, and Navy Development of 6.3 funded technology demonstration full scale composite JAB Leverage technology and lessons learned from Advanced Modular Composite Bridge Requirements: MLC-100 Load Class at 18m (threshold), MLC-100 at full span (objective) span 24 Meters interface with JAB vehicle deploy/retrieve within 3 minutes (objective) allow for traffic of tracked and wheeled military vehicles

Research & Development Efforts UNCLASSIFIED Title: Rapidly deployable gap defeat technology (GDT) for the Future Combat System (FCS) / Future Force (FF) Description: Provide a 1.5 to 4m wet/dry gap bridging technology that is MLC 30/70 (threshold/objective) capable, C-130 aircraft transportable, weigh less than 3000 lbs., can be remotely operated or autonomous, and can be integrated with future FCS vehicle platforms. Funding Type: Broad Agency Announcement (cost sharing contract: 60% govt, 40% contractor), Phase I Title: Innovative Wet Gap Crossing Technologies for the Future Combat System/Future Force Description: Develop an infinite wet gap spanning bridge technology that is C-130 transportable, MLC 30/65 (threshold/objective) capable, and able to be integrated with the Future Combat System vehicles. Funding Type: SBIR (cost + fixed fee contract), Phase II

Research & Development Efforts UNCLASSIFIED Title: Assured Operational Mobility Across Gaps for the (FCS/FF) Description: A flip cantilever bridge and launch technology to remotely deploy a bridge and keep the soldier out of harms way Funding Type: SBIR Phase II Title: Gap Defeat Technology for the FCS Description: Sense the gap, Remotely Inflatable Fascines to be dropped in the 1.5 4 meter gaps; C-130 transportable, CH47 deployable Funding Type: 6.2 Title: Advanced Modular Composite Bridge Description: 10 26 meter long/mlc65 bridge capable of C-130 aircraft transportation Funding Type: 6.3 Congressional plus up

Research & Development Efforts UNCLASSIFIED Title: Repair and Health Monitoring of Composite Military Bridges Description: Diagnostic/Prognostic Structural Health Monitoring of Composite Bridges and their repair, Field/Depot Repair Methodologies Satellite Funding Type: SBIR Depots/TACOM Warning & Verification Go/No Go System for On-coming Vehicles SRK Repair Patch Bridge Launcher Control Panel