Evaluation of Saft Ultra High Power Lithium Ion Cells (VL5U)

Similar documents
Endurance Testing of Redesigned Tab Spring for MI-RAMS System

Metal Detector Battery Longevity Study

Performance of Sony s Alloy Based Li-ion Battery

Power Distribution System for a Small Unmanned Rotorcraft

Robot Drive Motor Characterization Test Plan

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Energy Storage Overview Mr. David Skalny & Dr. Laurence Toomey 10 August 2011

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Blast Pendulum Testing of Milliken Tegris Panels

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

EVALUATING VOLTAGE REGULATION COMPLIANCE OF MIL-PRF-GCS600A(ARMY) FOR VEHICLE ON-BOARD GENERATORS AND ASSESSING OVERALL VEHICLE BUS COMPLIANCE

2011 NDIA GROUND VEHICLE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM POWER AND MOBILITY (P&M) MINI-SYMPOSIUM AUGUST 9-11 DEARBORN, MICHIGAN

TARDEC --- TECHNICAL REPORT ---

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Non-primary Power Systems Overview Kevin Centeck and Darin Kowalski 10 Aug 2011

Energy Storage Requirements & Challenges For Ground Vehicles

Energy Storage Commonality Military vs. Commercial Trucks

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Track & Suspension Overview Mr. Jason Alef & Mr. Geoff Bossio 11 Aug 2011

TARDEC Technology Integration

REMOTE MINE AREA CLEARANCE EQUIPMENT (MACE) C-130 LOAD CELL TEST DATA

FINAL REPORT FOR THE C-130 RAMP TEST #3 OF A HYDREMA MINE CLEARING VEHICLE

Evaluation of SpectroVisc Q3000 for Viscosity Determination

Evaluation of Single Common Powertrain Lubricant (SCPL) Candidates for Fuel Consumption Benefits in Military Equipment

Alternative Fuels: FT SPK and HRJ for Military Use

TARDEC Hybrid Electric Program Last Decade

TARDEC Robotics. Dr. Greg Hudas UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

AFRL-RX-TY-TM

INTELLIGENT ENERGY MANAGEMENT IN A TWO POWER-BUS VEHICLE SYSTEM. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Command (TARDEC) Overview

Navy Coalescence Test on Petroleum F-76 Fuel with Infineum R655 Lubricity Improver at 300 ppm

High efficiency variable speed versatile power air conditioning system for military vehicles

HIGH REPETITION RATE CHARGING A MARX TYPE GENERATOR *

Emission Measurements of Ultracell XX25 Reformed Methanol Fuel Cell System

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution A. Approved for Public Release TACOM Case # 21906, 26 May Vehicle Electronics and Architecture

U.S. Army/CERDEC's Portable Fuel Cell Evaluation and Field Testing 2011 Fuel Cell Seminar & Expo Orlando, FL 31 Oct 2011

Foil Bearing Starting Considerations and Requirements for Rotorcraft Engine Applications

Navy Coalescence Test on Camelina HRJ5 Fuel

EXPLORATORY DISCUSSIONS - PRE DECISIONAL

TARDEC OVERVIEW. Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center. APTAC Spring Conference Detroit 27 March, 2007

US ARMY POWER OVERVIEW

GM-TARDEC Autonomous Safety Collaboration Meeting

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 3

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

Feeding the Fleet. GreenGov Washington D.C. October 31, 2011

Servicing Hawker Vehicle Batteries with Standard Battery Charging and Test Equipment

UNCLASSIFIED: DIST A. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. ARMY GREATEST INVENTIONS CY 2009 PROGRAM MRAP Overhead Wire Mitigation (OWM) Kit

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 4

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

Development of Man Portable Auxiliary Power Unit using Advanced Large Format Lithium-Ion Cells

Power Technology Branch Army Power Division US Army RDECOM CERDEC C2D Fort Belvoir, Virginia

An Advanced Fuel Filter

INLINE MONITORING OF FREE WATER AND PARTICULATE CONTAMINATION OF JET A FUEL

DSCC Annual Tire Conference CATL UPDATE. March 24, 2011 UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

Dual Use Ground Vehicle Condition-Based Maintenance Project B

Robust Fault Diagnosis in Electric Drives Using Machine Learning

Evaluation of Digital Refractometers for Field Determination of FSII Concentration in JP-5 Fuel

Monolithically Integrated Micro Flapping Vehicles

US Army Non - Human Factor Helicopter Mishap Findings and Recommendations. Major Robert Kent, USAF, MC, SFS

FTTS Utility Vehicle UV2 Concept Review FTTS UV2 Support Variant

Replacement Packing for 37MM Antitank Gun Recoil

Does V50 Depend on Armor Mass?

Cadmium Repair Alternatives on High-Strength Steel January 25, 2006 Hilton San Diego Resort 1775 East Mission Bay Drive San Diego, CA 92109

LESSONS LEARNED WHILE MEASURING FUEL SYSTEM DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE MARK HEATON AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA 10 MAY 2011

Automatic Air Collision Avoidance System. Auto-ACAS. Mark A. Skoog Dryden Flight Research Center - NASA. AutoACAS. Dryden Flight Research Center

BALANCE OF PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS FOR SURVIVABILITY AND MOBILITY IN THE DEMONSTRATOR FOR NOVEL DESIGN (DFND) VEHICLE CONCEPTS

Application of Airbag Technology for Vehicle Protection

Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

TRANSIENT MAGNETIC FLUX DENSITY MEASUREMENT RESULTS ON A FUSELAGE-LIKE TEST SETUP AND INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF APERTURES

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Power Requirements

F100 ENGINE NACELLE FIRE FIGHTING TEST MOCKUP DRAWINGS

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards VHG Labs Inc. Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100 and D12-XXX Series Standards

Battery Research & Development Need for Military Vehicle Application

DESULFURIZATION OF LOGISTIC FUELS FOR FUEL CELL APUs

Multilevel Vehicle Design: Fuel Economy, Mobility and Safety Considerations, Part B

Presented by Mr. Greg Kilchenstein OSD, Maintenance. 29August 2012

Helicopter Dynamic Components Project. Presented at: HCAT Meeting January 2006

Membrane Wing Aerodynamics for µav Applications

Quarterly Progress Report

Open & Evolutive UAV Architecture

DEVELOPMENT OF COMPACT VARIABLE- VOLTAGE, BI-DIRECTIONAL 100KW DC-DC CONVERTER

Hydro-Piezoelectricity: A Renewable Energy Source For Autonomous Underwater Vehicles

Hybrid Components: Motors and Power Electronics

Fuel Efficient ground vehicle Demonstrator (FED) Vision

Up-Coming Diesel Fuel and Exhaust Emissions Regulations For Mobile Sources. Parminder Khabra RDECOM-TARDEC TACOM LCMC March 22, 2006 JSEM

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards SCP Science (Conostan) Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100, and D12-XXX Series Standards

IMPACT OF FIRE RESISTANT FUEL BLENDS ON FORMATION OF OBSCURING FOG

Program Overview. Chris Mocnik Robotic Vehicle Control Architecture for FCS ATO Manager U.S. Army RDECOM TARDEC

Impact of 200 ppm HiTEC 4898C Lubricity Improver Additive (LIA) on F-76 Fuel Coalescence

A GENERAL PURPOSE VEHICLE POWERTRAIN MODELING AND SIMULATION SOFTWARE - VPSET

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

IMPACT OF FRICTION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGIES ON FUEL ECONOMY FOR GROUND VEHICLES G. R. Fenske, R. A. Erck, O. O. Ajayi, A. Masoner, and A. S.

SIO Shipyard Representative Bi-Weekly Progress Report

GVSET Power & Energy Preview Mr. Chuck Coutteau Associate Director (Acting) Ground Vehicle Power & Mobility 19 August 2009

Survey of Commercial Small Lithium Polymer Batteries

Center for Ground Vehicle Development and Integration

US Army CERDEC: Fuel Cell Testing Update

Predator B: The Multi-Role UAV

ITC-Germany Visit. Chuck Coutteau, Associate Director Ground Vehicle Power and Mobility Overview 10 November 2011

Additives to Increase Fuel Heat Sink Capacity

Power Analysis of an Automated Dynamic Cone Penetrometer

NoFoam Unit Installation, Evaluation and Operations Manual

Transcription:

Evaluation of Saft Ultra High Power Lithium Ion Cells (VL5U) by Jan L. Allen, Jeff Wolfenstine, Kang Xu, Donald Porschet, Thomas Salem, Wesley Tipton, Wishvender Behl, Jeff Read, T. Richard Jow, and Sonya Gargies ARL-TR-4731 February 29 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

NOTICES Disclaimers The findings in this report are not to be construed as an official Department of the Army position unless so designated by other authorized documents. Citation of manufacturer s or trade names does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use thereof. Destroy this report when it is no longer needed. Do not return it to the originator.

Army Research Laboratory Adelphi, MD 2783-1197 ARL-TR-4731 February 29 Evaluation of Saft Ultra High Power Lithium Ion Cells (VL5U) Jan L. Allen, Jeff Wolfenstine, Kang Xu, Donald Porschet, Thomas Salem, Wesley Tipton, Wishvender Behl, Jeff Read, T. Richard Jow Sensors and Electron Devices Directorate, ARL and Sonya Gargies U.S. Army Tank-Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 74-188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (74-188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 124, Arlington, VA 2222-432. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) February 29 2. REPORT TYPE Final 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Evaluation of Saft Ultra High Power Lithium Ion Cells (VL5U) 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) January through June 28 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) Jan L. Allen, Jeff Wolfenstine, Kang Xu, Donald Porschet, Thomas Salem, Wesley Tipton, Wishvender Behl, Jeff Read, T. Richard Jow, and Sonya Gargies 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U.S. Army Research Laboratory ATTN: AMSRD-ARL-SE-DC 28 Powder Mill Road Adelphi, MD 2783-1197 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER ARL-TR-4731 1. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S) 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT We evaluated Saft Ultra High Power (UHP) cells (Saft designation VL5U) to determine their rate capability, low temperature performance, storage, and cycle life. The energy and power density at 5 A (1C) were 45 Wh/kg and 55 W/kg, respectively; at 1 A (2C) were 25 Wh/kg and 1 kw/kg, respectively; and at a 5 A rate, the energy densities were 35, 29, and 29 Wh/kg at 2, 2, and 4 C, respectively, and the power densities were 4.3, 3.9, and 3.6 kw/kg, respectively. The VL5U showed a high rate of self-discharge (tested at 7 C). Our cycling testing showed that high rate cycling degrades the cell faster than high temperature cycling, revealing significant self-heating at high rates of discharge. These results indicate the cell design is immature; further development will remediate the high self-discharge rates and the self-heating during high rate discharge. Pulse discharge testing using a capacitive load showed that, at an output voltage of 2 V, a pulsed current of 875 A may be achieved. The minimum cell resistance from the pulse testing was measured to be about.23 mω. 15. SUBJECT TERMS Lithium ion batteries, high power, low temperature 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: a. REPORT U b. ABSTRACT U c. THIS PAGE U 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT UU ii 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Jan Allen 24 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) 31-394-291 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8/98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39.18

Contents List of Figures List of Tables iv v 1. Introduction 1 2. Approach 1 3. Results 2 3.1 Discharge Behavior at Room Temperature...2 3.2 Discharge at Subzero Temperatures ( 2 C and 4 C)...4 3.3 Self-Heating of Cells During High Rate Discharge...7 3.4 Discharge at 6 C...8 3.5 Summary of Temperature Testing...9 3.6 Storage Life at Elevated Temperature (7 C)...1 3.7 Capacity Retention Under Different Cycling Conditions...11 3.8 High Pulsed-current Discharge Measurements...11 3.9 Future Plans...14 4. Conclusions 14 Distribution 16 iii

List of Figures Figure 1. Configuration of Saft UHP cell during discharge. The cell was discharged inside an environmental chamber and the exterior temperature of the cell was monitored by a thermocouple...2 Figure 2. Voltage and discharge capacity as a function of rate of discharge at 2 C. The baseline capacity is ~5 Ah at room temperature...3 Figure 3. Room temperature performance plotted as a specific energy versus specific power chart (Ragone plot). The data points are shown in red and a trend line is shown as a dotted black line...4 Figure 4. Discharge capacity and voltage of Saft UHP cells as a function of temperature at fixed rate of 5 A. All cells were charged at 1C (5A) and 2 C and discharged at 1C (5 A) at three temperatures; the baseline capacity is the capacity obtained using a 5 A discharge at 2 C....5 Figure 5. Two cells in series configuration used for testing of discharge at 4 and 2 C and 1 A...6 Figure 6. Discharge curve of two cells in series at 4 C and 1 A. The black curve is voltage and the red curve is exterior cell temperature....6 Figure 7. Discharge curve of two cells in series at 2 C and 1 A. The black curve is voltage and the red curve is exterior cell temperature....7 Figure 8. Self-heating of Saft UHP cell during 5 A, 4 C discharge....7 Figure 9. Self-heating of Saft UHP cell during 5 A, 2 C discharge....8 Figure 1. Discharge capacity at 6 C as a function of discharge rate....8 Figure 11. Specific energy and power density at 1C and 2C rates as a function of temperature....9 Figure 12. Initial voltage drop at 1C and 2C as a function of temperature...1 Figure 13. The temporary and permanent capacity loss of Saft UHP cells after periods of 7- day storage at 7 C. The 7 C cycling data are also plotted for comparison....1 Figure 14. The capacity retention of Saft UHP cells under different conditions: (1) charged at 1C (5 A) and then discharged at 2C (1 A) at room temperature; (2) cycled at 1C (5 A) at high temperature and (3) cycled at 1C (5 A) at room temperature as benchmark. The cutoff range of 2.5 ~4.1 V corresponds to 1% of the designed depth-of-charge...11 Figure 15. Simplified schematic of the pulsed-current battery test circuit...12 Figure 16. Pulsed-current battery evaluation stand...12 Figure 17. Pulsed response of two, VL5U cells connected in series. A peak current of 484 A with a pulse-width of 1.1 ms (full width at half maximum) is given by the blue trace and instantaneous cell voltages are given by the red and green traces....13 Figure 18. Projected cell output voltage as a function of pulsed load currents....14 iv

List of Tables Table 1. Characteristics of the Saft VL5U cells....1 Table 2. Room temperature energy and power of Saft VL5U cell as a function of rate of discharge....4 Table 3. Summary of rate and temperature testing...9 v

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. vi

1. Introduction The objective of this report is to evaluate the performance of Saft Ultra High Power (UHP) (Saft designation VL5U) lithium-ion cells and determine applicability for Army applications. This report includes the data and their analysis. The characteristics of the Saft VL5U cells are shown in table 1. Table 1. Characteristics of the Saft VL5U cells. Mass: ~35 g Dimensions: 15.23 cm length x 3.37 cm diameter cylindrical Volume: ~136 ml Capacity: ~5 Ah Energy: ~2 Wh (72 Joules) Avg. Discharge Voltage: ~3.8 V Energy Density: ~57 Wh/kg (163 Wh/liter) Chemistry of Electrodes: LiNi 1-x-y Co x Al y O 2 / Carbon Impedances: Via Pulse Discharge:.21-.24 mω (see 3.7) AC-1Hz:.3 mω (data provided by Saft) 2 sec:.8 mω (data provided by Saft) 2. Approach Saft UHP cells were subjected to high rate discharge testing at currents up to 1 A (2C) using a Maccor battery cycler and pulse discharge testing using a capacitive load. In order to obtain the baseline capacity, cells were first equilibrated at 2 C in an environmental chamber and then charged at a constant 5 A current to 4.1 V, followed by a constant voltage charge at 4.1 V until the charging current was less than.1 A. We then measured the baseline capacity using a constant current discharge at 5 A to 2.5 V, and conducted temperature testing from 7 C down to 4 C. Prior to discharge, we determined a baseline performance of each cell by cycling at 1C (5 A) rate at room temperature, and after the low and high temperature discharge, we again cycled the cell at the 1C rate (room temperature) to determine if the performance had degraded as a result of the low/high temperature discharge. Additionally, we evaluated the cycle 1

life by cycling at a 1C rate at elevated temperature (7 C) and at 2C at 2 C. Figure 1 shows a cell as configured for discharge. A thermocouple was attached to the exterior of the cell by black electrical tape. Figure 1. Configuration of Saft UHP cell during discharge. The cell was discharged inside an environmental chamber and the exterior temperature of the cell was monitored by a thermocouple. 3. Results 3.1 Discharge Behavior at Room Temperature The discharge capacity was evaluated at 5 A (1C) and 1 A ( 2C). We set the cutoff voltage of the discharge at 2.5 V for 2 C testing. We also obtained the discharge capacity at 25 A at room temperature. Figure 2 shows the discharge capacity of a single cell as a function of the rate of discharge at 2 C, normalized to 1C capacity. The cell is able to deliver about 75% of the 1C (5 A) discharge capacity while discharging at the 2C (1 A) rate. Clearly, the voltage is significantly lower at 1 A; the average voltage during discharge at 1C is about 3.6 V and at 2C around 3.1 V. 2

4.5 4 Cell Voltage (V) 3.5 3 2.5 1 A 5 A 5 A 25 A 2 2 4 6 8 1 Percent of Baseline Capacity Figure 2. Voltage and discharge capacity as a function of rate of discharge at 2 C. The baseline capacity is ~5 Ah at room temperature. As a means to compare the data in the context of the current state of the art for rechargeable cells, we plotted the 2 C discharge data on a Ragone-type plot of specific energy versus specific power. The baseline chart was provided courtesy of Saft. Figure 3 shows these data and table 2 tabulates them. In figure 3, the data points for the Saft UHP cells are shown as red rectangles and the rate of discharge is indicated next to each rectangle in red text as C-rate, C = 5 A. 3

Figure 3. Room temperature performance plotted as a specific energy versus specific power chart (Ragone plot). The data points are shown in red and a trend line is shown as a dotted black line. Note: The data point at 4C is from the IAT (University of Texas) data and the baseline chart is courtesy of Saft. Table 2. Room temperature energy and power of Saft VL5U cell as a function of rate of discharge. Rate Energy Power Wh / kg Wh / liter kw / kg kw / liter 1C (5 A constant) 57 146.52.13 5C (25 A constant) 47 121.58 1.5 1C (5 A constant) 42 18 4.7 12 2C (1 A constant) 36 93 8.7 22 4C (2 A constant) a 27 69 14 36 a The data point at 4C is from the IAT (University of Texas) data. It is clear that the cell has been optimized for high specific power at the expense of specific energy. A lithium ion cell optimized for specific energy can attain close to 2 Wh /kg, but the specific power of such a cell is generally in the 1 to 1 W/kg range, which is much lower than the 14 kw/kg attained for the Saft UHP cell at 4C. 3.2 Discharge at Subzero Temperatures ( 2 C and 4 C) We next evaluated the performance at high rate and subzero temperature. The cutoff voltage was 2 V for these subzero tests. At 1 A, the cell voltage dropped below the cutoff voltage of 2 V and minimal discharge capacity was observed. At a 5 A discharge, the voltage drops very 4

close to 2 V at 4 C, but remains above 2 V so we were able to obtain discharge capacities at three temperatures at this rate. Figure 4 shows these results. The baseline capacity refers to the 1C capacity of each cell at room temperature. We observed an initial voltage drop at the subzero temperatures. The voltage recovers as the cell self-heats and the cells are able to attain close to the same discharge capacity at all three temperatures with a penalty in voltage at the subzero temperatures. As noted, discharge at 4 C and 2 C and 1 A for a single cell led to an immediate drop to below the cutoff voltage of 2 V, the lower limit of our Maccor battery cycler; therefore, we then discharged two cells in series to overcome this equipment limitation. Figure 5 shows the experimental setup. 4.5 4 3.5 T = -4 C 5 Amp T = -2 C 5 Amp T = 2C 5 Amp Cell Voltage 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Percent of Baseline Capacity Figure 4. Discharge capacity and voltage of Saft UHP cells as a function of temperature at fixed rate of 5 A. All cells were charged at 1C (5A) and 2 C and discharged at 1C (5 A) at three temperatures; the baseline capacity is the capacity obtained using a 5 A discharge at 2 C. 5

Figure 5. Two cells in series configuration used for testing of discharge at 4 and 2 C and 1 A. The discharge curves of the two cells in series at 4 and 2 C are shown in figures 6 and 7, respectively. At 4 C, there is an immediate drop of about 3.6 to 4.5 V (2.25 V single cell equivalence). The voltage further drops to a minimum of 2.77 V (1.39 V single cell). The voltage begins to recover as self-heating of the cell occurs and reaches a maximum voltage of 5.11 V (2.56 V single cell equivalence) before sloping back down as the cells are discharged. At 2 C, there is an immediate drop of about 2.4 to 5.7 V (2.85 V single cell). The voltage further drops to a minimum of 4.4 V (2.2 V single cell). The voltage begins to recover as self-heating of the cell occurs and reaches a maximum voltage of 5.2 V (2.51 V single cell) before sloping back down as the cells are discharged. Cell Voltage [V] 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 Percent of Baseline Capacity -5-1 -15-2 -25-3 -35-4 -45 Ext. Cell Temperature [ºC] Figure 6. Discharge curve of two cells in series at 4 C and 1 A. The black curve is voltage and the red curve is exterior cell temperature. 6

Cell Voltage [V] 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 5-5 -1-15 Ext. Cell Temperature (º C) -2 2 4 6 8 1 Percent of Baseline Capacity Figure 7. Discharge curve of two cells in series at 2 C and 1 A. The black curve is voltage and the red curve is exterior cell temperature. 3.3 Self-Heating of Cells During High Rate Discharge Figures 6 and 7 also show the heat rise during the 1 A discharge at 2 C and 4 C, respectively. In figure 6, we observe a rise in temperature from 4 to 6 C. In figure 7, we observe a rise in temperature from 2 to 1 C. Figures 8 and 9 shows the heat rise during the 5 A discharge at 2 C and 4 C, respectively. In figure 8, we observe a rise in temperature from 4 to 1 C. In figure 9, we observe a rise in temperature from 2 to 5 C. 4 1 3.5 Cell Voltage 3 2.5 2-1 -2-3 Ext.Cell Temp. (ºC) 1.5-4 1-5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Percent of Baseline Capacity Figure 8. Self-heating of Saft UHP cell during 5 A, 4 C discharge. 7

4 15 3.5 5 Cell Voltage 3 2.5 2-5 -15-25 Ext. Cell Temp. (ºC) 1.5-35 1-45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Percent of Baseline Capacity 3.4 Discharge at 6 C Figure 9. Self-heating of Saft UHP cell during 5 A, 2 C discharge. The performance at 6 C at multiple discharge rates and 5 A (1C) charging rate is shown in figure 1. The discharge currents used were 5 A, 25 A, 5 A, 6 A, 8 A, and 1 A. At the elevated temperature, the cells are able to achieve close to 9% of the discharge capacity up to 1 A. The voltage is reduced about.3 V for the 1 A discharge compared to the 5 A discharge. 4.5 4 Voltage vs Li [V] 3.5 3 2.5 5 Amps 25 Amps 5 Amps 6 Amps 8 Amps 1 Amps 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Percent of Baseline Capacity Figure 1. Discharge capacity at 6 C as a function of discharge rate. 8

3.5 Summary of Temperature Testing Temperature testing is summarized in table 3. The data at rates of 1C and 2C are plotted in figure 11 in order to show more clearly the effect of temperature on the specific power and specific energy of the cell. There is a clear drop in both specific energy and specific power as the temperature is decreased and the rate decreases. The effect of a drop in temperature from 6 to 4 C is more pronounced than the difference caused by the increase in rate. Figure 12 illustrates the effect on voltage of change in temperature during discharge. There is a large drop in the voltage as the temperature decreases. Table 3. Summary of rate and temperature testing. Temp. C Rate Energy Density Power Density ΔV C (1C = 5A) t= Wh/kg Wh/liter kw/kg kw/liter 2 1C. 57 146.55.14 6 1C. 55 141.52.13 2 5C.1 47 121.58 1.5 6 5C.1 52 134 2.5 6.4 4 1C 1.4 29 75 3.6 9.3 2 1C.9 29 75 3.8 9.8 2 1C.3 42 18 4.7 12 6 1C.1 49 126 4.9 13 6 12C.2 48 123 5.9 15 6 16C.2 46 118 7.7 2. 4 2C 1.8 26 67 5.9 15 2 2C 1.2 24 62 6.3 16 2 2C.6 36 93 8.7 22 6 2C.3 44 113 9.5 24 Energy Density (Wh / kg) 6 5 4 3 2 1 Energy Density (2C) Energy Density (1C) Power Density (2C) Power Density (1C) 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Power Density (kw / kg) -4-2 2 4 6 Temperature (ºC) Figure 11. Specific energy and power density at 1C and 2C rates as a function of temperature. 9

2 1.8 1.6 1.4 ΔVt= 1.2 1.8 2 C (1A) 1 C (5A).6.4.2-4 -2 2 4 6 Temperature (ºC) Figure 12. Initial voltage drop at 1C and 2C as a function of temperature. Clearly from these data shown in figures 11 and 12, there is room for improvement in the low temperature performance of these cells, though the decrease in performance at low temperature is probably not worse than state-of-the-art lithium ion cells. We would need comparable data from a similar cell for comparison. 3.6 Storage Life at Elevated Temperature (7 C) We evaluated the storage life of the cells at 7 C after 7 days of storage. Figure 13 shows those results. It seems the cell has high self-discharge rate. 12 1 8 6 continuous cycling at 7 o C recovered capacity 4 2-2 after 7 day storage at 7 o C 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 Cycle Number Figure 13. The temporary and permanent capacity loss of Saft UHP cells after periods of 7-day storage at 7 C. The 7 C cycling data are also plotted for comparison. 1

The capacity will be almost entirely lost after 7-days storage. Although about 8% of nominal capacity can be recovered by recharging, the fade rate is even higher than 7 C cycling. This test is incomplete and ongoing; more data from different cells are needed for confirmation. 3.7 Capacity Retention Under Different Cycling Conditions We evaluated the capacity retention of the cells under different cycling conditions. The results (figure 14) suggest that a high discharge rate degrades the cell capacity faster than high temperature cycling does. The reason might be the buildup of interfacial resistance caused by electrolyte decomposition. The core temperature of the cell during the 1 A discharge must be higher than 7 C. Suggestion: An improved cell design with a better heat-dissipation mechanism might be able to significantly enhance the capacity retentions under the condition of high rate discharge. 12 1 Capacity Retention (%) 8 6 4 2 1 A (2 C) Discharge at 25 ºC 5 A (1C) cycling at 7 ºC 5A (1C) cycling at 25 ºC 2 4 6 8 1 Cycle Number Figure 14. The capacity retention of Saft UHP cells under different conditions: (1) charged at 1C (5 A) and then discharged at 2C (1 A) at room temperature; (2) cycled at 1C (5 A) at high temperature and (3) cycled at 1C (5 A) at room temperature as benchmark. The cutoff range of 2.5 ~4.1 V corresponds to 1% of the designed depth-of-charge. 3.8 High Pulsed-current Discharge Measurements We assessed the high pulsed-current capability of the VL5U cells by using a capacitive load, as shown in the schematic of figure 15. We series-connected two, cells (DUT1 and DUT2) with the capacitor load using a thyristor. The capacitive load allowed us to tailor the pulse shape and ensure that a short-circuit condition was not inadvertently applied to the cells. Next, we connected 4 electrolytic capacitors (Cornell-Dubilier, CGS253U16R4C) in parallel using a pair of copper plates giving a total capacitance of approximately 1 F and an equivalent series resistance(esr) of approximately.4 m. Once gated on, the thyristor (Vishay, ST333C8CFM) completed the circuit allowing the capacitor bank to charge. Because the on- 11

state voltage of the thyristor is approximately 3 V at 5 A and, under load, the output voltage of the VL5U battery was expected drop from 4.1 V to 2.5 V, two cells were required. The resistor-capacitor snubber circuit connected across the thyristor prevented inadvertent dv/dt triggering of the thyristor as the circuit was being assembled. Also, the capacitor bank was completely discharged through a 1 k resistor prior to each test. Figure 15. Simplified schematic of the pulsed-current battery test circuit. Figure 16 shows a photograph of the test stand. We mounted the two batteries-under-test on the capacitor load and mounted the thyristor at the opposing ends of the batteries. We used Rigowski current probes (PEM, CWT3) to measure the pulsed currents. Figure 16. Pulsed-current battery evaluation stand. 12

Figure 17 shows the responses of the VL5U cells taken at a case temperature of 18 C. Prior to testing, the cells were fully charged. The green trace of figure 16 shows the instantaneous voltage of cell X835-4 during the first discharge pulse and the red trace shows the instantaneous voltage of cell X835-22 during the fourth discharge pulse. The blue trace is the cell current and shows a rise-time (1 9%) of 25 s. From this data, the minimum cell resistances are.21 m and.24 m for cell X835-4 and X835-22, respectively. 5 5 4 4 Cell Voltage (V) 3 2 1 X835-22 X835-4 Current 3 2 1 Current (A) -1-1 1 2 3 4 Time (ms) -1 Figure 17. Pulsed response of two, VL5U cells connected in series. A peak current of 484 A with a pulse-width of 1.1 ms (full width at half maximum) is given by the blue trace and instantaneous cell voltages are given by the red and green traces. Parasitic impedances limit the maximum peak currents obtainable in this test configuration. The capacitor bank has an ESR of approximately.4 m and the thyristor on-state resistance is approximately.5 m at high current levels. By matching experimental data with circuit simulations, we estimated the total circuit inductance to be 22 nh. Figure 18 gives the projected cell performance assuming an ideal short-circuit load. At an output voltage of 2 V, a pulsed output current of approximately 875 A may be achieved. 13

Output voltage (V) 5 4 3 2 1 Pulse width = 1 ms 25 5 75 1 Load current (A) 3.9 Future Plans Figure 18. Projected cell output voltage as a function of pulsed load currents. Additional pulsed discharge cell characterizations are needed to better understand the VL5U lithium-ion cell technology. These characterizations may include testing over the military temperature range, maximum charging rate, and short-circuit survivability. Repeating select tests may be useful in order to assess cell to cell variability. 4. Conclusions Our results show that the Saft UHP cells have a high rate capability with about 8% of baseline capacity (5 A, 1C rate, room temperature) accessed at a 1 A (2C) rate of discharge the voltage was depressed during the high rate discharge by about.6 V. At low temperatures, 2 C and 4 C, we obtained about 8% of the baseline capacity at a 5 A (1C) rate; however, the voltage was further depressed to a remaining voltage below 3 V during the entire discharge. At 2 C, the voltage was depressed by up to 1 V relative to the room temperature discharge during the initial time of discharge and at 4 C, the voltage was depressed by up to 1.7 V during the initial time of discharge. Storage life testing at 7 C suggests a high rate of self-discharge. Cycling at different conditions suggests that high rate cycling degrades the cell faster than high temperature cycling, which implies that significant self-heating occurs at high rates of discharge. Measurements of cells tested at 4 C and 2 C showed an external cell temperature of 1 C and 5 C, respectively, at the end of discharge. The core cell temperatures were clearly higher.an improved cell design with a better heat-dissipation mechanism might be 14

able to significantly enhance the capacity retention under the condition of high rate discharge. The storage life is not as good as other versions of cells; improvement is needed. Finally, pulse discharge testing using a capacitive load showed that, at an output voltage of 2 V, a pulsed current of 875 A may be achieved. 15

No. of Copies Organization No. of Copies Organization 1 ADMNSTR ELEC DEFNS TECHL INFO CTR ATTN DTIC OCP 8725 JOHN J KINGMAN RD STE 944 FT BELVOIR VA 226-6218 1 DARPA ATTN IXO S WELBY 371 N FAIRFAX DR ARLINGTON VA 2223-1714 1 CD OFC OF THE SECY OF DEFNS ATTN ODDRE (R&AT) THE PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 231-38 1 US ARMY RSRCH DEV AND ENGRG CMND ARMAMENT RSRCH DEV AND ENGRG CTR ARMAMENT ENGRG AND TECHNLGY CTR ATTN AMSRD AAR AEF T J MATTS BLDG 35 ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD 215-51 1 PM TIMS, PROFILER (MMS-P) AN/TMQ-52 ATTN B GRIFFIES BUILDING 563 FT MONMOUTH NJ 773 1 US ARMY INFO SYS ENGRG CMND ATTN AMSEL IE TD F JENIA FT HUACHUCA AZ 85613-53 1 COMMANDER US ARMY RDECOM ATTN AMSRD AMR W C MCCORKLE 54 FOWLER RD REDSTONE ARSENAL AL 35898-5 1 US GOVERNMENT PRINT OFF DEPOSITORY RECEIVING SECTION ATTN MAIL STOP IDAD J TATE 732 NORTH CAPITOL ST NW WASHINGTON DC 242 1 US ARMY RSRCH LAB ATTN AMSRD ARL CI OK TP TECHL LIB T LANDFRIED BLDG 46 ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD 215-566 1 DIRECTOR US ARMY RSRCH LAB ATTN AMSRD ARL RO EV W D BACH PO BOX 12211 RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK NC 2779 12 US ARMY RSRCH LAB ATTN AMSRD ARL SE DC C XU ATTN AMSRD ARL CI OK PE TECHL PUB ATTN AMSRD ARL CI OK TL TECHL LIB ATTN AMSRD ARL SE DC W BEHL ATTN AMSRD ARL SE DC J ALLEN ATTN AMSRD ARL SE DC J READ ATTN AMSRD ARL SE DC J WOLFENSTINE ATTN AMSRD ARL SE DC R JOW ATTN AMSRD ARL SE DP D PORSCHET ATTN AMSRD ARL SE DP T SALEM ATTN AMSRD ARL SE DP W TIPTON ATTN IMNE ALC HR MAIL & RECORDS MGMT ADELPHI MD 2783-1197 TOTAL: 23 (1 ELEC, 1 CD, 21 HCS) 1 US ARMY TANK-AUTOMOTIVE RSRCH DEVEL AND ENG CTR ATTN S GARGIES 651 E. 11 MILE RD BLDG 312 MS 121 WARREN MI WARREN, MI 48397 16