MK 66 ROCKET MOTOR/HELICOPTER COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM 27 MARCH 2003 ERIC HAWLEY Contact Information Ph: (301) 744-1822 Fax: (301) 744-4410 hawleyej@ih.navy.mil INDIAN HEAD DIVISION NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER INDIAN HEAD, MD 1
Helicopter Engine Compatibility Background Problem description: AH-1F downed with fatalities in 1988 while firing MK 66 Rocket Motors Army investigation concluded that the accident was caused by engine ingestion of high-temperature, oxygen-depleted rocket exhaust gasses AH-1 physical mod implemented (air scoop) 2
Helicopter Engine Compatibility Background AH-64 testing identifies rocket exhaust ingestion into engines still a problem Causes engine torque splits and torque fluctuations (surges) Physical mod to aircraft considered not practical Firing restrictions in effect 3
Helicopter Engine Compatibility Background High temperature oxygen depleted rocket exhaust caused by secondary combustion Secondary combustion (afterburning) occurs when CO and H 2 in the exhaust react with oxygen in atmosphere Current MK 66 exhaust components Combustion Component Exit Composition (mole fraction) CO 2 0.1898 CO 0.33007 H 2 O 0.18146 H 2 0.17295 N 2 0.12218 Pb 0.00177 Cu 0.00177 4
MK 66 Rocket Motor Background Motor Case Igniter K 2 SO 4 Salt Rod Propellant Grain Nozzle MK 66 MOD 4 ROCKET MOTOR 5
Helicopter Engine Compatibility Approach Secondary combustion can be suppressed by introducing more potassium sulfate (K 2 SO 4 ) into motor exhaust Mod 0-4 Salt Rod addresses rocket exhaust ingestion issue in fixed wing aircraft Helicopter ingestion situation is the same Ingestion timeline is different Existing salt rod consumed in 6 feet of motion Helicopters need salt rod effect through rotor downwash Army Aviation Engineering specifies 30 feet as necessary 30 FEET 6
Salt Rod Modification There is a linear relationship between salt volume and duration of afterburning suppression Amount and shape of salt rod modified to increase effectiveness for 30 feet Enlarged salt rod contains ~ 3x more K 2 SO 4 MOD 4 0.5 INCH DIA X 6 INCH LONG SALT ROD 0.33 INCH DIA X 4 INCH LONG SALT ROD Modified 0.5 INCH DIA X 15.3 INCH LONG SALT ROD 7
Exhaust Chemical Analysis K 2 SO 4 reactions Afterburning reaction: 2CO + 3H 2 + 2OH + 2O 2 => 2CO 2 + 4H 2 O Atmospheric oxygen Reaction with K 2 SO 4 : K 2 SO 4 + 2CO + 3H 2 + 2OH + 2O 2 => 2CO 2 + 3H 2 O + H 2 S + KO + K + 2O 2 K 2 SO 4 provides oxygen to the exhaust, which delays the overall reaction of the exhaust fuels (H 2 and CO) with the atmospheric oxygen (O 2 ) 8
Static Fire Test 9
Static Fire Test Results Motor exhaust temperature found to be more than 20% lower than current MK 66 motors at 77 F and 150 F Steady State Temperatures 0 Time (msec) 250 10
Ground Launch Results Suppressed flight distance >30 ft average MK 66 MOD 3 ROCKET MOTOR (150 F) Launcher HELICOPTER COMPATIBILITY ROCKET MOTOR (150 F) Suppressed Distance Launcher 11
Ground Launch Results Ground launch thermal data MK 66 MOD 3 ROCKET MOTOR (150 F) HELICOPTER COMPATIBILITY ROCKET MOTOR (150 F) LAUNCHER LAUNCHER 12
Air Launch Verification Air launch test on an instrumented AH-64A with MK 66 motors w/ enlarged salt rod conducted in 1998 Test conditions 10 knot wind restrictions Altitude was 150 ft Air temperature was in upper 70s, 70-80% RH Test pass/fail criteria: Torque split exceeds 15%, Main engine torque fluctuations of ±15%, Tail rotor torque fluctuations of ±500 ft-lbs 13
Air Launch Results All engine surge conditions eliminated except one Hover: All surge conditions eliminated 40 kts forward flight: All conditions but one eliminated CONDITION LEFT OUTBOARD LEFT INBOARD RIGHT INBOARD RIGHT OUTBOARD MK 66 MOD 3 HELICOPTER COMP ROCKET ROCKETS ROCKET ROCKETS ROCKET ROCKETS ROCKET ROCKETS ROCKET MOTOR ROCKET MOTOR DENSITY FIRED DENSITY FIRED DENSITY FIRED DENSITY FIRED 10 2 8 8 12 12 19 19 19 19 19 19 HOVER 14 2 1 TESTED TWICE 12 4 1 TESTED TWICE 16 4 12 12 19 19 8 8 19 2 17 2 15 2 19 2/1 1 1, 1 (NOTE 1) 17 2/1 1 1 (NOTE 2) 40 KTAS 15 2 FORWARD 2 2 19 2 1 TESTED TWICE 17 2 1 TESTED TWICE 15 2 1 TESTED TWICE 12 4 12 4 1 TESTED TWICE 14 8 8 8 8 5
Air Launch Results (cont.) Worst condition: 40 kts forward flight, one or two rockets fired from left inboard launcher 15
Internal Pressure Concerns Enlarged salt rod causes ignition pressure spikes Enlarged salt rod known to increase pressure, and therefore thrust during ~ 0.10 second of burn Measured thrust values near MK 66 specification limit of 2100 lbf Thrust Curve Comparison 3000 Thrust (lbf) 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Thrust Limit = 2350 lbf Thrust Limit = 2100 lbf 0.7 s 0.5 s Thrust Limit = 2900 lbf MOD 4 Modified 0-500 0 0.05 0.11 0.16 0.21 0.26 0.32 0.37 0.42 0.47 0.53 0.58 0.63 0.68 0.74 0.79 0.84 0.89 0.95 1 1.05 1.1 1.16 Time (sec) 16
Pressure Differential Test Thrust requirement derived from internal forward end measured pressures Aft end known to be weakest point on motor (lockwire joint) Efforts made to measure pressure at aft end Lockwire joint 17
Pressure Differential Test Pressure differential test performed at Indian Head in June 2002 Previous analysis predicted a 350-500 psi drop at 150 o F Aft pressures measured ~400 psi lower than forward end during first 0.10 seconds at 150 o F Pressure Comparison 2500 2000 Pressure (psi) 1500 1000 500 0 Head Pressure Lockwire Pressure -500 0 0.06 0.11 0.17 0.22 0.28 0.33 0.39 0.44 0.5 0.55 0.61 0.66 Time (sec) 0.72 0.77 0.83 0.88 0.94 0.99 1.05 1.1 1.16 18
Pressure Differential Test Results Thrust limit redefined based on aft end pressures Recommended a new thrust limit of 2500 lbf for the first 0.10 seconds of burn Maintains motor tube factor of safety of 1.5 Verified by analysis and historical data Approved by sponsor Thrust New Curve Thrust Comparison Limit 3000 Thrust Limit = 2500 lbf Thrust Limit = 2350 lbf Thrust (lbf) 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Thrust Limit = 2100 lbf 0.1 s 0.5 s Thrust Limit = 2900 lbf 0.7 s MOD 4 Modified 0-500 0 0.05 0.11 0.16 0.21 0.26 0.32 0.37 0.42 0.47 0.53 0.58 0.63 0.68 0.74 0.79 0.84 0.89 0.95 1 1.05 1.1 1.16 Time (sec) 19
Future Work Enlarged salt rod design will be incorporated into the MK 66 MOD 6 Qualification of MOD 6 scheduled to begin in this spring Qualification includes: Environmental Tests Ground Launch Air Launch Due to enter production midway through FY04 20
Questions Contact Information ERIC HAWLEY Ph: : (301) 744-1822 Fax: (301) 744-4410 hawleyej@ih ih.navy.mil 21