Emissions for the ferry routes: 1) Rødby - Puttgarden, 2) Gedser - Rostock and 3) Trelleborg - Rostock

Similar documents
Fixed Link across the Fehmarn Belt Effect on Emissions to Air

Johannes Johannesson Naval Architect, FRINA, MIDA

Marin gas logistics. Work package 5. D5-5 Environmental studies - assessment of air emissions in terminal ports

Automotive sector the driver of future PGM demand PDAC March 2005 Bob Gilmour Overview

PRESS RELEASE TEU ULTRA LARGE CONTAINER VESSEL

ECA Compliance & PM. Thomas Kirk Director of Environmental Programs. Ottawa, Canada 9 September 2014

Pollution by the Shipping Industry: Current Vessels and the Next Generation of Ships

RESEARCH ON INFLUENCE OF SELECTED FAILURES ON THE EXHAUST GAS CONTENT OF SHIP DIESEL ENGINE WORKING ON HEAVY FUEL OIL

Baltic Sea Parliamentary Conference. MARPOL Annex VI TECHNOLOGY & COMPLIANCE. Ramona Zettelmaier Lloyd s Register

NOx control policy options for shipping in EU Seas. BLUE SKY OVER THE SEA? Conference Berlin, November 2016

Enforcement - the way to cleaner shipping and a fair business

Laivanrakennuksen kilpailutekijät tulevaisuudessa- vanha toimiala, uudet kujeet Jari Anttila, STX Finland

Background, structure and objectives of the EffShip project

Field experience with considerably reduced NOx and Smoke Emissions

Reducing Exhaust Emissions from Wärtsilä Marine Engines Moottoritekniikan seminaari Teknologiateollisuus ry 18 May 2010 Göran Hellén

Product line : Marine

ABATEMENT TECHNOLOGY, RFO vs DISTILLATE - impact on costs & emissions

Existing Design Trends for Tankers and Bulk Carriers - Design Changes for Improvement of the EEDI in the Future

Travel Forecasting Methodology

Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

RESOLUTION MEPC.251(66) Adopted on 4 April 2014

The MAGALOG Project LNG-fueled shipping in the Baltic Sea

MARINTEK The Norwegian Marine Technology Research Institute

Pioneering MTU C&I diesel engines for U.S. EPA Tier 4

Adjustment of heating values and CO 2 emission factors of petrol and diesel

Methanol a marine fuel for the future. International Methanol Conference Copenhagen May 8-10

Challenges to achieve existing and upcoming environmental regulation. Khalid Tachi EICB/EIBIP

The influence of fuel injection pump malfunctions of a marine 4-stroke Diesel engine on composition of exhaust gases

LNG: Legal and regulatory framework. Canepa Monica World Maritime University

An overview of Directive (EU) 2015/2193 from the Power Generation business perspective

Green Ship of the Future. Green Ship of the Future -

DIESEL PARTICULATE MATTER MITIGATION PLAN FOR THE BNSF RAILROAD SAN DIEGO RAIL YARD

VEHICLE EMISSIONS. ITF-SEDEMA workshop in Mexico City Norbert Ligterink

GASEOUS FUELS SAFETY ASPECTS

Internal Combustion Engines

DIFFERENTIATED PORT DUES AND EPI

The evolution of shipping emissions and the costs of regulation changes in the northern EU area

State-of-the-art and emerging truck engine technologies

Femern Baelt Fixed Link. Concrete Strategy Macro Perspective

Going the Dual Fuel Route

Improved Efficiency and Reduced CO 2

A CO2-fund for the transport industry: The case of Norway

Module 6:Emission Control for CI Engines Lecture 31:Diesel Particulate Filters (contd.) The Lecture Contains: Passive/Catalytic Regeneration

Effect of SOx and NOx Regulation Implementation, ECA s and NOx Tier III Current Developments in General

MAN Diesel & Turbo SE Exhaust gas emissions & solutions

Outlook for Marine Bunkers and Fuel Oil to A key to understanding the future of marine bunkers and fuel oil markets

Electrification and alternative fuels in Stena Line. Presentation for Zero and Maritime Clean Tech, Oslo 10 April 2018

Regulatory Update what s hot?

SOLUÇÕES DE PÓS TRATAMENTO PARA REDUÇÃO DAS EMISSÕES EM APLICAÇÕES ESTACIONÁRIAS E FORA DE ESTRADA. SIMEA 2009

Analysis of Fuel Alternatives for Commercial Ships in the ECA Era

Review of the Technical Specifications for the BCFS Intermediate Class Ferry and the provisions of the BC Ferry Commission Order 13-01

Academia, Industry and Government: together for automotive engineering development

ENVIRONMENT. The Diesel Engine and the Environment

EPA Tier 4 and the Electric Power Industry

ME-GI Engine Fuelled by LNG

Product line : Marine

A Comparative Study and Analysis of Emission Norms Adopted by Developed and Developing Nations

Biofuels in road transport and effects on air pollutants

PROPOSED REGULATIONS AMENDING THE VESSEL POLLUTION AND DANGEROUS CHEMICALS REGULATIONS

The Changing composition of bunker fuels: Implications for refiners, traders, and shipping

End users perspective

The Norwegian NOx Fund Experiences gained so far. Sveinung Oftedal

COMPUTER-BASED DESIGN TOOL FOR A FUEL EFFICIENT - LOW EMISSIONS MARINE PROPULSION PLANT

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

The introduction of 0.1% S fuels in European SECAs. Jasper Faber, 28 March 2017

SCR under pressure - pre-turbocharger NOx abatement for marine 2-stroke diesel engines

HIGH EMISSION RISKS DESPITE HIGHLY EFFICIENT EMISSION CONTROL

IMPACTS OF THE IMO SULPHUR REGULATIONS ON THE CANADIAN CRUDE OIL MARKET

Ship Energy Efficiency and Air Pollution. Ernestos Tzannatos Department of Maritime Studies University of Piraeus

INDUSTRY'S PERSPECTIVE ON THE COMPLIANCE WITH THE LOW SULPHUR REQUIREMENTS. Pulp and paper industries' views and assessment

USE OF MDO BY SHIPS THE RATIONAL BEHIND THE PROPOSAL

SPECIAL HAULING PERMITS

More persons in the cars? Status and potential for change in car occupancy rates in Norway

The road leading to the 0.50% sulphur limit and IMO s role moving forward

Emerging Environmental Rules & ECA Compliance

5 TH CIMAC CASCADES, BUSAN MARCEL OTT

Ro-Pax Ferry B145-I Basic parameters

Development of a High Efficiency Induction Motor and the Estimation of Energy Conservation Effect

Capabilities of Emission Control Technologies and their Impact on Air Quality. Expert Meeting of the EU Refining Forum Brussels 1 December 2017

Low Sulphur Fuel Oils Preliminary Estimated Costs to Canadian Industry based on European Data

Regulations relating to the Use of Vehicles, Chapter 5

Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems. (Scrubber / SCR) Dual Fuel Engines

Environmental and EnergyStrategies for Freight Transport. Dipl.-Ing. Håkan Samuelsson, Chairman of the MAN Nutzfahrzeuge Gruppe

Details RDE Legislation Europe. Speaker: Nikolas Kühn June 27th ECMA

Providing clean DPF technology for Iran. Soot-free Teheran

EMISSION ABATEMENT TECHNOLOGIES

MARTOB Application of low sulphur marine fuels New challenges for the Marine Industry. Kjell Olav Skjølsvik MARINTEK

ANNEX 12. RESOLUTION MEPC.251 (66) Adopted on 4 April 2014

Technologies for Heavy-duty Engines

Emerging Technologies

ENGINE TECHNOLOGY. Bobcat Engine_B _ _EN_reworked.indd 1

BOLK: Impact of biofuels on engine technology and emissions

APPLICATIONS OF ALTERNATIVE FUELS IN MARITIME INDUSTRY

Matthew Szuck Technical Project Manager, Customer Management FPT North America, a Brand of CNH Industrial

METHANOL AS A MARINE FUEL A SAFE, COST EFFECTIVE, CLEAN-BURNING, WIDELY AVAILABLE MARINE FUEL FOR TODAY AND THE FUTURE

Wärtsilä NO X Reducer. Environmental Efficiency

Residual Fuel Market Issues

An ETI Perspective. Natural Gas Pathway Analysis for Heavy Duty Vehicles

CNG as a Transport Fuel - Economic Benefits 17 th November 2011

A.P. Møller-Mærsk - Alfa Laval Aalborg - Hempel - MAN Diesel & Turbo - OSK-ShipTech - TORM -

Transcription:

Emissions for the ferry routes: 1) Rødby - Puttgarden, 2) Gedser - Rostock and 3) Trelleborg - Rostock Version 2010.12.12 By Hans Otto Holmegaard Kristensen Consulting Naval Architect and senior researcher Introduction It is the objective of this report to present calculations of the emissions from the ferries on the routes between 1) Roedby - Puttgarden, 2) Gedser - Rostock and 3) Trelleborg - Rostock in 2025. The paper also describes the calculation methodology, i.e. the assumptions about sailing schedule and the associated ferry technology (ferry types and development of engine technology). In connection with such long term predictions it is also important to consider the legislation and regulations on environmental issues which will have a great impact on the development of the engine technology and the quality of the fuel used by the ferries over the next decades (as example content of sulphur). Rødby - Puttgarden Today 5 ferries are sailing on the route, 4 identical ferries, built in 1997, with a capacity of 365 cars and an old small ferry Holger Danske, with a capacity of approx. 50 cars. This ferry is solely used for carriage of dangerous goods. This ferry is disregarded in the analysis described in this report. Reference for the scenario in 2025, is the transport work done in 2003 by the four double-ended ferries on the route. As the four big ferries were built in 1997 they should still have more than 30 years expected operation left before scrapping seen from a statistical point of view. Therefore they are considered still active in the 2025 scenario however in a lengthened version. According to the data supplied by COWI for this analysis the scenario with the existing ferries in a lengthened version should be sufficient while keeping the same number of crossings per year as to day, see table 1 and fig. 1 and 2. According to table 1 the traffic increase is 5162000/3217969 x 100 = 160 % from 2003 to 2025. Keeping the sailing frequency unchanged (number of sailings per ferry per year) the average utilization will slightly decrease from 32 to 30 %. Table 1 Ferry statistics including data from COWI for 2025 Rødby Puttgarden - Statistics 1997-2009 based on ShipPax Information Statistics 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2009 2025 Number of trips 32323 32424 34424 35180 34450 35578 34449 34541 34541 Number of trips (Holger Danske) 0 0 2190 2190 2190 2190 2190 2190 2190 Number of trips (remaining 4 ferries) 32323 32424 32234 32990 32260 33388 32259 32351 32351 Number of trips per remaining ferry 8081 8106 8059 8248 8065 8347 8065 8088 8088 Passenger total 5974575 5850475 5616722 5429932 6027887 6612993 6421490 6304798 6421490 Cars total 932855 968020 1016972 1182544 1382678 1589125 1574369 1667080 2377000 Busses total 35304 33889 31248 30575 32066 34673 33038 27993 48000 Trailers total 254903 264346 259191 280164 274265 275081 278482 314394 509000 Railway wagons 20095 9938 9638 9664 9344 9750 8600 8600 0 Equivalent car units 2584840 2558575 2565547 2832879 3007773 3235395 3217969 3465015 5162000 Mean capacity per ferry 294 294 290 290 290 290 291 365 502 Car equivalents per trip 80 79 75 81 87 91 93 100 149 Utilization in % 27.2 26.8 25.7 27.8 30.1 31.4 32.1 34.4 29.8 1

Mean utilization (%) Equivalent car units total 6000000 5000000 4000000 3000000 2000000 1000000 Roedby - Puttgarden ferry traffic 0 1997 2002 2007 2012 2017 2022 2027 Year Fig. 1 Development of ferry traffic in car equivalent units for Rødby - Puttgarden including assumptions in 2025 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1997 2002 2007 2012 2017 2022 2027 Year Fig. 2 Development of the mean car capacity utilization of the ferries on the Roedby-Puttgarden route since the introduction of the new ferries in 1997 Development of engine technology For the existing ferries it is assumed that the propulsion engines (diesel-electric machinery) will remain unchanged with respect to oil consumption over the rest of the operation period extending beyond 2025. 2

Ferry types The different ferry types used in the present analysis have been summarized in table 1. The ferry types are as follows: Type 0: Existing ferry type on the route without platform deck when the ferry was built in 1997 Type 1: Existing ferry type with an extra platform deck giving extra person car capacity Type 2: Existing ferry type in lengthened version (+ 40 m) The ferry alternatives are realistic alternatives for each of which a detailed route analysis has been carried out to calculate the necessary propulsion power in order to calculate the fuel oil consumption Table 2 Size and capacities for the ferry alternatives used in the analysis for Roedby - Puttgarden Ferry type Length Breadth Car capacity Lanes for Equivalent car capacity Relative fuel oil lorries *) consumption (m) (m) (person cars) (m) (person car units) (100 %) 0 134 24 128 580 290 100 1 134 24 265 290 350 102 2 174 24 95 1420 500 130 *) The equivalent car capacity has been calculated by the factors from the TEMA 2000/2010 model Exhaust gas emissions There is strong focus on the emissions from shipping especially on NOx and SO 2 emissions. According to the MARPOL Annex IV regulations and as the Baltic Sea is a so-called sulphur emission control area there will be a sulphur limit of 1.0 % in the fuel oil used on the ships sailing in this area from 2010 and this limit will be 0.1 % from 2015. The diesel engines shall also fulfil special requirements with regard to NOx emissions which have been known for some years, such that many engines built since 2000 are already fulfilling these NOx requirements, the so-called Tier I requirements. In the coming years the engine technology becomes more and more refined such that the engines will be governed more and more electronically (as example the so-called common rail technology), such that the combustion process can be controlled to minimise the exhaust emissions, especially the NOx emissions. Another measure to reduce the emissions (also the other products than NOx) is the use of exhaust gas catalysts. One of the leading companies in this market is the Danish company Haldor Topsøe A/S, which has developed catalysts not only for NOx reduction but also for reduction of unburned hydrocarbons (HC) and particles (PM). Using catalysts and other technical measures for reduction of exhaust emissions has a negative economical influence on the ships building price and on the operation costs. When these measures become more and more common the price will decrease. There will probably also be a clear political and environmental pressure which means that it will probably be normal to use engines with low NOx exhaust gas emissions. Therefore the NOx emissions have been assumed reduced by 80 % in 2025 compared with the present standard, i.e. the present NOx level at Tier I has been reduced to a Tier III level in 2025, although this is not a requirement for existing ferries (except if their engines are modified extensively). The HC and CO level are assumed unchanged while the PM level is reduced as a consequence of the lower sulphur content. The PM reduction is calculated according to TEMA 2000/2010 Based on the emission factors from TEMA 2000/2010, table 2 and the above mentioned probable reductions in emission factors revised emission factors have been calculated as shown in table 3. These factors have 3

been used for calculations of the exhaust emissions shown in table 4, where the transport capacity, energy demand and exhaust emission are listed for the selected alternatives. Table 3 Emission factors for 2025 for Roedby - Puttgarden Ferry type Type 0 Type 1 Type 2 Year of operation 2003 2025 2025 Number of car units per ferry (-) 290 365 500 Reduction in specific fuel oil consumption (%) 0 0 0 Specific fuel consumption (g/kwh) 190 190 190 Energy consumption per trip (%) 100 102 130 CO 2 emission factor (g/kg oil) 3206 3206 3206 CO 2 emission factor (g/kwh) 609 609 609 NOx emission factor (g/kwh) 12 2.4 2.4 NOx emission factor (g/kg oil) 63 12.6 12.6 Sulphur content (%) 0.75 0.1 0.1 SO 2 emission factor (g/kwh) 2.99 0.40 0.40 SO 2 emission factor (g/kg oil) 15.8 2.1 2.1 HC emission factor (g/kwh) 0.50 0.50 0.50 Catalytic HC emission factor (g/kg oil) 2.63 2.63 2.63 CO emission factor (g/kwh) 1.6 1.6 1.6 CO emission factor (g/kg oil) 8.4 8.4 8.4 Particulate emission factor (PM) (g/kg oil) 1.37 1.13 1.13 Particulate emission factor (PM) (g/kwh) 0.26 0.21 0.21 Ferry types Type 0 Type 1 Existing ferry type on Roedby-Puttgarden Existing ferry type on Roedby-Puttgarden with ex Type 2 Existing ferry in lengthened version (+ 40 m) Table 4 Calculated emissions for Roedby-Puttgarden in 2025 Ferry emission scenarios for 2025 for Roedby - Puttgarden Year 2003 2025 2025 2025 Assumed number of ferries (-) 4 4 4 4 Interpolation sheet Assumed ferry types on the route 4 x Type 0 4 x Type 1 2 x Type 1 + 2 x Type 2 4 x Type 2 2025 Transport capacity for all ferries per crossing (cars) 1160 1460 1730 2000 1861 Transport capacity in percentage (%) 100 126 149 172 160 Total oil consumption (tons/year) 35485 36195 41162 46130 43569 Total energy consumption (TJ/year) 1519 1549 1762 1974 1865 Total CO 2 emissions (tons/year) 113552 115823 131720 147617 139420 Total NOx emissions (tons/year) 2241 457 520 583 550 Total SO 2 emissions (tons/year) 559 76 86 97 91 Total HC emissions (tons/year) 93 95 108 121 115 Total CO emissions (tons/year) 299 305 347 388 367 Total PM emissions (tons/year) 49 41 46 52 49 4

Gedser - Rostock On Gedser - Rostock two new large ferries are under construction which will be in operation in 2012. These ferries will be powered by diesel engines, but they have been prepared for conversion to LNG driven operation in the future, if LNG becomes more avaiable, especially in the Baltic region, where there are already serious discussions for a possible change from diesel operation to LNG operation as is already seen in the Norwegian infrastructure at several domestic ferry routes. Emission factors as they are expected in 2025 assuming LNG operation are given in table 5. The average fuel consumption is based on values from Scandlines presented at a ferry conference on the 22 November 2010 in Skibsteknisk Selskab. Table 5 Expected emission factors for LNG operation of new ferries on the Gedser - Rostock route Ferry type Type 0 Type 0 Type 0 Year of operation 2025 2025 2025 Number of equivalent car units per ferry (-) 570 DO LNG 94% LNG + 6 % DO Specific fuel consumption (g/kwh) 190 165 167 CO 2 emission factor (g/kg fuel) 3206 2750 2777 CO 2 emission factor (g/kwh) 609 454 CO 2 emission factor (g/mj) 74.9 55.0 NOx emission factor (g/kwh) 9.6 3 3.4 NOx emission factor (g/kg oil) 51 18 20.1 Sulphur content (%) 0.1 0 SO 2 emission factor (g/kwh) 0.40 0 SO 2 emission factor (g/kg oil) 2.1 0 0.1 HC emission factor (g/kwh) 0.50 0.50 HC emission factor (g/kg oil) 2.63 2.63 2.6 CO emission factor (g/kwh) 1.6 1.60 CO emission factor (g/kg oil) 8.4 8.42 8.4 Particulate emission factor (PM) (g/kg oil) 1.13 0.23 0.3 Particulate emission factor (PM) (g/kwh) 0.21 0.04 Mean fuel consumption per trip kg/trip 3600 3155 In table 6 and fig. 3 is given the ferry statistics for the route including an assumption for 2025. Table 6 Gedser - Rostock - Statistics 2004-2009 based on ShipPax Inform 2004 2008 2009 2025 Number of trips 5577 7285 6549 6550 Number of trips per ferry 2789 3643 3275 3275 Passenger total 1264041 1642781 1516980 Cars total 212490 301625 279842 Busses total 15282 15169 13911 Trailers total 70952 106185 80040 Railway wagons 0 0 0 Equivalent car units 643660 908395 749597 1370000 Mean capacity per ferry 200 200 200 480 Car equivalents per trip 115 125 114 209 Utilization in % 57.7 62.3 57.2 43.6 5

Equivalent car units total 1600000 1400000 1200000 1000000 800000 600000 400000 Gedser - Rostock ferry traffic 200000 0 2003 2008 2013 2018 2023 2028 Year Fig. 3 Traffic on Gedser - Rostock Based on the above mentioned assumption for traffic in 2025 (6550 trips/year) the emissions have been calculated by using the basic consumption and emission figures in table 5 and the results are shown in table 7. Table 7 Emission figures for 2025 for Gedser - Rostock Year 2025 Number of crossings per year 6550 Transport capacity per ferry per crossing (cars) 480 Total fuel consumption (tons/year) 20664 Total CO 2 emissions (tons/year) 57390 Total NOx emissions (tons/year) 416 Total SO 2 emissions (tons/year) 3 Total HC emissions (tons/year) 54 Total CO emissions (tons/year) 174 Total PM emissions (tons/year) 6 Trelleborg - Rostock This route is served by two large ferries Skåne and Mecklenburg Vorpommern built in 1998 and 1996 respectively. Assuming at least 30 years operation they are assumed to be sailing on the route in 2025. As for Rødby-Puttgarden these two ferries are assumed to use oil with a sulphur content of 0.1 % and the machinery is assumed to have been upgraded to Tier III NOx level which means 80 % NOx reduction compared to the present standard (Tier I). Emission factors as they are expected in 2025 are given in table 8 6

Table 8 Expected emission factors for ferries on the Trelleborg - Rostock route in 2025 Year of operation 2025 Number of equivalent car units per ferry (-) 970 Specific fuel consumption (g/kwh) 190 CO 2 emission factor (g/kg fuel) 3206 CO 2 emission factor (g/kwh) 609 CO 2 emission factor (g/mj) 74.9 NOx emission factor (g/kwh) 2.4 NOx emission factor (g/kg oil) 13 NOx emission factor (g/mj) 0.30 Sulphur content (%) 0.1 SO 2 emission factor (g/kwh) 0.40 SO 2 emission factor (g/kg oil) 2.1 Normal HC emission factor (g/kwh) 0.50 Normal HC emission factor (g/kg oil) 2.63 CO emission factor (g/kwh) 1.6 CO emission factor (g/kg oil) 8.4 Particulate emission factor (PM) (g/kg oil) 1.13 Particulate emission factor (PM) (g/kwh) 0.21 Mean fuel consumption per trip kg/trip 17500 In table 9 and fig. 4 is given the ferry statistics for the route including an assumption for 2025. Table 9 Trelleborg - Rostock - Statistics 2004-2009 based on ShipPax Info 2004 2008 2009 2025 Number of trips 2036 2034 1828 2000 Number of trips per ferry 1018 1017 914 Passenger total 312730 303369 262817 Cars total 50897 41627 41293 Busses total 1356 853 624 Trailers total 117655 148278 126391 Railway wagons 26815 17724 8493 Equivalent car units 914102 964522 761298 800000 Mean capacity per ferry 970 970 970 970 Car equivalents per trip 449 474 416 400 Utilization in % 46.3 48.9 42.9 41.2 7

Equivalent car units total 1000000 800000 600000 400000 Trelleborg - Rostock ferry traffic 200000 0 2003 2008 2013 2018 2023 2028 Year Fig. 4 Traffic on Trelleborg - Rostock Based on the above mentioned assumption for traffic in 2025 (2000 trips/year) the emissions have been calculated by using the basic consumption and emission figures in table 5 and the results are shown in table 10. Table 10 Emission figures for 2025 for Trelleborg - Rostock Year 2025 Number of crossing per year 2000 Assumed ferry types on the route 2 Average capacity per ferry per crossing (cars) 970 Total fuel consumption (tons/year) 35000 Total CO 2 emissions (tons/year) 112210 Total NOx emissions (tons/year) 442 Total SO 2 emissions (tons/year) 74 Total HC emissions (tons/year) 92 Total CO emissions (tons/year) 295 Total PM emissions (tons/year) 40 8

Uncertainties of the calculations Prediction of the exhaust gas emissions in the described scenarios are of course associated with some uncertainties. The basic uncertainties are 1) the number of crossings, 2) the emission factors and 3) the oil consumption per trip. The uncertainties regarding the number of crossings will not be dealt with in this report, as this issue is solved by COWI. The uncertainties about emission factors is small with respect to sulphur and associated PM emissions as the coming low sulphur requirements are very probable (The Baltic Sea will most probably be an Emission Control Area in the future, at least in 2025. The NOx levels are more unclear. In the present calculations as they are not based on mandatory requirements but more on realistic assumptions which are impossible to quantify. The oil consumptions per trip for Roedby- Puttgarden and Gedser - Rostock are within plus/minus 10 per cent, while the oil consumption for Trelleborg - Rostock is larger because it is not known with much accuracy which crossing time which will be selected for future operation of the route. To day to sailing times on the route is 6 hours and 7.5 hours. The accuracy of the oil consumption is therefore roughly plus minus 20 per cent. 12th December 2010 Hans Otto Kristensen Hans Otto Kristensen 9