The National Marine Biological Analytical Quality Control Scheme

Similar documents
The National Marine Biological Analytical Quality Control Scheme

To the participants of AQS Baden-Württemberg Dear Madam or Sir,

Table 3.1 New Freshmen SAT Scores By Campus: Fall Table 3.2 UVI New Freshmen SAT Scores By Gender: Fall 1999

The Participant will select one of the two Approval Categories (below) and submit the appropriate documentation.

September 2014 Data Release

April 2014 Data Release

Haoma Mining NL. 7.10g/t, 84 to 86m 6.83g/t, 76 to 100m

2015 AER Survey of Albertans and Stakeholders. Executive Summary

RFP No. P3010 New l.i ght Rail Vehicles

Z-Score Summary - Concrete Proficiency Testing Program (70) Z-SCORES SUMMARY. Concrete April 2017 (70)

URLY OFF-STREET PARKING:

Concrete (63) PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM REPORT

OFFICIAL PROGRAM STANDARDS NOTIFICATION Issued: February 24, 2012

Business Models and Compensation Framework for the Utility Transformation August 16, 2017

GC MERGE OF LIGHT ENDS WITH ASTM D7169 BOILING POINT DISTRIBUTION

76th UNECE GRPE session

Baugh Wind Energy Design Competition Saturday, 9 February 2019

Technical Report. 10 th Round Robin Test for Multi-Capillary Pressure Drop Calibration Standards (2014)

Large General Service Time-of-Use Storage Program

Quality Control in Mineral Exploration

Discussing the Ratepayer Benefits of EVs On the Electrical Grid

Travel Action Plan De Montfort University

Sacramento Municipal Utility District s EV Innovators Pilot

MIL ON WITH DTC P0106 STORED

Memo. Soil & Waste File no. MST Ref. pehem/ jehni/lived 29 September Memo for Dialogue forum

Article: Sulfur Testing VPS Quality Approach By Dr Sunil Kumar Laboratory Manager Fujairah, UAE

review of european oil industry benzene exposure data ( )

GC0096 Storage Grid Code Workgroup. Monday 30 th January 2017

Results... Survey on Mechanical Issues Related to Biodiesel Blending

IMPROVING CITIES THROUGH PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS. Toronto Forum For Global Cities December 2008

Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders. Scoring Manual

Participation of Beacon Power s Flywheel Energy Storage Technology in NYISO s Regulation Service Market

REGULATION No. 117 (Tyres rolling noise and wet grip adhesion) Proposal for amendment to the document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2010/63. Annex 8.

Technical Papers supporting SAP 2009

HARMFUL AQUATIC ORGANISMS IN BALLAST WATER

Station Service Obligations. Technical Panel November 22, 2017

Smart Grid Subcommittee Report

Safe operation of the rotating anode x-ray generator in room 1128 ERB. Emergency power disconnect

2016 Meteorological Summary for the Galeta Marine Island Laboratory. Prepared by: Steven Paton

Hematology Program (BC90A/BC90B/BC90C/BC90D/CS90A/CS90B/CS90C/CS90D) Cycle 11: March 2016 February Sample No: 9 Sample Date: 21 Nov 16

2017 Meteorological Summary for the Galeta Marine Island Laboratory. Prepared by: Steven Paton

NJ Solar Market Update

KEY STAGE. Level threshold tables and age standardised scores for key stage 2 tests in English, mathematics and science KEY STAGE KEY STAGE KEY STAGE

CRL ring trial reference : RT13 (E. coli / Salmonella EQA, 2005/6)

Russian Automobile Dealers

SOUTH ASIA REGIONAL INITIATIVE

IBM SmartGrid Vision and Projects

Determination of Volume Correction Factors for FAME and FAME / Mineral-diesel blends

Results of Proficiency Test Cetane Number of Diesel Fuel October 2010

Voting Draft Standard

TRACE ELEMENTS IN URINE

Continued coordination and facilitation with City of Austin staff on documentation of processes to permit construction activities at the site.

G37, M37, M56, AND QX56; MIL ON WITH DTC P0106 STORED

Results of Proficiency Test Gasoline (ASTM specification) February 2017

Review of Upstate Load Forecast Uncertainty Model

Distributed Energy Resources

European Community Reference laboratory for monitoring bacteriological and viral contamination of bivalve molluscs

GENERAL CHEMISTRY. Sub-disciplines of Chemistry. Course Organization. Course Organization: People. What You Need for Lecture

ASPHALT ROUND 1 PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM. April 2009 REPORT NO. 605 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

8154 Forest Hill Avenue, Suite 3 Richmond, VA Ph: (804)

EMBARGOED UNTIL RELEASE AT 8:30 A.M. EST, THURSDAY, JANUARY 30, 2014 GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT: FOURTH QUARTER AND ANNUAL 2013 (ADVANCE ESTIMATE)

LYCOMING ENGINES

M o n. a t i s t i c s. M o n t h l y NOVEMBER 2009

ASSIGNMENT-1. Table1

Level threshold tables and age standardised scores

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2006-NE-20-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

EMBARGOED UNTIL RELEASE AT 8:30 A.M. EST, FRIDAY, JANUARY 30, 2015 GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT: FOURTH QUARTER AND ANNUAL 2014 (ADVANCE ESTIMATE)

Integration of High Levels of PV in the German Power System

in Major North American Cities

March 5, Information for Decision Making

PVC Casing Cutter - Single Cutting Wheel (SCW) Sizes & , Operators Manual

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2017-NE-27-AD; Amendment 39- Airworthiness Directives; Lycoming Engines Reciprocating Engines

2007 B100 Quality Survey Results

NIH Toolbox Emotion Raw Score to T-Score Conversion Tables September 8, 2017

PREFERRED PUMPER PROGRAM April 17, 2018

Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR) University of South Florida. Updated the MSSP Business Plan after the last coalition meeting.

In order to apply for the ProGuard Program, please follow the below steps:

9/17/2013 OVERVIEW WHAT RICE UNITS ARE IMPACTED? WHAT IS A RICE UNIT? EXAMPLES OF RICE UNITS WHY IS THE EPA REGULATING RICE?

PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION

EMBARGOED UNTIL RELEASE AT 8:30 A.M. EST, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 30, 2013 GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT: FOURTH QUARTER AND ANNUAL 2012 (ADVANCE ESTIMATE)

Pre-normative research on resistance to mechanical impact of composite overwrapped pressure vessels. Dr. Fabien Nony CEA

Toner Cartridge Evaluation Report # Cartridge Type: EY3-OCC5745

Regulation of Vehicles for Hire City Code Chapter 34, Article VI

2019 Formula SAE Japan Local Rules Number 2 Issued: January 30, 2019(First Edition +)

Results of Proficiency Test Gasoline (ASTM specification) March 2016

Russian Automobile Dealers Convention 2017

AIR POLLUTION AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY. Mandatory reporting of attained EEDI values. Submitted by Japan, Norway, ICS, BIMCO, CLIA, IPTA and WSC SUMMARY

TRACE ELEMENTS IN URINE. Event #3, 2012

Part 3 Agreement Programs for 2017 and Greenhouse Gas Reduction (Renewable and Low Carbon Fuel Requirements) Act

Service Bulletin

CDN Resource Laboratories Ltd.

Service Bulletin

AMERICAN CORNHOLE ORGANIZATION PLAYERS GUIDE SEASON XII OFFICIAL GUIDE. AmericanCornhole.com American Cornhole, LLC

Alto Tunnel Study Weekly Progress Report Week Ending March 10, 2017

PRODUCT EMISSION RECALL

Piedmont Community College Roxboro, North Carolina Curriculum

Regulatory update on implementation of the 0.50% sulphur limit for international shipping

Co-location Informal Guidance Note. March 2018 Version 1.1

European biomethane standards for grid injection and vehicle fuel use

Applied Load Testing for WorkoverRigs. Chance Borger Holly Bramer Jacob Wedel

Transcription:

The National Marine Biological Analytical Quality Control Scheme www.nmbaqcs.org Ring Test Bulletin Seagrass OMC RT05 Dr Emma Wells Wells Marine Surveys April 2014 Email: emma@wellsmarine.org 1

RING TEST DETAILS Ring Test Seagrass OMC RT05 Type /Contents - % cover estimations of seagrass Circulated - 4 th February 2014 Completion Date - 4 th March 2014 Number of Subscribing Laboratories - 13 Number of Participating Laboratories - 12 Total Number of Participants - 23 Number of Results Received Per Test - 16 (Test A), 20 (Test B), 11 (Test C) *multiple data entries per lab submitted 2

Test A (Open Quadrat) Table 1. Results for % cover estimations received from participating laboratories for test A. Lab Code MA2103a MA2103b MA2103c MA2103d MA2111 Image analysis results Test A Seagrass coverage % Quadrat 1 63.93 80 51 60 65 60 58 58 60 67 65 60 35 60 60 55 55 Quadrat 2 60.00 80 72 70 75 65 70 75 65 63 70 65 60 65 70 70 65 Quadrat 3 19.48 30 46 30 20 25 22 30 20 17 25 15 15 15 15 15 20 Quadrat 4 18.98 35 42 40 25 20 28 33 15 15 27 15 20 12 15 25 25 Quadrat 5 28.91 45 53 40 25 30 30 43 30 35 42 20 30 25 25 35 35 Quadrat 6 64.36 90 89 90 90 85 85 82 85 90 80 75 85 90 90 90 85 Quadrat 7 41.01 55 61 50 55 45 42 50 40 45 40 25 45 55 45 50 45 Quadrat 8 32.19 40 55 35 40 35 39 35 25 40 30 30 25 28 40 30 35 Quadrat 9 52.87 75 79 70 45 60 62 66 55 75 60 50 60 75 55 70 70 Quadrat 10 48.90 30 55 45 25 35 30 45 30 35 35 20 25 30 30 45 25 Quadrat 11 7.87 10 38 10 5 10 12 18 5 5 10 6 5 5 5 8 7 Quadrat 12 50.37 50 68 60 55 50 48 53 48 40 47 40 40 60 35 50 50 Quadrat 13 36.33 40 54 35 25 35 30 40 30 30 30 20 30 45 25 35 30 Quadrat 14 39.01 75 73 70 60 50 48 60 50 55 55 50 55 55 40 50 60 Quadrat 15 18.53 30 29 20 15 15 17 19 10 10 10 10 10 12 15 10 15 MA2102a MA2102b MA2102c MA2102d MA2102e MA2112c MA2119 MA2131a MA2133 MA2134a MA2134b 3

Figure 1. Difference in % cover between submitted results and image analysis results, displayed as the average difference across all quadrats in test A for each participant. 4

Figure 2. Number of quadrat fails per participant based on z-scores derived from mean % cover estimates for test A. Figure 3. Number of quadrat fails per participant based on z-scores derived from % cover as calculated using image analysis for test A. 5

Test B (9 x 9 Gridded Quadrat) Table 2. Results for % cover estimations received from participating laboratories for test B. Lab Code Image analysis results MA2117e MA2117d MA2117c MA2103a MA2103b MA2103c MA2103d Test B Seagrass coverage % Quadrat 1 63.93 65 65 54 75 74.1 77.8 72 64 60 68 59 84 71.6 68 64 60 64 52 76 54 Quadrat 2 60.00 80 75 64 83 81.5 86.4 83 80 63 74 61 90 77.7 73 74 64 70 60 83 64 Quadrat 3 19.48 25 25 27 43 39.5 48.1 33 33 21 22 20 48 30.9 25 20 14 30 15 37 22 Quadrat 4 18.98 25 25 28 32 38.3 58 32 37 19 20 22 33 30.9 28 18 14 40 12 59 36 Quadrat 5 28.91 35 40 42 48 60.5 63 40 49 35 43 25 42 33.3 47 28 36 51 30 56 40 Quadrat 6 64.36 90 80 78 86 92.6 91.4 87 89 80 74 75 95 81.5 85 88 89 93.5 90 88 88 Quadrat 7 41.01 45 55 51 60 70.4 75.3 64 54 42 38 32 80 67.9 60 48 38 61 28 65 48 Quadrat 8 32.19 45 45 30 41 43.2 55.6 37 37 25 28 23 36 34.6 38 32 23 39 36 43 36 Quadrat 9 52.87 70 70 64 78 71.6 86.4 63 67 54 58 40 93 53.1 74 60 53 79 45 76 64 Quadrat 10 48.90 40 35 46 58 63 66.7 38 48 33 37 26 63 44.4 49 32 31 44 35 60 34 Quadrat 11 7.87 10 10 17 33 32.1 39.5 6 22 7 9 9 17 14.8 16 4 7 12 4 20 8 Quadrat 12 50.37 55 55 53 64 66.7 65.4 58 59 44 51 45 72 50.6 56 48 51 81 40 56 52 Quadrat 13 36.33 35 40 46 49 53.1 58 36 44 27 30 25 59 40.7 35 28 27 40 20 48 34 Quadrat 14 39.01 60 65 64 75 77.8 81.5 60 63 52 59 52 80 50.6 54 52 54 78 45 70 58 Quadrat 15 18.53 15 20 21 26 23.5 35.8 14 21 10 7 19 11 13.6 17 10 9 75 10 23 16 MA2102b MA2102c MA2102e MA2112c MA2109a MA2109b MA2109c MA2110 MA2119 MA2131a MA2133 MA2134a MA2134b 6

Figure 4. Difference in % cover between submitted results and image analysis results, displayed as the average difference across all quadrats in test B for each participant. 7

Figure 5. Number of quadrat fails per participant based on z-scores derived from mean % cover estimates for test B. Figure 6. Number of quadrat fails per participant based on z-scores derived from % cover as calculated using image analysis for test B. 8

Test C (4 x 4 Gridded Quadrat) Table 3. Results for % cover estimations received from participating laboratories for test C. Lab Codes MA2103a MA2103b MA2103c MA2103d MA2111 MA2112c MA2119 MA2131a MA2133 MA2134a MA2134b Image analysis results Test C Seagrass coverage % Quadrat 1 63.93 60 72 66 60 72 73 47 60 45 45 55 Quadrat 2 60.00 62 81 70 65 85 74 52 66 56 56 75 Quadrat 3 19.48 31 33 36 25 35 30 16 38 15 18 24 Quadrat 4 18.98 27 39 38 28 41 33 12 34 9 22 30 Quadrat 5 28.91 37 54 42 26 51 48 21 52 23 27 33 Quadrat 6 64.36 80 88 78 90 94 90 66 92 90 81 90 Quadrat 7 41.01 48 65 58 50 63 60 39 64 36 36 53 Quadrat 8 32.19 34 41 38 34 48 36 24 40 34 24 35 Quadrat 9 52.87 58 70 64 50 62 64 46 74 40 47 74 Quadrat 10 48.90 43 52 50 30 51 37 29 54 30 34 45 Quadrat 11 7.87 12 25 20 6 15 17 5 22 4 11 17 Quadrat 12 50.37 54 61 58 46 63 54 40 66 42 42 55 Quadrat 13 36.33 35 44 42 28 43 44 22 46 19 24 37 Quadrat 14 39.01 57 59 60 52 67 62 43 72 42 49 68 Quadrat 15 18.53 18 29 24 16 15 12 9 30 11 16 14 9

Figure 7. Difference in % cover between submitted results and image analysis results, displayed as the average difference across all quadrats in test C for each participant. 10

Figure 8. Number of quadrat fails per participant based on z-scores derived from mean % cover estimates for test C. Figure 9. Number of quadrat fails per participant based on z-scores derived from % cover as calculated using image analysis for test C. 11

Table 4. Summary of results from tests A, B and C including minimum values recorded, maximum, mean and range per quadrat across all participants Results from Test A Results from Test B Results from Test C Average deviation mean from actual StDev Range Min Max Mean Avergae deviation mean from actual StDev Range Min Max Mean Average deviation mean from actual StDev Range image analysis seagrass coverage % Min Max Mean Quadrat 1 54.51 35 80 59 4.6 9.1 45 54 78 67 2.8 7.5 24 45 73 60 4.4 10.6 28 Quadrat 2 31.09 60 80 69 8.7 5.2 20 61 86 76 15.5 9.0 25 52 85 67 7.5 10.7 33 Quadrat 3 28.82 15 46 23 3.0 8.4 31 20 48 31 11.2 9.6 28 15 38 27 7.9 8.3 23 Quadrat 4 75.39 12 42 25 5.5 9.3 30 19 58 31 11.6 11.2 39 9 41 28 9.5 10.5 32 Quadrat 5 8.12 20 53 34 5.0 8.8 33 25 63 44 14.8 11.1 38 21 54 38 8.7 12.4 33 Quadrat 6 18.90 75 90 86 22.0 4.5 15 74 93 84 19.6 6.7 19 66 94 85 21.0 8.3 28 Quadrat 7 83.22 25 61 47 5.7 8.3 36 32 75 53 12.4 13.5 43 36 65 52 11.0 11.2 29 Quadrat 8 28.66 25 55 35 2.9 7.5 30 23 56 37 5.0 10.0 33 24 48 35 3.1 7.0 24 Quadrat 9 58.31 45 79 64 11.3 9.9 34 40 86 66 12.7 12.3 46 40 74 59 6.2 11.8 34 Quadrat 10 48.92 20 55 34 15.1 9.4 35 26 67 45 4.3 13.1 41 29 54 41 7.5 9.7 25 Quadrat 11 8.27 5 38 10 2.1 8.3 33 6 40 18 9.9 12.1 34 4 25 14 6.2 7.1 21 Quadrat 12 39.51 35 68 50 0.7 8.6 33 44 67 56 5.7 7.7 23 40 66 53 2.5 9.1 26 Quadrat 13 43.41 20 54 33 3.0 8.3 34 25 58 40 4.0 10.8 33 19 46 35 1.4 10.0 27 Quadrat 14 5.37 40 75 57 17.6 9.5 35 52 81 65 25.5 9.8 29 42 72 57 18.3 10.0 30 Quadrat 15 32.99 10 30 15 3.1 6.4 20 7 36 19 0.8 7.9 29 9 30 18 0.9 7.0 21 Average 7.37 8.11 30.93 Average 10.39 10.15 32.22 Average 7.7 9.6 27.6 12

Table 5. Comparison of estimated results from tests A, B and C with image analysis % cover results. The value represents the average deviation from image analysis % cover value for each participant. Lab Code Test A Test B Test C MA2117e 9.32 MA2117d 10.00 MA2117c 8.82 MA2103a 14.72 18.02 6.44 MA2103b 20.54 20.33 15.35 MA2103c 10.71 27.08 10.75 MA2103d 9.94 11.70 7.65 MA2111 5.56 15.29 MA2102a 7.23 MA2102b 9.59 12.53 MA2102c 6.37 6.23 MA2102d 9.08 MA2102e 7.60 7.28 MA2112c 9.00 7.29 12.61 MA2109a 22.39 MA2109b 8.82 MA2109c 9.87 MA2110 7.16 MA2119 9.50 7.71 8.20 MA2131a 10.19 18.97 15.67 MA2133 7.92 8.92 9.84 MA2134a 7.65 18.48 7.75 MA2134b 8.47 8.71 10.47 13

Figure 10. Comparison of deviation in image analysis % cover from estimated % cover between quadrats highlighting those problematic quadrats. (Quadrats are arranged in order of lowest to highest % cover). 14

Image Analysis Results Areas of seagrass coverage as calculated using imagej analysis. Summary results for each quadrat include the total number of failures across all three tests as calculated using Z-scores based on both the mean % cover across all participants and the actual % cover as determined by image analysis. Quadrat: 1 Actual % cover: 69.93 Total No. of fails from Z-score of mean: 3 Total No. of fails from Z-score of actual % cover: 2 Average deviation across 3 tests: 7.84 Quadrat: 2 Actual % cover: 60.00 Total No. of fails from Z-score of mean: 1 Total No. of fails from Z-score of actual % cover: 13 Average deviation from mean: 11.15 15

Quadrat: 3 Actual % cover: 19.48 Total No. of fails from Z-score of mean: 1 Total No. of fails from Z-score of actual % cover: 6 Average deviation from mean: 8.73 Quadrat: 4 Actual % cover: 18.98 Total No. of fails from Z-score of mean: 2 Total No. of fails from Z-score of actual % cover: 4 Average deviation from mean: 11.22 16

Quadrat: 5 Actual % cover: 28.91 Total No. of fails from Z-score of mean: 2 Total No. of fails from Z-score of actual % cover: 5 Average deviation from mean: 11.17 Quadrat: 6 Actual % cover: 64.36 Total No. of fails from Z-score of mean: 2 Total No. of fails from Z-score of actual % cover: 42 Average deviation from mean: 21.56 17

Quadrat: 7 Actual % cover: 41.01 Total No. of fails from Z-score of mean: 1 Total No. of fails from Z-score of actual % cover: 6 Average deviation from mean: 12.40 Quadrat: 8 Actual % cover: 32.19 Total No. of fails from Z-score of mean: 2 Total No. of fails from Z-score of actual % cover: 3 Average deviation from mean: 6.50 18

Quadrat: 9 Actual % cover: 52.87 Total No. of fails from Z-score of mean: 1 Total No. of fails from Z-score of actual % cover: 6 Average deviation from mean: 13.04 Quadrat: 10 Actual % cover: 48.90 Total No. of fails from Z-score of mean: 1 Total No. of fails from Z-score of actual % cover: 10 Average deviation from mean: 12.29 19

Quadrat: 11 Actual % cover: 7.87 Total No. of fails from Z-score of mean: 2 Total No. of fails from Z-score of actual % cover: 5 Average deviation from mean: 6.82 Quadrat: 12 Actual % cover: 50.37 Total No. of fails from Z-score of mean: 2 Total No. of fails from Z-score of actual % cover: 3 Average deviation from mean: 7.56 20

Quadrat: 13 Actual % cover: 36.33 Total No. of fails from Z-score of mean: 1 Total No. of fails from Z-score of actual % cover: 2 Average deviation from mean: 8.21 Quadrat: 14 Actual % cover: 39.01 Total No. of fails from Z-score of mean: 0 Total No. of fails from Z-score of actual % cover: 22 Average deviation from mean: 19.83 21

Quadrat: 15 Actual % cover: 18.53 Total No. of fails from Z-score of mean: 3 Total No. of fails from Z-score of actual % cover: 1 Average deviation from mean: 6.78 22