Environmental Ship Index (ESI)

Similar documents
International Association of Ports and Harbors GREENING THE MARITIME INDUSTRY. World Ports Climate Initiative

Environmental Ship Index (ESI) Fundamentals 2017

Trade Logistics and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

AMBER M. KLESGES BOARD SECRETARY. No.\w-Tm

LNG: Legal and regulatory framework. Canepa Monica World Maritime University

Market instruments for sustainable shipping Eelco Leemans Environmental ship indexes: a tool to reduce pollution in ports? Eelco Leemans North Sea

Monitoring, reporting and verification of CO 2 emissions from ships - EU MRV regulation and obligations and the parallel IMO activities

Challenges for sustainable freight transport Maritime transport. Elena Seco Gª Valdecasas Director Spanish Shipowners Association - ANAVE

An update on MTCC Caribbean s Pilot Projects: Preliminary Results of Data Collection Stephan Nanan

Consistent implementation of the 2020 sulphur limit and work to further address GHG emissions from international shipping

Guidelines for PSCOs on the Inspection Campaign on MARPOL ANNEX VI

Transport Canada Marine Safety Emission Control Area North America

"Exhaust Gas Scrubbers Abatement System as an Alternative under IMO MARPOL Annex VI''

Challenges in the implementation of MRV regulation. Yiannis Kokarakis Bureau Veritas

To: IAMU International Executive Board From: Capt Walter Nadolny, Asst Professor, SUNY Maritime College

CIRCULAR IMO FAQ on the sulphur limits in Emission Control Areas (ECAs)

AIR POLLUTION AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY. Guidelines for onboard sampling and the verification of the sulphur content of the fuel oil used on board ships

DIFFERENTIATED PORT DUES AND EPI

ECA enforcement & lessons for future action

GASEOUS FUELS SAFETY ASPECTS

Shipping Guidance Notice 069. EU Monitoring, Reporting and Verification (MRV) regulations and IMO Data Collection Data Collection System (DCS)

Recent and current developments in the regulation of air pollution from ships

MARPOL Annex VI Emission Control Areas. CDR Ryan Allain U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Standards Division Washington, D.C.

NORTH AMERICAN ECA AND NEW FUEL SULFUR CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

Maritime Transport and the Climate Change Challenge

Exhaust Gas Cleaning System Guidelines An Update May 2017

IMO. REVIEW OF MARPOL ANNEX VI AND THE NO x TECHNICAL CODE. Proposal to harmonize a record book of engine parameters

Monitoring Air Emissions on Ships. Restricted Siemens AG 2014 All rights reserved.

Maritime emissions IMO discussions

ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES

IMO fuel oil consumption data collection system

Will the Pearl Shine Again?

By Edmund Hughes, Technical Officer, Marine Environment Division, IMO

Sustainable Development IMO s Contribution Beyond Rio+20

Regulatory update on implementation of the 0.50% sulphur limit for international shipping

Pollution by the Shipping Industry: Current Vessels and the Next Generation of Ships

Pollution & GHG emissions from ships. Development of market-based. Marine Environment Division - IMO

FURTHER TECHNICAL AND OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR ENHANCING ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING

Council of the European Union Brussels, 26 September 2016 (OR. en)

China Regulatory Update

Technical Information

MARPOL Annex VI prevention of air pollution from ships

INTERNATIONAL AIR POLLUTION PREVENTION CERTIFICATE. GOVERNMENTOFmELAND

Notice of the Maritime Safety Administration of the People s. Republic of China on Strengthening the Supervision and

ANNEX 3. RESOLUTION MEPC.278(70) (Adopted on 28 October 2016)

METHANOL AS A MARINE FUEL A SAFE, COST EFFECTIVE, CLEAN-BURNING, WIDELY AVAILABLE MARINE FUEL FOR TODAY AND THE FUTURE

RESOLUTION MEPC.278(70) (Adopted on 28 October 2016) AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNEX OF THE PROTOCOL OF 1997 TO AMEND THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE

Preliminary Report of MEPC 71

Fuel oil availability review for international shipping

RESOLUTION MEPC.181(59) Adopted on 17 July GUIDELINES FOR PORT STATE CONTROL UNDER THE REVISED MARPOL ANNEX VI

TECHNICAL ALERT No Rev.01

INDUSTRY'S PERSPECTIVE ON THE COMPLIANCE WITH THE LOW SULPHUR REQUIREMENTS. Pulp and paper industries' views and assessment

European Regulation MRV. Luis Guerrero 2 nd November 2015

Official Journal of the European Union

GREENER SHIPPING SUMMIT 2017

Ship Energy Efficiency and Air Pollution. Ernestos Tzannatos Department of Maritime Studies University of Piraeus

ECA Compliance & PM. Thomas Kirk Director of Environmental Programs. Ottawa, Canada 9 September 2014

Monitoring, Reporting and Reducing Air Emissions from Marine Operations. Till Stoeckenius, ENVIRON Int. Corp. GreenTech June St.

Regional Workshop on MARPOL Annex VI: Ship Energy Efficiency and Technology Transfer NOTE

Preliminary Report of MEPC 70

Comparative analysis of ship efficiency metrics

Marine Environmental Protection Committee IMO MEPC 62 July 2011

GUIDELINES FOR PORT STATE CONTROL UNDER MARPOL ANNEX VI

- 1 - Agenda item 10(e) Emissions from fuel used for international aviation and maritime transport

POLLUTION PREVENTION AND RESPONSE. Application of more than one engine operational profile ("multi-map") under the NOx Technical Code 2008

NO x FAQ. Disclaimer. Content

Outlook for Marine Bunkers and Fuel Oil to A key to understanding the future of marine bunkers and fuel oil markets

SIHARBOR: The shore connection system for berthed ships

SIHARBOR: The shore connection system for berthed ships Shore-side power supply for eco-friendly ports

GHG EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS UPDATE ON IMO EU MRV REGULATION

Regulatory Update what s hot?

Marine Spatial Planning: Proactive Efforts for a Sustainable Future

AIR POLLUTION AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY. Mandatory reporting of attained EEDI values. Submitted by Japan, Norway, ICS, BIMCO, CLIA, IPTA and WSC SUMMARY

APPLICATION OF MARPOL 73/78 ANNEX VI TO EXISTING SHIPS

Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI)

MINUTES. OF THE 1st MEETING TYPE-APPROVAL AUTHORITIES EXPERT GROUP - TAAEG * * *

Readily Achievable EEDI Requirements for 2020

The Voice of International Merchant Shipping

International Maritime Organisation: upcoming decisions ppoev Mr. Loukas Kontogiannis

AIR POLLUTION AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY. EEDI reduction beyond phase 2. Submitted by Liberia, ICS, BIMCO, INTERFERRY, INTERTANKO, CLIA and IPTA SUMMARY

AIR POLLUTION AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY. Update on the proposal for "A transparent and reliable hull and propeller performance standard"

Lean and clean dredging for a better future

To: Owners, Technical Managers, Deputy Registrars, Fleet Managers, Surveyors, Recognised Organisations

RESOLUTION MEPC.291(71) (adopted on 7 July 2017) 2017 GUIDELINES ADDRESSING ADDITIONAL ASPECTS OF THE NOX TECHNICAL CODE 2008 WITH REGARD TO

Maritime policies and regulations IMO s work for sustainable shipping. Green Marine - Greentech May to 1 June 2017

EEDI. SOx PM2.5. The importance of enforcement. Partnerskab for grøn Skibsfart

RESOLUTION MEPC.198(62) Adopted on 15 July GUIDELINES ADDRESSING ADDITIONAL ASPECTS TO THE NOx TECHNICAL CODE 2008 WITH REGARD TO

Blue ocean green future

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Technical Publication. Guidelines for the development of ship's Data Collection Plan (SEEMP Part II) /

IEA Bioenergy ExCo78 workshop Biofuel supply to Interislander

Baltic Sea Parliamentary Conference. MARPOL Annex VI TECHNOLOGY & COMPLIANCE. Ramona Zettelmaier Lloyd s Register

Emissions Reduction in the Shipping Industry. Jean-Florent Helfre, Client Relations Associate

AMENDMENTS TO BUNKER DELIVERY NOTE TO PERMIT THE SUPPLY OF FUEL OIL NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION 14 OF MARPOL ANNEX VI

GUIDANCE ON THE SUPPLEMENT TO THE IAPP CERTIFICATE

RESOLUTION MEPC.251(66) Adopted on 4 April 2014

RESOLUTION MEPC.194(61) Adopted on 1 October 2010 AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNEX OF THE PROTOCOL OF 1997 TO AMEND THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE

Technical Information

Technical Information

Cost-effective ship NOx control

Transcription:

Environmental Ship Index (ESI) AN INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE A SHIPS AIR EMISSION PERFORMANCE With regard to air emissions some ships have a better environmental performance than others. Ports want to be able to make the difference., June 2010

1. INTRODUCTION Climate change is very likely due to increased greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere. Transport through ports and port operations are a source of greenhouse gas emissions and therefore contribute to this. Furthermore, strickter air quality standards and concern for nearby residents prompt port authorities to take additional measures to improve the air quality in their ports. Fifty-five of the world s key ports have committed themselves reducing their greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) while continuing their role as transportation and economic centres. This commitment is called the World Port Climate Initiative (WPCI, www.wpci.nl). One of the missions of WPCI is to initiate actions to reduce GHG emissions and improve air quality in the shipping sector. One of the projects within WPCI is the development of an (ESI). The ESI identifies seagoing ships that go beyond the current standards in reducing air emissions. Up to now, it was not possible to identify these ships in a general way. The index is intended to be used by ports to promote clean ships, but can also be used by shippers and ship owners as a promotional instrument. Finally all stakeholders in maritime transport can use the ESI as a means to improve their environmental performance and as an instrument to reach their sustainability goals. The advantages for all potential users are depicted in Figure 1. THE MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ESI It is a voluntary system, helping to improve the environmental performance of maritime shipping. ESI is an instrument to distinguish ships in their environmental performance regarding air pollutants and CO2. The ESI gives points for the performance of ships compared to the current international legislation (mainly IMO). ESI only takes the NOx and SOx emissions directly into account and awards documentation and management of the energy efficiency. PM10 is indirectly included because of its strong relationship to SOx. ESI can be applied to all types of ships. ESI is simple in its approach and presentation. ESI is easy to establish and to obtain for every ship. In 2010 the ESI will be introduced and from then its ship database, administrated by IAPH will be filled. It is expected that as from 2011 the ESI will be used by ports to promote clean shipping. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL SHIP INDEX (ESI) The ESI should ideally reflect all relevant emissions to the air that are important from an environmental and health point of view, including CO2, NOx, PM10 and SOx. At the same time, the ESI should be undisputable and based on current indi- For shippers: + Positive consumer experience + Way to implement sustainable goals REQUIREMENTS & CARGO TO SAIL POSITIVE CONSUMER EXPERIENCE For carriers: PROMOTIONAL SCHEME CLEANER SHIPS For ports / terminals: + Cleaner air + Increased stakeholder acceptance Figure 1 Benefits of the use of ESI

cators, broadly supported by IMO and available certificates. Research by the Dutch consultancy CE Delft has shown that CO2 and PM10 can not directly be incorporated into the ESI from the start, because there is no reliable certified data available for most of the ships. Energy efficiency indexing has been put on the agenda by IMO recently, but no indicator is available at the moment. PM10 emissions from maritime engines are not certified by IMO yet. Therefore, no certified data is available about the actual PM10 emissions of maritime engines. Including PM10 emissions would be difficult and costly at the moment. Taken the availability of useful indicators and IMO engine certificates into account, an index can currently be based on engine NOx emission and the sulphur content of the different fuels used. With respect to climate emissions, the IMO has put forward guidelines for the voluntary use of an Energy Efficiency Operational Indicator (EEOI) 1 and the Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) 2. Both aim for an improvement of the energy efficiency of sea going ships. The ESI will give points for the use of one of both guidelines by operators. 3. ESI FORMULAS The overall ESI formula is built up of different parts for NOx, SOx and CO2. The weight of the ESI_NOx in the overall index is twice the weight of ESI_SOx. This reflects the fact that the average environmental damage from NOx 3 in ship air emissions is approximately twice the damage from SOx. The overall ESI ranges from 0 for a ship that meets the environmental performance regulations in force to 100 for a ship that emits no SOx and NOx and reports or monitors its energy efficiency. By comparing the actual performance of a ship with a baseline set, the ESI points can be defined. The baselines are based on the IMO regulations in force, apart from fuels used at berth, where local EU regulation is used. The index gives a relatively higher weight on emissions at berth and in the ECA, as these have a larger environmental and health impact in and near the ports. The formula for the index is: Where: ESI_NOx is the environmental ship index for NOx. ESI_SOxis the environmental ship index for SOx. RR_CO2 is the reward for reporting on ship energy efficiency based on the EEOI or a SEEMP. The ESI_NOx and ESI_SOx both range from 0 to 100. The weight of the ESI_NOx in the overall index is twice the weight of ESI_SOx. This reflects the fact that the average environmental damage from NOx in ship air emissions is approximately twice the damage from SOx. For energy efficiency reporting (RR_CO2) the additional score is 10 points. The total amount of points to be scored is 310. ESI_NOx The ESI_NOx indicates the reductions of NOx emissions per unit of power below IMO limit values. It covers all engines and weighs them according to rated power. ESI_NOx is defined as: Where: Pi is the rated power of engine i. NOxratingi is the certificated NOx emissions of engine i in g/kwh. NOx_limit_valuei is the maximum allowable NOx emissions for an engine with the speed of engine i. n number of engines. ESI_NOx can be unequivocally calculated using the EIAPP certificates of the engines on board a ship. Ships that do not have an EIAPP onboard can not obtain points for ESI_NOx. ESI_SOx The ESI_SOx reflects the reduction in sulphur content of the fuels below the limit values set by IMO and regional authorities. Three types of fuel are distinguished: fuels typically used at high seas, fuels typically used in ECAs and fuels typically used at berth. The baselines are based upon IMO limit values and will be tightened in accordance with IMO limits. ESI SOx gives higher weighting to the fuels used in ECAs and at berth, due to its greater impact on the ports and its surrounding areas. 1 MEPC.1/Circ.684, 2 MEPC.1/Circ.683 3 NOxO emissions are roughly twice the SOxO x emissions per unit of work, with damage costs being in the same range.

ESI_SOx is defined as: Where: a = the relative reduction of the average sulphur content of fuel used on the high seas. b = the relative reduction of the average sulphur content of fuel used in the ECA S. c = the relative reduction of the average sulphur content of fuel used at berth. ESI_SOx can be established after inspection of the bunker fuel delivery notes of a ship over the past year. RR_CO2 CO2 emissions are not reflected in the index directly. However, the ESI gives points to ships that report on energy efficiency with 10 points. The ESI can either be used as a whole, or the different parts for NOx, SOx and CO2 can be used separately. 4. IMO ANNEX VI REGULATIONS AND ESI BASELINES Sulphur In the next years the lowered limits for fuel sulphur content from the revised Annex VI to the MARPOL Convention will come into effect, as indicated in Table 1. Table 1 Date 2005 2010, July 2012 2015 2020 a MARPOL Annex VI Sulphur Limit in Fuel Sulphur Limit in Fuel (%m/m) High sea 4.5% 3.5% 0.5% SOx ECA 1.5% 1.0% 0.1% a - alternative date is 2025, to be decided by a review in 2018 The baselines of ESI are in line with the above presented IMO sulphur limits. This implies that at the date the IMO fuel sulphur limits will be tightened, the ESI baseline will be adjusted as well. The EU Marine Fuel Sulphur Directive (2005/33/EC), that enforces the use of 0.1%S fuel as from 1 st January 2010, will be used as a baseline from that date on. Table 2 Date 2009 2010 Set of SOx baselines Sulphur Limit in Fuel (%m/m) High sea SOx ECA Berth 1.5% 1.5% 4.5% 2010, July 2012 2015 2020 3.5% 0.5% 1.0% 0.1% 0.1% Nitrogen oxides MARPOL Annex VI also limits the NOx emissions of future marine engines. Figure 2 depicts the emission limits for current and future Tiers. The limit value depends on the rated engine speed above 130 rpm.

Figure 2 IMO Annex VI NOx emission Limits (g/kwh) The baseline for defining the ESI_NOx score is Tier 1. In the future, the baseline may be sharpened to Tier I I Abatement technologies: The NOx and SOx input for the ESI can be adjusted for IMO approved abatement technologies (like scrubbers and Selective Catalist Reduction) in accordance with the emitted equivalant SOx and NOx emissions. 5. DATA NEEDED FOR ESI CERTIFICATION To calculate the ESI points of a ship, the information needed is summarized in Table 3. Table 3 Data needed for ESI calculation ESI NOx ESI SOx RR_CO2 Document EIAPP certificate Bunker delivery notes over 1 year EEOI reporting or ship energy efficiency management plan Data needed Rated power (kw) and rated engine speed (rpm) main engine Rated power (kw) and rated speed (rpm) auxiliary engines Average fuel sulphur content per bunkering per kind of fuel (%) Amount of fuel, per kind of fuel, bunkered per delivery (ton) Submission of EEOI reporting or ship energy efficiency management plan Actual Nox emission value (g/kwh) To calculate the ESI NOx, the IMO limit value for a particular engine needs to be compared with the engine s actual certified value. This information is documented in the engine International Air Pollution Prevention (EIAPP) certificate. This certificate has been issued since 2000 for all engines that meet the IMO Tier I standard. Ships that do not have these certificates available can not apply for ESI_NOx.

6. EXPERIENCES WITH ESI CALCULATION The WPCI working group developed a questionnaire that was distributed under ships by different ports in a field test. The data presented in Table 3 was gathered from a sample of 50 ships and on that basis the ESI points for the ships were calculated. On the basis of the current baselines and the formulas ESI points were calculated. The field test has shown that: The approach chosen is feasible and the data are available onboard of ships. The time needed to gather the data and calculate ESI points is limited to 2-4 hours per ship once a year. The environmental performance and hence ESI points of ships show significant difference. On average, Tier I main engines emit on average 80% of the permitted emissions. Auxiliary engines emit on average 90% of the permitted level. However the range was between 60 and 100% of the Tier I standard. Figure 3 Overall ESI points (max. 100) The difference in sulphur contents varies significantly on the high sea, reflecting the difference in fuel sulphur contents in different parts of the world. Also at berth, the sulphur contents vary due to the use of both gasoil and heavy fuel oil at the moment. As from 2010, the differences will be limited. In the ECAs, the sulphur content of most fuels are close to the 1.5% S limit. In Figure 3, the ESI points for a sample of ships are depicted on the basis of baselines for 2009. For more information see CE, 2009b. As can be seen from Figure 3 the difference between ships is relatively big, reflecting the difference in NOx emissions of the engines and fuel sulphur contents of the fuels used. Note: On the y-axis the identification numbers of the questionnaires are listed. Energy efficiency reporting was not included in the questionnaire, and is therefore not included in these points. ship id. 10 24 17 14 31 35 29 42 41 40 36 34 15 28 45 20 18 46 39 30 24 1 33 6 19 32 8 11 3 44 12 25 22 16 48 43 9 7 5 37 38 26 21 47 27 23 13 7. ESI CALCULATION EXAMPLE Below, we provide an example of ESI calculation for a specific ship. The ship in the example has one main engine and three auxiliary engines. The ship uses all three types of fuel. The calculations are based on baselines that apply after July 2010. The formulas and baselines are depicted in section 3 and 4. Sulphur The average sulphur content of the different fuels is extracted from the bunker delivery notes. The average for the respective fuels is the weighted average over all bunkers. The use of fuels that are under the respective baselines is the only criterion for ESI points. This implies that whenever a ship can demonstrate the use of a certain fuel, it will be settled against this. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 overall ESI points (max. 100) overall NOx points overall SOx points

High sea ECA Berth Baseline sulphur 4.5% 1.0% 0.1% Actual sulphur 2.0% 0.5% 0.08% For the different regions, the relative improvement compared to the baselines is awarded, as presented in section 3 and 4: Nitrogen oxides Baseline Tier I Main engine Auxiliary engines Allowed emission level (IMO Annex VI) 17 g/kwh Allowed emission level (IMO Annex VI) 11.5 g/kwh Actual emission level 15 g/kwh Actual emission level 11 g/kwh Power 9.480 kw Power 970 kw Number 3 Overall ESI For this example the overall ESI points are as follows: EEOI reporting or ship energy management plan The ship has an energy management plan. This generates 10 additional points. 8. ADMINISTRATION AND VERIFICATION Administration The administration of ESI is carried out by the ESI bureau that is part of IAPH. Activities of the ESI bureau Confirming receipt of self declarations (SDs) of ships regarding their ESI index. Cross checking application of formulas and data used in the ESI self declaration (SD) and verify appropriate consequent issuance of index points. A web based tool shall automatically establish the ESI points. The number of points is inextricably connected to a particular ship and will remain available for such ship. Informing the applicant owner/ship of the results of the cross check and issuance of a certificate. Showing the total points Making available on the user s (ports, terminals, shippers) non-public section of the ESI website ships data such as: - Name. - IMO identification number.

- Owner/operator/manager. - Verified number of ESI Points (including distribution over the parameters). - Period of validity of such points. - Number of years in the system. Making available on the public section of the website, a description of the system in a general form, the names of the ships that have submitted a SD and providing such data on the incentives systems as has been authorized by the organizations that provide such incentives. Rules & Conditions The self declaration (SD) should contain at least a statement to the effect that the owner/operator/manager of a ship, in submitting the self declaration to the ESI bureau, agrees to the conditions for including the ships details regarding ESI in the ESI Bureaus database and the consequent dissemination of such data at the request of and to such ports that are participating in the ESI system, as laid down in the ESI Rules and Conditions as published on the ESI website. The data of the SD should be provided on an annual basis in an electronic form and the documents pertaining thereto should be kept on board the vessel for a period of at least two years. The ship may be subject to an inspection on the correctness of the self declaration and the data used in the ESI formulas by any incentive provider that includes that ships in its participation in the scheme, at the sole discretion of that provider. The results of such inspection should be transmitted to the ESI administration to be available for the users. An incentive provider is considered to be participating in the ESI scheme if it has informed the Board of ESI of its intentions, based on the ESI points as laid down by the ESI administration. If no such information has been received the data base system cannot be accessed. 9. MORE INFORMATION & SUGGESTIONS OR COMMENTS IAPH, 2010 Fer van de Laar, info@iaph.nl Information can be found on: www.wpci.nl CE, 2009b Eelco den Boer field test - On the basis of a voluntary survey (not published yet) Delft : CE Delft, 2009 GLOSSARY ECA = Emission Control Area IMO = International Maritime Organization PM10 = Particulate Matter < 10 μm EEOI = Energy Efficiency Operational Indicator SEEMP = Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan EIAPP = Engine International Air Pollution Prevention Finance Payment of a contribution to the ESI administration for costs connected with the entry into the system is now being discussed. If it would be so decided it is envisaged that the amount would not exceed 400,00 per ship (incl. VAT) which woud be payable before entering data for any ship into the ESI database. Such a fee would be valid for a period of 5 years and cannot be reimbursed and would include regular updates where applicable.