GT-SUITE USERS CONFERENCE FRANKFURT, OCTOBER 20 TH 2003 FLUID DYNAMICS TRANSIENT RESPONSE SIMULATION OF A VEHICLE EQUIPPED WITH A TURBOCHARGED DIESEL ENGINE USING GT-POWER TEAM OF WORK: A. GALLONE, C. VENEZIA FIAT RESEARCH CENTRE ENGINE ENGINEERING DIVISION FLUIDS AND COMBUSTION ANALYSIS DEPARTMENT
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION GT-POWER MODEL DESCRIPTION STEADY STATE ANALYSIS FULL LOAD CURVE TRANSIENT ANALYSIS TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: RESULTS WITH 2 ND, 3 RD, 4 TH AND 5 TH GEARS TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: PARAMETRIC EVALUATIONS REMARKS AND CONCLUSIONS 2
INTRODUCTION THE IMPROVEMENT OF PASSENGER CARS EQUIPPED WITH TURBOCHARGED DIESEL ENGINES HAS ASKED FOR A BETTER UNDERSTANDING AND OPTIMISATION OF THE FLUID DYNAMICS PHENOMENA INVOLVED IN TURBO CHARGING. AS WELL KNOWN, AN IMPORTANT EFFECT ON SUCH VEHICLE PERFORMANCE DURING ACCELERATION PHASES IS DUE TO THE SO-CALLED TURBOLAG, THE ENGINE DELAY TO A DRIVER S REQUEST OF TORQUE. USING THE 1D GT-POWER CODE VARIOUS TRANSIENT PHASES HAVE BEEN SIMULATED FOR AN ALFA ROMEO 147 VEHICLE WITH 1.9 JTD ENGINE WITH A VGT TURBOCHARGER, DURING ACCELERATIONS FROM 1000 ERPM TO 4500 ERPM WITH 2 ND, 3 RD, 4 TH GEARS. AND 5 TH THE CONTROL OF THE VARIABLE GEOMETRY TURBINE HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTED IN THE MODEL USING GT-POWER CONTROL OBJECTS ONLY, IN ORDER TO KEEP THE SET-UP AS EASY AS POSSIBLE. THE IMPLEMENTED CONTROL REPRODUCES THE REAL ECU STRATEGY. 3
INTRODUCTION THE SIMULATION RESULTS, IN TERMS OF ENGINE TORQUE, VEHICLE SPEED, ETC, HAVE BEEN COMPARED WITH VEHICLE EXPERIMENTAL DATA, PROVIDED BY FGP ITALY, AND THE AGREEMENT IS SATISFACTORY. AS RESULT, THE ACTIVITY HAS SHOWN THE KEY ROLE PLAYED BY THE TURBOCHARGER INERTIA. AFTER THIS FIRST STEP OF VALIDATION OF THE MODEL AND THE CONTROL METHODOLOGY, A SERIES OF PARAMETRIC ANALYSES HAS BEEN PERFORMED. THE EFFECT OF TURBOCHARGER INERTIA MANUFACTURE SCATTERING, FINAL DRIVE GEAR, VEHICLE WEIGHT AND VOLUME DOWNSTREAM OF THE COMPRESSOR ON THE VEHICLE- ENGINE SYSTEM BEHAVIOUR HAS BEEN EVALUATED. 4
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION GT-POWER MODEL DESCRIPTION STEADY STATE ANALYSIS FULL LOAD CURVE TRANSIENT ANALYSIS TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: RESULTS WITH 2 ND, 3 RD, 4 TH AND 5 TH GEARS TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: PARAMETRIC EVALUATIONS REMARKS AND CONCLUSIONS 5
GT-POWER MODEL DESCRIPTION INTAKE SYSTEM: - AIR FILTER - COMPRESSOR - INTERCOOLER - MANIFOLD EXHAUST SYSTEM: - MANIFOLD - TURBINE - EXHAUST NOZZLE TURBOCHARGER CONTROL 6
GT-POWER MODEL DESCRIPTION INTAKE SYSTEM: - AIR FILTER - COMPRESSOR - INTERCOOLER - MANIFOLD EXHAUST SYSTEM: - MANIFOLD - TURBINE - EXHAUST NOZZLE TURBOCHARGER CONTROL 7
GT-POWER MODEL DESCRIPTION INTAKE SYSTEM: - AIR FILTER - COMPRESSOR - INTERCOOLER - MANIFOLD EXHAUST SYSTEM: - MANIFOLD - TURBINE - EXHAUST NOZZLE TURBOCHARGER CONTROL 8
GT-POWER MODEL DESCRIPTION INTAKE SYSTEM: - AIR FILTER - COMPRESSOR - INTERCOOLER - MANIFOLD EXHAUST SYSTEM: - MANIFOLD - TURBINE - EXHAUST NOZZLE TURBOCHARGER CONTROL 9
GT-POWER MODEL DESCRIPTION INTAKE SYSTEM: - AIR FILTER - COMPRESSOR - INTERCOOLER - MANIFOLD EXHAUST SYSTEM: - MANIFOLD - TURBINE - EXHAUST NOZZLE TURBOCHARGER CONTROL 10
GT-POWER MODEL DESCRIPTION INTAKE SYSTEM: - AIR FILTER - COMPRESSOR - INTERCOOLER - MANIFOLD EXHAUST SYSTEM: - MANIFOLD - TURBINE - EXHAUST NOZZLE TURBOCHARGER CONTROL 11
GT-POWER MODEL DESCRIPTION INTAKE SYSTEM: - AIR FILTER - COMPRESSOR - INTERCOOLER - MANIFOLD EXHAUST SYSTEM: - MANIFOLD - TURBINE - EXHAUST NOZZLE TURBOCHARGER CONTROL 12
GT-POWER MODEL DESCRIPTION INTAKE SYSTEM: - AIR FILTER - COMPRESSOR - INTERCOOLER - MANIFOLD EXHAUST SYSTEM: - MANIFOLD - TURBINE - EXHAUST NOZZLE TURBOCHARGER CONTROL 13
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION GT-POWER MODEL DESCRIPTION STEADY STATE ANALYSIS FULL LOAD CURVE TRANSIENT ANALYSIS TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: RESULTS WITH 2 ND, 3 RD, 4 TH AND 5 TH GEARS TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: PARAMETRIC EVALUATIONS REMARKS AND CONCLUSIONS 14
STEADY STATE ANALYSIS FULL LOAD CURVE GT-POWER MODEL VALIDATION WITH EXPERIMENTAL DATA 550 500 450 400 350 300 250 EXPERIMENTAL GT-POWER ENGINE M729 1910 16V JTD ENGINE M729 1910 16V JTD 200 150 100 50 350 300 ENGINE M729 1910 16V JTD ENGINE M729 1910 16V JTD 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 2503500 4000 4500 5000 RPM 200 150 100 EXPERIMENTAL GT-POWER 50 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 RPM 15
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION GT-POWER MODEL DESCRIPTION STEADY STATE ANALYSIS FULL LOAD CURVE TRANSIENT ANALYSIS TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: RESULTS WITH 2 ND, 3 RD, 4 TH AND 5 TH GEARS TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: PARAMETRIC EVALUATIONS REMARKS AND CONCLUSIONS 16
TRANSIENT ANALYSIS ADDITIONAL REQUIRED DATA FOR TRANSIENT ANALYSIS 1910 16V JTD ENGINE ALFA ROMEO 147 VEHICLE - ENGINE INERTIA - TURBOCHARGER INERTIA - VEHICLE MASS - FRONT AREA AND CX - WHEELS INERTIA - FINAL GEAR AND GEARS RATIOS TRANSIENT SIMULATION PHASES 1) THE FIRST PHASE IS NEEDED FOR IDENTIFYING THE INITIAL STEADY-STATE CONDITION OF THE TRANSIENT. THIS MEANS THE CALCULATION OF THE FUEL REQUIRED FOR THE BALANCE BETWEEN THE POWER SUPPLIED BY THE ENGINE AND WHAT REQUESTED BY THE VEHICLE AT A GIVEN VEHICLE VELOCITY WITH FIXED GEAR. 2) THE SECOND PHASE IS THE PHYSICAL TRANSIENT: THE INPUT SIGNAL, CORRESPONDING TO A FUEL STEP FROM PART LOAD TO FULL LOAD, IS APPLIED TO THE ENGINE AND THE VEHICLE-ENGINE SYSTEM CHANGES DEPENDING ON ITS PHYSICAL LAWS. 17
TURBOCHARGER CONTROL FOR TRANSIENT ANALYSIS INTAKE SYSTEM: - AIR FILTER - COMPRESSOR - INTERCOOLER - MANIFOLD EXHAUST SYSTEM: - MANIFOLD - TURBINE - EXHAUST NOZZLE TURBOCHARGER CONTROL 18
TURBOCHARGER CONTROL FOR TRANSIENT ANALYSIS 1) A TURBINE RACK POSITION CONTROL IS NEEDED TO ADJUST THE BOOST PRESSURE DURING THE TRANSIENT. 2) THE TURBINE RACK POSITION CONTROL STRATEGY DURING THE TRANSIENT IS THE FOLLOWING: AT FIRST THE MOST CLOSED RACK POSITION IS EMPLOYED, AND THEN THE FULL LOAD REGULATIONS ARE GRADUALLY USED NEAR THE TARGET BOOST PRESSURE ACHIEVEMENT (THE PID CONTROL ADJUSTS ON STEADY-STATE MAP). BOOST SENSOR RACK ACTUATOR PID 0.1 = MINIMUM TURBINE OPENING 1 = MAXIMUM TURBINE OPENING LIMITER STEADY STATE RACK ENGINE RPM SENSOR SUM 19
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION GT-POWER MODEL DESCRIPTION STEADY STATE ANALYSIS FULL LOAD CURVE TRANSIENT ANALYSIS TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: RESULTS WITH 2 ND, 3 RD, 4 TH AND 5 TH GEARS TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: PARAMETRIC EVALUATIONS REMARKS AND CONCLUSIONS 20
TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: RESULTS II GEAR BOOST PRESSURE: THE COMPARISON BETWEEN THE STEADY-STATE AND TRANSIENT BOOST PRESSURES SHOWS THE ENGINE DELAY TO A DRIVER S REQUEST OF TORQUE, DUE TO THE SO-CALLED TURBOLAG. 2500 STEADY-STATE II GEAR ENGINE M729 1910 16V JTD - VEHICLE 147 2000 TURBOLAG STEADY-STATE BOOST PRESSURE TRANSIENT BOOST PRESSURE 1500 1000 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 RPM 21
TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: RESULTS II GEAR CONTROL STRATEGY: THE PID CONTROL (PID RACK) ADJUSTS TO GET THE TARGET BOOST PRESSURE (STEADY-STATE BOOST PRESSURE) WORKING ON STEADY-STATE MAP (STEADY-STATE RACK). THE RESULTANT SIGNAL (ACTUATOR RACK) OPERATES ON THE TURBINE RACK POSITION. THE GRADUAL ADJUSTEMENT OF THE ACTUATOR RACK AVOIDS THE OVERBOOST PRESSURE AND ITS OSCILLATIONS. 2500 2000 1500 1000 ENGINE M729 M729 1910 1910 16V 16V JTD - VEHICLE 147 STEADY-STATE II GEAR TURBOLAG STEADY-STATE RACK ACTUATOR RACK 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 RPM PID RACK PID RACK ACTUATOR 1.3 RACK1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0-0.1-0.2 STEADY-STATE RACK 22
TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: RESULTS II GEAR EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS THE EXPERIMENTAL VEHICLE TORQUE IS DERIVED FROM ACCELERATION MEASUREMENTS, SOLVING THE MOTION EQUATION. 350 ENGINE ENGINE M729 1910 16V JTD JTD - VEHICLE VEHICLE 147 147 300 250 200 GT-POWER RESULTS 150 100 STEADY-STATE II GEAR 50 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 RPM 23
TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: RESULTS II GEAR THE TURBOLAG PHENOMENON IS MAINLY RELATED TO THE TURBOCHARGER INERTIA. THE GRADUAL ADJUSTEMENT OF THE ACTUATOR RACK AVOIDS THE INCREASE OF TURBINE EXPANSION RATIO ABOVE THE STEADY-STATE VALUES, LIMITING THE OVERBOOST AND THE TURBOCHARGER OVERSPEED EFFECTS. ENGINE M729 1910 16V JTD - VEHICLE 147 300000 3.0 2.8 250000 TURBINE EXPANSION RATIO 2.6 2.4 2.2 200000 2.0 1.8 150000 1.6 TURBOCHARGER SPEED 1.4 1.2 100000 1.0 0.8 50000 0.6 STEADY-STATE 0.4 II GEAR 0.2 0 0.0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 RPM 24
TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: RESULTS II GEAR TYPICAL VEHICLE RESULTS ARE THE VEHICLE SPEED, VEHICLE ACCELERATION AND VEHICLE JERK (ACCELERATION DERIVATIVE). 70 63 56 49 42 35 28 21 14 ENGINE M729 1910 16V JTD - VEHICLE 147 VEHICLE ACCELERATION VEHICLE SPEED VEHICLE JERK 5.0 4.4 3.8 3.2 2.6 2.0 1.4 0.8 0.2 7 II GEAR -0.4 0-1.0 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 TIME [s] 25
TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: RESULTS III GEAR 2500 2000 1500 1000 STEADY-STATE III GEAR STEADY-STATE BOOST PRESSURE TRANSIENT BOOST PRESSURE ENGINE M729 1910 16V JTD - VEHICLE 147 STEADY-STATE RACK 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 RPM ACTUATOR RACK PID RACK 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0-0.1-0.2 26
TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: RESULTS III GEAR EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 350 ENGINE ENGINE M729 M729 1910 16V JTD JTD - VEHICLE VEHICLE 147 147 300 250 200 GT-POWER RESULTS 150 100 STEADY-STATE III GEAR 50 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 RPM 27
TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: RESULTS IV GEAR 2500 2000 1500 1000 STEADY-STATE IV GEAR STEADY-STATE BOOST PRESSURE TRANSIENT BOOST PRESSURE ENGINE M729 1910 16V JTD - VEHICLE 147 STEADY-STATE RACK 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 RPM ACTUATOR RACK PID RACK 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0-0.1-0.2 28
TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: RESULTS IV GEAR EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 350 ENGINE ENGINE M729 M729 1910 1910 16V JTD - VEHICLE VEHICLE 147 147 6000 300 250 ENGINE TORQUE 5000 4000 THE CALCULATED TRANSIENT BOOST PRESSURE SHOWS A DELAY COMPARED TO THE STEADY-STATE ONE. THE CALCULATED TRANSIENT TORQUE REACHES THE STEADY-STATE VALUES IN ADVANCE FOR THE EMPLOYED COMBUSTION MODEL (FULL LOAD COMBUSTIONS). GT-POWER RESULTS 200 150 100 50 TRANSIENT BOOST PRESSURE 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 RPM STEADY-STATE IV GEAR 3000 2000 1000 0 29
TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: RESULTS V GEAR 2500 2000 1500 1000 STEADY-STATE V GEAR STEADY-STATE BOOST PRESSURE TRANSIENT BOOST PRESSURE ENGINE M729 1910 16V JTD - VEHICLE 147 STEADY-STATE RACK 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 RPM ACTUATOR RACK PID RACK 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0-0.1-0.2 30
TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: RESULTS V GEAR EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 350 ENGINE ENGINE M729 M729 1910 191016V 16V JTD - VEHICLE VEHICLE 147 147 6000 300 250 ENGINE TORQUE 5000 4000 THE CALCULATED TRANSIENT BOOST PRESSURE HAS NOT A DELAY COMPARED TO THE STEADY-STATE ONE. THE CALCULATED TRANSIENT TORQUE EXCEEDS THE STEADY-STATE VALUES FOR THE EMPLOYED COMBUSTION MODEL (FULL LOAD COMBUSTIONS). GT-POWER RESULTS 200 150 100 50 TRANSIENT BOOST PRESSURE 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 RPM STEADY-STATE V GEAR 3000 2000 1000 0 31
TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: RESULTS II, III, IV AND V GEARS IN TERMS OF BOOST PRESSURE THE FLUID DYNAMICS EFFECT OF TURBOLAG CORRECTLY CALCULATED BY THE CODE. IS 2500 ENGINE M729 1910 16V JTD - VEHICLE 147 2000 1500 1000 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 RPM STEADY-STATE II GEAR III GEAR IV GEAR V GEAR 32
TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: RESULTS II, III, IV AND V GEARS 2500 2000 1500 ENGINE M729 1910 16V JTD VEHICLE 147 ENGINE M729 1910 16V JTD - VEHICLE 147 BASED ON ENGINE SPEED THE TURBOLAG SEEMS TO BE GREATER FOR LOWER GEARS. ACTUALLY THE TURBOLAG IN TERMS OF TIME IS LONGER FOR THE HIGHER GEARS BECAUSE THE ENGINE SPEED INCREASES MORE SLOWLY. 1000 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 2500 4500 5000 RPM ENGINE M729 1910 16V JTD - VEHICLE 147 4500 4000 3500 2000 3000 2500 2000 1500 1500 II GEAR III GEAR IV GEAR 1000 V GEAR 500 1000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0 555 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 TIME [s] TIME [s] 33
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION GT-POWER MODEL DESCRIPTION STEADY STATE ANALYSIS FULL LOAD CURVE TRANSIENT ANALYSIS TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: RESULTS WITH 2 ND, 3 RD, 4 TH AND 5 TH GEARS TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: PARAMETRIC EVALUATIONS REMARKS AND CONCLUSIONS 34
TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: PARAMETRIC EVALUATIONS THE EFFECT OF THE FOLLOWING PARAMETERS ON THE MODEL HAS BEEN EVALUATED: TURBOCHARGER INERTIA WITH 2 ND GEAR, ANALYSING A POSSIBLE MANUFACTURE SCATTERING OF ± 5% AND ± 10% FOR THE SAME TURBOCHARGER. HIGH PRESSURE INTAKE SYSTEM VOLUME WITH 2 ND GEAR, REDUCING THE LENGTH OF THE PIPES BETWEEN COMPRESSOR AND INTERCOLER AND BETWEEN INTERCOOLER AND INTAKE MANIFOLD (REDUCTION FROM 6.3 TO 4.3 LITRES OF HIGH PRESSURE VOLUME). VEHICLE WEIGHT WITH 2 ND, 3 RD, 4 TH AND 5 TH GEARS, INCREASING ITS VALUE OF 200 KG. FINAL GEAR RATIO WITH 2 ND, 3 RD, 4 TH AND 5 TH GEARS, INCREASING ITS VALUE OF 10%. 35
TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: TURBOCHARGER INERTIA EFFECT 2500 ENGINE M729 1910 16V JTD JTD - VEHICLE VEHICLE 147 147 2000 THE TURBOCHARGER INERTIA EFFECT, DUE TO THE MANUFACTURE SCATTERING, IS LIMITED IN TERMS OF BOOST PRESSURE OR VEHICLE PERFORMANCE. 1500 1000 70 63 56 ENGINE M729 1910 16V JTD - VEHICLE 147 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 II GEAR 3500 - TURBOCHARGER 49 4000 4500 INERTIA 5000-10% RPM II GEAR - TURBOCHARGER INERTIA +10% 42 VEHICLE SPEED 35 28 21 II GEAR - TURBOCHARGER INERTIA BASELINE II GEAR - TURBOCHARGER INERTIA -5% II GEAR - TURBOCHARGER INERTIA +5% VEHICLE ACCELERATION 11.0 9.8 8.6 7.4 6.2 5.0 3.8 2.6 14 7 VEHICLE JERK 1.4 0.2 0-1.0 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 TIME [s] 36
TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: HIGH PRESSURE VOLUME EFFECT 2500 ENGINE M729 1910 16V JTD JTD - VEHICLE VEHICLE 147 147 2000 1500 350 ENGINE M729 1910 16V JTD - VEHICLE 147 DURING TRANSIENT THE EFFECT OF HIGH PRESSURE VOLUME REDUCTION (32%) IS LIMITED IN TERMS OF BOOST PRESSURE. 1000 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 250 RPM IN STEADY-STATE CONDITION THE PIPES LENGTH REDUCTION CHANGES THE BEHAVIOUR OF THE VOLUMETRIC EFFICIENCY AND THEN THE ENGINE TORQUE. THE TRANSIENT ENGINE TORQUE IS AFFECTED BY THE STEADY-STATE CURVE. 300 200 150 100 50 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 RPM STEADY-STATE - VOLUME 6.3 l STEADY-STATE - VOLUME 4.3 l II GEAR - VOLUME 6.3 l II GEAR - VOLUME 4.3 l 37
TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: VEHICLE WEIGHT EFFECT DURING TRANSIENT THE VEHICLE WEIGHT INCREASES THE ENGINE DELAY TO A DRIVER S REQUEST OF TORQUE. 2500 ENGINE M729 1910 16V JTD - VEHICLE 147 2000 II GEAR BASELINE III GEAR BASELINE IV GEAR BASELINE 1500 V GEAR BASELINE II GEAR - WEIGHT + 200 KG III GEAR - WEIGHT + 200 KG IV GEAR - WEIGHT + 200 KG V GEAR - WEIGHT + 200 KG 1000 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 TIME [s] 38
TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: FINAL GEAR RATIO EFFECT DURING TRANSIENT THE VEHICLE FINAL GEAR RATIO INCREASES THE ENGINE DELAY TO A DRIVER S REQUEST OF TORQUE. 2500 ENGINE M729 1910 16V JTD - VEHICLE 147 2000 II GEAR BASELINE III GEAR BASELINE IV GEAR BASELINE 1500 V GEAR BASELINE II GEAR - FINAL GEAR RATIO +10% III GEAR - FINAL GEAR RATIO +10% IV GEAR - FINAL GEAR RATIO +10% V GEAR - FINAL GEAR RATIO +10% 1000 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 TIME [s] 39
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION GT-POWER MODEL DESCRIPTION STEADY STATE ANALYSIS FULL LOAD CURVE TRANSIENT ANALYSIS TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: RESULTS WITH 2 ND, 3 RD, 4 TH AND 5 TH GEARS TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: PARAMETRIC EVALUATIONS REMARKS AND CONCLUSIONS 40
TRANSIENT SIMULATION REMARKS THE TRANSIENT SIMULATION REQUIRES A VERY GOOD AND DETAILED STEADY-STATE MODEL. THE SETTING OF THE CONTROL PARAMETERS (PID) HAS BEEN CARRIED OUT IN 2 ND GEAR, WHERE THE CONTROL HAS TO BE FASTER FOR THE HIGHER ENGINE-VEHICLE ACCELERATION; THE DETECTED PARAMETERS DON T CHANGE FOR THE SIMULATIONS WITH THE OTHER GEARS. THE PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS FOR DIFFERENT GEARS IS VERY SIMPLE: IT IS ENOUGH TO CHANGE THE GEAR NUMBER. THE GT-POWER CALCULATION TIME ON PC (INTEL PENTIUM 4 - CPU 1500 MHZ) VARIES FROM 30 MINUTES (II GEAR) TO 90 MINUTES ABOUT (V GEAR) FOR THE ANALYZED CONFIGURATION. 41
CONCLUSIONS BY THE USE OF ONE DIMENSIONAL GT-POWER CODE IT IS POSSIBLE: TO ANALYZE ENGINE-VEHICLE TRANSIENTS, ALSO CONSIDERING THE RESPONSE DELAY FOR TURBOCHARGED ENGINES, DUE TO THE TURBOLAG EFFECT. TO STUDY THE PERFORMANCE SUPPLIED BY THE ENGINE-VEHICLE SYSTEM FOR DIFFERENT ENGINE OR VEHICLE PARAMETERS. BY THIS CALCULATION METHODOLOGY IT IS POSSIBLE TO DEFINE THE BEST FLUID DYNAMICS LAYOUT FOR THE INTAKE AND EXHAUST MANIFOLDS AND TURBOCHARGER TYPE FOR TURBOCHARGED ENGINES, EVALUATING THE STEADY-STATE AND TRANSIENT PERFORMANCE. 42
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS THE AUTHORS WISH TO THANK GAMMA TECHNOLOGIES INC., FOR THE SUPPORT PROVIDED CONCERNING THE GT-POWER CODE AND, IN PARTICULAR, TO JOHN WILKEN FOR HIS HELPFUL SUGGESTIONS. FINALLY A SPECIAL THANK IS DUE TO LUIGI PILO (FGP - ITALY) FOR PROVIDING THE VEHICLE EXPERIMENTAL DATA AND TO MARCO TONETTI (CRF) FOR HIS SUGGESTIONS ABOUT THE REAL CONTROL SYSTEM STRATEGY. 43