TRANSIENT MAGNETIC FLUX DENSITY MEASUREMENT RESULTS ON A FUSELAGE-LIKE TEST SETUP AND INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF APERTURES

Similar documents
HIGH REPETITION RATE CHARGING A MARX TYPE GENERATOR *

TARDEC Technology Integration

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Energy Storage Overview Mr. David Skalny & Dr. Laurence Toomey 10 August 2011

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Track & Suspension Overview Mr. Jason Alef & Mr. Geoff Bossio 11 Aug 2011

FINAL REPORT FOR THE C-130 RAMP TEST #3 OF A HYDREMA MINE CLEARING VEHICLE

REMOTE MINE AREA CLEARANCE EQUIPMENT (MACE) C-130 LOAD CELL TEST DATA

Helicopter Dynamic Components Project. Presented at: HCAT Meeting January 2006

Robot Drive Motor Characterization Test Plan

LESSONS LEARNED WHILE MEASURING FUEL SYSTEM DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE MARK HEATON AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA 10 MAY 2011

AFRL-RX-TY-TM

Automatic Air Collision Avoidance System. Auto-ACAS. Mark A. Skoog Dryden Flight Research Center - NASA. AutoACAS. Dryden Flight Research Center

Alternative Fuels: FT SPK and HRJ for Military Use

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 3

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Non-primary Power Systems Overview Kevin Centeck and Darin Kowalski 10 Aug 2011

Feeding the Fleet. GreenGov Washington D.C. October 31, 2011

Energy Storage Commonality Military vs. Commercial Trucks

Servicing Hawker Vehicle Batteries with Standard Battery Charging and Test Equipment

TARDEC Robotics. Dr. Greg Hudas UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

Evaluation of SpectroVisc Q3000 for Viscosity Determination

TARDEC --- TECHNICAL REPORT ---

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 4

F100 ENGINE NACELLE FIRE FIGHTING TEST MOCKUP DRAWINGS

High efficiency variable speed versatile power air conditioning system for military vehicles

Energy Storage Requirements & Challenges For Ground Vehicles

UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution A. Approved for Public Release TACOM Case # 21906, 26 May Vehicle Electronics and Architecture

TARDEC OVERVIEW. Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center. APTAC Spring Conference Detroit 27 March, 2007

2011 NDIA GROUND VEHICLE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM POWER AND MOBILITY (P&M) MINI-SYMPOSIUM AUGUST 9-11 DEARBORN, MICHIGAN

US Army Non - Human Factor Helicopter Mishap Findings and Recommendations. Major Robert Kent, USAF, MC, SFS

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

GM-TARDEC Autonomous Safety Collaboration Meeting

INTELLIGENT ENERGY MANAGEMENT IN A TWO POWER-BUS VEHICLE SYSTEM. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

SIO Shipyard Representative Bi-Weekly Progress Report

US ARMY POWER OVERVIEW

Does V50 Depend on Armor Mass?

Presented by Mr. Greg Kilchenstein OSD, Maintenance. 29August 2012

DSCC Annual Tire Conference CATL UPDATE. March 24, 2011 UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

U.S. Army/CERDEC's Portable Fuel Cell Evaluation and Field Testing 2011 Fuel Cell Seminar & Expo Orlando, FL 31 Oct 2011

Quarterly Progress Report

An Advanced Fuel Filter

Cadmium Repair Alternatives on High-Strength Steel January 25, 2006 Hilton San Diego Resort 1775 East Mission Bay Drive San Diego, CA 92109

Monolithically Integrated Micro Flapping Vehicles

Open & Evolutive UAV Architecture

Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Command (TARDEC) Overview

Dual Use Ground Vehicle Condition-Based Maintenance Project B

EVALUATING VOLTAGE REGULATION COMPLIANCE OF MIL-PRF-GCS600A(ARMY) FOR VEHICLE ON-BOARD GENERATORS AND ASSESSING OVERALL VEHICLE BUS COMPLIANCE

Application of Airbag Technology for Vehicle Protection

UNCLASSIFIED: DIST A. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. ARMY GREATEST INVENTIONS CY 2009 PROGRAM MRAP Overhead Wire Mitigation (OWM) Kit

Evaluation of Single Common Powertrain Lubricant (SCPL) Candidates for Fuel Consumption Benefits in Military Equipment

Predator B: The Multi-Role UAV

TARDEC Hybrid Electric Program Last Decade

EXPLORATORY DISCUSSIONS - PRE DECISIONAL

Navy Coalescence Test on Camelina HRJ5 Fuel

Navy Coalescence Test on Petroleum F-76 Fuel with Infineum R655 Lubricity Improver at 300 ppm

Hydro-Piezoelectricity: A Renewable Energy Source For Autonomous Underwater Vehicles

DESULFURIZATION OF LOGISTIC FUELS FOR FUEL CELL APUs

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

FTTS Utility Vehicle UV2 Concept Review FTTS UV2 Support Variant

Predator Program Office

Evaluation of Digital Refractometers for Field Determination of FSII Concentration in JP-5 Fuel

DEVELOPMENT OF COMPACT VARIABLE- VOLTAGE, BI-DIRECTIONAL 100KW DC-DC CONVERTER

Power Distribution System for a Small Unmanned Rotorcraft

Robust Fault Diagnosis in Electric Drives Using Machine Learning

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards VHG Labs Inc. Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100 and D12-XXX Series Standards

Additives to Increase Fuel Heat Sink Capacity

Development of Man Portable Auxiliary Power Unit using Advanced Large Format Lithium-Ion Cells

Up-Coming Diesel Fuel and Exhaust Emissions Regulations For Mobile Sources. Parminder Khabra RDECOM-TARDEC TACOM LCMC March 22, 2006 JSEM

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Power Requirements

Portable Fluid Analyzer

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards SCP Science (Conostan) Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100, and D12-XXX Series Standards

BALANCE OF PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS FOR SURVIVABILITY AND MOBILITY IN THE DEMONSTRATOR FOR NOVEL DESIGN (DFND) VEHICLE CONCEPTS

Multilevel Vehicle Design: Fuel Economy, Mobility and Safety Considerations, Part B

Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

Hybrid Components: Motors and Power Electronics

CAPACITOR AND RAIL-GAP DEVELOPMENT FOR THE ATLAS MACHINE MARX MODULES

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

NoFoam Unit Installation, Evaluation and Operations Manual

Membrane Wing Aerodynamics for µav Applications

NDCEE National Defense Center for Energy and Environment

A BATTERY POWERED, 200-KW RAPID CAPACITOR CHARGER FOR A PORTABLE RAILGUN IN BURST MODE OPERATION AT 3 RPS

DESIGN OF A COMPACT, LIGHTWEIGHT PULSED HOMOPOLAR GENERATOR POWER SUPPLY J. H. Gully, R. A. Marshall, M. A. Pichot, and W. F.

INLINE MONITORING OF FREE WATER AND PARTICULATE CONTAMINATION OF JET A FUEL

Power Technology Branch Army Power Division US Army RDECOM CERDEC C2D Fort Belvoir, Virginia

Center for Ground Vehicle Development and Integration

Blast Pendulum Testing of Milliken Tegris Panels

Fuel Efficient ground vehicle Demonstrator (FED) Vision

Program Overview. Chris Mocnik Robotic Vehicle Control Architecture for FCS ATO Manager U.S. Army RDECOM TARDEC

Endurance Testing of Redesigned Tab Spring for MI-RAMS System

Impact of 200 ppm HiTEC 4898C Lubricity Improver Additive (LIA) on F-76 Fuel Coalescence

Methylene Chloride Alternative HAP-Free Chemical Paint Strippers at Anniston Army Depot

IMPACT OF FRICTION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGIES ON FUEL ECONOMY FOR GROUND VEHICLES G. R. Fenske, R. A. Erck, O. O. Ajayi, A. Masoner, and A. S.

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Linear Algebraic Modeling of Power Flow in the HMPT500-3 Transmission

GVSET Power & Energy Preview Mr. Chuck Coutteau Associate Director (Acting) Ground Vehicle Power & Mobility 19 August 2009

ITC-Germany Visit. Chuck Coutteau, Associate Director Ground Vehicle Power and Mobility Overview 10 November 2011

Distribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

AFRL-RX-TY-TP

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Transcription:

TRANSIENT MAGNETIC FLUX DENSITY MEASUREMENT RESULTS ON A FUSELAGE-LIKE TEST SETUP AND INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF APERTURES S. A. Sebo, R. Caldecott, Ö. Altay, L. Schweickart,* J. C. Horwath,* L. C. Walko* Department of Electrical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, U.S.A. *Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433, U.S.A. Abstract: Investigation of susceptibility of airborne equipment to high transient magnetic fields was conducted in a high current- and in a high voltage laboratory. Metal test cylinders were subjected to current impulses, up to 15 ka, simulating high surge currents, representing directed energy applications or lightning strokes. The cylinder used in the high current laboratory is made of aluminum and is representative in size and construction of an aircraft fuselage. Surge current measurements, db/dt measurements outside and inside the test cylinders (B is the magnetic flux density), and the measured effects of apertures (open or closed) are described in the paper. I. INTRODUCTION When an aircraft is in flight, it might be hit by a lightning stroke during thunderstorms [1]. When that happens, the lightning current flows along the surface of the aircraft affecting the aircraft. Either the surge current or the magnetic field created by the surge current can penetrate the fuselage through an aperture or by diffusion through the aircraft skin that can cause electromagnetic (EM) interference with on-board electronics. At the High Power Laboratory of the Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (WPAFB), an aluminum test cylinder, representative in size and construction of an aircraft fuselage, was subjected to high surge currents, up to 15 ka. Transient magnetic flux density (db/dt) measurements were conducted outside and inside the test cylinder at various test points. The susceptibility of airborne vehicles to EM transients has been studied for many years [2, 3]. Knowing the magnetic flux density (B) distribution inside when the surge current flows through the fuselage can be helpful in evaluating the EM compatibility performance of the airborne equipment. The main objective of this paper is to describe the test setup used for surge current and db/dt measurements along the test cylinder, and to present some of the measurement results. II. HIGH POWER TEST FACILITIES The High Power Laboratory of the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) at WPAFB has a surge current generator (up to 20 ka discharge currents), an aluminum test cylinder simulating an aircraft fuselage, a shielded room, and data acquisition system. For the tests, a coaxial arrangement was prepared to investigate the effects of inside magnetic field sources such as a conductor carrying a large current inside the full-length cylinder. The test setup consists of the test cylinder, and a high voltage cable without its shield. The test setup is shown in Figure 1. The back-end connections of the cylinder can be seen in Figure 2. Return lead Front end 14 insulated 16 AWG conductors HV cable Test cylinder Figure 1. Test setup. Back end The aluminum test cylinder is fabricated from 0.125 inch thick aluminum sheets. Both ends are closed. The cylinder is 0.965 m (38 in) in diameter, 9.754 m (32 ft) long, and it consists of 4 sections. For the simulation of access panels, 16 panels, 0.61 m by 0.38 m (24 in by 15 in), are available along the cylinder. There is a large bank of capacitors that provides the discharge current pulse. This capacitor bank is connected to the center conductor. The current return path is the cylinder itself. Figure 2. Rear view of the test cylinder. III. db/dt MEASUREMENTS Brass disk 16 insulated 16 AWG conductors For the measurement of the db/dt inside the test cylinder, the test setup shown in Figure 3 was prepared. By using a fiberglass arm between the center conductor and the edge of the window a bridge was made on 0-7803-7915-2/03/$17.00 2003IEEE. 693

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE JUN 2003 2. REPORT TYPE N/A 3. DATES COVERED - 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Transient Magnetic Flux Density Measurement Results On A Fuselage-Like Test Setup And Investigation Of The Effects Of Apertures 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Department of Electrical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, U.S.A. 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release, distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES See also ADM002371. 2013 IEEE Pulsed Power Conference, Digest of Technical Papers 1976-2013, and Abstracts of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science. IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference (19th). Held in San Francisco, CA on 16-21 June 2013. U.S. Government or Federal Purpose Rights License. 14. ABSTRACT Investigation of susceptibility of airborne equipment to high transient magnetic fields was conducted in a high current- and in a high voltage laboratory. Metal test cylinders were subjected to current impulses, up to 15 ka, simulating high surge currents, representing directed energy applications or lightning strokes. The cylinder used in the high current laboratory is made of aluminum and is representative in size and construction of an aircraft fuselage. Surge current measurements, db/dt measurements outside and inside the test cylinders (B is the magnetic flux density), and the measured effects of apertures (open or closed) are described in the paper. 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT SAR a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 4 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

which to place the probes. This fiberglass bridge was positioned at the center line of #7 of the 16 windows. Four measurement locations were marked on the bridge, with a distance 15.2 cm (6 in) between adjacent measurement points. Position 1 was directly above the center conductor, and Position 4 was near the edge of Window 7. The bridge is shown in Figure 4. Figure 3. db/dt test setup on the bridge at Window 7. 6 inches 6 inches 6 inches 1 2 3 4 Center conductor Fiberglass tube Fiberglass arm Cube probe and filters Figure 4. Bridge and probe positions. For the inside measurement series at the center line of Window 7 a db/dt probe was placed onto the bridge at four locations shown in Figure 4. One of the coils of a dual coil db/dt probe was used for these measurements. Depending on the signal level, appropriate attenuators were added to the circuit. At the same time another db/dt probe was placed at the center line of Section 7 on the top of the outside surface of the cylinder. This probe location was not changed during the tests. One of the coils of this probe was used for the measurement of the outside db/dt. The plane of the coil was axial and vertical. The inside probe was attached to Positions 1 to 4, respectively, and each time the outside and inside probe outputs were saved. The entire measurement series was repeated for the closed aperture (window) case as well. The current maximum values were around 7 ka. The maximum values of B at the outside point were around 1,700 mg. In terms of zero-to-maximum times and tail times the results were in good agreement. To investigate the aperture effects a test setup shown in Figure 5 was prepared. For that purpose it was decided to use both coils of a dual coil probe for the inside db/dt measurements. Also, to study the effect of different aperture (window) cover panel materials, a window cover made of a resistive composite material (about 100 ohms/sq. surface resistivity) was prepared for the measurements. By using either the original aluminum or the resistive composite panel at the same location, the effects of open window, aluminum panel and composite panel on the db/dt distribution were measured. During these measurements, the fiberglass bridge was positioned at a 22.5 degree angle from the horizontal edge of Window 7 (Figure 5). A db/dt probe was placed at the end of the fiberglass bridge. By using two test coils, i.e., two orthogonal coils of the same dual coil db/dt probe, two components of the db/dt were measured. Again, to monitor the outside magnetic flux density, a db/dt probe was left attached to the top of the cylinder at the center line of Window 7. During these tests the current maximum values were again around 7.3 ka. Table 1 gives the measurement results for these test series. The maximum B values calculated from outside db/dt measurements were around 1,800 mg for the open aperture. When the resistive composite panel covered Window 7, practically no change in the maximum outside B values was observed. In other words, using that particular composite material panel did not result in any change of side the test cylinder. However, when an aluminum panel covered Window 7, the maximum outside B values decreased significantly. The B values were around 500 mg. For the outside db/dt probe the dominant magnetic field source was the center conductor and the magnetic field was extended to the outside area through the open aperture, Window 7. When the aperture panel was closed the maximum B values were reduced. For the inside measurements the situation was the opposite. Using a resistive composite panel on Window 7 did not change the inside db/dt measurement much. When using an aluminum panel, though, the maximum value of the inside magnetic flux density increased because closing the window kept the magnetic flux lines inside the cylinder, increasing the maximum B value at that point. o 22.5 Vertical coil Horizontal coil Figure 5. test setup, both probe coils used. 694

Table 1. Outside and inside B measurement results. Cover of Window #7 db/dt Coil I max (A) max Vert. B max Horiz. B max Open Vert. 7,522 1,850 66,000 Open Horiz. 7,384 1,858 86,000 Composite Horiz. 7,260 1,830 78,000 Composite Horiz. 7,384 1,818 84,000 Aluminum Horiz. 7,316 530 110,000 Aluminum Vert. 7,178 520 77,000 Composite Vert. 7,316 1,906 64,500 Open Vert. 7,248 1,740 65,500 Later on the inside bridge measurements (see Figure 3) were repeated for a new measurement series. The same test setup, shown in Figure 4, was used. Measurement results are given in Table 2. The db/dt measurements were conducted at Window 7. For the outside db/dt measurements a probe was attached to the top of the test cylinder, at the center line of Window 7, and the plane of the db/dt probe coil was vertical. For the inside db/dt measurements a probe was attached to the fiberglass bridge at each one of the four marked positions, in order to determine the B vs. time at these points; the plane of the db/dt probe was horizontal (or close to horizontal), in order to pick up the maximum component of db/dt. The measurements were repeated for open window and closed window. Table 2 shows the test results of current and outside B maximum values and zero-to-maximum times for the current and for side, for open window and closed window (with aluminum window panel) cases. Table 2. Evaluation of test results. Window #7 I max (A) max t max of I (µs) t max of (µs) Open 6,426 1,440 9.8 7.2 Closed 6,456 520 9.9 7.6 Open 6,448 1,680 10.2 7.8 Closed 6,518 540 9.9 8.0 Open 6,516 1,700 10.3 7.5 Closed 6,518 NA 10.1 NA Open 6,516 1,760 9.8 7.2 Closed 6,578 480 9.8 6.7 The current maximum values were around 6.5 ka; the maximum values of the outside B were around 1,400-1,800 mg, similar to values obtained during previous experiments. One of the results was that closing the aperture (Window 7) reduced the maximum value of the outside B significantly. Figure 6 shows an example for the processed current wave shape and for the calibrated outside B vs. time curve as well. When the current maximum value was about 6,500 A, the corresponding outside B at the top of the cylinder at the center line of Section 7 was in the vicinity of 1,800 mg. The wave shapes are in good agreement in terms of zero-to-maximum and tail times. B ka/100 7.00E-02 6.00E-02 5.00E-02 4.00E-02 3.00E-02 2.00E-02 1.00E-02 2.00E+03 1.60E+03 1.20E+03 8.00E+02 4.00E+02 3.00E-05 6.00E-05 9.00E-05 1.20E-04 (a) 2.00E-05 4.00E-05 6.00E-05 8.00E-05 (b) Figure 6. An example: (a) Processed current data. (b) Corresponding calibrated outside B vs. time. Numerous db/dt measurements were conducted inside the test cylinder. Their analysis will be reported in another paper. IV. HIGH VOLTAGE LAB TESTS The High Voltage Laboratory of The Ohio State University (OSU) has a voltage surge generator capable of up to about 1000 kv. Various experiments were conducted at OSU related to the calibration of measurement devices, investigation of the db/dt probe performance, and simulation of the test setups at AFRL. In addition to these, in order to prepare for measurements on the actual test setup at AFRL, a model of the test cylinder setup, significantly smaller in size, was built at OSU. This small test setup was useful since various procedures and techniques were tested for several measurement problems relevant for the full scale tests at AFRL. These preliminary studies were necessary to get more accurate results and save time during the full scale test cylinder measurements. A steel test cylinder, 152.4 cm (5 ft) long and 30.5 cm (12 in) outside diameter, was employed for these test series. In addition to the difference in sizes, an aperture (window) with a metal lid was used for this coaxial arrangement. The lid was also made of steel. The window was at the middle of the cylinder. The window size was about 30 cm long and 15 cm wide. To investigate the performance of composite materials, a 695

panel, with the same dimensions as the steel aperture cover, was made of the resistive composite material mentioned earlier, sprayed onto a flexible PVC sheet. Using removable covers enabled the operator to install the inside db/dt measurement devices easily, as well as to simulate the aperture effects observed on the test cylinder at AFRL. The cylinder had two removable end caps. There is an opening on the front cap for the fiber optic cable, used for the data acquisition system. To monitor the magnetic flux density inside and outside the coaxial test arrangement, a test setup was prepared which is shown in Figure 7. The center conductor inside the cylinder was energized at the front end, and was connected to the cylinder at the back end cap. The cylinder was the return path; it was grounded at the front end. Figure 7 (a) shows the front view, and (b) shows the side view of the 12-inch test cylinder at OSU. The db/dt test results were processed successfully at various test points. B vs. time functions were derived based on db/dt measurements. The measured current and calculated B vs. time wave shapes show very good correspondence. Measurements of the db/dt for various aperture (window) covers showed that using a resistive composite panel as a fuselage window cover instead of leaving the window open hardly changed the outside and inside db/dt measurement results. Volts 6.00E-01 4.50E-01 3.00E-01 1.50E-01 Ø 12 in Center conductor Insulation (grommet) Opening for the optical cable 45 W indow with panel (a) Front view of the cylinder 1.00E-05 2.00E-05 3.00E-05 4.00E-05 5.00E-05 3.00E+02 2.25E+02 Figure 8. Surge current output. End cap PVC pipe Front cap B 1.50E+02 5/8 in 7.50E+01 152.4 cm (b) Test Cylinder Side view of the cylinder Figure 7. 12-inch test cylinder with window and its connection. To insulate the center conductor from the front cap an insulating grommet was used. The center conductor was inside a PVC pipe. For the inside db/dt measurements a probe was attached onto a cardboard bridge placed between the center conductor and the edge of the window. The plane of the probe coil was aligned with the center conductor. As an example of the test results, when the probe was at 114 mm distance from the center conductor, corresponding current and processed B vs. time functions at that particular measurement point are given in Figures 8 and 9. V. CONCLUSIONS By using a coaxial test setup, transient current and db/dt measurements inside and outside an approx. 10 meter long and 1 meter diameter aluminum test cylinder were conducted. 1.00E-05 2.00E-05 3.00E-05 4.00E-05 5.00E-05 Figure 9. B vs. time function. VI. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was partially supported by the Dayton Area Graduate Studies Institute through PR-OSU-00-13. The support is gratefully acknowledged. VII. REFERENCES [1] M. A. Uman: "All About Lightning, Dover, New York, 1986. [2] S. A. Sebo, R. Caldecott, D. L. Schweickart, L. C. Walko, J. C. Horwath, The Development of a Transient Magnetic Field Measurement Technique for Implementation on a Fuselage-Like Test Setup, Proc. of the 13th IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference, Las Vegas, 2001. [3] Aircraft Lightning Protection Handbook, The Internal Fields Coupled by Diffusion and Redistribution, 1989, Ch. 11. Author address: Stephen A. Sebo Department of Electrical Engineering The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio 43210-1272, U.S.A. E-mail: sebo.1@osu.edu 696