HUNGARY AS EUROPEAN HUB FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE DESIGN Project presentation, December, 2017
Content What is the challenge? (Road) mobility as social need Opportunities and limitations of automatized vehicle driving Status of the Proving Ground project What steps led till today? Proving Ground Concept Project overview Why Hungary? The Hungarian automotive industry Previous activities in the field of electronic vehicle control Status of academic and industrial R&D Model of operation, services Business model principles Service portfolio Status of business development Principles of operation What can be tested? Functional overview Test track modules Services in detail. 2
What is the challenge?
Mobility as social challenge Inspirating factors for development 1 Zero Emission 2 Demographic pressure 3 Risk of accidents Fuel-consumption reduction Reducing emission Support of insecure leaders Increase the elderly mobility Avoidance of the accidents by reducing the effect of human mistakes 4 Increasing traffic density Management of transport process Comfortable, time-saving travel 5 Assistance systems Intelligent sensors for appropriate process Intelligent actuators (steering, brakes, etc.) Source: VDA What is the challenge? 4
Multi-level approach There is no one single good solution Optimization of the components and the whole conventional drive train system Introduction of new alternative fuels, drive systems, enhance energy recuperation Control of vehicle groups on different levels: traffic control, platoon control, fleet control What is the challenge? 5
Mobility as social challenge Technology is available Longitudinal control Transverse control Parking, maneuvering ACC traffic-jam assistant emergency braking assistant Lane-changing assistant, lanekeeping assitant Automated parking assistant Lighting Drive supervision Environmental supervision Adaptive long-distance lighting, adaptive cornering ligths Fatigue supervision Traffic sign detection Source: VDA What is the challenge? 6
Technical background Systems available nowadays Traffic-jam pilot Highway pilot Advanced Driving Assisatance Google car Pikes Peak Emergency Brake Assistance Source: VDA What is the challenge? 7
Technology is available since a long time Chaffeur II demonstrator in 1999 What is the challenge? 8
Increase level of automation and co-operative control Increase safety Reduce fatalities Increase efficiency Communication is introduced in vehicles Telematics Increase of level of assistance / automation Reduce emissions Support competiveness Governments are requested to provide a framework What is the challenge? 9
Vehicle - driver Change in driver s responsibility Levels of automatization The driver controls the vehicle, both longitudinally and transversely. No active intervening system. The role and responsibility of the driver just like today The driver controls the vehicle, either longitudinally or transversely. The intelligent systems intervene in the other direction. The driver constantly supervises the systems. The intelligent systems take the control in both longitudinal and transversal direction for a given time. The role and responsibility of the driver change, legal background The driver don t have to constantly supervise the system. The intelligent system fully takes control, intervenes, even in critical situations. The driver has enough time to take control. The vehicle is fully automated, the driver does not have to supervise the system. Only driver Driver support Partially automated Highly automated Fully automated Level Level of of automatization What is the challenge? 10
Mobility as social challenge Change in driver s responsibility TODAY 2017 TOMORROW < 2020 FUTURE > 2020 Lane departure warning Longitudinal control Emergency brake system Active steering Object detection in dead spot ACC + LKA Automated driving: The driver can do other activities Autonomous driving: Low following distance, lower fuel consumption DRIVER IS PART OF THE VEHICLE CONTROL FAIL SAFE SYSTEM DRIVER IS INACTIVE FAIL TOLERANT SYSTEM Source: Volvo, Knorr-Bremse What is the challenge? 11
Technical background Technology is ready - is it enough? Architecture Communication Rendundant central control unit Redundant communication in the car and with the outside (V2V, V2I) Power supply Redundant, galvanically separated energy storage and supervision system Sensors Redundant or error-tolerant sensors to supervise the condition of the vehicle Actuators What is the challenge? Redundant or error-tolerant intervention elements in the vehicle (steering wheel, brake, etc.) 12
Non-technical aspects Vienna treaty (1968) Basic requirements from 1968: All vehicles shall have a driver The driver shall control the vehicle all the constantly 23rd of March, 2016: A modification to the principles above, gives permission for automatization if the driver can overrule and turn it off What is the challenge? 13
How things will be combined? Platooning is a good example! Vehicles are travelling in a platoon are: Co-operatively controlled (communication among the members) Utilizing the road infrastructure in a more efficient way Reducing the fuel consumption and emission of the set of the vehicles Minimizing driver s fatigue and thus Probability of the accidents will be reduced What is the challenge? 14
In some sense: yes Optimal bio-intelligent system Transfered goods and navigation system Primary environment observer Redundant observer Transfer of the motion demand Motion coordination Biomechanical Motion realization What is the challenge? 15
Architecture in more technical way Corresponds to the bio-intelligent system Physical separation Functional separation CABIN Only Electrical Interface New operating philosophy: sidestick,... ACC, lane follower, autonomous driving Collision avoidance speed vector MMI (Man-Machine Interface) Automation of inputs Predictive input correction DRIVELINE What is the challenge? Translation to powertrain component inputs ESP, ESP with steering Powertrain co-ordination Reactive input correction Mechatronic subsystems: steering, engine, transmission... Execution 16
Models of Mobility will Change Non-technical questions will also appear Source: Technologiereview, VDA Can we take away the enjoyment of driving from the driver? As different to the other co-operatively drivable vehicles (plane, boat, rail) we must be ready to manage the vehicles to handle the dangerous situations while having human participants with unperfect and very different abilities? What is the base of decision if we must choose from two bad options? Liability and legal concerns remain open for a while New business models/players will appear New concerns will rise: how can we guarantee, that autonomous vehicles will not be put in non-proper use, etc. Number of test/use cases can exponentially increase Model of operation 17
Why Hungary?
Characteristics of the Hungarian Automotive Industry Most deterministic industry in the country The Hungarian automotive industry has Source: Hungarian Statistical Office, 2016 Why Hungary? 19
Key players in Automotive Industry 700 automotive companies operate in Hungary out of the world TOP 20 TIER1 suppliers 15 have locations here Why Hungary? 20
Long term competency in electronic vehicle control High-level research already in the 80 s ESP with brake and steering intervention Intelligent 4WS ESP for trucks International regulation for ESP (WP29/GRRF) initiated by the Hungarian government 1987 1995 2001 2004 2006 Why Hungary? 21
Research Projects in HUNGARY ADAS Systems Adaptive speed control Visual-based control ACC with extended functionality 1996 2004 2010 2014 Why Hungary? 22
Research Projects in HUNGARY Driverless Transportation On-site driverless maneuvering Platooning in 1999 and in 2012 1999 2002 2012 2016 Why Hungary? 23
Long term competency in electronic vehicle control Participation in all relevant large scale EU FP projects Budapest University of Technology and Economics Hungarian Academy of Sciences University of Szeged Széchenyi István University University of Pannonia Óbuda University Why Hungary? 24
Status of the project What does Zalaegerszeg Proving Ground offer?
Co-operating industrial partners in requirement definition Industry demand is fulfilled Automotive Working Group, 2015: AImotive, AVL, BME GJT, BOSCH, Commsignia, Knorr-Bremse, Continental, EVOPRO, NKH, NI, SZTAKI, ThyssenKrupp Presta, TÜV Rheinland, ZF Detailed technical specification of the classic elements of vehicle dynamics and physical structure of the automated vehicle tests Draft specification of the autonomous environment and related communication infrastructure Technical proposal for autonomous vehicle public road testing ICT Working Group, 2017: BME HIT, BME KJIT, BPC, Ericsson, HUAWEI, Kapsch, Magyar Közút, Magyar Telekom, NFM, NMHH, Nokia, Oracle, RWE, Siemens, SWARCO, T-Systems, Vodafone (compared to the new members of the automotive working group) Detailed specification of the autonomous vehicle environment and related communication infrastructure Status of the project CONTINUOUS VALIDATION! 26
Decision on Public Investment Testing Zone Government of Hungary is Committed to Innovative Industries Capacity constraints in Europe in area of vehicle dynamic testing Technology change in vehicle industry single vehicle vs. co-operative vehicle control: different development environment is required Decision of Hungarian Government in 2016: contribution to the European automotive community Test field for classic and automated and connected vehicles in Hungary Status of the project 1000 km 27
Multi-level testing environment From computer to real traffic essential for automated driving Public road Limited public road Proving ground Laboratory Simulation XiSc Real public road environment Controlled public road tests: City / Rural-HW Controlled systemtest Component test, integration test Conceptual and feasability test Status of the project 28
Overview of the Layout of the Unique Proving Ground Traditional and autonomous testing modules 265 ha Concept is based on: Best practices from other similar facilities Business studies Environmental studies Office and workshops Development centres Development area Main entrance and control centre Development area c Customer zone R&D campus Service zone Next-door service providers / partners Innovation Center 76 Research center High-speed CAV testing Low-speed CAV testing Status of the project Related facilities (event center, etc.) 29
Multi-level testing environment Buildings and modules Control center Workshops and offices Main entrance building Service providers Innovation Center Research center, University building Status of the project Related buildings 30
Definition of Project Phases Phase 1: 2017-2018 (70MEUR) Phase 2: 2018-2020 (70MEUR) Status of the project 31
Project Milestones and Basic data Preparations Announcement May 19, 2016 Project start fixed HSO position Sept 14, 2016 Agreement of Ministry & City Nov 04, 2016 Project preparation: Ground mechanics Geodesia Archeologic study Environmental study Ground-protection plans Ammunition discharge Parcel creation (zone plan) Feb-Apr 2017 Agreement with lead-designer Apr 19, 2017 Feb-Apr, 2017 Jun-Jul, 2016 Oct, 2016 Registration of Automotive Proving Ground Ltd. (project company) Pre-design activities: Proving Ground concept Earthwork plans Utility plans AD test zone concept Buildings concept Environmental design May 19, 2017 Groundbraking ceremony / Start of construction Publication of 292/2016 (VI.13.) and 1319/2016 (VII.1.) Governmental Decisions Status of the project 32
Project milestones and basic data VIDEO Dynamic platform May-Dec, 2017 End of Phase 1 Jun, 2018 High speed oval preparation PART I Oct, 2018 EREDETI TERVBEN: 2 ÉPÜLET Műszaki épület ~2.000 m 2 Aug, 2017-Jun, 2018 Fogadó épület ~2.000 m EREDETI TERVBEN: 2 2 ÉPÜLET Braking platform Műszaki épület ~2.000 m 2 Smart City Zone I. completition Handling course Status of the project ALTERNATÍV IRÁNY: 3 IPARI ÉPÜLET Buildings: Labor Fogadó és irodaépület main entrance, Internal roads as ~2.000 ~500 m 22 technical building, test roads control center Műszaki épület ~1.000 m 2 ALTERNATÍV IRÁNY: 3 IPARI ÉPÜLET Autószerelő műhely ~500 m 2 33
Project status Nov/2017 Status of the project 34
Project milestones and basic data PHASE 2 Smart City Zone II. High-speed oval completition 2019-2020 Additional moduls: Slopes Kick-plate Bad roads Aquaplaning Noise measurement plate Additional buildings: University Research Center Related buildings Status of the project 35
Model of operation, Services
Business & Operation Model Operation models will change Vehicle partners (OE, Tier1, ) Communication partner System partner Testing ZONE Modules (with classic services) Simulation (scenarios, cases, disturbances) Data collection (operation of sensory system) Data management (operation of cloud) Engineering Services Model of operation SERVICE CONTENT 37
Participation of the Testing Zone in the V-Model Services planned TEST PROGRAM EXECUTION USE CASE DEFINITION Platooning Connected vehicle control Special situations TEST PLANNING Model of operation 38
Product Structure Service Line A A1 Modules A2 Linked modules A3 Modul services Service Line B B1 Traffic situations (trafic elements, barriers, etc.) B2 Sensor cluster B3 Data system B4 Standard tests Service Line C C1 Smart City Zalaegerszeg tests C2 Public road tests C3 Cross boarder tests Service Line D D1 Lab infrastructure and services D2 Simulation services D3 Usecase definitions Service Line E E1 Engineering services E2 Test track infrastructure E3 Special services 39
What can be tested?
Modules to be realized with Priority 1 Priority is defined with future customers What can be tested? 41
Proving Ground Modules Dynamic platform Physical parameters: 300m diameter asphalt surface Acceleration lane 760m and 400m long 20m wide FIA emergency area Watered surface (optional) Watered basalt surface at easter acceleration lane (phase 2.) 1% inclination to south Separated return way Autonomous vehicle test cases: Platooning at free trajectory Cooperative vehicle control at high and medium mue with different trajectories (double lane change, J-turn etc.) at stability limit (ABS, ESP activity) Fix position obstacle (dummy car or pedestrian) Euro NCAP scenarios Project Phase 1 2017-2018 What can be tested? 42
Proving Ground Modules Braking platform Parameters: 6 different surfaces: Chess surface: asphalt/tiles asphalt mue=~1 (optional watering) tiles mue=~0.1 (wet) Blue basalt mue=~0.3 (wet) Treated concrete mue=~0.6 (wet) aquaplaning basin (max. 5cm wet depth) 200m surface length 750m acceleration lane 20m safety area at both side, 150m at the end Autonomous vehicle test cases: Platooning at physical limits; drive through or braking at various surfaces up to high speed Cooperative vehicle control at physical limit, moving or static obstacle, at various speeds during ABS, ATC, ESP activity Project Phase 1 2017-2018 What can be tested? 43
Proving Ground Modules Handling course Parameters: Low (60km/h) and high speed (120km/h) section 1.300m and 2000m length width: 6 and 12m 20m wide gravel covered safety zones Various topography V2X coverage for communication tests at various terrain Autonomous vehicle test cases: Platooning at medium speeds at diverse topography Cooperative vehicle control at diverse topography and limited visibility Project Phase 1 2017-2018 What can be tested? 44
Proving Ground Modules Rural road Parameters: 500m 2x2 lane motorway 2500m 2x1 lane rural road Partly watered surface 5G test network V2X communication coverage GPS base station Public road like layout (junctions, road surface, geometry) Autonomous vehicle test cases: Platooning on rural road at realistic conditions, various type of junctions, roundabouts Diverse lane layout: 2x1, 2x2, 2+1, Diverse topography Moving and static obstacles Construction site situation Various road side elements: trees, fences, grass etc. Project Phase 1 2017-2018 What can be tested? 45
Proving Ground MModules Motorway Parameters: 1500m 2 x 2+1 lane motorway 100m real tunnel Partly watered surface VMS, 5G test network V2X communication coverage GPS base station Public road like layout (junctions, road surface, geometry) Autonomous vehicle test cases: Platooning on motorway at realistic conditions, exits and entrances Platooning and cooperative control with limited communication (tunnel) Moving and static obstacles Construction site situation Multi level junction Project Phase 1 2017-2018 What can be tested? 46
Proving Ground Modules SMART City Zone Separated Function Zones 1 2 3 4 1. Low-speed, parking area 2. Multi-lane high speed area 3. Downtown area 4. Suburban area 5 5. T-junction area Project Phase 1 2017-2018 What can be tested? 47
Proving Ground Modules Smart City Zone Parking house capacity for 60 cars 3 levels: 1. level wo natural light 2. level open concrete walls 3. level: open air design local V2X network for wallet parking configurable parking place layouts Technical plans 48
Proving Ground Modules Smart City Zone Buildings Technical plans Tech 49
Proving Ground Modules Smart City Zone Special features Communication network: Full V2X communication system Environmental impact measurement opportunity (e.g. noise, EMC, rain) High speed mobile network(lte, 5G) Database about the environment External measurement infrastructure: Drone carried camera DGPS Technical plans Technical parameters: Sticky lane markings Real test vehicles Old cars for scenery, special cars Traffic gantry with variable message sign Railway crossing, construction zone, pedestrian crossings, trees, moveable road signs, tunnel,, roadside objects, various street lights, SMART City features 50
Proving Ground Modules Smart City Zone Test cases Low-speed platooning at various junctions and lane layout Emergency braking in city environment with different barriers (static, moving) on high and low friction surface Cooperative tests with vehicles, pedestrians, bikers etc. Different parking situations: parking house, valet parking, park assistant, different layouts, smart parking Intelligent logistic yard Different road construction zone scenarios in city environment Different road side objects: buildings, trees, parking cars, used road signs, fences, dust-bin etc. Changing weather conditions (rain) Technical plans 51
Proving Ground Modules Communication network 3 level approach: 1st level: ITS G5 basic V2X test enviroment 2nd level: V2X developer enviroment:freely configurable, open interface for application developers, full data logging infrstructure 3rd level: fully customer defined test environment 5G cellular test network for future ITS applications Redundant layout for paralell customer networks What can be tested? 52
Construction of Complex Test Scenarios Opportunities for the Scenario-in-the-Loop (SciL) Simulation Track Traffic Simulation Software Maneuver execution Localization Movable Objects and Disturbances Vehicle Running offboard What can be tested? 53
Construction of Complex Test Scenarios Dummys and UFO s What can be tested? 54
Leaving the Closed Testing Environment Zalaegerszeg as Smart/Digitalized City environment for Testing Test track modules and scenarios for controlled and repeatable tests in a safe environment City environment for random real-life testing What can be tested? 55
Public Road Tests Possible test sites in Zalaegerszeg What can be tested? 56
Leaving the Closed Testing Environment High speed testing in real environment Triple loop Loop_1: In citiy Local roads (City Zalaegerszeg) smart infrastruktúra Loop_2: Hungarian roads (Zalaegerszeg-Gyor-Budapest) Loop_3: International roads (Graz-Zalaegerszeg-Maribor zone) What can be tested? 57
Public Road Tests Public roads with autonomous test focus: R76, newly built Testing opportunities 58
ZALAZONE - Region Zala What do we offer? 59