Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation

Similar documents
ITEM 585 RIDE QUALITY FOR PAVEMENT SURFACES Description. Measure and evaluate the ride quality of pavement surfaces.

Table Standardized Naming Convention for ERD Files

SECTION 602 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SMOOTHNESS

PN /21/ SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS

DESCRIPTION This work consists of measuring the smoothness of the final concrete or bituminous surface.

PN 420-7/18/ SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS

MnDOT s Experience with IRI Specifications

Summary of Pavement Smoothness Specifications in Canada and Around the World

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (MEAN ROUGHNESS INDEX ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)

SECTIO N 610 PAVEMENT SMO O THNESS

An Update on Smoothness Specifications at ODOT

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (IRI ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)

DIVISION V SURFACINGS AND PAVEMENTS

CATEGORY 500 PAVING SECTION 535 PAVEMENT SURFACE PROFILE

NCDOT Rideability and IRI Special Provision. Nilesh Neel Surti, PE North Carolina DOT State Pavement Construction Engineer

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW

Section 6. Ride Specification Special Provisions Step-by-Step Ride Guide for Inspectors and Project Engineers

RUNWAY ROUGHNESS CONSIDERATIONS. SWIFT 2013 Chris Olidis, P.Eng.

Profiler Certification Process at the Virginia Smart Road

Control of Pavement Smoothness in Kansas

Field Verification of Smoothness Requirements for Weigh-In-Motion Approaches

Alberta Transportation Rumble Strips - C-TEP Lunch and Learn

Ride Smoothness Measurement and Specification Issues. Nicholas Vitillo, Ph. D. Manager, Bureau of Research New Jersey Department of Transportation

LESSONS LEARNT FROM THE MEASUREMENT OF GRAVEL ROAD ROUGHNESS IN KWAZULU-NATAL

Asphalt Technician Certification Program

Pedestrian Autonomous Emergency Braking Test Protocol (Version 1) December 2018

Fundamentals of Paving Smoothness

RUTGERS PAVEMENT RESOURCE CENTER RIDE QUALITY TOOLS

SPECIFICATION FOR SKID RESISTANCE INVESTIGATION AND TREATMENT SELECTION

THE USE OF PERFORMANCE METRICS ON THE PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE

a road is neither cheap nor fast.

SMOOTH MOVING - it's a measure of quality (1st of 3 articles) HMA = Smoothness

Request for Collision Evaluation

On Low Speed Problem in Road Smoothness Profiling. Vadim Peretroukhine Michael Nieminen. September 28,

Non-Destructive Pavement Testing at IDOT. LaDonna R. Rowden, P.E. Pavement Technology Engineer

Roadside Safety MASH

Pedestrian Autonomous Emergency Braking Test Protocol (Version II) February 2019

West Virginia Department of Transportation Division of Highways

VDOT 2008 Road and Bridge Standards Section Transition Curves

MoDOT TECHNICIAN QUALIFICATION MANUAL For PROFILOGRAPH OPERATORS. Table of Contents. Profilograph Example (Pay Calculation)

FIGURE 15. MANUAL RUT DEPTH

Access Management Standards

Date of Issue: For: County Engineer. County Road No.: Maintenance Area: Section Forman Payment Required: (Options: Cash Cheque Credit Card)

Surveys consistently show that smoothness is. Smooth Going How new technology is changing quest for smooth pavements !"#$!"#$%"$

Locating Ground Mounted Equipment

2 Min. Min. Edge of. Edgeline See Note 3 PLAN VIEW. See Note 3. This distance may vary

Stopping water truck related uncontrolled movements on mine haul roads

CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION POLICY... 3 III. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION PROCEDURE... 7 APPENDIX A... 9 APPENDIX B...

TOPAS 2130A (Draft v3)

Final Report FHWA/IN/JTRP-2003/8 EVALUATION OF INDOT CONSTRUCTION SMOOTHNESS SPECIFICATIONS

Impact of Overweight Traffic on Pavement Life Using WIM Data and Mechanistic- Empirical Pavement Analysis

Regulations responsible for

OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING

METODS OF MEASURING DISTRESS

Smoothness Specification Update

New West Partnership Deliverables July 2011/2012 Reporting

Skills and Sequences for In-Car Instruction

Canadian Motor Vehicle Traffic Collision Statistics. Collected in cooperation with the Canadian Council of Motor Transport Administrators

Pavement asset management practice for national and state highways in Bavaria

EFFECT OF PAVEMENT CONDITIONS ON FUEL CONSUMPTION, TIRE WEAR AND REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE COSTS

Development of Crash Modification Factors for Rumble Strips Treatment for Freeway Applications: Phase I Development of Safety Performance Functions

welcome to the BC Hydro community open house

2. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

Guide Rail Safety Symposium

DIRECTIONAL DRIVEWAYS AT HIGHWAYS WITHOUT CURB

Sight Distance. A fundamental principle of good design is that

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

SPEED CUSHION POLICY AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES FOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS

3. Application Fees, Certificate Of Insurance & Performance Bond

ELMORE COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT

Non-contact Deflection Measurement at High Speed

Weigh-In-Motion System for the Reduction of Commercial Vehicle Traffic Delays at the Borden-Carleton, PEI Weight Inspection Station

2 x 25 kv ac / 1 x 25 kv ac Grounding and Bonding

A Study on Correlation between International Roughness Index and Present Serviceability Rating

Guidelines for Retro-fitting Existing Roads to Optimise Safety Benefits. A Practitioners Experience and Assessment of Options for Improvement.

Round robin tests in the Netherlands

LOADS BRIDGE LOADING AND RATING. Dead Load. Types of Loads

2017 Local Roads Workshop Local Agency HMA Acceptance Specification

(2111) Digital Test Rolling REVISED 07/22/14 DO NOT REMOVE THIS. IT NEEDS TO STAY IN FOR THE CONTRACTORS. SP

BY-ELECTION SIGN GUIDELINES

JCE4600 Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering

Asphalt Pavement Construction Update

Ride vibration & road condition

Permit Type: Extended Drivers Hours of Service (Provincial)

English version of. Executive Order on vehicles' technical compatibility with the rail network (Bekendtgørelse nr af 30. november 2012) Preface

STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE AS A MINIMUM CRITERION FOR APPROACH SPACING

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

ROBUST PROJECT Norwegian Public Roads Administration / Force Technology Norway AS

Profiler Certification Program at the NCAT Pavement Test Track. R. Buzz Powell Jason Nelson

EL DORADO COUNTY REGIONAL FIRE PROTECTION STANDARD

SINGLE SIDED SAFETY BARRIER ON GROUND H2-W4-A (3n35975)

BINGHAMTON METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY

DESIGN STANDARDS SECTION DS 3 STREETS

Passenger Train Brake Inspection and Safety Rules: Guidelines for British Columbia s Heritage Railways

Ch. 157 ESTABLISHED SOUND LEVELS CHAPTER 157. ESTABLISHED SOUND LEVELS

APPENDIX A Basis of Design and Design Criteria Memorandum

EMERGENCY ACCESS POLICY

TURN AND CURVE SIGNS

DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT 200' TYPICAL SPACING (YELLOW DELINEATORS) END OF MERGE LANE TAPER DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT

DOCUMENTATION WORKBOOK FY 2017

Transcription:

Provincial Smoothness Specifications (MB, SK, AB, BC) Darel Mesher PhD, PEng November, 2012 Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation 2 1

Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation Construction Smoothness Specification Profile Index NULL (0mm) blanking band Unit distance of 100m (mm/0.1km) Profile readings are excluded near bridge decks, railway crossing, and existing pavement joints Final pavement profiles for inner and outer wheel path in each lane. PI calculations shall be based on the wheel path with the roughest values. PI measured by the Department using an inertial profiler measuring device capable of simulating a profilograph (AASHTO M328 compliant). Working on certification standards for operators and equipment based on AASHTO M328, R54, R56 and R57. 3 Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation PROFILE INDEX (0 NULL BAND) SPEC RANGE (mm/100m) Single Lift Multiple Lift <18 $400 $400 18 22 $180 $180 23 27 $120 $120 28 34 $60 $60 35 40 $0 $0 41 46 $45 $90 47 52 $90 $180 53 62 $150 $300 >62 CORRECT CORRECT Repairs within any 100m section will disqualify the section from bonus assessment. Negative pay adjustments waived if: curves < 600m radius curb or curb and gutter concrete barrier walls BUMPS (7.6m Staight Edge) SPEC RANGE Single Lift Multiple Lift >8mm 12mm 150 300 >12mm CORRECT CORRECT Grinding accepted as corrective action. 4 2

Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation PI measured by the Department using an inertial profiler (AASHTO M328 compliant), post-processed to simulate a profilograph. Working on certification standards for operators and equipment based on AASHTO M328, R54, R56 and R57. Use IRI for Asset Management purposes, in the preliminary stages of investigating the use of IRI for construction acceptance. Recognise the benefit of having a cradle to grave system for measurement, work with our industry partners while MTI develops a full understanding of the implications in the use of the IRI as an acceptance tool 5 Ministry of Highways and Infrastructure 6 3

Ministry of Highways and Infrastructure Construction Smoothness Specification Profile Index 5mm blanking band Block distance of 100m (mm/0.1km) Category II PrI applies to the following circumstances: Curves with radius less than 600 m; Blocks within 50 m of a bridge or railway crossing; Single lift rehabilitation projects where the total thickness of asphalt concrete being placed is 50 mm or less, with the exception of profiled-milled sections; Areas where there is curb and gutter; and The block at each construction limit. Category I PrI for all other cases 7 Ministry of Highways and Infrastructure Each Block profiled in accordance with STP 222-5 Roughness Profile with High Speed Profilograph (inertial profiler and profilograph simulation) Profile Index measured in OWP, 5mm blanking band. 100 m Block Size The bump or dip measured over a 7.6 m section. Odometer Calibration: +/- 1%; Sensor Vertical Height; verified using calibrated using calibration blocks. Accelerometer; bounce acceleration calibration done every day. 8 4

Ministry of Highways and Infrastructure Smoothness Specifications PRI Range Pay Adjustment Multiple Lift, Single Lift > 50mm Single Lift =< 50mm, Curves (R<600m), Curb and Gutter Top Lift 100m Sub Lot 0 0 1 $200 1 2 2 3 $150 3 4 4 6 $100 5 6 7 9 $50 7 10 10 15 $0 11 12 16 17 $25 13 18 $50 14 19 $75 15 20 $100 16 21 $150 17 22 $200 18 23 $300 19 24 $400 20 25 $500 21 26 $600 22 27 $800 23 28 $1,000 > 23 > 28 Reject Individual bumps and/or dips of 12 mm or less are considered a part of smoothness. 9 Ministry of Highways and Infrastructure Bump Specification Bump / Dip Pay Adjustment ($ per bump or dip) 8.5 to 9.4 mm $100 9.5 to 10.4 mm $200 10.5 to 11.4 mm $400 11.5 to 12.4 mm $600 12.5 to 13.4 mm $800 13.5 to 14.4 mm $1,000 14.5 to 15.4 mm $1,200 15.5 to 16.4 mm $1,400 16.5 to 17.4 mm $1,600 17.5 to 18.4 mm $1,800 > 18.4 mm Reject Contractor will be allowed to perform a Class I or Class IV repair on individual bumps and dips that exceed 12 mm. 10 5

Alberta Transportation 11 Alberta Transportation AT Current Construction Smoothness Specification Profile Index 5.8mm blanking band Sub-Lot distance of 100m (mm/0.1km) Construction type criteria Multi-lift, single lift, curb and gutter. Bump and Dip assessment (7.62 m baseline) $300 per B/D for multi-lift $100 per B/D for single lift 2010, first use of high speed inertial profilers to provide simulated profilograph measurements. 6

Alberta Transportation Finalizing new specification using inertial profilers and IRI criteria. Begin implementation in 2013. Initial projects to be tendered shortly. Similar in nature to current end product specification. IRI determined on a 100 m sublot basis. Attempt to have similar boundary limits for bonus, penalty and reject. Areas of Localized Roughness IRI determined in the right wheel path over a 7.62 m baseline. Contractor to provide testing services. Department has option to perform verification testing. Alberta Transportation Smoothness Specification Lot PrI Two or more lifts, 20mm Payment Adjustment Single lift, 45mm HIP, Mill and Inlay, Curb and Gutter or Single Lift < 45 10 0 0 0 11-40 0 0 12-70 0 0 13-100 0 0 14-130 0 0 15-170 0 0 16-200 -40 0 17-230 -80 0 18-260 -120 0 19-290 -160 0 20-320 -200 0 21-350 -240 0 22-380 -280 0 23-410 -320-10 24 REJECT REJECT -40 25 REJECT REJECT -70 26 REJECT REJECT -100 27 REJECT REJECT -130 28 REJECT REJECT -160 29 REJECT REJECT -190 30 REJECT REJECT -220 > 30 REJECT REJECT REJECT 14 7

British Columbia Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure 15 British Columbia Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure BC Construction Smoothness Specification IRI Sub-Lot of 100m Smoothness tested by the Ministry Class I precision rolling profile measuring instrument High Speed Inertial Profilers added 2010 Pavement profile measured in the center of each driving lane. Acceleration, deceleration and turning lanes are tested Structures and shoulder areas excluded Contractor provides a chalk a guideline in the centre of the lane immediately prior to measurement. 16 8

British Columbia Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure Smoothness Specification Lot IRI (m/km) Payment Adjustment Standard Alternate 0.80 $2,000 $2,000 > 0.80 to. 0.90 $1,000 $2,000 > 0.90 to. 1.00 $500 $2,000 > 1.00 to. 1.10 $200 $1,000 > 1.10 to. 1.20 $0 $500 > 1.20 to. 1.30 $100 $250 > 1.30 to. 1.40 $250 $0 > 1.40 to. 1.50 $600 $300 > 1.50 to. 1.60 $1,400 $300 > 1.60 to. 1.70 $2,000 $750 > 1.70 to. 1.80 $3,000 $750 > 1.80 to. 1.90 REJECT $1,500 > 1.90 to. 2.00 REJECT $2,500 > 2.00 REJECT REJECT Bumps And Dips Individual deficiencies between 8 mm and 12 mm over 3 m will result in a $200.00 penalty for each occurrence. Less than 12 mm over 3 m will not have remedial work required. Deficiencies exceeding 12 mm over 3 m will require remedial work. 17 Construction EPS Smoothness Index 18 9