Test Report No

Similar documents
INFLUENCE OF CROSS FORCES AND BENDING MOMENTS ON REFERENCE TORQUE SENSORS FOR TORQUE WRENCH CALIBRATION

Full extension concealed slide with soft closing and self-closing

Field test for the comparison of LNG static and dynamic mass measurement methods

PERFORMANCE OF THE NEW PRIMARY TORQUE STANDARD MACHINE OF INMETRO, BRAZIL

BMW of North America, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of. AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),

OPTIMISING CHASSIS ALIGNMENT USING VEHICLE SENSORS

DÜRR NDT GmbH & CO. KG Höpfigheimer Straße Bietigheim-Bissingen

Principle Decision by the Central Experience Exchange Circle of the Notified Bodies and the GS Bodies according to the Product Safety Act ZEK

Worcester Public Schools Student Transportation Contract Proposed Bid Specification Change Summary Sheet

Annex to the Accreditation Certificate D-PL according to DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005

LEAKAGE CLASS ACHIEVED? Wöhler DP 700 LEAKAGE TEST ON VENTILATION SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS. The Measure of Technology GRAPHIC COLOR DISPLAY GRAPHIC

CRITERIA FOR LABORATORY ACCREDITATION IN THE FIELD OF TORQUE METROLOGY (Torque Generating Device Calibration)

British Gas Comments and Questions on Kelton Engineering Draft SMER

Department of Transportation. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. [Docket No. NHTSA ; Notice 2]

Influence of mounting tube diameter on anemometer output

Vibration damping precision couplings

CarePacs. Traceable Balance Testing for Secure Weighing Processes

Laboratory Methods for Testing Actuators

TROUBLESHOOTING TP. Index

Contact person Date Reference Page Hans Eriksson F000838D 1 (3) Wood Technology

600 Amp Surge Arrester

Safety Assessment & Approval System of Shanghai Maglev Demonstration Line and its Practice

Sound-absorbing spacer Sorp10

MicroGuard 586 Retrofit Rated Capacity Indicator System. Calibration and Testing for:

Optimum design of nozzles tribology systems of a diesel engine fuel injector with high values of rail pressure

Intercomparison Between Trapil, France and NEL, UK Using Oil Flow Turbine Meters

Slide Measuring Instrument GMG 200

Laboratory Report. U. S. Department of Justice

Confirmation: / 22 March 2013

Introduction: Supplied to 360 Test Labs... Battery packs as follows:

Electric Vehicle Charging Station Incentives PROGRAM HANDBOOK

ENERCON GmbH ENERCON E-66. page 1 of 6. Design. Dreekamp 5 Tel.: / Aurich Fax: / Design

This test report describes the test results of the below mentioned paragliding harness. Ozone Gliders Exoceat Medium 7.

SKN_N0106AnnexJ_R2. Annex J - Specific requirements for PVT collector Certification. 1. Introduction and definition

Testing of particulate emissions from positive ignition vehicles with direct fuel injection system. Technical Report

Performance of Batteries in Grid Connected Energy Storage Systems. June 2018

Test report P E. J. Magner Dipl.-Ing. (FH) N. Machill

July 10, Refer to: HSA-10/CC-78A

KWA. Evaluation of the Vaporless Manufacturing LD 3000 and LD 3000S Mechanical Line Leak Detector on Large Rigid and Flexible Pipelines.

This test report describes the test results of the below mentioned paragliding harness.

VITLAB Dispenser. Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

DRIVING STABILITY OF A VEHICLE WITH HIGH CENTRE OF GRAVITY DURING ROAD TESTS ON A CIRCULAR PATH AND SINGLE LANE-CHANGE

Translation of the Original operating instructions Lifting device Z 70 /...

Test report. About the effect of Lambda System Cleaning Products. No

Evidence of performance Reduction of impact sound pressure level by floor coverings

This test report describes the test results of the below mentioned paragliding harness. SUPAIR - VLD Delight 2 Medium 2.5 kg 120 kg Foam 15 cm ABS

SAE Baja - Drivetrain

KISSsoft Case Study on Gearing Optimization with the "Gearbox Variant Generator" KISSsoft Case Study on Gearing Optimization with the

Study of the Performance of a Driver-vehicle System for Changing the Steering Characteristics of a Vehicle

This test report describes the test results of the below mentioned paragliding harness. Ozone Gliders Ozium Medium 1.

Original. M. Pang-Ngam 1, N. Soponpongpipat 1. Keywords: Optimum pipe diameter, Total cost, Engineering economic

Transport System. Telematics. Functioning of Digital Tachograph System in Country of UE

CSC Transportation LLC Job Description Semi Tractor-Trailer Driver

Tester for Motor-Driven Relays Type Siemens SICO 1225 M A N U A L

This test report describes the test results of the below mentioned paragliding harness. Sup'Air Evo XC 3 Large 4.2 kg 120 kg Mousse bag ABS

MEASURING CUSTOMER COMFORT OF THE SIDE DOOR SELF-EQUIPMENT FOR THE AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY

Concrete (63) PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM REPORT

Development of Relief Valve Automatic assembly technology

Operating Instructions Precision balance

Excursion 2015 nach Heilbronn

Contact person Date Reference Page Hans Eriksson F000838G 1 (4) Wood Technology

A company of ThyssenKrupp Elevator. ThyssenKrupp Aufzugswerke. Operating Manual. Oil buffer

CALIBRATION SERVICES HUMIDITY DEW POINT AIR VELOCITY MASS FLOW TEMPERATURE PRESSURE

Operating Manual TWN 0121/1. Lifting point, screw-type TWN 0122 TWN 0123 TWN 0127 TWN 1120 TWN 1830 TWN 1890

Ch. 169 DIESEL SMOKE MEASUREMENT CHAPTER 169. DIESEL SMOKE MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE

This test report describes the test results of the below mentioned paragliding harness. Sup'Air Kinder S 2.1 kg 100 kg ABS

Three-phase motors for marine use

SFI SPECIFICATION 35.2 EFFECTIVE: DECEMBER 29, 2014 *

OFS Brands Test Facility Report No: OFSB Date: April 2, 2015 Page: 1 of 29. Test Report For: ANSI/BIFMA X Storage Units.

DER Commissioning Guidelines Community Scale PV Generation Interconnected Using Xcel Energy s Minnesota Section 10 Tariff Version 1.

Test report No

Test Based Optimization and Evaluation of Energy Efficient Driving Behavior for Electric Vehicles

SUMMARY. St-jean-sur-richelieu, January 15th 2016 Client: America s heat Project: PI-20114

Product Loss During Retail Motor Fuel Dispenser Inspection

Worker Crushed by Vessel Date of Incident: August 3, 2007 Type of Incident: Fatal

Test report No

TEST REPORT. No. 284a/14

Test report no

The stability tests that are described below are performed according to and with compliance with 2

This test report describes the test results of the below mentioned paragliding harness. SUP'AIR Walibi 2 Medium 3.3 kg 100 kg Air bag ABS

Inspection Report. Coating name: IGP HWFclassic IGP Pulvertechnik AG Industrie Stelz, Ringstraße Wil Schweiz. Job number:

Robots. KUKA Roboter GmbH. LBR iiwa. LBR iiwa 7 R800, LBR iiwa 14 R820 Specification. LBR iiwa. Issued: Version: Spez LBR iiwa V7

Report Test Report

Charging of HOPPECKE OPzV solar.power battery in Solar Applications

Influential Criteria on the Optimization of a Gearbox, with Application to an Automatic Transmission

White paper: Pneumatics or electrics important criteria when choosing technology

Dispensette. Testing Instructions (SOP) 1. Introduction. May 2009

Assessment of Elevator and Escalator Maintenance & Repair Program Final Elevator Audit Submission Foggy Bottom Station - Escalator C04X03 (Entrance)

GMD 13 New gravimetric measuring system with evaluation on location

Demonstration with optical fibres by Smart Fibres Ltd. Task 15

Test of the validity of RVS-technology gel

This test report describes the test results of the below mentioned paragliding harness.

Case Study Involving Surface Durability and Improved Surface Finish

ME201 Project: Backing Up a Trailer Using Vector Analysis

A New verification system of mobile scales

Steering Actuator for Autonomous Driving and Platooning *1

Electric Vehicle Charging Safety Guidelines Part 2: Selection and Installation Edition DRAFT

This test report describes the test results of the below mentioned paragliding harness. Dudek Paragliders Pogo 2 Medium 5.

Report Turbine inspection WTG 12801, Oudelandertocht 11

PVP Field Calibration and Accuracy of Torque Wrenches. Proceedings of ASME PVP ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference PVP2011-

Transcription:

Empa Überlandstrasse 129 CH-8600 Dübendorf Tel. +41 (0)44 823 55 11 Fax +41 (0)1 821 62 44 www.empa.ch Materials Science & Technology Lista AG Betriebs- und Lagereinrichtungen CH-8586 Erlen Test Report No. 450922 Test Assignment: Check of Standard Conformity of Slide Tests Test Object: Client Ref.: Summary Fulterer GesmbH slides (FR7180.650-504 and FR7075.650-504B) according to Lista AG specifications (Customer) Mr. A. Amacker Order dated of: September 22/2008 Test Object received: - Test performed: September November 2008 Number of Pages: 33 Dispatch: Dispatch: Archive: - None 3 Copies to Customer The company Fulterer GesmbH (A-6890 Lustenau) manufactures drawer slides and tests them in its own laboratory according to DIN 68858 and RAL-RG 614/8 standards. The goal of this order was to be on hand to inspect the testing equipment and test procedures in the testing of two types of slides (load capacity of 200 kg and 75 kg), and to check whether the tests conform to the standards mentioned. The following determination can be made: The selected tests were carried out correctly using suitable testing equipment. The slides tested have passed the tests performed on them. The testing method used is not within the scope of the accreditation. However, all testing activities are subject to the Empa quality management system in any case. Dübendorf, 12/03/2008 Project manager: Dr. G. Piskoty Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research Lab. Mechanical Systems Engineering Head of Laboratory representative: Dr. G. Kovacs Remark: The test results are valid solely for the object tested. The use of the test reports for the purpose of publicity, the mere reference to them or publication of excerpts require the approval of the Empa (see Information Note). Test reports and supporting documents are retained for 10 years.

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 2 von 33 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Goal...5 2 TIMING AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE...5 3 CHECK OF LOADS ON THE SLIDES...5 3.1 Weight Check of Load-Sacks...5 3.2 Drawer Weight Check...7 4 INVESTIGATIONS...8 4.1 Durability tests according to RAL-RG 614/8, Section 8-3.4.6...8 4.1.1 Test equipment...8 4.1.2 Test of slide FR7180.650-504 (nominal load 200 kg)...9 4.1.3 Test of slide FR7075.650-504B (nominal load 75 kg)...9 4.2 Test of the Deflection of the Front of the Drawer during the Durability Test according to DIN 68858, Section 6.1.5...10 4.2.1 Test method...10 4.2.2 Test of slide FR7180.650-504 (nominal load 200 kg)...10 4.2.3 Test of slide FR7075.650-504B (nominal load 75 kg)...10 4.3 Test of Opening Force according to DIN 68858, Section 6.1.5...11 4.3.1 Test method...11 4.3.2 Test of slide FR7180.650-504 (nominal load 200 kg)...13 4.3.3 Test of slide FR7075.650-504B (nominal load 75 kg)...13 4.4 Test of Closing Force according to DIN 68858, Section 6.1.5...14 4.4.1 Test method...14 4.4.2 Test of slide FR7180.650-504 (nominal load 200 kg)...15 4.4.3 Test of slide FR7075.650-504B (nominal load 75 kg)...16 4.5 Vertical Load Test according to DIN 68858, Section 7.8...17 4.5.1 Test method...17 4.5.2 Test of slide FR7180.650-504 (load capacity 200 kg)...18 4.5.3 Test of slide FR7075.650-504B (load capacity 75 kg)...18 4.6 Horizontal Load Test according to DIN 68858, Section 7.9...19 4.6.1 Test method...19 4.6.2 Test of slide FR7180.650-504 (load capacity 200 kg)...20 4.6.3 Test of slide FR7075.650-504B (load capacity 75 kg)...20 4.7 Test of Pull-Out Retention according to RAL-RG 614/8, Section 8-3.4.6...21 4.7.1 Test setup...21 4.7.2 Test of slide FR7180.650-504 (load capacity 200 kg)...22 4.7.3 Test of slide FR7075.650-504B (load capacity 75 kg)...23

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 3 von 33 5 Summary...24 6 List of sources...24 7 Test protocols pf the Fulterer GesmbH...25 7.1 Test protocol 08-099D...25 7.2 Test protocol 08-102D...27 7.3 Test protocol 08-100A...29 7.4 Test protocol 08-103A...32

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 4 von 33 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Weight measurement of a randomly selected blue steel bead sack on a Mettler TE 30 J scale (property of Empa, Log. No. 121-25.005)... 6 Figure 2 Measurement of the weight of drawer 08-100A on a Mettler TE 30 J scale (Empa Log. No. 121-25.005)... 7 Figure 3: Drawer tester at testing laboratory of Fulterer GesmbH... 8 Figure 4: Screen display of controlling computer of the drawer tester... 8 Figure 5: Measurement of the height and drop of the front of the drawer using a height gauge (recorded after 300 cycles of the durability test on slide FR7180.650-504)... 10 Figure 6: Measurement of opening force for a loaded drawer (recorded on Sep. 22, 2008 after about 300 cycles of the durability test of slide FR7180.650-504)... 11 Figure 7: Check of spring scale using an attached steel cylinder of 21.41 kg (recorded on Sep. 26, 2008)... 12 Figure 8: Weight measurement of steel cylinder including connector used to check the spring scale (scale: Mettler TE 30 J, Empa Log. No. 121-25.005, Display: 21.41 kg)... 12 Figure 9: Set-up for the measurement of closing force for a loaded drawer (pictures obtained from the Fulterer GesmbH)... 14 Figure 10: Measurement of closing force for a loaded drawer (pictures obtained from the Fulterer GesmbH)... 15 Figure 11: Measurement of closing force for a loaded drawer (pictures obtained from the Fulterer GesmbH)... 16 Figure 12: Vertical load of the drawer in test of slide FR7180.650-504 (load capacity 200 kg)... 17 Figure 13: Weight measurement of steel cylinder on Mettler TE 30 J scale (Empa Log. No. 121-25.005)... 18 Figure 14: Weight measurement of steel cylinder on Mettler TE 30 J scale (Empa Log. No. 121-25.005)... 19 Figure 15: Horizontal load of the drawer in test of slide FR7180.650-504 (load capacity 200 kg), recorded on Sep. 22, 2008... 19 Figure 16: Photo during the impact test of slide FR7180.650-504 on Sep. 22, 2008 (drawer loaded with 9 sacks, each with a nominal mass of 5 kg, total load on slides: approx. 53 kg)... 21 Figure 17: Check of inclination during impact tests using a digital inclinometer (Empa LogNo.125-40.270, resolution 0.1º)... 22 Figure 18: Slight impact traces at stop of slide FR7180.650-504 after three impact test series with 10 impacts per series... 22 Figure 19: Recorded during the impact test of slide FR7075.650-504B (loading of the drawer with 9 sacks, each with a nominal mass of 5 kg; total load on the slides: approx. 53 kg)... 23 Figure 20: Slight impact traces at stop of slide FR7075.650-504B after two impact test series with 10 impacts per series... 23 Archiving of Figures: The figures of this document are clearly defined by the project number and figure number.

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 5 von 33 1 GOAL The company Fulterer GesmbH (A-6890 Lustenau) manufactures drawer slides that are installed in drawer cabinets made by the client and by others (Lista AG). The drawer slides are tested by Fulterer in its own laboratory according to DIN 68858 and RAL-RG 614/8 standards. The goal of this order was to be on hand to inspect the testing equipment and test procedures in the testing of two types of slides (load capacity of 200 kg and 75 kg), and to check whether the tests conform to the standards mentioned. The tests to be performed were agreed upon between Lista AG and Fulterer GesmbH. Remark: This report bases on the same tests reported in the Empa Test Report No. 450516, completed with documentation of additional tests. 2 TIMING AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE The tests took place from September 2008 through November 2008. The Empa project manager was present - in consultation with the client and with Fulterer GesmbH -on the afternoon of Sep. 22, 2008 (initial stage of the tests) and the morning of Sep. 26, 2008 (conclusion of the tests) on site in Lustenau. The test specimens (tested slides) and the equipment and aids (such as sacks with which to load the drawers) belong to Fulterer GesmbH and were selected by the company. Empa project managers only brought along measurement devices that were used for the purposes of checking (scale, declinometer and gauge). 3 CHECK OF LOADS ON THE SLIDES 3.1 Weight Check of Load-Sacks In DIN Standard 68858, Section 2 specifies the use of sacks filled with glass beads as a load on the drawers; each sack should weigh 1 kg. For impact testing, a single loosely filled sack that is approximately e- qual in size to the size of the drawer is prescribed. In the tests carried out (Chap. 4), the drawers were loaded with sacks that had been filled with steel beads. The sacks had different nominal weights according to color: green: m g = 2.5kg red: m r = 5kg blue: m b = 10 kg The effective mass of the sacks were checked on Sep. 26, 2008; 3 sacks were selected at random (Figure 1). It has been shown that all sacks that were checked are slightly heavier than their nominal weight (Table 1). This is a deviation in a conservative direction.

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 6 von 33 Figure 1: Weight measurement of a randomly selected blue steel bead sack on a Mettler TE 30 J scale (property of Empa, Log. No. 121-25.005) Sack color Nominal weight [kg] Measured value [kg] Nr. 1 Nr. 2 Nr. 3 Mean value [kg] Deviation from nominal weight [%] blue 10 10.12 10.08 10.12 10.11 +1.1 red 5 5.12 5.14 5.14 5.13 +2.7 green 2.5 2.60 2.56 2.56 2.57 +2.9 Table 1: Measured weight of randomly selected sacks

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 7 von 33 3.2 Drawer Weight Check In loading the slides, the dead weight of the drawers was also included at 5 kg. The effective mass of the drawers used in the tests was measured on Sep. 26, 2008 (Figure 2). What was seen was that both drawers had a weight of ms = 7.18 kg Thus, the effective weight of the slides was greater than assumed due to the dead weight of the drawer. This is a deviation in a conservative direction. Figure 2 Measurement of the weight of drawer 08-100A on a Mettler TE 30 J scale (Empa Log. No. 121-25.005)

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 8 von 33 4 INVESTIGATIONS Below, the individual investigations are described, grouped according to type of investigation. The standard requirements are not described in detail. They can be found directly from the standards mentioned. 4.1 Durability tests according to RAL-RG 614/8, Section 8-3.4.6 4.1.1 Test equipment The tests were carried out at the computer-controlled testing facility of Fulterer GesmbH (Figure 3 and Figure 4). A check of the facility showed that it is suitable for correctly executing the durability safety test tests according to RAL-RG 614/8. Figure 3: Drawer tester at testing laboratory of Fulterer GesmbH a) Overview mode b) Overview mode Figure 4: Screen display of controlling computer of the drawer tester

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 9 von 33 4.1.2 Test of slide FR7180.650-504 (nominal load 200 kg) When the Empa project manager arrived on Sep. 22, 2008, the test was already under way. According to the screen display of the controlling computer, about 300 cycles were already completed. The test velocity setting for closing and opening was less than the value of 0.25 m/s determined in DIN Standard 68858 under Section 7.12. This value was corrected by Mr. Raid (Fulterer GesmbH) to match the standard specification. Although the influence of the velocity deviation during the first 300 cycles had little to no nominal effect on the test results, the controls of the test equipment were adjusted by Mr. Raid and the test was run for another 5000 cycles (full test scope according to RAL-RG 614/8, Section 8-3.4.6). The Empa project manager was present at the start of the further 5000 cycles. The majority of the test proceeded automatically, under the supervision of Mr. Raid. After the completion of the total of 5300 cycles (5000 cycles of which were run at the correct velocity), the slides were checked by Mr. Raid. The test log issued by Fulterer GesmbH can be found in Chap. 7.1. According to this log, the slides passed the test. 4.1.3 Test of slide FR7075.650-504B (nominal load 75 kg) The test proceeded fully automatically under the supervision of employees of Fulterer GesmbH. The test log issued by Fulterer GesmbH can be found in Chap. 7.2. According to this log, the slides passed the test.

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 10 von 33 4.2 Test of the Deflection of the Front of the Drawer during the Durability Test according to DIN 68858, Section 6.1.5 4.2.1 Test method On Sep. 22, 2008, the drawer front deflection measurement procedure was demonstrated by Mr. Raid for the Empa project manager. The measurement was done using a Height gauge of Fulterer GesmbH (registered from the Quality Assurance department of Fulterer GesmbH) in proper fashion (Figure 1). Height gauge Figure 5: Measurement of the height and drop of the front of the drawer using a height gauge (recorded after 300 cycles of the durability test on slide FR7180.650-504) 4.2.2 Test of slide FR7180.650-504 (nominal load 200 kg) According to information from Mr. Corona (Fulterer GesmbH), all logged height measurements were done in the same fashion as the measurement demonstrated by Mr. Raid on Sep. 22, 2008 (Fig 5). The measured values can be found in Chap. 7.1. According to this, the drop was 21.2 mm. This measured value is smaller than the allowable maximum value, which is defined in the standard as 4% of the slide path (0.04 x 630 mm = 25.2 mm). Thus, it can be determined that the slide met the requirements of the standard. 4.2.3 Test of slide FR7075.650-504B (nominal load 75 kg) According to information from Mr. Corona, all logged height measurements were done in the same fashion as the measurement demonstrated by Mr. Raid on Sep. 22, 2008. (Figure 5). The measured values can be found in Chap. 7.2. According to this, the drop was 15.0 mm. This measured value is smaller than the allowable maximum value, which is defined in the standard as 4% of the slide path (0.04 x 630 mm = 25.2 mm). Thus, it can be determined that the slide met the requirements of the standard.

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 11 von 33 4.3 Test of Opening Force according to DIN 68858, Section 6.1.5 4.3.1 Test method On Sep. 22, 2008, the opening force measurement procedure was demonstrated by Mr. Raid for the Empa project manager. The measurement was done using a spring scale of Fulterer GesmbH (obtained from the Quality Assurance department under number QS 01167) in correct fashion (Figure 6). Front of drawer Motion Spring scale Figure 6: Measurement of opening force for a loaded drawer (recorded on Sep. 22, 2008 after about 300 cycles of the durability test of slide FR7180.650-504) The precision of the spring scale was checked by hanging a steel cylinder with a know weight from it (Figure 7 and Figure 8). This check showed that the precision of the spring scale was sufficient.

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 12 von 33 Spring scale Display: 21.6+/- 0.1 kg m = 21.41 kg, see Figure 8 Figure 7: Check of spring scale using an attached steel cylinder of 21.41 kg (recorded on Sep. 26, 2008) Figure 8: Weight measurement of steel cylinder including connector used to check the spring scale (scale: Mettler TE 30 J, Empa Log. No. 121-25.005, Display: 21.41 kg)

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 13 von 33 4.3.2 Test of slide FR7180.650-504 (nominal load 200 kg) According to information from Mr. Corona all slide force measurements were made in the same fashion as was demonstrated on Sep. 22, 2008. The corresponding measured values are listed in Chap. 7.1. According to this, the maximum opening force was 90 ± 10 N. In the standard, the maximum allowable opening force is only indicated for a slide path of up to 500 mm and test load of 100 kg, indicated as 12.5% of the test load. For the existing slide path of 630 mm, according to DIN 68858 special agreements will have to be made. Conservatively, one can assume a limit of 0.125 x 100 kg x 9.81 m/s 2 125 N. This value is higher than the measured opening force. Consequently, the slide passed the test. 4.3.3 Test of slide FR7075.650-504B (nominal load 75 kg) According to information from Mr. Corona all slide force measurements were made in the same fashion as was demonstrated on Sep. 22, 2008. The corresponding measured values are listed in Chap. 7.2. According to this, the maximum opening force was 50 ± 10 N. In the standard, the maximum allowable opening force is only indicated for a slide path of up to 500 mm and test load of 100 kg, indicated as 12.5% of the test load. For the existing slide path of 630 mm, according to DIN 68858 special agreements will have to be made. Conservatively, one can assume a limit of 0.125 x 75 kg x 9.81 m/s 2 93 N. This value is higher than the measured opening force. Consequently, the slide passed the test.

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 14 von 33 4.4 Test of Closing Force according to DIN 68858, Section 6.1.5 4.4.1 Test method The tests were performed by the Fulterer GesmbH, using the same spring scale as for the Opening-tests. Based on the photo documentation of the tests, obtained from Fulterer GesmbH on December 02, 2008, the tests were performed in correct fashion (Figure 9). deflection pulley Testaufbau Bild 2.jpg Spring scale Spring scale Testaufbau Bild 1.jpg a) view before mounting the drawer a) view after mounting the drawer Figure 9: Set-up for the measurement of closing force for a loaded drawer (pictures obtained from the Fulterer GesmbH)

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 15 von 33 4.4.2 Test of slide FR7180.650-504 (nominal load 200 kg) The closing test was performed before and after the long term test (Chapter 4.1) on loaded drawer (200kg). The measured values are listed in Chap. 7.1. According to this, the maximum closing force amounted to: 220 N ± 10 N before the long term test (Figure 10/a) 240 N ± 10 N after the long term test (Figure 10/b) In the standard, the maximum allowable closing force is only indicated for a slide path of up to 500 mm and test load of 100 kg, indicated as 12.5% of the test load. For the existing slide path of 630 mm, according to DIN 68858 special agreements will have to be made. One can assume a limit of 0.125 x 200 kg x 9.81 m/s 2 250 N. This value is higher than the measured closing forces. Consequently, the slide passed the test. FR7180 im Neuzustand.jpg FR7180 nach Dauertest 08-099D.jpg a) before the long term test b) before and after the long term test Figure 10: Measurement of closing force for a loaded drawer (pictures obtained from the Fulterer GesmbH)

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 16 von 33 4.4.3 Test of slide FR7075.650-504B (nominal load 75 kg) The closing test was performed before and after the long term test (Chapter 4.1) on loaded drawer (75 kg). The measured values are listed in Chap. 7.2. According to this, the maximum closing force amounted to: 60 N ± 10 N before the long term test (Figure 11/a) 70 N ± 10 N after the long term test (Figure 11/b) In the standard, the maximum allowable closing force is only indicated for a slide path of up to 500 mm and test load of 100 kg, indicated as 12.5% of the test load. For the existing slide path of 630 mm, according to DIN 68858 special agreements will have to be made. One can assume a limit of 0.125 x 75 kg x 9.81 m/s 2 93.75 N. This value is higher than the measured closing forces. Consequently, the slide passed the test. FR7075 im Neuzustand.jpg FR7075 nach Dauertest 08-102D.jpg a) before the long term test b) before and after the long term test Figure 11: Measurement of closing force for a loaded drawer (pictures obtained from the Fulterer GesmbH)

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 17 von 33 4.5 Vertical Load Test according to DIN 68858, Section 7.8 4.5.1 Test method According to standard specifications, the forward edge of the fully loaded drawer must be subjected to a force of 200 N. In the tests, the load was produced using a weight of a steel cylinder (Figure 12). The mass of the steel cylinder was 21.26 kg (Figure 13). This put the effective load of the drawer at about 6% higher than the standard value (deviation in the conservative direction). The length of the slide was set using a tape measure. The correct position of the steel weight on the edge of the drawer was marked with a felt marker. The load duration of 5 seconds each and the pause duration of 15 seconds each were controlled using the second hand of a wristwatch. F 210 N 50 mm Figure 12: Vertical load of the drawer in test of slide FR7180.650-504 (load capacity 200 kg)

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 18 von 33 Figure 13: Weight measurement of steel cylinder on Mettler TE 30 J scale (Empa Log. No. 121-25.005) 4.5.2 Test of slide FR7180.650-504 (load capacity 200 kg) The test was carried out on Sep. 22, 2008 prior to the restart of the durability test after the first 300 cycles in the presence of the Empa project manager (Figure 12) and on Sep. 23, 2008 following the durability test. After the tests were completed, no damages were found on the slides, and they were fully functional. Thus, the they passed the test. The corresponding test log can be found in Chap. 7.1. 4.5.3 Test of slide FR7075.650-504B (load capacity 75 kg) The test was carried out on Sep. 23, 2008 prior to the start of the durability test and on Sep. 24, 2008 following the durability test. According to information from Mr. Corona, the tests were carried out the same way as for slide type FR7075.650-504B. After the tests, no damages were found on the slides and they were fully functional. Thus, the they passed the test. The corresponding test log can be found in Chap. 7.2.

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 19 von 33 4.6 Horizontal Load Test according to DIN 68858, Section 7.9 4.6.1 Test method According to standard specifications, the test must be done with a force of 75 N. In the tests, the load was produced using a weight of a steel cylinder. The mass of the steel cylinder was 8.84 kg (Figure 14). Figure 14: Weight measurement of steel cylinder on Mettler TE 30 J scale (Empa Log. No. 121-25.005) The steel cylinder was suspended from a thin, flexible steel cord and connected to the front of the drawer through a frictionless rotating guide pulley (Figure 15). The load duration of 5 seconds each and the pause duration of 15 seconds each were controlled using the second hand of a wristwatch. The lateral shift of the front of the drawer was tracked visually. hook for force application Guide pulley F 88 N Cord Steel cylinder m = 8.84 kg Figure 15: Horizontal load of the drawer in test of slide FR7180.650-504 (load capacity 200 kg), recorded on Sep. 22, 2008

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 20 von 33 4.6.2 Test of slide FR7180.650-504 (load capacity 200 kg) The test was carried out on Sep. 22, 2008 prior to the restart of the durability test after the first 300 cycles in the presence of the Empa project manager (Figure 12) and on Sep. 23, 2008 following the durability test. After the test, the slides exhibited no damages and were fully functional. The lateral shift of the front of the drawer was negligible. Thus, the slides passed the test. The corresponding test log can be found in Chap. 7.1. 4.6.3 Test of slide FR7075.650-504B (load capacity 75 kg) The test was carried out on Sep. 23, 2008 prior to the start of the durability test and on Sep. 24, 2008 following the durability test. According to information from Mr. Corona, the tests were carried out in the same way as for slide type FR7075.650-504B. After the tests, the slides exhibited no damages and were fully functional. The lateral shift of the front of the drawer was negligible. Thus, the slides passed the test. The corresponding test log can be found in Chap. 7.2.

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 21 von 33 4.7 Test of Pull-Out Retention according to RAL-RG 614/8, Section 8-3.4.6 4.7.1 Test setup The test setup is shown in Figure 16. Cabinet, fixed in the tilted position Figure 16: Photo during the impact test of slide FR7180.650-504 on Sep. 22, 2008 (drawer loaded with 9 sacks, each with a nominal mass of 5 kg, total load on slides: approx. 53 kg) According to document RAL-RG 614/8, the inclination of the slides must be 10% for the stop tests. The effective tilt of the cabinet and the tilt of the installed slides was checked on Sep. 26, 2008 using a digital inclinometer (Figure 17). Accordingly, the tilt of the slides in the first two tests of slide FR7180.650-504 was: n a = TAN (5.7 ) = 9.98% The subsequent tests were done at an increased incline of: n b = TAN (7.2 ) = 12.6%

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 22 von 33 Inclinometer a) Measurement of cabinet tilt b) Measurement of slide tilt Figure 17: Check of inclination during impact tests using a digital inclinometer (Empa LogNo.125-40.270, resolution 0.1º) 4.7.2 Test of slide FR7180.650-504 (load capacity 200 kg) On Sep. 22, 2008, three measurement series were carried out in the presence of the Empa project manager with 10 impacts per series at the following slide inclinations (Figure 14): Inclination for Measurement Series No. 1: n = 9.98% Inclination for Measurement Series No. 2: n = 9.98% Inclination for Measurement Series No. 3: n = 12.6% After the tests, the impacts had no perceptible damaging effect (Figure 18) and the slides were fully functional. Thus, the slides passed the test. The corresponding test log can be found in Chap. 7.3. Note: The tilt angles listed in the test log are based on the measurement values of Sep. 22, 2008, which were not determined using the calibrated inclinometer. Figure 18: Slight impact traces at stop of slide FR7180.650-504 after three impact test series with 10 impacts per series

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 23 von 33 4.7.3 Test of slide FR7075.650-504B (load capacity 75 kg) On Sep. 26, 2008, two measurement series were carried out in the presence of the Empa project manager with 10 impacts each at a slide tilt of 12.6% (Figure 19). Thereafter, the stops exhibited no perceptible damaging effect (Figure 20) and the slides were fully functional. Thus, the slides passed the test. The corresponding test log can be found in Chap. 7.4. Figure 19: Recorded during the impact test of slide FR7075.650-504B (loading of the drawer with 9 sacks, each with a nominal mass of 5 kg; total load on the slides: approx. 53 kg) Figure 20: Slight impact traces at stop of slide FR7075.650-504B after two impact test series with 10 impacts per series

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 24 von 33 5 SUMMARY The two inspections at Fulterer GesmbH left an extremely positive impression. The attending associates of the company, Mr. Raid and Mr. Corona carried out their work professionally. The test equipment used met all essential points of the applicable standard requirements. Deviations were either minor (such as steel beads instead of glass beads as load) or were on the conservative side (such as the effective weight of the filled sacks being greater than their nominal weight). The tests carried out in the presence of the Empa project manager proceeded in conformance with the standard. The test logs issued by Fulterer GesmbH (Chap. 7) were only checked by the Empa project manager with regard to those points that were addressed while he was present (see Chap. 4). The push-out tests were carried out by the Fulterer GesmbH. Based on the obtained documentation of those tests no indication for any irregularity could be detected. In general, all the log entries were estimated to be absolutely reliable. Based on the log entries, the results are summarised in Table 2. Test (abbreviation) Norm Punkt FR7180.650-504 Auszug FR7075.650-504B Durability test RAL-RG 614/8 8-3.4.6 passed passed Drop DIN 68858 6.1.5 passed passed Opening force DIN 68858 6.1.5 passed passed Closing force DIN 68858 6.1.5 passed passed Vertical load DIN 68858 7.8 passed passed Horizontal load DIN 68858 7.9 passed passed Stopping RAL-RG 614/8 8-3.4.6 passed passed Table 2: Summarizes the results with the aid of the test logs 6 LIST OF SOURCES DIN 68858: RAL-RG 614/8: Möbelschlösser und beschläge Auszugführungen, Schubkästen und Auszüge Anforderungen und Prüfungen, Deutsche Norm, Juni 2004 (Furniture locks and fittings slide designs, drawers and slides - requirements and tests German Norm, June 2004) Güte und Prüfbestimmungen für Schubladenschränke aus Stahl, Deutsches Institut für Gütesicherung und Kennzeichnung e.v. (Quality and test specifications for drawer cabinets made of steel, Deutsches Institut für Gütesicherung und Kennzeichnung e.v)

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 25 von 33 7 TEST PROTOCOLS PF THE FULTERER GESMBH 7.1 Test protocol 08-099D

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 26 von 33

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 27 von 33 7.2 Test protocol 08-102D

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 28 von 33

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 29 von 33 7.3 Test protocol 08-100A

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 30 von 33

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 31 von 33

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 32 von 33 7.4 Test protocol 08-103A

Empa, Laboratory: 117 Mechanical Systems Engineering Page 33 von 33