Streamlining Multiple Applicable Requirements

Similar documents
AIR QUALITY PERMIT. 7 Foundation Drive Savannah, Georgia (Chatham County)

RULE 4352 SOLID FUEL FIRED BOILERS, STEAM GENERATORS AND PROCESS HEATERS (Adopted September 14, 1994; Amended October 19, 1995; Amended May 18, 2006)

3.1 Air Pollution Control Officer (APCO): as defined in Rule 1020 (Definitions).

ALLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT AIR QUALITY PROGRAM

Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Boilers at Area Source Facilities (Boiler GACT) Final Reconsidered Rule Requirements Summary

The Premcor Refining Group, Inc. Delaware City Refinery 4550 Wrangle Hill Rd. EXHIBIT A Delaware City, DE 19706

Air Individual Permit Permit Limits to Avoid NSR

AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO IS ISSUED TO. Northern Natural Gas Company

STATEMENT OF BASIS. Cherokee Nitrogen LLC Cherokee, Alabama Colbert County Facility Number

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITY DIVISION. May 1, 2015 PERMIT TO INSTALL 4-13B. ISSUED TO Zoetis LLC

General Plan Approval and General Operating Permit BAQ-GPA/GP-5 and Proposed Exemption 38. Citizens Advisory Council Meeting March 19, 2013

Facility Name: BASF Corporation Attapulgus Operations City: Attapulgus County: Decatur AIRS #: Application #: 22788

STATIONARY GAS TURBINE ENGINES - REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (Adopted & Effective 9/27/94) (Rev. Adopted & Effective 12/16/98)

Public Service Company of Colorado THE SOURCE TO WHICH THIS PERMIT APPLIES IS DESCRIBED AND LOCATED AS FOLLOWS:

MARAMA 2015 SCIENCE MEETING JULY 29-30, 2015 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA

GENERAL PLAN APPROVAL AND GENERAL OPERATING PERMIT BAQ-GPA/GP 2 STORAGE TANKS FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC LIQUIDS

ENGINEERING CALCULATION SHEET AIR RESOURCES DIVISION

ALLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT AIR QUALITY PROGRAM

AIR QUALITY PERMIT. Kennesaw State University - Marietta Campus

This rule shall apply to any stationary source which is a major source of regulated air pollutants or of hazardous air pollutants.

Appendix K. DOC Conditions

Part 70 Operating Permit Amendment

6/1/2011. NSPS and MACT Standards for Combustion Sources at Utility Authorities What happens when a permit has both federal and state regulations?

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. Guideline for Expedited Application Review (GEAR) Oil Field Sump Replacement Tanks

Huntington Power Plant. Notice of Intent. Submitted to the Utah Division of Air Quality And Prepared by

DRAFT/PROPOSED. AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO Total Facility Operating Permit Reissuance IS ISSUED TO. Hutchinson Utilities Commission

Appendix K. Final DOC Conditions

ELECTRICAL GENERATING STEAM BOILERS, REPLACEMENT UNITS AND NEW UNITS (Adopted 1/18/94; Rev. Adopted & Effective 12/12/95)

Major/Area Source. Speaker: Eric Swisher. 23rd Virginia Environmental Symposium April 11, Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.

AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO IS ISSUED TO. Rochester Public Utilities for Two Standby/Peaking Diesel-Fired Generator Sets

RICE NESHAP Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

DRAFT/PROPOSED. AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO Major Amendment IS ISSUED TO. Hoffman Enclosures, Inc.

AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO Total Facility Operating Permit - Reissuance IS ISSUED TO. Mayo Foundation

ALLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT AIR QUALITY PROGRAM

PERMIT TO INSTALL. Table of Contents

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITY DIVISION MAY 19, 2005 NEW SOURCE REVIEW PERMIT TO INSTALL NO

AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO IS ISSUED TO NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY

3. Operation of any applicable boiler on any amount of fuel oil shall be prohibited, except as provided in Subsection C.3.

NARRATIVE. Dika Kuoh Steve Allison DATE: August 5, 2015

Summaries for Gasoline Distribution Facilities and Gasoline Dispensing Facilities 40 CFR 63 subpart BBBBBB and 40 CFR 63 subpart CCCCCC

State of New Jersey. Department of Environmental Protection Air Quality Permitting

State of New Jersey. Department of Environmental Protection Division of Air Quality

Draft Air Individual Permit Part 70 Reissuance

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

AIR EMISSION SOURCE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT

Applicable Requirements - NSPS Subpart JJJJ

TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT. Nevada Power Company, dba NV Energy. Walter M. Higgins III Generating Station

AIR QUALITY PERMIT P 01 0 May 14, 2007

Facility Name: Chevron Products Company Doraville Terminal City: Doraville County: DeKalb AIRS #: Application #: 40411

Draft Air Individual Permit Major Amendment

AIR QUALITY PERMIT. Longleaf Energy Associates, LLC C/o LS Power Development, LLC Two Tower Center, 11 th Floor East Brunswick, New Jersey 08816

AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT

AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO Administrative Amendment IS ISSUED TO. Archer Daniels Midland Co

AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO Total Facility Oper. Permit - Reissuance IS ISSUED TO. LSPCottage Grove, L.P.

Permit Holder. Permitted Equipment

AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO IS ISSUED TO INTERSTATE POWER COMPANY

Reproduction of Permit Terms and Conditions

APPENDIX D. REGULATIONS (excerpts) ON 24-HOUR EMISSION LIMITS: MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT

AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO IS ISSUED TO. St Cloud State University 720 South Fourth Avenue St Cloud, Stearns County, Minnesota 56301

RICE NESHAP ZZZZ (>500 hp Non-Emergency CI Engines) Altorfer Meeting June 15, 2010

PERMIT TO INSTALL. Table of Contents

AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO IS ISSUED TO. Archer Daniels Midland Company. ADM - RED WING 118 Main Street Red Wing, Goodhue County, MN 55066

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITY DIVISION. September 28, 2005 PERMIT TO INSTALL

Draft Air Individual Permit Part 70 Reissuance

DEP7007CC Compliance Certification

AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO IS ISSUED TO. City of Virginia

WORKSHOP REPORT. No, the RICE NESHAP applies only to stationary engines as defined in 40 CFR

2017Compliance Table with methods.xlsx

1. General Information

PERMIT TO INSTALL. Table of Contents

RULE 2280 PORTABLE EQUIPMENT REGISTRATION (Adopted October 20, 1994; Amended May 16, 1996)

Public Service Company of Colorado THE SOURCE TO WHICH THIS PERMIT APPLIES IS DESCRIBED AND LOCATED AS FOLLOWS:

AIR PERMIT ABBEVILLE, HENRY COUNTY, ALABAMA DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT, ARTICLE OR DEVICE

MACK TRUCKS, INC PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, HAGERSTOWN, MD PART 70 OPERATING PERMIT NO

Title V. Model General Permit Template. SERIES 18 Tanks. Template # SJV-TK

The subject renewal application was received on February 28, 2017 and was determined to be administratively complete on March 9, 2017.

This is a new permit condition titled, "2D.1111 Subpart ZZZZ, Part 63 (Existing Non-Emergency nonblack start CI > 500 brake HP)"

Federal Engine Regulations NSPS JJJJ/NESHAP ZZZZ

General Permit (005B) for Emergency Generator(s) burning Gaseous Fuels

ALLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT AIR QUALITY PROGRAM

Part 71 Federal Operating Permit Final Statement of Basis El Paso Natural Gas Company Dilkon Compressor Station Permit No.

AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO IS ISSUED TO. Minnesota Power Division of ALLETE, Inc.

Permit Holder. Permitted Equipment

AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO Major Amendment IS ISSUED TO. Mayo Foundation

ALLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT AIR QUALITY PROGRAM

AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT

DRAFT/PROPOSED. AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO Total Facility Operating Permit Reissuance IS ISSUED TO. ALLETE Inc dba Minnesota Power Inc

NARRATIVE. Dika Kuoh Alaa-Eldin A. Afifi DATE: December 14, 2015

Full Compliance Evaluation Report Off-Site Report

AIR QUALITY PERMIT Issued under 401 KAR 52:020

AIR PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR ON-SITE STATIONARY POWER GENERATING ENGINES

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITY DIVISION. September 7, 2017 PERMIT TO INSTALL ISSUED TO McLaren Flint Hospital

AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO IS ISSUED TO. Minnesota Power Division of ALLETE Inc

RULE 4306 BOILERS, STEAM GENERATORS, AND PROCESS HEATERS PHASE 3 (Adopted September 18, 2003; Amended March 17, 2005; Amended October 16, 2008)

MAJOR SOURCE OPERATING PERMIT

PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW SUMMARY

Permit No. NN OP

Draft Air Individual Permit Major Amendment

(2) An engine subject to this rule or specifically exempt by Subsection (b)(1) of this rule shall not be subject to Rule 68.

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. Appendix B: Rule Consistency Analysis August 20, 2009 APPENDIX B. Rule Consistency Analysis

Transcription:

Streamlining Multiple Applicable Requirements

What is Streamlining? 1. Streamlining is the process of determining one set of requirements to be incorporated into the Title V permit from among multiple applicable requirements for an emission unit to assure compliance with all the underlying applicable requirements. 2. The basic concept behind streamlining is that, as long as the permit contains the most stringent of the applicable requirements, the permit will assure compliance with underlying applicable requirements.

Legal Basis of Streamlining The legal basis for streamlining applicable requirements: 1. CAA Section 504(a): requires that title V permits contain emissions limits/standards and other terms as needed to assure compliance with applicable requirements. 2. This section does not require repetition of all terms and conditions of an applicable requirement when another applicable requirement or part 70 permit condition (i.e., streamlined requirement) can be used to assure compliance with that applicable requirement.

Legal Basis of Streamlining 3. 40 CFR 70.6(3)(i)(A). If more than one monitoring or testing requirement applies, the permit may specify a streamlined set of monitoring or testing provisions provided the specified monitoring or testing is adequate to assure compliance at least to the same extent as the monitoring or testing applicable requirements that are not included in the permit as a result of such streamlining; 4. White Paper #2 extended this streamlining to emissions limits

Considerations for Permitting Agency 1. "Streamlining may be initiated by either the applicant or the permitting authority, however, it can only be implemented where the applicant consents to its use. 2. The burden is on the applicant to file a complete title V application; thus, an application that includes streamlining would have to show that the streamlining clearly meets the streamlining provisions in 70.6(a)(3)(i)(A). 3. The PA then reviews and determine whether to approve and include it in the permit.

Considerations for Permitting Agency 4. The PA must also provide an adequate explanation of any streamlining to support public review in the Statement of Basis (Finding of Fact, Fact Sheet, Review memo) 5. The PA should encourage the source to include a permit shield with the streamlined requirements (Unless the Title V operating permit program doe not contain permit shield requirements)

Why Permit Shields? 1. If there is no shield in the Title V permit for an applicable requirement, an enforcement action may be brought against the source for violation of the rule and or permit containing the applicable requirement and the Title V permit itself. 2. If there is a shield in the Title V permit for an applicable requirement, an enforcement action may ONLY be brought against the source for a violation of the Title V permit.

What is a Permit Shield? A permit shield is specific permit language that, if properly written, can protect the source from enforcement of an applicable requirement under three cases: 1) A requirement applies to the source and a Title V permit condition explicitly includes the requirement, OR 2) A requirement applies to the source and a Title V permit condition assures compliance with the requirement (also known as streamlining), OR 3) A requirement does not apply to the source. A source may request the permitting authority to include a permit shield in the Title V permit under 504(f) of the CAA, and 70.6(f).

What a Permit Shield Cannot Do A permit shield cannot shield the source from: 1. The emergency provisions of State Statutes of the State Act; 2. Liability for any violations of applicable requirements or applicable requirements under the Act prior to or at the time of permit issuance; 3. The applicable requirements of acid rain provisions; and The authority of the Department or the Environmental Protection Agency to obtain information.

Permit Shield Example Permit Shield Language from a West Virginia Permit 1. The permittee has requested and is hereby granted a permit shield. The permit shield applies as long as the permittee operates in accordance with the terms and conditions within this permit. 2. The list below identifies requirements which are not applicable to the permittee and the determinations thereof. So long as the permittee operates within the constraints of these determinations, the permit shield shall apply to the following provisions. a. 40 C.F.R. 60 Subpart G, Standards of Performance for Stationary Gas Turbines. There are no turbines located at the Source. b. 40 C.F.R. 60 Subparts K and Ka, Standards of Performance for Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids. All tanks at the Source are below 40,000 gallons in capacity. c. 40 C.F.R. 60 Subpart Kb, Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels. All tanks storing volatile organic liquids at the Source are below 10,000 gallons in capacity. d. 40 C.F.R. 60 Subpart KKK, Standards of Performance for Equipment Leaks of VOC From Onshore Natural Gas Processing Plants. The Source is not engaged in the extraction of natural gas liquids from field gas or in the fractionation of mixed natural gas products. e. 45 C.S.R. 21, To Prevent and Control Air Pollution from the Emission of Volatile Organic Compounds. The Source is not located in Cabell, Kanawha, Putnam, Wayne, nor Wood counties. f. 45 C.S.R. 27, To Prevent and Control the Emissions of Toxic Air Pollutants. Natural gas is included as a petroleum product and contains less than 5% benzene by weight. C.S.R. 45-27-2.4 exempts equipment "used in the production and distribution of petroleum products providing that such equipment does not produce or contact materials containing more than 5% benzene by weight." 3. Compliance with the conditions of this permit shall be deemed compliance with the corresponding applicable requirements as of the date of permit issuance and/or that the requirements specifically identified are not applicable to the permittee as of the date of permit issuance. C.S.R. 45-30-5.6.a.

Permit Shield Example ( Statement of Basis Language) Language From a Statement of Basis (Fact Sheet, Review Memo, etc.) The following requirements have been specifically identified as not applicable based upon information submitted by the licensee in an application dated December 12-2006. (See Next Slide)

Permit Shield Examples (Statement of Basis) SOURCE CITATION DESCRIPTION BASIS FOR DETERMINATION Facility 40CFR Part 63, Subpart R NESHAP for Gasoline Distribution Facility is not major for HAPS Facilities Facility 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart Y, NESHAP for Marine Tank Vessel Loading Operations Facility is not major for HAPS and is permitted below the applicable throughput threshold Facility Facility 40 CFR Part 68 Chemical Accident Prevention Provisions Does not apply based on EPA proposed exemption dated 4/15/96

Streamlining Principles 1. Most stringent requirement "assures compliance" with multiple applicable requirements 2. Choose most stringent limit 3. Choose most "assuring" monitoring (e.g., if you streamline a 20% opacity limit that requires an annual source test with a 40% opacity limit that requires a COM, the streamlined limit is 20% opacity with a COM) 4. Include recordkeeping and reporting associated with the streamlined monitoring regime (where recordkeeping is the monitoring, apply "most assuring" test) 5. Compliance with all monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting associated with the subsumed limit(s) is not required

Streamlining Principles 6. The streamlining demonstration should include a side-by-side comparison of the requirements, and should be included in the Statement of Basis. (See White Paper #2 for more details on the streamlining demonstration). 7. The citation of authority for a streamlined permit condition should reference the authority for the streamlined limit, and the authority of all subsumed applicable requirements. 8. In order to protect the source from enforcement for noncompliance with subsumed applicable requirements, the permit shield should be granted in all instances of streamlining.

Streamlining Permit Language Example #1 A 200 mmbtu boiler that burns only coal is subject to the following applicable requirements for particulate matter : 25 Pa. Code Section 123.11 A = 3.6E -0.56 A: lb/mmbtu heat input E: Heat input (mmbtu/hour) NSPS Subpart Db [40 CFR 60.43b(a)(1)] = 0.05 lb/mmbtu A = 0.185 lb/mmbtu The NSPS limit of 0.05 lb/mmbtu is the "streamlined" limit because it is more stringent. The SIP limit of 0.185 lb/mmbtu is considered the "subsumed" limit (i.e., so long as the source complies with the NSPS limit, they are assuring compliance with the SIP limit). The permit condition could be written as: Unit #3: 200 mmbtu/hr boiler Permittee shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere any gases that contain particulate matter in the excess of 0.05 lb/mmbtu heat input. Commpliance with requirements specified in this streamlined permit conditoi assures compliance with the provisions in: 40 CFR 60.43(a)(1) and 25 Pa. Code Section 123.11 Permit shield applies.

Streamlining Demonstration Steps Example #2- NOx Emissions For Combustion Turbine Step One: Identification of multiple requirements: a) SDAPC Rule 69.3 b) SDAPCD NSR permit 870290 c) 40 CFR 60 Subpart GG for Stationary Gas Turbines (SDAPCD Rule 260.330 thru Rule 260.335) Step Two: Determining most stringent NOx emission limit Rule 69.3: 42 ppmdv@15% O2 NSR Permit: 13 ppmdv @ 15% O2 Rule 260.332: Natural Gas :158.4 ppmdv 15% 02 Fuel Oil: 136.4 ppmdv 15% 02

Streamlining Example #2 Step Two Discussion Based on the emission limits, NSR permit limit of 13 ppmv @ 15% 02 is the most stringent limit for both fuel oil and natural gas and therefore is the streamlined requirement. The other emission limits are subsumed.

Streamlining Example #2 Step Three: Evaluate work practice requirements Rule 69.3: None NSR Permit: 1) The distribution of ammonia across the SCR unit plates shall be the optimum distribution to meet the emission limits. 2) SCR units shall be operated at all times when operating the turbine using the automatic ammonia (NH3) control system except when the automatic control system is in breakdown status and the SCR is controlled manually. [Permit Condition #511 3)During manual operation, a trained operator shall be on duty at all times and the NH 3 injection flow rate shall not be less than 250 SCFH when operating the combustion turbine. This condition shall apply at all times, except for a 90-minute period for each cold start-up. Rule 260.332: None

Streamlining Example #2 Step Three discussion The streamline work practice requirement will be the work practices associated with the most stringent emission limit in the NSR. The work practices contained in the NSR permit are considered to be the streamlined requirements. Any other work practice requirements are subsumed.

Streamlining Example #2 Step Four: Evaluate monitoring requirements Rule 69.3: Continuous Monitoring for operational characteristics of the unit and NOx emissions reduction system NSR Permit: Continuous Monitoring of NOx and O2 (1 hour average) Rule 260.334: Continuous Monitoring off fuel consumption, ratio of water to fuel, and fuel nitrogen and sulfur content.

Streamlining Example #2 Step Four Discussion: The continuous monitoring requirements for the CEMS in the NSR Permit conditions are considered to be the streamlined requirements since they are associated with the most stringent emission limit. The other requirements are subsumed.

Streamlining Example #2 Step Five: Evaluate record keeping/reporting Rule 69.3: Operating log & General record keeping NSR Permit: All records Of performance testing measurements shall be made available to the district upon request for at least two years following the date the information is recorded. By reference, Rule 19.2 requirements, 1. Occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown or malfunction in the operation of the facility 2. Performance testing, evaluations, calibrations, check, adjustments, and maintenance of any CEMs, 3. Emission measurements, 4, Quarterly Reports Rule 260.3 34: General record keeping; Nitrogen content in the fuel; Sulfur content in the fuel 40 CFR 60.4 and 60.7 Quarterly and Excess emissions reporting

Streamlining Example #2 Step Five Discussion: The record keeping requirements in the NSR permit are the most stringent and therefore are the streamlined requirements. The other requirements are subsumed.

Final Suggested Permit Language Example #2 Final Streamlined Requirement may be written: Source ID 023: 650 mmbtu/hr Combustion Turbine: Emissions limit Permittee shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere any gases that contain NOx in the excess of 13 ppmv @ 15% 02. This streamlined permit condition assures compliance with the emissions limits contained in: Rule 69.3; NSR Permit No. 870290; 40 CFR 60 Subpart GG; Rule 260.330 thru Rule 260.335

Final Suggested Permit Language Example #2 Work Practice Requirements The distribution of ammonia across the SCR unit plates shall be the optimum distribution to meet the emission limits. SCR units shall be operated at all times when operating the turbine using the automatic ammonia (NH3) control system except when the automatic control system is in breakdown status and the SCR is controlled manually. [Permit Condition #511 During manual operation, a trained operator shall be on duty at all times and the NH 3 injection flow rate shall not be less than 250 SCFH when operating the combustion turbine. This condition shall apply at all times, except for a 90-minute period for each cold start-up. Permit shall Continuously Monitoring NOx and O2 content of flue gas and calculate average emissions on an hourly basis. This streamlined permit condition assures compliance with work practice requirements contained in SDAPCD NSR permit 870290 **(Note: No other rules have work practice requirements to be subsumed)

Final Suggested Permit Language Example #2: Recordkeeping and Reporting All records of performance testing measurements shall be made available to the district upon request for at least two years following the date the information is recorded. By reference, Rule 19.2 requirements, 1. Occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown or malfunction in the operation of the facility 2. Performance testing, evaluations, calibrations, check, adjustments, and maintenance of any CEMs, 3. Emission measurements, 4, Quarterly Report This streamlined permit condition assures compliance with record keeping and Reporting requirements of: Rule 69.3; NSR Permit No. 870290; Rule 260.330 thru Rule 260.335 (40 CFR 60 Subpart GG)

Suggested Permit Shield Language Example #2 1. The permittee has requested and is hereby granted a permit shield**. The permit shield applies as long as the permittee operates in accordance with the terms and conditions within this permit. 2. The list below identifies requirements which are not applicable to the permittee and the determinations thereof. So long as the permittee operates within the constraints of these determinations, the permit shield shall apply to the following provisions: a. Rule 69.3; b. NSR Permit No. 870290; c. 40 CFR 60 Subpart GG; d. Rule 260.330 thru Rule 260.335 **(Note: This is only applicable if the Title V permit program has a permit shield provision)

Streamlining Example #3 PA Title V Permit The Pennsylvania SIP limit for sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions from certain combustion sources requires compliance be determined on a real-time (instantaneous) basis. PA Sulfur Regulation in the Pennsylvania Code with the same numerical emissions limit requires compliance determined over a one hour period. Pennsylvania has demonstrated that a source that is in compliance with the state limit over a one hour period can be considered federally enforceable (in compliance with the Federal limit (Pennsylvania SIP)) on an instantaneous basis. To "streamline" these limits, the Title V permit: 1) lists the SO2 emissions limit from the Pennsylvania Code; 2) cites the authority of the Pennsylvania Code regulation which contains this limit; and 3) states that "Compliance with the requirement specified in this streamlined permit condition assures compliance with the provisions specified in the SIP approved SO2 limits found at 40 CFR 52.2020(c)(1)." The Statement of Basis must include a technical justification demonstrating that the state limits assure compliance with the Federal limits. Also, a copy of this streamlining language and the technical demonstration should be included.

Enforcement 1. Upon receiving a part 70 permit, a source implementing the streamlined approach would not be subject to an EPA enforcement action for any failure to meet monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements that are subsumed within the streamlined requirement and specified under the permit shield. 2. These requirements would no longer be independently enforceable once the permit has been issued, provided that the source attempts in good faith to implement the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements specified in the permit.

Streamlining Guidance Streamlining guidance/examples: EPA White Paper #2: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/t5/memoranda/wtppr-2.pdf Region 3 Website: http://www.epa.gov/reg3artd/permitting/t5_streamlining.htm

Thank You For more information contact: Paul T. Wentworth Phone: 215-814-2183 Email:Wentworth.paul@epa.gov