RUF Self Driving Cars

Similar documents
RUF capacity. RUF International, May 2010, A RUF DualMode system can obtain very high capacity by organizing the vehicles in small trains.

RUF International. Investment case April Palle R Jensen (+45)

Autonomous Driving. AT VOLVO CARS Jonas Ekmark Manager Innovations, Volvo Car Group

ACCEL. Fostering urban mobility

EXTENDING PRT CAPABILITIES

How innovations could shape our urban transportation projects?

INTELLIGENT URBAN MOBILITY SOLUTIONS MARTIN ERTL CHIEF INNOVATION OFFICER BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION BERLIN,

Intelligent Vehicle Systems

Streetcar and Light Rail Design Differences. March 2015

AND CHANGES IN URBAN MOBILITY PATTERNS

AIT Austrian Institute of Technology ELEKTROMOBILITÄT QUO VADIS? Elektromobilität im Verkehrsverbund der Zukunft 1. März 2012

Build a Green, Harmonious and Integrated Public Transport System

MAGNA DRIVETRAIN FORUM 2018

Le développement technique des véhicules autonomes

Policy Options to Decarbonise Urban Passenger Transport

LONG-TERM TRANSPORTATION ELECTRICITY USE CONSIDERING AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES: ESTIMATES & POLICY OBSERVATIONS

Metro Reimagined. Project Overview October 2017

VEHICLE AUTOMATION. CHALLENGES AND POTENTIAL FOR FUTURE MOBILITY.

Run-Flats forpeople Mover Systems F.R. Grimaldi Hutchinson Industries, 460 Southhard Street,

CHASSIS DYNAMICS TABLE OF CONTENTS A. DRIVER / CREW CHIEF COMMUNICATION I. CREW CHIEF COMMUNICATION RESPONSIBILITIES

Road Map for Sustainable Transport Strategy for Colombo Metropolitan Region with Cleaner Air, through Experience

Don Elliott, FAICP Clarion Associates, Denver, CO Pace Land Use Law Conference, White Plains December 2017

BRT: What is it & Where Does it Fit? Sam Zimmerman

Funding Scenario Descriptions & Performance

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

How to Create Exponential Decline in Car Use in Australian Cities. By Peter Newman, Jeff Kenworthy and Gary Glazebrook.

BMW GROUP DIALOGUE. HANGZHOU 2017 TAKE AWAYS.

Written Exam Public Transport + Answers

Planning of electric bus systems

Connected Vehicles. The rise of safety innovations and intelligent mobility

Road Vehicle Automation: Distinguishing Reality from Hype

Automation in urban public transportation

Sustainable transport better infrastructure - The Danish Government s vision for green infrastructure

BYD SkyRail Elevate Your Commute, Elevate Your Life

Smart transit system and e-mobility technologies for the GCC s railway aspirations

Critical Success Factors for Implementing RUC Systems. Bernhard Oehry Rapp Trans AG Basel, Switzerland

The New Age of Automobility Metalforming Industry Implications

Electrification is taking combustion engines to new heights

Using ABAQUS in tire development process

POSITION PAPER ON TRUCK PLATOONING

What is the Connector?

Welcome to the 4th Annual UCF Urban and Regional Planning Distinguished Lecture Series

Autonomous Mini-Shuttles Why Autonomy? CALSTART Webinar April 18, 2017 Michael Ippoliti, CALSTART

Copyright 2016 by Innoviz All rights reserved. Innoviz

ITS Vienna Region / AnachB.at. the innovative traffic management project for the eastern region of Austria

BIRMINGHAM CONNECTED Anne Shaw Tuesday 20 January 2015

Factors affecting the development of electric vehiclebased car-sharing schemes

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

Electric Scooters. Ignoring one key solution to sustainable urban/ metropolitan transport?

MicroRail Alternate to Light Rail

distribution An automatic solution to enhancing productivity, profitability and environmental performance ALLISON TRANSMISSION EUROPE

The Implications of Automated Vehicles for the Public Transit Industry

The Electrification of the Vehicle and the Urban Transport System

Future of Mobility and Role of E-mobility for Future Sustainable Transport. Petr Dolejší Director Mobility and Sustainable Transport

Selection of Technologies to Integrate Urban and Suburban Public Rail Transport

DAILY TRAVEL AND CO 2 EMISSIONS FROM PASSENGER TRANSPORT: A COMPARISON OF GERMANY AND THE UNITED STATES

Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal

The Motorcycle Industry in Europe. Powered Two-Wheelers the SMART Choice for Urban Mobility

Can Public Transportation Compete with Automated and Connected Cars?

THE FUTURE OF THE CAR

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

Connected Vehicle and Autonomous Vehicle (CV/AV) Mobility and Technology

Opening statements EUROPEAN TRUCK PLATOONING CHALLENGE 21 MARCH Jack Martens BRUSSELS. Chairman of ACEA task-force platooning

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

Autonomous Vehicles: Status, Trends and the Large Impact on Commuting

FACT SHEET. US 192 Alternatives Analysis Modal Technologies. Alternative Description/Overview

TAEDE TILLEMA. Senior (Kennisinstituut voor Mobiliteitsbeleid)

Yonge-Eglinton. Mobility Hub Profile. September 19, 2012 YONGE- EGLINTON

2.4 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Support the revitalization of urban cores STRATEGIC DIRECTION

AUTOMOTIVE TRANSITIONS: THE CAR TODAY The City View on Automated Driving. EUCAD 2018 Transport Research Arena Vienna 2018

Designing and financing resilient transport infrastructure

Automated Driving Are we taking the Human Factors Researcher out of the Loop? Sanna Pampel

Toward the Realization of Sustainable Mobility

Application of Autonomous Vehicle Technology to Public Transit

DENMARK. The RUF system. Questions and Answers. Palle R Jensen Inventor of RUF. RUF International

Kreis Ostholstein, the Fehmarnbelt Committee, municipalities, tourist attractions and transport enterprises in the Fehmarnbelt Region

Electric buses Solutions portfolio

Transport An affordable transition to sustainable and secure energy for light vehicles in the UK

First plug-in hybrid with the three-pointed star: the S 500 PLUG-IN HYBRID 1. A pioneer for efficiency.

Preprint.

AUTONOMOUS CARS: TECHNIQUES AND CHALLENGES

Shared autonomous transport services

Redefining Mobility Ready or not: Autonomous and connected vehicle planning and policy, now and in the future

IMPACT OF AUTOMATED HIGHWAY SYSTEMS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH.

Breakout Session. The Mobility Challenges of Our Growing & Sprawling Upstate

Park Smart. Parking Solution for Smart Cities

Vehicle Performance. Pierre Duysinx. Research Center in Sustainable Automotive Technologies of University of Liege Academic Year

Impact of Copenhagen s

Deep Learning Will Make Truly Self-Driving Cars a Reality

Streetcar and Light Rail Design Differences. February 2015

Bringing Bus Rapid Transit to Tanzania

WHAT DOES OUR AUTONOMOUS FUTURE LOOK LIKE?

Automatic Vehicles on Public Roads Lessons learned

When Do We Talk About the Future?

Autonomous Driving, Tohoku University Sendai - Review of the Excursion

on the Real Estate Industry Rutt Bridges

Global Perspectives of ITS

Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0 Project Overview. Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0 Mobilitätsbeirat Hamburg 01. July 2015

Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Predictions Implications for Transport Planning

3/16/2016. How Our Cities Can Plan for Driverless Cars April 2016

Transcription:

RUF Self Driving Cars INTRODUCTION Self Driving Cars (SDC) get a lot of attention because of their promise of taking the driver out of the loop and thereby saving a lot of lives. GOOGLE has gained a lot of respect because of their successful search algorithms and their maps. It is natural for them to try to capture a new market using IT tools and there is a lot of hype regarding the prospects of SDC operations on the normal roads. This report will discuss another option, namely a completely separated system for running automated on a special monorail infrastructure and also manually driven on the normal roads. The system is called RUF (Rapid Urban Flexible) and has been tested in Denmark RUF International Robert Jacobsens Vej 78.4.2 2300 S Copenhagen, Denmark Palle R Jensen prj@ruf.dk www.ruf.dk (+45) 32627842

SDC challenges The human driver is a very skilled person. The super computer (the brain) and the car has been developed together in a long and often painful process, so that they are highly optimized for the task and the combination works surprisingly well. It is not easy to change to a system where part of the trip is automated. In the beginning people will get scared and they may not act rationally if they are suddenly required to take over control again. The systems controlling the cars will have to work 100.00% correctly all the time and at high speed together with all other cars. SDC promises a reduction in energy consumption due to shorter distances between cars on the highway. This may not be enough in a time where the climate challenge forces all sectors to limit energy consumption dramatically. Who will be responsible when a system fails? Will the car owners be able to be insured at a reasonable cost? Will all cars be owned or will some be rented. Will close driving SDC s inspire other drivers to also drive closer? Will it be possible to ensure access to 4 GPS satellites all the time in the big cities with high rise buildings? Can hacking be prevented. Will a laser beam confuse the laser scanner system. The RUF solution (DualMode) Many of these problems can be reduced if the self driving cars are completely separated from the others using an exclusive infrastructure. RUF cars are driven as normal electric cars in the suburbs and in the center of cities. But in stead of using only highways, they will also use a network of monorail guideways where they collect power for the propulsion and for recharging their small batteries. Riding on the monorail will feel completely safe since the vehicle is running on the monorail so that its stability is very high at all times. A fail safe redundant control system placed in the guideway is controlling all vehicles all the time and is impossible to disrupt from the outside. All RUF vehicles are constructed according to the RUF standard, so that they can be closely coupled in small trains (typically 3-10 vehicles), They have smooth support wheels and a special rail brake for emergency braking. This way the climate friendly effects from this transport system can be sustainable everywhere in the world.

The RUF implementation strategy Every society needs Public Transit. With RUF it is possible to create a very attractive kind of Public Transit using small electric busses called maxi-ruf. It has 10 seats and can run in two modes. It can either use the normal roads driven by a chauffeur or it can use the RUF monorail where it can operate as a driverless metro. According to a study made with support from the EU program CyberMove, such a system for the Greater Copenhagen will cost the same as one new metro line, but cover the whole city with a network with a mesh size of 5 x 5 km. The quality of this network has been calculated in a Cost Benefit analysis. The results were that the IRR(30) was 29% for the society. See: www.ruf.dk/rufcba.xls and www.ruf.dk/rufcba.doc RUF Public Transport will be able to compete with or surpass the car regarding travel time and comfort. It will use far less energy and no parking is required. Door-to-door public transit is possible with RUF and it will make many responsible commuters use maxi-ruf for the daily commute. Once this network (320 km) has been created in the Copenhagen region, RUF cars can use this high speed network for the automated part of the trip.

The RUF standard The car manufacturers will now begin mass production of electric cars following the open RUF standard. The public will get a choice between different designs, but the critical parts will all comply to the RUF standard, as defined by RUF International in Denmark. One of the most important parts of the RUF standard is the drive system. It has normal road wheels as well as wheels to support the vehicle when it is using the monorail. The monorail support wheels are smooth wheels. They produce very little noise and minimal rolling resistance. The drive wheels press against the vertical part of the top of the monorail. This means that the pressure can be adjusted, so that friction is only present when it is needed for acceleration or climbing a hill. This means that the effective rolling resistance for RUF self driving cars will be extremely low. A reduction factor of 4 times is possible. The RUF standard also demands that all vehicles (despite different design) can be coupled close together (less than 10 cm separation). This means that air resistance can be lowered by a factor of more than 4 (10 for ideal shaped vehicles in a 10 car train).

Pro / Con Insurance It will be much easier to get insurance for a vehicle which in the self driving mode is controlled by a monorail than a vehicle which depend on a complex IT system. Transition From day one the users will get maximum benefit from a monorail solution. There would be no congestion problems. In the highway scenario, the benefits will not be significant until a large number of vehicles use the SDC mode. Electrification RUF SDC will benefit from electric supply directly from the monorail. The batteries only need to be small and they can be recharged on the monorail. Electric self driving cars will suffer from almost the same range limitation as the normal electric cars. Hacking The control system in RUF is build into the monorail, so interference from outside is extremely difficult. All vehicles drive in a fail safe mode. Chicken and Egg Normal SDC can use the normal roads from day one RUF SDC needs a monorail in order to work. This makes it difficult to implement as a car system from the beginning, but not as a Public Transit system (maxi-ruf). Visual problems RUF SDC needs a monorail system, which represent a visual challenge. There are many ways of making this problem minimal. Normal SDC looks almost normal when they are mixed with other traffic. Cost In the future, energy consumption will be the big problem which will have to be reduced very significantly. Even if a monorail infrastructure is costly, the savings in energy consumption will very soon make it a very good investment. Confusion It is vital that the driver knows what to do and how to do it. In the RUF scenario, there is no doubt. Driving is always automatic on the monorail. In the highway scenario the driver may have to be ready to take over control any time and making that transition could be very confusing at first. De-learning RUF SDC drivers will drive normally at low speed the short distance between the monorail and the destination. He/she will maintain the driver skills they will still need. A normal SDC user will gradually loose the driver skills and will have big problems when the automated system in their vehicle breaks down.